49ers-Cowboys Statistical Preview: The Fading Dallas Star
As I talked about in my comments during the all-time #2 WR voting, I'm seriously conflicted when it comes to T.O.'s 8 seasons in a 49ers uniform. On one hand, there's the consistent elite performance and The Catch II. Those are fond memories. On the other hand, there's the insubordination against Mooch, the slandering of Jeff Garcia, the isolation from his teammates, the untimely dropped passes, and the constant drama surrounding his endzone celebrations. Those are not fond memories.
The one event that coalesced all of T.O.'s negatives was his total lack of class at Texas Stadium on December 8, 2002. It's unbelievably ironic that, nearly 6 years to the day of that stunt, T.O. will be playing the 49ers in that stadium, wearing the uniform of the team he so disrespected. And what an irony it would be if, in this week's game, the 49ers played a role in the continued demise of T.O. as an elite wide receiver. The question for Niner fans this week is, "Which T.O. is going to show up?" Will it be the T.O. that made the Niners secondary look like a junior varsity unit 3 years ago? Or will it be the T.O. that has failed to show up in game after game this season, with or without Tony Romo. That is the question I'll address in this week's statistical preview.
HAS THE SHARPIE RUN OUT OF INK?
Although some of you might not like them (what's up methodrampage?), those of you that have been reading my previews and reviews already know about DYAR and EYds by now, so I'm not going to re-explain them in depth here. All I'll remind you of is that DYAR tells you a player's overall value, while the discrepancy between EYds and actual yards tells you a player's value per play. Below is a graph showing the trajectory of T.O.'s DYAR per game over the course of his career. I've made the "per game" adjustment to account for differences in the number of games he's played each season.
After the jump, I'll quantify just how bad a season T.O. is having, tell you what kind of numbers I expect from him this week, identify two crucial game situations to watch for during the Cowboys game, and make my game prediction...

As the graph shows, 2008 is the first season of T.O.'s career that he actually has a negative DYAR (-6.8), making this his worst season from a value standpoint. His previous worst DYAR/G was 5.9 in 1999, and his rookie-year DYAR/G was 6.7. So basically, the 2008 version of T.O. is 13.5 yards less valuable per game to the Cowboys than he was to the 49ers in his rookie season, when some guy named Jerry Rice was the Hall of Famer in waiting. What's especially interesting, though, is that T.O.'s collapse in value is totally unexpected. Not only does it go against the fact that he's never had a negative DYAR before; it comes only one season removed from the best DYAR/G season of his career. An argument might be made that his substandard DYAR/G this season is due to Tony Romo's injury or any of the other injuries surrounding T.O. in the Cowboys' offense. Honestly, though, does anything T.O.'s going through right now compare to having the two-headed monster of J.J. Stokes and Tai Streets lining up on the other side of the formation?
Now let's look at the difference between T.O.'s EYds and his actual receiving yards over the course of his career. Positive numbers mean he was better than the league average given the game situations he caught passes in, while negative numbers mean he was worse than the league average in those game situations.
Again, we see that the 2008 season has been totally out of character for T.O. Unlike most seasons, in which he's played better than the league average on a situational basis, he's gaining 8.6 yards per game this season less than an average wide receiver would gain in the same game situations. Not only is this his worst season in terms of situational value, it's almost 8 times worse than his rookie season!!! Also notice that, like his DYAR/G collapse, his situational efficiency collapse comes immediately after one of the best seasons of his career. Just last season, T.O. performed 13.3 yards per game better than average on a situational basis.
Clearly, whether you look at DYAR or EYds, you find the same thing. This is easily T.O.'s worst season in the NFL. Both overall and on a situational basis, he's currently a worse wide receiver than he was in his rookie season. That's pretty hard to fathom being that the intervening 11 seasons have been so consistently good. What does this mean for answering the question, "Which T.O. is going to show up?" Well, given his DYAR and EYds for this season, we should not expect T.O. to put up the 143-yard, 2 TD performance that he did last time he played the 49ers. Factoring in the 49ers' 16th-ranked pass defense DVOA, I figure we should expect a 2008-type performance from T.O. this week; something like 4 catches for 50 yards and a touchdown.
