Draft Reviews
Thanks to Call It The Throw for pointing out the Fox Sports review:
Grade: A+
Best pick: I love the pick of Jason Hill in the third round. He will be a starting receiver by mid-season.
Questionable move: Moving back up into the first round to get tackle Joe Staley. He's a good player, but was he worth the picks?
Second-day gem: Corner Tarell Brown from Texas is a good player who should have gone higher than the fifth round, but character issues drove him down.
Overall grade: A. They drafted a lot of really good football players. The scouting staff deserves big props.
Not sure how Mel Kiper mistakes the name of the NFC's leading rusher, but whatever:
After the 49ers took a tackling machine in linebacker Patrick Willis with the 11th pick, I liked seeing them move back into the first round (trading for New England's second first-round pick) and get Joe Staley, one of the best offensive tackles in the draft. QB Alex Smith needs someone who's going to protect his blind side, and Staley could do that for years to come. Jason Hill has a lot of speed and was a decent third-round pick. Defensive end Ray McDonald fits Mike Nolan's 3-4 defense; Jay Moore is an intense, hardworking outside linebacker; Dashon Goldson is more of a backup cornerback; Joe Cohen is a backup defensive tackle; cornerback Tarell Brown is a nice cornerback if he stays focused; and running back Thomas Clayton will be a very good backup to Ryan Gore.
0 recs |
37
comments
Comments
Laff.
From everything I've read since yesturday, Nolan compares Cohen to Fields. The 49ers see Fields as a great RE option in the 3-4, so that would imply that Cohen is going to play DE. He may be able to rotate inside in a pinch. He's just not very strong at the point and won't be able to do much in the sense of eating up blockers.
Goldson will not be a corner. Nolan has already says he has a better build for safety than Hudson does. It'll be an interesting camp to see how Hudson dukes it out against Goldson and Brown for one of the few remaining roster spots in the secondary.
Bah. Moore. Really?!
by sfgfan on Apr 30, 2007 8:39 AM PDT 0 recs
Moore
by Fooch on
Apr 30, 2007 8:43 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Not that easy
I know you're big on Moore, and I'm not saying he won't be a good player for us or for anyone else, but he's more of a redundant guy on our roster. I don't see him being that much different from 3 or 4 guys on our roster. Soliai was a guy who could make a bigger difference and impact on our defense, allowing the talent behind him to make plays.
In the long run, I really hope you're right and that Moore is a star. If he is though, the Banta-Cain signing is going to look like a waste I think.
by gatling on
Apr 30, 2007 8:51 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Soliai vs. Moore
by Fooch on
Apr 30, 2007 8:54 AM PDT
up
0 recs
not sure Moore can play OLB
by ALottOfSense on
Apr 30, 2007 10:58 AM PDT
up
0 recs
On the other hand.
Offensive line: With the selection of Staley in the first, it's pretty obvious Nolan envisions him as a starter. If he could take over left tackle, it would allow the team to shift Jennings over to RT. With Staley and Allen on the left side, and Smiley/Snyder and Jennings on the right, the line should be fairly solid on both sides. No more of that "Frank, you're going to the left" stuff. Not to mention, I'm sure Staley in pass protection has to be better than Kwame.
Runningbacks: The same cast returns from last season, with Frank leading the way. Clayton may be able to outplay Hicks, allowing the 49ers to be rid of him once and for all at the end of the season.
Wide receivers: This is where the unit gets it's biggest improvement boost. The team now has a #1 wideout (Jackson) in addition to a career #2 (Lelie) and a guy Nolan feels is a good #3 (Battle). Factor in the pick of Hill, and this team has four really solid players where between them, contribute in every way a wide receiver can. Throw in the two athletic tight ends (Davis and Walker), and the 49ers have a potentially elite group of pass catchers.
Quarterback: With all the new-found goodies in the passing game, Alex should feel better about next season. He'll have options everywhere, and now knows he has the team's security blanket (Gore) for years to come. People make a big deal out of Norv leaving, but I don't think Alex will miss a beat. Especially with all these weapons.
Overall: This offense has the potential to strike from any conceivable offensive angle. Think like the (Golden State) Warriors, except with even MORE talent. It should be a very exciting season.
by sfgfan on Apr 30, 2007 9:19 AM PDT 0 recs
for the most part......
Hicks will stay.....he has value in the receiving game and plays hard....if Clayton turns out then Robinson will be hitting the road....Robinson has no value (not a fan) unless he wants to move to fullback which i doubt he could handle
by Qbgetter13 on
Apr 30, 2007 10:55 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Disagree
Hicks really has no value in the passing game. His receiving ability is no different than Gore's. Gore is a pretty good back out of the backfield and should be able to do that well on 1st and 2nd down. If Robinson comes in for third down, then Hicks is kind of the odd man out.
Hick's only true value is as a kick returner, and even then he's not going to blow you out of the water. Nolan, as most people have noticed, will act as soon as he feels a player is a significant part of the team's long-term plans. He minimum tendered Hicks this offseason, and it wasn't because Hicks would bring back a draft pick (because he woudln't). Nolan just kept his options open for another year.
Where I think Clayton fits, is if he could offer the 49ers a better backup RUNNER than Hicks. If he can do that, Hicks is gone after this year.
by sfgfan on
Apr 30, 2007 11:09 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Walker has a chance to be a stud.
by jjham15 on
Apr 30, 2007 4:22 PM PDT
up
0 recs
SportsNation poll...
Source: ESPN
by sfgfan on Apr 30, 2007 11:46 AM PDT 0 recs
when did Frank start going by Ryan?
by nostocksjustbonds on Apr 30, 2007 1:02 PM PDT 0 recs
what we got
- best ILB in the draft, future leader of the defense and potential future all-pro. (Willis). This warrants an A/A+ grade.
