Niners Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Fedor vs Rogers Results and Live Coverage

Wide Receivers: Long look back, brief look forward

This is the first of many looks back at the season that was.  I initially was going to give grades, but it's so subjective that I might as well just give my own qualitative opinion.  Additionally, I want to use these to get the thoughts rolling on what the 49ers might do in free agency and the draft for a specific position.  Nothing too specific, but just get the thoughts flowing.  Onto the wide receiver position.

This season was certainly an interesting one at the wide receiver position.  When Mike Martz came to town, many of us had visions of Mike Furrey and the like dancing in our heads.  The Mike Martz offense created some phenomenal wide receivers, but something different happened in San Francisco.  When Mike Singletary (and Shaun Hill) took over, the offense became more conservative.  And yet, as it became more conservative, we saw some our veteran wide receivers find a groove and the younger receivers make big strides.

Isaac Bruce: After ten games of the season, Isaac Bruce was looking decent but not much else.  He'd a couple good games, but not much else.  However, for the final six weeks, Isaac Bruce became Shaun Hill's go-to guy.  He picked up more key first downs than I can remember, all while cracking the 1,000 reception mark and surpassing Tim Brown on the receiving yards career list.  Not too shabby for a 36-year old who St. Louis thought was finished. 

Bruce has one more year on his contract and I find myself quite excited to see what he can do on his own and with the younger receivers in 2009.  He's not a burner who will break long plays, but given the likely conservative nature of the next offensive coordinator, it's perfect.  As the younger guys continue to develop I think Bruce will become the focal point less and less.  However, the good thing is he'll always be there as a safety valve.

Bryant Johnson: Johnson's final numbers come across as disappointing.  He was almost nonexistent for large stretches of the Nolan season and had to battle back from a bad training camp injury that stunted his development in the offensive scheme.  However, I did notice that as the season wore on, he made numerous important catches at key points in the game.  I think he still thinks he can be a #1 type of receiver, but at best he was a complimentary cog this season.  Heck, had Josh Morgan not gotten his staph infection, I'd imagine Morgan would have fit in quite nicely as the #2 receiver.

The question then is whether or not to bring him back.  I'm convinced that if he can get through training camp healthy, he could be a very solid weapon for the 49ers.  Of course, I also think that Jason Hill, Josh Morgan and even Dominique Zeigler have enough potential that I'd rather let Johnson walk than stunt their growth.  I think it comes down to how much growth does the team think they'll get from Hill, Morgan and Zeigler.  Hill, in particular, is entering his third season, which is a time when many young receivers make a big leap in production.

Jason Hill: Hill was just about nonexistent his rookie season due to injury issues and being a rookie on an awful team.  His second year was shaping up to be even worse as he had no catches during the Nolan part of the season.  Singletary took the helm for Week 8 and immediately Jason Hill became productive.  Coincidence?  Well I suppose Arnaz Battle getting injured made a big impact as well.  However, Singletary did give him the opportunity.  Jason Hill is a prime example of the problem with Mike Nolan.  Aside from the higher picks, he was never willing to let young guys show their stuff.  Mike Singletary has shown that with Hill and Rachal, among others, and it's helped the team grow.

As previously mentioned, the third year of a wide receiver's career is often a crucial year in his development.  The question with Hill is if he can make that step.  Hill's development is tied in part to what the team does with Bryant Johnson and Arnaz Battle.  Johnson is a free agent and Battle is a year away from free agency.  I'm a big Battle fan, but the young guys seem to have more talent than him.  One option is keeping Battle and then when Bruce is done after next season, Battle keeps his roster spot as the younger receivers move up in the ranks.  In the end I'm not quite sure what to do with Arnaz Battle.

Josh Morgan: Thanks to injuries to most of the receiving corp, Josh Morgan got all the reps with the first team offense.  This allowed him to develop solid chemistry J.T. O'Sullivan, which in turn led to a very impressive couple of weeks in the preseason.  I know that most of us here at Niners Nation were piloting the bandwagon quite admirably.  Of course, a staph infection veered the bandwagon right into the San Francisco Bay.  Morgan lost a lot of weight and his development was brought to a screeching halt.  He did make his way back, but was derailed again by a groin injury.

