The San Francisco 49ers LOLffensive LOLine: Lamentations and solutions
I mentioned last week that we'd hold off quarterly reviews until this week since the team has a bye and it's close enough to the quarter point. Things changed rather dramatically with the on-field product, and even for those who view it as just one game, it's still a very tough pill to swallow. Nonetheless we will power through with a first quarter review of the 2009 San Francisco 49ers.
I think it's safe to say the biggest issue at this point for the team is the offensive line. That's one reason we're referring to it as the LOLffensive LOLine (LOL for short - thanks to Florida Danny and others for rolling that one out, and I think we can stick with that as our OL's nickname). There are obviously plenty of other concerns, particularly on the offensive side of the ball. However, an improved offensive line would likely help mitigate some of these problems. The 49ers may not have the best QB in the world, but how good can he be when he's only getting a second to make decisions on passing plays? Glen Coffee may be struggling as a rookie, but without holes it's hard to gain confidence on an every down basis. Again, the offensive line is not the only problem on this team, but I would argue it is the biggest problem.
Over the course of the season we've had a variety of comments about the o-line ranging from we're screwed because of bad drafting to bench Chilo to fire OL coach Chris Foerster. In today's Mike Singletary approval rating thread a few folks were discussing the issue in terms of who should be on the line and who should be benched. What I wanted to do at this point was bring all the discussion into a single thread so we can sort through the mass of ideas out there.
In the Singletary thread, Florida Danny pointed to a pair of plays (check out the comment here) that I pulled up on my DVR. The first one is a rush play (11:08 left in the first quarter) and as Danny points out, Rachal ends the play blocking nobody and falling face first. The linebacker comes through untouched and stops Coffee. I was listening just after the play and Tony Siragusa talks about how it was such a great play by Atlanta considering they were rolling 5 DBs and had six men in the box. They certainly took advantage of the situation, but I'd say the 49ers provided them a great opportunity with the poor blocking.
The second play Danny pointed out was the pass play with 14:18 left in the second quarter. The offensive line issues came into play because Rachal let through the nickel linebacker. Hill got the throw off but the trajectory was definitely messed up by the blitzing LB. As Danny pointed out, Pashos went to defend the defensive end and released the LB for Rachal to block. Rachal instead decided to move up and to his left, once again guarding nobody as the LB burst through. If you get a chance to review the game tape, I strongly encourage you to check these two plays out.
In his press conference yesterday, Mike Singletary was asked if right guard was his biggest concern and he said: "Quite possible. Quite possible." Singletary explained the lack of preparation, but in the end the players also have to execute. Chilo Rachal has struggled in his execution this year. Does that mean it's time to go with Tony Wragge at right guard? Wragge is no superstar, but he has proven himself to be a solid competitor, which this offensive line just might need.
We continue on after the jump...
While the line as a whole is struggling, the second main issue with it is at right tackle. The team has bounced between Adam Snyder and Tony Pashos and does not seem to be any closer to a resolution of the matter. In previous press conferences Mike Singletary indicated that Adam Snyder had pulled ahead in the position battle. Then this Sunday he went down with a left thigh contusion. We don't have an update on his injury yet, so I'm not really sure what the immediate future holds at right tackle. Should the team stick with Pashos at right tackle? Someone suggested moving Barry Sims there, but I personally think Pashos deserves a complete game (or more) of action at right tackle before the team considers something drastic like letting Barry Sims on the field of play.
The other potential change is of course to fire Chris Foerster. In most any sports, but particularly in baseball and football, when a team is struggling in a particular area of the game, that particular assistant coach is often the one who gets canned. When a baseball team isn't hitting, adios batting coach. Chris Foerster was actually a beneficiary of such a change last October. Mike Nolan fired OL coach George Walthrop and promoted Chris Foerster in his place. Of course, that transaction occurred the same day as the team fired Mike Nolan and promoted Mike Singletary. So it's hard to assess the returns through the end of 2008.
So given that the team has some limited roster options (basically Wragge), is there any reason to think a new offensive line coach could make much of a difference for this line? Would they be able to better prepare the individuals on the line and put them in a position to succeed? Or is the OL in a position to succeed, but they're just not executing? Or maybe it's a combination of both. Either way, something needs to be done.
0 recs |
122 comments
|
Comments
question
Rachal ends the play blocking nobody and falling face first
is this a perfect analogy of his overall play? falling face first?
that kind of reminds me of cam cameron circa preseason 2007 with the soon-to-be 1-15 fins.
maybe rachal is just trying to fail forward fast by falling face first?
by Florida Danny on Oct 13, 2009 12:15 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Foerster needs to go regardless of what we do with player personnel
http://www.behindthesteelcurtain.com/2008/12/11/689453/a-closer-look-at-the-balti
Finally, it’s worth noting that the Baltimore Ravens changed offensive line coaches. Gone is Chris Foerster, who served as the team’s offensive line coach since 2005. The Ravens line was miserable in ’05, better in ’06, and not very good in ’07. In 2004, his last year in Miami, his line surrendered the second most sacks in the league (52) and tied for last in yards per rush (3.5). Foerster was hired by San Francisco this year, and I suppose it should surprise no one that the 49ers are 25th in rushing yards, and 3rd worst in sacks allowed (45).
