Niners Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

NFL Players Refusing To Play For Limbaugh. Your Thoughts?


The first players to come out in opposition of political shock jock Rush Limbaugh were Mathias Kiwanuka of the New York Giants and Bart Scott of the New York Jets.  Now this feeling it becoming more widespread in the league as even some current Rams including Stevan Jackson,  Leonard Little and Donnie Avery have come out in opposition of a possible Limbaugh takeover,  Jackson even going as far to say he will never play for the Rams

 

My question is this.  Do the players have a right to refuse to play for the Rams if Limbaugh does indeed purchase the team?  Can politics as divisive as it is play a roll in the NFL?  My thoughts are this.  I do not agree with what Limbaugh stands for and his ignorant remarks,  but in America isn't he entitled to them?  Also Dan Rooney of the Pittsburgh Steelers came out in full support of Obama during the 2008 campaign and is now ambassador to Ireland and a part of the Obama administration.  What would happen if say Big Ben came out against Rooney and refused to play for him because of his politics?

 

Now i completely understand where these African American athletes are coming from.  Limbaugh is a bigot and flat out racist.  This was proven during his MNF stint with ESPN when he questioned Mcnabb's intelligence and an African American's ability to play QB.  I am also happy about players coming out and taking a stand on issues that affect our society after being in the dark for so long.

 

Your thoughts?

Poll
Do NFL Players Have A Point In Refusing To Play For Rush Limbaugh?
Yes
114 votes
NO
41 votes

155 votes | Poll has closed

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Niners Nation's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Niners Nation's writers or editors.

1 recs  |  Comment 150 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Whatever

Yeah, Limbaugh shouldn’t have said what he did, but that doesn’t mean he’s a racist. Maybe he thought he saw something in the NFL culture that was valid. I personally think his point was off-base, but just because he thought the NFL wants black QBs to succeed doesn’t mean he’s a racist. It’s rather disgusting that in society today we can’t really discuss things like this without being called a racist.

And, if we’re going to call Limbaugh a racist, then by the same merits McNabb should be labeled a racist as well:

“There’s not that many African-American quarterbacks, so we have to do a little bit extra,” McNabb said.

McNabb also said: "I pass for 300 yards, our team wins by seven, [it’s] ‘Ah, he could’ve made this throw. They would have scored if he did this.’ "

McNabb said that’s not always the case for white quarterbacks like Peyton Manning and Carson Palmer.

“Let me start by saying I love those guys,” McNabb said. “But they don’t get criticized as much as we do. They don’t.”

Isn’t that basically the exact same type of comment as Limbaugh, except arguing the other side?

Maybe these players ought to refuse to play with McNabb?

STEVE HOLM! refuses to be the odd man out.

by UnleashTheGore on Oct 9, 2009 3:30 PM PDT reply actions   2 recs

I think you're missing the definition of racist

Not arguing whether or not Limbaugh is, but McNabb’s statement was not. Had he said black QBs were superior, that would be racist.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 9, 2009 4:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My point is that neither of them are racist. I’m saying that if we’re going to call Rush a racist, then by those same standards we should call McNabb a racist.

STEVE HOLM! refuses to be the odd man out.

by UnleashTheGore on Oct 12, 2009 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Racist? Maybe

But is he not right? What Limbaugh said was so far fetched and outlandish, what Mcnabb said was the truth

Playoffs? Playoffs? Playoffs? Your Talking about Playoffs? Yes Sir I am!!!!!!!!!!!

by nocal81 on Oct 9, 2009 6:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Was he right?

No I don’t think so. You think black QB’s get judged unfairly? I think that used to be the case but it’s not anymore.

by Brendan Scolari on Oct 9, 2009 7:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I Think That

They are put under a larger microscope coming out of college. Do i think that they are judged unfairly? Probably not in these times, but when Mcnabb was drafted. Maybe

"I Would Call It Futbal, but we have the nukes"

by nocal81 on Oct 9, 2009 7:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe when he was drafted

But it seems like a non-issue anymore. There are lots of black QB’s and black coaches in the league now and I don’t think many people have any problem with it at all.

by Brendan Scolari on Oct 9, 2009 7:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I Would Tend To Agree With You On This

But being a white man i really don’t have the experience necessary to see where he is coming from or what he has gone through or what he perceives to be true.

"I Would Call It Futbal, but we have the nukes"

by nocal81 on Oct 9, 2009 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

McNabb is full of crap

He should have done just a little bit of digging before making a comment like that. He seems to have forgotten that our very own Steve Young was heavily criticized for being a QB that was a scrambling QB that didn’t do well in the passing game.

McNabb is held in very high esteem in the national media. He probably gets too bent out of shape from listening to the Philly media, who eats up people who struggle in the least bit. Just because your hometown criticizes you doesn’t mean the rest of the country thinks you are a terrible QB, even much less so because you are black.

White and black QBs are criticized alike. He needs to go buy some butt cream and get over it.

STEVE HOLM! refuses to be the odd man out.

by UnleashTheGore on Oct 12, 2009 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

players refuse to play if they dont get paid

so I don’t see why they couldn’t refuse if they wanted to.

Go 49ers

by iaalexeeff on Oct 9, 2009 3:40 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Players play for the fans

And there are a large amount of fans that agree with Rush Limbaugh. This just goes to show how stupid some players in the NFL are.

This is as stupid as leaving the country because Obama is president. I only have to do that if he succeeds… : )

by DrDoom on Oct 9, 2009 3:43 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

players don.t play for fans

no player has gotten a check signed by a fan. yeah they want to win but not for the fans. they as a group put themselves through a lot to stay in this sport. they show love to fans after wins but how many times are fans brought up after a loss.

"Optimist Prime"
Come along and ride the muthaship!

by rlott#42 on Oct 9, 2009 4:29 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe not

But fans are ultimately the reason they are able to play. The revenue comes from us, so teams make decisions in many cases based on the fans.

by niners84 on Oct 10, 2009 1:33 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

players don.t play for fans

Fans are the consumers of the players’ product. So, yes they ARE the customer, and in a sense the customer DOES write the check.

Thing A

by sam23 on Oct 10, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

But Like In Every Entity

The “worker”, “consumer” and “customer” have the right to refuse service and/or to work or play for a certain company/manager. Just like when the consumer walks around a mall they have options in terms of purchasing right? If i would rather not shop at Safeway then i won’t!! If i prefer Trader Joe’s i have every right to avoid the afforementioned for the latter.

