49ers 35 - Rams 0: Mike Singletary's Formula for Success
After a week off, we return with Mike Singletary's Formula for Success. Although there are certainly issues to be dissatisfied with, I think we can all look at the bright side of things this morning. It may have been the "same old sorry Rams," but a dominant defensive performance like that is good no matter who the opponent is. One plus to doing it to the Rams is that they were a team the 49ers were supposed to beat badly, and they did just that.
For those that don't know, last season Mike Singletary introduced something he called his Formula for Success. It consisted of five concepts, where if the 49ers have success, they put themselves in an excellent position to win a ballgame. Each Monday (for the most part), we take a quick look back at the previous day's game and see how the team did in each of these concepts. These concepts are:
1. Total Ball Security
2. Execute
3. Dominate the trenches
4. Create great field position
5. Finish
After the jump we apply the Formula for Success to yesterday's 35-0 pasting of the Rams.
Total Ball Security
The 49ers did very well in this area on both sides of the ball. On defense, the aggressive 49ers made plays happen in one instance (Willis TD), and took advantage of atrocious Rams mistakes in other instances (McDonald and McKillop TDs). The defense took a big step in converting turnovers into immediate scores. John Lynch said it several times, and it bears repeating. Good defenses force turnovers. Great defenses seem to accumulate an impressive number of defensive touchdowns. I have no proof to back that statement up, but it does seem like the all-time great defenses have made points on their own.
On offense, the 49ers offense continued their pattern of protecting the ball. Maybe it's a product of a conservative offense, but after the first half of last season, a low number of turnovers is welcome. The team did seem to open the playbook a little bit yesterday and there were no turnover repercussions. There were of course the pass plays, but they also mixed in some sweeps. Sweeps generally don't lead to turnovers, but with a rookie running back, you never know what might happen.
Execute
Defensive execution was stellar yesterday. The Rams did convert 5 third downs, but their offense was never really much of a threat. The defense did a good job stopping the run yet again and I'll continue pointing to the open field tackling abilities of the secondary. Michael Lewis is primarily a run stopper. Nate Clements is a solid cover corner, but he's a spectacular open field tackler, particularly when stopping running backs. I realize covering the receiver is the flashy part of his big contract, but his contributions in the run game cannot be minimized. While a ball-hawking pass defense is great, seeing every 49er defender swarming on running backs in the backfield is so much fun to watch.
Offensive execution had it's ups and downs. When I post this week's Jimmy Raye Approval Rating, I'll go into more detail, but his play-calling was not the problem today. The play-calling was in fact creative and played to the passing strengths of the team. Heck they even mixed in some outside sweeps for Coffee. The problem was in execution. They get credit for excellent execution on the two touchdown drives, but they also get negative marks for most of the rest of the game. As has been pointed out this is primarily due to the offensive line. Singletary has said he thinks this could be a great line and that they're sort of getting in their own way. As long as the o-line struggles, it will remain a concern.
Dominate the Trenches
As was discussed above, the offensive line did not dominate the trenches. Glen Coffee couldn't get much going and Shaun Hill took quite the beating. Hill was asked after the game how he felt physically and he said, "I feel like I played an NFL football game." He was sacked four times and took 5 hits (not sure if those 5 hits include the 4 sacks). Either way, he spent a lot of time getting knocked around.
Defensively, as with every aspect of the game, they dominated. Steven Jackson found some holes on occasion, but for the most part was contained. The linebackers and secondary made plays outside the tackles, but inside the defensive line opened up some serious holes for the linebackers to pounce on Jackson. It carried over into the passing game as the pass rush was nothing short of beastly. Five sacks and nine QB hits likely left Kyle Boller rather discouraged. It was a bad Rams team, but this kind of game can only help a defense's confidence. Particularly with a tough Atlanta offense coming to town next week.
Create great field position
It was intriguing to see Allen Rossum deactivated this week. Aside from a called back TD return, Rossum has been pretty much non-existent. I'm extremely curious to see how this continues to develop. However, the defense did help create good field position. The first touchdown came after a Rams punt DEEP in their own territory left the 49ers starting at midfield. And of course, you can't get much better field position than scoring on defense. I remain concerned about the kick return game and am curious how this all develops. Spurlock AND Rossum were inactive, but we saw very little from Jason Hill and Brandon Jones. It's hard to decipher the situation at this point. Any thoughts?
Finish
This was the best "Finishing" of a game I've seen in a long time by the 49ers, on both sides of the ball. The 49ers were up 21-0 and easily could have gone into 3 rushes and punt for the last 20 minutes or so of the game. Instead, they went for the jugular, which is exactly what we like to see. On offense they continued to open up the passing game, leading to the Josh Morgan touchdown. Why go three and out when you can go deep!
