Niners Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: The Boxing Bulletin for Boxing Fans!

Jimmy Raye Approval Rating, Week 4

Jimmy_raye_approval_rating_medium

Last week we introduced the all-new Jimmy Raye Approval Rating.  In spite of the team's early success there were plenty of rumblings about the performance of the 49ers offense.  The first three weeks saw a team that was trying to rush the ball into brick walls and not getting all that creative.  Folks were begging for even some screens and sweeps on occasion.  Nothing crazy, just a little this and that.

Well, a week later, we saw some changes.  My view of the offense last week versus St. Louis was that the play-calling was fine, it was the execution that was severely lagging.  The offense used outside runs, screen passes, and even threw to Josh Morgan quite a bit more.  The problem in execution came down in large part to the offensive line.  Shaun Hill was not getting nearly enough time to make plays against a St. Louis Rams defense that should inspire fear in nobody.  In his Monday press conference, Singletary specifically called out the play of the two offensive guards as major culprits.

Going forward, the offense will remain a major area of interest for me.  Obviously there's the Michael Crabtree addition.  We'll deal with that more later.  For now, with Atlanta coming to town on Sunday, it's a matter of what will we see on Sunday from the play-calling.  Is the development and creativity of the offensive game plan going to continue to increase each week?  How much more of this Shaun Hill-Vernon Davis connection will we see?  The Atlanta defense isn't all that great, but we said the same thing about the Rams.  What will we see this week, and do you approve of where Jimmy Raye is going with things after four weeks?

Poll
Do you approve of the job Jimmy Raye is doing as offensive coordinator?
Yes
666 votes
No
416 votes

1082 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 53 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I approve.

He does’nt want to turn the ball over it crucial situations, but still trusts Hill to open up the passing game. And if they focus on the run we won’t mindlessly pound it in there. (Except when there is 2 mins left vs Min.)

by Riceball on Oct 8, 2009 8:25 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

There needs to be a "meh" option. : )

I realize by giving only “yes” and “no” you want to force the reader’s hand to come down one way or the other, but in this instance the best description of how I feel about his play calling is “meh.”

Noonan. Nooooonan!

by Giant Fan in Singapore on Oct 8, 2009 8:53 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Agreed.

I voted no, but I don’t really disapprove so far per say. I just haven’t exactly been thrilled with the job he’s done.

by Brendan Scolari on Oct 8, 2009 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think...

… that so long as the urge to want him out isn’t greater than the urge to support him, then it should be a “Yes.” The Raye situation is pretty much going to come down to whether or not the 49ers keep winning. If they start losing, especially if it’s because of the offense, his approval rating will go downhill fast.

by sfgfan on Oct 8, 2009 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes

4 da most part. as long as he’s adjustin his his game plan for the week & n da game then i’m coo wit it. every week he’s bringin sumden new & creative from da week b4. it’s not an out rite yes, it’s a we’re winnin rite now & keep it go YES

by calinig4life on Oct 8, 2009 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

IAWTC

"Pat is still just scratching the surface." - Coach Singletary on LB Patrick Willis

by 49erLou on Oct 8, 2009 10:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I voted yes… but have really not been happy with the 3rd down calls. I hope that getting Crabtree will help with those.

There’s definitely room to improve. Needs to mix it up more

by Drew K on Oct 8, 2009 10:13 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He is trying.

Like I said last week, we need to try some short pass plays, screens and such. We did try and my hats off to Ray. You can teach an old dog new tricks. Hopefully we will execute these plays this week.

by 49RFAN on Oct 8, 2009 9:09 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I think that we're not really realizing how far away we are from being behind the scenes

Yes the offense is vanilla, but it really seems to be that Raye is handicapped by what our offensive line is capable of in terms of pass blocking. I’d much rather have Raye accept reality and work with it while we’re trying to improve it than Martz insisting one 9 consecutive 7-step drops behind a line that simply isn’t built for it.

by foosball4949 on Oct 8, 2009 9:11 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 8, 2009 10:11 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He called what I wanted to see

Granted the offense didn’t make the calls look great because of the lack of execution. But the calls I wanted to see, the screens, the sweeps, the small stuff was there a lot more. I would like to see more draws but with way we were throwing the ball, those plays would obviously have been for no gain. Overall, I thought the play calling was an improvement which is all we can hope for.

by agchee on Oct 8, 2009 9:33 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Offense Line

If the line had better pass protection, I’d bet we would see more passes and a better approval rating

Physical with an 'F'
Mike Singletary

by Bertleman on Oct 8, 2009 9:51 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Close Games

Of all the “other” OC we had, there has not been (a) blowout (b) shoutout and © more than 2 tds a game. Sounds like a good OC to me. I know the defense is playing better than last year, but we are putting up points when needed and we are taking more chances with each game.

