San Francisco 49ers 37 - Chicago Bears 30: Talk about your offensive fireworks
425 yards of total offense by the 49ers tonight against the Chicago Bears. Last week, 355 yards of offense against the Green Bay Packers. Take a minute to soak those numbers in. While it is only the preseason and backups were in for significant chunks, we can still enjoy ourselves on occasion.
While the 49ers only won by 7 tonight, I really don't think the game was that close. Even when it was tied 20-20, I actually felt like the 49ers offense could pull this thing out. I can honestly say I don't remember the last time I had that feeling with the 49ers. Even when they were 2-0 last year, the team had struggled in victory. The year before most of us were surprised when they were 7-9 so we didn't expect anything. The two previous years they were 4-12 and 2-14, nuff said.
The Bears defense finished up pretty abysmally last season and they look well on their way to another horrid season in 2008. The way I look at it, the 49ers offense is clearly not 34 or 37 points a game good, but they're clearly not as bad as they were last year. If the defense can get some teeth, a league average offense could be more than enough to make some noise.
So, preseason game #3 is in the books and we had some more questions answered. Some questions will not be fully answered until the season starts, but we're getting some nice hints of things to come.
QB situation: It's official. J.T. O'Sullivan is the starting quarterback for this team. Maybe he loses the job midseason, but on September 7, O'Sullivan will be leading this offense against the Arizona Cardinals. Whether you still prefer Alex Smith, I think it's safe to say that O'Sullivan has not done anything to lose the job. Maybe he didn't deserve all the #1 snaps initially, but he showed he can make plays. He won't throw the prettiest pass and I'm sure he'll make at least one vomit-inducing poor decision every game. However, he knows this offense and will move the chains. I've got thoughts on Alex Smith, but I'm going to leave them for another post involving a whole lot of film breakdown. Suffice to say, his accuracy (or lack there of) is the death of him in the Mike Martz offense.
And briefly as to Shaun Hill. I realize he has a sizable fan contingent. As Rishi pointed out in the game thread, he was one of the lone bright spots in a season of crap. I do agree that he deserved better. At the same time, the physical attributes simply aren't there. I realize you don't need to have all the physical tools as many professional athletes have shown. At the same time, I think JTO has done enough for now to hold onto the job. I'm sure he'll have me eating my words within the first two quarters of the regular season.
Offensive Line: They only gave up one sack and O'Sullivan et al. seemed to have enough time in the pocket most of the time. I do need to rewatch the offense again to verify my thoughts. This is more just insticts (which have been wrong many times). I'm still anxious to see how they perform once the regular season gets here, but this is one question that I feel is hinting towards a rebirth. I think Eric Heitmann needed last season to reach a full recovery and should be solid this year. I'd like to keep De La Puente but I don't think the numbers will allow it. As for their abilities in the running game?
Running Backs: Thomas Clayton is officially THE MAN against backups! While partially joking, I'm serious in the fact that I really don't know what he'll be for the 49ers. If he goes back to the practice squad he can be signed by any other team. If your running backs are banged up, or you lack depth, wouldn't you take a flyer on the second year Clayton?
And what else needs to be said about Frank Gore? Frank the Tank looked to be in midseason form. I believe he shed some weight and he definitely seemed to have a little extra shiftiness tonight. He was bobbing and weaving and finding holes like the Pro Bowler that he is. Throw in the succesful screen plays and it's safe to say that Frank Gore is due for one hell of a season. Martz may be a passing fool, but his use of Gore has me excited.
Wide Receivers: After back-to-back impressive performances, Morgan was thrown to three times tonight and had no receptions. He got creamed on one over the middle play so I won't go calling him Alligator Arms (like our boy B. Lloyd). He's a rookie so there will be the occasional regression. He has no worries about a roster spot but this certainly didn't help his bid to score a starting spot.
Jason Hill on the other hand made some nice plays and combined with Morgan leaves me somewhat excited about the future of the wide receiver position for now. One disappointment will be if Zeigler doesn't make the team. I'm going to put together a 53-man roster look tomorrow or the next day and see what it would take to get him on the roster. He's been really consistent receiver with 4+ catches each game and making plays at opportune moments. They keep saying he'll be easy to slip through waivers to the practice squad, but I'm not so sure anymore.
