Niners Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: The 2009-2010 Card Chronicle Big East basketball preview

It's Official: Mike Singletary has fired Mike Martz

As I was about to head out the door, the press release was issued announcing the firing of Mike Martz as offensive coordinator:

The San Francisco 49ers announced today that offensive coordinator Mike Martz has been dismissed from the coaching staff.

“After an evaluation period I felt it was best to go in a different direction,” said head coach Mike Singletary regarding the dismissal of Mike Martz. “This was not an easy decision because I appreciate Mike Martz, and I enjoyed working with him. He is a true professional, and I wish him the best in the future. I do recognize the need for a long term solution on the offensive side of the ball.”

The last sentence speaks the most truth about this.  I would have had no problem with another year of Martz as the OC, but he was not a long term solution.  I'm quite intrigued to see who gets brought in to interview.  Let the search begin.

EDITOR'S UPDATE 2:45PM: Martz released a statement:

I had an outstanding conversation with Mike Singletary this afternoon. I believe he will be an outstanding head coach in the National Football League. I wish him nothing but the best. I am not what he is looking for offensively. I understand that. This is just a part of professional sports.

Matt Maiocco had a particularly interesting quote from Martz:

"We should be a top-10 offense," Martz said. "I feel that we're either a top-10 offense or I failed."

0 recs  |  Comment 240 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Martz/Nolan

This kind of reminds me of the Nolan firing. The national media was starting to talk about it, so the team pulled the trigger sooner than anticipated.

Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!

by Fooch on Dec 30, 2008 1:39 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

You beat me to it

I had the edit ready, too. Hit refresh in another tab and bam, Fooch with the coverage.

by Ninjames on Dec 30, 2008 1:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm a MACHINE!

Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!

by Fooch on Dec 30, 2008 1:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah well, in my defense

You were blatantly holding, there was illegal contact, AND you said something rather hurtful about my mother.

by Ninjames on Dec 30, 2008 1:45 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

At least...

He wasn’t watching “Joe Millionaire”.

You know, where was John York during Nolan’s firing. He was the guy who hired him, right?

John York = gutless.

by drummer on Dec 30, 2008 1:43 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Well it seems pretty obvious

That the new Mike is all about the run game and would be looking for someone to follow his thought process though. Martz is pass happy – wasn’t gonna work too long with Singletary.

But now what? Any ideas who would be hired in place of Martz? Who’s still on the market and would fit this scheme?

And yes, another Offensive Coordinator for our QBs. What does this mean about Alex Smith and Shaun Hill? Does this equate to a QB draft pick in the early rounds?

Who’s got answers?

We still believe!!

by R Dizzle on Dec 30, 2008 2:17 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

New OC...

Trent Dilfer. Knows both Smith and Hill. Kmows a tad about smash-mouth football. He’s got a ring.

by StepUp on Dec 30, 2008 2:20 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

semi-related

Trent Dilfer is the worst NFL analyst ESPN has had in a long time. Apart from Emmit Smith, I can’t think of another analyst from any station that so regularly makes me cringe.

by shlecko on Dec 30, 2008 3:12 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Michael Irvin

Lott's Prayer: Almost as many words as the Lord's Prayer, but the Lord wouldn't recognize any of them.

by Nosetackle Supreme on Dec 30, 2008 3:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

if we're including baseball analysts...

then the discussion ends at Joe Morgan

by shlecko on Dec 30, 2008 4:50 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

And then starts again at Tim McCarver.

99 MPH with as much control as a deflating balloon - CurveballKing on H-Rod

by Scottbass on Dec 30, 2008 10:44 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

And then starts again at Tim McCarver.

99 MPH with as much control as a deflating balloon - CurveballKing on H-Rod

by Scottbass on Dec 30, 2008 10:44 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

F-ing post button.

99 MPH with as much control as a deflating balloon - CurveballKing on H-Rod

by Scottbass on Dec 30, 2008 10:45 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think it needed to be said twice

Tim McCarver is horrible.

GROUGTHINK ALERT

by groug on Dec 30, 2008 10:56 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Tim McCarver is horrible.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Dec 30, 2008 10:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Hmmm...

I just heard Bill Walton with that post.

by drummer on Dec 30, 2008 11:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm sorry...

Tom Tolbert - NBA

"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Dec 30, 2008 3:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

WHAT

dude, I love Mr.T…

When the cd player in my car broke like a year ago, listening to the Razor and Mr.T on KNBR kept me sane. And thoroughly entertained.

by shlecko on Dec 30, 2008 4:51 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

ditto

i am a Tolbert fan.

STEVE HOLM! refuses to be the odd man out.

by UnleashTheGore on Dec 30, 2008 4:52 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Tolbert by himself gets on my nerves. He spends a lot of time acting like his opinion is fact, and he repeats himself mid-sentence (and post-sentence) A LOT. If he has anything at all to say, he’s sure to say it 5 times in 30 seconds.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Dec 30, 2008 6:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

for me it's not so much his comments

I think it’s the mini/faux-goatee that irritates me most. I have always liked and pulled for the guy, but he needs to tone it down a notch.

That being said, I remember Steve Young sounding awful when he started his analyst role, but now he has worked through it and is one of my favorites.

STEVE HOLM! refuses to be the odd man out.

by UnleashTheGore on Dec 30, 2008 4:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

lots of guys have rings and Dilfer’s got his courtesy of Ray Lewis.

BTW, that’s what this team will become (or continue to be) on offense: The Baltimore Ravens. In other words, boring.

Lott's Prayer: Almost as many words as the Lord's Prayer, but the Lord wouldn't recognize any of them.

by Nosetackle Supreme on Dec 30, 2008 3:13 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

In other words, boring.

I’ll gladly take boring in exchange for a Super Bowl ring, riding the shoulders of Patrick Willis.

by shlecko on Dec 30, 2008 3:14 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

LOL...

Comedy at it’s finest.

by drummer on Dec 30, 2008 3:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I prefer to wing multiple rings with a high-scoring offense.

Lott's Prayer: Almost as many words as the Lord's Prayer, but the Lord wouldn't recognize any of them.

by Nosetackle Supreme on Dec 30, 2008 3:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

wing = win

Lott's Prayer: Almost as many words as the Lord's Prayer, but the Lord wouldn't recognize any of them.

by Nosetackle Supreme on Dec 30, 2008 3:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Don’t tell that to Tony Stark.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Dec 30, 2008 6:36 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

well played

Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!

by Fooch on Dec 30, 2008 6:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Wow

Schefter is also reporting that Mike Shanahan has been fired from the Denver Broncos. That shocks me, he’s always struck me as a great coach.

by Ninjames on Dec 30, 2008 2:20 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Wow

Not shocking, but still kind of.

http://blogs.nfl.com/2008/12/30/broncos-fire-long-time-coach-shanahan/

Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!

by Fooch on Dec 30, 2008 2:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I hear the Raiders have an opening.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Dec 30, 2008 3:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

That's my prediction

Shanahan to the Raiders. He won’t want to go but Al will give him a Javon Walker-esque contract.

by methodrampage on Dec 30, 2008 3:56 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Davis would have to pay him..

His money from his last go round with OAK, right?

by drummer on Dec 30, 2008 3:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

And promptly fire him two seconds after signing the contract?

“That’s right, beyotch! I hired you just to FIRE you again! Get the hell out of my sight!!!”

"He called the sh** POOP!" -- Adam Sandler

by JRPhillips on Jan 1, 2009 12:51 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

damn. we should have waited before hiring Singletery.

Lott's Prayer: Almost as many words as the Lord's Prayer, but the Lord wouldn't recognize any of them.

by Nosetackle Supreme on Dec 30, 2008 3:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Seriously?

I don’t think it would be worth jerking him around waiting for something better to come along. Maybe Shanahan would have come back, but maybe it takes some time to make it work. I think Singletary would walk if we made him wait because we might get Shanahan.

Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!

by Fooch on Dec 30, 2008 3:08 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

you’re right, but I’ve always thought Shanahan should coach the 49ers and never thought that he’d be canned from Denver. I’m just a bit disappointed that it can’t now work out.

Lott's Prayer: Almost as many words as the Lord's Prayer, but the Lord wouldn't recognize any of them.

by Nosetackle Supreme on Dec 30, 2008 3:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Better get a damn good replacement!

Don’t want this to be a classic bears team where the Defense is great but the Offense sucks nads.

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Dec 30, 2008 2:25 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Umm, the Bears in 1985 led the NFC in scoring. Surprised? Shocked? Look it up. You win in this league (and in Singletary’s world) with Great Defense, Controlling the Clock through the Running Game (unless you have Bill Walsh, Joe Montana and Jerry Rice to control the clock throught the short passing game), Timely Passing (like with McMahon . . . not a lot of passes but a lot of “Big Plays” in the passing game) and in LIMITING TURNOVERS!

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 2:44 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, but...

Around here, we like to win more than one Super Bowl per half-century.

Check out The Examined Life. Or don't. Whatever.
"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f**kin' amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK

by Josh from Hollywood on Dec 30, 2008 2:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Dude

The 85 Bears had Waltor Payton. We don’t! The rest of those years the Offense sucked!

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Dec 30, 2008 3:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You and “Josh from Hollywood” are funny (but sorely misinformed). You made an Incorrect statement regarding the Bears offense. They couldn’t “suck nads” if they led the league in scoring.

I loved Walter Payton. I (along with Ditka and others) think he was the finest “all around” player (not just running back) in the league. That said, in 85 he was “slightly” on the downhill side of his career. He was still a great back. He won the game the Bears played in GB that year singlehandedly (he ran for I think 160 or 190 yards that day). Still, the difference between Frank Gore in 2009 and Walter Payton in 1985 isn’t huge, by any standard.

Great running backs do three things: They run, they block and they catch> Walter did all three of those things to perfection. The Bears rookie running back, Matt Forte, had an unbelievable year for the Bears. He did all three of those things great. Not only that, but I think he fumbled once or twice. Stat wise, he might have had a better year, as a rookie, than Payton.

I’m not taking ANYTING away from the late, great Walter Payton. All I’m saying is that, having Frank Gore in the backfield isn’t too shabby.

The have a great RB. In order to accomplish what the Bears did (if that’s what they want to do) they need to do this:

A) Score on defense. Running back a fumble or interception for a TD is a great way to kill the other teams momentum.

B) While not passing “too often”, make big plays in thre passing game. McMahon and company did this to perfection. It’s not how many passes you throw it’s how effective you are.

