Packers 30 - 49ers 24: A tale of two offenses
That headline could very easily include a whole lot of cursing. This game was SO incredibly frustrating. The 49ers offense was absolutely abysmal for about three-quarters of the game. Then, when the team had fallen far behind, the offense opened up and suddenly was moving the ball with ease. This led to another big game from Vernon Davis, Michael Crabtree's first career touchdown, and all our hopes raised, only to be smacked down yet again.
The fourth quarter of this game raises a variety of questions related to the offense. Were those last two touchdowns more garbage TDs, or did the offense show the potential it could have over the course of a full game? The team looks great running a shotgun offense, but is that something they could run for a vast majority of the game? I know people are demanding this kind of play-calling, but can a spread-style shotgun offense be effective for 4 quarters? I guess one answer to that is: might as well try it.
On to the good, the bad and the ugly...
The Good
Michael Crabtree - The young wide receiver is certainly showing he's a player in this league. Even though Crabtree is not putting up 100+ yards and multiple TDs a game (as some might want), he's showing an amazing ability to make the tough catches that truly great wide receivers make. It's still early in his young career, but if you're doubting Crabtree at this point, I don't know what else to tell you.
Vernon Davis - While he probably shouldn't have ducked on that Smith interception (unless it really was meant for Delanie Walker), Davis had another huge game for the 49ers with a big touchdown to cut it to a 2 possession game in the fourth quarter. Given that only one play (the over the middle pass) seems to work for Smith-Davis, I don't think we can question Vernon Davis's toughness at this point. He gets popped on those catches and always holds on to the ball now. Good stuff.
Josh Morgan kick returner - He's regressed as a receiver, but he had a big kick return for the 49ers in the fourth quarter. I wouldn't be surprised to see Morgan get more chances as a return man. It's overreacting to think this at this juncture, but maybe he can be that John Taylor return man.
The Good and Bad
Alex Smith - I can't stick Smith in the bad and I can't stick him in the good, so he gets his own special category. Smith struggled a lot for 3/4 of the game, before finally making some impressive throws late in the game. Part of the blame does fall on Smith for the struggles, but the offensive line also gets a lot of blame. Maybe going to that shotgun spread is the best option. Then any runs go on direct snaps to Gore?
The Bad
4th quarter defense - Yes, they finally got sacks on Aaron Rodgers, but they could not make the stop on multiple chances on that last drive. Great defenses get either a 3 and out, or at the very least 3 and out after a first down. They were probably incredibly tired given all the time they spent on the field, but in that last drive, there are no excuses.
The Ugly
LOLffensive Line - As mentioned above, Alex Smith deserves plenty of blame, but the LOLffensive line deserves more of the blame. There were numerous instances where Smith would drop back and as he was going to look down field he'd be sacked within .5 seconds. It's safe to say LOL coach Chris Foerster is on the hot seat. There have been injuries, but adjustments need to be made (so blame Raye as well).
Tackling - Just horrendous tackling by the 49ers defense today. Most of the Packer touchdowns seemed to come after horrific tackling by the 49ers. Even Patrick Willis was missing tackles. When that's happening, something is clearly amiss.
Brief Look Ahead
Week 12 - vs. Jacksonville - The Jaguars pulled out a last second win over the Buffalo Bills and continue their bizarre run, as they now stand 6-4. I'm amazed how well they've played. This is a home game, but the 49ers are going to have their work cut out for them. The run defense has really struggled, and Maurice Jones-Drew could do some bad things if it doesn't improve soon.
384 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I got nothing...
Seriously, I don’t know what to think about this team.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Nov 22, 2009 1:38 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
This shows flashes and then just falls short. Smith played a decent game but the LOLoline and the defense let us down.
49ers Al Grito De Guerra!!! hahaha
by 49erSalvatrucha on Nov 22, 2009 1:40 PM PST up reply actions
he played a decent 4th quarter. the rest of the game
he was making bad reads, locking on, and holding the ball
I thought he looked pretty good
the whole 2nd half, excepting the Int.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
Re: the int
I’m pretty sure it was intended for Walker, who took a TERRIBLE route.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
re: the shotgun
we ran out of the shotgun effectively last week. I don’t see why running the shotgun spread precludes the possibility of a run except on direct snaps.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
I didn’t notice the wildcat this week. Did they try it at all?
If Bochy coached the Warriors Bengie Molina would start every game at PG.
by cybermaldonado on Nov 22, 2009 1:42 PM PST up reply actions
once
it got 3 yards.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
As much as I hate to say it ;
The tackeling sucked long and hard today.
but can a spread-style shotgun offense be effective for 4 quarters? I guess one answer to that is: might as well try it.
Didn’t they try this against the Titans? Alex threw a bunch of INT that game, but I think they were kinda fluky, and also that was his first start.
If Bochy coached the Warriors Bengie Molina would start every game at PG.
if only we had a line……
49ers Al Grito De Guerra!!! hahaha
by 49erSalvatrucha on Nov 22, 2009 1:42 PM PST up reply actions
no
not as a general philosophy at least.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
So long ago, I barely remember that game now.
If Bochy coached the Warriors Bengie Molina would start every game at PG.
by cybermaldonado on Nov 22, 2009 1:44 PM PST up reply actions
Yes, we lost runnning it against the Titans
Lets not make this argument complicated for some. They seem to think it’s that’s simple.
I blame this one...
…on BOTH coordinators. Raye’s game plan was again the opposite of what it should be, opening with more runs than passes to open the game. This again forced us to pass more late in the game, which is exactly what we do NOT want to be doing. For the first time, I also felt some frustration with Manusky, too. It seemed fairly obvious Green Bay was passing every third down, yet we couldn’t seem to stop them.
More runs than passes
Gore had 7 runs and 4 or 5 on the first drive which got us the field goal, hence your comment not counting
DELETED
"Optimist Prime"
I'll say it over and over Crabtree was not the pick we NEEDED, at least until he scores with 100yds receiving.
Only 1 rush on that first drive counted
The others went nowhere. Or do you consider the run to the fullback on 4 and 1 a good call? Deleted
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Nov 22, 2009 1:58 PM PST up reply actions
I am talking Gore's runs
LOL
"Optimist Prime"
I'll say it over and over Crabtree was not the pick we NEEDED, at least until he scores with 100yds receiving.
Actually, I take that back...
…looking at the play-by-play, we passed more than we ran after that first drive. So, perhaps the problem wasn’t the lack of passing, but rather the failure to pass downfield, as FL Danny suggested in one of the game threads. Regardless, my diagnosis was wrong…apologies.
Exactly!
Passing to a bunch of short routes does no good when most of the D is playing up near the line. You have to at least threaten downfield every once and a while to keep the DBs and LBs honest. That opens up the short passes and the running game. Also, throw deep in NON-OBVIOUS passing situations (not only 3rd and long, Raye), otherwise they overload blitz.
The problem was we didn't have time to throw deep in the first half ...
Throwing deeper requires better protection, and the Pack were getting an extremely effective pass rush with four guys in the first half.
It wasn’t a case of overload blitzes. It was their four guys beating our five guys.
They ran a lot of blitzes in the first half
They stopped running so many blitzes when Harris got hurt.
Well
apparently they did not pay attention to how Green Bay adjusted to giving up so many sacks this year….they started implementing more short/quick passes so the line didn’t have to block too long…and what did the niners do? Stay 8-10 yards off the receivers most of the time and let them just dink and dunk all game
by sanfranfanmdk on Nov 22, 2009 5:53 PM PST up reply actions
The O-Line
is truly garbage. Both first round draft picks need to be spent on the OL, I don’t care if we need a play-maker in the secondary or an edge rusher. We need OL first, and both 1st round picks (which seem more and more likely to be back-to-back) need to address OT and OG.
I’m sick of this crap excuse of an offensive line.
Michael Crabtree made a couple incredible grabs, and VD made a few tough catches after good hits. Josh Morgan had a 76-yard kick return! All of these late game plays were spoiled because the defense was exhausted at the end of the game. Why were they so tired? Look at the T.O.P. from the first half, and you’ll find your answer. It’s hard to blame a defense for breaking, when the team’s offense kept it off the field for 18:21 through out the entire game.
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 22, 2009 1:54 PM PST reply actions
noooooooooooooo
weak OL draft class, strong OL FA class. Pick up a RT in FA, draft a G in the 2nd. Get a S and an edge rusher in the 1st.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
an uncapped year
makes a bunch of the good FA OTs likely franchised or RFA for their teams. The OL class is hardly weak, there is plenty of first round OT talent. By the looks of it, we’ll be able to land one fo the top 3.
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 22, 2009 1:58 PM PST up reply actions
and yet still
if Berry is there I think we HAVE to take him. “Niners FS” has to be one of the worst FS in football, if not THE worst.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
by niner FS you mean Goldson?
I like the kid a lot. But I don’t see him coming over and making plays on deep balls much. I think the kid should slowly start moving to Strong. He’s a hellish hitter with a nose for the ball, especially after the catch or on running plays. Lewis isn’t getting any younger.
My question still is…can Berry cover as a FS at the NFL level?
Goldson/Roman
Goldson can’t cover, Roman has no nose for the ball.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
I think so
he’s easily the best S of the class.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
Summary: Eric Berry is an elite talent and a top-10 pick. It is as simple as that, barring injury next season. Berry is one of those few individuals where it just seems like this is what he was born to do. He is a natural on the football field with the intangibles to boot. He will also be coached by one of the best defensive coordinators of all time in Monte Kiffin who knows how to coach the strong safety position (John Lynch and Jermaine Phillips).