While we did not get the immediate stud receiver we'd anticipated, he did provide some big time highlights that have 49ers fans hungry for more.  If he and Jason Hill can both stay healthy, I think we're in for quite the competition between those two in training camp.

Dominique Zeigler: Aside from the awesome afro, Dominique Zeigler was not too shabby in his brief time with the 49ers.  He spent a year and a half on the practice squad before injuries to Arnaz Battle and Josh Morgan opened up a spot on the roster.  He finished the season with 5 catches for 97 yards and 5 special teams tackles.  Maybe I'm getting ahead of myself, but four of Zeigler's catches gained some big yards as I recall (he had one catch for one yard so that doesn't get factored in).

Maybe he'll never be a big time stud, but we could have a nice little slot receiver on our hands.  Not a game-breaker, but somebody who can make important contributions throughout the season.  Some tough choices need to be made in the offseason, and his performance this season warrants notice.  Also, since he spent more than six games on the active roster, he can no longer be placed on the practice squad.

Arnaz Battle: The "rock" of the 49ers receiving corp the last few years (that's not saying much) was crushed by injuries the final two months of the season.  If Bryant Johnson were to return, it's entirely possible Battle has fallen to fifth on the depth chart at best.  I honestly don't know what will happen with Battle going forward.  When healthy he's a very solid, if unspectacular, receiver. 

I think the problem I have is being too emotionally attached.  Battle has been there through the dark years and if the team were to finally turn things around, it would suck for him to miss out.  This is a guy who was primarily a quarterback in college and has turned himself into a pretty decent wide receiver, all things considered.  At the same time, I think he's maxed out his abilities, so maybe it's time to consider other options.

Looking Forward
If you're interested, you can head over to Football's Future to check out the various 2009 free agents, wide receiver in this case.  The big name, of course, is TJ Houshmanzadeh.  He is not expected to get the Bengals franchise tag, so it will just take a big time contract offer.  The 49ers are likely to have the cap room, but I'm not sure it's the wisest idea (if it were to actually happen of course).  The 49ers aren't great at wide receiver, but the development is coming along rather nicely, with what they've got. 

Aside from Housh, there really isn't much of anything out there in free agency, which leaves us with the draft.  It's still early and I have a lot of research to do, but I definitely don't expect the 49ers to spend a first, or probably even second round pick on a wide receiver (although Barrows thinks they go with Percy Harvin from Florida with the first pick). 

After the jump I've got a list of ESPN's Top 20 WR prospects.  Feel free to discuss 49ers wide receivers, free agent wide receivers and wide receiver draft prospects until you're blue in the face.

Star-divide

Here's the top 20 receivers according to ESPN.  After each name is the overall ranking among all potential draft picks.  Some of these names are speculation on underclassmen (e.g. Michael Crabtree).  Also, it's not entirely up to date as a guy like Hakeem Nicks of North Carolina isn't even in the non-top 20 part of the list and his stock has to be rising after the Meineke Car Care Bowl.

1. Michael Crabtree, Texas Tech (4)
2. Jeremy Maclin, Missouri (8)
3. Percy Harvin, Florida (32)
4. Darrius Heyward-Bey, Maryland (38)
5. Kenny Britt, Rutgers (52)
6. Brandon LaFell, LSU (60)
7. Juaquin Iglesias, Oklahoma (69)
8. Derrick Williams, Penn State (78)
9. Louis Murphy, Florida (83)
10. Mohamed Massaquoi, Georgia (88)
11. Brian Robiskie, Ohio State (94)
12. Brandon Tate, North Carolina (96)
13. Brandon Gibson, Washington State (100)
14. Pat White, West Virginia (yes, the QB) (104)
15. Demetrius Byrd, LSU (113)
16. Quan Cosby, Texas (117)
17. Brooks Foster, North Carolina (132)
18. Ramses Barden, Cal Poly (139)
19. Kenny McKinley, South Carolina (144)
20. Jarrett Dillard, Rice (150)

Poll
If he wants back, should the 49ers resign Bryant Johnson?
Yes
119 votes
No
91 votes

210 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 40 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

—Morgan said he will take about three weeks of rest to allow his torn groin muscle to heal. When asked if believes he’s capable of being the No. 1 receiver next season, Morgan said, “They told me if I hadn’t gotten injured, I would’ve been the No. 1 receiver this year.”