I’m not trying to argue with you or anyone else. It is what it is. Check my facts on the Bears and you’ll see that I’m correct.

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 3:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Great running backs do three things: They run, they block and they catch

In other news, running backs do three things….

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Dec 30, 2008 3:26 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Get paid tons of money, get all the chicks, and

shoot their legs. Oh, wait. Those are WR’s.

"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Dec 30, 2008 3:55 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Apparently at least one, with a mailbox.

99 MPH with as much control as a deflating balloon - CurveballKing on H-Rod

by Scottbass on Dec 30, 2008 10:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Another IDIOTIC comment (cause you have nothing intelligent to say). The league is full of RB’s that, while they obviously can run the ball, they can’t be used in the passing game as a receiver and more importantly, they can’t be used in blitz protection.

Gore can do all three.

Try (I know this is hard for you) to say something intelligent (for a nice change of pace).

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 4:02 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The 9ers need more than Gore at RB

If they are going to be a conservative team, then they have to have a talented RB to spell Gore. Foster might be that guy but who knows. Adrian Peterson has Chester Taylor to spell him and he can come in and rip off a couple 100 yard games per season. Thats what the 9ers need if they are going to be a Running team.

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Dec 30, 2008 5:57 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I didn’t say they do it well. I say they do it.

You’re the one who described the single most basic description of the 3 ost basic job requirements for a running back as though they were somehow a profound trade secret.

My problem with your comments is consistently that you describe the ends as though they are the means. A good coach wins. Period. Okay, so that’s the result of a good coach, but it’s not in any way the symptom. A good running back can run the ball well. Okay, yeah…. so? How does he do that?

The result is not the same as the process, but you seem to insist that it is at every turn.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Dec 30, 2008 6:43 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Look, Jim Brown is considered the greatest RB of all time. He (almost) never blocked or caught a pass. Barry Sanders couldn’t block but could catch a pass. Same with OJ. My point was that Walter blocked like a guard and caught like a receiver. Unless a teams running back runs like Brown, Sanders, Sayers or OJ it’s a HUGE advantage for him to be able to do all three. That means they don’t have to take him out in obvious passing situations cause he’s another receiver and can be used in blitz pick-up .

Their last back Benson couldn’t do anything and the one before that, Thomas Jones could run and block but wasn’t much as a receiver.

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 7:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I’m not disputing that Walter Payton is a great running back.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Dec 30, 2008 8:17 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Payton & Gore

This started when maveric_87 said that the Bears had Walter Payton and we (the Niners) don’t. I simply pointed out that Bears rookie Matt Forte had an unbelievable year in all three phases of the game (running blocking and receiving). He’s not Water Payton but for one year (his rookie year) he wasn’t far off.

From all that I know about Frank Gore I think he’s that same type of back, which bodes well for the Niners going forward.

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 9:03 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Wait but I thought GREAT RB's did three things
Great running backs do three things: They run, they block and they catch
Jim Brown is considered the greatest RB of all time. He (almost) never blocked or caught a pass. Barry Sanders couldn’t block but could catch a pass. Same with OJ.

So are Brown and Sanders, or maybe even Adrian Peterson not great backs because they don’t do all three or is your original comment erroneous?

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 7:47 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Wait but I thought (that's your problem)

I’ll go REAL SLOWWWWWWWWWWW for you. OK!

When you can run the ball as well as Jim Brown, or Barry Sanders or OJ,or Peterson you can get away with not doing all three.

If you aren’t at that level, and most guys aren’t close, then to be considerd a “great back” in this league you better do all three.

Got it? I know that “deep thinking” and “football intelligence” aren’t your strong suit, so once again I’ve taken the time to explain things to you and to help educate you.

You’re Welcome!

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 9:56 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

So your initial statement was false?

Go ahead admit it.

Mewelde Moore can do all three. Is he a great back?

To be a great back you actually have to be great at one aspect of your game (usually running). Simply being good at all 3 doesn’t make you a great back. Get it?

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 10:14 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Sometimes I don’t spell EVERYTHING out because I assume that I’m talking about people that know what they’re talking about or can at least connect the dots.

Big mistake.

Ergo: To be considered a “Great Back” in the league, UNLESS you can run like Brown or Sanders or Sayers or OJ or Peterson you need to be able to do all three phases WELL!

Know what’s funny with you? You’re great at nit picking and straying off course and so on, but you NEVER seem to make an intelligent statement that shows you have any REAL understanding of football.

You’re great at saying things like “Romanowski isn’t a credible source.” Why? Cause he used roids?

Tell me why Romo should be dismissed but you should be listened to?

Try, for once, to stay “on message” and to just answer a simple question.

Why is Romo not credible and why is your opinion correct but his isn’t?"

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 10:43 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Frank Gore

What are your thoughts on Frank Gore as a blocker? He’s no Barry Sanders, but he can run well and catch well (leading 49ers receiver the last couple years, although not this year).

Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!

by Fooch on Dec 31, 2008 10:59 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Frank Gore

Honestly Fooch, I don’t know. I don’t ever claim to be a “know it all.” While I’ve been following the league for most of my life, over the past few years, I haven’t paid any “particular” close attention to the Niners.

Living in Phoenix of course I “hear” a little more of them as Cardinal opponents. There really wasn’t a whole lot to follow regarding Singletary cause he was more behind the scenes and wasn’t even the DC to follow.

I always wondered why he was not the HC but I guess Mike also need a few years to feel ready for the job.

Since Singletary took over I have watched all their games and followed everything real close.

That’s along and winding and honest way of saying that, beyond the fact that I know he’s a great “runner” I really couldn’t tell you how he ranks when it comes to blocking and receiving.

BTW: I didn’t stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night but me and Bryant Young are from the same hometown (along with Jerry Colangelo and Jim Bouton)!

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 11:22 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Romanowski
"Romanowski isn’t a credible source." Why? Cause he used roids?

Yeah, you can put me in the camp that thinks cheating much ruins your credibitly. While spitting in the faces of other players and being an overall jerk sure doesn’t help things. Maybe he’s got an axe to grind with Shanahan. If you truely think Romanowski is as credible as Steve Young then I’ve got some land in Aruba I’d like to sell you.

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 11:09 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Romo

Of course, as usual, you never heard the quotes from Romo. See, that’s really at the heart of the issue here. I take the time to watch and listen and read things.

Fact is, Romo said some complimentary things about Shanahan. He was in no way “grinding an axe.”
All he (and many other players and anyalysts and myself) was doing was stating the obvious: SINCE ELWAY RETIRED THE PAST DECADE HAS BEEN MOSTLY A DISAPPOINTMENT IN DENVER!!!!!!!!!!!

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 11:31 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't need to hear his quotes to determine his credibility

Whether his quotes are fluffy and nice or down right nasty they have little to do with his credibility. Mind you, I also said maybe he had an axe to grind, I didn’t say that he most definitely did I just let that door remain open.

The past decade has been a disappointment for, oh say, about half the league. It’s also important to note that being unsuccessful and being a disappointment are two separate things but you keep using them interchangeably.

The Patriots were highly successful last season, although I think most fans, given their level of domination up to the Super Bowl, would consider their season a disappointment.

Sure it’s possible that the last decade has been viewed as a disappointment in Denver, they were spoiled with Elway and Shanahan, but the past decade, relative to the rest of the NFL, has been pretty successful for Denver.

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 11:43 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

More nonsense. They were “spoiled with Elway and Shanahan” which is why Shanahan was FIRED!

Actually, you were HALF RIGHT. They were spoiled by Elway and this past decade has been, on balance, a disappointment for Denver.

Half the league. We’re talking about Denver. Stick to the subject at hand.

What on Gods green earth does last years Pats have to do with ONE playoff win in the past decade in Denver?.

What? (besides nothing).

Me and a bunch of writers and anyalysts and ex-players make a simple and accurate comment and you’ll spend the rest of your life arguing against it.

What’s next? That’s there are billions of people in China that don’t get NFL football so Denver should just be thankful for what they have.

You’re a JOKE!

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 12:20 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You don't get it

Unsuccessful and disappointment aren’t synonyms. Sure sometimes they go hand in hand but not always. The thing you’re failing to understand is that its possible to be a success, relative to the entire NFL, and still be a disappointment. I believe this debate was started while considering success not disappointment. But you keep going back and forth between success and disappointment like they’re one in the same.

Shanahan has had a very successful tenure in Denver, with or without Elway. There are few coaches who will ever accomplish what he did, with or without Elway.

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 1:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

This is too much

It’s pretty awesome that you think you’re some kind of divine shining light of football knowledge.

This whole great running back debate got started because you made one of the most blatantly obvious statements of the year and then wrote it off like it was some kind break through.

Great running backs do three things: They run, they block and they catch

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 11:16 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Again this is how that “statement” came to be. Someone said that he didn’t want a classic Bears team of all defense and no offense. I pointed out that the 85 Bears led the NFC in scoring (which surprises most people).

Someone commented to say that the Bears had Walter Payton, as if to say that the Niner’s couldn’t "replicate’"the Bears cause they don’t have Walter Payton.

I then tried to point out that you basically don’t need a HOF back like Walter, you just need a Great Back who can do all three things.

Bears rookie Matt Forte did an unbelievable job in all three phase of the game. I know as I watched him play all year. He’s a rookie. He’s not in the HOF. But he played like a great back in all three phases of the game. Their last guy Benson couldn’t do anything with the Bears and the guy before that (Thomas Jones) ran great and blocked well but wasn’t much of a receiver.

See unlike you I have intelligent things to say about guys like Payton and Forte and Singletary and so on.

You don’t (at least I’ve never seen it) so all you can do is nit pick and distort and ramble.

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 11:44 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Genius, genius, genius!
Great running backs do three things: They run, they block and they catch

Is a very intellegent comment. My hat goes off to you.

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 11:55 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Actually, they either run at a HOF level or they do all the other things well. Or they’re like Payton who fit into both catagories.

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 12:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

“You and "Josh from Hollywood" are funny (but sorely misinformed).”

All I said was that the Bears only won one Super Bowl in the past half-century. If this is really misinformation, please direct me to the proof of Chicago’s other Super Bowl win(s).

As a wise man once said, “Check my facts on the Bears and you’ll see that I’m correct”.