Revenge is a dish best served in the playoffs!

by chriscream on Oct 8, 2009 10:07 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Keep in mind

If it wasn’t for our defense and special teams, it would have been a 2 td game.

by Haggardninja on Oct 8, 2009 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Meh

exactly, last week I would have voted No. But after that in the last game I saw some improvement like the types of runs and passing calls in passing situations. Although not enough impovement to warrant a Yes this week. Like at the end of the 1st half with over 1 minute remaining and multiple time outs remaining, and a unsatisfied 7-0 lead, it was a run. I didnt like that.
But after Atlanta game I’m sure I’ll make up my mind if its a Yes or No if there isnt a Maybe option.

by fortyniners on Oct 8, 2009 10:26 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I felt the same way at halftime

I felt we were once again being Knapped. Throw on 1st, run on 2nd. Run on 1st, throw on 2nd (unless we gain 4 yards then run again on 2nd). Then the lack of trying a 2-minute drill by opening with an obvious draw had me on edge. Looking at the game in full view he did open up the playbook and have more variety and aggressiveness in the 2nd half.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 8, 2009 12:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Where is the Eeh, he could better option?

That is my vote. However I do agree with your second paragraph Fooch. He did finally open his playbook up last week and when the ball was in Hills hands the offense had some life. The offensive line definitely is not executing how they should be.

by jonesin25 on Oct 8, 2009 10:34 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

How can anyone vote "yes" on this poll?

-5th from the bottom in pass yards per game
-5th from the bottom in total yards per game

For a team that announced to the world they will run, run, run, we have been middle-of-the-pack a quarter of the way through the season. Against the NFC West. It’s not going to get any easier, folks.

One positive is that we’re middle of the pack in time of possession…but if this team can’t approach an average offense, the defense may get tired and not perform to the best of their abilities.

The vote is not asking if you like winning, enjoy winning, or forgive a shiet offense for winning. Right now, it’s a no.

On 5/7, the best part of waking is up LOLDGERS in my cup.

by GameSix on Oct 8, 2009 10:37 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

You vote yes because we had better offensive numbers last year and no where near the results.

What do we want points and yards or w’s, I want wins like Sing wants winners.

"Optimist Prime"
Come along and ride the muthaship!

by rlott#42 on Oct 8, 2009 4:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know this is a 49er fan website and all, but you’re delusional if you approve of this offense based on our OVERALL performance against the worst division in football. We’re winning in spite of this offense. Yeah, of course I want points…but right now its the defense that’s putting up points. I know you’re not a fan of the 3-and-out, what positives could you take from this offense at this point in the season?

On 5/7, the best part of waking is up LOLDGERS in my cup.

by GameSix on Oct 9, 2009 8:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

time of possession

you nailed it. that’s this offense’s job. Defense- don’t lose field position, and if so…don’t let ‘em score.
We’ve got early 00’s baltimore written all over this team. Dilfer was hailed as a game manager that limited mistakes. let the guys on the other side of the field make the mistakes.
Coaches aren’t in the business of selling jerseys. If we’re to judge JRaye on his body of work, we look at our record, turnover diff, and TOP.
Our offense is an extension of our defense.
Jimmy Raye’s a genius. The players….they’re getting there.

by t p on Oct 9, 2009 6:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A ridiculous statement:

We’ve got early 00’s baltimore written all over this team.

We could possibly end up a similar team down the line. Jimmy Raye is no genius, certainly not at this juncture. I agree w/Fooch (I think) who said that the positive we can take from this game = slapped back into REALITY. T P my friend you were not living in reality, but welcome back! There’s punch/pie in the corner ;-)

On 5/7, the best part of waking is up LOLDGERS in my cup.

by GameSix on Oct 12, 2009 6:50 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I voted "no"

His play calling is just too predictable, at least to start the game:
1st down = run, 2nd down = run, 3rd down = pass

I know that’s not always true, but I would love to see the stats for running vs passing plays per down.