Also I feel you neglected to mention that Baas has been a weak spot at LG as well, which imo is a critical issue because having such weak guard play hurts Heitmann as well, because I’ve seen a few plays this year where he was too indecisive with double teaming, which I feel is a direct consequence of sucky play on both sides of him.
Our options are limited but I would go with:
Staley – Wragge – Heitmann – Snyder – Pashos
Staley and Pashos have proven durability so I don’t think tackle depth is too much of a concern. Wragge has filled in nicely before, and Snyder has always been more suited to playing guard.
by znk916 on Oct 13, 2009 12:15 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I mentioned in another post that the Niners need someone like McKittrick.
He had a way of teaching the OL and they all performed for him. The Niners need to find someone, fast, who can work with the OL. I really don’t think Rachal is bad… I think that the entire OL is not in sync with what Forrest Gump, er … Foerster is trying to make them do.
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
by Eastbayjim on Oct 13, 2009 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can we get a psychic to channel McKittrick?
A seance would be even better.
by jviet on Oct 13, 2009 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It could work... the cops use psychics to help solve crimes.. and our OL is a crime...so let them solve this one
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
by Eastbayjim on Oct 13, 2009 3:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That would be the best we could do for know
by 49erSalvatrucha on Oct 13, 2009 12:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would love it if they
went with that…we may actually have2 or 3 seconds instead of 1 or less on any given pass play. And Gore actually may see creases he can work with.
Good job… You should put in your application for Foersters job. J/k… I know he doesn’t make the personel changes. I like the idea though. Not sure they would come out of the gates with that many changes though. It’s possible but I suspect the only change would be Chilo…unfortunately
by Drew K on Oct 13, 2009 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
good find...
i never realized he had that bad of a track record…here it is in a little more detail using FO’s adjusted line yards (ALY) and adjusted sack rate (ASR) stats:
1996 (TB) — ALY = 3.51 YPC (30th out of 30 teams); ASR = 6.0% (11th)
1997 (TB) — ALY = 4.04 (17th); ASR = 7.7% (18th)
1998 (TB) — ALY = 4.18 (6th); ASR = 6.3% (9th)
1999 (TB) — ALY = 3.99 (29th out of 31 teams); ASR = 8.4% (22nd)
2000 (TB) — ALY = 4.00 (17th); ASR = 8.9% (25th)
2001 (TB) — ALY = 3.57 (29th); ASR = 7.4% (18th)
2005 (BAL) — ALY = 3.60 (29th out of 32 teams); ASR = 7.4% (20th)
2006 (BAL) — ALY = 4.13 (20th); ASR = 3.7% (2nd)
2007 (BAL) — ALY = 3.77 (27th); ASR = 7.6% (22nd)
career average — ALY = 3.87 (23rd); ASR = 7.0% (16th)
so, all in all, his OLs have been pretty bad at run-blocking and middle-of-the-road at pass blocking. in terms of run-blocking, he’s coached 1 top-8 OL and 5 bottom-8 OLs during his 9 seasons as OL coach. in pass-blocking, he’s coached 1 top-8 OL and 1 bottom-8 OL.
however, this season the 49ers OL is underperforming Foerster’s career average ALY by 1.01 YPC (they’re 31st), and underperforming his career average ASR by 3.7% (they’re 30th). so i’d say that previous teams haven’t shown foerster to be a good OL coach, but the 49ers OL is so bad this year that the problem can’t just be foerster. it looks like a situation where a bad coach is being expected to work miracles with a horrible OL.
it kind of makes you wonder, though, why singletary would hire a coach with a bad history of run-blocking OLs when he wants to be a dominant running team. seems to me he’d want to hire an OL coach with a track record of good run-blocking OLs. perhaps it’s a supply and demand thing? foerster was the best available from a sorry bunch, maybe? if that’s the case, who would singletary be able to hire to replace him that fits the “good run-blocking OLs” criterion?
by Florida Danny on Oct 13, 2009 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions 3 recs
Nolan hired Foerster not Sing.
I wonder if Coach Sing reads Ninersnation and this post…..
