49ers Fullback Situation
I was trying to come up with a clever title and just decided, screw it, and went with the generic title. While poking around the Internet this morning, I came across another 49ers blog called 49ers Locker. They're providing "projected grades" for the 2008 season position by position, and over the weekend they addressed fullback. They projected a C for the season in large part due to the position's lack of use in the Mike Martz offense.
So the question becomes what will happen with the fullback position and how many guys will be kept? In the initial 53-man projection we did, Moran Norris was the only fullback we kept. However, the OTAs have me wondering what will end up happening at that position. I looked back over Matt Maiocco's OTA reports and he had some interesting comments. During the practices open to the media, Zak Keasey received most of the first-team snaps. At the same time, when discussing the role of the fullback in Martz's offense, it's clear that some of the FB responsibilities are filled by the tight ends and H-backs. After OTAs were completed, MM went through the roster and when addressing fullback said:
Fullback: Moran Norris has been the starter. But how much will Martz utilize the fullback? Probably not much. Might the 49ers go with Zak Keasey ahead of Norris? We already know the 49ers plan to use Frank Gore and Michael Robinson together in the backfield some of the time. Other times, they can use tight ends Vernon Davis, Delanie Walker and Billy Bajema out of the backfield. Does that make Norris expendable?
Looking at the 49ers roster as it currently stands, there are plenty of guys to fill the necessary roles. Vernon Davis lined up in the backfield quite a bit last season and the coaches have stated they'll use Michael Robinson in the same backfield as Frank Gore at times. While any of those options reduces the power running idea a little bit, it gives the offense more flexibility. If you've got a non-fullback in the backfield with Frank Gore or DeShaun Foster you're going to have play the team a little more straight up.
Of all the position battles heading into training camp, this will definitely be one that requires some exhibition games to fully flesh out. I'd be pretty surprised if the team didn't keep a fullback, but I'd also be a little surprised to see them keep more than one.
0 recs |
4
comments
Read Related
Comments
Norris/Keasey vs Davis
I happen to think that Davis or Bajema could do just as adequate a job as Norris or Keasey as a lead back. If they need an athletic blocker, they can line up Davis in the backfield with Bajema on the line. Contrastly, if athleticism is what’s desired, having Davis or Walker lineup in the backfield with the other one on the line could pose some matchup issues for the opposition.
This is not to say that I don’t appreciate a true fullback like Norris, or that he doesn’t do a good job. I just think that with the talent level of this team this year, and all of the potential cuts of “potentially useful” players, Norris and Keasey HAVE to kind of be on their toes. In the end though, the 49ers will probably keep one of them, even if it’s only until injuries or other things (i.e. performance issues in other areas of the offense) make the 49ers NEED that roster spot for someone else (i.e. someone on the practice squad to join the active roster).
by sfgfan on Jul 14, 2008 12:01 PM PDT 0 recs
Gore's influence
I think that Gore’s close relationship with Norris will sway the 49er’s to keep him. Is Zak Keasey eligible for the practice squad again? Zak is the classic hardworking over-achiever that causes Nolan’s Reebok suit-pants to expand.
Alu mohe!
by Fana Chimes on Jul 14, 2008 4:47 PM PDT 0 recs
Keasy
Is he really all that great as a FB?
I always thought his value was as a special teams player, so I was surprised to hear him playing FB with the 1st team.
Anyways, it seems like the niners have all these great ST players (Keith, MRob, Hudson, Grant, etc) , so at this point, if Norris is just a tad better than Zak as a blocker, I’d keep Norris. ST help doesn’t really factor in to much to me at this point.
by DesertFox on Jul 14, 2008 7:46 PM PDT 0 recs
I think the choice...
... will be more like these:
- Morris or Thomas Clayton (a 4th “HB”)
- Morris or Marcus Hudson/Tarrel Brown (extra DB)
- Morris or keeping a 6th WR
I don’t think the decision will be between Keasey and Morris, though. It makes little sense to keep Keasey when there are many others on the team that contribute to special teams (i.e. Robinson, Grant, Ulbrich, etc.).
by sfgfan on
Jul 15, 2008 9:12 AM PDT
up
0 recs

