Check out The Examined Life. Or don't. Whatever.
"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f**kin' amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK

by Josh from Hollywood on Dec 30, 2008 5:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes Josh, you’re right. The Bears have only won one Super Bowl. Maveric_87 made a comment about a “classic Bears team where the offense sucks” and I simply pointed out that they led the NFC in scoring when they won it all. Few people know that. The difference between the 85 Bears and the 2000 Ravens is that the Bears had an excellant offense and the Ravens had a terrible offense. Sometime people think that if one side of the ball is great than the other side must suck. That’s not always true.

Just like with the Super Bowl Niners. Most people outside of SF thought they were a great offense and not much on defense when in fact they always played excellent, in not dominating defense.

It would be nice if you could correct people here or have an honest exchange of ideas but too many people just make wise ass remarks.

The point, for any Niners fan going forward, is that Singletary knew just how important the offense was in Chicago and certainly isn’t going to “ignore” it in SF.

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 6:13 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

“It would be nice if you could correct people here or have an honest exchange of ideas but too many people just make wise ass remarks.”

You mean like calling people “MORON”, “IDIOT”, and “SOB”?

Check out The Examined Life. Or don't. Whatever.
"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f**kin' amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK

by Josh from Hollywood on Dec 30, 2008 6:17 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Correction:

It was STUPID SOB.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Dec 30, 2008 6:44 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, they bring that on. When I start saying things like that it’s long past time.

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 6:51 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The Bears

Did they do anything after they won the 1 SB in 85? Nope. I want a team thats going to make to the playoffs regularly and not burn out after they win 1 SB.

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Dec 30, 2008 5:49 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

There has to be balance

Good on Defense and Offense. That 85 Bears team was known for the Defense it played. Payton was near the end of his career. I don’t want a team thats going to be 1 and done. I do not want a team thats built purely on defense. It has to be balanced. That is how teams last.

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Dec 30, 2008 5:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The Bears

Have only come close to an SB or SB win twice after 85. They lost to the 9ers in the Championship and to the Colts in the SB. They lost to the Colts because the offense sucked! Grossman sucked!

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Dec 30, 2008 6:05 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Dude, don’t you LISTEN? They led the NFC in scoring. McMahon was a GREAT QB!

Now, before you show your ignorance regarding the last comment about McMahon, let me tell you what the great Steve Young is ON RECORD SAYING: "Everything I (Steve Young) learned about playing quarteback I learned from watching Jim (at BYU).

Payton, McMahon, Gault, McKinnon and Moorehead would ALL start on most teams today (including the Niners).

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 6:28 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

McMahon

A great QB? No

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Dec 30, 2008 6:31 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't care what Steve Young said either

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Dec 30, 2008 6:32 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

And ofcourse Payton would start

I never said he wasn’t any good he’s one of the greatest ever. I simply said that Payton was near the end of his career when they won the SB.

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Dec 30, 2008 6:34 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

And for your info

The Chargers lead in total offense in 85. The Bears didn’t even break the top 5 in the Super Bowl year.

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Dec 30, 2008 6:38 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

scoring

Geomak said they lead the NFC in scoring, which they did (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/1985/)

Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!

by Fooch on Dec 30, 2008 6:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Correct but

They were not about the offense thats what I was trying to say.

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Dec 30, 2008 6:43 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

gotcha

Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!

by Fooch on Dec 30, 2008 6:45 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The 9ers need to be balanced.

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Dec 30, 2008 6:45 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks Fooch. I’m checking out of here pretty soon. I have only tried to set some things straight and to reassure people that Singletary doesn’t believe in “three yards and a cloud of dust.”

Like Rick Pitino once said “Larry Bird’s not walking through that door. Neither is Kevin McHale.”

Bill Walsh is long gone. If Singletary is able to come close to replicating in SF what he had in Chicago (and I know he can from a coaching standpoint, it’s personnel that’s the issue) you guys in SF won’t be disappointed.

It will be a kick ass, winning football team. They might look different than Walsh’s team, but the results will be in the same ballpark.

After what you guys have been through recently, I think most of you will take it.

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 6:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Bears

So are you strictly a Bears fan? I never quite got that clear. If so, have you checked out our Bears blog? (http://www.windycitygridiron.com/)

Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!

by Fooch on Dec 30, 2008 6:51 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The Bears

I’m not going to another blog. I’ve pissed off enough people here (LOL).

I was born and raised in Chicago. I was a Buddy Ryan fan and I believe in defense first. I moved out to Phoenix in 94 when Buddy got the HC job in Phoenix.

I follow all of Buddy’s boys like Jeff Fisher. I couldn’t understand why Singletary wasn’t hired in Atlanta and Dallas (boy, I bet JJ sure wishes he had Singletary now, now that “old softee Wade” has vowed to get tougher with his Out of Control Players."

Oh God, that’s too funny.

I couldn’t understand why Mike was an assistant and a guy like Nolan was the HC.

I have watched all of the Niner’s games under Singletary and actually am really enjoying watching him put his stamp on your team.

It really sucks that one of our own is not coaching the Bears but instead coaching the “hated” 49’ers (LOL).

I can’t STAND that Tampa 2 BS that Lovie Smith coaches. Plus he’s one of those player coaches like his mentor Dungy instead of a “drill sergeant” like Singletary and his mentor’s Ditka and Ryan

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 7:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The Tampa 2 BS

you talk about has a Super Bowl attached to it. Just as many as your precious Bears.

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Dec 30, 2008 7:19 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Tampa 2

Dude. Seriously. Are you just trying to annoy me? Really. Is that what you’re doing?

I don’t care how many Super bowls were won using it. I can’t stand it. OK! I have that right, don’t I?

The Bears might have made the playoffs this year if they had actually sacked the QB a few times.

Growing up watching all out agression by guys like Butkus and later Singletary’s 46 defense leaves a LOT of Bear fans longing for the good old days after having to watch the “passive” Tampa Two in action.

And please stop trying to annoy me. I have been warned about some of my language.
I posted a response to Fooch and then you get in my face with a sarcastic comment about my “precious Bears.”

You are starting S**T with me. Stop it.

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 7:59 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Here’s what’s wrong with the Tampa 2.

http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d80dc478e

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 8:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Mcmahon still stinks

The End

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Dec 30, 2008 6:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You’re wrong and I’m right (God what a surprise).
Check Fooch’s post below.

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 6:52 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You’re right. Why listen to Steve Young when we have YOU to listen to. God. That’s incredible.

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 6:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Him?

Sorry I guess I thought I was god.

Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!

by Fooch on Dec 30, 2008 6:44 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

That’s cause you don’t know football. If McMahon had gone to a warm weather/dome passing team instaed of a cold weather running team he would have had totals like he had when he set some 71 records at BYU.

The fact of the matter, beyond that, is this. Do you remember when Singletary was talking about Shaun Hill after he made him the starter? He talked not about things like height and arm strength but more on the intangibles like heart and intelligence and things like that.

What made McMahon, beyond his passing skills, were those kind od intangibles along with his ability to read defenses.

But let me ask you this. How many games did you watch when McMahon was the QB?

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 6:41 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

How many SB's did Mcmahon win?

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Dec 30, 2008 6:44 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Mcmahon was great lol

Oh yea he was awsome! 100 tds and 90 ints in his career.

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Dec 30, 2008 6:48 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You want to know how great Mcmahon was?

His career stats are almost identical to Trent Dilcraps

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Dec 30, 2008 6:51 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

He played for about a hundred teams after the Bears. Check out his Bear stats. BTW How many games have you seen him play? Thought so. Next you’ll be telling me that guys like Namath and Unitas weren’t great QB’s cause of stats.

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 7:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Good lord

You don’t look at stats with 1 team you look at the career as a whole. Mcmahon is no better than Dilcrap.

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Dec 30, 2008 7:15 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Comparing McMahon

to Unitas and Namath has got to be some kind of sin.

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Dec 30, 2008 7:18 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Comparisons

Again, you misconstrue my point. Namath’s Jets won one of the greatest Super Bowls in modern history. His stats that day were very mediocre as they ran the ball to death.

It would be easy for some people to downplay Namath’s day due to his “stats.”

Yet he is widely considered to having been the key factor in the game. That perception started with his famous “guarantee” and continued with his almost error free game.

There’s a whole lot more to the game of football than stats.

For example, Singletary’s “stats” show him at 5-4. And yet that stat doesn’t show at all the way he has changed the teams attitude.

Regarding McMahon, I will leave you with this. Years ago, Mike Ditka said something that I had long been saying. That the “missing ingredient” for the Bears winning the Super Bowl was Jim McMahon. They had always had a great defense and Walter had been there for a long time. It wasn’t till McMahon came in with his leadership skills and passing ability that they really turned the corner. So said Iron Mike.

I know, I know. What Ditka has said about McMahon is just as meaningless as what Steve Young has said about him.

Only the bloggers here know the REAL truth!

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 8:08 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Intelligence isn’t really an intangible. It’s more of a semi-tangible. It actually is relatively quantifiable. Not always satisfactorily, but still.

And of course he wouldn’t talk about height and arm strength. Why in the world would he talk about the guy’s deficiencies?

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Dec 30, 2008 6:47 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Weren't most, or at least some of, McMahon's records broken by Ty Detmer?

Detmer wasn’t much of an NFL QB. I’d expect that someone who’s been watching NFL football for 40 years would understand that college records and stats has little to do with the NFL.

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 7:52 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If McMahon had gone to a warm weather/dome passing team instaed of a cold weather running team he would have had totals like he had when he set some 71 records at BYU.

Play the hand you’re dealt, not the hand you wish was dealt.

"He called the sh** POOP!" -- Adam Sandler

by JRPhillips on Jan 1, 2009 1:11 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

My mom dated McMahon

Well that’s what my dad tells me anyways.

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 7:49 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Know why? Do you really want to know, cause I’ll tell you. They fielded pretty much the same team in 86 as in 85. The big difference is that Buddy Ryan left for Philly. So, Ditka brought in the GM’s (BIllTobin) brother (Vince Tobin) to coach the defense

Ditka was so resentful of Ryan that he had Tobin scrap the 46 defense and play a soft “bend don’t break” type of defense. The players on the defense were so good (after having been together under Buddy Ryan for so long) that they actually gave up LESS points in 86 than in 85. Not many, but a few. But, in the playoffs they couldn’t dominate on defense. In 85 the Bears became the only team in history to shut out two teams in the playoffs (the Giants and the Rams). In the playoffs under Tobin, they couldn’t blitz and dominate and wreak havoc like they did under Buddy.

