Niners Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

Mike Singletary Approval Rating, Week 7

It seems like every week we go into this approval rating, something happens that gives folks pause about Mike Singletary, and something else happens that gives fans further reason to support Singletary.  Coming out of this past weekend, that little equation has gotten a bit harder to even out (or view in a positive light).  Over at ESPN.com, they ran their weekly coaches' ratings and Singletary is down to a career low 84%.  It's impressive that he's been at such a high rating, but given the path of his head coaching career, it's a number that has to be taken in a specific context.

As we look at Sunday's game, Florida Danny had an especially pertinent comment in the recap thread.

point #2 is that this game was nolan-esque from a coaching perspective. all those delays and wasted timeouts were pretty nolan-esque. what’s really a disgrace though is that the performance we saw today was based on two week’s-worth of preparation. how does a team have 2 weeks to prepare for a game, and come out as flat and unprepared as the 49ers did today? again, nolan-esque.

During and immediately after the game, two camps seemed to develop.  There is one that viewed the performance as very much Nolan-esque.  They viewed the delays and wasted timeouts as sitting on the coach's shoulders in the game management aspect of his job.  Danny's own language pointed to the frustrations that developed under Mike Nolan.  At that point folks were quick to jump on Nolan.

The other camp looks at some of the issues as having more to do with Alex Smith's rustiness.  He might be in game shape physically, but he needs some time to get the mental side of the game completely back and going.  I think one of the Texans fans in the recap or game thread was talking about that and I think some folks latched onto that theory.  Does anybody agree on this?  Always fun to be able to mix the QB discussion into every possible thread, right?

So, the team has fallen to .500 and faces a tough stretch of games with a new starting QB.  Do you approve of Mike Singletary's work at this point?  We'll also be back later this week with the Jimmy Raye approval rating.

Poll
Do you approve of the job Mike Singletary is doing as head coach?
Yes
1229 votes
No
145 votes

1374 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 74 comments  |  Add comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

The question really needs to be

Do you approve of the job Singletary did as a head coach the last game?

Because overall I still approve. I like the direction he’s going. I’m glad he’s starting Smith, but I had issues with the time management on the last game.

by smileyman on Oct 27, 2009 8:05 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I approve overall......

…….but I don’t approve his performance last week. He should have pulled Hill sooner and should have found a decent replacement for punt returner.

FIRE BRUCE BOCHY NOW!!!!!!
AND TAKE BRIAN SABEAN WITH HIM!!!!!

by 49er16 on Oct 27, 2009 8:16 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Agreed with both you and smileyman

Matt Cain: He'll save children, but not the Dodger children.
"AT LAST I AM A PARENTS." - Buster

by jponry on Oct 27, 2009 8:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The focus is on the QB situation right now, but...

What the heck is going on with our Defense? I know the Safety situation is hurting but overall we are bleeding badly the last two weeks.

by FiveAlarmFreddy on Oct 27, 2009 8:57 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hard to play well when you're always on the field

They forced punts on 3 of the first 4 Houston drives. They held them to 3 points in the 2nd half. In between the offense was going 3 & out and ST gave them the ball at the 8 yard line. I think that’s the biggest problem with the defense.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 27, 2009 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Spot on chap spot on

"Optimist Prime"
"Child Please" -Ochocinco

by rlott#42 on Oct 27, 2009 2:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

But the defense is the heart and soul of this team. You’re right when the offense was rolling the defense was able to clamp down in the second half. But on a few of the Texans 3rd down conversions the D’s body language looked defeated. I just dont get the feeling they believe they are an elite defense like they were showing early in the year.

by FiveAlarmFreddy on Oct 27, 2009 2:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I never thought they were elits

They’ve got the talent and work ethic to be very good. But we need at least two elite/great players to be considered elite as a unit. We only have Willis. If we could have an elite pass rusher and one more up upgrade at either safety position, we could then be an intimidating, carry the team, legit top 5 defense.

