Get a piece of Joe Montana for $49 million
Montana has put his home/property in Calistoga on the market for $49 million. Forget raising money for charity, let's use NN's reader power to raise money and buy Montana's home!
over 2 years ago
David Fucillo
11 comments
0 recs |
Comments
$49 million?
Is the agent playing marketing games here?
I wonder if it’s really worth $16 million? In this bad economy, will Joe be pissed if he ends up stuck with $8 million?
by bignerd on Nov 10, 2009 3:45 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
I'm a bit belated here ...
… but I got this joke, laughed at the Steve Young reference, and rec’d accordingly. Sorry to have missed the boat on this one, bignerd. I think this comment was under-appreciated by everyone else!
"This could be another Very Special Team" ... Superbowl winning Niners lineman Dan Audick ...
by LondonNiner on Nov 11, 2009 12:58 PM PST up reply actions
I got 5 on it
that’s $5.00
A hearty thank you to Rich Aurilia for all the good memories, and to the Niners for finally getting the uni's (mostly) right.
Damn
Too rich for my blood.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Nov 10, 2009 5:37 PM PST up reply actions
$.07 Million?
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Nov 10, 2009 7:33 PM PST up reply actions
$.07 Trillion?
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Nov 11, 2009 1:34 PM PST up reply actions
I’m not sure how that would fit in your couch. I guess I’m hoping that you have a very large couch.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Nov 11, 2009 1:34 PM PST up reply actions



