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
by Eastbayjim on Oct 13, 2009 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe someone should forward this to Maiocco
He could put Singletary on the spot and ask him about Forester’s bad track record.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by chikmagnet_565 on Oct 13, 2009 1:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Grass roots movement for real
I already hit up Sando covering the NFC West for ESPN with the link I posted, someone get all our beat writers this info too lol.
by znk916 on Oct 13, 2009 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
oops...
…yeah, should have known it was nolan’s fault. ;-)
by Florida Danny on Oct 13, 2009 1:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wonder if Shanahan can help find a OL coach for us... as he always had good OLs.
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
by Eastbayjim on Oct 13, 2009 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Denver has one of the best O-lines in the NFL right now
and Shanahan built that line.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by chikmagnet_565 on Oct 13, 2009 1:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ironically Shanahan subscribes to the complete opposite philosophy. He’ll overlook a smaller offensive lineman if he has quick feet because he thinks he’ll just out maneuver defenders in space.
by bignerd on Oct 13, 2009 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shanahan and Denver uses
a zone blocking scheme which requires quick, athletic linemen. Shanahan learned it from who else??? Bill Walsh, because zone-blocking was what Walsh and Mckittrick used back in the ’80’s. Zone blocking also utilizes cut-blocks which are legal, but D-line hate that because the lineman usually aim for their knees. Ask Howie Long about that…he hated McKittrick.
IMO, we have the opposite system here.
by jviet on Oct 13, 2009 2:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was just about to say something...
… about that: Denver’s offensive line is perceived by many to play “dirty.”
In all seriousness, I think the 49ers definitely play a different style than zone-blocking. I think the coaching staff since Nolan took over has been pushing for bigger guys who can win the 1-on-1 battle in front of him, rather than being able to be more flexible.
by sfgfan on Oct 13, 2009 3:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s just too bad they can’t get in front of the defender for a 1-on-1 battle.
by bignerd on Oct 13, 2009 3:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought the OL coach Gibbs built it?
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Oct 13, 2009 3:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Foerster
Nolan hired Foerster to be the assistant OL coach. He was promoted amidst the Nolan firing but no word on whether Singletary wanted it to happen or if that was a McCloughan decision.
by Fooch on Oct 13, 2009 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ol coach, DB coach, WR coach
Sing needs to clean house, I would try to get lott and rice to see if they wat to be apart of bringin us back to greatness.
"Optimist Prime"
Come along and ride the muthaship!
by rlott#42 on Oct 13, 2009 5:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You want to bring Lott in as a coach?
Color me surprised.
by Fearless Frog on Oct 13, 2009 10:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
We’ll in that case the o line coach should go then.
by 49erSalvatrucha on Oct 13, 2009 12:39 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
the line coach has to go...
did you see how the dolpis used a moving line? how come we’re not doing that? how come we’re not using play action roll outs with a dump off to the tight end?
"Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are"
by Bo$$Ixta! on Oct 13, 2009 12:47 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Because we don't have Parcells
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by chikmagnet_565 on Oct 13, 2009 1:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because they hired Callahan
Did you hear Gruden talk up how good a position coach he was? Too bad we didn’t make that hire.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Oct 13, 2009 3:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That was so sick the jets were so confused when they blitzed. It was a wall of orange man I wish our line was like that.
by 49erSalvatrucha on Oct 13, 2009 12:58 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Chilo Rachal
has had enought time to get it together. I think that Singletary has been more than patient with him.
I was watching Sound Fx after the Rams game and Sing was all over Rachal all game. And that was against the RAMS. He was saying things to the effect of, “if you gonna play like Chilo, we’ll get someone who wants to be in there…. these guys are workin their tales off.” etc. (speaking on the rest of the line). It was curious though, because as he said that, he pointed in the direction of Baas. I think there had to be the other linemen were sitting by Baas and it was just a bad camera angle tho.
by Drew K on Oct 13, 2009 1:25 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Really?
You’re saying a OG that hasn’t even had 16 games under his belt has “had enough time”?
by sfgfan on Oct 13, 2009 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, time to sit
He’s making too many mistakes. Put him back on the bench. Doesn’t mean the team needs to give up on him but means he’s just not ready to play.
by bignerd on Oct 13, 2009 2:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
That was my mistake. For some reasons I read his comment with the idea that he wanted to give up on Rachal, when he really said no such thing.
My fault Drew.
by sfgfan on Oct 13, 2009 2:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's just making too many mental errors
Maybe he’ll be better later but we need someone else in their if we want to have a shot at anything this year. He’s been getting beat like he stole something all 5 games.
by Drew K on Oct 13, 2009 4:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hope
Scotty Mc makes a move before the trade deadline for someone. If we could get a solid OL guy for a 2nd pick or so, I would not be opposed
by Drew K on Oct 13, 2009 1:32 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Hope
Scotty stops drafting fat and slow linemen
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by chikmagnet_565 on Oct 13, 2009 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The OL in the 80s was smaller but quicker
Maybe that is part of the answer… but also need to get a OL coach who knows what they are doing.
