Niners Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Doug Flutie's Hail Mary, And Why College Sports Matter

Jimmy Raye Approval Rating, Week 3

Jimmy_raye_approval_rating_medium

Alright, due to popular demand, I've decided it's time for the Jimmy Raye Approval Rating.  There has been a lot of complaints about the play-calling and I am especially curious to see how many people are fed up with Jimmy Raye.  In the Mike Singletary posts I've asked the No voters to provide reasons for voting No.  In this poll, since I'm guessing it will not be quite the wave of support we see for Singletary, I'd like Yes voters to provide their reasons.  At this point I'm actually not quite sure how I'd vote.  I'm going to think it over, vote and then throw out some reasons for my vote and also for the other side.

The timing of this works out really well thanks to Florida Danny's post this morning.  Danny looked at the newest set of DVOA rankings and had some interesting thoughts about the play-calling.  If you haven't had a chance to check it out, I think it's worth a read before voting in this poll.

I do think there has been some good and bad in the play-calling.  Although the stats indicate a team passing much more than they might have declared (see the 60/40 run declaration), most folks would agree there have been opportunities to pass that have in fact been passed up (no pun intended).  At the same time, when they have gone to the air, the team seems to be dialing up some solid plays.  Raye indicated he wanted to take advantage of having an athletic freak like Vernon Davis, and he's done a pretty good job at that when Davis is utilized.

This week could be especially interesting in the passing game.  Coach Singletary said in his most recent press conference that the team would not change things up just because they have a rookie in at running back.  And yet, one has to wonder if that's a little bit of gamesmanship.  Might we see a more active Vernon Davis this week?  Might we see an actually active Brandon Jones or Jason Hill?  If you've been dying to start a 49ers WR or TE in your fantasy league, this week and next week might very well be your two best opportunities.  I could be entirely wrong, but just call it a feeling.

Poll
Do you approve of the job Jimmy Raye is doing as offensive coordinator?
Yes
478 votes
No
447 votes

925 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 94 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Whoops

Forgot to include the poll. It’s attached now.

by Fooch on Oct 1, 2009 11:17 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I voted no

But it’s not like he’s got Montana and Rice to work with, so it’s not an emphatic no.

But, also, it’s really disappointing that we had two chances to kill the Vikings game and went 3 and out on both of them.

Proud father of Juan Carlos Perez. Think Albert Pujols at a position to be determined.

by marcello on Oct 1, 2009 11:40 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I voted yes...

but only because I don’t think I disapprove….consider me on the yes side of the middle.

Never use a big word where a diminutive alternative would suffice.

by YoungWillis on Oct 1, 2009 11:43 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I voted yes

because I love what he is doing with Vernon Davis.
I am hoping that Nate Davis gets a chance next season and they open up the passing attack.. more balanced. Davis to Davis, Davis to Morgan, Davis to Jones and Maybe even a Davis to Crabtree connection.. with Gore and Coffee and maybe even Sheets that will be fun to watch.
Back to this season: It looks to me like the team is learning the offense and learning to play together as a whole… each week I see some things get better and that is exciting.

Also, how can you not like the 49ers being 2 an 1 and a game ahead in our own division? This year is fun and next year could darn well be exciting!

"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"

by Eastbayjim on Oct 1, 2009 11:53 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Put more trust in Hill!!!

They named him starter. Almost every time they have trusted him to throw the ball this year, he has delivered. Give him more trust.

"Bar None!" - William Floyd

by maveric_87 on Oct 1, 2009 11:56 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Top 10 in points

Although I have been less than impressed overall, in the end we are in the top 10 in points per game, we’re protecting the ball, and its still probably the best the niner offense has looked in a while. It’s really results that matter isn’t it?

Does anybody else think we should maybe give Johnson or Rathman a chance to make calls? I know that’s abnormal in the NFL for a coordinator to let someone else make calls, but from what I understand Jimmy was brought in because he has a great way of teaching football and creating the right run-first power mentality. That doesn’t mean he has the best on-the-fly play calling ability. In fact, given his history it sounds like that might be his weakest point. Maybe we should start a movement…

by NH49er on Oct 1, 2009 11:57 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Time of Possession only matters when you're putting up 6 at the end of those drives.

Anyone but the Miami Dolphins would agree with that, I think.