I DO think Raye has done an impressive job in in-game adjustments to opposing defenses, but he does not make our offense too dynamic at all.

by Run Dubz on Oct 8, 2009 10:46 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

'i voted yes

you can always say this or that about play calling but the truth is we are winning. ball control little turnovers and finding to get vernon in the mix is a great plus. we do need to improve but that will always be true and other than a fluke pass by farve we’d be 4-0 so what really is there to complain about.

by mdeasy on Oct 8, 2009 10:53 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I voted NO....However...

It’s not that his playbook is the problem, he just needs to open up the offense a little more and call plays that WIN the game. Right now it seems as if he’s calling plays not to lose. I’ll admit I’m still a little salty with him over the Vikings game, but overall I think he has the right plays in place to make us a decent offense. He just needs to be more aggressive and trust Hill.

by Jayhov on Oct 8, 2009 11:09 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I voted no

and I really don’t think anybody who voted as such should explain themselves.

by Ninjames on Oct 8, 2009 11:14 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

For those that voted YES

Why? Is it because we are doing enough NOT TO LOSE, or are you guys actually happy with the way the offense looks? I voted NO. I think we are winning despite the offense not because of them and that’s upsetting. We could be a DOMINATE team if we had just a little bit of offense.

by hudd07 on Oct 8, 2009 11:16 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

in D FENSE of a yes

offense and defense are one. one pick, or bad play early in the game, and the niners start all over, trying to establish field position- AND get behind in their mission of deflating the other team’s confidence. Our offense is part of our kick azz defense. I am beginning to think that J Ray is a genius who’s been waiting for THIS team to show his master intuition.

by t p on Oct 8, 2009 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

besides...

it’s easier to take a pick 20 yards vs. 60 yards for a score. Just ask P Dub.

by t p on Oct 8, 2009 11:29 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You can't put all...

… of the offensive woes on Raye’s playcalling. The offensive line has been severely underperforming, and outside of one game, the runningbacks have, too.

by sfgfan on Oct 8, 2009 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

the offense is terrible

I don’t think it’s the coordinators’ fault. I think he has to work with what he has, and his line can’t run block and it can’t pass block. Couple that with skill players who are no better than average (V. Davis and an injured Gore excepted).

You can make lemonade out of lemons, but you cannot make champagne.

FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.

by zenbitz on Oct 8, 2009 1:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You can make lemonade out of lemons, but you cannot make champagne.

So does that mean the 49ers offense is a little on the tart side?

by sfgfan on Oct 8, 2009 2:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL

Classic line

by bignerd on Oct 8, 2009 9:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Recepie for Lemonpagne

Mix one part Coffee, and one part Sheets. Bring this guy up already.

Although ATL’s run D sucks.

by goatfather on Oct 9, 2009 9:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Last week No...this week yes.

…and it’s not b/c of what we did v the rams.
I have been “watching” the game as a play by play ticker- so i haven’t really been able to assess the X and O’s, but what I have noticed is that we have been in control of the field position battle by the end of 1 or middle of 2. It’s the overall strategy of the team to play a conservative, clock eating game. JR’s been without his top guy (Gore) for half the season, and the offense didn’t (gulp) miss a beat.
Yes, our offense is not high powered by any means, but it’s a unit as part of an overall team. Seems to me like the coaching staff have masterminded more than just each individ. game, but have a “season plan”. Play slow, field position football. Bring the O Line along slowly with plenty of room to correct problems progressively, and don’t lose early season games. They’re on top of their division, this Defense is elite, and the Offense is getting better with each week.

So JR gets a ‘Yes’ based on the future value of present play calls.

by t p on Oct 8, 2009 11:25 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm with ya on that...

Last week was a qualified no however , the play calling though something less than dynamic was not the problem. If the team cannot execute the more or less solid game plan there is going to be disappointment. I think the fact that our time of possession is ok and limiting the 3 and out problems of the last number of years helps keep the defence sharp and rested.

by Natural Red on Oct 8, 2009 12:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't like the playcalling decisions,

I voted no because they are using poor pass blocking as an excuse to run more. The reason we have poor pass blocking is because of our vanilla playcalling. Obviously the middle of the line isn’t all world, but when every team knows you’re run-run-pass you better believe the end rushers are prepared to rush the passer as well as the DT’s. I don’t mind the plays that are called, I just wish there were more regular first down and second down passes called to move the extra man out of the box.

