Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

49ers-Bills Statistical Review: The Ugly Duckling

The consensus since Sunday has been that the 49ers' win was of the "ugly" variety. Although I did predict that type of game, I'm not going to sit here and toot my own horn given that I also predicted a 49er loss (you're welcome Cruithear). Where there's been no consensus, however, is regarding how we should interpret this ugly victory. All week, the fans and media have been engaged in a debate that sounds like something out of an Alfred Lord Tennyson poem: Is it better to have played poorly and won or to never have played poorly at all? In my statistical game review this week, I'm going to try to answer two related questions: (1) What does an ugly win look like statistically? and (2) Should we be optimistic or pessimistic after this ugly win?

ISN'T SHE U-GLY? ISN'T SHE WON-DER-FUL?

So what does an ugly win look like statistically? Let me start painting the picture for you with DVOA:

  • The 49ers played three times less efficiently than they normally do (-44.9% vs. -15.0%).
  • The 49ers played their second least efficient game of the season (only -55.7% vs. SEA was worse).
  • The 49ers played considerably less efficient than the Bills did (25.4% less efficient).
  • The 49ers underperformed their 3.6% DVOA disadvantage going into the game (by 21.8%).
  • The 49ers' offense played 42.6% less efficiently than the league average.
  • The 49ers' offense played 32.3% less efficiently than the Bills' offense did.

After the jump, I'll continue to paint the portrait of an ugly duckling...

Star-divide

Now, how about adding some offensive line stats to the picture:

  • 2.75 actual yards per RB carry, 2.0 unadjusted line yards per RB carry, and 2.63 line yards per RB carry when adjusted for opponent. The average NFL yards-per-carry is 4.20.
  • 11.5% sack rate, and 15.8% sack rate when adjusted for opponent. The average NFL sack rate is 6.3%.

Let's finish off the picture with a running back stat:

  • Frank Gore gained only 3.0% of his rushing yards after the first 10 yards of a carry. The league average is 19.0%.

Basically, the Niners played worse than the Bills, especially on offense, yet still won the game. And despite being wildly inefficient running the ball, they still won a game played in weather conditions that required efficiency in the running game. That right there is the protrait of an ugly duckling.

So how should we feel about this ugly win? Well, as bad a performance as it was, it was also a statistical anomaly in two ways that should bring 49er fans a sense of optimism for the future:

  • This was the first game of the season that the Niners won despite being outplayed by a better DVOA team. They had previously gotten outplayed in their Week 2 win at Seattle, but the Seahawks had (and still have) a worse DVOA than the Niners, which means that the Niners technically were a statistical favorite.
  • This was the Niners' first win east of the Mississippi against a superior team since the beginning of the Nolan era. They previously were 0-12 in such matchups.

So let's stop and absorb what these two statistical anomalies mean: For the first time in at least 4 seasons (I'm going to look at this in more historical depth), the 49ers just beat a better team east of the Mississippi despite being outplayed statistically in the game. Maybe this is just some kind of regression to the mean, or maybe it's a sign that the long-lauded "character in the locker room" is actually starting to translate into wins. We won't really know for sure until the end of the season (aka after that game in Miami on 12/14), but I'm starting to feel optimistic given the consistent will to win that this team is showing under Mike Singletary.

THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS

Just to refresh our memories, I identified the following strength vs. weakness (SVW) matchups for the 49ers in their game against the Bills: 

Situation

SF Rank

BUF Rank

SF DEFENSE VS. BUF OFFENSE ON 2ND AND LONG

6

32

SF OFFENSE VS. BUF DEFENSE ON 3RD AND MID

27

1

So how did they do? As you may recall, the bottom line of the 2nd-down SVW was that the 49ers’ defense needed to limit Bills yardage on 1st down, putting them into 2nd and long situations. That’s how I’m going to score success/failure here. Also, the Niners' offense only had 2 plays on 3rd and mid (4-6 yards), so I’m not going to grade that SVW (FYI, they were 50% successful).

1st-Down DefenseIn continuing the week’s ugly duckling theme, the 49ers won despite doing performing poorly in this crucial situation. On the Bills’ 27 total 1st-down plays, the Niners’ defense forced the Bills' offense into 2nd and long 13 times, allowed 2nd and short 4 times, allowed another first down 7 times, and put the Bills into 2nd and mid 3 times. All told, that’s a 13-11-3 performance with 7 new first downs allowed, which is pretty bad when you consider their 1 first-down allowed, 14-5-6 performance last week against the Cowboys. What makes this performance even worse is that the situation was more crucial this week because the Bills are actually worse than the Cowboys on 2nd and long. It can’t be understated how poorly the Niners’ D played on first down against the Bills, so I’m going to bring up one last stat regarding this SVW. On the Niners’ 13 successful first-down plays, the Bills only gained a total of 3 yards, or 0.2 yards per play. In contrast, the Bills gained 173 yards, or 15.7 yards per play, on the Niner D’s 11 unsuccessful first-down plays. On those plays, the Bills’ offense had gains of 50, 22, 19, 14, 13, 11, and 11 yards. That, my fellow 49er fans, is ugly.

Now, you might say, "Hey Danny. In your preview, you said the Bills were much better than the Cowboys on first down." This is true. However, the Niners’ D also performed worse than expected when they did force the Bills into 2nd and long. Specifically, they were successful 8 times, giving up a total of 1 yard (0.3 yards per play) and recovering a fumble; while they were unsuccessful 5 times, giving up a total of 61 yards (12.2 yards per play). Score: Taking all of the above into account, it was a double whammy, or alternatively…Double Bogey.