My pessimism goes to the point of suspecting the sincerity of the pessimists.

by shlecko on Oct 1, 2009 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Failure

That’s not true. Time of possession does count, even if you don’t put up 6 points.

by bignerd on Oct 1, 2009 10:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

TOP is one of those things that does matter with rare exceptions

The old Jim Kelly Bills won big while constantly losing TOP due to the no-huddle offense. But they lost the Super Bowl because their opponent hogged the ball and shortened the game, therefore limiting the number of possessions their high powered offense received. Whether you’re playing a dominant offense or an average one, why give them more opportunities? I also think TOP is the kind of stat benefit that shows itself in December, when your defense has played significantly fewer snaps.

Side note: Miami’s game plan vs Indy was perfect in that it was the only way they could beat a better team. Their failing was missing a FG and an inability to run the 2-minute drill at the end, not the philosophy to shorten the game and wear out the Indy defense.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 2, 2009 1:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Im on the yes side, and I will now explain myself

He hasnt been an OC, and therefore hasnt been calling plays for some 6-8 years (the exact number slips me and I dont feel like looking it up. What does this mean? Means he still needs to get the hang of it, the feel of it, and it also means theres nowhere to go but up, and theres room to improve, and it will. I believe the playcalling in weeks 9-17 will be much different than what were seeing now.

Stability. JR is not going to be looked up for any Head Coaching assignments, no matter how well the offense does, which means we can keep him around for a few years should we want to. I would like some stability.

Lets just be honest, if this is him sucking, and were 2-1, and were in a position to be 3-0, and his gameplaning and calling can only get better from here…..is there really a problem? I reserve the right to change my mind, but as far as right now, Im behind him

by Sloan on Oct 1, 2009 11:59 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

No, but just barely and not for a lot of the reasons I think most people are saying no

I love how he’s utilizing Davis but that’s really it, no one else is being used vary well, even Gore.

Our struggles on 1st and 2nd down and average distance to go on 3rd down alone dictate a disapproval.

I just want him to adapt to situations which was something Martz was terrible at. Know that we might need to throw a little bit more to set up the run, and run more play action later in the game

by foosball4949 on Oct 1, 2009 12:01 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Mix it up a bit

I have never been a fan of the run first offense ever since we had so much success with the West Coast Offense. You have to keep the defense honest, when they are putting 8 or 9 men in the box, there are a few plays besides the run that should work. All I am saying is mix it up. A short pass is almost like a run anyways.

by 49RFAN on Oct 1, 2009 12:01 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I voted Yes as well

Raye’s play calling has left something to be desired at times, but we have only played 3 games and have won 2 of those and almost a 3rd.

Even though we lost the game and the last two drives for the offense were hard to take, his play calling put us in the lead late in the game and we are scoring points. It is true that the recent years of offensive ineptitude allow me to not get too down on Raye. I think our next few games will be more telling in that Raye, after coming off a lose and having his formula fail for the first time this season, will have to make adjustments.

Here’s to hoping that he does.

by CLS on Oct 1, 2009 12:07 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yes from me

He is doing what he can with the players he has. Those running plays may have worked if Gore had still been in the game. He was not, they did not work.

As it was we kept the game winnable against a strong team and ended up being just a play or two short of being 3-0.

Lets go in and watch our numbers skyrocket against a weak team and then we can see where we end up in the lists.

1 loss does not end a season…it was not a heartbreaking loss, it was not a win that was stolen from us. It was the team fighting till then end and coming up short against a HoF QB. I am ok with that.

If we lose to the Rams next week then I will have to think about my vote though…

by 9erEast on Oct 1, 2009 12:23 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Has to be yes for me

We don’t give the game away with turnovers. Our defense always has green behind them (usually). We beat the Seahawks and Cards and are still 2-0 in the division. We have a chance to start 3-0 in the division for the first time since 2002. Vernon Davis is beasting. We put up 24 points against the Vikings without Gore. We are shorthanded on receivers and we get Jones back. I think Sing holds him back from passing more.

BKA optimist prime- Got the Semi runnin' on 49er koolaid!!
Blasphemous beings, the NINERS will never forget!!
Eric Berry anyone?

by rlott#42 on Oct 1, 2009 12:28 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

We put up 24 points against the Vikings without Gore.

If “we” includes Ray McDonald and Nate Clements, then this is correct.

My pessimism goes to the point of suspecting the sincerity of the pessimists.

by shlecko on Oct 1, 2009 2:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We as in the team!!

BKA optimist prime- Got the Semi runnin' on 49er koolaid!!
Blasphemous beings, the NINERS will never forget!!
Eric Berry anyone?

by rlott#42 on Oct 1, 2009 9:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I voted No however;

As everyone is stating this issue is far from a yes/no thing. There is a lot of things to be optimistic about. On the other hand there is a certain lack of creativity and surprise in the calls I have seen thus far. I have yet to say….. WOW that was brilliant!

by Natural Red on Oct 1, 2009 12:33 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree

This is what makes it so difficult to judge Raye. Nothing that says WOW, but we have won some games.

