San Francisco 49ers 10 - Chicago Bears 6: Roman robs Cutler, Defense steals win
The game wasn't pretty, and despite 5 interceptions, the San Francisco 49ers hung on for a 4-point win over the struggling Chicago Bears. Michael Lewis intercepted Jay Cutler to end the Bears scary comeback drive with just seconds remaining on the clock. If San Francisco can take one thing away from this game, it is a "W". The team converted 5 INTs into just 10 points, and the defense kept everyone on the edge of their seats during the final drive. Cutler had the Bears marching after Dre Bly's Illegal Contact penalty gave the Bears a fresh set of downs.
The Bears began their march, by heading backwards, being penalized 25 yards total in the next two plays. Fifteen of those penalty yards came after a 12-yard catch by Matt Forte, which put the Bears back into a 2nd and long situation. Cutler briefly took over, completing 3 passes to Devin Hester (28 yards), 2 passes to Forte (32 yards), and 3 passes to three separate receivers to get the Bears deep inside 49ers territory at the 12-yard line. On First and Ten, Cutler over threw Greg Olsen in the end zone, leading to second down. It was then, that Strong Safety Michael Lewis stepped up in front of Olsen and intercepting the pass to finish the Bears off completely. A collective sigh of relief was heard through out Niners Nation.
After all, it was Greg Olsen that was giving the 49ers problems much of the contest, catching 7 passes for 75 yards. Matt Forte finished as the Bears leading receiver, with 8 catches for 120 yards. Cutler finished 29 of 52 for 307 yards, with 5 interceptions (I'll discuss those more in a minute). The San Francisco defense did a great job in shutting down the Bears for much of the game, especially against the run. The Bears struggled to gain just 43 rushing yards, and 85 of Cutler's passing yards came on the final drive. Chicago also didn't score in the red zone, attributed to Jay Cutlers 2 INTs inside the 49ers 20 yard line. Until the final drive, the 49ers didn't bend much at all, and eventually broke the Bears' back.
After the jump, Cutler's INTs in more detail, and a recap on the 49ers performance on both sides of the ball...
Cutler's Interceptions
1st Pick: Aubrayo Franklin at the SF 1 yard line. Cutler really didn't face a lot of pressure on this play action fake, but enough to make a bad read. The Bears QB threw the ball where three 49ers defenders were roaming, and the big NT picked the ball out of the area like a Tight End in the red zone. This was the longest drive of the game for Chicago, totalling 18 yards and 87 yards. Greg Olsen had 3 catches for 43 yards, and Matt Forte gained 29 of his 41 rushing yards on this drive.
2nd Pick: Tarell Brown intercepted Cutler after Devin Hester fell down making a cut during his route. Brown returned the ball 51 yards to the CHI 14 yard line, and immediately after Frank Gore scored on a 14-yard rush TD. David Baas had a killer pull block on the play that sprung Gore into the end zone.
3rd Pick: Dashon Goldson picked off the Bears QB on a 3rd and 10 play that saw Justin Smith pressure Cutler into making a poor decision. Unfortunately the 49ers couldn't capatilize on the turnover, and ended up turning the ball over on downs to Chicago on a failed QB sneak.
4th Pick: Ladies and Gentlemen, we have a Mark Roman sighting! While Roman may have gotten away with pass interference, we'll leave that debate for Bears fans to mull over. This interception came on a 4th and 7 play, and Cutler just made a bad throw with no pressure forcing him into the decision. San Francisco converted the INT into 3 points, and went up 10-6 for good.
5th Pick: Michael [Site Decorum] Lewis. End of analysis.
San Francisco Offense
Frank Gore had a very productive game, gaining 102 yards on the ground (25 carries), catching 4 passes for 21 yards and scoring the lone TD of the game. The Offensive Line didn't give Gore a great deal of help, as our RB was tackled for a loss 3 times and stuffed for no gain 4 times. However, the O-Line did give Gore some room during the team's final 4th quarter drive that saw Gore rush 8 times for 33 yards, while helping drive 12 plays and 48 yards to kill some clock. Andy Lee had a rare mishap on that final drive, punting the ball right into the endzone, giving Cutler and the Bears a shorter field to work with. I'll give credit to the Bears defense for limiting the run, but I have to hang some of the blame on the O-Line's shoulders.
Adam Snyder struggled in pass protection again, and Chilo Rachal didn't do much better. On a key 3rd and 7 in the first quarter, Snyder simply whiffed on his man, and Rachal seemed to give up on his man as Alex Smith was sacked for a loss. Joe Nedney ended up missing the 39-yard Field Goal, and while that wasn't Snyder or Rachal's fault, their sack didn't help. It seemed like most of the pressure was coming through the right side of our O-Line; I only saw Sims get beat badly once (it could be more, but I only noticed once). Baas did a good job for the most part in pass protection, although aside from his pull on Gore's 14-yard TD, didn't do much mauling in the run game. It seemed like every time Smith had to buy time, it was Snyder's fault.
For the most part, Alex Smith did a fine job getting himself out of trouble, and was sacked just two times in the game. One of the sacks was his own fault, as he held onto the ball for far too long on a first down play that kicked off San Francisco's 3rd drive of the game. Smith made a nice read on a blitz, but since no one picked up the blitzing defender, his pass intended for a wide open Vernon Davis was tipped. Luckily it fell to the ground harmlessly incomplete. Smith's only interception of the game came on a downfield shot to Michael Crabtree. There was no pressure, it was simply a bad pass by the former first rounder. Smith finished 16 of 23 with 118 yards and 1 INT.