I have always maintained that the Bears would have been better off having Singletary as a “player coach” for the defense (like he pretty much was under Ryan) than bringing in a guy like Tobin to run a non-agressive scheme. As Otis Wilson said years later about the scheme: “We didn’t like it.” Period.

That’s why they didn’t win more. If Buddy had stayed there or if they had kept running his scheme they probably would have won 2 or 3. Imagine if Bill Walsh left after the first Super Bowl and the new coach said that the Niners weren’t going to run the West Coast offense (even though the players knew it in their sleep).

That, my friends, is what happened to Singletary’s Bears after 85.

Please, if you have stupid, wise ass remarks, keep them to yourself. If you have an intelligent question or comment I’m all ears.

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 6:24 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Do you ever listen to Fooch when he tells people not to insult others?

Whats the matter with you?

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Dec 30, 2008 6:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

That’s not insulting you. I didn’t say that you were stupid or a wise ass. I simply said that I get tired of insulting, wise ass comments. OK!

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 6:37 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Bad news...

You’re on a blog. A blog will be full of wise ass comments. If you don’t like it, then you are using the right medium for discussion.

"He called the sh** POOP!" -- Adam Sandler

by JRPhillips on Jan 1, 2009 1:15 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I...

fought fire with fire and I got banned at McCovey Chronicles. Totally learned my lesson because I know I am a better person than those people.

"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Jan 1, 2009 1:34 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You do realize a number of people on NN are of the McCoven, right?

I’m saying that if you don’t expect a certain level of snark and comical responses to things you say, you’re basically going to a blog already screwed.

"He called the sh** POOP!" -- Adam Sandler

by JRPhillips on Jan 1, 2009 1:57 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes,

I do realize that. I trust in Fooch and Howtheyscored. They’ve got things squared away here.

"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Jan 1, 2009 2:03 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Um...

That should actually read you are using the WRONG medium for discussion.

"He called the sh** POOP!" -- Adam Sandler

by JRPhillips on Jan 1, 2009 1:55 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Shanahan

I no it won’t happen, but it’d be pretty bad ass to see Shanahan back as offensive coordinator in SF. Considering what he’s done with some late round running backs, I bet Gore could be even more filthy.

Of course, I’d suspect Singletary would be looking for a younger name. I guess we’ll see.

Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!

by Fooch on Dec 30, 2008 2:51 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

Zampese

I’m looking into that with our Bengals blogger and whatever else I can find. Definitely more to come.

Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!

by Fooch on Dec 30, 2008 3:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I wish he was the HC here...

Watch a team like DAL snatch him up, or even SD if they decide to can Turner. Watch the 49ers grab Turner if he does get canned.

The San Francisco Yorkie9ers.

Lather.Rinse.Repeat.

by drummer on Dec 30, 2008 2:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Really?

I’m sure Shanahan could do some good things in Dallas, but he was a .500 coach in Denver the last 3 seasons.

Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!

by Fooch on Dec 30, 2008 2:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

He was a worse GM than HC...

And his defense is horrid, but he is still one of the premier football minds in the League. He had what, 7 RBs on IR this season? He turns no-name backs into studs. Gore would have a monster year with Shanny. Continuity of offense? There you have it.

by drummer on Dec 30, 2008 3:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

one issue

There remains the issue of losing him to a head coaching job sooner rather than later. This is also assuming he’s not hired as a head coach but NOT GM somewhere else. I think you hit the nail on the head that he was a worse GM than HC.

Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!

by Fooch on Dec 30, 2008 3:03 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

According to Jed...

And I take that for what it’s worth.

by drummer on Dec 30, 2008 3:13 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

As opposed to what he did with the 9 weeks he was running the team?

There were no personnel changes aside from removing Nolan and promoting Singletary, and look at the difference in the teams before and after that switch.

by mikev on Dec 30, 2008 3:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

And it still doesn't add up..

To what Shanahan has done in the League.

by drummer on Dec 30, 2008 3:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

What's your point?

You think that SF should have strung Singletary along JUST IN CASE a guy like Shannahan got fired, which is something that nobody saw coming?

by mikev on Dec 30, 2008 3:36 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You're the one bringing Sing up..

In this conversation. This is the reality: Shanny is more proven than Sing. That’s my point. If you don’t like that, then fine. Sing was gonna be the HC of this team after the Jets game. They decided that long before his meeting with the 49er brass. He really didn’t earn it as much as they thought he was “the safe choice”.

Again, if you don’t like this, fine.

by drummer on Dec 30, 2008 3:43 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

There's nothing to like or dislike.

There’s no scenario in which Shannahan could have become the Head Coach — he was fired AFTER Singletary was hired.

Frankly I’m not concerned with how proven a guy is. If he’s not surrounded with the right personnel or players, he’s not going to be successful.

by mikev on Dec 30, 2008 5:19 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Go back and read this...

In fact, I’ll paste it for you…

 That’s why I wanted Shanny as HC…For years now.

Notice the word “years”. Not just today. Not just yesterday. Not just last year.

BTW, Sing has one less assistant than he had “yesterday”. On “offense”.

by drummer on Dec 30, 2008 5:27 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

ELWAY

Here’s the central question. There’s no doubt that Shanahan is an excellent coach. But what has he won without Elway? Nothing. In my personal list of the best “modern day” QB’s I put Elway as #1. Even those that disagree with putting him at #1 would almost certainly put him in their top 5.

That becomes the central question. How much of Shanahan’s success is due to having Elway as his QB? Considering that Shanahan hasn’t won anything since, and that he has NEVER fielded an “above average defense” I’d say a lot.

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 4:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Shanny since Elway..

Has only one losing season, and gone to the playoffs 4 times, with Griese and Plummer as QBs.

That’s what he has done.

by drummer on Dec 30, 2008 5:04 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Actually, in the decade since Elway has been gone, Shanahan is 1 -4 (look it up). Don’t disparage Plummer as Plummer led the pathetic Cardinals to their only playoff win (in Dallas of all places) in a hundred years.

You just helped make my point (thank you). Since Elway has been gone in the past 10 years, Shanahan has won exactly ONE playoff game. This despite him being in COMPLETE CONTROL of player personnel (which means he can’t blame anybody else since he personally chose his players).

Thanks again for confirming my point. One playoff win in a decade is the same as the Arizona Cardinals. HAHAHAHAHA!

I guess Shanahan REALLY did miss MR. ELWAY!

Next time you’re going to open your mouth, try engaging your brain first (LOL)!!!!

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 5:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

LOL, did Elway win..

A championship without Shanahan?

I know you love to act confused, given your absolute lack of understanding of the NFL, but try not to project it on others.

Although it’s fun watching you make a fool of yourself.

by drummer on Dec 30, 2008 5:31 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Elway retired you F’ing MORON!

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 5:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

What does Elway retiring...

Have anything to do with he winning his only 2 SB rings with Shanny?

Oh, I forget, I’m talking football with you.

by drummer on Dec 30, 2008 5:42 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Ummmm

Everything drummer said is true and you did nothing to refute him. Shanny has had one losing season and been to the play-offs four times. That’s all he said, and those statements are true I don’t know why you think he should engage his brain?

And I think it’s a bit disingenuous to blast Shanny for not winning a Super Bowl without Elway. I mean how many Super Bowls did Jimmy Johnson win with out Aikman? How many did Ditka win without Payton? For that matter how many did Elway win without Shannahan?

by DiegoAsFan on Dec 30, 2008 5:32 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

GeoMak's brain.

is only admired by his proctologist.

by drummer on Dec 30, 2008 5:36 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Dude. I actually thought you (DiegoAsFan) were intelligent. Guess I was wrong. Drummer’s comments , while true, were spoken in SUPPORT of Shanahan’s record post Elway.

I simply stated that Shanahan hasn’t won anything (except one playoff game) in a decade without Elway. He’s won EXACTLY the same amount of playoffs games, post Elway, as have the pathetic Arizona Cardinals. Think about that statement for a second. Not exactly something to brag about.

Also, his comment about Griese and Plummer.

A) Shanahan brought in Griese and Plummer. They weren’t forced upon him by a GM.
B) Don’t disparage Plummer. Plummer led the Cardinals to their last playoff game (as he did with the Broncos).

Get it now. While his “stats” were correct, his conclusion was incorrect, at least for me (and apparently for Pat Bowlen)!

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 5:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

The conclusion is...

His winning percentage, meaning he won more games than he lost, even post Elway.

by drummer on Dec 30, 2008 5:45 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

That means NOTHING. To teams like the Lions and Bengals maybe. After you’ve won a couple of Super Bowls all that matters are playoff wins and Super Bowls. You guys in S.F., of all places, should know that.

Pat Bowlen didn’t fire Shanahan cause he didn’t win enough games. He fired him because he didn’t win enough PLAYOFF games!

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 6:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

And ...

Pat Bowlen would have never won 2 Super Bowls without Shanahan.

Of course we know about Super Bowls. Shananan was the OC here when they won the last one.

by drummer on Dec 30, 2008 6:02 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, overall Shanahan was pretty successful

14 years in Denver, 7 play-off appearances and 2 Super Bowl wins. 8-5 record in the play-offs and 138-86 record overall.

Yea, his record wasn’t as good after Elway retired but he still won more than he lost. Its obviously going to be tougher without Elway than with him. Maybe it’s his fault he get an adequate replacement for him but that speaks more to his GM ability rather than his coaching ability.

by DiegoAsFan on Dec 30, 2008 6:19 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You should really stop saying not to disparage Plummer because he went to the playoffs in one year. I’m as big of a Plummer booster as anybody (believe me), but his track record was terrible, his confidence was shot, and his fundamentals were completely down the drain when he landed in Denver.

Shanahan did FAR more for Plummer than Plummer did for Shanahan. That seems pretty clear to me.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Dec 30, 2008 6:56 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

Plummers time at Arizone ruined him. Should’ve been a 9er.

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Dec 30, 2008 7:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I wasn't even knocking...

Plummer. That’s GeoMak’s “interpretation” of my post. I was saying that Shanny won with QB’s considerably “less elite” than Elway.

by drummer on Dec 30, 2008 7:02 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Come on Dude, get real. He won ONE playoff game in a decade! One.

That, as I said, is the same as the Cardinals.

Did he win regular season games. of course. I never said he was a terrible coach or that they were a terrible team.

All I said was that, after Elway, he was a Very Average Coach. That’s all. The record bears that out.