The approval poll is looking like a coin flip at the moment and I think that describes how a lot of people feel about Raye.

by CLS on Oct 1, 2009 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes

Since us Yes’s have been asked to explain, I would just say that, hey, we’re winning. There are a heck of a lot of people on this site who know more about the intricacies of this game than me (some might say everyone knows more, ha ha …) but, look, we’re 2-1. I bet if the offence hadn’t given the ball back to Brett Favre with seconds left last Sunday, the vast majority on here would be voting Yes. But the fact that a sub-standard OL (not Jimmy’s fault) and a rookie RB couldn’t between them pound out a first down doesn’t make Jimmy a bad OC, right? If he’d called for a pass and Hill had thrown a pick, and Minnesota had run the ball back for a TD, he’d have been rightly pilloried wouldn’t he?

I also love what he’s doing with VD, as others have said.

And more than anything else, if you believe in Mike (I do), and Mike believes in Jimmy (he does) then you believe in Jimmy.

Go Niners. 3-1 this Sunday. The Silence of the Lambs.

"This could be another Very Special Team" ... Superbowl winning Niners lineman Dan Audick ...

by LondonNiner on Oct 1, 2009 12:44 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

However

I love that he utilizes Davis in the game

by dalien82 on Oct 1, 2009 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

There should be a indiferent option

Im ambivalent on one hand we are successful on the other we are not. They need more options with that side tackle Morgn run. I like the play but I know we are gana run but I would like Raye to mix it up with a slant or slant and go with morgan

by dalien82 on Oct 1, 2009 12:45 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm not voting

I don’t like some of the calls, and I think the conservative calls a slightly too conservative for me (passing can open up the run game), but I understand the offense on this team is essentially an offshoot of the defense.

I can’t vote on Raye specifically because he is doing exactly what Singletary wants. If Sing reconsiders and tries a few more passes, then that’s what Raye will call.

Maybe Jones will stretch the field a little this weekend.

by Bob On The Coast on Oct 1, 2009 12:48 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Further more: BOLD PREDICTION

Hill 300 yards passing vs. the Rams

by dalien82 on Oct 1, 2009 12:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Everyone's points have been valid today;

I would love to see some quick reads on pass plays to help move opposing linebackers back a little to help open up the run.

by Natural Red on Oct 1, 2009 12:54 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Still too early. Ask me after the BYE.

It’s only the third game and Raye hasn’t had a lot of experience with this personnel group. I’m hoping he will open things up a bit as he gains confidence in Hill and the receivers. But if he’s still stubbornly running Coffee into 8-9 man fronts for zero gains in the Atlanta game, I’ll be warming up the hotseat.

by MontanaPass on Oct 1, 2009 12:55 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I voted Yes but...

I have to say that I am partial to it… There have been times that I have been on board and other times I wanted to throw my beer threw the TV. It’s just too early to tell. I will say this, if I see 3 more run plays in a row again after it’s clearly not working, that beer may just end up going threw the flat screen.

As of right now it looks like the results of the poll are pretty much even. I think that it will stay that way. I just hope that as the season matures, we see more guts and more of a “go for the throat” mentality with Raye. When teams are down and barely clinging to life, I don’t think that is the best time to play conservatively. I think he exploits matchup mismatches very well, but it’s the play-calling that I have questioned at times

Last week: I did not get going for it 4th and 1 and getting it because of the guts and at the end when we needed to “finish” we sort of just laid down with the 3 runs in a row and passed the torch to the D. I feel there is more “conservative” pass plays that could have been called on that last 3rd and 7.

Anyway… I am sort of at a stalemate with this topic right now…we’ll see what happens as the season progresses. I’m on the fence about it as of now though and I am giving him the benefit of the doubt, hence my “YES” vote.

by Drew K on Oct 1, 2009 12:57 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Add to last comment...