Vernon Davis and the 49ers wide receivers didn't get a lot of yards or many looks, as the 49ers relied heavily on the defense to win the game. Michael Crabtree was targeted 4 times on the 49ers opening drive, and dropped one during that drive. Charles Tillman also made a nice play preventing Crabtree from making a potentially impressive 20-yard catch along the side line. Crab ended the game with 4 catches for 48 yards; he was targeted just 3 more times after the first drive. Josh Morgan had 3 catches for 24 yards and Vernon Davis had 3 for 16. I wasn't impressed by the 49ers offensive performance, as the team didn't move the ball much and had three 3-and-outs. They did a poor job on third downs (5 for 14), but managed to win the Time of Possession battle. Luckily the defense bailed the offense out.
San Francisco Defense
Jay Cutler was sacked zero times, and the Chicago Bears completed 8 of 16 on third downs. Chicago had three 3-and-outs, two on consecutive drives to start the game. The 49ers intercepted Cutler twice on third down, and once on fourth down, so that definitely wipes out the 50% success rate the Bears enjoyed on 3rd down. As mentioned previously, the 49ers run defense stifled Matt Forte and the Chicago O-Line, limiting the RB to just 2.1 ypc. The Bears can be credited for getting Forte the ball in the flats, but that's a testament to just how well the 49ers defense shut down the run game. Patrick Willis had a typical game with 11 tackles, and Takeo Spikes was effective until leaving the game with a hamstring injury (it's undetermined how serious the injury is). Matt Wilhem did a nice job filling in for the injured Spikes, getting his hand in on 5 tackles.
The true gem of the game was defensive end Justin Smith. On the first play of the game, Smith bull rushed a Chicago OLineman into Jay Cutler. Each play after in the short Bears series, Smith faced double teams. Through out much of the contest afterwards, Smith was fighting his way against double teams. I counted at least 4 QB pressures from Smith and at least 2 hits on the QB. Smith finished the game virtually invisible in the box score, registering just 3 tackles, but if you paid attention, his motor was going on every play. His ability to face numerous double teams helped provide other players the opportunity to make plays and pressure the QB. I cannot endorse the excellent play of Smith enough.
Overall, I counted at least 10 QB pressures from the 49ers Defensive front. Parys Haralson had at least 2, and Manny Lawson added two pressures as well. Ahmad Brooks had a nice pressure on a missed blitz pick up, and swatted a pass nicely. Patrick Willis also nearly sacked the Bears QB, and got a nice shot in on Cutler in the process. There were no sacks, but the defense did a good job keeping Cutler uncomfortable, and mostly ineffective, save for two long drives. The front seven really helped the 49ers secondary, who had a pretty good game despite allowing 307 yards passing. I mean really, how many bad things can I say about a defense that picks off 5 passes? They allowed the Bears to march twice, but snubbed both of those potential scoring drives with key interceptions in the red zone. I really can't complain, they got us the win.
Special Teams
Special Teams almost let us down tonight, but again, our defense came through in the clutch. Joe Nedney broke his consecutive FG streak from inside of 40 yards, missing a 39 yard attempt on the 49ers first offensive series. Andy Lee made a near fatal mistake by punting the ball into the end zone setting up the Bears final drive at the 20, instead of inside the 10. For the game Lee averaged just 33 yards per punt, and had just 1 land inside the 20. The coverage units were very impressive however, as the Bears started inside their own 20 five times in the game. Chicago averaged 14 yards per kick return, and Devin Hester returned 2 punts for just 4 yards. San Francisco's return game wasn't bad, as Arnaz Battle handled the kick off return duties, averaging 25 yards on his two returns. The 49ers started inside their own 20 three times in the contest and Brandon Jones didn't muff any punts, or catch any inside the SF 5 yard line. Overall, the Special Teams did a fine job outside of Nedney's missed FG and Lee's poor punting (that just seems wrong saying that).
Closing Comments
A win is a win, no matter how ugly. We all can walk away from this game realizing it was ugly, but that's +1 in the column in front of losses. I never thought I'd say this, but Michael Lewis and Mark Roman each intercepted a pass in the same game. For now Niners Nation, let's enjoy the "W", and the rare feat accomplished by two of our safeties.
173 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Both of our teams
are not very good.
Big props to your head football coach.
You are all gentlemen (and ladies) and good judges of cheap whiskey.
the 49ers defense really bailed out the offense
It wasn’t pretty by any means, that’s a fact.
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 12, 2009 10:05 PM PST up reply actions
That game looked like a game being played between two bottom feeders. Honestly, we probably just failed to lose the game more than we actually succeeded in winning it.
That said, I’ll darn sure take it.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Nov 12, 2009 10:08 PM PST up reply actions
The only rational response to a game like this:
lol Cutler.
Cutler ain't nearly the problem.
Our OL was found on craigslist.
You are all gentlemen (and ladies) and good judges of cheap whiskey.
You must have gotten it from the same seller we bought ours from.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Nov 12, 2009 10:08 PM PST up reply actions
Can’t wait for Staley and Pashos to come back lol
49ers Al Grito De Guerra!!! hahaha
by 49erSalvatrucha on Nov 12, 2009 10:13 PM PST up reply actions
Pashos
may never be back. He’s out for the season and a free agent.