For now, we’re certainly a top 15 defense and with a competent offense that creates some field position and improves its TOP, we can statistically be top 10. But you have to rush the passer better and create more negative yardage plays than we currently do to take that next step.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 28, 2009 12:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Is that the coach or the OC?

I don’t think that was sing, I think it was Smith and Raye together

"Optimist Prime"
"Child Please" -Ochocinco

by rlott#42 on Oct 27, 2009 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I love sing

i dont care what people say…this guy has given us something raider fans would dream of….hope, optimism , and faith. Look niners are in first in a crappy division…but hell look how far the cards made it last year….cant say i like alot of the plays that raye picks and like smiley said time management was a issue but hell u are down 21 points it happens

by Sammallory on Oct 27, 2009 8:17 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

First Place

Now belongs to the cards

Looking to put San Fran*six-o* here some time soon!

by dartdart on Oct 27, 2009 9:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

someone help me out

The niners are 3-0 in division play and should be labeled first right?
Why does it say everywhere that the cards are first? …… is that cause
google and yahoo have not made a program that reads division wins etc or
are the cards in first…wtf?

by Sammallory on Oct 27, 2009 8:31 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

record

49ers are 3-3, Cardinals are 4-2. That’s why they’re in first.

by Fooch on Oct 27, 2009 8:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice, succinct answer.

Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.

by howtheyscored on Oct 27, 2009 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Overall record

is the first determiner in who wins the division. Not like high school…

Looking to put San Fran*six-o* here some time soon!

by dartdart on Oct 27, 2009 9:55 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My issue with Singletary...

is that he seems very weak on the X’s and O’s side of coaching and I do have to agree with the above poster that his game management needs work. Coaching isn’t just about firing up your team.

by ThermoElectro on Oct 27, 2009 8:52 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree. And he still can't make the OL work.

I changed my vote this week to disapprove. Sing is a great motivator and knows defenses, but he is even weaker than Nolan at knowledge and creativity on offense. Opposing teams play the 9ers using the same defensive strategy every single week, stack the line and blitz a lot off the right side, and it continues to work because Sing/Raye have no answers on offense.

But the single biggest issue for the 9ers, the offensive line, remains as bad, or even worse, than it was in Game #1. Part of this can be laid at McCloughan’s feet for refusing to resign quality OGs like J. Smiley or refusing to draft a top OT for the right side. But even given marginal personnel, this OL is historically bad.

We’re almost halfway through the season and some of us are beginning to see that Sing’s primary plan to improve the OL play is to call for more cohesion but mostly just hope things gets better. Sure, they’re giving Rachal some advanced tutoring on reacting to stunts and moving Snyder around a little, but that isn’t enough. And without improved OL play, this team is going nowhere in a hurry. And it won’t matter who is playing QB if the OL can’t open holes for the runners or keep D-linemen out of the backfield.

by MontanaPass on Oct 27, 2009 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think Sing's career will be much Cowher's

A former LB that knows defense, is an excellent motivator and leader. What helped Cowher was having excellent coordinators. I believe his DC was either LeBeau or Hasslett for his entire run. His OC were Erhardt, Mularkey and Whisenhunt. He knew as much about offense as Sing but also gave his OC some free reign with play calling. Lastly, he had the consistent support of ownership and a FO that made very wise decisions with drafting and free-agency.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 27, 2009 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't mind the weakness on X's on O's

This can actually turn out to be a strength over time. Singletary is still inexperienced and hasn’t learned to trust his coordinators. IMO, it’s the coordinators job to handle the X’s and O’s of a football team. Singletary’s job is to keep the team focused, working hard, manage the moral and set the tone/direction for the football team. He’s the guy whose job is to make sure the players a paying attention to the coordinators.

Parcells wasn’t an X’s and O’s guy, neither was Cowher or Marty Schottenheimer. I’d much rather have Singletary mold himself into their direction than try to pick up a playbook and start to draw up formations and plays.

by bignerd on Oct 27, 2009 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Where is it on display that he is weak on the X's and O's

Sing is focusing on performance and effort on each play. Mental lapses and such, that’s why you see him addressing individuals nearly each and every down or change of possession. He has to understand X’s and O’s he is a HOF MLB from one of the best defenses ever. He was the Captain on the field, so how is it he’s weak on X’s and O’s. He choosing to let his OC and DC do their job and he focus’ on the team direction and performance as a whole, he is only one person. Where exactly is he lacking in the X’s and O’s dept other than Offense?