What really impresses me about Berry is he reportedly played all of the 2008 season with a nagging shoulder injury, which he then had surgery on in December. Berry is the No. 1 prospect in the 2010 NFL Draft, in my opinion.
Player Comparison: Ed Reed. Both players are 5-11 with a surreal knack for the game of football and have the ball skills, range, and playmaking ability you look for.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
So not only does the safety have a nose for the football, but he also knows what to do with it when it is put in his hands. While he is extremely effective in pass coverage, Berry is a major asset to the Volunteer run defense as well, and he is no stranger to highlight reels thanks to frequent heavy hitting.
emphasis mine
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
Berry
Ok, I’d be cool with that happening. One pick has to be dedicated to an OL in round one. Then another 3 through out the remainder of the draft can also be spent on OL because we need as much help as we can get.
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 22, 2009 2:02 PM PST up reply actions
Thank you to a degree :-)
I agree that it is a Good FA Class as you noted. And I think that should be taken into account. And it is good because there are not these guys that are or were good that are at the end of their careers, there are good OL in the FA Market that are not OLD, beaten, worn down, injury prone. There needs to be some work done in the FA to get an OT (RT let’s remember) and a OG. If we can do that then great. It needs to be a reasoned assessment. Our D is good (I think possibly wrongly) but today they were just beat with probably feelings of “Can I just get a drink of gatorade at least till I have to go back out again?”. Split the firsts with an O and a D would be my feeling. But good points overall the draft class is deep in possible players but no suretties on OL. In one way that could be said of the whole draft class, deep but not a surety.
by ChesapeakeBay9er on Nov 22, 2009 2:16 PM PST up reply actions
Well, sort of
like Marvel Smith quality without the injury history.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
ok I feel better
and yes, the defense needs to practice tackling. Also, can we please change that quote on the page saying “we’ll see them again in the playoffs”?
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 22, 2009 1:56 PM PST up reply actions
“Am I emotional? You’re damn right I’m emotional! And I apologize!”?
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
yep
he made some very nice catches. a great second half for the rookie.
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 22, 2009 1:59 PM PST up reply actions
I’d rather address the o line in free agency
49ers Al Grito De Guerra!!! hahaha
by 49erSalvatrucha on Nov 22, 2009 4:11 PM PST up reply actions
Who's likely to be available ...
especially with the tighter FA rules we can expect because it’ll be an “uncapped year?”
You pay a LOT for tackles in free agency, and the guys who are available are usually damaged or over the hill (Jennings, Marvel).
Does anyone know how the Offensive linemen drafted in last year’s first round are doing? I know Michael Oher is playing really really well, but I haven’t heard anything about the others.
Wall-E for Best Picture 2008
2009: The return of Los Galacticos!
by Useful_Idiot on Nov 22, 2009 10:54 PM PST up reply actions
We'll see Eugene Monroe this Sunday right?
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 23, 2009 11:45 AM PST up reply actions
Oh yeah, that’s true
Wall-E for Best Picture 2008
2009: The return of Los Galacticos!
by Useful_Idiot on Nov 23, 2009 12:56 PM PST up reply actions
does raye go?
i understand that there has been a new o.c. every year forever but i truly think that raye has got to go. game plan sucks thus getting us in a hole too early. smith thrives in the spread with the weapons he has. the line is garbage.
I say....
Get rid of Raye NOW. Let Mike Johnson take over play calling duties for the rest of the season and beyond.
It’s obvious to me that Raye has no balls and is constantly afraid to throw the ball down field. His game plan is entirely too timid and clearly ineffective. Why not let Johnson take over play calling for the rest of the year? It’s not like we can get any worse. With the playoff’s basically out of the picture now, we might as well swing for the fences.
by Smithisstilltheanswer on Nov 22, 2009 2:14 PM PST up reply actions
It's not entirely a bad idea.
But I think it would be best for both sides for Raye to “retire” and for Johnson to replace him after the season.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 22, 2009 2:41 PM PST up reply actions
we don't have the patience for that
and i don’t think we owe him the favor of giving up the rest of the season due to his playcalling
(site decorum) THAT!
He needs to go now. That way there can been at least a shred of continuity going into next year. Same system, just better play calling.
by Smithisstilltheanswer on Nov 22, 2009 4:25 PM PST up reply actions
I wouldn't normally be a proponent of that...
but we’re sitting in Cleveland Brown territory on offense. Even with a bad O-line (and can they really be any worse than GB’s), we’re just embarrassing. Smith isn’t setting the world on fire, but he’s putting up okay numbers (over 60%, 80-something rating, 9td/7int) and the talent around him Gore/Davis/Crabtree is at least average or better than.
We’re facing a top 10 offense next week in Jacksonville and Garrards numbers are the same (61%, 81 rating 7td/5int) as Smiths and Mojo/Lewis/Sims-Walker are not really an upgrade on what we have. Why are they top 10 and we’re bottom 6 in the league? Are you telling me that’s all on Barry Sims or Chilo? I’m thinking there might be more to it…
We can't do that
It would cause too much controversy.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 22, 2009 8:11 PM PST up reply actions
Trust me, things can get a lot worse.
We scored more than the league-average number of points this week, against a top defense.
Mind-boggling, given how bad we were for how long, but true.
In any event, I suspect the playcalling you hate is a function of the system. The team is trying to play smash-mouth, ball-control football, despite being really poorly built for that game. But until Sing realizes he needs to change what he asks of his O.C., it doesn’t matter who calls the plays.
I don't know about that
Who made the decision to open it up after the first half?
I’m pretty sure SIngletary wasn’t demanding a conservative offense.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 23, 2009 11:46 AM PST up reply actions
answer me this
what happened to the offense in the 4th quarter? Were there better plays being called or was Alex actually executing some of the same plays from earlier?
Can we extrapolate anything tangible to use going forward or is it just that this team needs a fire lit under it’s arse in order to move the damn ball on offense?
same thing that happened in HOU
and on all the 2 min drives we’ve seen from Smith. He’s been put in a position where he’s more comfortable, able to see the field better, and make some plays.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
I think so.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
we ran some gun early on in this game though
and didn’t see a completion the whole first quarter.
the more and more I see I just think Alex is too afraid to LOSE the game than to play like he has to WIN the damn game.
no we didn't
we ran like 2 plays out of the gun on 3rd and long. That’s not the same as adopting the shotgun spread.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
I remember one play in the first half
2nd and 19 and Alex was under center.
He was immediately pressured and threw an incompletion.
3rd and 19 followed.
This should show us how much of an idiot Raye is.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 22, 2009 2:42 PM PST up reply actions
the reason is because he doesn't have time to think. even when given time in the backfield you can see the the unsure looks on his face
by srill waiting on Nov 22, 2009 2:03 PM PST up reply actions
yeah but
did the protection really improve all of a sudden in the 4th quarter? or did Alex realize he had to get rid of the ball and just executed better?
The protection was a little bit better
But Alex was in the shotgun and was getting the ball out quicker.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 22, 2009 2:43 PM PST up reply actions
that's only because he
was that much further away from the d line to start
by srill waiting on Nov 22, 2009 2:44 PM PST up reply actions
ball out quicker
biggest thing he needs to do. biggest complaint of mine about A.S.
Whatever it takes to make that happen…please Lord 9ers do it!
They were throwing vertical downfield attacking the safeties. Look at the tapes, every time they have tried that they picked up big gains and scored. Watch the previous 3 games, they hardly tried it. 2nd half of the Houston game was again vertical passes down the middle.
that's what I thought
not just going to the gun spread. play calling/routes called.
We need to play like we want to win the game, not like we’re afraid to lose.
At this point…we have to put points up early because we’ve proven we can’t protect a game or close one.
Another thing
Like in Houston, when going 3 and out the opponents defense is rested and playing “down hill” on every play. Get a few first downs and they naturally back off a bit and the pass rush gets winded from being out there for more than three plays. It doesn’t matter if this comes from successfully passing or running. In the first half we had one first down. That was largely due to the O-line pass blocking but also Raye going away from the run game, as Dallas did at GB the previous week. He went away from what was working.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
Anyone else think....
We would have been better sticking with Martz as OC? I think Alex could have done a better job than JTO, and that way our offense could actually score points when the team isn’t down by 20
by sanfranfanmdk on Nov 22, 2009 6:02 PM PST up reply actions
The other extreme?
No thanks.
I’d like something in the middle.
I liked how with Martz we could move the offense in between the 20s at will but in the redzone we failed (remember that?).
I also like how Raye utilizes Vernon Davis.
I’d like somewhat of a combination of an aggressive playcaller that knows how to use his players.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 22, 2009 8:13 PM PST up reply actions
q.b. of the future?
who’s available in free agency next year? or better yet when does davis go in???
Alex Smith isn't so bad.
His only INT was a terrible play.
Either Vernon Davis pulled a Brandon Lloyd or Delanie Walker ran a terrible route.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 22, 2009 2:44 PM PST up reply actions
agreed BUT
he will not bring us a championship. he is so unsure of himself right now. it’s like he doesn’t want to throw it thinking it’ll be a pick. it’s when he doesn’t think that good things happen it seems like. idk i’m just so pissed right now
by srill waiting on Nov 22, 2009 2:57 PM PST up reply actions
I didn't watch the whole game, but ...
