Football Outsiders and the 49ers: Team Stats through Week 10
After a bit of a hiatus for the purposes of working on my actual dissertation (as opposed to my weekly Niners Nation ones), I'm back in the saddle for the rest of the season. To some of you, this will bring great joy; to others, great consternation. Either way, expect to be seeing a lot of posts from me for the next 7 weeks (and more?).
Before I get started with the team rankings, I just want to give you guys a heads up on my new and improved posting schedule, which results from (a) the fact that all of Football Outsiders' (FO) stats now have a high enough sample size to be considered trustworthy, and (b) trying to cut down on the length of my aforementioned dissertations. Here's the new schedule that will begin after this week's Packers game:
|
Day |
Description |
Stats Presented |
|
Wednesday |
Singletary's Formula for Success |
|
|
Thursday |
Team Stats & Rankings |
|
|
Saturday |
Player Stats & Rankings |
|
|
Sunday |
DVOA Game Matchup |
|
As I said, this schedule begins next week. Hopefully, it'll accomplish my two stated goals of (a) providing you with more - and more-relevant - statistical information about the 49ers, and (b) cut down on the length of each individual post.
As for this week, I'm just going to do this team rankings post (without any of the situational splits) and the game matchup post (with some of the situational splits). The game matchup post will be up on Friday so you have two full days to argue about how the 49ers are going to win because of the matchups or how the 49ers are going to win despite the matchups.
OK, housekeeping is done. Vamos!
After the jump, I'll present the 49ers' stats and rankings through 9 games...
TEAM RANKINGS
Here are the 49ers' overall team DVOAs and rankings (bold = top 8 in the NFL; italics = bottom 8):
|
Total |
Rank |
Offense |
Rank |
Defense |
Rank |
Special Teams |
Rank |
|
-0.8% |
20 |
-12.9% |
24 |
-13.0% |
2 |
-0.9% |
22 |
|
Total VOA |
Rank |
SOS |
Rank |
Variance |
Rank |
|
|
|
-5.9% |
21 |
1.4% |
14 |
9.4% |
11 |
|
|
Since last we spoke (after Week 7), the 49ers have improved by 5.5% in overall efficiency. However, what might come as a surprise to you is that this improvement has come entirely on the back of the DEF, not the OFF. Indeed, whereas the OFF has actually gotten 2.0% worse since Alex Smith became the starter, the DEF is now 6.9% better than they were after 6 games. A lot of this has to do with the fact that the Smith-led pass OFF didn't do much of anything against the 22nd- and 28th-ranked pass DEFs in the NFL (Bears & Titans, respectively), while the Niners' pass DEF basically shut down the #4 pass OFF (Colts) and took care of business against the #22 pass OFF (CHI). So basically, strength of schedule (SOS) plays a big role here.
Speaking of SOS, you can see its recent effect on team efficiency via 2 other stats in the table. Directly, the Niners SOS has gotten more difficult since Week 7, going from an average of 0.5% to the 1.4% shown in the table. More indirectly, however, the effect of SOS reveals itself in the difference between TOT DVOA and unadjusted TOT VOA. Whereas SOS (and game situations) positively affected the Niners' TOT DVOA by only 2.7% after 6 games, there's now a 5.1% difference between their TOT DVOA and TOT VOA.
In other words, the Niners would be a better-looking team than they've shown - albeit still only an average one - if they'd been playing an easier schedule through their first 9 games. Don't fret, though. Help is on the way. According to FO, the 49ers' opponents over the remainder of their schedule currently average -5.0% in TOT DVOA, which gives them the 7th-easiest remaining schedule in the NFL.
Finally, in case you're wondering, the 49ers are ranked behind the Dolphins (13th) and the Jets (19th) among the five 4-5 teams. In addition, among NFC West teams, they're ranked below the Cardinals (10th), but above both the Seahawks (23rd) and Rams (29th).