 And who told him that?

“Everybody,” he said

I feel pretty good about our WR’s next year. I wouldn’t mind him returning but I don’t think it’s at the top of the list of priorities.

Simply by pulling on both ends, Patrick Willis can stretch diamonds back into coal

by 49erLou on Dec 31, 2008 8:40 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

+1

I’d much rather see the money put towards Haynesworth than Housh. And with a run-heavy offense coming next year a big guard/tackle and a 2nd back are also bigger priorities than WR.

by sam23 on Dec 31, 2008 2:54 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

With Bruce returning I don’t see the need for Bryant Johnson. If Bruce was leaving I’d be in favor for bringing Bryant Johnson back just for depth purposes.

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 8:47 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

And again we have a WR problem...

But finally its a pretty good problem. We have a recieving core that we seem pretty happy with and can’t figure out who to leave as the odd man out.

I love the young guys. Hill, Morgan, and Zeigler look to be a solid 1,2,3 core for years to come… though in this order: Morgan, Hill, Zeigler.

Bruce, Battle and Johnson are a solid group of veteran recievers and if I were to get rid of somebody it would be one of these. Obviously, Bruce has been solid and probably tremendous in developing the young talent and with one more year on his contract obviously isn’t going anywhere.

So that leaves Battle and Johnson and like you I am torn. I love Battle as he has toughed it out here for years and is a solid contributor. But I feel like out of the two, Johnson is the better WR. It’s hard to evaluate the two as they were both hampered by injury at different times of the year. I voted for resigning Johnson, and as such, this would mean, with a heavy heart, letting Battle go.

Unless the team decides to keep 6 WRs, but with Sing wanting a more smashmouth football offensive style, I see no need for 6 WRs.

by Sebaz49 on Dec 31, 2008 8:52 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Battle vs. Johnson

Battle is already signed, Johnson is not. That should swing any kind of tie breaker Battle’s way.

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 9:04 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I was going to say this.

Pretty much. Bruce was our leading receiver this year, no? So you kind of believe he’s not the odd man out. I agree that Hill and Morgan are locks here, and you can maybe say the same about Zeigler, though he might not be the lock that some are making him out to be.

Even so, assuming that Zeigler is a non-issue and that there is an odd man out, that odd man out is most likely either Battle or Johnson. Battle is under contract… problem solved.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Dec 31, 2008 9:19 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Good point

So I guess then I would say it all depends on what they can sign Johnson for. If they can talk him down in price some, keep him and let Battle go. Otherwise stick with Battle for the year and reevalutate the position next year, with hopefully some development by the young guys, as to to what to do about Battle.

by Sebaz49 on Jan 5, 2009 1:47 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

If I were...

in control of the team, I would keep Johnson and Battle to go along with Hill, Morgan and Bruce. That’s 5 WR’s with experience. No need to draft in that position, unless another Jerry Rice magically appears either in the draft or in free agency. That leaves the team with 7 picks to focus on the DL and safety positions. After getting the need positions, the team could pick in the “best athlete available” category.

"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Dec 31, 2008 9:08 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

What of Zeigler in this scenario? Others seem to be penciling him in almost as a lock for a roster spot.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Dec 31, 2008 9:19 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Personally I keep Zeigler as the #5 WR

I think Johnson gets too much money for the Niners to sign as a #4/#5 WR.

by methodrampage on Dec 31, 2008 9:30 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I tend to agree.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Dec 31, 2008 9:41 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

wait...