"I Would Call It Futbal, but we have the nukes"

by nocal81 on Oct 10, 2009 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

not quite sure how that relates to my point, but

sure the consumer and customer are basically the same as in any other business, but because the players sign work contracts the role of the “worker” is a bit different that the role we normally think of.

Thing A

by sam23 on Oct 11, 2009 2:38 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dr. Doom – please go ahead and leave now.

by zuma420 on Oct 11, 2009 6:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well.

I think the sentiment is admirable, but I suspect no one would actually do that if it came down to it. Besides, Rush Limbaugh is the least of the reasons not to play for the Rams.

by Perrinbar on Oct 9, 2009 3:47 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Let's start a list...
Besides, Rush Limbaugh is the least of the reasons not to play for the Rams.

1) The terrible helmets
2) Their terrible QB(s)
3) Their terrible OL
4) Their terrible dome
5) The team just sucks, dude.

STEVE HOLM! refuses to be the odd man out.

by UnleashTheGore on Oct 9, 2009 3:51 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Two words. Richie Incognito. That guy is a tool-box.

by Perrinbar on Oct 9, 2009 3:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You forgot

6) They came from LA

Playoffs??? Playoffs??? We're baaaaack!!!

by corvette49rdave on Oct 9, 2009 5:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Keeping politics out of NFL football is important.

I don’t care if it’s Rush Limbaugh or Bill Clinton or Hitler or Stalin. There is no place for politics in football. Period. Politics is inherently divisive and would contaminate the NFL’s extremely successful product. No one who will inject politics into football should be allowed to be an owner, majority or minority. The problem with Rush isn’t his politics, it’s his proven inability to keep his politics separate from football. Allowing him to become an owner would be a big mistake.

by MontanaPass on Oct 9, 2009 3:50 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

You're on point

I would say that it’s his inability to keep politics separate from himself. Who he is has been built completely by political beliefs and subsequent behavior. The two are inseperable. It’s like inviting a former President to something; no matter how much you down play it, the guy is a former sitting president. Fortunately the league owners would never approve this because as a group they’re pretty conservative by nature and do not want the negative publicity to reign down upon their product. In the end, the one belief they all share with the players is making money. Having Limbaugh present would likely hurt that.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 9, 2009 4:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yep

well said

by Drew K on Oct 9, 2009 5:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Limbaugh is so republican i bet he wouldn’t even be able to consider bipartisanship for the Rams. He’d only play the players who are republican lol

by StevenC on Oct 10, 2009 6:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

But In All Fareness

We do live in America. But last time i checked the NFL was a private organization right? Their assets are not traded on wall street right? So they can do whatever they like in terms of accepting or denying a ownership change

Playoffs? Playoffs? Playoffs? Your Talking about Playoffs? Yes Sir I am!!!!!!!!!!!

by nocal81 on Oct 9, 2009 6:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yep - and they won't allow it

The NFL does not want its produce or message upstaged by non-football incidents. As for Rush, he’s already won. If he becomes an owner, he has a new platform. If he’s denied, he can martyr himself and blame various groups, further ing his divisive cause. If I’m Goodell, I don’t want anyone from either political extreme to become part of my league.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 9, 2009 6:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

"AMER-ICA...

[Site Decorum] YA! Here to save the [site decorum]-ing wOorld!"

Forget Politics, we need to get beer ads followed by car commercials off the air…Or how about “E.D” talked about as a ‘medical condition’ then after the commercials, a cut-away to the half-dressed cheerleaders! What kind of messages are we sending to children about drunk driving, appropriate and acceptable treatment towards women, or getting off our [site decorum]es so we’re not taking Prylosec before we are 30 years old.

YES… Are we really this serious about Rush Limbaugh when the product we call the NFL is already so saturated w/ crap? I love my Niners, and I love seeing really big really fast guys beat the crap outa one another, but c’mon people.

I don’t agree w/ him one iota, but lets be real, we as fans are far more complacent with so much absolute garbage spewed out on a regular basis, that it seems a lil ridiculous to get up in arms about RUSH.

Chris Cohan- YOU'RE FIRED!

by bonbrillio on Oct 10, 2009 5:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

um ...
Or how about "E.D" talked about as a ‘medical condition’ then after the commercials, a cut-away to the half-dressed cheerleaders! What kind of messages are we sending to children …


So … yeah …

Limbaugh owning the Rams or not owning the Rams, personally I think the more of these hotties they cut the screen away to the better.

"We’ll see them again in the playoffs." - Mike Singletary, right after the Week 3 Minnesota game

by Persiflage on Oct 10, 2009 8:10 PM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

Children?

Oh, yeah children LOVE watching football….

Face it, most people that watch football are overweight, drunk, middle-aged, men.
I don’t mind the stupid commercials…I don’t fall into the above category so I really don’t care.

You sound like those people that complain about the viagra ads during golf.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

by chikmagnet_565 on Oct 10, 2009 9:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, Nah, not really.

I’m just kinda tired of the advertising, not enough to be one of

those people that complain about the viagra ads during golf.
well, mainly because I don’t watch Golf, but also I don’t really care all that much.

I do think people kind of miss the point a lot of times, if you know what I mean, as far as what issues get glossed over, but they are actually the ones people ought to care about. As far as Rush Limbaugh is concerned, i think he’s an idiot, but I don’t pay that much mind to him (aint worth the effort getting all worked up).

I don’t argue w/ you that most people who watch are drunk, middle-aged men… but some of those drunk middle aged men who also have kids of their own often wonder why all their efforts to be a good parent some how go out the window when father and son want to watch a 49er game together.

I’m not a parent, I’m 25, but I at least got an opinion about the NFL that does more than scratch the surface. And yes, children DO love watching football.

Chris Cohan- YOU'RE FIRED!

by bonbrillio on Oct 10, 2009 9:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My brother and cousins all beg to differ

Of all of the kids under 7 that I know, NONE can sit through a game of football.
They don’t understand it and get pissed because it is stopped too often.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

by chikmagnet_565 on Oct 11, 2009 7:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I suppose then you must be right,

and your brother and cousins are the authorities on the matter. And they’re probably not 49er fans… that’s ok.

I do know that when I was 7 I was watching football, as were my 7 year old friends.

Chris Cohan- YOU'RE FIRED!

by bonbrillio on Oct 11, 2009 7:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's just me dude

I NEVER said that the people that I know were the only people in the world.
Just giving my personal experiences.

Geez…..

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

by chikmagnet_565 on Oct 11, 2009 8:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

well I dont think I’d go so far as to say “….i dont care if its Hitler.” But as far as I know Limbaugh hasn’t committed genocide.