I would love to see some quick reads on pass plays to back the opposing linebackers off a bit and open up the run a little more.

by Natural Red on Oct 1, 2009 1:00 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Maybe

If Raye opens up the playbook a little more and starts using the receiver more, Crabtree will sign his contract……I kid I kid.

by GeeMunster on Oct 1, 2009 1:03 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Run game

I don’t like his play calling when he decides to run. All he does is run up the middle against the blitz(VERY FRUSTRATING). It is soooo predictable!!! On 99% of our run plays, Josh Morgan motions and stops right behind the tackles. I think Frank Gore and Glen Coffee are fast enough to run outside, away from the blitz. We coud’ve easily beat minnesota if he woul’ve ran outside a few times on 2nd and 3rd and short. Running up the gut against the blitz gets us very few yards and puts our passing game in 2nd and 3rd and long all day long. At that point the defense know that we have to pass and blitz the house. Never fails on 3rd downs.

by Ninerfan4life on Oct 1, 2009 2:15 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I like Raye, but voted no

By a small margin of weighing. We could do worse (and we have), but I know we could do better. I like the confidence there is on the defense, but a little more confidence in the offense would help. I like Raye, but 0-11 on 3rd downs don’t get you yes votes.

by Ovalshine on Oct 1, 2009 2:15 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

wow given his name and that hat hes wearing

ive gotta say that his play calling hasnt been DY-NO-MITE!!!

by Rep the Bay on Oct 1, 2009 2:17 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Defense

Without our tough defense, we would probably be 0 and 3 and people would look at his play calling a lot different. I think that he keeps our defense on the field too much with his run run mentality and like i mentioned before. He always runs against the middle blitz. If he were to run outside of the tackles more often. It would keep the opposing defenses more honest.

by Ninerfan4life on Oct 1, 2009 2:20 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

How is this even close to an even race?

Have people not watched the past couple weeks of 49ers football, or is it that no one has seen enough football games outside of our team to remember what an effective offense looks like? Raye’s playbook appears to be miniscule and his play call selection has been absolutely horrendous.

My pessimism goes to the point of suspecting the sincerity of the pessimists.

by shlecko on Oct 1, 2009 2:27 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Say it like it is

  In 2 of the 3 games, the running attack " fizzled ". It’s most likely a combination the OL and Raye call playing. I don’t see anything that makes me think that the OL is that bad, Okay maybe, but on the other hand, I’m not seeing sweeps or any type of running to the outside. It’s straight down the Middle. Hill is a good QB and we have a good set of WR. Use them ! That why they call it " PASS " !

by LASVEGASNINER on Oct 1, 2009 2:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

There has been toss plays and runs off tackle.

Not everything has been up the middle. Thats not really telling the truth when you say everything or even a majority has been A gap runs

by Drew K on Oct 1, 2009 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think they

just LOOK like A-gap runs because 1/2 the time the Defensive line has already penetrated past the O-Line when the ball in handed off.

FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.

by zenbitz on Oct 1, 2009 3:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Excellent point

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 2, 2009 1:54 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We did run a nice toss and if it had been EXECUTED, would have been a nice play.

And was nearly a turnover. If it was a fumble, then what? Would we blame Raye for running a stupid toss? When you say you’d except a win by one point (no one in specific) be happy with an ugly win if that’s what it is. I’d rather lose a close one than lose one because we lost the turnover battle.

BKA optimist prime- Got the Semi runnin' on 49er koolaid!!
Blasphemous beings, the NINERS will never forget!!
Eric Berry anyone?

by rlott#42 on Oct 1, 2009 9:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

I understand the Raye and Singletary approach to wanting to play hard and physical (or conservative) but change it up a bit. There are so many different ways to run the ball and get those yards. He doesn’t mix it up at all. Rarely stretches the line with sweeps. Very few screens or draws. You can mix it up and still play conservative!!

by agchee on Oct 1, 2009 9:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I abstain

the offense is wretched – most of all the offensive line. With a bad OL there is no amount of brilliant strategy or play calling that is going to get you yards.

FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.

by zenbitz on Oct 1, 2009 3:39 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Anatamy of a NO

We run a lot. That is good, and with this defense, that’s what we should do.
A slow, ball control game is what we should play each and every week, regardless of our opponents. We’ll have a nice test when we take on Indy and Hou, to see if we stick to that formula….and not play to another team’s style.
So, I say NO, because we could have actually run more at this point, and we could still have gore ready to go this week. Running up the gut is tough on a brother’s ankles. If we continue to take it to the teeth of the D, we might cut Coffee short on juice too. I like what I saw in the preseason…a lot of offensive linemen getting out in space and stretching the D laterally. Let Gore/Cof hit the safeties and line backers rather than the 300 pounder’s up front.
I like our guys in space, and we have a heck of a good blocking set of WR’s.
That being said, I also think we could throw more screens. I consider that to be part of the running game too.
he’s been a little too predictable thus far.
this week should present new opportunities for his game plan though.

by t p on Oct 1, 2009 3:41 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Niner fans make me laugh

BESIDES Frank Gore, how many OFFENSIVE players on the 49ers have been touted, by most fans, as being GREAT players?