In cities where the team has won multiple Super Bowls, like Denver and SF among others, I don’t think the owner or fans care how many regular season games were won in a decade where they’ve won exactly ONE playoff game.

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 9:47 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Again..

Denver didn’t win a Super Bowl until Shanny got there. It’s also very rare for a HC to wear the GM hat successfully. Shanahan is still considered an elite HC, and he will be one of the hot guys on the market. He still produces great offenses, RBs out of nowhere, and is one of the best tacticians in the game today. He isn’t a retread like Ditka was with NO, a reach who blew an entire draft with arrogance.

You give him a team, with he just being the HC, and they are contenders. That’s what a good coach does.

by drummer on Dec 30, 2008 10:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Actually, Great OC’s produce great offenses, plug in running backs and are great tacticians. Great HC’s produce on both sides of the ball.

Think back to Walsh’s Niners (who always had a top rated defense). Or Parcells with Simms and company on offense.

As far as the HC GM thing, you’re obviously missing the point that Shanahan INSISTED on those terms for his employment. If you’re going to demand total control, you only have yourself to blame (for things like never having a top rated defense).

Fact is, in the last decade as HC and GM, his team has been almost invisible in the playoffs (one division win and one playoff win).

He’s really just an elite OC dressed up as a HC.

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 11:31 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You do realize..

That prior to the last 2 years, the Donks have ranked in the top 10-15 on defense between 2002-2006, don’t you? They were 4th overall in 2004.

Why is it you fail at this?

BTW, Walsh as GM in 1999-2001:

Had one year with the defense ranked above 15th overall, with the other 2 years at around the bottom of the League. Then, he capped the team out which hurt the team even worse.

Good luck with, well, whatever ails you.

by drummer on Dec 31, 2008 12:12 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Rankings are great. The facts is this. They’ve gone through multiple defensive coordinators and never had a an above average defense for any sustained period of time under Shanahan. Shanahan’s drafting, at least on the defensive side of the ball has been mostly terrible for the past decade.

I’ll phrase it this way for you. The Cowboys haven’t won a playoff game in 12 years. Think the people in Dallas are happy that they’ve won a lot of regular season games and gone to the playoffs in the past 12 years? I don’t. You’d be hard pressed to find 5 fans in Dallas that are happy with the past 12 years. The Cowboys have won 3 Super Bowls. What’s the “missing ingredient” from the 3 Super Bowls and the past 12 years? Jimmy Johnson. Johnson’s drafts and coaching.

What’s the “missing ingredient” with the two Bronco Super Bowls and the past 10 years of mediocrity under Shanahan’s complete control? John Elway.

If you can’t understand that not only don’t you know much about football by you aren’t very good with concepts like logic and deductive reasoning.

Good luck brushing up on those things!

BTW: In a strange way I almost admire people like you. You’ll fight to the bitter end. Anyone tring to make a case for Shanahan’s defense over his Long, Long tenure there is some that JUST WON"T GIVE UP! Nobody can ever call you a quitter.

Fact is, sometimes in life, this saying serves us well: If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it’s probably a duck.

Shanahan:

Great offensive mind
Great at finding and making 1000 yard rushers.
Had mostly average (at best) defenses to go along with his above average offenses.
Overall not good at drafting players (especially on the defense side of the ball)
After his HOF QB left a decade ago, exactly ONE playoff win.
One playoff win in a decade might cut it with the Cardinals, Bengals and browns, but it doesn’t cut it in place like Denver and Dallas.

Quack Quack!

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 8:10 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

So play-off wins make a coach above average?

I don’t know when that became the requirement but it doesn’t cast too bright a light on two of the guys you’ve been championing.

Buddy Ryan never won a play-off game at all and Mike Ditka won 2 in 11 years after ’85. And both these guys had worse overall records in the regular season and the play-offs.

Or is the point that Shanahan isn’t a hard-ass and had poor play-off production during a portion of his coaching career?

by DiegoAsFan on Dec 30, 2008 10:08 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Dude, you’re smarter than this. You really are. All I am saying is that Shanahan inherited Elway and finally got him a great RB in Terrel Davis, and won two Super Bowls with those guys. Good coaching by Shanny. And in the ten years since, his record for a multiple Super Bowl winning team has been underwhelming at best. That’s all.

Why did he fail? He demanded complete control, and through poor drafting he failed to build up a quality defense. His three QB’s (Griese, Plummer and Cutler) never quite measured up.

Buddy Ryan (unlike Shanahan) completely built up the eagles from a terrible team to a quality team. They had a dominating defense and a prolific offense. Yes, they lost all three playoff games.

Ditka’s problem was that after 85, his resentment caused him and his new DC to abandon Buddy’s pressure defense in favor of a “read and react” defense. That defense, while adaquate in the regular season, failed miserably in the playoffs.

Tell you what though. Don Banks on SI.com wrote this:

Nine winning seasons, seven playoff berths and three conference championships in 14 years certainly sounds impressive, but the reality is that Shanahan never remotely approached the same level of success with any of the other quarterbacks who followed Elway after their four-year stint together.

Not Brian Griese, who the Broncos lavished with a huge contract and then parted ways with shortly thereafter. Not the erratic Jake Plummer, who Shanahan acquired from Arizona and then gave up on following his AFC title game loss to Pittsburgh. And not Jay Cutler, the current Denver quarterback and 2006 first-round pick who has both tantalized and tormented the longtime Broncos coach with his own inconsistent ways.

For most of the past 10 years, the Broncos have been NFL enigmas, capable of playing great for short spurts of almost every season, but never again finding the personnel combination and chemistry that served to bring them their only two NFL championships in 1997-98. And the blame for that has finally landed on the shoulders of Shanahan, who has always been pretty much a one-man show in Denver, calling almost every shot.

He’s saying what I’ve been saying all along.

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 11:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Shanny is no..

Jauron or Wannstedt, that’s for sure.

by drummer on Dec 31, 2008 12:16 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

No one said he was. Jauron’s a better coach in my opinion than Wanny. Both coached the Bears and Jauron was much better there.

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 8:15 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

OMG. Shanny Refused Staff Changes

This just in. It’s being reported that Shanahan refused Pat Bowlen’s request to change his defensive staff and coordinator after a tear of terrible defense.

What a great HC!

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 8:33 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

"What a great HC!"

Agreed! By not selling out Bowlen, Shanahan took the blame for the poor defense. All great HC make some bad decisions and letting Denver’s defense erode away into nothingness was Shanahan’s. I’d imagine that’s not some Shanahan is going to let happen again. You live, you learn, you move on and as a head coach you remain accountable for your coordinators.

How’s a coach supposed to keep his players accountable if he doesn’t keep himself accountable? Shanahan got fired because he didn’t want to deflect the problems with the defense onto Bowlen and I give him props for that and I suspect his players in the future will as well.

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 8:42 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You KILL me methodrampage. You really do. In a strange way I’ve come to admire you.

GeoMak: The Sky is Blue.
Method: Define Blue.
Geo: Well the sky looks like the color blue to me.
Method: Well “looks like” is SUBJECTIVE, you know.
(and so on this goes to infinity)!

BTW: On an average day, ask 100 people what color the sky is and you’ll get 100 “BLUES.”

P.S. methodrampage “Define Average.”

You KILL me. Really. OMG!

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 9:11 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'll ask 100 people tonight

And they’ll all probably say black.

On a seperate note, does a lonely, bored 40-50-60 year old man really say “OMG!”?

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 9:17 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Keep ‘em coming Sparky. I’ve got nothing to do today so I’ll keep listening and responding to your complete ignorance. Just today.

After today, I’ve got to let this go with a few guys like you that don’t have a clue. So, give it your best shot today.
Throw out all your nonsense at me.

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 9:50 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

BTW

I meant Bob Slowik, not Bowlen. Got the two confused in all my haste.

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 9:28 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Romanowski Just Confirms My Point

OMG. Romo just said today what I said yesterday, that “Shanahan hasn’t had MUCH success since Elway.”

OMG. I’ve got Bronco players backing my point (and disagreeing with you “geniuses.” Too Funny!

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 9:07 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Because Romanowski is a real credible source?

I couldn’t have though of a less credible source, expect maybe you.

We’ve already proven with his record since Elway left that Shanahan has indeed been successful maybe not as successful but successful none the less.

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 9:19 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

No. No. He’s Not. Just like when I said that Steve Young is on record as saying that “Everything I (Steve Young) learned about playing Quarterback, I learned from Jim McMahon.”

Now, that’s a DIRECT QUOTE from Steve. And of course, one of you guys said “Who cares about what Steve Young said.”

So, you’re right. Ex-players and coaches and analysts aren’t “credible sources.”

Just (some) of you bloggers here!

OMG. You guys KILL me. You really do!

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 9:44 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You really don't see the disconnect there?

First off, are you really comparing the credibility of Young and Romanowski? If you are, I think you’ve said enough.

Secondly the quote your pulling from Young,

"Everything I (Steve Young) learned about playing Quarterback, I learned from Jim McMahon."

when taken at face value, does little to prove that McMahon was a great QB. I not neccessarily saying that this is whats happening here but it’s completely possible that McMahon had a great mind but not the skills to be a great QB. A lot of guys are great teachers but poor players.

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 10:33 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Disconnect

Again with your “twisted logic.” As human beings and as family men, I find Steve Young to be among the most credible. That said, he’s just a player like Romo. Call me stupid, but I’ll always take a players version over a bloggers.

Next. I’ve got a friend that played with the Cowboys alongside Irvin and Emmitt and Troy.

Sorry, but I’ll take his opinion, regarding those guys, over yours any day of the week. But I know how you work. You’d say, well, your friend wasn’t a pro bowl player, or your friend didn’t win a SB in Dallas so he’s not credible. You KILL me. You really do. See, you’ve got an ANSWER for everything. Unfortunately, they rarely make sense!

Young and McMahon. It’s a simple statement among others he’s made about Jim. You’re right, that statement in and of itself doesn’t “prove” anything.

Just like when Ditka said that McMahon was the “missing ingredient” for the Bears to win it all which doesn’t prove anything.

Tell you what does though. Someone such as myself who WATCHED McMahon play and help lead the Bears to the SB. And who read all the comments by his teammates praising his abilities over the years (similar to the “player praise” Singletary recently received).

And comments by guys like young and Ditka, among others.

And comment by competitors and opposing coaches. I’ve got a ton of stuff on DVD. I’d be happy to burn you a disc so you could hear it for yourself.