49ERS-COWBOYS DVOA MATCHUP
Here's how the 49ers stack up against the Cowboys in terms of DVOA:
|
Team |
Total DVOA |
Rank |
Offense |
Rank |
Defense |
Rank |
Special Teams |
Rank |
|
SF |
-11.8% |
25 |
-14.3% |
28 |
4.5% |
15 |
7.1% |
1 |
|
DAL |
-5.4% |
22 |
5.9% |
16 |
4.9% |
16 |
-6.4% |
30 |
All in all, this is actually a pretty even matchup for the 49ers. They're not playing the really bad Rams; nor are they playing the really good Giants. The 6.4% overall disadvantage they have against the Cowboys is almost identical to the 6.6% disadvantage they had going into their 30-21 loss to the Patriots. With respect to the three team units, the top-ranked 49ers special teams has a huge 13.5% advantage over the Cowboys' special teams, which offsets the Cowboys' 10.4% advantage when the 49ers defense is on the field. Finally, although the 49ers offense performs about 12% worse than league average, at least they're going against a defense that also performs below average.
THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS
Aside from the special teams matchup I just identified, the two other SVW's to focus on during this week's 49ers-Cowboys matchup are detailed below:
|
Situation |
SF Rank |
DAL Rank |
|
SF DEFENSE VS. DAL OFFENSE ON 2ND AND LONG |
8 |
29 |
|
SF DEFENSE VS. DAL OFFENSE ON 2ND AND SHORT |
28 |
5 |
The conclusion here is pretty straightforward. The 49ers need to stop the Cowboys on 1st down by whatever means necessary. If they succeed, they end up with a huge advantage on 2nd down. If they don't succeed, they end up with a huge disadvantage. Simple as that.
"WITH HIGH HOPE FOR THE FUTURE, NO PREDICTION IS VENTURED." - ABRAHAM LINCOLN
Before I give my prediction, I'd just like to say that my 28-13 prediction last week was pretty close, but it would have been even closer if I had actually trusted the stats, which predicted 35-13. I discounted a TD because I just didn't think the 49ers offense could score 35 points with Shaun Hill at QB. Not because I thought he's bad, but because I thought the grind-it-out kind of game that Martz would call with Hill limited the quick-strike scoring that's usually necessary for putting up 35 points. Guess I failed to account for Bulger gift-wrapping short fields. Anyway, given the statistical matchup between the 49ers and the Cowboys, here's my prediction for this week's game:
|
San Francisco 49ers |
21 |
|
Dallas Cowboys |
27 |
**DVOA, DYAR, and EYds statistics used to produce this article were obtained from Football Outsiders.
Comments
Stats
Even just looking at the normal counting stats you can see the downgrade in performance. I would’ve thought his numbers might go up with Roy Williams on board drawing defenders but Williams hasn’t done much of anything. Of course last week was Williams’s first week with Romo at the helm. Would it be all that surprising if Romo-Williams show better chemistry this week? Not saying it’ll lead to a better day for TO, but one more weapon out there. Thoughts?
Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!
by Fooch on
Nov 21, 2008 2:38 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
if you read the previews around the 'net...
…they say that the dallas pass O is going to get healthy this week because the niners are ranked 25th. only problem is that 25th is according to the simple “passing yards allowed” stat. they’re 16th in terms of DVOA. i think that, overall, the cowboys pass O won’t be “getting healthy” this week. just more of the same most likely.
by Florida Danny on
Nov 21, 2008 2:57 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Once again, a fantastic pre-game statistical analysis.
by Cruithear on
Nov 21, 2008 3:52 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
SB Nation NFL scoreboard hub
Hey folks, at the bottom of the post you’ll notice a graphic that says SB Nation NFL Scoreboard. I’m going to do a front page post about it, but for now, that’s a new hub for all SB Nation NFL action. It’s in the early stages but so far it’s a nice little page to have. Any comments or suggestions are certainly welcome.
http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/scoreboard
Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!
by Fooch on
Nov 21, 2008 4:07 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
But what's TO's BJYAR
You know, Brad Johnson-adjusted Yards Above Replacement?
Because we all know Isaac Bruce, Arnaz Battle, Bryant Johnson, Jason Hill, and Josh Morgan are all better recievers than Terrell Owens.
It’s cool and all that FootballOutsiders thinks it can adjust stats based on situation and opponent but wouldn’t it be as usefull if not more so to adjust stats based on your own team? Stephen Jackson running behind the STL line is a different story that Steven Jackson Jackson running behind the NYG line.
Are we really to believe that TO just magically sucks this year rather than think that it has something to do with his QB situation?
by methodrampage on
Nov 21, 2008 4:15 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
FO is actually pretty up front about these shortcomings on their stats pages.