"Optimist Prime"
"Child Please" -Ochocinco

by rlott#42 on Oct 27, 2009 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I approve

But the quote from Florida Danny is right on, very Nolan-esque. It is interesting how Singletary works mind games on guys though. With Crabtree he throws him in there to prove himself, with Alex Smith he refers to making him work for it, to want to earn his spot. I like the way Sing says his decisions come down to winning, but is that not just a way of deflecting criticism for a new coach? Next week is going to be huge, I didn’t like how Alex Smith said he was “Happy” after a loss but if he goes out and shows improvement and not complacency next week I will be feeling a lot better.

by FiveAlarmFreddy on Oct 27, 2009 8:53 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

The previous two games have also been "huge"

And the team failed miserably…

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

by chikmagnet_565 on Oct 27, 2009 9:05 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Atlanta

was a miserable failure. I thought Houston was a semi-failure.

Looking to put San Fran*six-o* here some time soon!

by dartdart on Oct 27, 2009 10:21 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The point for Sing is that he DID make the change to Smith.

He also saw the ability and condition of Crabtree and let me play and prove himself. Which he did in my eyes.

Now he needs to make a decision on punt returns but one thing we don’t know is what the problem was with Rossum. Sing indicated in Sunday’s post game or yesterday’s conf that there were problems with Rossum also.

This year I am more into seeing improvement in the team and I have seen that.. and now we can see the areas where changes need to be made like adding a top RT and a SS. Also, a top punt returner would help, especially if he played a anothe position like CB at a top level.

"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"

by Eastbayjim on Oct 27, 2009 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As far as I can tell, the Forty-Niners are still one quarterback and one offensive line away from having a respectable offense. Maybe Nate Davis is the QB who will be the one, maybe not. But I don’t think either Smith or Hill is. There are components of a good offensive line on the team now, however I think the current right side isn’t part of that OL; new personnel need to be acquired.

Defensive players have stopped communicating. On whom does that fall?

So, Singletary has generally done the best he can with what he’s got. He’s made some questionable roster choices (e.g., Rossum). On the surface he seems to have things moving in the right direction, but he and the team need to get better. I’ve given him another ‘Yes’ this week.

Truth has a well-known liberal bias.

by dianemarie on Oct 27, 2009 9:10 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Well, we also need...

…a stud pass rusher. One of the golden nuggets last week was a fascinating dissection of the game film of the Falcons game. Basically, their max protection scheme exposed this key weakness in our defense. Because we don’t have individual pass rushers with the ability to win, we have to scheme to get pressure on the QB. We’ve been able to do that against some teams, but not the Falcons because of their max protection.

by Bigmouth on Oct 27, 2009 9:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This.

Lack of a dominant pass-rusher. With one of those, the team would have more room for error. Having a gy that demands double teams yets still beats those on occasion opens up every other passrusher and makes the secondary look even better. This, along with better o-line play, are the two weaknesses.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 27, 2009 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would still like

to give Haralson until the end of this year. He looked like he added a new inside move recently, and it worked pretty well on sunday.
I’ve given up on Manny.
Brooks may develop.

by goatfather on Oct 27, 2009 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

They're good not great

And I like Haralson. I’d have him opposite a Derrick Thomas/Charles Haley/Rickey Jackson type. Those guys consistently beat man blocking and demanded a double team which they could also beat. Our current guys can’t beat a double and none demands one. Imagine if Haralson always had one man blocking him because they guy on the other side is so good? I’m fine with Manny on 1st down and running downs but it would be nice to have a great rusher come in for him on 3rd or obvious passing downs.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 27, 2009 10:03 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

the question is

how do we get this guy. I’m weary about paying big free agent money. If that guy doesn’t work out it could be bad.

by goatfather on Oct 27, 2009 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Draft