Thing A

by sam23 on Oct 10, 2009 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Genocide Of The Brain

You have to admit that was funny

"I Would Call It Futbal, but we have the nukes"

by nocal81 on Oct 10, 2009 3:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I guess I would have a problem if my boss were a murderer a major importer of slave labor,

but just some guy who voices his political opinions on the radio? No problem whatsoever. How do these players know that their owner isn’t a big Rush supporter as it is?

by LantermanC on Oct 9, 2009 3:56 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm sure Lamar Hunt in KC probably is.

As he is active in GOP politics. But he doesn’t inject his politics into football and doesn’t make divisive public statements. Rush has already proven he can’t keep his politics separate from football.

by MontanaPass on Oct 9, 2009 4:05 PM PDT up reply actions   2 recs

+1

You have been DFiBrillated.

by Dubs fan in Boston on Oct 10, 2009 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rush doesn't engage in politics

He engages in hatred and masks it behind politics. It’s not a Republican issue because there are plenty of them in the NFL. I could see why players would refuse to play for his team. He made his money belittling the cultures they have come from, yes that includes Jared Allen and his mullet is a lifestyle, not a hair cut.

by bignerd on Oct 9, 2009 4:03 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

You know nothing

Don’t try to start a war here. You won’t win. Rush is cool and you probably know people that agree with him 100% and don’t even know it. Disagree if you want, but don’t spread hatred. He certainly isn’t.

by DrDoom on Oct 9, 2009 4:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Please

He got his start in my home town. He used to cater to the suburban areas of Sacramento by harshly ripping on the poorer areas for simply being poor. If the check is bigger than the subsequent heat than he’ll lace into anyone.

I live in an community that’s probably 85% die hard Rush supporters. It’s painfully obvious and apparent why they enjoy Rush.

Rush choose his veil profession. He’s certainly no better or nor worse than his contemporaries. However it’s a job that’s going to push you outside several social circles because it offends a good number of people.

by bignerd on Oct 9, 2009 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

I think we should all heed this call to keep this discussion civil

In now way did i attempt to create a political thread with divisive issues, my attempt was to gauge what other people were thinking

Playoffs? Playoffs? Playoffs? Your Talking about Playoffs? Yes Sir I am!!!!!!!!!!!

by nocal81 on Oct 9, 2009 6:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

rec

turn it green

"Pat is still just scratching the surface." - Coach Singletary on LB Patrick Willis

by 49erLou on Oct 10, 2009 12:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

?

Chris Cohan- YOU'RE FIRED!

by bonbrillio on Oct 10, 2009 5:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's the original hulk (movie) ?

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

by chikmagnet_565 on Oct 10, 2009 9:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah Okay

His incitement of the fringe right doesn’t breed hatred? I mean are you serious? Look i am not a democrat or a republican but i call it like i see it. Weather it comes from the left or the right. He is a bigoted racist that incites hatred in America

Playoffs? Playoffs? Playoffs? Your Talking about Playoffs? Yes Sir I am!!!!!!!!!!!

by nocal81 on Oct 9, 2009 6:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He is a bigoted racist that incites hatred in America

How is he a “bigoted racist that incites hatred”?

by Brendan Scolari on Oct 9, 2009 7:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

From

his comments about Mcnabb to him talking about how blacks dance in clubs in the Bronx. The list goes on and on man. Wish you could see that

"I Would Call It Futbal, but we have the nukes"

by nocal81 on Oct 9, 2009 7:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

please stop

This is not what this thread is supposed to be about. Last warning to everybody.

by Fooch on Oct 9, 2009 7:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry

I will stop with the politics of it.

"I Would Call It Futbal, but we have the nukes"

by nocal81 on Oct 9, 2009 7:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rush Limbaugh

Is FAT. There, I said it. Please don’t everyone get mad at me all at once.

Chris Cohan- YOU'RE FIRED!

by bonbrillio on Oct 10, 2009 9:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

All Rush does every second of every day is spew hatred. It’s pretty sad you can’t see that.

by zuma420 on Oct 11, 2009 6:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I won't debate you because NN isn't supposed to be about political talk

But I think your first sentence is totally unneccesary. Please leave it out, you can express your opinion without being so devisive. I have lots of strong political beliefs too but I don’t say them here.

by Brendan Scolari on Oct 9, 2009 5:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wouldn’t want to work for Rush (the dude… working for the band would be teh awesomes!!!)
Athletes have very weirdly restricted employment rights (contracts, drafts, etc.)… they can’t just quit and work for a different team (company) like you or I.

They have two choices – go on strike or wait for free agency.

FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.

by zenbitz on Oct 9, 2009 4:03 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I think...

… this thread is bordering the point of no return in terms of politics on the blog. Preemptive strike is imminent!

by sfgfan on Oct 9, 2009 4:12 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

See Above.

Everyone.

Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.

by howtheyscored on Oct 9, 2009 4:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is stupid

"Bar None!" - William Floyd

by maveric_87 on Oct 9, 2009 4:14 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't listen to Limbaugh much and find him tedious...

But the soap opera that is the NFL and other pro and collage sports is as difficult to listen to if not more. I find the sports media spends way too much time micro analizing everything from who got a DUI to who a player is sleeping with. Why don’t players do what their being paid for and leave the drivel out of it.

by Natural Red on Oct 9, 2009 4:16 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Right...

Because you’ve probably never had a disagreement with a co-worker, boss, or ex-friend?

by sfgfan on Oct 9, 2009 4:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+reply, please.

Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.

by howtheyscored on Oct 9, 2009 4:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why don’t players do what their being paid for and leave the drivel out of it.

You say this as if players are expected to be robots just because they’re getting paid to do what they do. There are plenty of people in the country (and world) that get into fights with their bosses, co-workers, and ex-friends, which is most of what NFL “drama” boils down to. I don’t understand why athletes should be expected to act differently than a normal person would. If you disagree with a person or co-worker, you have every right to disagree with them as long as you’re willing to face the consequences of doing so. To say they should just “do what they’re being paid to do” implies it’s not their right to.

by sfgfan on Oct 9, 2009 4:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just as Limbaugh has his right to speak these players have a right to sit.

If they feel like putting their career in jeopardy because they don’t want said owner its their choice. Its their body being beatin up not ours. This is a players choice. If any player believed in their own mind to make a decision about their career how could tht be a problem? Personally I think Limbaugh justs regurgitates useless rhetoric and has made his money saying what a certain group of people wanna hear. More power to him, I wouldn’t play for him either but its not my decision. The NFŁ is 75 percent afr american, and it may be a problem for him. The league has to consider the issues that would occur and a lot of players will be pissed if he does get the team.