Special Teams Coverage: Like clockwork, the 49ers had major headaches on special teams. The Bears averaged 40 yards per kick return and 20 yards per punt return. If this keeps up, the 49ers will be in trouble because the defense can't constantly defending only 50 or so yards per series. I honestly have no answers for these problems. Any ideas? I'm going to see what I can dig up.
Pass Rush: After a pass rush run wild against the Packers, the front seven was contained this week. I think this preseason sums up what we can expect from the pass rush. There will be some truly amazing performances, but there will also be some wild inconsistencies that make us want to pull our hair out. Ray McDonald ripping a couple sacks, followed by a couple offsides penalties. Hopefully it's more of the former, but we'll see.
General Thoughts: Normally I would say to myself, oh don't get too excited about high scoring in the preseason. However, I do NOT think this is a complete aberration. The running and passing game will lead to some high scoring games. While there will be struggles, the offense is clearly better than last season. In last year's preseason, the 49ers scored 13, 26, 28 and 13 points. So far this preseason it's 6, 34 and 37. Preseason is clearly the ultimate in small sample sizes, but nonetheless I'll take what I can get to stay excited.
Participation: Finally, another SB Nation site came up with an interesting website that allows me to plug in the game thread and figure out who commented in the thread and how many comments they posted. Aside from myself, bondslegend had 216 comments, 49ersLou had 98, Cruithear had 43, 408 had 26, CB30 had 6, Muy Macho had 4, and Rishi, gatling, jtoj and metal_militia all had 1 comments. Thanks to all for participating. Always good to get everyone's insights on the game.
0 recs |
29
comments
Read Related
Comments
A Happy Glimpse
I had to wake up and 2:30am to watch this game I am glad I did. The numbers posted up by the offense was impressive, I know it’s still just pre-season but it feels like we might be on the upswing. O’Sullivan showed good command of the offense, Smith seemed to strugle, and Hill had a good showing as well. I would like to see Hill get the starting spot but O’Sullivan will do. One of my bigger concerns is pass coverage. It seems that they where giving away some yards that they shouldn’t have to the pass. On the other side, the defense looked strong on stopping most of the run. We will see how they perform in week one, I have high hopes.
by ccslive on Aug 22, 2008 2:23 AM PDT 0 recs
JT
Being back east, last night was the first I’d seen of JT while I’ve seen Alex Smith all I care to the last 3 years. I’m sure there are plenty of reasons JT has been a career 3rd stringer and we’ll probably see them come out but last night was plenty of reason to at least think he can help the niners move the ball. Kurt Warner ran that offense without a particularly strong arm and no mobility to speak of. If JT makes good decisions and throws with the accuracy he showed last night there is no reason he can’t at least do it competently. Alex Smith still looks like a disaster. His throws are all over the place and they have no zip on them.
by Buckblog on Aug 22, 2008 5:01 AM PDT 0 recs
Last night was my first live glimpse of JT too (I’m also an east coaster at the moment), and watching his first TD pass I found myself giddy watching the Niners for the first time since the ’06 comeback in Seattle.
Still, one thing I can’t get out of my head the morning after is how clear it is that Smith is the better athlete. His right-sideline scramble to move the chains looked effortless, and he had some serious zip on his passes. It’s infuriating that he can’t be accurate with any greater consistency.
So as whole-heartedly as I endorse beginning the season with JT, there is a big part of me that wants Alex to get to the point where he fully grasps the offense and can hit his receivers with confidence, so that he can potentially put pressure on O’Sullivan in October or November.
If JT turns out to be the next Kurt Warner, we’ll ride him ‘til he drops, but if he’s just Jon Kitna… Well, I’d hate to cut Smith loose in the offseason only to watch him become a star for Tampa Bay or Minnesota.
Baywatching - daily news & commentary on all things Niners, Giants, Warriors, and Cardinal
by sven406 on
Aug 22, 2008 7:44 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Well, I’d hate to cut Smith loose in the offseason only to watch him become a star for Tampa Bay or Minnesota.