We have draft a guy who is purely a pass rusher. We have to disregard their pass coverage abilty. Nobody ever talks about Demarcus Ware’s coverage because he get sacks. You ever seen TCU DE Jerry Hughes or USF DE George Selvie.

by ckurt49 on Oct 27, 2009 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yep - the draft

I have not seen either of these guys but if they are it, by all means draft a guy, even if he mostly develops into a Fred Dean role (may not start but plays a great deal and alwasy on passing downs), that would work.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 27, 2009 10:40 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A pass rush is desperately needed

which is why Kentwan Balmer is so frustrating. A career 9 tackles, 0 sacks.

by FiveAlarmFreddy on Oct 27, 2009 3:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good not great

That sums up our entire team. 3 and 3.

Looking to put San Fran*six-o* here some time soon!

by dartdart on Oct 27, 2009 10:23 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Only missing a few pieces

Look at the best teams. They don’t have pro-bowlers in all positions. You can’t have true greatness everywhere. You need it in the right places: QB, skill positions, line play. We need better QB play. We need a RT and Guard (they don’t have to be great, just good). We need a great pass rusher. Improve those spots, you’d be amazed how “great” the secondary would look. How many more yards our receivers and Gore would gain. We finally, for the first time in years, have talent (potentially great) at the skill positions. And we certainly have the core guys that do the little things. We now need the extra two or three difference makers to move away from good and toward great.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 27, 2009 10:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Chilo Rachal will be ok at G. They are working with him on correcting the problems he has.

Also, having a turnstile at RT does not help the RG.

"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"

by Eastbayjim on Oct 27, 2009 10:57 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree about Richal... Well, I hope with him

I certainly would not give up on him. But for now, ideally he sits more than plays. Not sure if that will happen though with Pashos injured.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 27, 2009 11:01 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

...at

[some or most of] the skill positions…

Looking to put San Fran*six-o* here some time soon!

by dartdart on Oct 27, 2009 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dominant Pass-Rusher

Except getting a dominant pass-rusher is like getting 7’1" shot blocking, rebounding, low post dominating center for your basketball team.

You can draft and draft for years and never come close getting one. Roughly 6-10 pass rushing prospects are drafted in the 1st round each year. Still the league has probably six maybe eight guys who truly are dominate pass-rushers.

Even if the 49ers draft a pass rusher this April, I’m not holding my breathe. Maybe a safety or top prospect LB is more practical.

by bignerd on Oct 27, 2009 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

All true

And can be said for many positions. I do think we have to attempt to draft an outside rusher if there is one at all worth the risk of where the current selection is.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 27, 2009 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And can be said for many positions

QB’s and WR have a high bust rate (not nearly as bad as pass rushers) but at other position you typically get back what you draft in the 1st round.

Revisit the 49ers drafts for the entire 90’s. Spent the entire decade trying to replace Charles Haley, that’s how fruitless the adventure for finding a pass rusher can be. You can end up drafting two new teams before you finally find one.

by bignerd on Oct 27, 2009 1:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did we really try?

I ask honestly. Other than waaay over-reaching on that Israel Iffiyani guy from USC, I can’t think of one off the top of my head. Meanwhile Donahue passed on a NT we needed (Wilfork) for Woods. But I can’t recall an outside rusher we drafted. I know we signed Rickey Jackson, Chris Doleman and Kevin Greene who all did well in the short term.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 27, 2009 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have to admit...

…I had bad flashbacks to Nolan — and Martz with that delay penalty at the end of the game. Still, this is early in Samurai Mike’s tenure. If he’s making the same mistakes a year or two from now….well, that’s different. Also, Sing’s lack of spin makes it easier to forgive him.

by Bigmouth on Oct 27, 2009 9:16 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

so what do we have to do?

Why are we so bad in this situation? Is it the teams with combos like these; Favre-Peterson, Turner – Ryan, Shaub – Slaton?

by goatfather on Oct 27, 2009 9:52 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And we play the Colts this weekend. The 49ers schedule has forced them to play the best play action teams in the league so far.