"Optimist Prime"
Come along and ride the muthaship!

by rlott#42 on Oct 9, 2009 4:42 PM PDT via mobile reply actions   0 recs

Treading in dangerous waters

If I was Limbaugh, I’d reconsider the investment if he’s already catching this much flack for the players on the team

by Drew K on Oct 9, 2009 4:46 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Politics

This FanPost has certainly teetered, but I do think the general idea behind the topic is worthy of discussion. The players obviously have their reasons, but I’d imagine even just a few minutes of research would reveal some interesting political connections with NFL owners.

by Fooch on Oct 9, 2009 4:47 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Right… but those owners aren’t on national radio on a daily basis spewing at the mouth. Rush is, and it’s going to bother people.

by zuma420 on Oct 11, 2009 6:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Difference between beliefs and behavior

I don’t see the problem as Rush’s political beliefs. It’s his behavior in spreading those beliefs, especially as they are taken as being bigoted toward people. Jerry Jones opened his stadium with perhaps the least popular President in American history (W Bush) flipping the coin. No Cowboys player blasted Jones because it’s not about politics it’s about behavior. Most NFL owners are likely Republican. No one cares, just like no one cares about their religious beliefs, cultural heritage, sexual orientation, gender or marriage status.
But if one of these owners spent their time in public speaking poorly of anyone from these groups, they may find sponsors unwilling to align with them and players unwilling to work for them.

It’s worth noting with Rooney that he is a Republican. His support for Obama was noted for that reason. Who he chose to support is not an issue. Had he publicly insluted a segment of the American public because of his voting choice, that would likely earn him a great deal of criticism and it would have been deserved.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 9, 2009 4:48 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I Agree

On the exterior i have an issue with both the far left and far right. But this isn’t about politics nor should it be. After all this isn’t a political blog site. But i do think it’s worth having the conversation simply due to Limbaugh’s outlandish behavior

Playoffs? Playoffs? Playoffs? Your Talking about Playoffs? Yes Sir I am!!!!!!!!!!!

by nocal81 on Oct 9, 2009 6:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The fact that players have commented makes it a valid question

That some people here are bothered and/or uncomfortable talking about it why is would be bad for the league. I would imagine most NFL players care more about a teammates alma mater than political opinions so for them to speak out about this shows that it hit home.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 9, 2009 7:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Could we get this fanpost deleted please?

I find some of the remarks in this thread extremely offensive. Whatever your opinion of Rush we don’t need the “Rush is a bigot and a racist” comments and if we’re not going to talk politics these statements have absolutely no relation to football. Why do we need to know that nocal81 thinks Rush is a racist? How does that relate to the discussion?

by Brendan Scolari on Oct 9, 2009 5:01 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Except for the fact that players speaking out against Rush’s ownership object because they believe he is a racist and bigot. It’s kind of hard to take the social and political commentary out of the discussion when the issue with Rush is his track record with social and political commentary.

by bignerd on Oct 9, 2009 5:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's fine

But this isn’t:

Limbaugh is a bigot and flat out racist.

Why does nocal need to say this? It’s an opinion and I’m sure there are people here that like Rush. It’s the equivalent of me saying I don’t think President (insert name here) should flip the coin at the Superbowl because he’s a big/racist/whatever, there’s no place for that.

by Brendan Scolari on Oct 9, 2009 5:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

One difference

A sitting President was elected, a commentator represents an unknown (and usually small but vocal) percentage of the populace. All presidents throw out first ptiches and flip coins; comes with the job. They also are supposed to protect all Americans; commentators and private citizens have not such duty and are judged differently

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 9, 2009 5:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

True

Although in a sense Rush was “elected” in that he’s got one of the most popular radio shows out there. He’s obviously got a lot of support and I don’t think those kind of comments are necessary. I could spout my beliefs about a lot of famous Democratic supporters, but no one will change their opinion because of it and it will be offensive to many people so why do it?

by Brendan Scolari on Oct 9, 2009 5:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

But I bet even people with different political/social beliefs than you

Would agree that if someone from the political left, who had a history of incendiary statements that offended large segments of the populace, is undeserving of being an NFL owner. There would be players who would state their desire to not work for that person and they toow ould be within their rights. What people believe is theirs to own. How they choose to share and implement those beliefs can create backlash that they must own.

I would disagree about Rush being elected. Popularity on the radio or even TV is still a small subset of the population. There are singers more famous and popular but it doesn’t mean they know what they’re talking about. Giving people in media/pop culture too much authority is likely where a small amount of the backlash to Rush comes from.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 9, 2009 5:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Would agree that if someone from the political left, who had a history of incendiary statements that offended large segments of the populace, is undeserving of being an NFL owner.

Really? I would disagree, some of our country’s highest political leaders have a history of doing just that and people don’t seem to mind. I think people disagree with Rush’s politics and find him hateful/bigoted/whatever, so they don’t approve. But were someone from their side of the spectrum to do the same they wouldn’t have a problem.

by Brendan Scolari on Oct 9, 2009 5:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

alright....

time to call it a day on this. This is quickly getting out of hand. I’d prefer to not delete the FanPost, but I’m starting to think it’d just be easier that way.

by Fooch on Oct 9, 2009 5:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Please delete

I’m about to puke. Many a financial message board has been destroyed by jackasses from both sides of politics.

No one is going to change anyone else’s mind.

The future ain't what it used to be. Go Niners!

by riderless on Oct 11, 2009 9:47 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Delete?

Fooch i do respect you for your insight and for creating this forum. It is one of the most intelligent football blog sites i have ever seen

Though it is well within your right to censor what we say and what topics are brought up on this site, i believe it would be foolish to stifle this conversation on here. Simply because it isn’t 100 percent about football, but in reality it have everything to do with what we as American’s hold dear. And by these players stepping up for their beliefs and abandoning the long history if quite appeasement they have brought it to the forefront of the national conversation and in doing so they have brought it to the consciencness of the average NFL fan. To delete this, to stifle this conversation and to censor this conversation would fly in the face of what they players and our society is attempting to do as a whole.

"I Would Call It Futbal, but we have the nukes"

by nocal81 on Oct 10, 2009 3:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not really

If you want to argue with someone else about this you can do it privately…..?