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
by Eastbayjim on Oct 13, 2009 1:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hello????????/
Did you forget about the 2nd round draft pick Phil Loadholt, the starting right tackle in Minnesota???
He could have been a Niner.
You can thank Mc Boo Foo for having to chase his tail and find another band aid to put on a gushing wound!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11.
by Italia1970 on Oct 13, 2009 3:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
For some reason, I chuckle every time you say 'Mc Boo Foo'
"I wish the Seahawks were back in the AFCW so we didn’t have to face Willis and Gore twice a year."
by Fearless Frog on Oct 13, 2009 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yea you can chuckle
But the name fits for sure with all his moves screwin the team over and over.
by Italia1970 on Oct 13, 2009 4:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I chuckle every time you chime in and post!
"Optimist Prime"
Come along and ride the muthaship!
by rlott#42 on Oct 13, 2009 5:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is it the cook or the person buying the groceries?
Since 2006 season, the 49ers brass has had to fully rebuild this offensive line and results have been putrid.
The 49ers essentially turned to the Raven’s blueprint of an offensive line. That was probably their first mistake because the Ravens spent the better part of the decade with a horrible offensive line. Essentially their philosophy calls for big, bulky offensive linemen who you can overlook having slow feet. This type of line should be a powerful, straight ahead run blocking unit but be so-so in pass protection. At least that is suppose to be theory. The Ravens couldn’t even block worth a {site decorum} the year they won the SB.
The teams invested a large number of high draft picks in the offensive line: Staley (1st Round), Baas (2nd, #33 pick so 1st round according to Brendan’s math), Rachal (2nd), Snyder (3rd) and Cody Wallace (4th). Although they are young, they should show signs of being an above average offensive line. Other teams are getting far better play from undrafted free agent lineman. For the most part this unit isn’t even showing hints of talent, which according to their draft slots they should possess.
After Sunday, it’s easy to say this unit really is close to the worst offensive line in the league. They are built to push teams around and they got whipped by an incredibly small Falcon defensive front playing nickel coverage! The very type of team they are constructed to crush, and Falcons even took a defender out of the box.
When the results are this bad it’s time to re-evaluate everything. It’s either management and their philosophy of evaluating and finding talent or it’s the coach who cannot get it out them.
Thanks to znk916 research we might have the answer. We brought over the Raven’s bad coach with the bad Raven’s philosophy. Possibly both need to go. At the very least, hire a high priced consultant to bring some new ideas about offensive line play into the organization. 3 years and this experiment is still and utter and complete failure. Huge investment and very little return.
As for the immediate fixes I also agree with znk916. Promote Wragge just because the guard play has been so bad it’s common sense to make a switch. Move Snyder back to guard. He’s actually improved each week at RT but he’s probably needed more at guard at this point. Switching Pathos for Snyder at RT probably won’t make much of a difference. I’m already yearning for the days of the 2008 season where the RT was turnstile but at least the offensive line could occasionally open some holes in the run game.
by bignerd on Oct 13, 2009 1:32 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
How about that one guy that Dallas was going to hire as a consultant?
I forget his name.
We interviewed him as a potential OC but Dallas offered him another position.
Eventually the deal fell through though.
We need a Bill Parcells…
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by chikmagnet_565 on Oct 13, 2009 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Parcell's figured out Justin Smiley was the worth the price
Than again Smiley had this ongoing feud with Nolan.
by bignerd on Oct 13, 2009 1:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's why we are in the position we're in. he was or best lineman when he left.
"Optimist Prime"
Come along and ride the muthaship!
by rlott#42 on Oct 13, 2009 5:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
photo
I was hoping somebody would enjoy the photo. I did a google images search of LOL and that’s the best I could come up with.
by Fooch on Oct 13, 2009 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
My quarterly review? It feels like 1980 all over again....
A lot of people on this board are probably too young to remember it, but this season so far is giving me flashbacks to 1980—that is, the season BEFORE we got good. That year, too, we started with a bang, 3-0, and the team came out of nowhere to become a league darling in the early going. After years of playing punching bag, the Niners had a (relatively) new rich-kid owner, and an ambitious, control-freak second-year coach, and a blue-collar quarterback (Steve DeBerg) who managed to consistently play over his head and win ballgames, even if nobody knew exactly how. Then reality set in, most clearly with a 59-14 by the Cowboys in Week 6 that was part of a gruesome 8-game slide. Let me tell you, that Cowboys game was eye-opening (or groin-kicking) in the same way the Falcons game was on Sunday. Let’s just hope next year is 1981 all over again. My question: who’s our new Joe Montana?
by Sweet16 on Oct 13, 2009 2:32 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Key difference..