In the first half, Alex did have time to find the open receivers. He would drop back, set his feet, look up … and have to move. Often everybody was covered. One time, Morgan was open deep by ALex didn’t have time to look. When they tried to roll him out to buy time (a good idea, showing Raye was aware of the problem) it wasn’t working because the receivers weren’t open.
When I came back to the game in the fourth quarter, Alex looked much more comfortable and confident. He had time to make his read, and, for example, on the touchdown to Gore, he very smoothly made the correct throw.
So honestly, I don’t think the “he looked unsure of himself” argument carries any water. I would have liked to see Raye go to three-step drops and shotguns earlier, however
point is, he needs to take what the defense/offensive line gives him
if that’s only a 1-step drop…i want him getting the ball out to the right guy. That’s your job. Throw the ball to the right spot, throw it away, or take a sack. in that order.
1 step drop?
No QB in the NFL can be successful if his line just gives him 0.5 seconds to throw.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 22, 2009 4:10 PM PST up reply actions
the 1-step drop is common
on quick slants and such. utilize and capitalize on this a few times and blitzes subside a little once you’ve beaten them with this.
one step drops
are used on quick timing routes like slants and are called by the OC. Alex can’t just choose what drop he’s going to do mid-play. It’s the onus of OC to call the right drops based on the kind of pressure occuring.
Mischievously implosive purple pitching staff.
by SloIsLonelyForTheOrange on Nov 22, 2009 5:43 PM PST up reply actions
this
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 22, 2009 8:14 PM PST up reply actions
Nobody ever calls plays designed for a one-step drop.
That’s just nonsense. The quarterback would have to be throwing almost completely laterally, which would be very easy for CB’s to step up and break up.
But yes, I saw a lot of five-step drops today in the first half where the o-line wasn’t getting him time to get there, and Raye needed to recognize that and start making other calls sooner.
I suspect – although I’d have to look at the tape to be sure – that the Packers were shading their coverage in to take away short routes, given how much pressure they were getting with four-man rushes. That’s what I would have done if I was their D.C.
Their blitzes off the edge were also VERY effective
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 22, 2009 8:15 PM PST up reply actions
Somebody please explain the challenge with 2min left
I mean sure the defense gave up the game anyway, but what was the point in challenging the spot? That TO lost effectively ended the game.
Please don’t get me started about the absolutely idiotic way that nearly 4 minutes of game time can be burned off the clock at the end of the game by basically running 3 plays. Still hate that about football.
They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick
couple of things
you’re gonna have to call a TO there anyways, so you might as well challenge. Also, a 3rd and 1 is completely different than 3rd and an inch.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
this
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 22, 2009 2:44 PM PST up reply actions
Yep
And even better, had Sing won the challenge the clock stays stopped and he keeps the extra TO. Plus, as replay showed the spot was worth challenging. But asking refs to overturn their own mistakes seems to not work.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
It was one final....
sticking it to the Niners by the officials…NOT changing something that was obviously incorrect, i mean ray charles could have seen that the ball should have been spotted at least a yard back, and maybe with that spot the niners actually stop them….i was just angered by the lack of holding being called, and when Sing complains, you know something is wrong
by sanfranfanmdk on Nov 22, 2009 6:07 PM PST up reply actions
Hmmm
I wonder if our Kory Sheets guy will show up this week.
by David Fucillo on Nov 22, 2009 2:06 PM PST up reply actions
Carmazzi was our future
"Optimist Prime"
I'll say it over and over Crabtree was not the pick we NEEDED, at least until he scores with 100yds receiving.
TERRAIL LAMBERT WAS OUR FUTURE
This is fun.
(although I completely disagree with my comment).
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 22, 2009 2:45 PM PST up reply actions
Wasn't our future but we should have kept him
"Optimist Prime"
I'll say it over and over Crabtree was not the pick we NEEDED, at least until he scores with 100yds receiving.
MARVIN BERNARD
Sorry, had to throw that one out there…
by Brendan Scolari on Nov 22, 2009 11:52 PM PST up reply actions
Nice one
When can we add THOMAS CLAYTON to this list?
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 23, 2009 11:47 AM PST up reply actions
I'm liking the deep ball to Crabtree
and the redzone throws in the middle to VDiddy is working. I think we’ll get back on track next week
VDiddy?
lol
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 22, 2009 2:45 PM PST up reply actions
Defense has forgotten to hustle
I’ve watched them get away with this the last few games but they no longer swarm to the ball. Seems like the other 10 guys just expect Willis to make the tackle every time. It’s a big problem on the screen passes too. The defense line doesn’t even try to get into the play.
This I don't get
I understand the tackling being sloppy late 2nd Q after they’d be on the field for nearly the entire half. But they opened sloppy and stayed that way. After ten days off. Yes, Clements and Takeo were missed but that doesn’t explain it all.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
That's not how they've played all year
Or even end of last season. So all of a sudden they’ve dropped off. My big question is why?
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
Someone should ask Singletary that same question.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 22, 2009 4:11 PM PST up reply actions
Agreed
Instead of the usual media questions about the playoffs, his cross or how much he believes in the team. You know, real questions.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
He's always wearing that cross
Does that make him a cross-dresser?
We'll see them again in the playoffs! What channel is it on?
Maoicco and Barrows ask good questions
Barrows usually gets blasted though.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 23, 2009 11:47 AM PST up reply actions
can someone
break down the entire play of the INT? I didn’t see it replayed and don’t have the game DVR’d.
INT
I rewound it shortly afterwards and it looked to me like the pass was intended for Delanie Walker (who was behind and diagonal to Vernon Davis). Davis seemed to duck his head, although the pass was behind him when he ducked. However, I still think it was intended for Walker and that actually explained the Davis duck.
by David Fucillo on Nov 22, 2009 2:09 PM PST up reply actions
Smith back to pass (duh)
Walker and Davis running go’s down the field, Davis inside, Walker outside. Walker starts about at the numbers and trails off. Smith throws to about where Walker would have been if he’d run straight down the numbers. GB S is there instead. Can’t tell without knowing the play if it was a blown route by Walker or just a terrible throw from Smith.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
when I saw it real time
I thought it was a horrible throw from Smith. Looking at the replay, it really looks like Walker just ran a terrible route.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
again
this team needs to take chances earlier on. play to win early. if we’re going to lose, at least let’s take our shots.
Secondary
is it the players, or the defensive playcalling? We were super porous today. I’m so tired of being known for poor secondary
i'm questioning things that I normally proclaim to know
and I follow this team all day every day (work from home).
this is when you know things are not good.
both.
our safeties are terrible in coverage, whether it’s Goldson, Roman or Lewis. As for the playcalling, it seemed like they were giving GB’s receivers a pretty big cushion in the 1st half.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
Either they were playing too much zone
Or they suck at man coverage.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 22, 2009 2:47 PM PST up reply actions
I don';t get why the corners weren't playing bump and run
Especially with safety help behind them. Rodgers often didn’t have to hold the ball for more than three seconds. At least the bump would have made him go to a second or third option and often his sacks come from holding the ball too long. We made it easy.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
Maybe because they were afraid of the GB WRs
They’re a lot faster than our CBs.
Either way they were leaving guys WIDE open.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 22, 2009 4:13 PM PST up reply actions
But you have to disrupt the timing vs a Bill walsh style offense
Giving them a free release just makes it easy on Rodgers.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
glad I quit watching
had a steady stream of people stopping by to look at a bunch of power tools i’m selling on craigslist so I didn’t get to finish watching the game.
making easy money > watching the 49ers lose
"Pat is still just scratching the surface." - Coach Singletary on LB Patrick Willis
First half: after they went down 6-3, in Raye’s remaining 11 plays he ran 9 passes and 2 runs. Three of those pass plays resulted in sacks. We got manhandled on the O-Line on passing plays but those two run plays went for 4 yards and 6 yards, and our first drive, which went for points, was all runs.
Bottom line is, earlier in the game, we should have handed the ball off to Gore more, which would have helped us get some first downs and control the ball (which ties it in with the defensive performance). This one-dimensional passing attack (as long as it’s not out of the shotgun, as Viliphied noted) really doesn’t work in the 2nd-4th drives of the game.
Lethargy
It has me
and it seemed like
we passed unsuccessfully on 1st down, either incompletion or sack, then by 2nd or 3rd and long, we ran a futile running play.
can’t there be a happy medium between run on 1st and 2nd and pass on 1st and second?
he ran the ball 7 times today
how can you say there was no success when 1/7th of his work load went for 42 yards?
We have one of the best backs in the league. You don’t give a top player 7 play calls, and many quality run games take a couple of drives to develop.
During the offseason
I was very optimistic about the LOLfensive line. I spouted phrases about continuity. Well, these guys have been playing together for a while now. Maybe it’s just time to accept that there isn’t as much talent in the line as some of us thought.
Joe Staley is solid, but that’s about it, nothing exceptional. Heitman, solid again, nothing exceptional. Baas, along with Rachal I always seem to see one of them on their faces when some DLineman is penetrating to stuff the run. Snyder, I’ll give a break to, he’s been moved around a lot.
I’m with a lot of people here that tackle needs to be a key point to address in the offseason, but I’m not sure that anybody’s spot on that line should be safe. I would peg that position as the weakest unit of the 49ers, and needs to be addressed accordingly. Hopefully next season starts with more than one new face on the line.
What is pathetic about the LOLine is every blitz seems to work against them
When Barnett got Gore the backfield, that play should have been a huge a run for Gore. The blitz was coming from the opposite side and the Packers LBs should have run past the play . . . no our offensive line gives up the play in the backfield when every other team turns that into a 20 yard gain on a perfect play call.
Gore
is 28th in carries on the year.
Some guys to note who are ahead of him are:
Cadillac Williams (RBBC, missed some time)
Fred Jackson (not even a starter anymore)
When you have a stud RB like Gore…108 carries through 10 games just isn’t going to cut it. He realistically played considerable time in 7 games. That averages out to 15 per game.
We've been behind a lot
Teams that are ahead run a lot. Teams that are behind pass a lot.
Gore has also not been particularly effective. His big-play ability is still there, but he’s struggled to get through the line this season because our o-line is getting pushed backwards.
Part of the reason we’ve been so lousy on third downs is because failed runs on first and second down are putting us in third-and-long a lot.
more interested in what Carolina does, honestly.
They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick
that's super relevant
since the whole “wildcard might be best bet” idea is probably out the window now.
I've got the Cardinals D starting for me in fantasy
Although I’m probably going to lose that matchup…..
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 22, 2009 2:49 PM PST up reply actions
The real problem
I don’t think the problem is Raye, so much as it’s Singletary’s strategic decision to play smash-mouth football.
The NFL game is opening up. Lots of teams run misdirections on short-yardage plays now, rather than just try to ram it home, because defenses have gotten too big and strong. That’s what we saw on the first possession third-and-inches: the defense got the push, and it was all over.
But Singletary seems to want to coach the team he played for: a great back running the ball, and QB throwing enough to keep defenses honest, and a brutal defense. But that doesn’t win in today’s NFL, where the best teams are the Patriots, Colts, Saints – teams which throw early and often. This is why we ended up with Raye rather than Linehan. Is Raye being the good soldier he promised to be, and running what Sing wants, until the game situation gets so bleak that the team has no other choice?
Our team’s main offensive strength is the receiving corps: Crabtree, Morgan, and Davis are all very good payers. Hill may prove to be a very good player. Gore has always been an effective pass-catching back, and he’s excellent at picking up the blitz. I think it’s telling that when the team has to switch to emphasizing those players, they start moving the ball. So why are we trying to be a power-run team?
I’d blame Raye for this if I thought it was his idea, but I don’t. This is the offense Singletary told us he wanted to run when he was hired. This is the offense he hired Raye to run. And maybe it could work if we had a great power offensive line.
But we don’t. Singletary needs to start coaching the team he has, rather than the team he wished he had.
I actually wish we had opened with trying to run the ball down GBs throat
Gore looked great. Running lanes were there. And the GB secondary had the upper hand on our young WRs. Except we stopped running the ball. Same as Dallas last week after they opened with successful running plays. I don’t get it.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
Did he really, or was it just that one run?
Gore’s first runs:
1: 42 yd up the middle
2: One yard behind the LG (direct snap)
3: Gore up the middle for 3
4: Gore up the middle for 4
5: Six yards (but on second-and-long) from the shotgun
I see one successful play out of our first five tries. Maybe two out of five, depending on how you count that first play.
I don’t see how we were imposing our will with the running game there at all.
So we don't run Gore and we lose
Which is clearly what ALWAYS happens when we don’t run him
"Optimist Prime"
I'll say it over and over Crabtree was not the pick we NEEDED, at least until he scores with 100yds receiving.
Well, you might have the causality backwards.
When you’re behind double digits, you can’t run the ball very much, the clock is too important.
Usually, the best teams in the league run the most, and it’s because they’re ahead a lot.
Stick with it
We knew coming in that the strength of the GB team was their secondary. Last week Dallas ran well from the 2WR and 2TE formations. We should have stuck with the same. I don’t meant to insinuate that we’d have scored three TDs, but we would have used more clock, gotten more than one first down and rested our defense some, thus giving up less than 23 points.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
Dallas didn't score until their final drive ...
… I’m not sure how much we should take any cues from them.
They opened by running which was successful
Then went all pass and stopped moving the ball or even getting first downs. Much like our 2nd half. We should have learned to stick with a 2WR-2TE formation and run the ball.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
what?
we didn’t start moving the ball till the 2nd half, when we completely abandoned the run. 2+2 = 5?
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
right
I was kind of with him there, then he said this:
Then went all pass and stopped moving the ball or even getting first downs. Much like our 2nd half.
Which confused me, because the 2nd half is when we were moving the ball most effectively.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
FYI...
for all the run vs pass discussion….
we’re undefeated when we run more than pass.
we’ve lost every game that alex smith throws 25+ times.
Gore has a lot of runs of 40+ (don’t want to look up the stat right now….fill it in if you care)
Frank Gore is better than Alex Smith (nobody can argue this)
what can you draw from this?
Frank Gore is our best player, he’s a threat to score from anywhere on the field, and he’s underutilized.
Alex Smith has never been a good NFL qb, and he’s not progressing regardless of his 3 or 4 good quarters this year.
It doesn’t matter if we fall behind- you have to have a 4qarter strategy, and you run the ball through your strengths.
MARK MY WORDS:
If we throw the ball 25+ times in a game, we will lose.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again:
Winning teams DO tend to run more than they pass, but that’s because they tend to be in the lead. You run when you’re ahead.
Almost all of the good teams in the league over the past several years have passed the ball early, and run late.
This is a point lost on many
The Atlanta game is the only one we’ve lost by more than one score. The Atlanta, Houston and GB games are the only were we didn’t lead in the 4th.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
Missing the point
As often happens with you. I’ll walk you through it: when leading, tied or trailing by less than one score in the 4th quarter, a team can run or pass, per their choosing, since the game is in doubt. They are not one dimensional. So other than the Atlanta game and perhaps the Houston game, the Niners have had both options open to their play calling. This had nothing to do with “almost wins”. At least follow the thread before you spew the toxic drivel.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
"The Atlanta game is the only one we’ve lost by more than one score"...
That’s what I’m responding to. So, like against IND, the 49ers failed to do anything offensively and all IND had to do was sit on a 4 point lead. Which they didn’t get until the 4th quarter. Other games like TEN, the 49ers were outscored by 14 in the 4th before a final TD that was again a TD too late, like the TD’s in HOU, and in GB.
So really, the 49ers weren’t in those games, losing by just under one score. They have been outscored in chunks, and forced to catch up, and that means going one dimensional in the passing game.
I mean, it’s all right there Bubba. Once again, you reach, and I slap it away from you again.
Well, we're waiting....
Wow, you really are off
Must I keep correcting you? Easy work, yes. But knocking you down actually can bring pleasure. Eliminating foolishness from the world. See, I’ll tell you a little secret: in Indy, the Niners led for over 41 minutes and had the ball twice in the 4th quarter when trailing by 4 points. Thus, yeah, in it. The Houston game, yes, 21 down at the half and ten down late created a problem. And yet there they were with the ball and one timeout, down by three with just under 2-minutes remaining, driving for the tie or win. Against Tennessee they not only led at the half but in the 4th. They even had the ball down by 4 then down by 7 in the 4th. So yeah, in it.
So yeah, I’d say they were in those games. Actually, the Indy and Tennessee games, more than in it. Now, do you like being wrong just to see if people will call you on it, thus receiving some masochistic pleasure, or do you really just not knowing what you’re talking about half the time?
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
Again...
The 49ers weren’t able to even get in FG range in the second half in IND. That’s not being in it. TEN put up 14 points in the 4th, 7 do due a TO. That’s not being in it.
I’m just calling you out on your delusions here. Your " empty platitudes" really show here. You just get pissed because I call them out, and you have nothing to counter it.
Well, we're waiting....
Pissed at you?
Naw. Not worth it. Delusional people should be corrected and perhaps prayed for. I’ve already corrected you… again. But since you are the king of projection, I see that I piss you off by calling out your incorrect analysis. To say nothing of your bitter posts. So at least I’m effective. The snake rises again and gets his ugly head chopped off. Thanks for playing. Not sure why I bother. I give you four days tops before you again obsess over one of my posts and share some negative off topic opinion. Good day, little drummer. How long can you go without?…
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
That's an interesting comment, but it begs a few questions ...
Like if we’ve had that many fourth quarter leads, why is everybody upset with our offense? Our defense isn’t holding leads. :/
This 49er team has proven it can be ineffective both running the ball and passing it. I love Gore’s big runs, but I really don’t think they compensate for all the short ones. Our inability to get good yards consistently on first and second down – including via the run – has really not put our passing game in a position to succeed.
I don’t think Raye is a great O.C., but I think the systemic problems with the o-line and the philosophy are bigger problems. Until we get them straightened out, it’ll be easy to pick on the playcalling because we won’t have a lot of success.
I'm calling Raye's offense...
“The Schizo Offense”. It can look good at times, then turn ugly on you in a second.
The ugly part is pure horror.
Well, we're waiting....
In the meantime....
Maybe Raye should look at the fact that the only time this offense has momentum is when he puts Smith in an offensive set he feels comfortable in…
That would probably be asking too much.
Anytime we have to come from behind, we are running completely different plays than what we initially start off with. Doesn’t take a genius to figure out that maybe you should start the game off like that. Hell, if you have to run a hurry up offense the entire game, then do it! Jimmy Raye is the worst OC I have seen in a lot of years.
I don’t think Raye is a great O.C.,
Is an understatement.
Defense has let us down
I address this in the play-by-play, but the defense plays three good quarters of football and then rolls over in the 4th.
We needed a stop with 5:50 left in the 4th to give Alex Smith and the offense another chance and the defense couldn’t get it done.
we were on the field all day
T.O.P. – 18m SF. 42m GB
we have one of the best D’s in the league.
Not against Green Bay we didn't
The defense was horrid. Sloppy tackling, poor pass coverage, ineffective against the run.
I'll repeat
we were on the field for 42 minutes out of a 60 minute game. Few defenses can hang with that kind of ratio.
Our offense was killing our defense.
Goes both ways
The big time discrepancies happened in the 1st half. 2nd half time of possession was much closer.
very general...
your statement. I don’t think this is true.
you run to wear down the defense early and you throw late to exploit tired legs.
That's just not true.
It was the conventional wisdom 20 years ago. But if you watch a lot of football these days you’ll see that most successful teams follow the opposite model: you pass early (which is more effective: most teams average over six yards per pass attempt, adjusted, and under five per rush attempt) and build a lead, and then you run to grind out the clock once you’re ahead.
Of course it doesn’t always work out that simply.
But...
On the road, with this schizo offense, I would think that you put it on running the ball and defense. McCarthy actually got dangerously conservative in the second half. But he had enough points (thanks to a Smith INT) to sit on.
Well, we're waiting....
until I see it work in SF...
I’m not going to see it any other way.
Our DEF was on the field way too much yesterday, and this pass-happy offense is he BS that’s keeping them out there.
Instead of taking the mentality that we should just throw to get positive yards (sacks notwithstanding…you don’t seem to be mentioning those), why don’t we work on more inventive play calling to get gore out of the backfield, screens/wildcat plays/reverses…hell, even Morgan’s run went for 8 yards yesterday.
We need to run the football.
My mistake
I mean like our first half. As in, after the first series (which got points) we went away from the run and got zero first downs.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
keep up the good word...
I feel like there’s a division in Niner land. many who think we should turn to the air, and those who think we can still run the ball. I am going to beat this dead horse until someone gives me a credible explanation as to why throwing the football is the best option for our team. Go Gore! Go Niners!
1st Half:
(P=pass / R=run TOP=time of possession)
P, R, R, R, R…3 points / 2:32 TOP
R, P, P…0 points / 1:01 TOP
P,R,P…0 points / 1:34
P,P,P…0 points / 1:30
P,R,P…0 points / .43
Just think…if we could have gotten a first down or 2 early in the game, we could have kept the GB offense off the field.
Our 21 points came in garbage time- we had one short field, thanks to a great return by Morgan. Kampman and Harris were both out of the game, and GB was able to stay on the field because our defense was dog tired. We should be the team that has the 5:50 drives to end the game. Those 21 points mean nothing, because we needed 28.
Norris
has no business getting a handoff. Unless it’s like 1st and goal from the 1-inch mark and we’re trying to surprise the defense…even then…not sure…
play-call
A lot of teams make that kind of call. When you only need an inch, it makes sense to go with the guy a full yard closer to the line of scrimmage. Gore had plenty of times when he’s been stuffed, and Norris has converted that situation before.
by David Fucillo on Nov 22, 2009 2:26 PM PST up reply actions
just run off tackle
We aren’t “a lot of teams”. Our o-line sucks. We can’t outphysical the other team when they know it’s coming.
Honestly, if you can't trust Frank effing Gore to get a yard...
They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick
The problem was Norris
It was the offensive line. I’m not sure which lineman it was – it may have been Rachal, but it may have been the extra linemen put in (I thought I saw Rachal successfully push him man several yards).
But whomever that lineman was, he got pushed back, and the defensive lineman got under him, which caused the stop.
You can’t blame that on the RB at all.
You can blame the call, however. If you only need an inch, do a QB sneak. Or do a misdirection. Running-up-the-middle when the other team is expecting it doesn’t seem to be working for anyone these days. Teams are having more success with short runs by spreading the field to create space, or running misdirections.
But if the guard you’re trying to run behind gets pushed into the backfield, the play call almost doesn’t matter.
They had the misdirection covered
Gore was going the opposite way and Clay Matthews shot in there like a bat out of hell because I was thinking that play was coming. Glad it didn’t. And I am not sure if I agree or disagree, QB sneak? or FB dive? It’s a toss-up. 50/50. But I will say this about Norris, he is an average blocker (used to be better) and not a runner type of guy like Tom Rathman, William Floyd, or Mike Alstott was. So really, what are you supposed to do other than what we have been in those short yardage situations?
By the way...
Do you know if the Packers’ Clay Matthews is related to the LB of the same name who played for the Browns in the 80s?
We'll see them again in the playoffs! What channel is it on?
Yeah
(Cleveland Browns) #57…. His uncle played too Bruce Matthews and their Dad before them Clay Mathews Sr. He is actually Clay Matthews # 3 to play on GB
Its late....how that was supposed to come off is...
Clay Matthews Sr.> and I can’t remember who he played for.
Bruce Matthews (Hou) and Clay Matthews Jr. (Clev)>>
Clay Matthews III (GB)
57 was quite a player!
on that defense (coached by Marty Shottenheimer). Bruce was a tight end, right?
We'll see them again in the playoffs! What channel is it on?
Ok, did my own research
Wikipedia says Bruce played all OL positions (so no surprise you couldn’t remember which). He blocked for Earl Campbell and was chosen for 14 (!) pro bowls. Currently, he’s on the Texans’ staff.
As for Clay Sr.,
He was drafted in the 25th round of the 1949 NFL Draft by the Los Angeles Rams but never played for them. He played in the National Football League for four seasons with the San Francisco 49ers.
We'll see them again in the playoffs! What channel is it on?
Running up the middle when when the other team is expecting it works perfectly for SF opponents.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 22, 2009 4:15 PM PST up reply actions
No, sometimes SF opponents do that thing where they run to somewhere other than up the middle.
I forget what it’s called because it’s been so long.
GROUGTHINK ALERT
The first Chester Arthur fanboy ever.
Why do we suck so bad in 3rd and short situations (on defense)?
They can’t stop the other team even when they know what the other team is going to do.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 22, 2009 8:18 PM PST up reply actions
He's talking about on defense
And i have no idea why a defense typically so good at stopping the run would be so bad in power situations. We’re 28th (IIRC) according to FO’s numbers.
by Brendan Scolari on Nov 23, 2009 12:00 AM PST up reply actions
It really baffles me
They can stuff Chris Johnson for a loss on 1st or 2nd down but when it’s 3rd and short we can just expect the other team to plow through them and pick up the first down.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 23, 2009 11:52 AM PST up reply actions
I feel stupid always typing "+1" to your posts
But again, completely agreed. :-)
by Brendan Scolari on Nov 22, 2009 11:59 PM PST up reply actions
Bottom line:
If I can guess what plays are coming (FB Dive) what the (site decorum) do you think is happening on the other side of the field? I think that horrible play worked what, two times this year? Yet over the past three weeks we’ve seen it about five times? That’s ridiculous.
by Smithisstilltheanswer on Nov 22, 2009 4:36 PM PST up reply actions
Chargers just ran that play vs Denver
And it worked as the FB ran for 15 yards. The difference? SD O-line got tremendous push in the middle. Sometimes it really is about the players not coaches.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
Right
But I bet SD didn’t run it in the same exact situation three weeks in a row. This is the problem with Raye, if he calls a play that works ONE TIME.. he begins to overuse it. We saw it with the Gore runs vs Seattle. How many times did you find yourself cursing Jimmy Raye when Josh Morgan motioned over the OT? That’s about seven for me.
by Smithisstilltheanswer on Nov 22, 2009 4:40 PM PST up reply actions
Actually they ran it about three times in the 2nd half
Two first downs and a TD. I say this as someone who wanted our carry to go to Gore, even before the call was made. Not PA deep. No end-around. No Norris carry. But acting as though it was God awful is ignoring that it didn’t work due to the O-line.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
Jimmy
Yeah I think its time for Jimmy to take a seat and leave the organization. That man is the most predictable play caller i ever seen and hard headed to not change things up until he is forced because they are losing by 3 TDs. The defensed sucked because Jimmy is the king of 3 and out he doesn’t let the defense rest. And how many times does he have to see that ALEX don’t play well under center put HIM in the SHOTGUN!!!! OMG this dude sucks really bad!
The motion play with Morgan and then run was not used once today so kudos for Raye
"Optimist Prime"
I'll say it over and over Crabtree was not the pick we NEEDED, at least until he scores with 100yds receiving.
seriously
You realize he’s a good blocking receiver and that particularly motion by him was involved in two different huge Gore TD runs right? I’m not saying it’s the greatest play in the world, but people are acting like the team runs for 1 yard every time the play is run.
by David Fucillo on Nov 22, 2009 4:16 PM PST up reply actions
i know fooch is starting a thread but...
what record do we have to get to before we say let’s see what we have in Nate Davis before it’s draft time / FA time?
If we lose the next three games
Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son
by lincecuminyourface on Nov 22, 2009 2:38 PM PST up reply actions
He's going to have to start practicing the offense first
I really doubt he’s going to master the entire offense in a few weeks.
Besides, Alex Smith isn’t the problem.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 22, 2009 2:53 PM PST up reply actions
+1
Anyone who thinks Smith is the problem just hasn’t been watching. I don’t care if you put Tom Brady behind our line, when you only have one second to throw, the outcome will not be good.
by Smithisstilltheanswer on Nov 22, 2009 4:42 PM PST up reply actions
Yup our o line is pretty bad. They better fix it
49ers Al Grito De Guerra!!! hahaha
by 49erSalvatrucha on Nov 22, 2009 4:51 PM PST up reply actions
Hasn't the GB line been nearly as bad?
Rodgers still looks awesome. I’m not saying Smith is the problem, but saying Tom Brady would not look good in the Niners offense is crazy talk IMO.
by Brendan Scolari on Nov 23, 2009 12:02 AM PST up reply actions
GB got some of their starters back
and they adjusted the game plan. Rather than try for long passes they went for the short 5-10 yards passes across the middle. This doesn’t require much blocking time and lets Rodgers get the ball away fast.
Also, their covereage was better than ours ...
eg when we rolled smith out to buy time, there was still no-on efor him to throw to.
I don't think you'll see anything form him this year
It’s not a question of record. He only gets in if both Hill and Smith are hurt. He’s not ready.
And honestly, the problem isn’t Smith right now. He may not be the solution, quite frankly, but he’s not the problem, either.
Nate Clements' tacking is missed
I’ve noticed a big fall off in this area since his injury/benching. He was the team’s best tackler in the secondary and seemed to inspire others. The defense doesn’t have the same ferocity anymore.
There were no garbage touchdowns in this game. The Packers never took any starters out. Twenty points isn’t a big enough lead in the NFL for a team to go into garbage. The STDs earned those fair and square.
The reason why we keep seeing these Jekyll and Hyde offensive displays is because the Niners’ “desperation offense” is the type play calling we should be seeing all game. It works, and Alex Smith works well in it. When they line up in the shotgun and take shots downfield, they succeed. When they try to force an offensive scheme that depends heavily on run-blocking by the offensive line, they fail. This is clearly demonstrable, and it seems like Jimmy Raye is the only person left in the world still not convinced of it. It’s the reason for the second half of the Houston game, and it’s the reason Smith all of a sudden becomes so impressive looking during two minute drills. If you don’t believe me, go look at the play-by-plays for almost every single drive that resulted in a 49er touchdown this year and the type of play calling that caused it.
I don’t think they need to direct-snap to Gore when they line up in a shotgun formation. Gore seems to do well on draw plays. God knows he can’t depend on this O-line to open up holes for him- might as well draw some of those defenders out of his face.
just remember
i coined the phrase “desperation offense” in the 4th quarter thread earlier today! ;-)
can you imagine…“offensive coordinator Jimmy Raye runs the Desparation Offense, whereas Bill Walsh ran the West-Coast Offsense”
This
Is why Alex Smith is not our QBOTF. That’s why you draft QB’s in a prostyle O so that you can run and throw from behind center, since it is easier to mix it up
"Optimist Prime"
I'll say it over and over Crabtree was not the pick we NEEDED, at least until he scores with 100yds receiving.
Raye isn't the only person who doesn't see it ...
… quite frankly, I think Singletary is the reason for Raye’s playcalling.
This is the offense Singletary said he wanted to run, and Raye is running it. I like Sing as a head coach, but unless he lets go of some of his ideas on offensive football, it’s hard to see how we could have much success.
If I hear sing say
anythung about how upbeat the “guys” are this week in any press conference i’m gonna be pissed. this team needs to be pissed. play pissed ,live pissed from here on out.
furthermore
I don’t want to hear, “I thought the offense did a pretty good job. I thought Alex did a good job…”
no they didn’t. they sucked for 3 quarters. admit it and do something about it.
and to think I would have never said these things about Sing a month ago…shows how pissed I am
didn't he say that he would
only be happy with “FLAWLESS” execution of the O and D? well i want to hear him get pissed and do something. anything
by srill waiting on Nov 22, 2009 2:51 PM PST up reply actions
It works for the Bengals
They play pissed off and they dominate stronger opponents.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 22, 2009 2:54 PM PST up reply actions
Matt Leinart
A little off topic here but can anyone tell my why he is in at quarterback for the cards? Did Warner get hurt?
Warner is hurt
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 22, 2009 2:54 PM PST up reply actions
God I hate hoping that people get hurt
but God I hope Warner is done for goods.:) please forgive your young goatengus
How much does Warner do for the Cardinals\How bad is Leinart
They cannot do anything without him. Their whole offense reloves around the talent they have. CLUE TO RAYE; utilize the talent you have.
That's actually a fun comparison.
Leinart is much better than Nate Davis. Leinart can’t do anything and he’s got Fitz and Boldin, and let’s face it that is much better than Crabs/VD.
Think about that.
They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick
Leinart
has been horrible since being drafted, how can you say he is at all better then Nate Davis, let alone MUCH better. That literally makes no sense
by Smithisstilltheanswer on Nov 22, 2009 4:46 PM PST up reply actions
What almost was
Niners almost overcome a 20 point deficit in eleven minutes. What a story it could’ve been. They continue to be one or two plays away, which I appreciate makes them better than last season, but am frustrated that it’s still not good enough this season. Very good teams make there own breaks; that’s obviously not us. But even good and average teams get a break or two. We have yet to. In all four road losses we’re the team that makes the one or two big mistakes that make us just good enough to lose. Colts today won their fourth straight that coulda/shoulda been a loss. Dallas won because the Redskins kicker sucked today. Even the awful Lions got a break against the worse Browns.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
Not spotting GB 20 points in the first half
That would have been a nice break.
They call their best player "Kung Fu Panda" and they complain that people aren’t taking them or the game seriously enough? -Nick
4th down conversion
Rams converted a huge 4th down down to the 1, setting up a Jackson TD (huge for me in fantasy). Rams hanging in there!
by David Fucillo on Nov 22, 2009 3:36 PM PST up reply actions
Could be huge
I don’t know the severity, and I definitely don’t like to see guys get hurt, but that could be huge for the NFC West Race
by mountaindew77 on Nov 22, 2009 3:42 PM PST up reply actions
The Rams need to get the ball back.
"I never watched baseball on TV. It's slow and boring. I'm not a fan. Never was." - Jeff Kent
Them's the breaks
rams WR misses a easy TD catch in the lights so instead they kick a FG. Then they miss another TD near the end and run out of downs. I’d like the Niners to get a few breaks like that in the next six games.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
Vernon Davis Post-Game Interview:
Davis said the 49ers’ success came in large part from their shotgun spread formations, and suggested the team should use the spread more often.
“We’ve just got to come out from the beginning and take advantage of the things we can take advantage of,” Davis said. “If it’s spreading the ball, maybe we need to do that. But it’s not up to me, I don’t call the plays.”
Welp, there you go.
Hopefully Sing is listening
Raye’s calling the game plan that Sing wants. Sing wants to be a power team only we don’t have the personnel for that. He’s not adjusting the game plan to the guys we have and is instead trying to fit a square peg in a round hole.
Our fourth-year tight end understands more about offensive strategy than a coordinator who’s been working in the NFL for the last 32 years.
I suspect Raye is doing what Sing is telling him to do.
Since this is exactly what Sing said he wanted to do when he was hired.
What did Sing say exactly?
I’m sure you’ll get it misconstruded as everyone else!!!!!!!
"Optimist Prime"
I'll say it over and over Crabtree was not the pick we NEEDED, at least until he scores with 100yds receiving.
Singletary constantly says:
I don’t want to go 3 and out
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 22, 2009 4:24 PM PST up reply actions
This is what I a asking
I suspect Raye is doing what Sing is telling him to do. Since this is exactly what Sing said he wanted to do when he was hired.
I am asking what he’s talking about!
"Optimist Prime"
I'll say it over and over Crabtree was not the pick we NEEDED, at least until he scores with 100yds receiving.
When Singletary was hired, he talked a lot about smash-mouth football.
He talked about running the ball, then running it some more.
I don’t have the quotes right in front of me, but you were around then, I’m sure you remember. It was a big part of the reason most of us suspected, at the time, that Linehan turned him down for the o.c. job.
He talked a lot of imposing their will on the opponent, and the physical nature of football. He reigned in Martz to cut down on turnovers.
To be clear
The quotes I remember then and that he repeated when Smith became the QB were “I’m not a three yard and a cloud of dust kinda guy” and "I want to be able to run the football when we need to run the football even when the other teams knows we will " or some variation of that. Those quotes were morphed by some media then fans to mean he wants to play Marty-ball. Then Raye made the infamous “run 60% of time time” statement even though that’s statistically near impossible to do in the NFL and people assumed this was going to be the most smash-mouth conservative team in the league, even though that’s not what Sing said he wanted.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
I think that Ray is tactically adequate
but the strategy is wrong. Whomever (Sing, Raye, combination) has the idea that we can come out conservative and rely on the defense has it wrong (sometimes).
FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.
we can rely on the defense....
if we help eat the clock (first downs), if we give the D long fields to defend, and if we can get pressure from our front 7.
smash mouth football is strategically sound.
run offenses wear defenses down.
if an opposing secondary has to step up and play the run- fight off blocks from the O-Line and VD and our strong receivers, they’re in for a tougher match. they’re worn down more in the 3rd and 4th quarters.
Pass plays have rules to protect the defense from taking on contact…so how is it in our best interest to throw more than run – over the course of 4 quarters? I think we’re all seeing the capabilities of our pass catchers evolve over the season, and if we put them in a position to make big plays late in games, we might actually see some wins. it’s how we won early in the season. what’s changed?
I know we have a horrid OL, but if you look at MIA, they’ve seem to have the right idea, work your run in creatively. If we find creative ways to get the ball in the hands of Gore, we’d be more successful, and we get the benefit of befuddling defenses and grinding them down. a day full of trying to stop Gore has to be hard on any defense.
I don't mean that
it’s UNSOUND for all occasions, just that it’s unsound for this team. The Miami OL can actually run block.
I think the other thing that screws us is that “run/blitz” or fronts where the LOS is jammed by the defense (including CBs playing bump and run) work extremely well vs. the Niners formations/personnel – no matter if we run or pass.
Our recievers do not get good separation off the line, and our QB has no time to throw.
FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.
wtf happened to the D
I really thought when the season started that we would have a top 5 D, all kinds of sacks and respect, it seems like we actually provide a platform for teams players to have a spot at the sports center top 10 lately
Well....
when the D is one the field 40+ mins a game, it is hard to succeed…also, when the opposing Offense is holding on half of the plays and nothing is called, it makes the D look bad
by sanfranfanmdk on Nov 22, 2009 7:22 PM PST up reply actions
The Raiders just beat Cincy...
LOL, the 49ers have just one more win than the Duhs.
Well, we're waiting....
I was shocked when I saw the final score
Goes to show that the Bengals only bring it when they’re playing an insurmountable foe.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Nov 22, 2009 4:25 PM PST up reply actions
Cincy let down
Huge win on the road last week, played down the opponent this week. And their franchise has never won in Oakland. Of course the Raiders do this every year. They have to have a couple of home upsets plus their annual win at KC to reach four or five wins.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
They always win two games they have absolutely no business being in.
GROUGTHINK ALERT
The first Chester Arthur fanboy ever.
and those two are already done.
so we can expect them to go “defeated” from here on out. though, a better record than Carolina is preferrable
Pretty much
But if they have one OMG road win stored away, I hope they pull it out this Thursday.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
So right with all of this . . .
Of course the Raiders do this every year. They have to have a couple of home upsets plus their annual win at KC to reach four or five wins.
I’m so pumped that Cincy lost, i can’t stand all their fans anymore after going to school here. It’s pathetic, all i do is ask “where were you guys last year?”
Remind them who beat them in the super bowl lol
49ers Al Grito De Guerra!!! hahaha
by 49erSalvatrucha on Nov 22, 2009 4:49 PM PST up reply actions
I might cry...
but I’m a girl so its ok. The local Raiders show just called out our offensive play-calling, Jeremy Newberry just said “the Niners are playing not to lose, they aren’t playing to win.” Besides the whole ‘those who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones’ bit, it’s just sad when even the Raiders are smart enough to know Raye’s/Sing’s game strategy is all wrong. The Raiders! And they won today. Seriously, tear.
Newberry got that from me
cause I said that in this very thread. Start playing to win, particularly early on in games, rather than playing scared to lose.
well if you said that earlier then I'd vote for you doing our play calling over Raye...
actually I’d vote for just about anyone being the OC over Raye so that isn’t much of a compliment, but you know what I mean. Dude is seriously killing us.
Playing not to lose
Did anyone ask Newberry how that’s possible when Gore had 7 carries for the game? It’s not as though this is the same game plan as when Hill was QB.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
Strategy suggestion for the 49er players, not the coaches:
Let your opponent score three touchdowns as soon as possible in the First Quarter. That should get Jimmy Raye out of his game plan (that never works), and you will have the whole game (rather than just the last quarter) to play real football. You might even win a few games.
just a note
to those saying our offense was “conservative”
Just make sure you understand that doesn’t entail running the ball a ton. Gore only had 7 carries. We called a ton of pass plays. They were just ineffective, largely due to poor protection, short routes called (Raye) and lack of execution by the QB
If anyone opens a Raye or offense thread
I’d really like for everyone to define what they mean when they say “spread” or “conservative” or “be more aggressive” etc. Not to argue but for the sake of clarity.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
offense thread
I actually am planning on putting together a front page post related to the offense, and particularly some issues with the spread offense. Probably gonna post it tomorrow late morning or early afternoon depending on what else gets posted (my Nate Davis-related post going up at 7 or 8am tomorrow). Hopefully nobody creates a FanPost in the meantime.
by David Fucillo on Nov 22, 2009 6:04 PM PST up reply actions
Sounds good
If you can ask people to clarify their platitudes that would be helpful. Saying that Raye should be more aggressive or conservative, or the Niners should start playing to win tends to confuse the debate. Some people just don’t like Raye or Smith and won’t change their feelings, which is fine. Others really have philosophical or strategic issues with the play calling or execution and I’d be interested to read those.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
You've been met
And dismissed. SInce you are not good company. You stayed away for what, three days? And lost the challenge, again. My stalker returns…
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
I think's it's time...
To revisit Danny’s article on Jimmy Raye, then one prior to the season start.
Well, we're waiting....
NIners run defense
was a huge let down. I mean, we know the offense is awful – we expect it. But the D got brutalized on the ground, and didn’t stop the pass either. Only a couple key stops on 3rd-and-short prevented this game from being more like 30-3 at the half.
I do think there’s no point in keeping up the charade of a run-first offense. We’re 4-6, and basically out of the playoffs. May as well go full shotgun no-huddle the rest of the way and see if we can’t score some points. Keep Gore on the field, use him as a outlet/draw play back, or even split him wide if we can get some pass protection from the front 4.
FIRE BRIAN SABEAN... UNLESS HE KEEPS DRAFTING WELL. .. AND SIGNS UNDERRATED PLAYERS LIKE AFFELDT OR PHELPS. .. OR ALRIGHT WHO'S PLAYING WITH THE ALIEN MIND-SWITCHING RAY?
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game currently in early planning stages.
we stink
that is the truth of it and alex smith is a bust for sure are team just isnt that good and we still need players in all phases of the game.
Your post here is a bust
Jimmy Raye is clearly holding Smith back with his play calling throughout the enire first half. That and the WR’s not always being open as well as the Oline playing matador with th opposing Dlines
drew....
really? do you really think Raye needs to unleash Alex Smith? is this in our best interests? has he won yet?
Maybe you turned the TV off before the 2nd half began
I don’t know…. but it appears that way with this response. He hasn’t won because Raye is a coward calling plays with his tail between his legs. You play to your offenses strengths. Obbbbbvvvvvviously, Smith does much better in a spread and sees the field very well. He was nearly flawless when Raye said, “Oh crap….. I forgot that that is what works for us.”
C’mon t p….you have got to be joking
Raye...
doesn’t have a tail.
and I don’t need a TV… I’ve seen Alex Smith play football. it’s not worth watching.
“I don’t need a TV” = I didn’t watch the game? If thats the case, why would you even bother to comment on Smith’s performance. That is just foolish.
by randolphforpresident on Nov 22, 2009 10:20 PM PST up reply actions
correct
I can’t watch the game, as I am not in a SF market. I am commenting on the fact that we need to change the ‘Alex Smith’ mindset, it’s not in our best interests to become a passing offense. It’s not working for us. We were winning ugly early in the year, but at least we were winning. Same thing with last year…when we ditched the pass offense and moved to the ball control shaun hill offense.
Our time of posession yesterday…18 minutes. In a 60 minute game.
Even in the Shaun Hill blowout game this year, we had the ball for 23 minutes.
If you can take anything from what I am saying, take this. Everyone on this board seems to thing that Smith can fling a football, but he needs to be in a spread offense and have 4 or 5 guys running down field. Also, everyone thinks we have a horrible OLine…so… is it in our best interests to take 2 guys out of protection and let Alex Smith throw prayers? What is so unsavory about running our offense through number 21? Alex Smith, where are our victories?
Our time of posession yesterday…18 minutes. In a 60 minute game.
Even in the Shaun Hill blowout game this year, we had the ball for 23 minutes.
seriously???
In Shaun Hill’s 23 minutes we scored a grand total of 10 points.
In Smith’s 18 we scored 24.
Alex Smith, where are our victories
just stop…. wins are not a qb stat
Actually..
i was on the whole bandwagon of smith being a bust, but i have to say he did impress me in the second half. i honestly dont think smith is to blame when our o-line cant even protect him at least half of the time..seriously..if he has time smith suprisingly can be very effective. and that int was miss communication with vernon. actually, most of his ints this year were catchable balls and that has alot to say because his other ints before this year were just terrible. bottom line..give smith time to throw, spread the offense shot-gun or non shot gun..he can be very effective. since he has all the tools beside him..he has to prove it. our o-line is disgusting tho..late
alex smith
even with all of whatever people want to say this guy does not win games and will lose a game for you and just completing less than 50% of the passes is not encouraging to me
He completed 70% + last game there wizzkid…. and his overall was 65% for this season. 3 TD’s and 1 INT? Clearly you are blinded and cannot see that Raye is the idiot in the scenario. Find the right person to blame before you start firing off nonsense to feel better.
are you mad at me?
IN MY OPINION – I just don’t think Alex Smith is any better than Shaun Hill. At least, when we have Hill in, we don’t operate under the misconception that we have a passing offense. There’s more to being a good QB than throwing out of the shotgun, or putting up 250 yards, or throwing TD’s in the 4th quarter- it’s about seeing the field and putting your players in position to win. It’s about managing clock, and confusing the defense.
