Jimmy Raye Approval Rating, Week 10

I guess this is now Approval Rating Tuesday. We haven't done the Jimmy Raye Approval Rating since week 4, but now is as good a time as any to bring it back. The masses called for it, so here you go (I'm thinking we'll roll out Manusky tomorrow). Back in week 4, Jimmy Raye had a 61% approval rating as the 49ers were showing some serious signs of life. Much has changed since then, most notably the 49ers have a new starting QB in Alex Smith.
Over the last few weeks, I think there's been a distinct divide in the Jimmy Raye debate. There are the folks who think he is awful and should be fired as soon as possible. They think he has no imagination and that he is just useless in creating an offense. On the other side of the debate, I believe are the folks who think the offensive woes the last few weeks should not rest on Raye's shoulders. They believe it is more an issue of execution and personnel.
I'll be honest, I fall in the latter category. I do think early in the season the offensive play-calling was horrible and Jimmy Raye was not initially adapting. However, I actually think the offense has mixed it up quite a bit in the last couple weeks. At this point I think it's simply a matter of offensive execution. We all know about the offensive line issues. The o-line has some solid moments, but there clearly are issues there that no offensive coordinator could cover up.
Additionally, I think the issues of timing in the offense have taken longer to overcome than one might hope. The team isn't learning a new offense, but they've been handed a new quarterback with different skills than the previous QB. It's taken some time to get everybody on the same page, and some of the blame for that can go with that new QB (and I know plenty of folks will heap that blame on him). Time is slowly running out so they definitely need to get their collective acts together soon.
We wrap this up after the jump with what might be the biggest complaint about Jimmy Raye...
After the Titans loss, Florida Danny pointed to probably the biggest complaint about Raye: his bizarre refusal to use his best players on some of the biggest players. Here is the first paragraph of that comment (although I recommend reading the whole thing - I added the underline in the middle):
again, fooch…i don’t think the problem with raye’s play-calling is the run-pass ratio…it’s when certain plays are called…today, it’s 4th and 1, and what’s the call? quick handoff to moran norris…what was the trick play in the game? end around to josh morgan…who was mysteriously getting carries and screen passes in the 2nd half? michael robinson and glen coffee. your best offensive players by far are frank gore, vd, and michael crabtree…it’s so obvious. design your entire offense around those 3 guys and get them the ball as much as humanly possible. if you’re going to have a limited playbook in the first place, have the entire offense funnel to those 3 guys. what i can’t freaking understand is that, @ HOU and vs. TEN, practically every play when the niners were losing in the 2nd half went to one of the offensive playmakers…but when it was still early or close late @ HOU, and when they had the lead against IND & TEN, raye decides to start involving sub-par offensive talent (aka everyone else besides the big 3), and the offense absolutely sucks because of it…and they lose games because of it.
I think this is the most logical complaint about Raye. I don't know about the mind of Raye to understand for sure, but I do think it's possible given the struggles with getting timing down between Smith and his playmakers that maybe Raye feels he needs to mix in the other players, otherwise absolutely nothing would be happening. It's speculation on my part.
37 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I want to vote undecided. I’m really not sure how much blame I should lump anywhere right now for the failures of this offense…
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
And me ...
… I think there’s so much uncertainty around this team now, that Yes and No options do not really work on either the Singletary or the Raye votes. It could not be any more uncertain could it? 4-5. Win some, lose some. Raye’s failing offense or Martz/Nolan’s failing offense that Raye needs time to resolve? Singletary is strong, disciplined, commanding of respect? All of those? But also dogmatic, inexperienced and inflexible? I don’t know. However, if we beat Green Bay, I’ll start to think I might vote to kiss both their behinds and give them both 20-year contracts. Is it wrong to be feeling mostly fickle right now?
"This could be another Very Special Team" ... Superbowl winning Niners lineman Dan Audick ...
I see your point, Fooch, that the offensive is not executing, especially the offensive line. However, there are two things about the playcalling that bug me enough to vote “No” in the poll:
1) The refusal to use Smith in the shotgun in the majority of the plays. He’s obviously more comfortable in it, and it gets rid of the few precious seconds that he takes in his normal 5 to 7-step drop. The offensive line is giving him precious little time to make his throws, and putting him in the gun would help a lot.