As for the defense? Well, they never let up the entire game. I'm guessing they really wanted that shutout, and that kept them a little extra motivated. I'm trying to remember the last time a 49ers defense put together this kind of complete effort for 60 minutes. A quick look back and it might have been Dennis Erickson's debut game against the Bears in 2003. The 49ers won the game 49-7, forcing 5 turnovers, sacking the QB 5 times and holding the Bears to 127 total yards. Let's just move on and avoid any future comparisons to a Dennis Erickson coached team.
0 recs |
26 comments
|
Comments
Dennis Erickson……lalalalalalalalalalalala………I didn’t hear that name……….
FIRE BRUCE BOCHY NOW!!!!!!
AND TAKE BRIAN SABEAN WITH HIM!!!!!
by 49er16 on Oct 5, 2009 8:05 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Happy Times
This win kind of erases last weeks heart breaker. Now if #4 loses tonight I’ll be happy. If he gets his head knocked off I’ll love it. He’ll be doing BenGay commercials soon.
by japanesezero on Oct 5, 2009 8:38 AM PDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Our game ending just in time to watch Dallas lose made for a great Sunday
Many Niners fans gathered around the TVs at Candlestick to watch the final two minutes of Dallas-Denver. We got to let out another huge cheer when the Cowboys lost. Sweet.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Oct 5, 2009 12:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
wonder if anyone noticed that,
just like in the article when we were up 21-0. instead of run,run,run,punt, they went for the score to put us up by 28. i luvd that, it show courage(or balls) & the ability to learn from past mistake(viking game). I hope raye keeps learning from his mistake and adjust accordingly the rest of the season. that could be the difference on how our season ends. GO NINERS all day every day
by calinig4life on Oct 5, 2009 9:25 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Defense and Special Teams
carried the day against a bad St. Louis team. I was still not wholly impressed with our offense against a bad St. Louis defense. I thought our offense looked better against the Cardinals. Still, teams play down to their opponents. Josh Morgan missed the nicest Shaun Hill pass I’ve seen. With that missed TD and the missed FGs by both teams it could have been 45-3. I know we did good. We just have to have the complete package next week against the Falcons. I still remember when they stopped us from getting to the playoffs in ? ‘91? We still went 10-6 but they kept us out for the first time in like 10 years. Hate the birds. Hope we show them some stuff this week. Wonder if a stellar performance like this is making Rex Ryan (et al’s) illegal offer smell a little worse to Crab-triz-é…
Looking to put San Fran*six-o* here some time soon!
by dartdart on Oct 5, 2009 9:57 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I like your long memory hate
You can add the ’98 season Divisional playoff game in Atlanta, where the Hearst injury on the first play of the game contributed greatly to our 2 point loss. That was our last Steve Young playoff team and last real SB threat.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Oct 5, 2009 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I remember that game too
Grrr.
I still have more hate inside me for the Cowboys though.
by smileyman on Oct 5, 2009 1:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Always!!
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Oct 5, 2009 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I Can't believe I will be a CHEESHEAD for a day...
by WC-Ninerhead on Oct 5, 2009 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't think of it that way
Much like last week’s MNF game, hope that both teams get beat up and enjoy the thought of each team losing at various points. When Carolina was leading, it felt good seeing the Cowboys struggle and their fans boo. When Dallas took the lead, it felt great knowing our Carolina draft pick kept shooting toward the top.
Also, even if Minnesota wins tonight check out their upcoming schedule (BAL, @PIT, @GB). There’s a losing streak coming to Minneapolis and it may leave a battered QB in its wake.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Oct 5, 2009 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've transferred my Packer hate to
Brett Favre. Besides I need Aaron Rodgers to have a good day to win my fantasy game.
by smileyman on Oct 5, 2009 4:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just need 6 pts from Rodgers to win my final fantasy matchup
I’ve been unstoppable for the past 2 weeks (5-0….6-0 if Rodgers passes for 120 yds or a TD)
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by chikmagnet_565 on Oct 5, 2009 4:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I need Rodgers to pass for four touchdowns and 250 yards to win.
I’m, uh, not hopeful.
GROUGTHINK ALERT
The first Chester Arthur fanboy ever.
by groug on Oct 5, 2009 4:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Defense did what it was suppose to do.
3 TDs ? AWESOME !
Now, the real story. It’s the Rams !!! Next Sunday will be a real Fight !!!
I’m not concen that the Defense can keep us in the game but until the Offense can open holes and protect Hill, I’m keeping my fingers cross. We have to beat theses teams that made the P/O last year and until we do, we no better than a first round playoff team. Now, don’t get me wrong. I’m a believer and I want them to win the SB, but I also realize that to do that, we have to do a better job with the OL.
by LASVEGASNINER on Oct 5, 2009 10:46 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I am with you on this one..