Answer? Not many (LOL). (Actually, most others, from the QB on down, are almost consistently derided by ‘most’ fans).

Your OC, however, is part of the coaching staff that has the 49ers at 2-1, over ‘better heralded’ OC’s such as Ken Whisenhunt and Gregg Knapp.

Too funny.

I mean, the 49ers BEAT the Arizona Cardinals, opening day. The Arizona Cardinals of Ken Whisenhunt (he being the OC when the Steelers won it all in 2005 and the HC when Arizona came within 2:37 minutes of shocking the world with an upset win in last season’s SB).

The Cardinals of Kurt Warner, who has been BOTH the league MVP and the SB MVP.

The Cradinals of Larry Fitzgerald, commonly considered one of, if not THE best WR in the NFL..

YOUR 49ers, with your ‘sad sack’ OC Jimmy Raye, has the 49ers at 2-1 and ONE play away from being 3-0.

Keep Bit++ing and Moaning.

It’s HYSTERICAL.

(BTW: Ask Dan Snyder, if he’d trade places RIGHT NOW)!

Mike Singletary & Jimmy Raye for Jim Zorn & the ‘premier FA in the offseason,’ Albert Haynesworth.

I’m guessing old Danny boy would make that trade in a NEw York minute!

by GeoMak on Oct 1, 2009 7:26 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

This deseves a blogging OSCAR!!

rec’d

BKA optimist prime- Got the Semi runnin' on 49er koolaid!!
Blasphemous beings, the NINERS will never forget!!
Eric Berry anyone?

by rlott#42 on Oct 1, 2009 10:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks for the perspective

To add on, what Offensive Coordinator has been great with this 49ers squad? Really, it’s the offensive personnel, not the coaches . . . blame the GM for adding nothing to the offense other than backup for Gore this season.

Everyone want’s to pretend a guy like Norv Turner could fix this problem. But you forget Norv ran, ran and ran into a brick wall for 3 quarters until those runs started working in the 4th. You may also forget that when Norv was here the 49ers had Larry Allen (HOF if they let guards in) and a healthy Jonas Jennings (above average) blowing people up on the offensive line. We’ve never had that kind of strength on the offensive line since, hence it’s been 3 horrible years of suckitude.

by bignerd on Oct 1, 2009 10:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ummm..

Manusky’s defense deserves a heckuva lot more credit for the wins than Raye’s offense does.

Well, we're waiting....

by drummer on Oct 2, 2009 1:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe that’s a reply to GeoMak but I was feeding off his sub argument of a lack of offensive personnel. Maybe it’s time to get real with expectations for this offensive unit.

by bignerd on Oct 2, 2009 12:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think we have already..

Because without the continuity of having Manusky coach the defense, the 49ers could be struggling on both sides of the ball instead of one.

The turnover at OC is a major cause as well. We all had a reason to suspect the talent, and we all were suspect of Raye from the day he was hired. The 49ers are still a work in progress, and OCT and NOV will be telling months as far as how far they can go. SEP has proven favorable in sched due to 3 games in the NFCW. Defense, STs, and field position have been key in 3 games so far.

Well, we're waiting....

by drummer on Oct 2, 2009 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Manusky is a different argument

Certainly Nolan showed how worst to use the defensive personnel.

I happen to think Singletary’s motivational ability to get guys to dedicate themselves to the off season strengthening program has had as much to do with defense’s improvement as Manusky’s simplified scheme.

by bignerd on Oct 2, 2009 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I happen to think...

That having continuity is coordinators also means you don’t have to concentrate on having the team adjust to them.

Well, we're waiting....

by drummer on Oct 2, 2009 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

At least Norv...

…mixed things up with runs around the corner and play-action passes. BTW, just to clarify, are you seriously suggesting that Raye is as good an OC as Turner?

by Bigmouth on Oct 2, 2009 7:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I’m suggesting the problem isn’t the offensive coordinator. A key element of any play is the ability to block.

by bignerd on Oct 2, 2009 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not as much as we laugh at you..

especially with a post completely devoid of insight, like normal.

But. that’s why you’re here, to give us your “Superior Football Knowledge”.

Bwah!

Well, we're waiting....

by drummer on Oct 2, 2009 1:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

How did I know...