2) I’m really sick of how they often run the ball on first and second down, especially early in the game, and then get into a 3rd-and-long situation. From my point of view, the variety in the playcalling only seems to come when the team is down by a significant amount, or when time is running down in a half.
STEVE HOLM! refuses to be the odd man out.
by UnleashTheGore on Nov 17, 2009 11:55 AM PST reply actions
agree
with the undecided. it’s kinda hard to judge with a bad line, changing of the qbs’ & no continuity in the system. but i do think sometimes he does call the wrong play at the wrong time. i also think he does a bad job of adjusting in the game after the half. to me it seems like the offense struggles in the second half, it’s like the opponent’s D makes adjustments & raye doesn’t adjust to their adjustments then the offense is struggling in the second half. i do think raye is doing a better job of playcalling as the season goes on, except for those every-once-in-a-while calls where you think WTF!!!!. when they clear up the three probs i listed in the beginning i think his playcalling will seem better.
go niners!!! airday allday
I give him a pass
It has not been demonstrated to my satisfaction that the offense would be any better with a different playcaller.
I don’t think the criticism of him not using his “playmakers” carries much weight. If you guys can figure this out, so can the defense. It actually makes sense to use the 2nd tier in “gadget” plays… since the defense is focused on stopping the actual threats. On passing plays – there are always multiple options and I am sure that MOST of the time the first reads are on VD and Crabtree. On the 3rd and 4th and short… you might have noticed that our power run blocking is terrible. The worst in the league. And it’s not because they sometimes handoff to Norris instead of Gore.
I did think that QB sneak call was a little strange… but hard to say since he just slipped.
I am not saying Raye is great – I am saying that his talent is so sub par that it’s not really fair to expect him to eat garbage and poop out nickles.
FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.
Raye is approaching the play-calling "conceptually."
He seems to lack gut instinct and a closeness to the reality of the players. Bill Wash was accused of being overly logical too, but Raye … you’re no Bill Walsh. It is like he thinks of diagrams carrying the ball, not the players doing the work. I voted no therefore. Perhaps I’m biased by his need to be up in the booth, and he just seems unconnected.
thank you for saying what I was trying to figure out how to say
it’s like they put together a plan and just sit and watch it unfold, like the coaches are spectators. Or like the Defense is the only unit that can be coached, modified, adapted, etc. during the game.
“Well, this is what we’re going to do. If it works great. If not, we’ll rely on the defense to get the ball back for us. Then we’ll keep trying the same thing and hope it works. You know, like the definition of insanity.”
And everyone, PLEASE…stop with this “blah blah the talent isn’t that great, the o-line isn’t great so what do you expect?”
why are we rolling over? there are NO excuses that justify failure. Damnit, you figure out ways to succeed with what you’re given. You don’t wait for it to get better and make excuses. I’m sick of it. GO TO WORK AND FIND A WAY!
Singletary needs to change OC's after this season...
Or else Raye is on track to getting yet another HC fired.
Well, we're waiting....
I would agree with that...
however I would like to see the Niners have more than one season to learn a new system, and see what they can do with it. This different coordinator every season has to stop. If halfway through next year, with the same coaches and mostly the same players (get better o-linemen in the offseason), and the Niners are still struggling, then think about the switch.
by sanfranfanmdk on Nov 17, 2009 12:30 PM PST up reply actions
I havn't been a fan of Raye
but am warming up. My opinion is that Raye wasn’t adapting his play calling because his boss wanted to Fisical (with an F) football and run the ball. Once Sing warmed up to the fact that our Offensive line, was well offensive, and not the best in the league as he proclaimed they could be, we adapted.
I think this falls squarely on Singletary’s shoulders, which will show that fact when we bring back Raye next year. If it’s Raye’s fault, he will be gone, but I doubt we will see that. Sing called the game plan, Raye will be allowed another year to turn it around. Our future OC is already with the team, so give Raye another year, and then bring up Johnson.
Haven't been a fan but I vote yes
I think it takes an offense time to gel together and we just switched QB’s so the gelling process is still in the process. Once we have a GOOD offensive outing, I will see if it is fluke and followed up by an egg being layed, then I will make another decision.