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 12, 2009 10:15 PM PST up reply actions
I don't see how we can let him go
Unless we find someone better in FA. He’s certainly better at RT than Snyder is. Simms has been a pretty good LT for us, though he didn’t do so hot on the right side.
Yeah I think they’ll keep Pashos around
49ers Al Grito De Guerra!!! hahaha
by 49erSalvatrucha on Nov 12, 2009 10:19 PM PST up reply actions
LOL
49ers Al Grito De Guerra!!! hahaha
by 49erSalvatrucha on Nov 12, 2009 10:14 PM PST up reply actions
I thought
Roman ALWAYS makes us lose games, who is gonna eat their shoes now?
I know Roman's biggest fan.
Where is Danny? I know he was disgusted with the game too.
Does Mark Roman lead the team in INTs? He has 2 for the season.
He finally got a pick lol
49ers Al Grito De Guerra!!! hahaha
by 49erSalvatrucha on Nov 12, 2009 10:19 PM PST up reply actions
yeah, in the preseason
that was his first this year I do believe.
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 12, 2009 10:24 PM PST up reply actions
yes it except he ensured a W tonight… so I guess you wished we had gotten an L? is your hatred that deep?
He ensured a win?
One play ensured the win? This is the belief that lead you to challenge my fanhood? It’s not hatred it’s fact. He does play better at SS, but he has single handedly lost games on one play, being he gave up a TD, it’s not like it was a pick in the endzone or something.
"Optimist Prime"
"Child Please" -Ochocinco
present...
yes, congrats to roman for recording his first INT in 1,046 days. definitely a productive free safety the niners need to continue to have on their roster.
p.s. as has been mentioned, roman benefitted from a blatant non-call of pass interference.
p.s.s. INTs as a niner since the beginning of 2007: roman = 1; aubrayo franklin = 1
p.s.s.s. # of games/starts to reach 2 INTs & 1 forced fumble: dashon goldson = 9 (11 starts), roman = 72 (60 starts)
p.s.s.s.s. jay cutLOLer threw a pick to roman (0 INTs in 1,046 days), michael lewis (0 INTs in 711 days), and franklin (0 INTs in his NFL career). the only thing that would have been worse than roman picking off a QB who was acting like the human momento-ball maker is NOT picking off cutLOLer
p.s.s.s.s.s. in case you haven’t noticed, i still think roman sucks.
by (Florida) Danny Tuccitto on Nov 13, 2009 12:10 AM PST up reply actions
correction:
goldson = 28 games (11 starts)
by (Florida) Danny Tuccitto on Nov 13, 2009 12:11 AM PST up reply actions
p.s.s. INTs as a niner since the beginning of 2007: roman = 1; aubrayo franklin = 1
awesome
"Pat is still just scratching the surface." - Coach Singletary on LB Patrick Willis
PI
That wasn’t PI, because Roman was playing the ball. If you’re in position to catch the ball (which he obviously was) you don’t get called for PI for blocking the receiver’s path.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
^
Correct.
If any Blatantly wrong call was made regarding PI it was the call made against Spencer, when he was obviously playing the ball.
I was "Deific16"
The cake is a lie.
by Sultan of Seitan on Nov 13, 2009 2:12 AM PST up reply actions
Yeah, the only way that they don’t collide on that play is if he jumps out of the way and lets the reception happen. He was facing the ball and playing the ball. He wasn’t even moving toward the receiver in any way. There’s no way that can be a PI in my book.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Nov 13, 2009 8:15 AM PST up reply actions
on that note
i like Bob Papa…but can I say that this was HORRIBLE coverage for this game. I don’t know about you guys but the cameras were “shifty” for me all game…like a bad trip or watchign the screen with a giant fan blade spinning in front of it. The camera angles were not good, and I really don’t think I like Matt Millen. For that Matter I think Papa does a good job calling Giants games…and should probably stick to it.
What are you talking about? I thought the multiple crash zooms were AWESOME!
It was like watching a B Sci-Fi movie.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Nov 13, 2009 8:23 AM PST up reply actions
Lotta people didn't like Millen
I used to hold a grudge for his poor commentating in the Niners-Falcons playoff game, but I actually thought he did well. He has a good voice, says something beyond the basics and did allow for some non speaking seconds to go by. Most crews now feel they have to fill every second with talking.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
Millen gets a tainted rep
because of his tainted tenure in Detroit. If he hadn’t “debacled” that franchise, I don’t think people would regard as fodder so much. Perhaps not though.
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 13, 2009 10:00 AM PST up reply actions
Please stop throwing the word taint around so much.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Nov 13, 2009 10:08 AM PST up reply actions
“I think she wants me to rub olive oil on your taint”
Sorry that’s only movie quote I could find. I was really looking for the one from Knocked Up where Jonah Hill says something along the lines of “in the Getway, you see Alec Baldwin’s taint at the 1 hour, 5 minute mark”.
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 13, 2009 10:19 AM PST up reply actions
“Hey Lupita, what do you call that thing in between the dick and the asshole?”
“The coffee table”
Man I love weeds.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
Honestly, I’ve never been able to listen to the song Tainted Love in quite the same way.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Nov 13, 2009 10:37 AM PST up reply actions
just read this...
in scott ostler’s SF chronicle article (my emphasis added):
And they won. For Singletary, there are no moral victories in losing, so why should there be tainted wins? The 49ers earned this one.
taint is definitely the word of the day. :-)
by (Florida) Danny Tuccitto on Nov 13, 2009 1:47 PM PST up reply actions
tainted twosome!