The thing that bothers me the most is that Shaun Hill is successful when given the ability to get into a groove i.e. not just throwing on 3rd and long (think of the drive against AZ where 8/9 plays were passes or against the Vikes in the 4th where he went 5/5 passing on the drive that gave us the lead). I feel like the team goes three and out (which happens a lot) mainly due to the fact that no rhythm is allowed to be established in the passing game and then passing on must pass situations with long gains necessary for first downs.

There now I've met the 75 word count. -pookeyguru

by moproblemz on Oct 8, 2009 11:59 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

You do know

that the niners pass 50% of the time. So there are just as many pass-run-pass and run-pass-pass as run-run-pass.

I do think that the issue is that the can’t move the ball on 1st and 2nd down and are forced into a lot of 3rd and longs. Which is obviously bad. But they do pass quite a bit on first and 2nd down… they just get pressured and sacked a lot.

FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.

by zenbitz on Oct 8, 2009 1:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Team

is responsible to execute the plays called. I like how safe it seems. I’d like to be close in every game, and be able to take time off the clock. I was thinking idiot when he went three and out against Minnesota at the end, but I was also thinking we couldn’t get the predictable 5-yard pass completed. When they get better, he’ll open up more. I’d be fine with a Ravens-type superbowl team. Just get the next ring…

Looking to put San Fran*six-o* here some time soon!

by dartdart on Oct 8, 2009 12:19 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yes on last week, no on prior games.

As Fooch pointed out, there was a lot more diversity in the play calling against the Rams, so I gave Jimmy an attaboy on that game and the fact that this offense won’t lose a game very often. But it sure won’t win any, either, and it all boils down to the OL play. If that doesn’t improve, neither will the offense. It’s that simple.

The Atlanta game presents an opportunity for offensive success, however. They’re weak against both the run and pass, but in order to keep the Falcon’s powerful offense off the field, the 9ers should run and use up the clock, hopefully turning the game into defensive struggle that favors SF. Even this OL should be able to open holes in Atlanta’s depleted D-line. I’m hoping for a Coffee breakout game and more of the VD magic in the end zone. I don’t think he 9er defense will have much trouble handling Turner, but Norwood might be another matter because the smaller, quicker backs appear to give the team some trouble, as in Seattle. If Ryan can be put in 3rd & long situations, our outstanding Dime package can handle any combination of receivers they care to put on the field and J. Smith and Parys will bring the pressure.

by MontanaPass on Oct 8, 2009 12:37 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

more options on needed

Hey Coach, Need for more creative but conservative play package -calling is needed for ball control, on third and short and inside the two yard line. They have too predictable and too conversative to be successful against eight in the box stagged defenses. They were stoped in Phx and Minnesota this year and at goal line in phx last year! Lost two of there.

For example, play action strategy with roll outs, belly series with toss or fakes and pass to blocking crossing tight ends or a POWER PACKAGE by placing a guard (Refrig in Chicago) at full back position and two more guards in place of wideouts! Use a package with Nate Davis / or QBs Battle/ M. Robinson as an option roll out runner/ passer on quick safe set pass routes.
Please note that one BIG difference would be that even if they did not make the gain --more clock time would be used to assist the defense. In Minnesota, that “may” have saved a victory! Hey Coach Raye, I am semi retired and a 49er fan since 1955, I will volunteer to assist you for a cup of coffee, lunch and be gone by dinner!

by ajp49er on Oct 8, 2009 12:50 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

if we remain conservative

i want to see better blocking schemes. I enjoyed the 3 wide outs where Morgan cought it at the scrimage than ran with the blockers. I wana see trick blocking too where the TE cuts in the back field and the runner goes where the TE was. Im not an expert but have seen some teams do some impressive things.

by dalien82 on Oct 8, 2009 1:00 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I voted yes but would rather have a grading system

A B C D F

After the the first 3 weeks I would have given him a D or D+

After last week I would give him a C or C+

Improved play calling and passing game..

by WC-Ninerhead on Oct 8, 2009 1:12 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I like this idea

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 8, 2009 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

me too

"Pat is still just scratching the surface." - Coach Singletary on LB Patrick Willis

by 49erLou on Oct 8, 2009 8:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

grading

We’ll do grading with quarterly stuff. But for week to week I just like seeing the general approval. There is certainly value in grades, but I like mixing it up a little.

by Fooch on Oct 10, 2009 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Changed from No to Yes this week.

