WR Choices

by wader251 on Feb 12, 2008 1:30 PM PST

I am sort of new to writing diaries so if this is repetitive of other topics I apologize. There is a lot of discussion about whether our Niners need to add a Wide Receiver or if we are all set. So I thought it would be interesting to get everyone's thoughts on the Niners options. To create a framework I thought I would propose a survey that has some options for receivers that have been discussed on this site and others. For the trade options lets just assume the the receiver can be had for a second round and another late round draft pick.

Poll

What is the Niners' best option for the WR

Trade for some other WR

0 votes

No Thanks, we're all set

1 votes

Draft a WR 1st Round

7 votes

Draft a WR 2nd Round

17 votes

Draft a WR 3rd Round

2 votes

Draft a WR 4th Round or later

2 votes

Sign Bernard Berrian

13 votes

Sign DJ Hackett

3 votes

Trade for Chad Johnson

20 votes

Trade for Roy Williams

16 votes

81 votes | Poll has closed

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Niners Nation's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Niners Nation's writers or editors.

Tweet Comment 9 comments | 0 recs |

Do you like this story?

Comments

My vote

Put me down as: No thanks, we're all set. I really think our receiving core is above average. I understand how terrible last year was but I don't think it reflects our true skill level. Now, if we could trade for Chad or Roy for a 3rd round pick or later, I would be interested. Otherwise, no thanks.

We are not who I thought we were.

by marcello on Feb 12, 2008 8:29 PM PST reply actions

Surprize

This poll was born out of a debate between Braekneck and me. Obviously nothing is dispositive off of a poll on a blog but where were all the people who voted for adding a WR when we were having our discussion. I think Braekneck has been intimidating people around here. But no more. You can all feel free to tell him how wrong he is on this WR issue.

Tom will never be as cool as Joe

by wader251 on Feb 14, 2008 1:47 PM PST reply actions

It's just easier

To click a poll option that it is to articulate a stance on something. It's funny that everyone wants us to trade for Chad Johnson, too bad that rumor has zero merit to it and he's not going anywhere as Cincy would take a $8+ million cap hit if they dealt him. Therefore, you're just wishing at this point.

Here's to hoping Albert Hanyesworth stomps on Alex Smith's head.

by methodrampage on Feb 14, 2008 2:11 PM PST up reply actions

85 isn't Ocho Cinco

I voted for trading for Johnson, but not because I think we can. If we could give up a fourth rounder for him, I'd do it in a heartbeat. But like I said before, it's not a priority to get a #1 receiver, it would just be fun to see.

It would be like trading for Peyton Manning for a fifth round draft choice. Pure fun to think about, but it would never ever happen.

Thinking of giving up sports and taking up heavy drinking.

by Drunken Miller on Feb 16, 2008 10:15 AM PST up reply actions

Trades for Players

I am not really sure how to respond to your comeent considering the diary entery said to assume the players can be traded for a second and later round pick. Obvioulsy everyone would trade a fourth rounder for Chad Johnson.

Tom will never be as cool as Joe

by wader251 on Feb 16, 2008 11:42 AM PST up reply actions

Who has the time???

I'm a somewhat busy guy, so it's not like I have the time to read all of what you posted... Words, words words... It's all just too much.

Re: 4th round pick, I'm making a reference to the Randy Moss trade there, realizing that it's a completely useless comparison. I'm just saying I'd love to see Chad in a Niners uni, even if I don't think we should give very much up to get him.

Thinking of giving up sports and taking up heavy drinking.

by Drunken Miller on Feb 19, 2008 2:33 PM PST up reply actions

I don't care how we do it

but we need a #1 receiver. the draft is risky but there are some attractive options, so that's probably where they'll look. sadly, the niners brain trust has been completely incapable of drafting WRs since we got TO. This is what the list looks like*:

Bust
Bust
Bust
Bust
Never had a chance
Bust
Bust
Didn't let him play

this list not based on fact, only perception*

**perception limited to that of wjackalope

Bring back the classic Uni's!

by wjackalope on Feb 14, 2008 3:21 PM PST reply actions

wait, why is that bold

and how did that asterisk get on the end of that sentence? and I thought those were colons. either auto format is really messing with me or I am badly in need of more sleep. probably both.

Bring back the classic Uni's!

by wjackalope on Feb 14, 2008 3:22 PM PST up reply actions