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

by chikmagnet_565 on Oct 10, 2009 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

 I agree. There is a left wing biase in the media today.

by 49erSalvatrucha on Oct 9, 2009 6:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Way off topic

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 9, 2009 6:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

which is basically what you’re doing – you agree with Rush and his “beliefs” so you don’t like to see those beliefs lambasted. Stephen Jackson disagrees with Rush’s beliefs, and has publicly stated that he wouldn’t play for the man if he owned the team.

by zuma420 on Oct 11, 2009 6:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

this is exactly why it would be a bad idea for the league.

Perception is everything in the public eye. NFL can’t avoid issues with him being approved as an owner. In todays society it won’t work, plus who’s to say Limbaugh wouldn’t use the team to further voice his opinion. He will bring politics where it is not needed. Seventy five percent of the players in this league reepresents the peoploe he bashes. I wouldn’t trust him to pay players accordingly.

"Optimist Prime"
Come along and ride the muthaship!

by rlott#42 on Oct 9, 2009 5:53 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Seventy five percent of the players in this league reepresents the peoploe he bashes. I wouldn’t trust him to pay players accordingly.

That is just complete and utter nonsense. Please point to all the incidents where he “bashes” black people.

by Brendan Scolari on Oct 9, 2009 6:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

since im using mobile im nt being very specific

that 75 percent isn’t blks. 75 percent of the league come from lower income families and we know how he feels about them. I apolgize for nt being clear

"Optimist Prime"
Come along and ride the muthaship!

by rlott#42 on Oct 9, 2009 6:46 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, my mistake then

I thought you were referring to how most players in the league are black, my bad.Regardless, I don’t think he “bashes” poor people either.

by Brendan Scolari on Oct 9, 2009 7:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol…. and you automatically thought it was “because they’re black” - no racism exists in his programming, though, right?

by zuma420 on Oct 11, 2009 6:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

here you are

 "Look, let me put it to you this way: The NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it."

 “I mean, let’s face it, we didn’t have slavery in this country for over 100 years because it was a bad thing. Quite the opposite: Slavery built the South. I’m not saying we should bring it back. I’m just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer after dark.”

http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/sports/columnists.nsf/bryanburwell/story/E196145D80764B2F86257648000EF26B?OpenDocument

by bakoninerfan on Oct 10, 2009 1:23 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

rec’d. Thank you thank you thank you

by zuma420 on Oct 11, 2009 6:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

To be fair

The payment issue would not be a factor as I believe the salary cap has both a floor and ceiling. Owners would have to pay players as any business person would want to win and thus turn a profit; well, should want to. The Brown’s in Cincy and Bidwill in AZ make you wonder how they make any profit.

Your earlier points are spot on and why the league won’t allow it. You can’t give a person a platform to push their social/political views on others and he would be a threat to do that. They don’t care if owners are jerks but they can not afford non-football distractions. Having a potential large percentage of players speak out would only further hurt the product and cause the league to unwillingly end up in the culture war, a place it need not be.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 9, 2009 6:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Having a potential large percentage of players speak out would only further hurt the product and cause the league to unwillingly end up in the culture war, a place it need not be.

This is why I don’t see it happening.

by Brendan Scolari on Oct 9, 2009 7:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

How Exactly Did This Destroy the NFL in the 1970's

That’s right it didn’t. You have people like Joe Green Speak out against politicians and all it showed was that athletes don’t ignore the society in which they exist

"I Would Call It Futbal, but we have the nukes"

by nocal81 on Oct 9, 2009 7:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Huh?

How is that relevant to what I said?

by Brendan Scolari on Oct 9, 2009 7:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You Couldn't Be More Wrong

Why exactly are these players refusing to play for him? It has nothing to do with his politics but rather his actions and his words.

Playoffs? Playoffs? Playoffs? Your Talking about Playoffs? Yes Sir I am!!!!!!!!!!!

by nocal81 on Oct 9, 2009 7:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It has everything to do with his politics

If he was beligerant but had the same views as the players who don’t like him you think they would still refuse to play for him?

by Brendan Scolari on Oct 9, 2009 7:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Honestly?

We live in America and they have every right to refuse to play for anyone. Just like we have any right to refuse to work for anyone. The question was “do they have a point”

"I Would Call It Futbal, but we have the nukes"

by nocal81 on Oct 9, 2009 7:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know they have every right

My point is that the reason they are doing so is because they don’t believe what Rush believes in.

by Brendan Scolari on Oct 9, 2009 7:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I Think It's More

About what he has said and what he has done more then what he believes in.

But to play devil’s advocate for a second. What if big Ben decided he didn’t want to play for the Steers because Dan Rooney was a major Obama supporter? and is actually ambassador to Ireland

"I Would Call It Futbal, but we have the nukes"

by nocal81 on Oct 9, 2009 7:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd think that was pretty stupid

But he has every right too if he wants.

by Brendan Scolari on Oct 9, 2009 7:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

lol… no, they don’t believe in racism

by zuma420 on Oct 11, 2009 6:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why wouldn't any worker

have the right to choose their employer? If I know that my company is being bought out by an owner whom I do not like, I should be able to put in my notice and go work for someone else.

Alaska is a state, dammit! Can I get a Niner game on TV up here?

by kinglouie33 on Oct 9, 2009 6:12 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

makes sense

The players signed a contract to play for a certain team and it’s owner.

I don’t know if the contracts could be voided (because I have never seen an NFL player’s contract)…..

The players could go on strike, though.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

by chikmagnet_565 on Oct 9, 2009 6:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Contracts are voided by the teams all the time

Players get released, get traded, get demoted to practice squad, etc. Often without the player’s consent.

by smileyman on Oct 10, 2009 12:13 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

But could they be voided if a new owner steps in?

By the players?

Even if the players couldn’t get out of the contracts they would just play out their deals and leave in FA.

The team would become the worst team in the history of the NFL.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

by chikmagnet_565 on Oct 10, 2009 8:27 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He’s going to buy the rams I don’t have a problem with it. People don’t have a problem with his beliefs its how he delivers the message gets people a little upset. I don’t think Rush is a racist either and im latino so plz don’t pull the bs race card very low class people. Just learn to respect other peoples view points.

by 49erSalvatrucha on Oct 9, 2009 6:23 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Rush said this:

 "I mean, let’s face it, we didn’t have slavery in this country for over 100 years because it was a bad thing. Quite the opposite: Slavery built the South. I’m not saying we should bring it back. I’m just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer after dark."

still not a racist?

by zuma420 on Oct 11, 2009 6:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

from Wikiquote
These quotations are currently being disputed because the author of the book did not provide air dates for the original source material quoted.

"We’ll see them again in the playoffs." - Mike Singletary, right after the Week 3 Minnesota game

by Persiflage on Oct 11, 2009 7:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't even know who this Rush fella is.