I think it’s pretty clear that this won’t happen, rest assured. It’s not like the 49ers are such an awful team that he can’t show his abilities. This is at least an average team outside of the QB position, and O’Sullivan sure showed he could make things work. As much as I would love to see Smith grasp the offense and become more confident in his game, I just don’t see that happening at this point. Whether it be all the sacks he took in his first couple years, the OC turnover, or just plain losing all the time, his confidence seems permanently rattled. Wasn’t he heralded as very accurate in the short-to-medium pass game? Now, he not only can’t throw the ball deep with any consistency, he also can’t seem to hit the medium-range passes consistently.
Fooch is right: O’Sullivan is our QB, whether we like it or not. It’s going to be an entertaining season, methinks.
STEVE HOLM! refuses to be the odd man out.
by UnleashTheGore on
Aug 22, 2008 8:15 AM PDT
up
0 recs
JTO is our starter...
But for how long? I’m on-board, kinda, but I have a feeling there’s going to be some musical chairs this season.
by Rishi on Aug 22, 2008 8:44 AM PDT 0 recs
+1
I have a feeling we’ll be seeing Smith before the year’s over, for better or for worse.
"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f**kin' amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK
by Josh from Hollywood on
Aug 22, 2008 4:05 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Any thoughts on why Alex Smith is so off on his accuracy? I was wondering if maybe the arm isn’t really 100%. Maybe Nolan knew that and that is why JTO was given the starting spot.
Simply by pulling on both ends, Patrick Willis can stretch diamonds back into coal
by 49erLou on Aug 22, 2008 8:50 AM PDT 0 recs
I think it's his confidence
I think it’s pretty much been shattered, and he, for the first time, has crumpled under the pressure of competing for a starting job. He’s probably worrying too much about playing perfectly. Just my guess, though.
STEVE HOLM! refuses to be the odd man out.
by UnleashTheGore on
Aug 22, 2008 9:55 AM PDT
up
0 recs
HE switched his mechanics this year...
Mike Martz has him holding the ball and setting his feet differently then before. His hand is a seam further down, his shoulders know face more to the sidelines (This throws of DBs) and his arm is cocked by his arm pit’; all are designed to give Alex a quicker release. Also the way he drops back and gets set in the pocket has improved as he does seem to get setup faster with his eyes downfield quicker. He may not look it but he has been getting rid of the ball quicker this year. But I don’t think that’s just it. I think he doesn’t have full trust in himself with Mike Martz;s offense. He is supposed to know exactly when a WR is going to break and the routes that they are going run but I don’t think he has the confidence in his WRs/TEs/RBs to fully commit to a pass like that. But I also think some of his accuracy problems is just Alex Smith being Alex Smith. But with all his accuracy problems he didn’t throw a pick all preseason, which means he knows where to put the ball… he’s just having trouble sealing the deal.
Next year will be our year! (copyright 2003*, been used each of last five years)
by StrictlyFootball on
Aug 22, 2008 10:21 AM PDT
up
0 recs
yeah, I rewatched a few of the series he played and he did look like he just isn’t confident in himself. or anything else i guess. i feel bad for the guy.
Simply by pulling on both ends, Patrick Willis can stretch diamonds back into coal
by 49erLou on
Aug 22, 2008 10:25 AM PDT
up
0 recs
ARGH IT'S SO FRUSTRATING...
I’ve seen the potential for years, we all have, with Norv Turner he hit Antonio Bryant deep multiple times, he was accurate, he was good especially later in the year when he got comfortable. SO WHY CAN’T HE PUT IT TOGETHER DAMN IT!!!
Next year will be our year! (copyright 2003*, been used each of last five years)
by StrictlyFootball on
Aug 22, 2008 11:19 AM PDT
up
0 recs
That's what drives me nuts, too.
He’s still my starter in Madden, damn it. At least there he can put it together. lol
by sfgfan on
Aug 22, 2008 3:34 PM PDT
up
0 recs
This is exactly how I feel.