(VD and crabs)
by (Florida) Danny Tuccitto on Nov 13, 2009 11:22 AM PST up reply actions
I was also going to mention
The missed illegal hands to the face call VD should’ve been flagged for on the 4-yard first down run by Michael Robinson, but had to hold back.
I think the Roman PI is debatable, as he was playing the ball. However, he did bump Olsen (I think it was Olsen) before the ball arrived.
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 13, 2009 5:29 AM PST up reply actions
I know that
“Post script” (PS) is pretty much irrelevant when you are keyboarding (since you can just go back and edit).
But you repeat the P. Post-Post-script. Post-Post-Post script.
Not the s.
P.S. Don’t mess with Mark Roman… he’ll decimate you!
FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.
I like script-scripts.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Nov 13, 2009 9:07 AM PST up reply actions
yeah, you're right...
brain fart. i’m allowed one grammatical error every 8 months, though.
by (Florida) Danny Tuccitto on Nov 13, 2009 11:24 AM PST up reply actions
If you add it up, though, that’s like ten of them.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Nov 13, 2009 12:29 PM PST up reply actions
no..
that be like 12 of they.
by (Florida) Danny Tuccitto on Nov 13, 2009 12:50 PM PST up reply actions
all i have to do to avoid...
mark roman decimation is dress up like a football or opposing player.
by (Florida) Danny Tuccitto on Nov 13, 2009 11:27 AM PST up reply actions
Not that I think Roman's spectacular
but we don’t really have anyone better. Goldson’s even debatable at this point. Safety plz in this draft kthx.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
I think if we were to write a book
of the 2009 Niners (to date) that would be the title.
FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.
last week...
TEN scored 24 pts off of niner turnovers…with a guy at QB who was on 24-hour suicide watch a year ago
this week, the niners score 10 pts off of 5 CHI turnovers.
that just shows you how inept this offense is.
by (Florida) Danny Tuccitto on Nov 13, 2009 11:33 AM PST up reply actions
I don't think Bly should be forgotten here.
As much as the rest of the D bailed of the offense, they bailed out Bly. We’d stopped then on fourth down, and that gave them life.
It was a pretty iffy call from what I saw...
You have been DFiBrillated.
by Dubs fan in Boston on Nov 12, 2009 10:50 PM PST up reply actions
By rule it was the correct call I guess
but I don’t think the contact changed the momentum of the player, so I wish refs wouldn’t call it when it’s that ticky tack.
Call was weak
Since it had no impact on the play, did not impede the receiver and happens throughout the game. That’s an example of a ref inserting himself into the outcome of the game. If you’ve let the ticky-tack stuff go all game let it go with the game on the line.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
agreed
They (the refs) had no issue with letting one of the Niners get mushed in the face mask after pulling a Bear off the pile up following the Gore fumble/Morgan save. It was totally after the play and could have been an easy call but they let it go. I’m not comparing the two because I think that mush should have been a personal foul but late in the game the refs must have broken the heating elements in the bean bag part of the flags- they could not keep them in their pockets for anything.
Kudos on the win 49ers fans.
But to be honest, from what I saw of the game I don’t think either team deserved to win.
Even though Cutler had 4 interceptions before he had a shot at taking the lead, he threw an interception instead of taking the lead.
As someone who came from the Cardinals board, hopefully the division can stay competitive if you guys win enough games.
Lifelong Arizona Cardinals/Chicago Bears fan.
No band-wagoner fans allowed, pick a team and stick with em, throughout the good and the bad.
So, another loss...
But let’s keep looking on the bright side. The defense played pretty well… Another good game from Gore… Looks like the Niners will have a top 10 draft pick, plus the first rounder from Caroli………
…WELL IT FEELS LIKE A LOSS
Why couldn't McCovey have hit the ball just three feet higher??
How Do You Figure
the 49ers will have a top 10 pick. At 4-5 they are closer to the 20’s then the top 10. Look at the other teams with worse records than San Francisco and it just comes down to simple math
"Cannot play with them. Cannot win with them. Cannot coach with them. Can't do it. I want winners. I want people that want to win!!!"
by nocal81(Vincent) on Nov 12, 2009 11:46 PM PST up reply actions
Sarchasm
See, the Niners played so poorly, that I was pretending to have forgotten that they actually won the game. So, I was imagining them with a 3-6 record. Then in the middle of my post, I remembered that they actually won the game.
It was a joke. I was trying to be funny. As usual, it didn’t really work.
Why couldn't McCovey have hit the ball just three feet higher??
PANTHERS
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Nov 13, 2009 8:17 AM PST up reply actions
seriously
that was a horrible display of offensive play…
can we win a damn game without the defense making all of the plays???
have we even won a game this year where the offense has out scored the defense. i mean lets be honest today the offense scored points but the defense put us in the position to do so.
also i never thought cutler would under play smith, but what we saw tonight was two of the most under achieving starting QB’s in the NFL.
Ugly doesn't begin to describe it
With apologies to Bears fans (some of whom were next to me at Maggie McGarry’s), this was the most inept opponent I’ve seen all year, worse than the Rams. Five interceptions turned into 10 points? Five interceptions, and the game was still in doubt in the last minute? To put it as mildly as I can, that’s unsatisfactory.
If we can’t take better advantage of so many gifts, how will we ever defeat a competent team? Call me perverse, but I had more confidence in the 9ers after a close loss to the Colts than I do after this victory.