I stay out of politics….

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

by chikmagnet_565 on Oct 9, 2009 6:25 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

If Rush becomes owner

then the Rams will become even worse. A lot of their good players would bolt right when they hit free agency. This would definitely help the Niners because they wouldn’t even have to think about the Rams having a shot at the division. Like the Rams do now lol.

by duballers23 on Oct 9, 2009 6:28 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

probably not the place for this but FOOCH

I was thinking of posting about putting ourselves in Crabtree’s shoes and have each individua say how they’d respond to their own comments if they were crabs reading their ownposts or others. kinda point out what theyveheard from others as well. I would but im driving to girltown texas I mean dallas and the laptop isn’t with……just a thougt

"Optimist Prime"
Come along and ride the muthaship!

by rlott#42 on Oct 9, 2009 6:50 PM PDT via mobile reply actions   0 recs

As a Owner

I love to see him as an owner and then make comments about other teams and players. Then when the league fines him for those comments and he makes more comment about the league. Just to get kick out. j/k lol That would be awesome! He gets paid to start issues and get people upset. In the box you can only be seen and not heard! He needs to stay on the radio and out of the real business of professional sports.

Revenge is a dish best served in the playoffs!

by chriscream on Oct 9, 2009 6:54 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

he may love that

could make him more popular

"Optimist Prime"
Come along and ride the muthaship!

by rlott#42 on Oct 9, 2009 7:13 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

It's their choice

If they decided not to play…
yes, they wouldn’t get paid
yes, they could possibly be sued
and yes, they could hurt or end their careers.

But, yes, there are a handful of players that would do this and that’s more than enough to make a statement.

I’m not trying to enter into polititcs here, but understand that if someone as polarizing as Rush Limbaugh owns a team, politics WILL enter into football. If you think that it’d be bad on this website, holy poop stains, it’d be terrible in the NFL.

Baseball players are smarter than football players. How often do you see a baseball team penalized for too many men on the field? - Jim Bouton

by Beaushek on Oct 9, 2009 7:53 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

Agreed

And it would be even worse as far as free agency goes. Every player has a right to refuse to sign for the Rams for whatever reason they can come up with. That’s certainly a problem on its own. So not only would some of the players on the roster hate him, he’d have trouble attracting free agents to the team due to reasons not related to football. And it could even get polarizing enough to the point where players that do choose to sign for him are instantly labeled as someone who supports his views, so that on its own might be a deterrent to signing for the Rams.

It’s not so much Rush’s politics but the fact that Rush is a polarizing figure. The same concerns would apply for a potential owner that was ultra-liberal enough to anger a lot of players as well.

by jveezy on Oct 9, 2009 8:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Just for “holy poop stains” man that is epic.

On an unrelated and completely non political note. Anyone heard the joke Olbermenn made about Limbaugh? “He is a huge grinded up bag of jackass” LOL i have used that on multiple occasions, most recently refering to Tony Romo lol. It’s a great dig on someone and is funny as HE double hockey sticks.

"I Would Call It Futbal, but we have the nukes"

by nocal81 on Oct 10, 2009 12:20 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Poor Rams

Haven’t they been through enough?

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

by chikmagnet_565 on Oct 9, 2009 10:07 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

If Rush has the dough, let him buy a team

If the NBA survived Mark Cuban, the NFL can survive Rush.

Why do San Francisco teams insist on having terrible offenses? Frank Gore and Pablo Sandoval can't do it all.

by GiantPain on Oct 9, 2009 10:56 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Marge Schott owned the Reds and had a public and favorable opinion of Hitler, yet I don’t recall any players ever refusing to play for her or the Reds. I think it speaks volumes of how divisive our society has become that players would now threaten to not play for an owner who’s only crime appears to be a right wing bias. It seems to me that it would be any player’s prerogative to not sign with the Rams in free agency for any reason including the owner’s political beliefs. But it seems absurd to me that any player would refuse to honor their current contracts simply because of the owner’s right wing views. If Limbaugh bought the team and cut ties with all players with left wing views would it not seem outrageous? If quality players refuse to come to the Rams after Limbaugh buys the team and the Rams’ on field play suffers its Limbaugh’s problem, but there’s no excuse for this kind of whining and, as this thread proves, it only breeds even more divisiveness.

Thing A

by sam23 on Oct 10, 2009 12:48 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Perhaps it speaks well of our society

That we our now in a more enlightened and empowered time that players (and fans?) have more leverage than before. I’d like to think that an owner like Schott, who’s beliefs I always found repugnant, would now not be confirmed by fellow owners. Players certainly have more leverage than 20 years ago. Fans are certainly more informed (perhaps too informed) about CEOs, players, etc. That people can speak out against beliefs and behavior that they find incendiary and divisive is a good thing IMO.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 10, 2009 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

huh? Dave Parker refused to play for her, as did a number of Jew players… she was eventually ran out of the game.

by zuma420 on Oct 11, 2009 7:02 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Why do we care?

How many people have been announced as buying teams? Is this our team? What control do we have over it? Odds are the group is going to fail in their bid for many reasons. Yes it’s quite understandable an employee not wanting to work for a certain employer. The odds of this happening are probably slim to none and this is being blown way out of proportion. If I was looking for a job I would not choose to work for Rush Limbaugh for numerous reasons. And any player any human being has a right to refuse to play (or work in any shape or form) for a group or individual who they find circumspect. This is a non-issue in my mind until there is more meat (not Rush Limbaugh blustering fat) towards it.

by ChesapeakeBay9er on Oct 10, 2009 1:01 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

whoa, we've got some really emotional posts on this thread

I honestly don’t know what the huge deal is here.

1 – Do NFL players have the right to refuse to play for any team for any reason?

Yes.

This is America. A player can currently refuse to play for the Rams or Raiders simply because they suck. A player can currently refuse to play for a team because he doesn’t like the owner, whether that owner is Jerry Jones, Dan Snyder, Al Davis, or even Rush Limbaugh. Depending on your contract, there could be consequences you’d have to pay for refusing to follow your contract – but that’s your right.

2 – Does anyone have the right to purchase NFL teams that are up for sale?

Yes.

If you have the cash to do it, go ahead. I’d say that owning an NFL football team would be one of almost any guy’s dreams.

3 – Does the owner of the Rams franchise have the right to refuse sale to anyone he doesn’t want to sell his team to?

Yes.

It’s a private franchise. As long as he’s not breaking the law, he can do whatever he wants.