But mostly son, it’s by WATCHING HIM PLAY AND LEAD HIS TEAM, something I’m guessing you rarely if ever have done.

Keep it coming. You’re not very knowledgable or bright but you are persistent. I will defintetly give you that much!

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 11:13 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

We're dumb but persistent

That should be the Niners Nation motto.

As far as McMahon goes I don’t think I’ve ever said he was a bad quarterback. Honestly I think he was a solid QB but I do think you drastically overstated his abilities when you called him a great QB. Maybe in your mind he is a great QB, however, I among other disagree. And we can argue back and forth all day about how much each other knows about football and such and whether your assessment of McMahon based on watching him is actually worth a damn or not but we probably wouldn’t get anywhere. I will how ever throw some stats out there for you.

McMahon Career Highs:
Passing Yards: 2,392
TD: 15
Completion %: 60.4
Games Started (in 1 season) 14

It’s tough to look at McMahon’s career averages simply because the rarely started more than 10 games a season. But I think Completion % over his career is still an decent measuring stick (58 %).

First off, I rule McMahon lack of consistent starts as the first determining factor against his being a “Great QB”. In my mind a “Great QB” needs to start more than 10 games a season with a little more consistency. In my mind most, if not all, “Great QB’s” throw for more than 2,400 yards and 15 TDs as career highs and have completion % over 58. Simply from a statistical standpoint McMahon isn’t anything special and is far from great.

Granted there is more to play the QB position then just putting up big numbers but McMahon’s numbers are so inconsistent he’s a tough sell as a “Great QB”. A good one, maybe. A great one, no.

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 11:33 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Dumb

No, not Niners Nation. Just a select few like you.

There you go again DISTORTING MY WORDS. I said YOU were not knowledgable or bright but persistent and you turn that into me saying “Niner’s Nation” was dumb.

See, you just MAKE THINGS UP to suit your purpose.

You are not honest. You Lie. Congratulations! It speaks to your character!

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 11:48 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You twist things

Did I ever say you called all of Niners Nation dumb? Did I ever quote you as saying such a thing? If I didn’t how can I be twisting your words or lying?

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 11:58 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Twist

We’re dumb but persistent. That should be the Niners Nation motto.

Since you’re obviously referencing me with the “dumb and persistent” part, your use of the words WE"RE and NINERS NATION would clearly imply more than one person (you) and would clearly imply that I was speaking of Niner’s Nation.

You “slyly and indirectly” misquoted me.

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 12:03 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I said it

You can insinuate all you want but I never said you called all of Niners Nation “dumb but persistent”. I also never misquoted you. Please stop with your empty claims.

You have however called multiple people names such a stupid SOB, a moron, an idiot, etc. in addition to describing some as persistent.

If one felt so inclined they could probably form a decent enough argument that with the abundance of name calling you’ve done that in fact you have called most of Niners Nation “dumb but persistent”. However, I have not and will not make that argument.

Life’s worst burden in a guilty conscience.

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 1:26 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You Said It.

I never said thet you DIRECTLY put those words into my mouth. By grouping words such as dumb and persistent and we’re and Niners Nation you INDIRECTLY did.

That’s simple English. I know you don’t know much about the NFL but you do understand simple English!

For the LAST TIME.

How many games have you EVER watched of Jim McMahon?

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 1:57 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

McMahon

You really don’t know. You really don’t.

Intangibles don’t show up on the scorecard. Regarding McMahon “throwing his body around like a linebacker . . . Ditka’s words, not mine.” ex SMU, Patriots and Colts HC Ron Meyer said " Is that smart? No. Does it win games? You bet it does."

See methodrampage, I put far more stock into what guys like Ditka and Meyer and Steve Young (among many, many others) and my own eyes after having watched his entire career than I do in your opinion. Sorry!

See take your “stats” and shove them. Stat wise (as I said yesterday) Singletary was 5-4 in the interim. Intangible wise, he was closer to 9-0.

You don’t know what you’re talking about cause you weren’t there (in Chicago) and you don’t have tons of stuff on DVD from CREDIBLE SOURCES LIKE DITKA AND YOUND AND MEYER AND MANY MANY OTHERS.

Honestly, tell me this (I know that it’s hard for you to be honest but try): How many games have you seen McMahon play?

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 11:56 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

How the great "He's a winner arguement"

Vince Young, the modern day Jim McMahon.

You’re right I’m not looking at Jim McMahon thru dark navy and orange tinted glasses. I’m looking at his stats objectively and they don’t impress me.

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 12:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Argument

Nobody, least of all me, cares what you think of Mac. BTW, still waiting. How many games, if ever, have you seen him play.

Man up and HONESTLY answer the question, or chicken out and ignore it or lie!

BTW: he was great, not only for his leadership skills but for his ability to call a game and his passing skills. Anyone with an OUNCE of INTELLIGENCE would easily understand that, like Phil Simms, their stats playing QB for “running, conservative” coaches like Ditka and Parcells and in cold weather places would obviously suffer when compared to warm weather passing offenses like Montana, Young and Marino.

Ever hear of a concept called COMMON SENSE?

But please tell me how many games of his you watched, Mr. methodrampage!

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 12:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

None that I can remember

Then again, we’re talking 15-20 years ago so I wouldn’t put too much stock in what you think you remember.

McMahon just wasn’t all that, and far from great. The stats support me on this and you really haven’t proven otherwise. You claim people have said that he was but I haven’t seen any edivence and the burden of proof is on you.

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 1:38 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Plus all I really said was that McMahon was a solid quarterback just not great.

I don’t know what you’re definition of great is but to me Marino, Elway, Montana and Fouts were great QB’s. While guys like Esiason, Jaworski, Simms and Moon (all of who I’d rank ahead of McMahon) were very good QB’s.

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 1:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

None that I can Remember

I’ll be HAPPY to, in the Very Near Future, put together a “DVD’” with those and other quotes in it.

See, here’s what you’re doing when it come to McMahon. It would be like somone, NOT WATCHING ANY Niners games this year, and then hearing that their record was 7-9.

And then saying “Typical RECENT 49’ers season.”

See, that’s just based on numbers and stats. This season was ANYTHING but typical for the 49’ers (outside of the won/loss record) as they fired a coach in midstream and completely changed the teams mindset and attitude under Singletary.

One can only see and understand that by watching and not just by looking at the numbers.

Of course, as I said before, McMahon’s stats are going to be skewed by playing in the cold weather for a Run First coach. Also, I’m not talking about his complete career, when he was completely banged up. I’m talking about his years as a Bear, the prime years of his career.

Anyone that compares McMahon to Dilfer based on numbers CLEARLY doesn’t “get it.”

Maybe you know or have heard that McMahon and Ditka butted heads quite often in Chicago. One of the reasons for that was, early on, Ditka was kind of pissed off that McMahon didn’t spend HOURS and HOURS watching film like Staubach did in Dallas. The reason? McMahon had almost a photographic memory when it came to game situations. All he needed was to see things ONCE on film and then he knew what to do. He was like Bird and Gretzky that way. All those guys saw things better and faster than most players.

That was part of his “greatness.”
Nobody ever accused Dilfer of that ability.

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 2:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

All You Really Said

Were actually a bunch of wise ass remarks, not that he was a solid QB. Since I watched all of those guys and you haven’t here’s some info:

Marino, Elway, Montana, Fouts. Esiason and Moon were all in BASICALLY “pure passing offenses.”
Please don’t split hairs here cause at some point you have to generalize a “touch.”

Jaws, Simms and McMahon all played in far more conservative offenses.

ALL were excellent QB’s. OK! No dogs here.

Marino, Elway, Fouts, Moon and maybe Esiason all had “rocket type” arms. Montana, Jaws, Simms and Mac were just a cut below.

Jaws was an effecient, blue collar guy who at one point set a consecutive games streak. Simms and McMahon were similar in era, coaches and systems played in. McMahon was MUCH more of a vocal leader of his team than Simms. That’s not a slap against Simms. McMahon used to go out with his offensive lineman every Thursday to a restaurant/bar called the Prime Minister. He used to “head-butt” his lineman. Those things endeared him to those guys and helped forge an cohesiveness and identity on the offense.

Leadership like that CANNOT BE OVERSTATED. It’s why Ditka, along with myself, said that McMahon was the missing ingredient in their Super Bowl run. Payton and Buddy Ryan had been there for a while.

I have always said that about McMahon being the missing ingredient even though I was/am a HUGE Buddy Ryan/defensive football fan and I think (along with Ditka and others like John Madden) that Walter Payton was the greatest all around player in NFL history.

What the Bears were missing was an excellent passer and a LEADER on offense, A QB who was an excellent passer (as evidenced by his BYU days) and who could manage the game (not throw STUPID turnovers).

Here’s a story of McMahon’s “genius” as a QB. During one game, McMahon called an audible at the line of scrimmage and threw an easy touchdown pass to TE Emery Moorehead (whose son now plays for the Colts).

In the papers the next day, Moorehead was quoted as saying " I asked Jim how he knew he should audible to a pass cause the DB hadn’t moved towards the line tipping off a blitz. McMahon said that “he could see it in his eyes.”

I’ll translate that for you. Moorehead was somewhat incredulous that McMahon knew enough to audible into a play that would defeat the blitz because the DB hadn’t tipped his hane by creeping in and showing blitz. McMahon sais that he could "see it in his (the DB’s) eyes that he was about to blitz.

That, my friend, is great QB play. So much happens during a game that doesn’t show up in the “stat sheet” it’s not funny.

If a QB never threw more than a five yard pass he’d probably have an unbelievable completion percentage and almost no interceptions. Of course, his team would never win but, Hell, his stats would look good.

Knock him all you want. With all due respect, you really don’t know.

If you really want to learn I’d be happy to make and send you a DVD.

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 3:45 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

VY

What does Vince Young even REMOTELY have to do with Jim McMahon? What?

The ONLY thing they have in common is that were both praised, coming out of college, as being “Leaders” of their teams in college. That’s It!

Nothing else. Physically and Mentally they are almost polar opposites.

I could go on and on but I won’t waste my team.

That’s the Stupidist example imaginable!

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 12:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

STILL WAITING methodrampage

How many games of McMahon’s have you EVER watched?