OFFENSIVE RANKINGS - OVERALL
Here' how the offensive rankings look overall and by type of play (bold = top 8 in the NFL; italics = bottom 8):
|
OFF |
Rank |
Pass |
Rank |
Run |
Rank |
Variance |
Rank |
|
-12.9% |
24 |
-6.5% |
23 |
-6.7% |
26 |
4.4% |
7 |
|
OFF VOA |
Rank |
Pass VOA |
Rank |
Run VOA |
Rank |
|
|
|
-8.8% |
24 |
-0.7% |
22 |
-4.6% |
23 |
|
|
Overall, the OFF has pretty much remained a well below-average unit. However, what's most interesting about these stats is the seeming effect of Smith's ascension to starting QB. Namely, it's pretty clear from the stats that Smith has actually helped the run OFF more than he has the pass OFF: when compared to their stats after 6 games, the pass OFF is now 12.1% worse while the run OFF is now 14.2% better.
How can this be? Well, as reluctant as I am to do so, I have to give props to my you're-not-a-real-Niner-fan-if-you-draft-Cardinals-Seahawks-or-Rams-in-fantasy-football friend; the one I've mentioned before on NN with whom I have to sit through every Niner game (and dodge flying objects as they're hurled past me towards the TV screen). The whole time Shaun Hill was starting, he'd repeatedly tell me that the Niners couldn't run the ball because opposing safeties were giving no respect to the threat of a deep pass. He'd point out to me that opposing safeties were constantly lining up 10 yards or closer to the line of scrimmage because Hill couldn't throw the ball farther than that on any given play, and that that was the reason the OFF couldn't run the ball worth a damn. "Put in Alex Smith, already, so we get these safeties playing honest!" he'd say. "Brotha, it's just that the OL sucks!" I'd retort...
And then Smith got put in against HOU. The effect was almost immediate. We literally watched as the Texans safeties started lining up the usual 15-20 yards downfield, and this phenomenon has continued for the past 3 games. Needless to say, I've eaten my share of crow on this one - in addition to the crow I'd already eaten for drafting Larry Fitzgerald. So, consider me a convert. I really believe that starting Smith, and changing the OFF to more of a Smith-friendly shotgun spread look, has opened up the running lanes for Frank Gore because (a) the safeties have to actually worry about the deep pass now, and (b) increased use of the shotgun formation has eliminated Jimmy Raye telegraphing Gore's carries. Now if they could just get the whole "passing out of a passing formation" thing down, they'd be on their way to GoodOffenseLand.
I know I said I wasn't going to include any situational splits in this post, but it's relevant to my friend's my argument here to show the shotgun vs. non-shotgun splits through 9 games, and see how they compare with the same splits through 6 games:
|
% of Plays in Shotgun |
Rank |
Shotgun DVOA |
Rank |
Non-Shotgun DVOA |
Rank |
Difference |
Rank |
|
37.1% |
17 |
-2.1% |
22 |
-17.7% |
28 |
15.6% |
16 |
With Smith at the helm, the 49ers' OFF has moved up 4 spots in the %-of-Plays-in-Shotgun rankings, going from 34.7% to 37.1%. Furthermore, compared to their stats after Week 7, their Shotgun DVOA is now 4.6% worse, their Non-Shotgun DVOA is now 1.6% worse, and their Shotgun-vs.-Non-Shotgun Difference is now 3.0% lower. Although it might seem counterintuitive, these stats actually reinforce my argument: The Niners' OFF has used the shotgun formation a lot more with Smith, which has made the overall OFF worse, but only because it's the run OFF (i.e., the part of the OFF weighed less heavily in DVOA), not the pass OFF, that has benefitted from more cowbell shotgun. In the comments section, let me know whether you agree or disagree. Circle gets the square.
DEFENSIVE RANKINGS - OVERALL
Here' how the defensive rankings look overall and by type of play (bold = top 8 in the NFL; italics = bottom 8):
|
DEF |
Rank |
Pass |
Rank |
Run |
Rank |
Variance |
Rank |
|
-13.0% |
2 |
-7.2% |
8 |
-20.4% |
3 |
8.0% |
24 |
|
DEF VOA |
Rank |
Pass VOA |
Rank |
Run VOA |
Rank |
|
|
|
-3.5% |
11 |
9.6% |
16 |
-20.4% |
3 |
|
|
There are only a couple of bits of commentary required here. First, and most obviously, dang that Niner D is awesome!!!
