EDITOR'S NOTE 1:10PM: I was going to post something about this. KGB was placed on waivers by the Packers today. He is guaranteed his salary so if somebody claims him I think they'd have to pay him the prorated version of his $6.15 million salary. If he clears waivers, he'd still be guaranteed the salary, but his next time would then be able to sign him for the veteran's minimum. I know we've been trying to switch to the 3-4, but with a sufficient mix of the 4-3, is it worth making a move for him? Or maybe the team should just see what Ahmad Brooks can do at defensive end. Thoughts? I'm going to add a poll to this.
Knowing all of the major issues that the San Francisco 49ers have with the pass rush, what would everyone think about having Kabeer Gbaja- Biamila?
Kabeer was released today by the Green Bay Packers ( link: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3676640) and he was a great pass rusher in his time there. According to the article on ESPN, Kabeer has 74.5 sacks in his 9 seasons with the team which was more than Reggie White's 68.5.
He could be a great addition to this team, so tell me, what do you think? Should we try to pick him up off of the waiver wire or leave him?
Assuming they could get him, what should the 49ers do?
Sign KGB to play DE; do nothing with Ahmad Brooks (36 votes)
Don't sign KGB; activate Ahmad Brooks (39 votes)
Sign KGB AND activate Ahmad Brooks (73 votes)
Don't sign KGB and do NOT activate Ahmad Brooks (2 votes)
150 total votes