…that this ridiculous comment would be authored by GeoMak? My favorite part is where she argues that Jimmy Raye is great because…drum roll please…Jim Zorn and Dan Snyder are idiots. Breathtaking logic!

by Bigmouth on Oct 2, 2009 7:46 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

OC

People aren’t obviously not complaining about being 2-1. A bit under 50% of folks are unhappy with Jimmy Raye’s work as OC to some extent and your comment is not really about that. But the offense hasn’t exactly carried the day. This team is winning in spite of a not so good offense.

I do think the team’s offense is going to get better, but at this point I can see why people are voting no on this. I end up electing to vote yes, because I think I can see where this might be going. But at this point, I bet if a maybe or on the fence option was added to the poll, a lot of folks would vote for that.

The 49ers did beat the Cardinals and Shaun Hill did drive them down the field for a big touchdown, but I’d argue the defense deserves a lot more of the praise for that win, not the offense.

by Fooch on Oct 2, 2009 10:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fooch

How many offensive coordinators do we need to toss out before it’s obvious the problem isn’t the guy calling the plays? This argument might have a bit of merit if this offense actually produced before Jimmy Raye came aboard. It’s been putrid the few years before Jimmy Raye arrived and it’s still putrid now. I’m tired of all the {site decorum}ing about changing the offensive coordinator during the season and all the excuses during the off season because the team has no continuity from changing offensive coordinators! Maybe I am the only one taking crazy pills? Really, the issue has been the playbook since 2005?

Give Raye credit for at least figuring out Shaun Hill can produce 2 TD drives a game and the unit is most effective (or least negatively effective) by running the clock down. Playing off those two principals alone has made this offense and team more effective.

by bignerd on Oct 2, 2009 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

*did

Well, we're waiting....

by drummer on Oct 2, 2009 12:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

According to Football Outsiders

2009 – 27th (so far)
2008 – 27th
2007 – 32nd
2006 – 23rd (w/ Norv)

by bignerd on Oct 2, 2009 1:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

They were 22nd in scoring..

last season, not according to FO. Where we they the previous season? 32nd. Where would they be if they had continuity at OC?

Well, we're waiting....

by drummer on Oct 2, 2009 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Probably the same

Because the problem isn’t the offensive coordinator it’s been the players on offense or I should say not enough good players on offense.

by bignerd on Oct 2, 2009 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So you're saying..

The offensive players that we thought were good last season aren’t really good this season, because of the talent.

Ok.

Well, we're waiting....

by drummer on Oct 2, 2009 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nope, we don’t have enough good offensive players. I like Hill, Gore, VD, Morgan, Bruce, Staley and Heitmann. However Snyder is below average at position that is very important to the run game. Chilo’s inexperience and whiff blocks have cost this team 2 possessions a game with huge negative, drive killing plays and Baas is probably around the average line. Good offenses have good offensive lines. We need a better RT and a better Guard.

by bignerd on Oct 2, 2009 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And we're just figuring that out now?..

The O-line has been a problem for years.

Changing offensive schemes and philosophy, as well as neglect on draft day, shows the real problem.

If you install an offense in year 1, you should be running that offense in year 3.

How long has ScotM been in charge of personnel? Yet the offense still stinks?

LOL, the players weren’t good enough for Martz’s offense, yet they still improved in scoring.

Bring in Raye, and the offense and players get worse.

Well, we're waiting....

by drummer on Oct 2, 2009 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You lost me now

I’ve sai
d the offensive line has been a problem for years, this isn’t a discovery.

I’m not seeing any evidence suggesting the offense was better under Martz

by bignerd on Oct 2, 2009 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As opposed to 2006?...

Getting it now?

Well, we're waiting....

by drummer on Oct 2, 2009 3:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Check that..

2007, where they were the last ranked offense in the League.

Well, we're waiting....

by drummer on Oct 2, 2009 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And Raye’s offensive efficiency so far is just as good as Martz with the added benefit of less turnovers and more time of possession.

by bignerd on Oct 2, 2009 4:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You got that..

After 3 games? Cool!

Small sample size FTW!!

Well, we're waiting....

by drummer on Oct 2, 2009 4:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ok Drummer,

It works both ways. There is no evidence suggesting he is worse.

I don’t think a larger sample size is going to change the verdict. I think even after 3 weeks it’s a safe bet to say the 49ers offense is still 5th worst in league like last year.

by bignerd on Oct 2, 2009 5:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, the point is in all of this..

Is that continuity would benefit, being that having an OC for 2 seasons straight is good.

Like say, knowing an offense for the second straight year.

Players improving in that offense.

Having an answer @ QB before camp starts.

And yadda yadda yadda.

Look, this is what we expected from Raye and the offense the first few games.