From a football fan standpoint, I’d be most interested in whether Rush Limbaugh would manage his new franchise well – perhaps better than the current ownership (or better than, oh say, Dan Snyder manages the Redskins).

From a 49er fan standpoint, I’m perfectly happy with the current ownership keeping the Rams in the land of suck.

So, in summary. Rush Limbaugh can buy the team. Players can refuse to play for that team if he does buy it. And the Rams owner can choose to sell or to not sell his team to Limbaugh. Our crying and whining about anything else is superfluous. Basically, as long as the Niners keep beating the Rams, no matter who the (site decorum) the owner is, I know I’ll be happy.

"We’ll see them again in the playoffs." - Mike Singletary, right after the Week 3 Minnesota game

by Persiflage on Oct 10, 2009 4:05 PM PDT reply actions   1 recs

1 – Do NFL players have the right to refuse to play for any team for any reason?

Yes…… Depending on your contract, there could be consequences you’d have to pay for refusing to follow your contract – but that’s your right.

I don’t know that anyone disagrees with you there, but I think the point is that I (and I think most others too) strongly doubt the players who have or will come out against Limbaugh would be content to sit out the remainder of their contract and not get paid. Sure if they want to do that then fine, thats well within their right. If free agents take less money to sign with any other team, thats fine too, but I don’t think those are the issues being addressed here.

Thing A

by sam23 on Oct 11, 2009 2:44 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think the point is that I (and I think most others too) strongly doubt the players who have or will come out against Limbaugh would be content to sit out the remainder of their contract and not get paid.

So … they couldn’t play for any other team … so I guess I don’t understand what’s the problem? Either you follow your contract or you don’t. If Richard Seymour had refused to play for the Raiders, he would have just sat out a season, right? If I was him, I might even be second-guessing my decision to play after all.

"We’ll see them again in the playoffs." - Mike Singletary, right after the Week 3 Minnesota game

by Persiflage on Oct 11, 2009 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think the debate is about the players feeling like they would have the right to not play for the rams yet still somehow receive the money their contract calls for them to earn whether it be with another team or just by sitting out. If they are willing to sit out until their contract expires and not collect any money from the Rams I’ve got no problem with them making that political statement, but I doubt thats what they have planned.

Thing A

by sam23 on Oct 11, 2009 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

… the debate is about the players feeling like they would have the right to not play for the rams yet still somehow receive the money their contract calls for them to earn …

I don’t think anyone seriously would argue for this (much less argue for Richard Seymour doing the same thing if he had refused to play for Oakland after being traded to them). The precedent it would set would be too destructive.

A player could refuse to play or follow his contract AND still be paid?

This may be the main NFL related idea that it is the purpose of this thread to discuss, but come on, anyone?

"We’ll see them again in the playoffs." - Mike Singletary, right after the Week 3 Minnesota game

by Persiflage on Oct 11, 2009 7:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The fact of the matter is this

There is no way of tell in today’s world who is a racist, a bigot or whatever other term is used for people who believe in old ways of living. I learned at a very young age that you keep politics and religion out of the workplace and I still believe that today unless the parties involved can keep it civil. It is very ridiculous that politics is so serious for most people when in actuality politics is a joke that is being played on us…like a wise man once said to me about politics…no one knows anything but everyone knows everything.

I am one person who believes that Politics should be involved in certain aspects of sports; especially when it comes to unfair treatment. I without a shadow of a doubt can not stand Rush but he is entitled to purchase what he wants. But NFL owners should not under estimate the power of hate and dislike. In a sport where 75% of its players are black there could be a huge outcry against people like Rush getting into the NFL. As one person already pointed out there is no way of knowing if a current NFL owner is a bigot but I can promise you if and NFL owner ever said half of the things that Rush has said he wouldn’t be an nfl owner anymore.

Players do have the right to voice their opinion just like you do at your current job. Will that make a difference? Probably not. And I doubt that when it comes down to it that the NFL players will risk losing money for this cause. I think it would be more of an issue from the people(fans and non fans included).

"Of all the things in the world losing isn't so bad; it just starts to feel like it does when you do it for so long"

by ninerfanNVA on Oct 11, 2009 7:45 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I can promise you if and NFL owner ever said half of the things that Rush has said he wouldn’t be an nfl owner anymore.

Again, I point to Marge Schott and her views that seemed to indicate she was a fan of Hitler. Are the MLB and NFL so very different that that type of owner could survive for years and years in the MLB but not in the NFL? I doubt it.

Thing A

by sam23 on Oct 11, 2009 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

In a sport where 75% of its players are black there could be a huge outcry … I can promise you if an NFL owner ever said half of the things that Rush has said he wouldn’t be an nfl owner anymore.

Maybe I’m just out of the loop, but could anyone find a quote of what Limbaugh actually said that could cause players to sit out for a season refusing to follow their contracts? I’ve read a couple news articles on this, but every one of them just vaguely references Limbaugh’s HORRIBLE racist remarks without actually quoting him.

I also vaguely remember the ESPN thing about McNabb, but I can’t find a quote of what he actually said anywhere.

"We’ll see them again in the playoffs." - Mike Singletary, right after the Week 3 Minnesota game

by Persiflage on Oct 11, 2009 10:03 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Fooch I will put this and let it go: Top 10 racist quotes by Rush Limbaugh

This post is not about Rush Limbaugh but just so the record is straight I will give you these and let it be and you decide that if an NFL owner said these things if he would still be an owner. Or if there would be some issues in the league. These are not made up or misconstrued in any matter

1. I mean, let’s face it, we didn’t have slavery in this country for over 100 years because it was a bad thing. Quite the opposite: slavery built the South. I’m not saying we should bring it back; I’m just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer after dark.

2. You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray [the confessed assassin of Martin Luther King]. We miss you, James. Godspeed.

3.Have you ever noticed how all composite pictures of wanted criminals resemble Jesse Jackson?

4. Right. So you go into Darfur and you go into South Africa, you get rid of the white government there. You put sanctions on them. You stand behind Nelson Mandela — who was bankrolled by communists for a time, had the support of certain communist leaders. You go to Ethiopia. You do the same thing.

5. Look, let me put it to you this way: the NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it.

6. The NAACP should have riot rehearsal. They should get a liquor store and practice robberies.

7. They’re 12 percent of the population. Who the hell cares?

8. Take that bone out of your nose and call me back(to an African American female caller).

9. I think the media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well. They’re interested in black coaches and black quarterbacks doing well. I think there’s a little hope invested in McNabb and he got a lot of credit for the performance of his team that he really didn’t deserve.

10.Feminism was established to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream.