Using my golf scoring system, the Niners were 2-over-par on one hole. Again, their SVW performance just further reinforces the fact that the 49ers beat the Bills despite playing particularly poorly on a play-by-play basis. While it’s a hell of an achievement, and a rare one to boot, it’s not a recipe for consistent success unless the "character" it suggests is a sign of better things yet to come.

Next up this Friday…a preview of the Jets game. Will the 49ers play the role of spoiler or that of Brett Favre’s red-headed step-child?  

 

**DVOA statistics used to produce this article were obtained from Football Outsiders.

 

Poll
Which is better?
To have played poorly and won
66 votes
To never have played poorly at all
17 votes

83 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 18 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

At this point in the season....

I would rather have played well and lost. If we still had a legitimate shot of making the playoffs, I would take the ugly win in a heartbeat. At this point, I think the rest of this season should be viewed as a stepping stone for 2009. We need to build confidence and discipline as well as upgrade our personnel. As the execution in this game showed, discipline is coming under Singletary. A well played loss will hopefully build confidence and bring us one step closer to a good draft pick (hopefully another patrick willis).

However, Mike Singletary and this offense need time to work together and get on the same page (Hill has been working with the 3rd team most of the season). Thus, I would rather take an ugly win then not play at all. Go 9ers! Let’s take down Brett.

by rdub49erfn on Dec 3, 2008 2:21 PM PST reply actions  

Just win baby

I don’t care if you crawl, stumble and trip to the finish line… as long as you win. We played well against Arizona the second time around and look how disheartening that loss was.

Joe and Steve were under the same system for years... don't expect Smith to be super so soon.

by bayboy on Dec 3, 2008 2:27 PM PST reply actions  

Disheartening to whom?

I admit that I felt sick after that game, but now I look at the game as the start of our turnaround. As far as I can tell, the players weren’t disheartened. They followed up the game with wins against St. Louis and Buffalo and, in my opinion, a good game against Dallas.

That loss was especially brutal because it completely devastated any hopes we had of making the playoffs. It was a full game swing and handed the Cardinals the tie-breaker. The difference between the Bills game and the Cardinals game was that against the Cardinals there was a real possibility of making the playoffs.

by rdub49erfn on Dec 3, 2008 2:47 PM PST up reply actions  

in re stats...

they actually outplayed the cardinals in that game too, by 12.8%…

+8.3% to -4.5%

it’s the only game they’ve lost in which they outplayed their opponent according to DVOA.

by (Florida) Danny Tuccitto on Dec 3, 2008 2:52 PM PST up reply actions  

yeah, I sort of looked at that game as make up for the cards game.
But your poll question … since you don’t specify whether you win or lose the game in the latter (never played bad at all) choice, it seems like the obvious pick to me.

FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?

by zenbitz on Dec 3, 2008 4:57 PM PST reply actions  

Yeah, it should be “play badly and win” against “play well and lose”

Otherwise, it’s not really a useful question.

GROUGTHINK ALERT

by groug on Dec 3, 2008 10:41 PM PST up reply actions  

it's supposed to be a play on words guys...

analogous to tennyson’s line about love…figured people would get the point. i could have worded the poll question to make it very specific, but that would have defeated the purpose of the analogy. anyway, note to self for the future: beware the poll-wording police. :-)

by (Florida) Danny Tuccitto on Dec 4, 2008 7:51 AM PST up reply actions  

Then shouldn’t the second one have been “to never have played at all”?

YES I AM EXACTLY THIS PEDANTIC

GROUGTHINK ALERT

by groug on Dec 4, 2008 1:51 PM PST up reply actions  

groug’s only pretending to really be this pedantic. In fact, he’s usually worse than this.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Dec 4, 2008 5:47 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't understand why....

79% voted “to have played poorly and still win,” while the other choice is “to never have played poorly.” It doesn’t say “to never have played poorly and lost

I personally would like the Niners to never play poorly. Just my opinion.

when will the Kenny Thomas Reign of Terror end?!!??

by diehardkingsfan5 on Dec 4, 2008 12:38 PM PST reply actions  

I dunno.

I figured it meant to never have played poorly and lost. I don’t see why anybody wouldn’t assume this. I surely saw it and thought about it but I just felt like he meant the latter so I went with it.

by James Brady on Dec 4, 2008 12:40 PM PST up reply actions  

And of course we’d rather have the Niners not play poorly. >_> Sarcasm much

by James Brady on Dec 4, 2008 12:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Stat Guy

I think he just can’t figure out the English part of things since he’s a numbers guy

Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!

by David Fucillo on Dec 4, 2008 5:04 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email ninersnation@gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Niners 3rd Downs: It ain't pretty any way you slice it
Images_small
Official Community Thread [2/9/2012] I hate pet peeves
Ohmygoshilovemiguelxd-1_small
What the 49ers Should Do This Offseason
Frog_small
Official Draft NN Draft Thread

Recent FanPosts

119588-192027-glenn-quagmire_large_small
Season Highlight Videos
Take_no_shit_small
Free Agency, the Draft, and Kendall Hunter
Small
Not fussed about No Hawk and no Rogers aint no stress
Small
On Dashon Goldson
Small
We didn't suck, so we don't need Luck.
Small
Have not heard this QB scenario

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Ball Coach

Dave_small David Fucillo

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

313483_2054510893373_1562580382_31984672_1965025_n_small James Brady

Coordinator

Pirates_small smileyman

Bowman_avi_sm_small Tre9er

Assistant Coach

Pixies_logo_small (Florida) Danny Tuccitto

Memento-lies_small urnext

Me_on_beach_small WesHanson

P_willy_america_small Dylan DeSimone

Officiating Crew

Jackalope_card_small wjackalope

These3words_small these3words

San-francisco-49ers-helmet-logo-©photofile_small LondonNiner

Joe_and_bill_small twolfe2

Images_small mcwagner

Thecatch3_small mikeinsp