Accuracy has never been his strong suit, but I thought he got it at least to the level of “average” under Norv. Now, it’s somewhere between “below-average” and “Holy crap, he’s bad”. I mean, it’s just so predictable now — receiver open deep, pass way underthrown; receiver open across the middle, pass behind him.
I don’t know if he’s hurt, uncomfortable in the offense, crumbling under the pressure, or just bad — but it doesn’t really matter, does it?
"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f**kin' amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK
by Josh from Hollywood on
Aug 22, 2008 4:04 PM PDT
up
0 recs
he’s never been very accurate. having poor mechanics, and injury and confidence problems doesn’t help.
Lott's Prayer: Almost as many words as the Lord's Prayer, but the Lord wouldn't recognize any of them.
by Nosetackle Supreme on
Aug 22, 2008 10:29 AM PDT
up
0 recs
JTO
He won’t throw the prettiest pass and I’m sure he’ll make at least one vomit-inducing poor decision every game.
Welcome to the JTO era. I’m overflowing with optimism for this season.
Never forget: I am a complete idiot
by Exhibit G on Aug 22, 2008 10:14 AM PDT 0 recs
ST
don’t forget the blocked field goal and the blocked punt allowed by our Not So Special Teams
Simply by pulling on both ends, Patrick Willis can stretch diamonds back into coal
by 49erLou on Aug 22, 2008 10:22 AM PDT 0 recs
Last year the “Smith and Dilfer Show” was the most depressing time I’ve spent as a Niner fan. Until Hill came in and salvaged the end of the season, I could not take the never ending spectacle of balls over and under thrown – it was truly unwatchable. Hill, who salvaged the end of the season, had the same coordinator, the same line, the same receivers as Smith, and yet he had a quarterback rating over 100 and Smith was under 50. I’m sure that all this didn’t bode well with Martz, who felt he needed another option for quarterback. I know it’s early, but I see a little bit of Kurt Warner in J.T. and one thing is evident – the guy has some great down field vision. I don’t want to get too negative about Smith, but thinking that he’s going to suddenly turn into an Archie or Eli Manning is delusional.
by Danny Boy on Aug 22, 2008 10:27 AM PDT 0 recs
Smith lovers
Will tell you he was injured, and the OL was worse at the beginning of the year.
That being said, I agree with you.
STEVE HOLM! refuses to be the odd man out.
by UnleashTheGore on
Aug 22, 2008 11:49 AM PDT
up
0 recs
You don’t have to be a Smith lover to recognize the difficulties he faced last season that were were outside of his control.
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
by howtheyscored on
Aug 22, 2008 12:12 PM PDT
up
0 recs
But if you're a Smith hater (for lack of a better term)
You can easily see that he’s not going to make it as a starting QB, injury-free or not.
STEVE HOLM! refuses to be the odd man out.
by UnleashTheGore on
Aug 22, 2008 4:23 PM PDT
up
0 recs
That’s probably taking a little too far in the other direction, though. To say he’s going to succeed is ridiculous, but to say he has no chance but to fail is equally indefensible.
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
by howtheyscored on
Aug 23, 2008 11:30 AM PDT
up
0 recs
timeouts
I know it is preseason, but wasting all our timeouts in the first half denied us the opportunity to challenge that OBVIOUSLY BLOWN SAFETY CALL. The misuse of timeouts was a major problem last year and hopefully, this situation needs to be resolved. This problem goes directly to coaching, though using inexperienced players certainly contributes.
in the first half, we blew one on our very 1st drive (on a 2nd and 5), and 2 on the same drive to start the 2nd quarter. Granted, the last two were before 3rd down plays, but still. Our guys need to have a better idea of what’s going on out there.
Lott's Prayer: Almost as many words as the Lord's Prayer, but the Lord wouldn't recognize any of them.
by Nosetackle Supreme on Aug 22, 2008 10:27 AM PDT 0 recs
Slightly OT:
Why in heaven’s name would anyone challenge a call in preseason football? The purpose of these games is to get your players experience, not to win the game necessarily (obviously you would like to). All challenges do in preseason is to bog down an already barely-watchable game.