- 3rd best OT in the draft. (Staley). Trading up to get Staley. Grade: A-
- A potential #1 or 1.5 WR with great speed. (Hill). Grade: B+
- a potential starting CB if he gets his shit together. (Brown). That we got him in the 5th makes this pick a very good one. Grade: B/B+.
We also traded a 4th round pick for a 28 year old #1 WR for a division rival. Grade: A+
Overall, the first 3 picks did not disappoint, but the 4th - 6th rounds produced a lot of question marks. If they become quality backups and role players or produce a starter, the grades will improve.
I'm happy with our draft, but I'm also sorta unhappy that I'm not happier.
by nostocksjustbonds on Apr 30, 2007 1:16 PM PDT 0 recs
Sure things
by Fooch on
Apr 30, 2007 1:31 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I'd say...
by sfgfan on
Apr 30, 2007 1:39 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Soliai
by methodrampage on
Apr 30, 2007 3:07 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Yeah.
It makes sense though. You can provision against a player causing trouble, and maybe even keep him out of trouble. You can't teach someone not to be lazy though.
by sfgfan on
Apr 30, 2007 3:18 PM PDT
up
0 recs
compromise
by Fooch on
Apr 30, 2007 3:26 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Damn Raiders
by methodrampage on
Apr 30, 2007 3:47 PM PDT
up
0 recs
No sure things
Really, I was hoping for less risk-taking in the later rounds, though I do understand the "upside argument" which is why I like the Brown pick, I just am not sure that some of these other guys have that much upside (like Goldson, projected to be a backup db/special teamer). I thought this was a good chance to add a bunch of depth, considering the number of picks we had in the 4th and taking more chances on guys there may pay off, but its less likely. Of course, if you hit, you can hit big.
So, while I do trust Nolan, I was hoping for a more conservative draft on day 2, so I'm disappointed in that respect, but of course hoping for the best.
by nostocksjustbonds on
Apr 30, 2007 4:37 PM PDT
up
0 recs
In my opinion...
Every late pick is a gamble, so might as well go for the biggest upside (especially since our major needs have been addressed to a reasonable extent this offseason). Like Fooch, I trust that Nolan and Co. have a lot more information then we do regarding character issues, and trus that they made smart gambles.
And the DJax trade was an absolute steal. Our WRs are suddenly very respectable.
by Call It The Throw on
Apr 30, 2007 1:44 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Fox Sports
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/6752446
by Call It The Throw on Apr 30, 2007 1:53 PM PDT 0 recs
Re: Prisco
I agree with you Fooch: the Staley pick and the Indy trade should be viewed as a combo-package. Think of the 49ers trading down a few spots in the 1st round next year to move up in the second round this year. So technically, Staley is a high second rounder. I'd say he presents great value considering he's regarded as the 3rd best OT (a true LT) in this draft, and maybe in the top 5 offensive linemen (in a very talented group).
by sfgfan on Apr 30, 2007 2:36 PM PDT 0 recs
Very awesome
by Fooch on
Apr 30, 2007 2:41 PM PDT
up
0 recs
UN-BE-LIEV-ABLE, but
I like how feisty they are. They're fighting for extra possessions all night long. I especially liked JRich's steal off of Terry toward the end of the game. He straight up said, "here, let me dribble that for you."
by sfgfan on
Apr 30, 2007 2:48 PM PDT
up
0 recs
BTW
by sfgfan on
Apr 30, 2007 3:19 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Sir Charles
Keyshawn tried to pull that off on Saturday during the draft and just came off horribly.
by Fooch on
Apr 30, 2007 3:25 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Joe Morgan
I like how Barkley said that as a city Golden State sucked. I really had no idea Golden State was a city.
by methodrampage on
Apr 30, 2007 3:44 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Game #6
by sfgfan on
Apr 30, 2007 3:47 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Work
by Fooch on
Apr 30, 2007 4:17 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I don't think that Morgan knows he's an idiot.
by jjham15 on
Apr 30, 2007 4:25 PM PDT
up
0 recs
more like the NBA's Michael Irvin
by nostocksjustbonds on
Apr 30, 2007 5:00 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Nostrils
by Fooch on
Apr 30, 2007 7:15 PM PDT
up
0 recs
11 years ago...
The news is that he passed away today at the age of 36. No cause of death has been publicly announced.
Source: Redskins.com
by sfgfan on Apr 30, 2007 4:09 PM PDT 0 recs
Mitchell died in his sleep.
by jjham15 on
Apr 30, 2007 4:31 PM PDT
up
0 recs
He was a good 49er
by nostocksjustbonds on
Apr 30, 2007 5:02 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Dr. Z's grade on SI.com
Another trade-up, this one involving their No. 1 next year, but it brought them Joe Staley, an LT type. I assume this means that Jonas Jennings or somebody will move to the right side, currently manned by Kwame Harris, who is a WGSK (Will Get Somebody Killed) tackle. On the first pick they got Patrick Willis, a LB who can laser in on the ball carrier with 4.51 speed. The third round brought them their fastest player (Jason Hill -- 4.32) since Skeets Nehemiah, remember him? And I like their other third rounder, Ray McDonald, a defensive end-tackle tweener, relegated to this level in the draft because of two ACL operations, but a real battler. Don't forget that former Seahawks WR Darrell Jackson is part of the draft. Cost 'em a No. 4 he did."
As much as I love my "Houshamazilly....Championship" sig, I'm strongly leaning toward changing it to "Kwame Harris...a WGSK(Will Get Somebody Killed) tackle".
by gatling on Apr 30, 2007 5:45 PM PDT 0 recs