Defensively I think they have done well. If they had a player like Eric Berry in the backfield they might of had enough of a match up advantage to shut those teams down. Instead they have Roman chasing the 3rd passing option around the field and it’s costing them extra yards and 1st downs,

by bignerd on Oct 27, 2009 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just like

The play Dashon bit on (so to speak).

Looking to put San Fran*six-o* here some time soon!

by dartdart on Oct 27, 2009 10:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I put it on having a new QB during the game

I don’t like it. But a QB that hasn’t played in two years calling plays we haven’t used all season, on the road, with a rookie WR with limited routes; this will lead to some problems. It should also be noted the shuffling O-line they had during the second half. There were some, such as Morgan being the 12th man in the huddle, that really frustrate. I put this on Raye since he’s calling plays, but I would suggest that Sing interject himself into this and not leave it to his coordinator, since it is a problem.

On a positive, if you blame Sing for the offense then credit him (and Manusky, of course) for this: in six games, our defense has forced 5 punts on the opening drive and not allowed the oposing offense to earn a first down in any of the five (AZ got one first due to a questionable penalty on Smith but still went 3 & out). Just imagine if our offense could take advantage of this?

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 27, 2009 9:59 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

crabtree has limited routes?

He played at the X Y and Z already. I can’t imagine there is a route he cannot run. He is a naturally talented receiver and he understands the game.

Also, how much do you think the Niners practiced the plays we saw in the second half; lining up in the spread?

by goatfather on Oct 27, 2009 10:09 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

From what I read

His routes were to be all outside the numbers. So no crossing routes, post routes, combination routes or anything were he had to read the inside defenders and their zones. He also only new the plays in the game plan, and I’m sure the game plan did not call for all that passing due to being down 21 points. If he had a full grasp of the entire playbook and Alex had run a 2-minute drill in the past two years, I think things would have gone a bit more smoothly. It’ll take time so I can forgive some of the timing errors on Sunday.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 27, 2009 10:47 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

"were to be"

he “was supposed” to only play the slow, that changed, he “was supposed” to see about 15 plays, that changed. It’s entirely possible he knows all the routes by next week.

by goatfather on Oct 27, 2009 11:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think the slot thing went out window

As soon as Sing said he might start.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 27, 2009 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

the point

is that he learns very quickly and performs immediately

by goatfather on Oct 27, 2009 12:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think you misunderstood my initial point

It was referencing Sunday’s game and what was causing some issues with getting plays in while trying to run a hurry up offense. There was no insult to Crabtree or assumption that he won’t be better this week and continue to be going forward. I’m just keeping the perspective that he is a rookie and still has some limitations in the offense.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 27, 2009 1:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not His Low

He got down to 82% last year.

by daveofferson on Oct 27, 2009 10:21 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I Approve of Sing

We knew we needed a QB change to spice up the offense, but who knew Alex Smith would play like he did. Credit Sing for making the change. He was also able to explain his reasoning very well. He had togo with Hill at the beginning. Hill basically helped him get the coaching job. I’ve only really had problems with personal decisions like punt returner only 2 rbs 7-8 receivers. But he is still learning. Heck I thought we’d get atleast 2-3 more weeks of Hill. So give the man some credit. We do need a stud pass rusher but give him a break its his first full season.

by ckurt49 on Oct 27, 2009 10:26 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Sing Get a Emphatic Yes Vote

from me. But, I’d like him to have a side kick that managed the clock. He’s the motivational speaker coach. He knows the people side of things and will get that intensity. I don’t honestly think he’s that good at the meat and potatoes of coaching on either side of the ball (inhereted credibility from super bowl shuffle aside). Does anyone know if he’s won at any level besides ON the field? HS coach? College coach? I don’t think he has a track record to speak of, aside from the certified and accredited eyeball stare… which is awesome. Still, I love the guy. It’s like Ron Reagan. You just liked him regardless of his being in the WH with Alzheimers.

Looking to put San Fran*six-o* here some time soon!

by dartdart on Oct 27, 2009 10:40 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I've got to say yes...