Walsh built an offense, and he also knew defense. Plus he also built the Organization.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Oct 13, 2009 2:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
True, Jimmy Raye is no Bill Walsh
It’s far from a perfect analogy. This is just how I feel as a fan now: long-term optimistic, but ready for more ugly reality checks this year.
by Sweet16 on Oct 13, 2009 3:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That team had no secondary
Thus the 59 points at Dallas followed by drafting Lott and Wright. They did move the ball though and were in their second year under Walsh. I’ll go with this if we figure the defense and offense from those seasons are reversed. But I see us finishing better than 6-10.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Oct 13, 2009 3:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And this team has no line
Which will be followed by drafting… I agree with better than 6-10 too.
You have been DFiBrillated.
by Dubs fan in Boston on Oct 14, 2009 10:39 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Picked up a DL kaliff mitchel, again. but we are turning him into a OT
Fooch could we get a update on the full PS??? i can’t find one that is up to date.
by whitemike1644 on Oct 13, 2009 2:37 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
sorry about that...
I’ll get working on that at some point today.
by Fooch on Oct 14, 2009 3:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Start Alex Smith!!
For the love of god. Start Alex Smith! Like Hill is going to take the Niners to the playoffs?? WTF?
by utah pens fan on Oct 13, 2009 3:30 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
sarcasm? or serious
because last time alex smith was behind a bad O line he sucked just as bad except he threw more picks…
i can handle incomplete passes i can’t stand INT’s
by whitemike1644 on Oct 13, 2009 3:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know how much more I can take
I’m just waiting for a guy named StanfordGrad84 to publish a fan post saying we need to bring back Kwame.
by bignerd on Oct 13, 2009 3:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
yea
that highlight reel or lowlight reel was probably the worst/funniest thing i ever saw. i really think i could have done a better job.
i would have gotten run over but hey takes longer to push someone down then just go right by them.
by whitemike1644 on Oct 13, 2009 3:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Start Alex Smith at RG ? Wow.. he is a gamer
I was thinking Alex Smith would be better as a DB the way he ran down that player in the preseason.
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
by Eastbayjim on Oct 13, 2009 3:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Miss
Where is Bob McKittrick when we really need him?? He was the last really good offensive line coach we have had..We now realize how important and great McKittrick was..
by The Sear on Oct 13, 2009 3:41 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
McKittrick was a miracle worker
He did more with less than any other offensive line coach in history. He always had his players prepared. They looked up to him like a father figure. He just got every ounce of talent out of every player! Man, it sure would be great to have a talent like that to come help our team right now. As for now, it might be some serious changes in the offensive line. I dont think that is a surprise to anyone that has watched the last 5 games (or 3 years for that matter). Not sure what they are gonna do, but I personally think that they need to trade for a talented backup on a team that has great linemen. Their backups probably blow away our starting 5. We need RT for sure and rt guard isn’t playing well either. If you want to run the ball, you cant let penetration by the defense to hit the QB faster than he can get the ball to the running back.. Thank Goodness for the BYE week… WE needed it bad! GI NNERS !!
Another year, another chance to hope for the team !!
by FaStRmAn on Oct 14, 2009 1:33 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
oops I mean GO NINERS.. Sheet it is late :-)
Another year, another chance to hope for the team !!
by FaStRmAn on Oct 14, 2009 1:34 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bad Drafting
This is of course the issue with terrible drafting done by this regime and the one before..We have spent enough high draft picks in the last six years to have an excellent line and other than Heitmann(low pick), none of these guys has lived up to their draft status..
Until this franchise starts to draft a lot better, this mediocrity will continue..
by The Sear on Oct 13, 2009 3:45 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Staley was a good pick
But the rest have stunk
Don't trust this guy. He lies.
by urnext on Oct 13, 2009 3:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thank Mc Boo Foo
If they take him about back and shoot him, he is still ahead!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Italia1970 on Oct 13, 2009 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey I'm with you
We could have drafted OHER at #10, Crabtree hasn’t played anyway.
"Optimist Prime"
Come along and ride the muthaship!
by rlott#42 on Oct 13, 2009 5:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's always easier to say what they should have done after the fact
Considering how Oher has played and the contract disputes Crabtree had, it’s easy to say they should have taken Oher. However, at the time of the draft, Crabtree made the most sense. I don’t remember reading many posts saying the 49ers should have taken Oher over Crabtree at the time of the draft. And Crabtree may still prove he was a great pick.
Don't trust this guy. He lies.
by urnext on Oct 13, 2009 11:35 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Rec'd for common sense
Hindsight is 20/20. Woulda coulda shoulda… It dont matter now. They need to address the right side or our oline or this year will be a bust. Rachel isnt ready to play NFL football. He’s too green. They need to either trade picks for an olineman, bring Boone back and start Wragge, sending Chilo to the PS, or move players around on the oline to see if you can get the right combo of players and make a decent front 5. I think Singletary will address this problem before the bye week is up.