Second, we can really see in this table how well the DEF has performed given the high caliber of opponents they've faced. Specifically, SOS has had a 9.5% effect on their DEF DVOA and a whopping 16.8% effect on their Pass DEF DVOA. Basically, the 49ers' DEF has played a killer schedule when it comes to defending the pass: their opponents' average Pass OFF DVOA this season is 20.6%, with an average ranking of 13th. Furthermore, they've played 4 teams (HOU, IND, Vikings, & ARI) that are in the top 8 in pass OFF efficiency, with an average Pass OFF DVOA of - totally not joking here - 46.6%!!!
My third comment has to do with the peculiar timing of the pass DEF's improvement. Basically, I have to wonder if it's a coincidence that, when compared to the first 6 games, the pass DEF has improved by 10.0% in the past 3 games, and that Nate Clements got injured in the Niners' 7th game. In other words, the pass DEF's improvement eerily coincides with Clements' being removed from the field. Now, I know it's way too simplistic to reduce the reasons for improvement down to only one thing, and I know my thinking is probably clouded by an anti-Nate bias over-reliance on statistical evidence, so I welcome your theories in the comments section.
Finally, looking at the table, dang that Niner D is awesome!!! Oh wait, I already said that.
SPECIAL TEAMS RANKINGS
Below are the Niners' ST DVOA stats broken down by unit:
|
ST |
Rank |
FG/XP |
Rank |
Kickoff |
Rank |
Punt |
Rank |
|
-0.9% |
22 |
-1.2 |
20 |
-0.1 |
20 |
10.5 |
1 |
|
ST VOA |
Rank |
|
|
Kickoff Return |
Rank |
Punt Return |
Rank |
|
-0.6% |
23 |
|
|
-4.1 |
24 |
-7.9 |
31 |
Since Week 7, the ST has improved slightly overall (+0.9%), and has improved a lot on kickoff coverage (+2.6 total points of field position). And, of course, Andy Lee - aka our hero - and company have retaken their rightful place as the best punt coverage unit in the NFL. However, a rash of missed FGs by Joe Nedney, a revolving door at kick returner, and having a punt returner that doesn't seem to want to actually, you know, return a punt, have all conspired to make the FG, kickoff return, and punt return units decline in recent weeks. I never thought I'd say this, but, I long for the days of Allen Rossum.
BOTTOM LINE
OK, so through 9 games, we can draw the following conclusions about the 2009 49ers:
- Mediocrity still rules the day.
- The biggest beneficiary of Smith's promotion seems to have been...Frank Gore.
- Dang that Niner D is awesome!!!
- The biggest side of effect of Clements getting hurt...improved pass defense.
- The Niners have played a brutal schedule thus far, but their remaining schedule is a piece of cake.
- Memo to Brandon Jones: You're back there to actually field and return punts, not watch them bounce and roll inside the 20.
Remember, game matchup post this Friday. Argue with Talk to you then.
*DVOA statistics used to produce this article were obtained from Football Outsiders.
0 recs |
88 comments
|
Comments
That's another one on the GM
At this point I should put together a list of his free agent failures, so far this season it’s pretty substantial.
Let’s not forget that Nolan had a big say in FA acquisitions prior to last offseason. I’m not saying we don’t need a new/better GM, I’m just saying Nolan had a huge role in the past. McCloughan ran this year’s draft and FA pursuit, and last year’s draft and FA pursuit as the GM. The year’s prior he wasn’t the GM, he was the head of Player Scouting/Personnel.
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 19, 2009 4:09 PM PST up reply actions
last year
was when Smith signed, right? this is just his second season with the team? I thought Scot took over in that offseason as GM, which prevented Nolan getting the axe for an extra few months.
we can’t give him credit for Franklin though, that’s a Baltimore guy brought over by Nolan.
But yeah, there isn’t a lot of credit to McCloughan’s tenure. Drafting Crabtree was pure luck for the most part, and not getting an OT in the draft hurts. Putting stock in Marvel Smith was seriously questionable (even though I was hopeful for it), but at the same time, adding Pashos was nice (but again, mostly luck).