Opposite of Ugly
If you’ll indulge the irrelevancy, I was struck with the beautiful scenic shots of San Francisco incorporated into the broadcast. Not for the hundredth time, I thought how lucky we are to live in the loveliest city in North America! Even if the 49ers never win another championship, I’m not moving to Pittsburgh.
Cutler had the Bears marching after Dre Bly’s Illegal Contact penalty gave the Bears a fresh set of downs.
That was a horrible call. They even said so on the post-game. Bly barely touched the guy at 5 1/2… that never gets called. The refs definitely helped to keep them alive on that last drive
Absolutely Horrible Call
As was the Personal foul penalty on Brown.
By the way didn’t Tarrell Brown step up big time in this game? I am not just talking about the INT, but his play overall. It looks like we have two stud corners in Spencer and Brown that could be around for quite a while
"Cannot play with them. Cannot win with them. Cannot coach with them. Can't do it. I want winners. I want people that want to win!!!"
by nocal81(Vincent) on Nov 12, 2009 11:43 PM PST up reply actions
I think so
but Knox is a rookie and streaky…. I want to see him go against someone a bit better. Spencer is and has been very very good all season for the majority
that call was a good call
the initial replay of it wasn’twaht he got called on but later they cut back and showed him slapping knox in the facemask. pure and easy called. I was angry about it until I saw that.
by foosball4949 on Nov 13, 2009 8:15 AM PST up reply actions
Jay Cutler has now thrown 17 interceptions this year, which is more than Alex Smith threw in his only full season of starting.
Also, Vernon Davis is like the Kwame Harris of false starts.
GROUGTHINK ALERT
The first Chester Arthur fanboy ever.
That blows me away. Cutler must be infuriating to watch on a game by game basis.
Wall-E for Best Picture 2008
2009: The return of Los Galacticos!
by Useful_Idiot on Nov 13, 2009 1:44 AM PST up reply actions
Yeah what is that all about?
Also, Vernon Davis is like the Kwame Harris of false starts.
What does he have like 7 or 8 false starts now? Ridiculous.
I was "Deific16"
The cake is a lie.
by Sultan of Seitan on Nov 13, 2009 2:16 AM PST up reply actions
The game tonight and the season so far reminds me of college...
You know those nights in college where you all would go out to the bar and be wearing the bi-focal beer goggles? And after you knocked back a few more than you should have, you’d be talking to the hottest chick in the bar and then leave with her and take her back to your dorm room? ….. Then upon waking up in the morning, you realize she wasn’t as great as you remembered the night before? Some of you all know that numb feeling…the one where you don’t know how to feel about what had happened the night before? Some of you can relate I am sure… anyway…
I have that same numb feeling after this win. You can’t really enjoy it but it was a W either way.
No, I don’t know that feeling.
Wall-E for Best Picture 2008
2009: The return of Los Galacticos!
by Useful_Idiot on Nov 13, 2009 1:45 AM PST up reply actions
46 comments in this thread and do you all realize not one negative thing has been said about Alex Smith? Not one! I’m shocked! lol.
This game tonight (yesterday) was the reason I was still happy after the loss to the Vikings. At least then the Niners were a very good team, and after all these years I know we all could use a good team.
If Bochy coached the Warriors Bengie Molina would start every game at PG.
by cybermaldonado on Nov 12, 2009 11:29 PM PST reply actions
No complaining here
Not after only the fourth home night game in six seasons. Not after four straight losses, two of which had a positive feel to them, I’ll take a smudgy and imperfect win without a second thought. Both teams were banged up and playing on a very short week. Both have flaws. And both were feeling pressure to turn it around, especially the men in red. Yet instead of winning the battle of stats and feel-good analysis, the Niners actually won the game which is more important.
One thing that continues to be different from years past: SF would have to play near perfect to beat anyone not named Rams or LIons. This season they make self-inflicted mistakes while still having noticeable flaws yet still have a chance to win every game except vs Atlanta. And despite the problems they won tonight. It’s not like other good teams don’t occasionally have ugly wins. Just breaking the four game slide should remove some pressure from the next game.
Now, ten days off and a trip to GB to get back to .500. Works for me.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
Thank you
I agree.
Not sure why people are saying this was an ugly game. This was a great defensive battle. The defenses played great on both sides for 95% of the plays.
Sometimes I like to see a shootout game but sometimes I love even more watching a defensive battle and this is what it was. Plus there’s always more pressure on the offense than the defense and I think having only 4 days to prepare for this game contributed to the lack of offensive success,
by fortyniners on Nov 13, 2009 12:11 AM PST up reply actions
Agreed
If the Niners win this game 30-27, we’d hear about how awful the Niners secondary is and how they let Cutler rip them apart and we only moved the ball because Chicago’s D sucks and thus neither team is deserving of the playoffs. Instead it’’s 10-6, 5 INTs and the same arguments.
Note: Cutler threw for more yards and TDs with fewer INTs against AZ. The Bears also ran for more yards vs AZ. While critiquing the mistakes and pointing out the season long flaws let’s also appreciate the good and not act as though SF is so far away from AZ and other playoff teams just because this was not a pretty game.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
we allowed
like 330 yards passing. And when playing OTHER NFL teams, Chicago has one of the worst defenses, so I think our lack of offense can be squarely put on … our offense. How many 30 yards screen passes to Matt Forte did we give up?