Another year, another chance to hope for the team !!
by FaStRmAn on Oct 14, 2009 12:30 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not Hindsight
Singletary said he wanted to play “fysical”. He said he wanted to concentrate on the running game and dominating both lines of scrimmage. So why would the team target a WR when the most powerful but raw OT in the draft is sitting on the board at the team’s weakest position?
I think you are misinterpreting our angst with the selection. Our complaint isn’t about the post draft performances or talent level, it’s about the team’s stated philosophy and how they failed to follow it on draft day.
by bignerd on Oct 14, 2009 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Crabtree was the highest rated player on the board by a long shot.
The 49ers couldn’t pass him up. I agree with you that I would also have liked them to get Oher but they got a potential (possible) franchise WR.
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
by Eastbayjim on Oct 14, 2009 9:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe the 49ers should use both of their 1st round picks on the Oline
Then again, they’ve used several high picks on the Oline and only Staley has worked out. Either they stink at evaluating OL or they stink at developing the talent. Maybe both.
Don't trust this guy. He lies.
by urnext on Oct 13, 2009 3:45 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Quite possibly both
McGM has not shown that he really gets what makes a lineman good.
by jviet on Oct 13, 2009 6:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sweet
Good post, but there will never be another Montana..Lets hope Nate Davis is as good enough to make us competitive with the top teams..
by The Sear on Oct 13, 2009 3:47 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Staley
Do you think Staley was worth the tenth pick in the draft?? That is what we gave New England to draft him..He is ok, but not close to worth the number 10 pick..
by The Sear on Oct 13, 2009 3:48 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes
A legitimate, starting LT is worth any #10 pick.
by bignerd on Oct 13, 2009 3:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's still my opinion
If you don’t think Staley was worth it I would understand.
What would really blow your noodle is if we didn’t trade for Staley the 49ers might have been drafting in the Top 5 in 2008.
by bignerd on Oct 13, 2009 4:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And could have taken...
Matt Ryan? Humm…
You have been DFiBrillated.
by Dubs fan in Boston on Oct 14, 2009 10:42 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's sorta what I was hinting
Nolan would have made the pick so the odds of the team admitting a mistake and drafting Ryan would have been zero. Even if he did draft Ryan, I couldn’t imagine our offensive line without Staley. There would be four turnstiles instead of three. Ryan’s shoulder might already be broken playing for the 49ers.
by bignerd on Oct 14, 2009 1:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually the pick ended up as the 7th
New England traded down to the 10th before picking. But hindsight is 20/20. No one thought the 49ers would be as bad as they were that year. In fact, several experts had them as their dark horse for the playoffs. Even SI ran an article on them. But they stunk and New England got the 7th pick. Still, Staley is a great player.
Don't trust this guy. He lies.
by urnext on Oct 13, 2009 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
running game obsession
A rookie running back is featured, but a bunch of good receivers are waiting for the ball, and we have to blame the OL? Silly. Why not focus on winning instead?
by Vertigo on Oct 13, 2009 3:57 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
because only 3 of our 7 WR’s have catches.
by whitemike1644 on Oct 13, 2009 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Should be more
The problem is that Hill doesn’t get a lot of time to pass so he ends up dumping it to his check down receivers, RB and TE. I’m sure the WR’s would have more catches if Hill had time to run through his progression.
Don't trust this guy. He lies.
by urnext on Oct 13, 2009 4:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Most of the time
even when he does have time to go through his reads, the guys are blanketed. WR’s that is.
by Drew K on Oct 13, 2009 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not so sure
Since I watch the games on TV and not at the stadium, there’s no way for me to know if the other WR’s are open. The TV doesn’t show what’s going on with every receiver.
Don't trust this guy. He lies.
by urnext on Oct 13, 2009 11:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
okay, adjust
I’m a Hill fan, if not fanatic, but try Smith then. Stop focusing on the personnel and focus on the coaching plan. Rachel, Snyder, Bass, whatever. The GM didn’t deliver when it came to the obvious need of the OL. Remember that Pittsburgh guy … Smith? But don’t dump the season because of the “upstairs” folly. (Shhh,. somebody might hear): this is a passing team, not a running team. The guy behind Coffee was a QB. We have a zillion receivers. Get the ball away from the OL that is causing all the grief, don’t push it into the problem. Perhaps the QBs are the ones with the clue. Hill will have more time if they decide to give it to him.
by Vertigo on Oct 13, 2009 4:30 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
"We have a zillion receivers."
Yes, but none of them are getting open.