It takes a lot of guts to bench a QB that took most of the snaps in practice for two weeks and put in a guy that hasn’t seen action in two years. Time management has been a problem since the Cards game last year, and in pressure situations that needs to be remedied. Execution, though under his watch, is the players responsibility and I believe the changes he has and will make is going to make the team better.

by Natural Red on Oct 27, 2009 11:59 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Voted yes

I said I go per week last week and for this week, Singletary restored some of my faith in his desire to win. I can understand the case made that he should’ve pulled Hill sooner, but given what he’s done in the first four weeks, there had to have been some slack given for Hill to allow him to redeem himself. Giving him until halftime was long enough and Hill failed. Making the change at halftime showed that Singletary knew that staying the course would be a bad idea and it proved him right. It didn’t get the win, but it provided a chance.

by Ovalshine on Oct 27, 2009 1:09 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

The o-line...

either needs another overhaul or else find another o-line coach. Coach Sing still has my vote of approval, given the circumstances. The fact that he’s willing to make the switch to Alex when Shaun was clearly not getting it done shows me he’s willing to make changes sooner rather than later when something isn’t working.

And why not? The kid doesn’t have anything to lose at this point. He doesn’t have all the hype of living up to his status as the number 1 pick in the 2005 draft, which I think is an enormous weight off Alex’s shoulders. And I also think he wants to prove to a lot of people that he wasn’t a bust. It took Drew Brees the better part of 2 seasons to figure it out…the same amount of time Alex has been sitting on the sidelines learning the ways of the NFL. From here on out, only time will tell whether he was worth the investment.

by Doni S on Oct 27, 2009 1:21 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

QB

That game was about the QB position. I didn’t start watching until the third quarter. What I saw was Mike Singletary place Alex Smith in charge, with surprising confidence. Alex Smith threw three touchdown passes to Vernon Davis, and a couple great out passes to Michael Crabtree. Smith’s game management rust twice caused the Niners to take delay of game calls. Those delay of games ended up being important.

The only questionable time management moment I noticed was when the Niners waited until after the 2 minute warning to take that timeout.

by coicoy on Oct 27, 2009 1:25 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

That last delay of game...

…was Raye’s fault, not Smith’s.

by Bigmouth on Oct 27, 2009 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

VD is the reason i voted yes

When he was drafted it was because of his ability, not so much his play or character. He was arrogant and would cost the team in stupid penaltys all the time, constantly underachieving and showing only flashes of what he could really do. Sing has gone and given him the drive to become a great football player, and hes well on his way to being one of the best TE’s in the league. The questions about him being drafted too high are put the rest.

Also because although hes been stubborn with the running game along with Raye. Im glad he was willing to put Alex in there when the moment came. Hill was restricted with what he could do. With Alex the offense has limitless potential. You better believe Smith is going to be throwing plenty of balls to Crabtree as well, he was throwing the ball into some tight spaces when throwing to Crabs… its obvious he has trust in his hands

by Beatclash on Oct 27, 2009 2:23 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I still agree......

with Singletary….but I just wonder WHY is Mark Roman still on the team let alone starting/playing?? I know the starting answer is because M Lewis is out with concussion, but the Packers cut him because he sucked, and he has been horrendous ever since joining our team?? Never makes a play……never creates turnovers…..I mean how hard is it to see this? And has there been a Manny Lawson sighting? He should be a force out there, but has declined every game so far? And lastly…….when a NFL team can watch tape a prepare for you knowing you have the same darn offensive tendencies YOU HAVE NO SHOT PERIOD!! 1st down run, 2nd down run, 3rd down pass…..OR 1st down screen(incomplete) 2nd down run 3rd down run………OPEN IT UP FOR CRYING OUT LOUD!

by Italian Stallion on Oct 27, 2009 2:51 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I think I feel the same way as a lot of people

overall I approve – but coming out flat and seemingly ill prepared after the bye week was unacceptable. My personal approval rating is going down, but I still approve of the overall job.