"Optimist Prime"
I'll say it over and over Crabtree was not the pick we NEEDED, at least until he scores with 100yds receiving.
Struggling here
This is the problem:
1) Our team is in its first season under Jimmy Raye, so familiarity with the scheme also makes a pure evaluation of his offensive scheme play-calling difficult.
2) Our offensive line has struggled, making a pure evaluation of his offensive scheme and play-calling difficult.
3) Still, I don’t like what Jimmy Raye is doing, play-calling-wise.
4) I know that giving Jimmy Raye the boot during this year would potentially jeopardize the Niners playoff run.
5) I know that giving Jimmy Raye the boot after this year would mean that a new offensive system would have to be installed at the beginning of next season—and that would be like the 8th in 8 years (!).
6) I know that the team has earmarked Mike Johnson as Raye’s successor, and waiting to install him as the OC may cause him to get itchy feet (heck, even Norv Turner took off when SD gave him an HC position).
Result?
I don’t know what to say on this. I do wonder whether the Niners offensive philosophy is one that gets better as the season goes along—i.e. as weather and field conditions get worse and defense becomes more important.
It bears noting that I thought the team would’ve been better this year had it retained Mike Martz despite the fact that Martz was a pass-happy coordinator. Martz’s offense gave the team its highest ranking, yards-wise (23rd) since 2003. And with the complexity of his scheme, you know that the team would’ve been better in its second year under him.
Jason Hill is turning the corner!
Im undecided as well. We need the continunity though
49ers Al Grito De Guerra!!! hahaha
by 49erSalvatrucha on Nov 17, 2009 12:55 PM PST up reply actions
Fooch took the words right out of my mouth on this matter
so to speak…but i voted no.
Jimmy needs to get these guys in line. He seems like a passive coach and i get that Singletary is the motivator on this team. But he needs to get the little things going. Timing is still off on way too many passing routes this far into the season. I get that Crabs and Alex havnt been starting very long at all, but he needs to get this offense planted and installed before expanding it too fast.
Im seeing new plays each game,and thats good and all… but i still dont see the older more foundation type plays of this offense successful. One perfect example is the WR screen. I remember seeing this play in week 2 or 3 with Morgan being the reciever. Its now week 10, and even with the addition of the perfect reciever for this play (Crabtree)…it has done nothing but flash potential and end in failure. There is STILL terrible execution on this play. All im saying is…how about getting a few plays that continually get positive yards for this team at the right situations. LETS GET SOME BREAD AND BUTTER PLAYS PLEASE. Make them run that damn WR screen 50 times untill they get it right Jimmy.
More approval rating ideas...
Jed York Approval Rating: not so much in the sense of green little Jed Jr.’s performance, but in his choice of suits, ties, and when to sport the short beard.
ScotM Approval Rating: This is more of a countdown to whether he gets praise or blame, depending on the outcome of the season, or Smith finally proves bust for the umpteenth time.
Mike Williams Approval Rating: Thumbs down from me because I’m sick of all those “HIT ’EM IN THE MOUTH” promos. He needs better schtick.
Andy Dolich Approval Rating: Big thumbs up from me. Mostly because of Jerry West, Memphis Grizzlies, and Pau Gasol. Forget about what he does with the 49ers (what does he do anyway?).
Well, we're waiting....
Benefit of the doubt
I’m still in the “wait and see” camp. He created/was given a mandate in the off-season to build the team around Gore and a smash mouth running game, and guess what – as it turns out, they didn’t have an O-Line that could even begin to execute that sort of game plan, and anybody paying attention knew it was a matter of time before Frank Gore got injured, or started piling up 40 yard games. Seems to me they’ve done what they had to do – they’ve switched gears and realized their best chance to win is a balanced attack that takes advantage of Gore’s power, Davis’ improved pass catching abilities, Crabtree’s ability to stretch the field, and Smith’s comfort in more of a spread attack. Those are major changes to implement in mid-season, especially when two of those players weren’t even in your plans in September…
The real mistake in all this, to me, is the ‘niners lack of vision in camp. Did they really think they’d be able to “run the offense through 21”, as Raye stated at the time? It seemed pretty apparent from the beginning that the O-Line, especially the right side, was suspect. Did they see something no one else did, or were they engaging in wishful thinking? I actually give Singletary and Raye credit for having the humility to admit the mistake, and change the offense as necessary to suit the talent they have and give themselves a chance to win. But…. how did they not know in August?