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 12:24 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Funny

I was just skimming over the titles of these posts and not reading anything, but I did catch a few words as the page scrolled down…

I found myself wondering what Vince McMahon had to do with anything in this topic! LOL

Of course its difficult, its a shortcut... if it was easy it'd just be "the way."

by chirop1 on Dec 31, 2008 2:49 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Romanowski's credibility

Romanowski is the same guy who said after the drafting of Kyle Boller that him being able to throw 70+ yards from one knee speaks volumes of his character and leadership, and that it would translate well to the NFL. I knew that was a load the moment he said it.

I’ve never considered Romanowski a credible source.

"He called the sh** POOP!" -- Adam Sandler

by JRPhillips on Jan 1, 2009 1:32 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You do realize the NFL is designed to be cyclical

Teams aren’t meant to stay on top forever. Teams at the bottom aren’t meant to remain in the cellar forever.

A team that has won two Super Bowls, in back-to-back, years in supposed to suffer (that’s what drafting at back end of rounds will do to you).

Shanahan kept the Broncos highly competitive and has constructed one hell of an offense, which if Denver can pull a serviceable defense together they’ll quickly become one of the elite teams in the NFL because of what Shanahan has done with the offense (pulling guys like Culter, Marshall, Scheffler and then Clady and Royal later out of the same drafts is no small feat).

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 8:07 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Let me help you out here. What’s the biggest difference between YOUR Bill Walsh and Mike Shanahan.

Walsh always had excellent coaches on defense (like Seifert and Jeff Fisher among others and had top 10 defenses).

And, when Montana was aging Walsh “plucked” Steve Young from Tampa Bay. Pretty smart, huh?

Shanahan, unlike Walsh, ignored his defense at the expense of his offense and never could (unlike Walsh) even come close to replacing Elway.

BTW: I do realize the cyclical nature of the NFL. Tell you what though. Do some kind of “online poll” with the good people of Denver and Dallas and see if they are patient and understanding of their decade long playoff/SB drought as just being a by-product of a cyclical league?

Now, spend your time picking apart this post.

There’s an old saying about “Not seeing the forest for the trees.”

Walsh . . . real HC as a HC is responsible for Defense as well as Offense.
Walsh . . . real GM as he started replacing the LEGENDARY Joe Montana, while he could still play, with Young. That did cause some friction in the locker room, but it sure made for an easy transition.

Anybody that compares Shanahan to Walsh as an “overall” HC and as a GM is crazy. As an offensive “mind” yes, those comparisons are valid. Everything else, No Way!

 

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 8:26 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Please let's get real

BTW: I do realize the cyclical nature of the NFL. Tell you what though. Do some kind of "online poll" with the good people of Denver and Dallas and see if they are patient and understanding of their decade long playoff/SB drought as just being a by-product of a cyclical league?

Opinions from Denver’s and Dallas’ fans has little to do with anything. The facts are the facts. The NFL has shown to be pretty cyclical whether fans in any town find that an acceptable criteria to measure their team’s recent or past success on is completely irrelevant, their point of view simply doesn’t matter.

Walsh did make a smart move by nabbing Young. But Tampa Bay made the original smart move by drafting him out of the USFL, they just weren’t smart enough to hold onto him.

Anybody that compares Shanahan to Walsh as an "overall" HC and as a GM is crazy. As an offensive "mind" yes, those comparisons are valid. Everything else, No Way!

I never did this. Why are you even bringing this up in reply to one of my comments?

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 8:36 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Dude. 10 years is a F’ing DROUGHT in the NFL. I would think that the good people of SF would be the FIRST to confirm that.

I guess you must be one of those guys that long for the good old days of guys like Erickson and Nolan!

(Keep’em coming)!

Tampa: Please son. You make NO SENSE! What good is DRAFTING a guy if you dont’ KEEP the guy. They did the same thing with BO Jackson.

The more you talk the less sense you make. Now you’re “defending” Tampa Bay? God, where does it stop with you?

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 9:17 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Stop your nonsense

Stop putting words in people’s mouths.

I never defended Tampa, I criticized them for letting Young go.

10 years, a drought? What are we talking about here? Super Bowls? Because 10 years is far from a Super Bowl drought in the NFL.

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 9:23 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, it’s really easy to underestimate just how hard it is to be in the playoffs consistently and just how few playoff games are actually played every year.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Dec 31, 2008 9:34 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes you did. You said Tampa Bay made the original Smart Move.

If you buy a Rolls Royce for 10 thousand dollars, that’s smart. If you sell it to somebody else for a hundred dollars, that’s stupid. You’d probably never want to mention how “smart you were” in buying the car originally after you gave it away.

See, this is what you do. I’ve figured you out. You go “WAYYYYY off topic.”
I was talking about how smart Bill Walsh was in “stealing Steve Young from the Buc’s and you, instead of sticking to that point (as in you agree with me or disagree) you go "OFF TOPIC” to say how the Buc’s were the original "Smart One’s.’ See what you do?

I was never talking about TB"s “smartness or dumbness.” I was only talking about Walsh. YOU got off track and started talking about TB.

That’s what people like you have to do. You can’t debate me (cause you lose) so you CONSTANTLY have to veer off course.

BTW: 10 years is a drought, in a town like Denver, for only ONE playoff win. Everything in life is relative. The bar is set a little differently in certain towns. here in Phoenix, they practically had a parade downtown when the Cards won their first division title in decades.

In places like Pittsburgh, Chicago, SF, Dallas, Denver and so on, success isn’t measure by regular season wins. It’s measure ONLY by playoff victories. The SB is the utimate playoff victory.

BTW: Those opinions from fans in Dallas and Denver? Those opinions would also be shared by the owners and MOST coaches and players. I guess I just assumed that you would have figured that out. (LOL)!

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 9:36 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Ok
Yes you did. You said Tampa Bay made the original Smart Move.

Are you saying that drafting Young wasn’t a smart move? You’re just arguing for the sake of arguing now. Stating that drafting Young with the first pick of the supplemental draft in no way is defending Tampa Bay, it is however an acknowledgement that they did make a smart move.

If you buy a Rolls Royce for 10 thousand dollars, that’s smart. If you sell it to somebody else for a hundred dollars, that’s stupid. You’d probably never want to mention how "smart you were" in buying the car originally after you gave it away.

And I criticized them for letting him go. Well giving away a $10,000 Rolls Royce is smarter than giving away $100,000 Rolls Royce. But I digress, your analogy sucks as hard as Vernon Davis milking Mike Martz’ cow.

See, this is what you do. I’ve figured you out. You go "WAYYYYY off topic."
I was talking about how smart Bill Walsh was in "stealing Steve Young from the Buc’s and you, instead of sticking to that point (as in you agree with me or disagree) you go "OFF TOPIC" to say how the Buc’s were the original "Smart One’s.’ See what you do?

Do you read the comments? I did agree with you, you weren’t exactly inventing the wheel there. Or do you just selectively filter what people say until it’s convient for whatever dilluted point you’re trying to make?

I was never talking about TB"s "smartness or dumbness." I was only talking about Walsh. YOU got off track and started talking about TB.

That’s what people like you have to do. You can’t debate me (cause you lose) so you CONSTANTLY have to veer off course.

I may have gone off course a little, which is still far less in quantity and magnitude than you have. I just though the Tampa Bay thing was an interesting tidbit. (I doubt many people know that Young was in the USFL and is still collection a pay check from the Los Angeles Express due to the fact that he signed a 10 year $40M contract where he receives $1M every year for 40 years). Opps there I go again with my digression.

BTW: 10 years is a drought, in a town like Denver, for only ONE playoff win. Everything in life is relative. The bar is set a little differently in certain towns. here in Phoenix, they practically had a parade downtown when the Cards won their first division title in decades.

How is Denver any different than Arizona, Cleveland, Oakland, or Detroit? Just because a team is used to high level of success doesn’t mean a team is impervious to the cyclical nature of the NFL. Just because Owners and fans don’t want to see it happen doesn’t mean it won’t. Somebody has to win and lose and if the NFL wasn’t cyclical and the same teams would keep winning and keep losing. This would cause those losing franchises to fall apart. It’s good for the NFL for Chicago, Pittsburg, SF, Dallas and Denver to do their fare share of sucking. That way Cardinal fans have a reason to be Cardinal fans.

10 years is a F’ing DROUGHT in the NFL
10 years is a drought, in a town like Denver, for only ONE playoff win

Again Denver is no different from any other team. They’re not the Yankees they can’t outspend everybody else so their long term expectations shouldn’t be any different than any other team. With that said winning 1 playoff game in 10 years isn’t really much of a drought. A lot of team go tens year without making the playoffs and a lot of teams sneak in every 4-5 years and are lucky to win a game.

Only 12 out of 32 teams make the playoffs and it’s possible that out of those 12 playoffs teams that only 4 win a game in the playoffs. So 1 playoff win in 10 years seems like a pretty fair expectation.

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 10:11 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Like their move drafting BO. That said, (for the thousandth time) if you are smart enough to draft jhim and then stupid enough to give him away that’s even WORSE than not drafting him at all. As usual, you just don’t get it.

You ALWAYS go off course. It’s your trademark. I make a comment about how smart Walsh was in PREPARING for Montana’s eventual retirement (when comparing Walsh to Shanahan) and you’re talking about how smart TB was to draft him in the first place.

Tampa’s “Intelligence” in drafting Young had NOTHING to do with the conversation.

I know all about the USFL. This (Young) was purely in reference to the fact that while Shanahan NEVER could overcome his loss of a HOF QB, Walsh could and did.

Politicians have a phrase for it. I’m sure you may have heard in during the campaign season. It’s called “Staying on message.” You don’t understand that concept.

How is Denver any different. You’re kidding, right.

The difference is HUGE. You just don’t get this stuff.

Let me help you out here. Go to Green Bay on a Sunday afternoon. It’s a perfect time to stage a robbery as most of the town is at Lambeau Field. Sunday in GB is a “Holy Day.” Not necessarily due to church, but due to the Packers.

Until the Cardinals built their new stadium two years ago, they only had something like 6 – 8 sellouts in the previous ten years or so.

Here’s the difference. A GB loss and the townspeople are borderline suicidal. In Phoenix, a Cards loss elicts a “Same old Cardinals.”

May not be a drought to you sitting in SF, but to the people in Denver and Dallas it feels like a lifetime ago since they won.

Anytime the Arizona Cardinals have as many playoff wins as Denver in the last decade and more than the Cowboys, somethings wrong in those two cities.

The Cardinal’s own (Bill Bidwill) is considered one of the cheapest and worst owners in the NFL. Pat Bowlen and Jerry Jones are considered two of the best.