"I wish the Seahawks were back in the AFCW so we didn’t have to face Willis and Gore twice a year."
by Fearless Frog on Oct 13, 2009 4:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Josh Morgan is getting little, if any, separation, and not on a consistent basis.
Isaac Bruce at least knows what to do but his body is failing him, he looks his age a lot more often than he used to. Vernon Davis has been the best pass-catching option so far, a credit to him but telling of the state that the WRs are in.
I’m really excited to see Crabtree play, though.
by Fearless Frog on Oct 13, 2009 10:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And hopefully Morgan will learn to use his body and earn some trust in Hill
If that happens, Hill might just start using him as a bail out knowing that Morgan use his physicality to either catch it or to prevent an interception.
You have been DFiBrillated.
by Dubs fan in Boston on Oct 14, 2009 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
alex barron of the rams is probably available
he has been inconsistent for St Louis, but has played Left and Right Tackle for them.
My solution is to trade with the Rams for Barron, maybe a 4th round draft choice. That is a lot to give up for a Right Tackle in a contract year, but considering what the 49ers have at stake this year, it isn’t a huge overpay.
then tell Pashos and Snyder to lose about 15 pounds each. make them both the starting guards.
NOw you have:
Staley, Snyder, Heitman, Pashos, and Barron.
That line could run block and pass block.
They're called RUNS for a reason.
by connie mack on Oct 13, 2009 5:06 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I dont think the rams would trade in the division
because if we utilized him they would regret it. Who know though. The rams are kind of stupid so they might do it
Go 49ers
by iaalexeeff on Oct 13, 2009 8:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Trust me on this one, Alex Barron really sucks.
There’s a reason Spagnuolo benched his ass despite knowing the bench has suicidally bad players.
by Fearless Frog on Oct 13, 2009 10:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think ordinarily it wouldn't make sense for the Rams
but this year, they suck and blow, and Barron is a free agent at the end of the year, who will probably leave anyway. If the Niners give up a pick, they get something for nothing. Plus, they’ve got a guy they want to play in his position anyway, so it gives them a chance to try him out.
They're called RUNS for a reason.
by connie mack on Oct 13, 2009 9:05 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Well one thing is certain
Chilo Rachel is a turnstile. He is not getting the job done period. I would go so far to say that the Niners might conciser Alex Boone at this point if he is sober and ready to play! Bary Sins should not be taken off the bench for any reason other than the other 5 starters are injured and they are one short on backups to fill out the line. In fact, the fact that Sims was kept and Boone let go to this day just amazes me. Sims is a proven quantity. In fact there is overwhelming evidence for the prosecution to reach the verdict of Accessory to assault the way he pass blocks.
So I ask again, why not Boone? He is on the practice squad right? Just about now he seems like a mean and spirited young man that might be able to hold his own. Rachel as done NOTHING to earn his position and has done NOTHING to try and keep it. Way too many “OLE” blocks that allow free hits on Hill and the running back. I guess you can go with Wragge, but they you need a backup for Wragge. I say bring back Boone and let him compete with Wragge for the RT spot. What do we have to lose… Other than our skill players to injuries?
Is it too late to trade for a RT? The deadline hasnt come yet, so we should be shopping hard for a RT to fill the gaping hole in our Oline. Just a guy who can get in the way and hold his ground for a SECOND would be nice. Put Rachel on the PS, I’m sure he would clear waivers at this point.. They are going to shake up the O-Line, that is for sure. How that is going to play out leaves room for much discussion.
On a side note, I don’t feel like Bly’s apology was sincere. It sounded rehearsed and he was still making excuses even as he was apologizing. I truly hope we do not see any more celebrating when we are down 25 points. That is the sign of a loser club. Act like you have been there before. An 11 year vet should know better. I really hope that Coach was sincere when he said Bly came to him. It doesn’t matter much now that it is over and done with, but I’d like to believe that Bly saw the replays and realized he was being a bonehead all on his own. I was sickened when he got stripped. The only way he could make it worse is if he kept “Neon Derion High Stepping” to the endzone without the ball!!
I have seen a lot of criticism of Hil after that loss. I was critical of Hill after the loss too. But after watching the game again, I have to say for as little time Hill had to work with, he did a pretty good job of not getting sacked or fumbling the ball. Hill has Z E R O time to peddle back and read the defense. The D-Linemen of the Falcons got in the backfield faster than Hill could take his drop! And that is not an allstar D-Line. They got one good pass rusher and the other players are just good. They ran stunts and blitzes that were aimed at the weak spot on the Niner O-line at RT.