What we didn’t hope for is for the WRs to disappear, as opposed to last season, when we thought they could be players.

Well, we're waiting....

by drummer on Oct 2, 2009 5:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Only 3 games into the season

I think it’s a great question to ask, but a little too soon, don’t you think? I’m anxious to see what the fans will think should you bring this poll up again after week 9.

Personally, I think it’ll take a while for Jimmy Raye to understand what he truly has in Shaun Hill, and that is: a quarterback who knows how NOT to make mistakes at crucial times and, thus, is a great game manager; a quarterback whose primary strength is in making those short, intermediate passes and is taking what the defense gives him; and lastly, a quarterback who is mentally tough and has the ability to rise to the occasion and make plays when needed (Raye should look at the plays he made in wk 1 and 3).

I admit that I too have been frustrated by Coach Rayes play-calling. Headscratchers, I call them. But I think in the coming weeks, we’ll see Raye and Coach Sing open up the playbook for Hill, and give him the opportunity to make some plays. I could be really wrong, but I hope I’m right.

Hey Fooch, I love the work you put out on Ninersnation. I think you do a wonderful job. Think maybe you can start a similar poll, only instead of Jimmy Raye, put Shaun Hill? I’ve been one of his most staunchest supporters, and I’d love to see what fans think. Even with the loss this past weekend, I don’t think any fan out there can deny that this guy is pretty good. His numbers aren’t great, but man! He comes up big when you need him to doesn’t he?

by Waiting4JoshMorgan on Oct 1, 2009 7:53 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

If not for Favre

the 49ers would have won that game, and it would have been because of Hill’s arm. For those against Hill, I kindly ask: If the 49ers won, would you still ignore that and say something like, "the ‘team’ won the game, not Hill?

by Waiting4JoshMorgan on Oct 1, 2009 7:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

W4JM

I agree with everything you say (with regards to Shaun Hill).

HIll is one of the most effecient QB’s I’ve ever seen. I think that Raye & Sing WILL start putting the ball in his hands more often at crunch time.

by GeoMak on Oct 1, 2009 9:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hill poll

I might do that at some point. I’m thinking for now I’ll do that at the quarter marks (after 4 games, 8 games, 12 games and 16 games).

by Fooch on Oct 2, 2009 10:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

and thanks for the compliment

I’m really excited about the general direction this site (and the network as a whole) is heading. We’re getting a lot more folks participating in the discussions which I love.

by Fooch on Oct 2, 2009 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

On the fence, but no

I struggle with my opinion on Raye. I think they are playing correctly by running the ball more than 50% of the time. This should be the strength of the 49ers.

My issue is the lack of creativity in the run game. Every week, we get blitzed up the middle because there is no threat of an outside run game. If they would mix up the run plays and call something other than runs between the tackles, I believe they would do much better in the run game.

I think they should focus on inside the tackles, that is Gore’s strength. But if they never rush against the edge, the 8 in the box will always be between the tackles with Gore.

by jkbeers on Oct 1, 2009 9:38 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

jkbeers

They have run:

45%
52%
51%

Two out of those three games were in two of the loudest domes in the NFL.

I think, as time goes on, the offense will ‘open up,’ both in the running and passing game.

by GeoMak on Oct 1, 2009 9:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As pointed out above, they do try to run outside but the plays are always getting blown up in the backfield. When the RB gets tackled immediately after a hand off it looks like another up the middle.

by bignerd on Oct 1, 2009 10:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

hmmm...

I agree about the lack of creativity in the run game as I only saw a few ‘quick’ outside-the-box-tosses to Frank in the game against Seattle. But I think the real problem really has been that Coach Raye hasn’t been creative with his play calling, PERIOD. Unfortunately, in the 3 games that I’ve seen, Coach Raye seems to be a bit stubborn. His unwillingness to adjust to what the defenses are showing is amazingly ridiculous. You would expect more screen and slant plays everytime the other team brings in 2-3 guys to blitz, but that hasn’t been the case at all.

However! With that said, it’s only been 3 weeks, and I think Coach Raye and Coach Sing are wanting to play it conservatively just to see how the team can do by just running the ball and keeping things as simple as possible. I don’t know much about Coach Raye, but I’m willing to grab onto my nuts and say that I don’t think he’s THAT incompetent (even though he looks the part). He’ll make adjustments, I’m sure, but only when he gains trust in Hill. And trust, I think, is key here…

by Waiting4JoshMorgan on Oct 1, 2009 10:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My concern isn’t with the pass/run ratio. Also, I think the passing game has done well so far.