…do we actually agree on something???? (see below)

by Florida Danny on Dec 31, 2008 11:09 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

he’s probably not better than Hill, Morgan or Battle so why eat up a significant amount of cash to bring him back for limited playing time. Not that I dont like Johnson, just that there are plenty of other needs where the money could be better spent (ie DT, OT, G, RB, young backup QB, OLB)

by sam23 on Dec 31, 2008 2:56 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

You know what?

I did forget Nique! Keep Ziegler and lose Johnson if the price is not right.

"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Jan 1, 2009 12:40 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Keep Ziegler, Lose Johnson

I’d keep Ziegler because he’s got great hands, an awesome afro, no attitude issues, and he’s cheap, to boot. Johnson is solid, but I’d like Morgan and Hill to take his reps. Also, how is Johnson’s blocking? My non-expert opinion would put it behind Battle’s, plus Battle is under contract. Johnson has taken is 1st-round pick status as a license to think he’s capable of being a #1 receiver, and worthy of #1 receiver money, and he’s proven neither of these.

Throwback unis? Yes. Throwback afros? YES!

by grantmp on Dec 31, 2008 11:00 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

question and comment
If he and Jason Hill can both stay healthy, I think we’re in for quite the competition between those two in training camp.

am i wrong, or don’t they play different positions? i’m pretty sure morgan backed up johnson, while hill backed up bruce. of course, hill saw plenty of action as the slot guy too.

in re who to keep, i think it’s a no-brainer:

1) hill
2) morgan
3) zeigler
4) bruce
5) battle

i’m of the philosophy that you never pay big to keep a veteran when you have a youngster that is cheaper and an equal or soon-to-be-equal performance-wise. you’re telling me morgan or zeigler can’t put up the same numbers as johnson? please. personally, i think the same thing about hill/bruce. given the opportunity, hill could easily post the 70-800-7 season bruce just did. bruce they should keep for mentoring. battle they should keep for special teams. johnson they should get rid of. otherwise, let the young guys play.

by Florida Danny on Dec 31, 2008 11:04 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

positions

I mentioned them in competition because Hill sort of bounced around. He played in the slot (Battle’s role before he was injured) and backed up all around. Also, I just got the 49ers end of year depth chart and they list one wide receiver position’s order as Bryant Johnson —> Josh Morgan —> Jason Hill. I’m honestly not sure what that means going forward as far as who’s the flanker, who’s the split end and who’s the slot.

Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!

by Fooch on Dec 31, 2008 11:08 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

CUT Battle and sign Johnson for cheap

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Dec 31, 2008 2:01 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

doubtful

that he’d come for any cheaper than Battle is already signed for

by sam23 on Dec 31, 2008 2:58 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Cut Battle anyways haha

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Dec 31, 2008 3:05 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

why?

Battle isnt spectacular, but he’s solid. He does everythings asked of him, blocks well, seems to be a good locker room guy, is capable of contributing on special teams,usually has steady hands and a reasonable contract. Isnt that plenty from a 4th/5th receiver?

by sam23 on Dec 31, 2008 3:22 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

And he has an awesome website.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Dec 31, 2008 3:50 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

Battle isn’t a #1 WR, but if you compare him to other #4/5 WR he looks really good, especially when he’s going up against unproven DB’s that are in the game for NIckel and Dime packages. i would definitely keep Battle.

by sundaysfinest on Dec 31, 2008 4:02 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Battle Stinks

The END

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Dec 31, 2008 5:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Battle isn't some phenom but...

I wouldn’t say he “stinks.” I’d take him over a lot of receivers out there when healthy.

Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!

by Fooch on Dec 31, 2008 5:19 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Your true hate for Arnaz Battle continues to astound me. I don’t understand why, but your opinion is your opinion.

My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.

by howtheyscored on Dec 31, 2008 7:37 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Arnaz

has a good attitude, too. Who wouldn’t want him? I think he has played hurt before; a good team performer you hardly see anymore.

"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Jan 1, 2009 12:43 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Battle

My problem with Battle is more due to the 9ers for making him a primary reciever. I feel he is barely a number 3 reciever and would probably be a number 4 guy on most teams. You are not going to go to Battle for your go ahead TD, any big gain, speed(He is slower than grass grows), or for a spectacular catch therefore his value does not exceed that of a number 3 guy. That is why he isnt high on my list.

Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.

by maveric_87 on Jan 2, 2009 6:45 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Davis

can’t forget about Davis, I really believe that Singletary is going to work the crap out of Davis to make him the elite TE that he is supposed to be.

by sundaysfinest on Dec 31, 2008 4:05 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

as a blocker maybe. I now doubt that he’ll ever be an elite receiving TE.

by sam23 on Dec 31, 2008 4:11 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Hopefully...

Davis realizes his potential athletically/physically and a mind set that he can dominate if given the chance. There are plenty of TE’s who have less physical tools/ gifts than he does and have suceeded.

"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Jan 1, 2009 12:46 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Bryant Johnson

Johnson was drafted in the first year by the Cardinals the year they drafted Anquan Boldin.

Boldin is one of the best receivers in the game. Johnson (based on past performace) will always underachieve. He’s capable of playing well at times but then disappears.

Boldin wants out of AZ. It would be great to work out a trade. He’s a freaking beast.
Trent Dilfer says he’s his favorite player in the league. He’s the most respected player on the Cards. he’s the kind of player that makes everybody around him better.

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 7:41 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

draft picks

I don’t like giving up picks for players. Boldin is certainly great but I think the number of picks it would take (along with the big contract extension) could be better used beefing up the offensive and defensive line. Josh Morgan and Jason Hill probably won’t develop into Anquan Boldin, but they could be very solid receivers in their own right.

Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!

by Fooch on Dec 31, 2008 7:53 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Boldin

It’s just wishful thinking. The Cards problay wouldn’t trade him in the division anyway. The funny thing is that he’s “MIke Singletary.” In terms of attitude, ability, respect, “quiet leadership” and so on he’s Singletary as a wide receiver. Both were even drafted at the top of the second round.

The Cards drafted Larry Fitzgerald when Denny Green was here in part because Green knew him and his family fron his days with the Vikings. “Q” is pissed because the Cards promised to rework his contract but couldn’t/wouldn’t cause they reworked Fitzgeralds. They now have a problem because Boldin is rightfully unhappy and yet if they pay him what he wants/deserves it will take up too much cap space being allotted to wide receivers.

Beyond the numbers, he’s just a special, special player. From Warner on down, his teammates all revere him. It’s just too bad that more players aren’t like that.

by GeoMak on Dec 31, 2008 8:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

yea I’d much rather dedicate 10 million to Haynesworth than Boldin, especially with the run heavy/ball posession strategy Singletary looks like he wants to employ.

by sam23 on Jan 1, 2009 5:08 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Gailikk

Wow, the general agreement is that B. Johnson needs to go here. I like that, he isn’t worth keeping and there are other needs than WR (haven’t said that in a while as a 49er fan). I am curios to the TE position, do the coaches draft a few later to let Davis go, or do we like him as a receiving TE.

by Gailikk on Jan 2, 2009 6:35 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

First, thanks Gailikk for summing it up for me because I really didn’t want to go through all of these comments (my eyes really hurt right now). I too, like the majority, feel B. Johnson should be the one out. He was a HUGE disappointment. The word on this guy was he played in Arizona with two star wide outs in Anquan Bolden and Larry Fitzgerald, and all he needed was a chance. Well, he had his chance with the 49ers and didn’t capitalize on his opportunities. I think that says it all. Players like that who don’t capitalize on their first opportunity probably aren’t going to do it in the near future (see Kevan Barlow). You can go on about how he got injured and thus wasn’t able to perform at the highest level, but given the receivers we currently have on the team now, it would be a big mistake to keep him around, for a few reasons: 1) He would get in the way of the development of Jason Hill, Josh Morgan, and Dominique Zeigler (reminds me of Randy Moss, no? Tall, skinny, and shifty with break-away speed), and 2) Some have said Bryant is a better wide out than Arnaz. You can say that if both were competing for the #1 spot and we were desperate, but that’s not the case. I’d take Arnaz any day because we know what he brings to the table, and that’s a pair of solid hands on third down possessions, and some great down-field blocking, reminiscent of a Hines Ward, that can help Frank Gore (remember him) break loose for big runs.