You just like to argue for the sake of arguing. Period. That’s it.

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 6:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Hopeless
How is Denver any different. You’re kidding, right.

The expectations might be different but the cyclical nature of the NFL applies to same to every team (this is a concept that is obviosly over your head). No team will keep winning forever, not matter what city they play in and not matter what the expectations are.

by methodrampage on Jan 2, 2009 7:24 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Don't forget...

RayRay Rhodes.

"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Dec 31, 2008 8:58 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Jeff Fuller

What exactly was the chain from Seifert on? I’m too lazy to look it up. I had forgotten about Ray. I know that it’s Mooch and Erickson and (now) Rhodes and Nolan.

Who followed who and how would you grade them?

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 9:20 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Ray Rhodes

I just mentioned him when someone mentioned the Jeff Fisher relationship with the 49ers. Seems like Rhodes is never quite given the credit for being one of the top 49ers staff member in the past.

"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Jan 1, 2009 1:43 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

That’s right. I remember he was agood HC in Philly for a couple of years. Sometimes these guys"blur together" to where you almost start thinking they had jobs they never had.

Yeah, with Rhodes and Seifert and Fisher the Niners had some pretty good coaches on the defensive side of the ball for an “offensive” team

by GeoMak on Jan 1, 2009 7:10 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

But...

after George Seifert was Mooch, then Erickson, then Mike and then Mike.

"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Jan 1, 2009 1:45 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Plus it's not easy to win SB's

Winning 2 is a great feat for any coach, winning t2 back-2-back is even more impressive, no matter who’s on his team. Wade Phillips, soft or not, can’t even make the playoffs with an imensly talented team. Don’t discredit Shanahan because he won 2 championships with a 37 and 38 year old Elway. Especially when Elway failed to win one in his previous 14 years of playing QB in the NFL.

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 7:59 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Terrell Davis

How much of that was due to Terrell Davis, as opposed to John Elway? Elway is a great QB but I think the insane rushing attack was the key.

Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!

by Fooch on Dec 30, 2008 5:39 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You’re absolutely correct. Elway not winning before he did was due to the lack of a running game.

Even the best of QB’s need a strong running game.

It’s common knowledge that Davis was the “missing ingredient.” That said, I think it’s easier to find and develop a great running back like Davis than a HOF QB like Elway.

You CAN throw the ball as a first option IF you have a back that worries the defense. You Niners had Craig and Rathman and Martz’s greatest show on turf had the incomparable Marshall Faulk. That’s why this years Cardinals are struggling. They can pass with the best of them but they have no dependable rushing attack to rely on.

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 5:57 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Marino & Shula

One of the greatest QB’s and coaches of all time never won a SB together. Hell, they only made it to 1 Super Bowl in 13 years together. Again, don’t try to discredit Shanahan because he had Elway because they have been better QB/Coach tadems that have failed to do what he and Elway did.

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 8:12 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Marino and Shula.

Shula and Marino had NO running game. Elway and Shanahan (and Reeves) didn’t win a SB until Terrell Davis.

You ability to twist the point is almost fascinating for me to watch. Are you a lawyer or something? (LOL)

The original comment by me (and in the press the next day) was that, when you look at it, Shanahan’s 10 years after Elway produced ONLY one division title and one playoff win. Therefore, a logical question becomes "How much of Shanahan’s success in Denver was due in large part to Elway? It’s not a stretch to say a lot. Mark Schlereth said so (among many others).

And then, methodrampage, as only he can do, “distorts and twists” the point.

After methodman gets done it’s now “other coaches didn’t win a SB with a great QB on the team, so don’t discredit Shanahan, because he did win one with a great QB.”

Sparky, nobody is discrediting Shanahan and the point isn’t whether a coach can win a SB or not with a great QB.

I, & MANY others are pointing out an OBVIOUS FACT: That, since Elway retired Shanahan really hasn’t won much of anything.

Next, I suppose you’ll be saying that, of all the coaches who had a QB with the first name of JOHN, that Shanahan was the best.

You’re too funny for words.

by GeoMak on Jan 2, 2009 9:14 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

He beat 1 winning team

He may have earned it but the jury is far from in.

by methodrampage on Dec 30, 2008 3:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I never said otherwise.

But this was a much different team after Singletary took over.

There’s really no reason NOT to let him have a chance.

by mikev on Dec 30, 2008 5:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

I just don’t want to get ahead of myself and start claiming that Singletary is the next great HC.

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 8:00 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

He’a classic example (along with Holmgren) of a guy who’s an excellent coach who can’t do both jobs (HC & GM). Few can. Parcells could (even though he wasn’t officially the GM in N.Y.). Jimmy Johnson.

He’ll either get a HC job with another team, which he’s certainly qualified for and he’d do a good job, or else someone will make him a HC/GM, which would be a mistake.

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 3:35 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Right. Two Super Bowls with Elway, ONE playoff win in the decade without him. Those are the facts and they speak volumes.

by GeoMak on Dec 30, 2008 9:49 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Parcells went 7 years...

With one playoff win too.

by drummer on Dec 30, 2008 10:03 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Not with the Giants. After that he went to three other failing teams and built them up

You’re comparing apples to oranges. Shanahan was in Denver, with complete contol, for 10 years after Elway.

Comparing that to Parcells who went to N.E., N.Y. and Dallas after the Giants is quite a bit different.

by GeoMak on Jan 2, 2009 9:00 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

They might speak volumes

But they speak it at a pretty low decibel. There’s really less to that statement than you think.

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 8:17 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Mike

Shanahan was fired today, according to MSN sports (foxsports.com)

"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Dec 30, 2008 3:20 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Um...

Read the comments much?

Check out The Examined Life. Or don't. Whatever.
"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f**kin' amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK

by Josh from Hollywood on Dec 30, 2008 3:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Correct

We threw up a link above and a discussion is slowly developing.

Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!

by Fooch on Dec 30, 2008 3:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Shanahan firing link:

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/9008898/Shanahan-out-as-Broncos-coach-after-late-collapse

"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Dec 30, 2008 3:25 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

So, I hear Mike Shanahan was fired by Denver.

Any thoughts?

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Dec 30, 2008 3:27 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Two words:

Explosive Offense!

"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Dec 30, 2008 3:28 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Offensive Coordinator: 94' Replay

Does anyone thinkg Shananhan would consider returning as OC if no Coaching position would be offered?

Joe and Steve were under the same system for years... don't expect Smith to be super so soon.

by bayboy on Dec 30, 2008 3:50 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think he'll

take the Lions job before becoming an OC again.

"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Dec 30, 2008 3:56 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

who cares

I just dont want this to be a boring offense like the Bears of the 80’s.

STEVE HOLM! refuses to be the odd man out.

by UnleashTheGore on Dec 30, 2008 4:51 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

agreed

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Dec 30, 2008 4:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

As I said in the other thread, people need to settle down here

I have no problem with vehement disagreements. But there’s no point in calling people stupid or idiots or anything like that. This goes for everybody.

Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!

by Fooch on Dec 30, 2008 5:49 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

some people beat me to it but I think Shannahan could be a great fit for the niners

If he doesn’t get another head coaching job first, which I think he will he would work well with our playing corps. However, I think it could be problematic in that he would probably move on again after one season to another head coaching job somewhere else which wouldn’t work. We’d have to secure some sort of multi-year commitment which wouldn’t happen. So – in rambling conclusion, sounded great at first but not realistic.

by foosball4949 on Dec 30, 2008 6:01 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I really think Shanahan will take another HC job

He’s got too long a history of success to take a step down. If he doesn’t get an offer he likes this off-season I would think he would take a year off and see what becomes available next season.

by DiegoAsFan on Dec 30, 2008 6:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Barrows' comments on the kinds of offense

Maybe someone else repeated them in the thread, but the teams with the top five running attacks are in the playoffs. Only two of the top five passing attacks made it to the playoffs.

If I recall, the Niners’ run offense was something like 29th. That sounds way low to me, so I’d like to see someone else either confirm or repudiate those numbers. I guess that you can have a 1000-yard rusher if no one else gains much and still end up low in the league in rushing.

One of the reasons the defense played better in the second half is because the “high risk/high reward” Martz offense was toned down.

And I’ll say it now, more forcefully. Going into next year the Niners are going to need to upgrade their running game. Either move Clayton up to spell Gore or get someone else if Clayton isn’t the guy. Who here wouldn’t like to see Jahvid Best miraculously transported onto the roster?

by Bob On The Coast on Dec 30, 2008 6:04 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Jahvid Best

Should’ve asked Santa for Goodell to change the underclassmen rule. I’m very curious to see how Best does at the next level.

Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!

by Fooch on Dec 30, 2008 6:25 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

A little of topic

But has there been indication on what Singletary plans to do with the defense? Are the 49ers going to stick with the 3-4 or switch to a 4-3?

by DiegoAsFan on Dec 30, 2008 7:01 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

3-4

As far as i know they are going to stick with the 3-4. Once Manusky had more control over the defence after Nolans firing, they did improved very much in the scheme.

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Dec 30, 2008 7:16 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"We'll see them again in the playoffs." -- Coach Mike Singletary after a gut-wrenching week 3 loss to the Vikings.
Start posting about the 49ers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
49ers Future.
Gary05-6_small21_small
Niners Forgotten Man Deserves Pro Bowl Recognition
Montana_action_150-188_1__small
Top NCAA/NFL Prospects
Dave_small
Week 9 Prediction Games
Mc_small
Ask Music City Miracles

Recent FanPosts

Images_small
Team Sport?
49ers_small
Thursday Night: Season on the Line
Saracyndi_small
Indianapolis: A Great Place to Fall Down
49er_small
This Was a Good Game.
Small
time to get rid of another coach
Small
What to do about the 49ers Ownership? Ship them OUT!!!!
P1jackson_small
Alex Smith Sucks.
Small
WHY DID WE LET KORY SHEETS GO
Images_small
Titans vs. 49ers: The World According to Madden

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Cincy Jungle
Open Thread: Pittsburgh Steelers at Denver Broncos
Arrowhead Pride
Schefter: Larry Johnson Wants to Play for the Steelers
Arrowhead Pride
Bears Make Three Teams Not Ruling Out Larry Johnson

SPONSORS


Head Ball Coach

Dave_small Fooch

Editors

Jerry_rice_small ProfessorBigelow

Assistant Coaches