Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: 2011 In Extreme Home Runs

Dick Nolan

Matt Maioco is reporting that the former 49er Head Coach and father of current 49er Head Coach Mike Nolan is deteriorating in his health:

SANTA CLARA - Mike Nolan has traveled to Texas twice this offseason to see his parents. Those visits have been especially difficult, as he witnessed his father's rapid decline in health.

"When I'm down there, that's when it's the hardest," said Nolan, the 49ers' head coach. "When I'm here, I have a lot to do, so my mind is distracted. When I think about it, it's disappointing."

Dick Nolan, 75, who was 49ers head coach from 1968 through '75, is suffering from Alzheimer's disease and prostate cancer.

"He doesn't recognize who we are and he's battling cancer at the same time," Nolan said Monday. "He's not doing well."

Obviously, we hope for recovery and for him to get well soon, but realistically it's not looking good and there's no cure for Alzheimer's, so I guess we can just pray for the family during this rough time and offer our symphathy.

Then there's the Reebok issue.

Dick Nolan wore a suit and tie on the sideline during his coaching tenure. After Mike Nolan became head coach more than two years ago -- 37 years to the day after his father was named coach of the 49ers -- he sought permission to honor his father by wearing a suit on the sideline.

Reebok, the official provider of NFL coaching apparel, designed a suit for Nolan to wear twice last season. Reebok has told Nolan he will be allowed to wear a suit for another two games this season.

Nolan wants to be allowed to wear a suit for every game. He said he considers the issue important, regardless of his father's health.

"When I did it (asked), I did it for the same reason," Nolan said. "I'd feel a lot better if they just put it to rest and let me just do it all the time, because it's ridiculous they don't. We're trying to send the right message all the time. And...it's ignorant for them not to recognize that. Reebok's never had more attention given to them."

I've long had problems with the NFL selling just about everything they can (i.e., the Urlacher/Vitiamin Water and The Big Game trademarking messes), and here's another issue where selling out is probably not the best. It shouldn't be that big a deal, really, and I guess Reebok is more to blame, but just because you can sell something, doesn't mean you are required to. Soon they'll be putting billboards on the uniforms or naming the next NFL expansion franchise the "LA Gear," or some such egregious sponsored name.  

It's not like the NFL will end up in the poor house if it gives back 1/32 of its Reebok money. Hell, Reebok even designed his damn suit, so it shouldn't even come to that. Let the guy honor his father and bring a bit more class back to the game. It seems to me that would be better for the game than another coach in a sweatshirt.

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Niners Nation's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Niners Nation's writers or editors.

Comment 6 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I agree...
... its poor form/taste on Reebok's part.  You know what I'm pretty certain of, though?  If the NFL gave back ALL of the Reebok money and asked Nike to sponsor them, I think Nike would do it in a heartbeat.  Suits and athletic wear and all.

by sfgfan on Jun 5, 2007 12:24 PM PDT reply actions  

Reebok
Nolan is right that they'd be getting all the more publicity.  This is just a case of people not using common sense.  Even if they didn't care about why Nolan was doing it, I think they could get a lot of good publicity.
Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!

by David Fucillo on Jun 5, 2007 10:06 PM PDT reply actions  

And
my unitentional Reebok boycott continues.  I haven't had a pair of Reebok's since my pumps in the 3rd grade.

by methodrampage on Jun 6, 2007 8:16 AM PDT reply actions  

Be sure...
... to boycott Adidas as well, as they own Reebok.

by sfgfan on Jun 6, 2007 9:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

That would be like
boycotting my mother because she birthed my sister.

by methodrampage on Jun 6, 2007 10:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

Not exactly.
Reebok is making money for Adidas.  It should be pretty obvious that it's not just Reebok's leaders that will make huge financial (and marketing) decisions for the sake of the company.  Adidas has to have a say in this as well.

by sfgfan on Jun 6, 2007 11:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email ninersnation@gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Images_small
Official Community Thread [2/9/2012] I hate pet peeves
Ohmygoshilovemiguelxd-1_small
What the 49ers Should Do This Offseason
Frog_small
Official Draft NN Draft Thread

Recent FanPosts

Small
Niners 3rd Downs: It ain't pretty any way you slice it
Small
On Dashon Goldson
Small
We didn't suck, so we don't need Luck.
Small
Have not heard this QB scenario
Small
49ers Season in a nutshell
Riceprofile_small
Where is the faith in Chilo Rachal?
Small
If Peyton Manning is a free agent, do the 49ers go after him?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Ball Coach

Dave_small David Fucillo

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

313483_2054510893373_1562580382_31984672_1965025_n_small James Brady

Coordinator

Pirates_small smileyman

Bowman_avi_sm_small Tre9er

Assistant Coach

Pixies_logo_small (Florida) Danny Tuccitto

Memento-lies_small urnext

Me_on_beach_small WesHanson

P_willy_america_small Dylan DeSimone

Officiating Crew

Jackalope_card_small wjackalope

These3words_small these3words

San-francisco-49ers-helmet-logo-©photofile_small LondonNiner

Joe_and_bill_small twolfe2

Images_small mcwagner

Thecatch3_small mikeinsp