Maybe Holmgren can come to town as a Parcells type guy, and bring himself a GM and Scout.
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 19, 2009 4:17 PM PST up reply actions
2009 Free Agent Class
Marvel Smith
Brandon Jones (0 catches . . . . ZERO!!!!!!!!!!!! What else has a zero, Week 10!)
Damon Huard
Allen Rossum
Demetric Evans
Marquis I think, . . . no I know I forgot his name.
Not bringing in a backup plan for Takeo Spikes (he gets hurt often).
I’m sure I am forgetting a few more. Moran Norris was Sing’s call.
His best signings were Dre Bly (nickel back) and Tony Pashos in OMG desperation.
I know he said something about building through the draft but he’s taking it to a ridiculous level.
Dre Bly was not a good signing.
You can never resist the game... nor could I... we're the same, so don't even try.
They drafted Scott Mckillop...
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by chikmagnet_565 on Nov 19, 2009 8:31 PM PST up reply actions
Don't get me started
Our 3rd best ILB was sitting in his garage in Ohio working out on a Bowflex three weeks ago.
hey
how do you know it was a bowflex?
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 20, 2009 7:00 AM PST up reply actions
Going to give all the stats a look in a short while..
Just wanted to point out that I voted for the Tarell Brown option… the guy is the future.
You can never resist the game... nor could I... we're the same, so don't even try.
I think you should have your summary in PowerPoint bullets:
- Mediocrity: Rules the Day
- Gore: Helped by Smith
- Defense: Awesome!
- Clements hurt: Good for defense!
- Past Schedule: Bad! Future Schedule: Good
- Brandon Jones: Sucks
Also you forgot one other stat… % chance (by FO) of the Niners making the playoffs: 18%
FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.
don't want to...
incite a mass suicide here. :-)
by Florida Danny on Nov 19, 2009 3:44 PM PST up reply actions
you must be speaking of the other side of the bay lol.. i heard the Raiders chances of making in through the entire season without forfeiting is 18%..
I wonder what the percentage of the Colts beating the Patriots was when there was only about 4-5 min left down by two scores..
79% remember
Of course they were comparing hypothetical situation data for going for it compared to real data accumulated from punting in the same situation.
Take it to the Bank
The most important part about any stat is the write up about how they put it together.
18% Playoff Chance
I saw that table, the 49ers are ranked the 9th most likely to make the playoffs in the NFC.
yup.. the division leaders are the Saints, Cardinals, Vikings, and Cowboys. So there is the top 4 prospects to go to the playoffs.. the next 4 fighting for 2 wildcard positions are the Eagles, Falcons, Packers, Giants. Coming up we play 2 of those teams.. this week against the Packers and week 15 against the Eagles. If we come out with wins in both of those games I’m sure we’ll make the playoffs. My explanation for that is this… the rest of the season the teams we play are: vs Jaguars, @ Seahawks, vs Cardinals, vs Lions, @ Rams. I see us winning all of those games. Jaguars are doing pretty well but they still have a terrible defense. The Seahawks haven’t played well all year other than the Rams, Lions and the Jaguars whom we all play. Cardinals are currently our number 1 rivals, “I’m sure you all can agree with me on that” and this game will be at home on a Monday night and could decide who will take the NFC West division, a must win and we will do just that. The Lions.. need i say more. The Rams.. Week 4 anyone lol
It’s a possibility we can go 11-5.. I decided to make the Eagles game winnable after much thought and realizing “oh, the Raiders beat them”. If not than 10-6 should get us in the playoffs.
I'm not writing off the Rams as a for sure win
not if the same team that played New Orleans showed up, shows up. Plus, it’s in St. Louis on the last week of the season. Remember last year’s 17-16 squeaker in St. Louis after thromping the Rams at home?
Our schedule is tough, not bad, but tough. There are a bunch of winnable games, but this team in the past has not won the “winnable” games when it mattered most. They have to start by beating Green Bay this weekend, which in my opinion, is a winnable game.