Coach Sing is running this team, guys, and it has been mentioned time and time again—his offense is likely going to be conservative with short pass attacks, and a heavy dose of the ground attack. With that said, I would rather have Arnaz blocking for me. The year Frank had his best season was in 2006, and guess who was starting? Arnaz was the starting wide out along with Antonio Bryant (what a great season he had with the Bucs).

More on B. Johnson’s abilities (before anyone jumps on me): Bryant showed “flashes” of being a big play threat in Arizona only because Bolden and Fitzgerald demanded double teams and the best defensive players to be on them every time they took the field. What does that mean? It meant that when Bryant ran his routes, he was likely only covered by one defender, and likely a weak one at that. Anyone would be able to take advantage of that situation, and as a result show “flashes” and “potential”. Apparently, Coach Nolan and company failed to recognize that when they decided to bring him on board. This guy isn’t shifty, and DOES NOT have break away speed, despite what others have said. You wanna know who has break away speed? Dominique Zeigler. Please rewind to week 14 against the Jets when Z took a quick slant play for a nice 31 yard gainer. Here’s a link to that play: http://www.nfl.com/players/profile?id=00-0024687
That play reminds me a lot of Randy Moss in his younger days. If number 23 didn’t tackle him, Z would have taken it to the house.

With all of that being said, I think the 49ers are pretty much set at the wide out positions. Bring Bruce back for another year because he still has it, and the trio (Hill, Morgan, and Z) can learn from the master on how to run routes. Arnaz will be 29 in February, and I say keep him over Bryant (only one year younger than Arnaz). Going into the offseason, the biggest concern should be on the line, both defensive and offensive. After all, one of the aspects of Coach Sing’s formula for success was First, thanks Gailikk for summing it up for me because I really didn’t want to go through all of these comments (my eyes really hurt right now). I too, like the majority, feel B. Johnson should be the one out. He was a HUGE disappointment. The word on this guy was he played in Arizona with two star wide outs in Anquan Bolden and Larry Fitzgerald, and all he needed was a chance. Well, he had his chance with the 49ers and didn’t capitalize on his opportunities. I think that says it all. Players like that who don’t capitalize on their first opportunity probably aren’t going to do it in the near future (see Kevan Barlow). You can go on about how he got injured and thus wasn’t able to perform at the highest level, but given the receivers we currently have on the team now, it would be a big mistake to keep him around, for a few reasons: 1) He would get in the way of the development of Jason Hill, Josh Morgan, and Dominique Zeigler (reminds me of Randy Moss, no? Tall, skinny, and shifty with break-away speed), and 2) Some have said Bryant is a better wide out than Arnaz. You can say that if both were competing for the #1 spot and we were desperate, but that’s not the case. I’d take Arnaz any day because we know what he brings to the table, and that’s a pair of solid hands on third down possessions, and some great down-field blocking, reminiscent of a Hines Ward, that can help Frank Gore (remember him) break loose for big runs.

Coach Sing is running this team, guys, and it has been mentioned time and time again—his offense is likely going to be conservative with short pass attacks, and a heavy dose of the ground attack. With that said, I would rather have Arnaz blocking for me. The year Frank had his best season was in 2006, and guess who was starting? Arnaz was the starting wide out along with Antonio Bryant (what a great season he had with the Bucs).

More on B. Johnson’s abilities (before anyone jumps on me): Bryant showed “flashes” of being a big play threat in Arizona only because Bolden and Fitzgerald demanded double teams and the best defensive players to be on them every time they took the field. What does that mean? It meant that when Bryant ran his routes, he was likely only covered by one defender, and likely a weak one at that. Anyone would be able to take advantage of that situation, and as a result show “flashes” and “potential”. Apparently, Coach Nolan and company failed to recognize that when they decided to bring him on board. This guy isn’t shifty, and DOES NOT have break away speed, despite what others have said. You wanna know who has break away speed? Dominique Zeigler. Please rewind to week 14 against the Jets when Z took a quick slant play for a nice 31 yard gainer. Here’s a link to that play: http://www.nfl.com/players/profile?id=00-0024687
That play reminds me a lot of Randy Moss in his younger days. If number 23 didn’t tackle him, Z would have taken it to the house.