A hearty thank you to Rich Aurilia for all the good memories, and to the Niners for finally getting the uni's (mostly) right.

by wjackalope on Oct 27, 2009 2:55 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Do you really feel the team was flat? Or just the offense

because the defense opened with a three and out, followed by one first down then punt. They didn’t look flat. Neither did the kick coverage units.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 28, 2009 12:33 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sing is approved as far as I am concerned

The Alex Smith process is the best decision he has made. I’m not talking about about starting Smith, I’m talking about being aware he needed to get comfortable in yet another Offense and also get comfortable getting over the injury. Instead of throwing him in the fire and alienating Hill. Sing was smart enough to understand that Hill would have been serviceable enough to get some wins. If the OL were able to open lanes and provide ground support our record would be better. This myth about him not understanding X’s and O’s is bs and also the concept of a Nolan-esque performance. He let’s his coordinators handle their jobs and I believe he makes adjustments on defense, just not with the playcalling. Approval for Sing, simply because at 2-2 or 2-3 last year, there is still more to be optimistic about, our team is bettter and it’s also the same. Maybe he should handle more with the defense but I am sure he knows nothing much about offense.

"Optimist Prime"
"Child Please" -Ochocinco

by rlott#42 on Oct 27, 2009 3:00 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

will we open up a 5 receiver set?

Our potential may be in our passing, no matter what everyone else says

by dalien82 on Oct 27, 2009 8:24 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

This team isn't about Singletary...

Singletary is a holdover from a failed regime. That;s not bagging on the coach, rather, if the 49ers fail, it really isn’t on him. Singletary is not that good of a HC yet. From what I see, he is very green and really isn’t that good. He is doing a good job with what he has, and he does have potential, but there is no way in hell he can resurrect this Franchise on his own. He isn’t THAT good. Look at Ryan and McDaniels. Those teams are tougher than Sing’s “Hit ’em in the mouth” 49ers, and they can beat the 49ers as well. Sing hasn’t been able to establish a cohesive philosophy yet. Do we know what kind of team this is yet? No. There are a lot of question marks on this team, and if Singletary takes a flawed team riddled in injuries to the playoffs with a 9-7 record, it still won’t be enough to compre with the pace of DEN sweeping their Division, and beating teams out of conference to go to 11-5.

Singeltary is not that good of a HC yet. Let’s not pin this season, if it fails on him. It’s the shitty FO that will fail any HC.

Well, we're waiting....

by drummer on Oct 29, 2009 3:21 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

"We'll see them again in the playoffs." -- Coach Mike Singletary after a gut-wrenching week 3 loss to the Vikings.
Start posting about the 49ers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dave_small
Week 11 Prediction Games
Howtheyscoredcat_small
Official Alex Smith [Over]Reaction Thread: Bears Edition
Small
Alex Smith vs Aaron Rodgers(updated)
Small
The Titans/Niners play-by-play
Dave_small
Week 10 Prediction Games

Recent FanPosts

Small
10 things the 49ers should not do
Italian_flag_small
Still think the Niners will reach the playoffs???
2305d0d49c908218_small
Packers fan with some questions
49ers_small
I have a feeling about this particular road game
Joe_and_bill_small
49ers QB - 2010
Small
Jimmy Raye - Ken Whisenhunt
Small
Niners Nation hits the big time
Shaun_hill_small
SINGLETARY WAS HIRED BECAUSE OF SHAUN HILL !!
Howtheyscoredcat_small
Week 10 Prediction Games: The Riveting Results

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Bolts From The Blue
Week 11 Injury Report: SD @ DEN
Mobile Live
Eagles shuffle linebackers again
Mobile Live
The VRR: Redskins (3-6) @ Cowboys (6-3)

SPONSORS


Head Ball Coach

Dave_small Fooch

Editors

Jerry_rice_small ProfessorBigelow

Assistant Coaches

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

Pixies_logo_small Florida Danny

M_12a62905a0324d2da2f43ddaf62c630f_small Ninjames

Duct_tape_bandit_small Josh from Hollywood

Crab_tree_small briandean

Moderators

Jackalope_card_small wjackalope