I am a beliver in the D and ST but the O still has me worried especially the run game. The really weird thing is that the “run” was supposed to be our “forte” this year hasn’t done squat. I am not pointing the finger the RB’s but am looking the O-line and play calling as the culprit. I had thought I heard from the announcers on yesterday’s game that Coffee and noted them that he got chewed out by Reye for trying to break runs to the outside.. Seems that Reye said that if the play is designed to go inside then damn it he should run it the inside.. Not sure anyone else heard that but if there is any little bit of truth to then shame on Reye. Just a good QB must use his instincts to move the ball, same goes for a good back.. If the hole ain’t there thene it ain’t there so make one of your own if you have to but just move the frigging ball…
.
by WC-Ninerhead on Oct 5, 2009 11:02 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The play calling was decent, but the OL is playing badly.
We had screen passes, a reverse that actually worked, and downfield passes that came at opportune times, so I don’t think the play calling was at fault this week. Unfortunately, the OL continues to suck, with Baas and Rachal having poor games this week while Snyder played well in pass pro. After four games, the “it’s only the beginning of the season” excuse is wearing thin and I think we need to start looking at the talent level. Is it time to swap Wragge for Baas? Rachal is still effectively a rookie and has so much potential he deserves some slack as he learns the tricks of the trade. Snyder? Who knows, but he’s definitely a liability when up against speed rushers. I don’t know what to think at this point, but watching the Steeler’s OL blow open holes for Mendenhall last night made me want to swap offensive lines straight over.
by MontanaPass on Oct 5, 2009 11:22 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes the OL sucks and needs to improve
but my issue with Raye is not play calling in general as too see the improvement, but my issue is that knowing that he has an OL that sucks he is still calling for run plays as if he had an all pro line.
As I said above, it the hole in the middle isn;t there then allow your backs to use their skill and speed to make a move to the outside if isn’t there in the middle. Yea I know we want people to “run down hill…” but sometimes you do need to run around the dang hill (no pun intended here)
.Also I haven;t seen #44 get a call to carry the ball much. Gore and Coffee are good but we might find a bit more success if they had Norris run a body or two over with ball in hand.
I don’t want to be too critical here because we are playing better O than in many years past, I just want to the O play at the same level as the D. I think you hear my frustration. We can’ t play many halfs like we did the first half and expect to be where we think we are going…
Goooo Niinnneerrrss
by WC-Ninerhead on Oct 5, 2009 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
what play can you call with a bad OL?
none. There are no good plays with a bad OL. If there were good plays with a bad OL, they would also work with a good OL. So they would be perfect plays. So no one would ever call anything else.
FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.
by zenbitz on Oct 5, 2009 3:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
DartDart said it best
We can fight the fight. We can step up to anyone. When our offense needs to step up they will. Look how we good we are! “we havent even scratched the surface”
by dalien82 on Oct 5, 2009 11:36 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'll tell ya' straight up...
the reason why our o-line is ‘so-so’ is because we drafted these guys in the 2nd and 3rd rounds. Staley is only exception being that he was a 1st rounder. Does it concern me that our o-line is mediocre at best? Yes. However, we are 3 – 1 and undefeated thus far in our first 3 division games. We’re winning, which to me is all that really matters.
by Doni S on Oct 5, 2009 12:07 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Baas and Rachal were both high second rounders
That’s about as high as any guards usually go. Heitmann was a 7th round pick but he’s pretty good so there’s no problem with that. Snyder was a late 3rd rounder, and he’s… yeah. We need a RT.
by Brendan Scolari on Oct 5, 2009 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Totally agree re your assessment of Raye...
…whose play-calling was much improved.
by Bigmouth on Oct 5, 2009 12:17 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Quick Hitz
1) OL bad, DL good
2) Niners very lucky on 14 of their turnover points. Lawson was in the right place at the right time to “encourage” the fumble on the pitch out (I won’t say “force” – the ball was bobbled), but you cannot count on getting 6 when the punt return team kicks the ball in the endzone. Similarly, the Rams were terrible in terms of penalties.
3) Hill… throws ducks but at least they are to our team. He might not survive the season though.
4) Coffee…was getting hit early (see 1), but he cannot really break tackles like Gore.
5) Raye – I thought the play calling was excellent. The plays that worked clearly had the Rams off guard (remember the nice fullback counter on 3rd and short?) plus little screens and dunks etc., and even got some deep stuff working. When it failed – it was clearly the OL not getting any push up front or holding the pocket open.
6) As others have said, the defense played for 60 min with full intensity.
I disagree somewhat with John Lynch about how “Great defenses” force a lot of turnovers. I think some defenses do focus on turnovers, but they often get burned. Most turnovers are caused by the offense having to play catch
FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.
by zenbitz on Oct 6, 2009 9:57 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
up. Also when you have a good defense and a terrible offense, your great defense gets more chances to make plays.
FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.
by zenbitz on Oct 6, 2009 9:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 






