A few things about these stats: Like the advanced Baseball stats, they’re designed to be more predictive than traditional numbers. While you can’t say that Jason Hill is a better receiver than TO, you CAN say that given their levels of performance on their teams this year, Jason Hill is more likely to make a bigger impact in this game than TO.
You can’t just look at the numbers and say Oh this guy’s better!!! take everything into context.
by Viliphied on
Nov 21, 2008 4:30 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
to quote from FO
* We cannot yet fully separate the performance of a receiver from the performance of his quarterback. Be aware that one will affect the other.
* These statistics measure only passes thrown to a receiver, not performance on plays when he is not thrown the ball, such as blocking and drawing double teams.
* All fumbles are considered equal, whether recovered by the offense or defense.
by Viliphied on
Nov 21, 2008 4:31 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
well put...
the whole point of DYAR and EYds (and any other stats developed by FO and others) is to provide indicators of performance that allow for a valid stat-based conclusion when you’re trying to answer a question about a player’s or team’s performance.
what’s amazing to me about this whole debate is that if you were to ask any nfl coach what the game of football boils down to, they’d say “each player has to beat the man that’s lined up in front of them.” that is, as a football player, you have to out-execute your opponent play in and play out. the most basic level of football is the play. it’s not the game, it’s not the season. the teams that out-execute their opponents on a play-by-play basis do better than those that don’t, and likewise for players. i mean, bill walsh based his entire coaching philosophy on the flawless execution of a play. though perfect execution for an entire game was a nice byproduct, it all began with execution of a play. none of what i’ve said so far has anything to do with stats. it’s a purely football-based analysis.
situational execution is exactly what stats like DYAR and EYds are trying to account for!!! it’s trying to describe performance in the most valid way possible, a way that appreciates the underlying objective of the situation-based game being played. it’s not about showing off math skills, or trying to sound smart. it’s about looking at traditional NFL stats and saying, “these are garbage because they totally ignore game situations, and the game of football is all about situations.” why does a coach sub out his small starting RB at the goalline? because he has a bigger RB that’s better in goalline situations. hell, the amount of substitution in today’s game is proof positive that situations matter. traditional NFL stats take absolutely none of this into account.
so when i want to try to describe past performance, or predict future performance, i’m going to totally ignore the NFL stats because they’re not actually telling me much about the game of football, oddly enough. it would be like a baseball manager pinch-hitting with a backup who has a .400 batting average, and ignoring the fact that the guy has batted .085 in 100 AB’s during day games against lefties.
by Florida Danny on
Nov 21, 2008 6:44 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
TO and Romo
He’s had a crappy QB for a few weeks, but the first 6 weeks he wasn’t exactly spectacular with Romo. Certainly a small sample size and a bit of cherry-picking, but still thought I’d throw it out.
In the first 6 games Romo averaged 281.5 passing yards and 2.3 passing TDs.
In those 6 games TO averaged 61.2 receiving yards and a fraction under 1 touchdown a game.
Again, it’s a limited amount of performance but that 61.2 is not too far above Danny’s 50 yard prediction. Not exactly the most scientific process of course….
Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!
by Fooch on
Nov 21, 2008 4:39 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I
sleep not well since because nugget preview statistic read not lots confuse tired brain
will later read but good looks always as
by Ninjames on
Nov 21, 2008 7:12 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
haha...
can-not compute…can-not compute
by Florida Danny on
Nov 21, 2008 7:16 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Seriously
Good read, as always. Your prediction seems pretty spot on but I cant help but boo you inside my head because I always pick the Niners deep down inside.
by Ninjames on
Nov 21, 2008 7:31 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yeah...
i realized this week that i’ve picked them to lose three of the four games that i’ve previewed, and that the natives on here might start getting restless as a result. i mean, what kind of fan is this danny guy that he never thinks the niners are going to win!!! of course, nasty little fact: i’m 3-0 so far.
by Florida Danny on
Nov 21, 2008 8:12 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You’re not supposed to let us know how accurate you are when you predict a loss ;).
by Cruithear on
Nov 21, 2008 9:57 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wow
Great write up, very thorough (Y)
I also find it interesting that most people think Terrel Owens has had a better career that Marvin Harrison.
by furrycolt on
Nov 23, 2008 5:21 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs