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 19, 2009 4:12 PM PST up reply actions
I remember the Titans being 13-3 last year with a beast named Chris Johnson and the Texans having a monster passing game along with a pretty good running back last year…. We assumed those games would be winnable but those teams unfortunately became the teams they were last year right when we played them… I remember the Rams as 2-14 last year and striving to be even worst this year.. I don’t know how you can Compare Houston and Tennessee to the Rams.. nice try though
Prior to those games..
Fans here were calling them “winnable”. Just as much as a game is “winnable” it could just as “losable”. The true measure of where a team is is in the months of OCT and NOV. So far, the 49ers haven’t fared well in those 2 months. The 49ers only dominated one half of football against a poorer team in the Rams. Which was the second half.
Well, we're waiting....
I’d prefer 2nd half over 1st half any day.. but i see your point.. I’m just a optimist using stats to make me look more of a stats guy than optimistic guy.. but darn the 49ers need to when this game.. needs are always more important than wants.. so hopefully they say “we need” this game more than they say " we want" this game
The Packers aren’t that good of a team “thanks the Rodgers”.. and if i recall Rodgers will be playing this week and my sources tell me that he likes to drop back and run around till he gets sacked so I’m sure we’ll have some fun with that.. I wouldn’t be surprised if everyone of our D lineman including one of our safeties and a LB gets a sack each .. yes that means 7-8 sacks and I see that happening.. our defense is scarier than it looks.. and even more punishable than it looks..
Is this in honor...
…of Timmy’s second Cy Young?
I knew it all along...
Always the musicians. ;-)
by Brendan Scolari on Nov 21, 2009 12:17 AM PST up reply actions
I voted pass rush
Putting pressure on the QB causes him to throw the ball away early leading to poor throws and easier interceptions.
How much did the 5 interceptions against Chicago bump up the pass defense rating?
well...
their pass defense DVOA for the CHI game was -38.3%, which was their 2nd-best game of the season behind a -42.9% effort vs. STL. they’ve actually had 4 games this season with a pass defense DVOA better than -30% and 5 total that were better than average (i.e., below 0%).
back to the CHI game, i think their pass def DVOA for that game would have been a lot better had it not been for the fact that they were going against such a piss-poor passing team. i mean, cutler is the most philanthropic chicagoan since john d. and catherine t. macarthur.
by Florida Danny on Nov 19, 2009 3:52 PM PST up reply actions
Speaking of the shotgun Matt Maiocco tweeted this:
In past 2 games, 49ers RB Frank Gore had 40 rushes for 187 yards. Of those, 16 att for 112 yds have come from shotgun formation.
Looks like his YPA is much better when we rush from the shotgun. Here’s hoping Raye implements more of it.
That’s an average of 8 attempts per game out of the shotgun, there’s certainly no reason to increase that, other wise the effectiveness will decrease. I’m surprised he’s been that successful in that amount of attempts, but a big chunk came on that 25 yard run last week.
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 19, 2009 3:44 PM PST up reply actions
How do you know...
…that efficiency will decrease?
the more the defense sees it coming, the better they will stop runs out of the shotgun formation. they’ve picked opportune times to run out of the shotgun formation, and have been fairly unpredictable (even with 16 attempts).
Running out of the shotgun typically isn’t something teams want to do often, because they want it to be effective when do actually run from the formation. I suppose there’s no guarantee the effectiveness will decrease, I just like the balance where it’s at. Sixteen attempts out of the shotgun is a pretty high number, I don’t think there needs to be more.
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 19, 2009 7:24 PM PST up reply actions
What you say...
…makes total intuitive sense. I just wonder if there’s any kind of empirical research that clearly show diminishing returns at a certain break point (e.g., more than 40% of runs from shotgun) the way, say, research suggests that 2nd and 5 is a magic number because the odds of converting a first down are higher than 50%.
Florida Danny…are you reading this?
I have voted yet
I’m trying to consider the options a little more before I make my vote count. I’m leaning towards “other” and specifying “Aubrayo Franklin”.