So all that said, I think you have to wait and see. Seems to me they’re actually doing the right thing – shifting the game plan to suit the talent they have – and because they didn’t make that shift until week seven, they’re/we’re going to have to suffer through a learning curve. If they haven’t found a groove by the last month of the season, I’ll probably join those in the “disapprove” camp, but…. I’d hate to see another ’niner “do-over” in ’10, if at the end of the day what ’s really wrong can be solved with ONE genuine right tackle.
what's weird is that last few years
the run blocking of the line has been good. But apparently it got old/bad/free-agented up pretty quick.
FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.
I think the run blocking was good mostly due to having Larry Allen
he couldn’t pass-block, but nobody run-blocks better than Larry. Opposing players were still getting Allen-itis whenever they faced him on running plays
I voted no
though I’m mostly undecided. The playcalling the first couple of games was atrocious. Thankfully we had a stellar defense that stepped up to give us some wins. The play calling has gotten much better. We’ve been able to put together some long drives but rarely do those drives score.
I think that rests on the play calling as much as the execution. When a long drive fizzles out I have to blame the playcalling because the players were obviously executing very well to that point.
I want to see us finish drives and finish games.
I don't think Raye trusts the o-line...
and because of that, I give him the benefit of the doubt. Sometimes they show up & sometimes they don’t. It’s hard enough for an offense to ‘execute’ plays when your o-line is only so-so and that isn’t Jimmy Raye’s fault. My solution: either fire the o-line coach or else find o-linemen who will consistently get the job done.
One other thing I’d like to say: Swapping out Offensive Coordinators every season doesn’t solve anything. By now, I’d have thought we’d of had enough of that crazy merry-go-round. I mean seriously, what’s the point in learning an offense if it isn’t gonna be there the following year??? We practically go through O-coordinators like a book of matches. One and done. Has it ever donned on anybody that maybe every once in a while, taking the wait-&-see approach might not hurt?
I don't approve of Raye's calls and voted no.
However, the team needs continuity with the coaching staff to minimize the execution errors they have been plagued with. The players have to utilize the game plan and make the necessary plays within that plan in order to win. The coaching staff needs to make a game plan that utilizes the players strengths and the opponents weaknesses in real time situations in order to win. Jimmy Raye has a bland offensive football stratagy which is sometimes difficult to watch but the team doesn’t need the revolving door routine with the coaching staff that we have seen in prior years.
I voted no. Why?
Because time and time again I have seen this team fail to finish, and more often than not, it’s the play call I’m scratching my head over. And I’m not just talking about the Vikings game: hell, even last week, a game we won, had me screaming at the set.
I understand clock management is incredibly important, and that taking risks that backfire get you blasted like Belichick this week. On the other hand, taking risks and making the right move gets you things like trophies and stuff. You know, just sayin’.
I’m not as ultra-stat nerd as most of the folks here (and I love reading all of your posts so much that I rarely say anything myself), but one thing I do know is that Alex Smith is not (as Chicago fans once said of Kyle Orton) a “dink-and-dunk” quarterback. He can do it, sometimes, but when you’re passing up opportunities to let him shine in favor of what you think is the “safe” call, you’re already pissing me off.
Just because you’re calling plays out of the shotgun doesn’t mean you’re calling the right plays for Alex Smith. I know it sounds like a cliche post from some guy who doesn’t know what he’s talking about when I say this, but this guy needs to air it out, and Jimmy Raye just doesn’t call the deep ball enough.
We have the most difficult man to single-cover in the NFC, and maybe the entire league. We have a great receiving backfield, an incredibly talented rookie wideout who has already made NFL corners miss, and a quarterback who is only comfortable starting a play from six yards behind the line. It ain’t rocket surgery: throw the damn ball.
I don’t want to replace Raye with Holmgren, but I’d like to see an offense that at least looks like they’re trying to let Alex shine. He ain’t Shaun Hill Turbo, guys. He’s Alex Smith.