I assume you will tell me that Alex’s picks aren’t his fault mostly, but I would counter that to say Hill didn’t seem to throw as many and he played on the same team.
So, if I upset you with my anti- Alex rhetoric, please understand that I am not dogging the guy per se, simply dogging our offense with him in it. I want people to see that we can’t be pleased with the Alex Smith experiment…it’s never netted us wins, and I don’t think it will if we “play to his strengths”
If we throw the ball 25+ times we will lose. do the research…I’m not lying.
You aren't lying huh?
AZ Game passed the ball 31 times
Seattle Game passed the ball 26 times
Rams Game didn’t really need to throw it (Defense and ST won the game)
If by that you mean when Shaun Hill was in there versus Alex Smith was in there then you would be right but you did not specify that so I am assuming you meant at all.
Also, I seriously doubt that Shaun Hill would have pulled off wins against:
Houston (where he led the team to a 0-21 deficit at half)
Indy (where it took a trick play for them to beat us. Consider Smith being sacked 4 times and hurried 12).
Tennesse (Which was a shootout. The last game where we needed to be in a shootout when Hill was in there was the Atlanta game, you remember that one?).
Green Bay (Another time that by poor playcalling the offense was stunted in the 1st half and the defense gave up 20. Not very confident Hill could have fired 3 TD’s the way Smith did to get us back in it at the end there. Again see Falcons game).
Now I anticipate that you might bring up the AZ game but before the 13 passes and 80 yards on the drive 9/18 with 129 yards NO TD’s. The defense earned alot of credit in that one holding AZ to what they did.
NOW…. if you look at the stats side-by-side you will see that Smith’s stats are far superior in the following: Comp %, Yards/ G, Yards/ Att, and the TD to INT ratio is nearly the same…. So tell me why again? I mean Hill, I like the guy and I actually thought he was better initially at the begining of the year but Alex Smith is a better QB than he was in years past and after seeing him play. whether we have won or lost, he does still give us the better chance to win.
I find it real hard to see that Hill would have made a difference in the outcome of the Houston game, the Indianapolis game, the Titans game, the Bears game, and the game today.
true but even with less hills turnover ratio is better than smith so just because he has put some numbers his mistakes make it worse. in one less game he has also thrown 7 ints and has only one win under his belt
We were losing before
Singletary put Smith in to replace Hill. We haven’t gotten blown out by 35 points at least since Smith has been in there….
Anyway, I am putting alot more blame on Jimmy Raye than either Smith or Hill. If it was up to me, he’d be gone Monday morning. The only problem is its past halfway and there is really nobody there to replace him… unless you consider the current QB Coach Mike Johnson. Not sure if he’d be any more or less inconsistant than Raye but I’d be willing to see the change if he was willing to stick to what we primarily did in the 2nd half of the Texans game and the 2nd half of today’s game for an entire game
raye
well raye might be under the bus but he has done well with finding ways to get vernon the ball and gore the ball we just need a solid game in all phases seems we cant do things in union there is doubt starting to grow in the locker room and with mounting amount of injuries things go forward look very grimm i would love mikey shanahan to come back to the bay
at the end of Texans game
….HOU hadn’t seen Alex Smith throw a football…no gameplan whatsoever for him. You saw it happen with Freeman in TB and VY in tennessee and a slew of running backs – Betts, Forsett, Shonn Greene….you have to temper those stats from the HOU game.
And, in yesterday’s game, Alex got those late drives with Kampman and Harris out for the GB defense, and GB was more than in control of the game by then.
We ran the ball 9 times yesterday, so I highly doubt Alex didn’t get ample opps to prove his capabilities. And thanks to Morgan’s return, he didn’t even have to string a drive together to get one of the late TD’s.
granted, we haven’t been blown out with A Smith…but box scores don’t tell you everything. And, when we were losing with Hill, he was at least keeping our DEF off the field and giving them long stretches of grass to defend. When we got blew out by ATL, we still managed to hold the ball for 5 more minutes in that game.
watch the film when alex first moves around to get out of the pocket he put his head down you make plays with your head down
Uhhh Hill has been sacked 18 times
Smith eludes the rush when he is not boxed in. Hill has trouble doing that. To me it seems like he has his head up field looking for people but nobody is getting open often enough on busted plays. Jason Hill seems to be the best WR we have that is able to break off a route on a busted play and get open. You kind of have to blame whoever is not putting him in on 2nd and Long or 3rd and Long situations for that.
The Tennessee game is a good reference for my notion in the example though.
And the reason I use that
is that it is still fresh in my mind… Smith does look up field though is the overall rebuttal (backed with evidence)
AZ
We held the ball for 32 minutes.
Defense played well.
Notice a correlation?
Yeah you’re right… Shaun Hill is the one responsible for the defense playing well.
C’mon really? This isn’t even a debate
maybe not...
for you, but for someone who understands defense as an element of offense, and offense as an element of defense- it makes good sense.
running the ball runs the clock, and when our defense isn’t on the field all day, they get turnovers.
Turnovers create short fields.
Right now, we’re not getting that advantage.
Nobody said Shaun Hill made the defense better, but he didn’t put them in bad spots, like Alex did vs TEN, CHI, GB….
in that game smart guy he completed less than 50% you defending a losing team as if i’m not a fan. i grew up with watching joe and steve and jeff garcia looked better than this bum bottom line is since 2005 whoever the cordinator alex has not produced enough to win football games
correction
He’s talking about the Bears game. In that game Smith completed 69.5% of his passes.
by David Fucillo on Nov 22, 2009 9:51 PM PST up reply actions
and really it was 7.
You’re just totally off today.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
so..
if the niners sweep the division..the still wont make the playoffs? inform me
If that sweep
Is part of a six game winning streak finish, then they likely make the playoffs as division winner. If that sweep is not accompanied by any other wins then yes, 7-9 will not make the playoffs.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
I still don’t trust Alex Smith at all, but he does have his flashes of brilliance. Jimmy Raye, on the other hand, has exhibited a Bochyan stubbornness and unwillingness to adapt, and as far as I’m concerned he needs to be fired yesterday.
Wall-E for Best Picture 2008
2009: The return of Los Galacticos!
A Tale of Two Offenses
It wasn’t the best of offenses. It wasn’t the worst of offenses. But when it was good, it was only pretty good, and when it was bad, it sucked.
If only the 49ers could put two decent halves of football together in the same game, they might be dangerous. But I’m not holding my breath.
What accounts for the inconsistency? Some would like to blame the coaches for the offense’s unproductive quarters. But the second-half almost comebacks suggest to me that the coaches are making some smart adjustments at halftime. Can they really be alternatively clueless and brilliant?
It seems more likely to me that it’s the players, not the coaches, who are inconsistent. In particular, Alex Smith seems and has always seemed pretty erratic. That’s not unique among quarterbacks. Favre is erratic and has been known to throw game-losing interceptions. But of course, his upside more than makes up for his downside. I’m not sure you could say that for Smith.
But I’m not suggesting it’s all Smith’s fault, nor do I think we’d be much better off with one of the alternatives. Although the coaches can try to fudge it by fiddling with the scheme, unless you have an exceptional quarterback, you’ve got to have a capable offensive line to succeed consistently. The Niners don’t have either.
We'll see them again in the playoffs! What channel is it on?
I'm of the thought...
That the best offense for Smith is the one where he doesn’t have to think. Because when he starts to think, bad things happen.
Well, we're waiting....
Jim Kelly and Warren Moon
were like that to a degree as well. Prob fixed with No-huddle-hurry-up AND Run-and-shoot.
Smith looked really good the second half
Good throws, good movement. Protection was better because we were running from the shotgun. This allowed for deeper passes as well. It’s not a hurry up offense, but this is the kind of offense we need to run if we want to win games.
out played
outplayed, out coached and beat down. we didn’t have a game plan to execute. we are a reactionary team. can’t win.
WHY NOT?!?!
The D’s problem is simple, they’re not bad, they just had a bad day against a pretty good offensive team. I am a little miffed though that they allowed over 120 yards to a RB who had little to no business gaining that many. I guess that’s what happens to the underrated backs. At some pont they break out, it just happens to have been against the Niners. Why do we always seem to allow the no names to become overnight sensations?
The Offense, can somebody PLEASE tell me why there is any reason why the Niners should NOT just make a decision to run in the very least 55-60% of their plays in some form of the shotgun and/or spread formation? Have we not realized that at this point there is no other way to make Smith comfortable at his position? If not, why did we draft this guy anyway? Because of numbers? If that’s the case, did we not understand what gave him the numbers to begin with? Or are we just masochists that thrive on seeing players fail season after season? If we don’t want to make due with what we have, let the guy stumble through the rest of the season and we’ll move on to the next QB. Mr. Davis, get ready looks like your time is coming.
Have we not realized that at this point there is no other way to make Smith comfortable at his position?
I think the reason the shotgun works for Smith is because it gives him more time behind the LOLine to make his reads. I really don’t like the “he used it in college, that’s why we should switch” argument. The guy has been in the NFL for 5 years now; I’m pretty sure he can start from under center. The real reason why the shotgun works for Smith is because it gives him more time to make his reads and not because he is only successful in some college system.

by 




