STEVE HOLM! refuses to be the odd man out.
by UnleashTheGore on
Aug 22, 2008 11:50 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Even the coaches need to practice.
My Dave Righetti is better than your Dave Righetti.
by howtheyscored on
Aug 22, 2008 12:13 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Exactly.
The head coaches (and players) need to get a feel for when a challenge needs to (or will be made). I think Nolan would have challenged it if timeouts weren’t gone. I was in and out of the TV room during the first half, so I didn’t catch the burning of any of the time outs. Were they called by the coaching staff or the players? I noticed previously (in the past couple of seasons), the QB (namely Smith) calling timeouts in the first quarter and such. I don’t think you can blame coaching for all of the misuse of timeouts, as players mess them up too (but I DO admit Nolan has called his poor share of them as well).
What drove me nuts is that after that first big pass from O’Sullivan to Davis along the sideline (that was one ugly pass, BTW), it looked like O’Sullivan was hurrying people up to the line and yet they gave the Bears enough time to challenge the play. Granted, the play stood and no harm was done, but they REALLY should have just snapped the damn ball. Heck call a hand-off to Keasey (I think they had two fullbacks in the backfield during that play) if that’s what it takes. Just get the guys down the field and snap the ball.
by sfgfan on
Aug 22, 2008 3:39 PM PDT
up
0 recs
“The head coaches (and players) need to get a feel for when a challenge needs to (or will be made).”
Especially Nolan, who let quite a few good challenge opportunities slip past him the last few years. Last year’s Carolina game, when he blew two chances, comes immediately to mind.
"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f**kin' amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK
by Josh from Hollywood on
Aug 22, 2008 4:09 PM PDT
up
0 recs
The head coaches (and players) need to get a feel for when a challenge needs to (or will be made).
Not to be a negative Nelly, but couldn’t you just think in your head, “OK I would have challenged that, let’s move on”? I don’t understand the benefit of actually going through with the challenge makes them more prepared. Also, how much practice do you really need in knowing when to make a challenge? Even as an armchair QB, I can tell when something should be challenged—and I don’t even have a guy in the booth looking at a replay at every angle telling me if I should make it. Maybe I don’t give them enough credit, I dunno.
STEVE HOLM! refuses to be the odd man out.
by UnleashTheGore on
Aug 22, 2008 4:28 PM PDT
up
0 recs
“couldn’t you just think in your head, "OK I would have challenged that, let’s move on"? I don’t understand the benefit of actually going through with the challenge makes them more prepared.”
You may know you would’ve challenged, but you don’t know how the refs would’ve ruled. Every challenge is an opportunity to get a better idea of how refs call certain plays. For instance, what if the refs had ruled Hester wasn’t 100% out of the end zone? Maybe then, Nolan would be slower to challenge a similar call in the regular season unless it’s more obvious. Another example would be that after the “tuck rule” call in NE, coaches became much more aware of a rule nobody knew very well, and have since been much more likely to challenge plays where their QB fumbled.
“how much practice do you really need in knowing when to make a challenge?”
If you’re Mike Nolan, apparently you need a lot, because after 3 full seasons, he still has not shown he has any idea when to do it.
"I been waitin' a long time for this! I been waitin' since the f**kin' amateurs!" --WILL "THE THRILL" CLARK
by Josh from Hollywood on
Aug 22, 2008 4:38 PM PDT
up
0 recs
People are really crying about the timeouts? Really? Sheesh.
Wanted to add my two cents on O’Sullivan. I was rooting against the guy but he has proven that he can make the throws he needs to make. The 37-yarder to Hill made me say “What just happened?!”
O’Sullivan has taken steps forward with every appearance. Since that horrid 1st quarter against Green Bay he’s 12/15 for 240 yds and 2 TD’s, 158.3 rating. Not saying he’s Tom Brady or anything. Not even saying he’s Kurt Warner. I hope he can maintain this improvement.
by Indiana Jim on Aug 23, 2008 9:30 AM PDT 0 recs

















