Is this man the league's MVP?

I'll be the first to admit that Ladanian Tomlinson is CLEARLY the Offensive Player of the Year in the NFL. He leads the NFL in rushing with 1,749 yards and set the single-season touchdown record with 31 so far (and that doesn't even include his 2 passing TDs).
I can also admit that Drew Brees has been a great story for a Saints team that is clearly America's team this year. Brees leads the NFL in passing yards and is 3rd in passer rating after more or less being forced out of San Diego. I'm sure we can all agree Miami is regretting choosing Daunte Culpepper over Brees.
However, I think a very legitimate argument can be made for Frank Gore butting into the MVP race. He's got the numbers and the impact that said numbers might not show.
Statistics
Frank Gore currently leads the NFC and is third in the NFL in rushing yards. A drawback to that is that he only has 8 rushing touchdowns to LT's 28. What Gore does have going for him is that his 1542 rushing yards ranks as a higher percentage of the team's total rushing yards than Tomlinson 77% to 72%.
Impact
I'll be the first to admit that what I'm about to argue is not scientific or based directly in statistics. Rather it's just a gut feeling I get when looking at the various aspects of the 3 major MVP candidates' teams (San Diego, New Orleans, San Francisco). In baseball, the MVP race often eliminates certain candidates because they play for a losing team. The argument is brought up that an MVP leads their team to the playoffs. If you have to make the playoffs then obviously it comes down to Tomlinson and Brees.
And yet I would argue that Frank Gore has in fact carried this team much further than they would have gotten otherwise and kept them legitimately competitive to the end. Alex Smith certainly showed signs of improvement, but really Frank Gore carried this team to the precipice of the playoffs. If Kevan Barlow and Frank Gore were splitting carries this year, I think this is a 4-12 team at best yet again. Or if Frank Frank Gore put up these numbers in garbage time and the team finished 4-12 or 3-13, then clearly he's not the MVP. Yet this team was competitive week in and week out (for the most part) and a few bounces the other way and they're in the playoffs this year and not talking about the playoffs for next year.
I'm not here to argue that LT and Drew Brees shouldn't win the MVP. Rather, I simply am arguing that Frank Gore should at least be included more prominently in the conversation. This 49ers team is on the verge of turning things completely around and I think he's a big part of the reason why they took such a big step this year.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
certainly the TEAM MVP
In my eyes the MVP goes to a player that completely changes the look of a team, puts a good team over the top, or so totally dominates the league that he can't be ignored. Gore didn't do those. He dominated at times, but like you said, his lack of touchdowns diminishes a great season. Brees I think deserves the award, because from what I can see, he was the key acquisition for a team that went from awful to one of the best in their conference. LT was brilliant, but he was brilliant for SD the last several years. I don't think it was him stepping up more that made SD so much better this year (he was a big part, but not all of it).
Gore should deserve consideration, but I don't think he deserves to win.
MVP ballot
Sorry
MVP is an interesting thought, but I think he reached the endzone too few times, his other stats aside, to be a nice fit for the running. And I really really hate to say it, but there is something to be said for being on a winning (not even necessarily playoff) team, even if being on a losing team is often a sad case of circumstance.
It's this never ending argument about what makes value for individual players... just ask Albert Pujols about it....
by howtheyscored on Dec 26, 2006 3:07 PM PST up reply actions
Pro Bowl
The individual value of a given player can be so subjective at times. You could conceivably argue for Steven Jackson as the league's MVP. I think my point in suggesting Frank Gore will hopefully stir some debate on the true value of players. When I was writing the post I thought to myself that if I was going to argue for Gore I could conceivably make an argument for Larry Allen, or the 49ers offensive line as a whole. When healthy, the line has dominated in the running game. You then look at this past weekend, injuries ravaged the line, Smith was worried and Gore finished with 51 yards (of course on only 11 carries).
This is a particular argument that can be both fun and frustrating because you can argue for anybody you want, but there isn't a completely 100% accurate answer (beyond Ladainian Tomlinson of course!)
by David Fucillo on Dec 26, 2006 3:15 PM PST up reply actions
If Gore is in the top 5
Gore might done more for his team but the Niners still only have six wins, although the future looks bright, and it would hard to consider a guy on a 6 or 7 win team as the leagues MVP.
LT
I think it has to go to LT
by reppin the bay @ Niners Nation on Dec 26, 2006 8:15 PM PST reply actions
Brees
Fumbles
- LT
- Brees
- Manning
- Larry Johnson (QB woes all season)
- Steven Jackson
Excellent points
Also, I had mentioned the percentage of total rushing yards for LT and Gore, but Larry Johnson rushed for like 85% of his teams rushing yards. He's carried that offense given the QB issues.
I hadn't been a big Steven Jackson fan, but I actually had him in fantasy football this year so I got a better chance to consider him week to week and he did so much for the Rams this year both rushing and receiving.

by 


