With all of that being said, I think the 49ers are pretty much set at the wide out positions. Bring Bruce back for another year because he still has it, and the trio (Hill, Morgan, and Z) can learn from the master on how to run routes. Arnaz will be 29 in February, and I say keep him over Bryant, who is only one year younger than Arnaz. Going into the offseason, the biggest concern should be on the line, both defensive and offensive. After all, one of the aspects of Coach Sing’s formula for success was “dominating the trenches”.

Oh yeah, I think we’re set at the tight end position. VD should be given a chance to develop a connection with Shaun Hill during the offseason, and if that doesn’t work out, we can always use him as a blocking tight end with Delanie as the receiver. Yes, that would suck if VD doesn’t work out, but he’s still a great blocker (see what he did to Joey Porter).

by Waiting4JoshMorgan on Jan 2, 2009 1:56 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

I apologize for the repetitive paragraphs. I don’t know what happened there.

I think I might have copied and pasted this thing when trying to save my 1st draft. Stupid internet keeps cutting out and I keep losing my posts…

by Waiting4JoshMorgan on Jan 2, 2009 2:06 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Johnson

As I stated above he’s a classic “underachiever.” He was drafted in the same year as Boldin. Bryant was drafted in the 1st round and Boldin in the 2nd. Both were drafted a year or two before Fitzgerald. While Boldin and Fitzgerald are two of the NFL’s premier receivers (though both have different skill sets) Bryant is really just a “tease.”

He plays well enough to earn a paycheck and to make people think that he can be a Number 1 or Number 2 but all he really does, in the end, is disappoint.

by GeoMak on Jan 2, 2009 4:21 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Bryant Johnson

No worries on the repetition.

As for Johnson, one problem for him was that he got hurt early in training camp and it took him a while to get back in sync. Great wide receivers usually figure things out, but at the same time, IF Johnson was brought back and was healthy the entire preseason, I think he’d have a better year. I have no problem letting him go, but still worth keeping this in mind.

Niners Nation - The premier 49ers blog on the Internet!

by Fooch on Jan 2, 2009 2:52 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"We'll see them again in the playoffs." -- Coach Mike Singletary after a gut-wrenching week 3 loss to the Vikings.
Start posting about the 49ers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Gary05-6_small21_small
Niners Forgotten Man Deserves Pro Bowl Recognition
Montana_action_150-188_1__small
Top NCAA/NFL Prospects
Dave_small
Week 9 Prediction Games
Mc_small
Ask Music City Miracles
Small
The Jimmy Raye play-by-play. Does he really suck?

Recent FanPosts

Images_small
Titans vs. 49ers: The World According to Madden
Small
summary of NFL Experts picking 49ers to win or lose this season
Small
Playoffs: Details on the 2 horse race...
Montana_action_150-188_1__small
Weapons & Matchups (49ers vs. Titans)
Small
Remaining Strength of Schedule
Pictures_110_small
Colts players are dropping like flies!!!!!
Memento-lies_small
The 49ers are coming up short on 3rd down
Frank-gore_small
Strength of Schedule

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Blogging The Boys
Pickin' & Grinnin' Week Nine
Mile High Report
Scouting Terrence Cody
Battle Red Blog
Ryan Moats Will Start Against The Colts

SPONSORS


Head Ball Coach

Dave_small Fooch

Editors

Jerry_rice_small ProfessorBigelow

Assistant Coaches

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

Pixies_logo_small Florida Danny

M_12a62905a0324d2da2f43ddaf62c630f_small Ninjames

Duct_tape_bandit_small Josh from Hollywood

Crab_tree_small briandean

Moderators

Jackalope_card_small wjackalope