Game was just epic fail all around. Except Gore and
FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.
epic fail
except where it mattered most, the score board (SF 10 CHI 6). It would’ve been an epic fail had the Niners lost, but instead, it’s just an ugly win with many sub-fails.
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 13, 2009 9:12 AM PST up reply actions
I meant for both teams
FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.
A Win Is A Win
Especially considering if we had lost this one any thought of playoffs would have had me thinking about a Mora like rant by Singletary.
Look it wasn’t pretty, good teams win ugly games and the 49ers did that tonight. The defense stood up and played like champions today. Goldson, Lawson and once again Franklin stood up and played great. As did Brown, Willis, Smith and even Wilhelm.
Regarding Alex Smith, well he played good. Not many mistakes if any, the interception was on a long pass taking a chance, that is something i will not fault Smith or Raye on. Also Crabtree didn’t do Smith any favors in regards to that play. More on the rookie receiver, people this dude is a straight up baller, just watch he is about to break out for a 100+ yard game. Overall i am happy with the win, the way Alex Smith played, Frank Gore ran and even the offensive line. It was an ugly ugly ugly ugly game but once again we came out of it with a W and that’s all that matters
"Cannot play with them. Cannot win with them. Cannot coach with them. Can't do it. I want winners. I want people that want to win!!!"
by nocal81(Vincent) on Nov 12, 2009 11:40 PM PST reply actions
I feel sorry for Bears fans
After all those years of Rex Grossman they trade those lovely draft picks to get… Rex Grossman 2.0?
by Deelron on Nov 12, 2009 11:40 PM PST via mobile reply actions
I Don't Fee Bad
It was a stupid trade at the time and i said as much. They got what they deserved, Cutler looked absolutely lost out there and our QB outplayed there’s
"Cannot play with them. Cannot win with them. Cannot coach with them. Can't do it. I want winners. I want people that want to win!!!"
by nocal81(Vincent) on Nov 12, 2009 11:42 PM PST up reply actions
Cutler reminds me of Brett Favre
In that he’s a d-bag
Wall-E for Best Picture 2008
2009: The return of Los Galacticos!
by Useful_Idiot on Nov 13, 2009 1:47 AM PST up reply actions
Cutler
just looked like he didn’t care. He had this blank look on his face almost all game like he didn’t care
Sure you’re not thinking of Jamarcus Russell?
Wall-E for Best Picture 2008
2009: The return of Los Galacticos!
by Useful_Idiot on Nov 13, 2009 1:48 AM PST up reply actions
He's had it since he played at Vanderbilt
I guess that’s why he always jawed with Phillip Rivers.
Rivers is smiling like a [site deorum] 24-7 and Jay Cutler looks as if he just found out his dog died.
Complete opposites.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 13, 2009 1:54 PM PST up reply actions
That’s just his diabetes.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Nov 13, 2009 8:19 AM PST up reply actions
i thought that too
i was wondering if he was like in glucose crash or something…he looked pale…maybe I just haven’t seen him up close as often as I did last night.
Oh, I was joking. I don’t think it was his diabetes. I just wanted somebody to get a chance to post one of those DIABEETUS pictures.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Nov 13, 2009 8:33 AM PST up reply actions

"Pat is still just scratching the surface." - Coach Singletary on LB Patrick Willis
by 49erLou on Nov 13, 2009 11:25 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
That Is The Only Comparison
You can draw between the two. I am sure Favre would have rallied the team on the sidelines after his 4th pick instead of whining and bitching about the lack of a penalty call. Cutler isn’t a leader and that was evidenced tonight
"Cannot play with them. Cannot win with them. Cannot coach with them. Can't do it. I want winners. I want people that want to win!!!"
by nocal81(Vincent) on Nov 12, 2009 11:45 PM PST reply actions
i know this is premature, but...
does this “W” give anyone here an iota of confidence that this niner team can go into lambeau and beat the “automatic W vs. SF” packers?
part of me thinks they get massacred in GB. the other part of me remembers watching rodgers against TB last week, and realizes that GB certainly fits the “team that self-destructs as much as the 49ers” mold of teams SF can actually beat.
by (Florida) Danny Tuccitto on Nov 13, 2009 12:14 AM PST reply actions
this team
doesn’t really get massacred, ATL excepted. If we were going to collapse that hard this season, Indy would have demolished us.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
GB is finally one team against which the Niners can create a pass rush
That they’ve had as many good moments on defense without a dominant rush tells me just how strong the LB play and DBs are along with overall run D. Playing B should present many opportunities to do to Rodgers what is always done to Smith/Hill.
Plus the Niners get ten days off to rest and prepare, while GB comes of a run of Favre-II, loss in Tampa and Cowboys week. Methinks they may be a bit worn down.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
they also have bad special teams.
Actually the game in GB could be quite similar to this one, but with 49er sacks instead of INTs….
FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.
I could see that.
I’ll take the NIners sacking Rodgers five times and getting an INT or two.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
having 14 days of rest...
didn’t exactly help in the HOU game
by (Florida) Danny Tuccitto on Nov 13, 2009 11:18 AM PST up reply actions
That may have been more a QB issue
Cause the defense and ST coverage were fine, especially early in the game.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
I think we can handle GB
they have a LMAOLine, while we just have a LOLine. Their defense isn’t close to being what it should be, and still transitioning to the 3-4. I think we should win, but I’m not going to bank on it.
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 13, 2009 5:24 AM PST up reply actions
what can I say
Green Bay deserves it.