Five...Five Cutler...Five Cutler Pickoffs....
who?
is the most difficult player to single cover in the league? surely he’s not a niner!
NO!
I loved J Raye in the early going. He played conservative, clock eating, field position football. His game plan seemed to consider the defensive unit as a part of our offensive unit. We didn’t turn the ball over. Conservative, smart football. Defend long fields. Get the ball back somewhere nice…like midfield. simple. :)
What happened to that guy!?!? Now, because we have a new QB, we have to run an entirely different offense? He’s not a very good QB!!! Why are we continually putting the ball up 25+ times a game? How many short fields have we had to defend in the last few weeks?
I think it’s great that we have a guy who can get the ball downfield to a young guy like Crabs. But, I would prefer to see this offense lure the defense in, and hit them over the top. keep them honest, and run the ball hard at their teeth. wear them down, and win the game. that’s all I want, and that’s what I though Jimmy Raye was meant to be.
so, he’s no longer a no.
mark my words, if this team continues to throw the ball 25+ times a game, we will not break .500.
Big Yes for Jimmy Raye. No one has anything substantial to hold against him.
The 49ers offensive numbers are all improved from last season. The numbers say it’s a better passing team than under Martz and slightly worse running team than under Norv Turner.
He’s done this with his three of his four best offensive players missing multiple games: Gore, Staley and Crabtree. Not to mention a QB switch in the middle. The only additions to the offense from the previous season where Moran Norris (spot player), Glen Coffee (backup) and Crabtree (starter).
What kind of improvement did you reasonably expect? The offense had been bottom of the barrel for two previous season and they have improved to below average without really changing the personnel.
There was a good clip of Dick Vermeil from his time back in Philly where he was addressing the press about the fans displeasure at QB. To paraphrase because I couldn’t fin the quote, “Fans have been getting away with picking the QB here for years . . . they have yet to find one.”
good quote
we picked Alex.
and now the rest of the NFL is picking him.
As a side note, Alex has not played a single game without a pick. Shaun Hill had 3 games without an INT….all wins.
Passing numbers..
Really stem from the 49ers having to throw post Hill while behind like they were in HOU. Before that, it was pretty horrid, and the 3rd down conversion ratio was also horrid. That’s substantial enough. Besides, Martz got more out of lesser player while those same players have dissapeard under Raye. Everybody thought the 49er had a good WR before this season started, now people like yourself are dismissing them outside of Crabtree. The run game numbers are also inflated due to big hme runs from Gore. Outside of those, Gore was ineffective. The only real impact this season as opposed to last is VD. That’s it.
Well, we're waiting....
I voted yes, but
I’m more with the others on the undecided thing. I can’t say no because of the good things he’s done and for this game, I most loved the Niners’ final drive despite it not netting us any points (though we could’ve had points). Because it went in the face of all the criticism he’s been having and the execution response was 11 plays eating up 6 minutes with the first 5 plays being all run plays.
I can’t fully say yes because there has to be something said about winning the turnover war that big and only showing 10 points for it (though I’m more inclined to pin that on Nedney than anyone else). Still, it wasn’t satisfactory and an offensive performance that needs to be better against Green Bay.
Can't Blame Jimmy
For a weak O-line.
Sometimes I do scratch my head at the play calls. I think the system is a good match for our team. I’d like to see less run on first and second, pass on third.
Looking to put San Fran*six-o* here some time soon!
Can't blame him for the o-line sucking but....
what is he doing to succeed in spite of that? what is he doing to give us plays that help overcome that?
I Hear You
But what play would you call for an O-Line that can’t block? They can’t RUN block. It seems like it’s the guard play more than the tackles. I’m sure an offensive genius could do more with Jimmy’s play book and our talent than Jimy could, but for continuity’s sake I hope we can just have the same OC for TWO years…
-d
Looking to put San Fran*six-o* here some time soon!
one to three step drops
quick slants, hooks. anything to keep the LB’s backed off a little. That opens up the run game and get’s them guessing. point is, there’s always an opening on the field. find it.

by 