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 19, 2009 3:45 PM PST reply actions
I ended up going with other
and Aubrayo Franklin. The pressure has helped, but the fact that Franklin occupies two blockers each time he’s on the field makes it a lot easier for the other guys to get pressure. Franklin has just 3 pressures, but the guy named Justin Smith has 24 pressures and 11 QB hits. He wouldn’t be doing that if it weren’t for Franklin, and he’ll be the first to admit to that fact.
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 19, 2009 3:50 PM PST up reply actions
Roman
I imagine it’s people trying to rile you up. HAS to be!
by David Fucillo (Fooch) on Nov 19, 2009 3:59 PM PST up reply actions
damn it man
why’d you post that? it makes me want to scream “JUST GRAB HIS LEG AND FORCE HIM OUT OF BOUNDS!!!!”
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 19, 2009 4:13 PM PST up reply actions
Excellent marks if they were figure skating.
by bignerd on Nov 19, 2009 4:17 PM PST up reply actions 3 recs
don't forget about...
the niners offensive mascot…syphilis sid!

by Florida Danny on Nov 19, 2009 4:58 PM PST up reply actions
syphillis sid...
is particularly fond of “tight ends” named VD and “wide receivers” named crabs.
by Florida Danny on Nov 19, 2009 5:28 PM PST up reply actions
perhaps...
the 7-year itch? given that it looks like smith is going to take 7 years to become a competent NFL QB?
by Florida Danny on Nov 19, 2009 5:34 PM PST up reply actions
even...
a broken clock is right twice a day. :-)
by Florida Danny on Nov 19, 2009 7:28 PM PST up reply actions
Not if it’s one of those military clocks.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Nov 19, 2009 8:07 PM PST up reply actions
W.T.F ???....
Heck, I forgot. It’s SF.
Might as well have Herpes Harry, Smokey the Crackhead, Panhandler Pete, Tori the Tranny , and Che Guevara on the sideline too.
Well, we're waiting....
I just don’t know where you are going with that reference?
Militant, angry young men?
Socialism, Communism?
Or a simple lots of Mexicans blast . . . you are in SoCal, I know how they feel?
It refers to..
all of the pseudo hippie progressives that wear Che t-shirts all over the Haight.
Well, we're waiting....
I think the hoping was for the hope that Obama would become president.. now that he is we don’t have to hope for him to be president anymore since he already is.. Kind of like when your pray for something and something of equal goodness happens to you.. you don’t have to pray anymore for that certain thing lol
LOL
49ers Al Grito De Guerra!!! hahaha
by 49erSalvatrucha on Nov 19, 2009 8:44 PM PST up reply actions
Yup he sucks
49ers Al Grito De Guerra!!! hahaha
by 49erSalvatrucha on Nov 19, 2009 8:44 PM PST up reply actions
All I think when I see this is.....
just PUSH him out of bounds!!!!! lol
by sanfranfanmdk on Nov 19, 2009 5:22 PM PST up reply actions
Mark Roman doing his best RedMan impression from How High
“I’m a ghost ghost ghost…”
OTHER
The defense has played well together as a unit. They believe in themselves. The offense seems to have no idea of what they are doing. Poor quarterback play again and again has drained the offensive spirit, to the point we are suppose to accept yuck as good. NO I WON’T. QUARTERBACK PLAY IS HORRIBLE.
Or should it be: shh: don’t tell anyone; some QBs know the game AND have skills. Quiet, we might upset the GM and Coach.
What do you guys think of this?
Top 9 NFC Teams
Saints 15-1
Vikings 14-2
Cowboys 10-6
Cardinals 10-6
Eagles 9-7
Falcons 9-7
Packers 8-8
Giants 10-6
49ers 10-6
Division Winners
Saints
Vikings
49ers
Giants
Wild Card
Cowboys
Cardinals
What you guys think of the predictions?
I don’t think the 49ers and Cardinals can have the same record with the Cardinals winning the division.
huh?
He has 49ers winning the div.
"Optimist Prime"
I'll say it over and over Crabtree was not the pick we NEEDED, at least until he scores with 100yds receiving.

by 


