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 13, 2009 12:25 PM PST up reply actions
between...
SF’s LMAOLine and GB’s LMAOLine, are we looking at a game that breaks the record for most combined sacks?
by (Florida) Danny Tuccitto on Nov 13, 2009 12:54 PM PST up reply actions
Nope
Green Bay decided to move their best pass-rusher out of the 4-3 and into a system where he’s ineffective and Manny Lawson takes like 10 seconds to get to the QB.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 13, 2009 1:56 PM PST up reply actions
or jumps seven feet in the air
as the opposing QB waits patiently for him to land.
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 13, 2009 2:47 PM PST up reply actions
That play was hilarious. Jump TOWARD him Manny.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
Good morning Niners Nation!
Fantastic start to my Friday. Got up at 5am and spent an hour before leaving for work, sitting drinking coffee in my cosily lit living room, with my dog nestled next to me, watching the Niners win on time-delay TV. Watching at 2 x speed actually made the game seem more entertaining than it probably was at normal speed too!
A W is a W is a W. Just need Arizona to lose on Sunday …
"This could be another Very Special Team" ... Superbowl winning Niners lineman Dan Audick ...
It’s interesting that you have to get up at 5am to watch the Niners, and I do the same thing (well, 7am usually) to watch Manchester United.
A few years ago when I was visiting London, I had massive jet lag that kept me up until 4am for my first few nights, and I remember watching baseball to keep myself entertained. It was the weirdest thing.
Wall-E for Best Picture 2008
2009: The return of Los Galacticos!
by Useful_Idiot on Nov 13, 2009 1:53 AM PST up reply actions
Didn't hit Reply ..
… by bad … response below.
"This could be another Very Special Team" ... Superbowl winning Niners lineman Dan Audick ...
Tempted to not talk to you ...
… with that avatar, Useful_Idiot. But we shall let our shared love of the Niners override our differences when it comes to the English Premier League! Actually, to be honest I have no antipathy towards Man Utd. I’m a Tottenham man, and as you will know our local rivals are Arsenal and Chelsea, and Man U have provided the most likely way of either of those two not winning the league in recent years, so us Spurs fans find ourselves bizarrely rooting for your lot often.
I don’t usually have to get up at that time. It was just because it was a night game – the MNF against the Cards will be the only other time I need to watch on time-delay before setting off to work. Usually the 10am Pacific games are 6pm for me, which is a fantastic slot (although kids’ bedtimes interferes with kick-off and a bit of the first quarter) and the 1pm Pacific games are 9pm for me (advantage – kids asleep by then; disadvantage, I go to bed after midnight on a work night).
Out of interest, do you find any forums in this country about Man Utd which are as good as Niners Nation? I just don’t think we do anything like this as well in this country for English football?
"This could be another Very Special Team" ... Superbowl winning Niners lineman Dan Audick ...
English Football league is still relatively new to us. We can buy a sports programming package which will show the games but I think foreigners buy the package, not Americans. Yet, no media attention in this county. My brother in law absolutely loves English football. I will ask him if there are any good blogs, he would know.
Haha, yeah I don’t have any antipathy towards Tottenham, and sometimes I even find it hard to dislike Arsenal and Chelsea (unless we’re playing them, or one of them wins the league)… It’s really just Liverpool and Man City that I can’t stand- though I may be the only Man Utd. fan in the world who has a bit of a soft spot for Steve Gerrard…
And I’ve had a hard time finding any good forums, but I spend a lot of time on theoffside.com and footytube.com. They don’t get nearly the activity that the sbnation sites get, but theoffside has a lot of interesting reads.
Wall-E for Best Picture 2008
2009: The return of Los Galacticos!
by Useful_Idiot on Nov 13, 2009 12:31 PM PST up reply actions
After losing 4 straight
Last night’s win was as pretty as it could get.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
Calling out Alex Smith
No, he didn’t have multiple turnovers…great. Did anyone see his horrible pocket presence though? Go back and watch it please. He is NOT comfortable in the pocket whatsoever. Stop blaming protection on it. He has to make quick decisions. What is he just going to cry about the protection and take a sack, throw an INT, etc. every play?
He broke the pocket WAY too early SO many times last night. He neglected to hit wide open receivers who were within 15 yards MANY times. Right after he takes his dropback he starts panicking. He also doesn’t make reads, period. He locks and and either throws it (forces it half the time) or freaks out and runs for his life, all the while missing other open receivers.
I have been supportive, and I’m not going to root against the guy when he’s in the game for us…but I have to be honest about what I continue to see in him. I was on the bandwagon because he has a better arm than Hill…but he can’t pull the trigger soon enough or go through progressions.
Go back and watch the Nate Davis video. No time to throw, often covered receivers, still go the ball out quick and hit guys in stride. Scrubs or not…that translates.
I disagree
I thought Smith showed pretty good pocket presence at times last night. There were a few plays he rolled out just in time, and another couple that he stepped up into the pocket to avoid the rush. I’m not saying he was great in the pocket, but I didn’t think he looked awful. I certainly don’t think he broke the pocket too early every time he evaded pressure.
He definitely still needs to improve on it, but I think he’s getting better. And the protection on the right side of the line is terrible, there’s no denying that. They’re to blame for a lot of the woes, and they certainly don’t improve Smith’s happy feet.
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 13, 2009 7:33 AM PST up reply actions
we can agree to disagree
I went into the game with high hopes, well, put it this way…don’t turn the ball over more than twice Alex and make good decisions.