My only concern is the running plays they are calling. I didn’t keep track, but I only remember a couple of the run plays called that were designed to be runs outside of the tackles. That is where my issue is.

No matter what run/pass plays the 49ers call, I would expect 8-9 guys in the box every week. What jumps out at me is how the 8 guys in the box react. When they 49ers snap the ball, the defense is consistantly crashing between the tackles. My opinion is if the 49ers take 15-20% of those run plays and stretch them outside the tackles, it would keep the defense honest on the run game. I think this would slow down some of the blitzes and keep the defense on its heels.

Other than that, I think the offense is showing good promise and will continue to improve efvery week. Besides, with the defense the 49ers have, they will be competing every week!!!

by jkbeers on Oct 1, 2009 9:59 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

No

It’s not really hard to run the same handful of plays over and over again, despite some of them being horribly ineffective. We would be better off getting one of the gamers from Madden Nation to call our plays. LOL

by niners84 on Oct 1, 2009 10:09 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

what? no window love for jimmy raye?

even though we had 2 offensive passing TDs set up by our commit to the run?
spare me the stats fellow faithful, but i dont think shaun hill (or the homie j. raye) had anything to do with the sorry effort on the Harvin kickoff return, or the you-know-who miracle play at the end.

We, the team, played really well. keep up the power run. smash those ugly dudes.

NINERS 4 LIFE

by LADubbz45 on Oct 1, 2009 11:02 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I voted no

but I do think Raye will finally open up the pass game this week. Especially with Gore out. Hill has proven he can move the ball down field. But we can’t have a power running game if the opposition know we are going to run it up the gut.. Mix it up and open up the running game.
I liked how we opened up the Vikes game with 3(?) passes. Even if they weren’t successful, it was unexpected. We need more unpredictability.

by mountaindew77 on Oct 1, 2009 11:39 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I voted yes

Because it’s been three games and he knows better than any of us what his squads limitations are. When Hill is sacked, it’s easy to understand why Raye would prefer to run the ball. When the run is stiffed it’s easy to wonder why we aren’t throwing the ball. Raye understands this is a work in progress. He also understands that being a top running team does not mean every rush is successful and that the hidden benefits of this philosophy (fewer turnovers, more TOP, wearing down the defense) aren’t often noted in game analysis. Yes, I’d like more mixture in formations (3 wide), variety (outside runs, throw on 1st down) and trust in the QB when leading in the 4th quarter. I also look forward to seeing Jones and Hill get time at WR.

I’d like to at least get to the bye week before making strong opinions and see where we improve and how we respond to the two road dome games after the bye

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 2, 2009 1:52 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I voted No

However,

I am really happy about what is going, but I want a little more panache! Just a little though.

by TheNiner on Oct 2, 2009 1:22 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The only blog that enjoys VD *and* Crabs!
Start posting about the 49ers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

RedZone Moments from SB Nation

Mile High Report
Comcast Redzone Report - Behind the losing streak
The Phinsider
Dolphins in the red zone: Week 11

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dave_small
Official Updated NN Offseason Discussion Thread
Italian_flag_small
Still think the Niners will reach the playoffs???
Dave_small
Week 11 Prediction Games
Howtheyscoredcat_small
Official Alex Smith [Over]Reaction Thread: Bears Edition
Small
Alex Smith vs Aaron Rodgers(updated)

Recent FanPosts

Small
missing the walsh days
T200_1517_1__small
Alex Smith and the Shotgun Spread
Small
sacks sacks sacks
Dave_small
Week 12 Prediction Games
Howtheyscoredcat_small
Week 11 Prediction Games: The Results That Go to 11
49ers_small
My Playoff Tree(did this last year as well), and accolades
49ers_header_banner_small
Jeckyll and Hyde
South_park_avatar_small
Better Know The Jacksonville Jaguars: Ask Big Cat Country
Small
Packers 30--Niners 24 Week 10 play by play
Images_small
Yorks and the Snyders Go away

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Turf Show Times
'Tis the Season for Null
Pride Of Detroit
Matthew Stafford, Calvin Johnson Miss Practice
Big Cat Country
BCC RADIO IN 10 MINUTES

SPONSORS


Head Ball Coach

Dave_small Fooch

Editors

Jerry_rice_small ProfessorBigelow

Assistant Coaches

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

Pixies_logo_small Florida Danny

M_12a62905a0324d2da2f43ddaf62c630f_small Ninjames

Duct_tape_bandit_small Josh from Hollywood

Crab_tree_small briandean

Moderators

Jackalope_card_small wjackalope