I think that Singletary will get them back to playing good ball after the Bye. I REALLY hope that Crabtree becomes a scoring threat to help take the burden off of Gore and Davis. The Niner wide receiving corps just stinks to high H3LL! If Crabtree can even be a fast decoy running go routes, it would help the offense. I believe the RT position will be fixes by the time we play Houston, somehow or someway. We get our offense back and I hope Gore is 110% healthy and ready to rumble, I think Davis, after watching the lowlights film study will be more attentive to the play calls and his role in the offense. If Crabby can draw some attention, that might create some one on one opportunities for other players. Just give Hill a 3 count will ya??? Hill needs a CHANCE to succeed !!! GO NINERS !
Another year, another chance to hope for the team !!
by FaStRmAn on Oct 14, 2009 12:24 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
They ran stunts and blitzes that were aimed at the weak spot on the Niner O-line at RT.
I think this is what Sing was referring to in his post game comments.
You have been DFiBrillated.
by Dubs fan in Boston on Oct 14, 2009 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bary Sins should not be taken off the bench for any reason other than the other 5 starters are injured and they are one short on backups to fill out the line.
Also the team should ask the opponent if they would prefer to count 4 alligators against no blocker prior to putting in Barry Sims
by bignerd on Oct 14, 2009 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't act surprise !
This act has been going on for years. To think that you can move Linemen around and expect Major improvement. Wishful Thinking! I’m Pissed because I wanted OL in the FA Market and wanted to draft 2 Linemen. But NO….. ! Then to top it all off, we lose Sheets to Miami !
Watch out McC, Your Day is coming sooner than I Hope !!!!!!
Those who read my comments, you know I don’t like McC.
by LASVEGASNINER on Oct 14, 2009 5:56 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I understand but the problem isn't the OL players it is in the coaching.
Rachal should be playing a lot better, he was really good at USC.
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
by Eastbayjim on Oct 14, 2009 10:28 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rachal should be playing a lot better, he was really good at USC.
It’s easy to look good against Cal. Sigh…
But seriously, in college, you can get away with just being big, taking the guy in front of you, and pushing him off the ball. In the pros, you have to rely on more than your size. Chilo clearly hasn’t got the mental part of the game down.
You have been DFiBrillated.
by Dubs fan in Boston on Oct 14, 2009 10:49 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
USC ain't the NFL, no matter what Pete Carroll says
Chilo can drive block a guy right in front of him, but doesn’t have the brains or the footwork to handle anything but that.
I’d like to see Keith Fahnhorst or Randy Cross come back and teach these guys how to block. We had one of the great OLs of the generation in the 80’s. Why aren’t we tapping those guys for coaching positions?
by ToddCommish on Oct 14, 2009 10:56 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok.. them have someone Twitter Matt Maicco to have him put that in Sing's ear. Along with Foerster's history.
Hire either Fahnhorst or Cross to be the assistant OL coach..
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
by Eastbayjim on Oct 14, 2009 9:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Raye and Foerster: A match made in...
I love the niners and I love the new ethos, but we’ve matched someone who has a long-term track record as mediocre OC (when you’ve been an OC for years and people point to the fact that you had a great tight end once as your highlight…) with someone who has a long-term track record as a ‘fair to poor’ performing line coach (thanks for the stats Danny) is there any surprise we aren’t a force on the LOL? I think I agree with LVNiner that moving around the guys we have with the same system and same coaching isn’t going to gain us much. How often have you seen new coaches go in with a new system and make guys that looked average before look like all-stars (ala Elvis Dubervil). Make a coaching change now, before its too late!
by NH49er on Oct 14, 2009 12:03 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Chil isn't that bad...last year when he went in
he played really well so something has changed and I’ll speculate that maybe he’s being asked to do things that he’s not confident in doing…maybe with the protection schemes or something. Somehow he is off kilter and I wish I knew how he came off the tracks. However, I do think he is fix-able.
by jviet on Oct 14, 2009 4:12 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Chilo Rachael
Chilo has been getting beat and beaten badly and often. I am surprised they have stuck with him this long. He is getting beat off the ball and pushed back even on running plays. I don’t know what the problem with him is but if it were me I would bring in someone else. Chilo is young and has talent but he isnt ready to be a starter. Many people don;t realize how complicated being an offensive lineman is. You have to know who you are going after and make the right first step everytime. Sounds simple but it isn’t. You have to get off the ball first. Chilo looks like he is bewildered out there and still trying to figure out who he should block when the ball is snapped. The offensive line lost Larry Allen and Justin Smiley at the guard spots. Larry Allen is hall of fame material that retired and Justin Smiley now is starting for the Miami Dolphins after being lost to free agency. Baas has shown signs of improvement, Staley seems stable at left tackle and Heitman is our best offensive lineman. I don’t think the 49ers should give up on Rachal but should drop him down on the depth chart and give someone else a shot at the job.
by Fletchman on Oct 14, 2009 8:40 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
