Well he did nice job on not turning the ball over. IN fact, Crabtree fell down on the INT that Smith threw. Feet got tangled I’d guess.
But seriously, watch Smith in the pocket. He drops back, he get’s happy feet, he dances, he runs…That’s one of my issues.
Then watch his eyes. He locks on! I noticed guys open more than a few times last night but Smith was staring down the intended route the whole way. When that guy isn’t open he seems to panick.
I’ve got the good ole swine flu so I’m hoping to go back and watch the DVR this afternoon (I’m east coast). If I’m wrong in my assessments made while watchign it live…I will be sure to come on here and say so.
Watch the Nate Davis video though and just answer me these two things:
1. Did he have a lot of time to throw?
2. Did he get the ball out and make good decisions?
I know the kid more than likely isn’t ready…but at least we have a guy who looks comfortable with chaos around him. The chaos is going to be there for a little while…so we need that.
Bottom line is that Smith needs to be comfortable in the pocket
with pressure or not…and I’m not sure if that’s in his DNA or if that can change.
quick throws beat pass rushes
and force D’s to rush fewer guys. So Alex can help his O-Line give him more time. That’s all I’m saying. Maybe it’s a game planning thing…he should throw short unless he has time…IDK.
slants, drags, comebacks...
and please, can we try to run a WR screen to crabtree when he’s iso man to man instead of in a twins formation?
they ran a few slants
and on the one smith sack, he had the slant open but for someone reason hung onto the ball, I agree he needs improvement, but I do think he’s improving from where he was before. His pocket presence wasn’t 100% disgusting, just some what disgusting.
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 13, 2009 9:14 AM PST up reply actions
Did anyone see his horrible pocket presence though?
Uh…. what pocket?
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Nov 13, 2009 8:19 AM PST up reply actions
QB's have to make quick throws if the protection isn't great
we can’t keep blaming the o-line. Alex has to make some quick decisions sooner or later.
and I'm not saying the O-Line isn't the biggest part of the problem
but Smith has to find a way to be as successful as he can despite the O-Line.
I think he did a pretty admirable job of making up for consistently horrible pass protection yesterday. Only two sacks, and he almost got away from one of them. Still completed 60+% of his throws, most of which had to come on broken plays. And he didn’t crutch on his checkdown receiver to make those throws.
He wasn’t great, but I think calling him bad for this game is unfair. I actually don’t know if you can call him anything for this game. It just seemed like everybody else was so bad and the field was in such bad shape that trying to measure how well he actually played is really difficult.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Nov 13, 2009 8:31 AM PST up reply actions
3 days to prep certainly didn't help
Either team for sure, but especially for one with a new QB, WR and LT. They’ve had too few reps to have one day of practice before a game.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
He neglected to hit wide open receivers who were within 15 yards MANY times.
Uh… what wide open receivers?
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Nov 13, 2009 8:20 AM PST up reply actions
I still insist he slipped on his drop, lost all visual and tossed the ball away as soon as he regained his balance. I have a hard to believing he would have thrown the ball away if he knew Morgan was that wide open.
Go back and watch the Nate Davis video. No time to throw, often covered receivers, still go the ball out quick and hit guys in stride. Scrubs or not…that translates.
Aaaaaaaaaaand there’s the kicker.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Nov 13, 2009 8:21 AM PST up reply actions
I've not clammored for Davis
and still am not. Just saying he seems to show better presence with guys around him, that’s all.
Sorry for picking on your post, by the way. I just didn’t see the same ineptitude out of Smith that you seem to have, and the Nate Davis shout-out at the end was a bit much.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Nov 13, 2009 8:33 AM PST up reply actions
A lot of people fell down. There was a play when Smith threw before Morgan broke, and Morgan fell down making his break. That would have been an easy pick if the defender didn’t get caught on Morgan’s flailing limbs.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Nov 13, 2009 8:22 AM PST up reply actions
True
And yet Alex had Gore wide open underneath for an 8-12 yard game. This is the kind of stuff I expect to see Alex improve on, with playing time and film study of his play. The INT was bad luck which happens. I can’t blame him for trusting Crabtree in a jump ball situation after the nice snag he made on the first play of the game but the smarter play is to go underneath for another first down when the defense has dropped into a three-deep zone. Hopefully he keeps getting better with PT and reps with his receivers.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
Dare I say...
Smith did a great Hill impression last night
minus the statue-like behavior in the pocket that Hill would have had
yes. He took less sacks than Hill would have too.
yeah but boy that interception/pop-up looked like one of hill's deep throws
by foosball4949 on Nov 13, 2009 8:22 AM PST up reply actions
It really wasn't a Hill pop-up
He trusted Crabs to win the jump ball and why not? He did on the first play of the game. But he should’ve gone underneath due to the coverage. Risk wasn’t worth the reward and hopefully more playing time will fix that. Hill doesn’t risk that throw but the D wouldn’t have been in a deep zone so the underneath stuff wouldn’t have been open either.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
Yep.
Though Sing stated he should have thrown the ball more inside which the coverage dictated. I just like that Alex trust Crabtree that much, both on that play and the first offensive play of the game. He wasn’t really open on either but had a chance (minus the slip) on both.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
Hill can't make that throw, even if he's wide open.
“It cam down like a punt coach”
-John Morgan
"Optimist Prime"
"Child Please" -Ochocinco

by 

