I liked how he mixed it up more.. But I’m not 100% happy. There is still more we could do.. I hope our O Line woes are fixed.

by mountaindew77 on Oct 8, 2009 1:44 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

no vs yes

looks to me like the yes votes are a lot more thoughtful than the no’s…
to think that the defense will get tired of holding up the offense is a childish notion. that doesn’t happen in pro football. to call us predictable is a compliment when you look at our record.
If you want our team to air it out and leave our backs to protect the ball on stretch plays…so be it. you’re bound to see 50+ points on the board…but we’ll be on the losing end.

by t p on Oct 8, 2009 1:47 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

funny

to think that the defense will get tired of holding up the offense is a childish notion. that doesn’t happen in pro football.

On 5/7, the best part of waking is up LOLDGERS in my cup.

by GameSix on Oct 9, 2009 8:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Voted no

Even if the defense did get tired of holding up the offense, Singletary wouldn’t let that poison into the locker room. As long as they are winning, I’m sure they’re thankful and don’t have much to complain about.

I think the play calling was better for this game, however, I didn’t see any of the first half and from the sounds of it, I’m glad I didn’t. In order for me to give a “yes” approval, I’m going to have to see a very solid offense from Raye and I have yet to see that. I’m hoping he can get a “yes” vote out of me after the Atlanta game. I would like to see more passing out of Hill from him and it bothers me that all Hill has been through, the coaching staff STILL isn’t confident enough in him to make plays for this team. I will say it was nice to see run plays that weren’t straight up the middle though. That was an improvement.

by Haggardninja on Oct 8, 2009 3:53 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Voted YES

Last year we had the numbers and no wins. This offense has to execute better for them to open up the playbook. The 49ers want long drives to keep the D rested and that’s why you don’t see a lot of the 2 minute offense throughout the game. The O Line is playing like crap and the execution is the same across the board in the running game. Raye went with the toss and we almost fumbled in the Vikings game. Our offense needs to minimize turovers and learn to execute. I expect a lot after the bye week. Hill had to split reps with Smith and it is an apparent setback. This is our 7th OC in 7 yrs. At least he isn’t shoving the whole playbook down the throat of the offense. With the emergence of V Davis, we should all be patient to see how things turn out.

"Optimist Prime"
Come along and ride the muthaship!

by rlott#42 on Oct 8, 2009 4:15 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Finally

 I got some Rocky Road instead of plain old Vanilla ! Good ! Lets keep it up and open up the Offense. This weekend will say a lot about Raye. People tend to fall back to old habits, I hope not !

by LASVEGASNINER on Oct 10, 2009 6:11 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"We'll see them again in the playoffs." -- Coach Mike Singletary after a gut-wrenching week 3 loss to the Vikings.
Start posting about the 49ers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dave_small
Week 11 Prediction Games
Howtheyscoredcat_small
Official Alex Smith [Over]Reaction Thread: Bears Edition
Small
Alex Smith vs Aaron Rodgers(updated)
Small
The Titans/Niners play-by-play
Dave_small
Week 10 Prediction Games

Recent FanPosts

Montana_action_150-188_1__small
Top NCAA/NFL Prospects
Small
10 things the 49ers should not do
Italian_flag_small
Still think the Niners will reach the playoffs???
2305d0d49c908218_small
Packers fan with some questions
49ers_small
I have a feeling about this particular road game
Joe_and_bill_small
49ers QB - 2010
Small
Jimmy Raye - Ken Whisenhunt
Small
Niners Nation hits the big time
Shaun_hill_small
SINGLETARY WAS HIRED BECAUSE OF SHAUN HILL !!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SPONSORS


Head Ball Coach

Dave_small Fooch

Editors

Jerry_rice_small ProfessorBigelow

Assistant Coaches

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

Pixies_logo_small Florida Danny

M_12a62905a0324d2da2f43ddaf62c630f_small Ninjames

Duct_tape_bandit_small Josh from Hollywood

Crab_tree_small briandean

Moderators

Jackalope_card_small wjackalope