"Of all the things in the world losing isn't so bad; it just starts to feel like it does when you do it for so long"

by ninerfanNVA on Oct 11, 2009 10:41 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I don’t know about any of the others, but from what I gather the James Earl Ray quote (to me, by far the most offensive one on your list) is made up. Your point is still taken, but if he didn’t say it promoting lies like that only hurt your argument and this debate, I’d encourage you to post links or do some fact checking before posting that type of thing.

Thing A

by sam23 on Oct 11, 2009 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t know dude.

I tried to look for where those came from, and looks like it’s from an Al Sharpton website with zero sources or citations.

(10) is pretty funny though and has nothing to do with racism

"We’ll see them again in the playoffs." - Mike Singletary, right after the Week 3 Minnesota game

by Persiflage on Oct 11, 2009 7:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The specifics of Rush's beliefs aren't really relevant

The issue is this:

1) He has said many things that are offensive to many, if not most, NFL players.

2) He is unapologetic about them

3) His career is advocating political positions related to those beliefs.

4) He has made a career out of NOT respecting the political beliefs of his opponents.

This is different from somebody just being politically active – there were plenty of McCain supporters among NFL players, for example. (One bay area reporter, I can’t remember who, polled everyone on the team who’d answer during the run-up to the election).

I think most people can respect political differences. The catch is that Rush Limbaugh is not one of those people. He ridicules and lampoons those who disagree with him. There is no “respectful disagreement” in Rush’s universe. You’re either with him or you’re against him, and if you’re against him you’re lazy, hate america, or whatever.

I don’t think we’d be having this discussion if Rush was, say, a conservative Rachel Maddow (a woman who gives her political opponents time to make their arguments, and engages them solely on the merits of those arguments). He’s not. He is actively antagonistic to those who disagree with him politically.

And that’s the problem. Those who would say Rush’s politics shouldn’t matter need to grapple with the fact that Rush would never give you the same courtesy.

by Ronaldinho on Oct 11, 2009 11:48 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I don’t think we’d be having this discussion if Rush was, say, a conservative Rachel Maddow (a woman who gives her political opponents time to make their arguments, and engages them solely on the merits of those arguments). He’s not.

We should probably take this debate elsewhere Ronaldinho, but as someone who has spent a good bit of time studying and contrasting political media and campaign strategies I can tell you that thats exactly what he is. Maddow and Olbermann are almost the exact same (or opposite depending on how you look at it) entities as Limbaugh and Hannity, they just happen to fall on align themselves on the opposite side of the political spectrum. It appears youve fallen into a popular trap that is equally easy for people on both sides of the aisle to fall into and you’re stuggling to see Maddow or Limbaugh with an objective eye. I won’t argue the merits of Limbaugh’s methods with you, but saying he uses his message is different from Maddow’s in any way other than content is simply false. I’d be more than willing to continue this conversation with you via email or in another forum, but for the sake of Fooch (and everyone else) I don’t think we should continue it here.

Thing A

by sam23 on Oct 11, 2009 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thank you
but for the sake of Fooch (and everyone else) I don’t think we should continue it here.

by Fooch on Oct 11, 2009 1:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

oh, I'll also stop contributing to this discussion if you want it to end

Or should we limit it to less opinions on Limbaugh, and more opinions on the question of whether players should be able to violate their contracts by refusing to play and still get paid?

Probably be hard to separate the two if Limbaugh is supposed to be the exception to the rule.

"We’ll see them again in the playoffs." - Mike Singletary, right after the Week 3 Minnesota game

by Persiflage on Oct 11, 2009 7:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

tough call

That’s the problem with this whole thread. I think people can be adult enough, but who really knows.

by Fooch on Oct 11, 2009 10:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Nail to head. It’s about the behavior of the man not his political opinions.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Oct 12, 2009 2:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rush may or may not get a team...

I don’t care if he does or not. He is not a criminal. He says stupid things and has somewhat of a twisted outlook. Mike Vick got another chance to play(Which I agree with) after committing a HORRIBLE crime(I’m not a doglover either). So why can’t Rush have a team just because he made some stupid comments?

Many black players have stated that they wouldn’t play for him. Larry Fitzgerald(Whom I love even being loyal to red and gold) was on 1140 and had said that it’d be hard for Rush to get a team which I agree with. He gave his whole oppinion(Against Limbaugh) without clearly saying that he wouldn’t play for him. Riiiiiiight. This aint the 1960’s. There’s no civil rights movement. If Rush is wanting to pay you $10 million a year to catch or throw a football, you’d have to be a complete moron for not taking the money.

Mike Lamb also on 1140 said that he wished he could get Jim Browns take on the matter since him and so many players made sacrifices back in the day for what they believe. I say who gives a (site decorum) what Brown thinks now. He is from a different era and did great things during that crazy time. But this is now. You could’nt throw money at players like that and everything be ok back then. Players now would forget the stupid comments Rush has made pretty fast when they have 7 figures in their bank account.

Players represent the team more than the owner. That’s why football is the best sport. It’s about the team! Limbaugh has committed no crime for his words eventhough they were assinine.

"Bar None!" - William Floyd

by maveric_87 on Oct 13, 2009 7:57 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"We'll see them again in the playoffs." -- Coach Mike Singletary after a gut-wrenching week 3 loss to the Vikings.
Start posting about the 49ers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dave_small
Week 11 Prediction Games
Howtheyscoredcat_small
Official Alex Smith [Over]Reaction Thread: Bears Edition
Small
Alex Smith vs Aaron Rodgers(updated)
Small
The Titans/Niners play-by-play
Dave_small
Week 10 Prediction Games

Recent FanPosts

Montana_action_150-188_1__small
Top NCAA/NFL Prospects
Small
10 things the 49ers should not do
Italian_flag_small
Still think the Niners will reach the playoffs???
2305d0d49c908218_small
Packers fan with some questions
49ers_small
I have a feeling about this particular road game
Joe_and_bill_small
49ers QB - 2010
Small
Jimmy Raye - Ken Whisenhunt
Small
Niners Nation hits the big time
Shaun_hill_small
SINGLETARY WAS HIRED BECAUSE OF SHAUN HILL !!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SPONSORS


Head Ball Coach

Dave_small Fooch

Editors

Jerry_rice_small ProfessorBigelow

Assistant Coaches

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

Pixies_logo_small Florida Danny

M_12a62905a0324d2da2f43ddaf62c630f_small Ninjames

Duct_tape_bandit_small Josh from Hollywood

Crab_tree_small briandean

Moderators

Jackalope_card_small wjackalope