The Apocalypse is near: An uncapped year and free agency (updated with links)
As we all know the CBA expires this year and there has been no news of any kind of progress being made on a new one. This means that 2010 will likely be an uncapped year. This brings to mind visions of players getting huge bucks and owners going wild with their money. On the surface it seems like a good thing for the players and a bad one for the owners. However, the reverse might be more true.
Join me below the jump as we talk about what the CBA does and what an uncapped year means for free agency.
The CBA
There are several things that need to be pointed out about the current CBA.
1. The current cap is 128 million (BTW the first salary cap was only 34 million)
2. There's also a minimum cap of 112.1 million.
3. Built into the salary cap are minimum wages for veterans
4. Right now players who are at the end of their contracts become unrestricted free agents after 4 accrued seasons.
5. If they have less than 4 accrued seasons they are restricted free agents.
There are also rules in place for length of contracts for players drafted in later rounds.
The salary cap has some interesting things about it. Every contract that is offered to a player has to be approved by the NFL to make sure that it doesn't go over the salary cap. If it does the team has to renegotiate. There are some tools in place to help with the salary cap though. Any signing bonuses are spread out over the length of the contract. For example we signed Aubrayo Franklin to a 3 year deal worth $6 million. $3 million of that was a signing bonus so that's spread out over 3 years of his contract. His base salary this year is $1.1 million, so he basically counts $2.1 million against the cap for us. A team can also sign a four-year veteran to the minimum and only have half that count towards the salary cap.
Many fans don't realize that there is also a minimum salary cap. Owners can't be cheapskates and pay a pittance to their team in the hopes of maximizing profits. The minimum is set at just over 87% of the maximum, and the maximum is based on the overall revenue generated by the NFL.
Veteran minimum salaries are as follows:
0 years--$310,000
1 year--$385,000
2 years--$460,000
3 years--$535,000
4-6 years--$620,000
7-9 years--$745,000
10+ years--$845,000
Free Agency
There are two types of free agents. There's the Unrestricted Free Agent, and a Restricted Free Agent
An Unrestricted Free Agent is a player who has reached the end of his contract and has at least 4 seasons in the league. The player has to have been on the 53 man roster (or on IR or PUP) for at least 6 games in a season to have the season count for him. This is called an accrued season.
A Restricted Free Agent is a player who has reached the end of his contract but does not have 4 accrued seasons. There are several levels of RFA, determined by the offer from the player's current team.
Level 1--Right of First Refusal (RFR). If a team offers $1.01 million dollars they have seven days to match any proposal that the player receives. If they do the player stays with his current team. If they don't the player is free to sign elsewhere and his old team receives no compensation.
Level 2--RFR + Original Draft Choice. Team offers $1.01 million or 110% of the previous year's salary (whichever is greater). If he signs with another team the player's old team gets a 2nd round choice from the new team.
Level 3--RFR + First round. Team offers $2.198 million or 110% of previous salary (whichever is greater). If he signs with another team they are compensated a 1st round choice
Level 4--RFR & 1st plus 3rd. Team offers $2.792 million or 110% of salary (whichever is greater). If the player is signed by another team his old team gets a 1st round and a 3rd round draft pick as compensation.
Franchise Tags
Teams have another way that they can keep players, and these are through the use of tags. There are two (well three really), tags that a team can use. There's the franchise tag, and the transition tag.
A team can designate one of it's RFA's or UFA's as a franchise player. At that point they need to determine if the player is going to be an exclusive franchise player or non-exclusive. An exclusive franchise player can not sign with any other team. His salary is going to be the average of the five largest salaries at his position (as of the end of free agency for that year), or 120% of his previous year's salary (whichever is largest). A non-exclusive player receives an offer of the average of the five largest salaries for the previous year or 120% (whcihever is greater). If the non-exclusive player signs with a new team his previous team will be compensated with two 1st round selections.
A transition tag can be used instead of the franchise tag. The transition tag gives the player's old team Right of First Refusal. The offer is the average of the top 10 players at his position or 120%, whichever is greater. If he signs with another team his original team receives no compensation.
2010 and the CBA
If a new CBA is not reached by 2010, all of this changes. There will be no salary cap, meaning teams can try and buy themselves a championship (like the New York Yankees). On the flip side of it, there's no minimum cap either, so miserly owners can spend as little as they like on player salaries. Some big name players will receive huge payouts, but the vast majority of players will not because there will be no veteran minimum. The biggest change is to the rules of free agency. Currently it takes 4 years in the league to become an unrestricted free agent. With an uncapped year it takes six years of accrued service to be a UFA. Teams will have one franchise tag and two transition tags available to them.
Let's look at some examples to make sense of what this means.
Our favorite nose tackle Aubrayo Franklin is a FA at the end of this year. He was drafted in 2003, so this is his 7th season making him an UFA in both a capped and uncapped year. We signed him in 2007 for $6.15 million ($3 million signing bonus). His salary this year is $2 million. His salary will undoubtedly be higher than that because nose tackles are included amongst regular tackles for wage purposes so Hayneworth's huge contract will be nice for Aubrayo
Someone who won't be happy about an uncapped year is San Diego LT Marcus McNeill who will be left out in the cold. He was drafted in the 2nd round in 2006 (50th overall) and signed a 4 year contract (which included a $1.24 million signing bonus). His base salary this year is a paltry $585,000. As an RFA San Diego could offer him a contract worth $2.792 million and receive a 1st and a 3rd if another team decided to pick him up anyway.
Will there be an uncapped year? Who knows. The NFLPA and the NFL have agreed to a media blackout so there isn't any real news coming out. A few months ago Goodell seemed positive that there would be an uncapped year, but there are some glimmers of hope.
In my experience negotiations between unions and employers generally come down to the last hour. Last fall the union I'm a member of renegotiated it's contract with my employer. For several months there was bluster back and forth with hardly any progress being made on the new contract. At 3AM on the day we were going to walk out on strike they got the deal done.
I kind of suspect that's what's going on now. There's been a media blackout which is something that generally happens when you're in discussions. It makes sense to both the players and the owners to get a job done. Profootballtalk has had some reports (rumors?) about progress in the negotiations. The league has sent a proposal to the NFLPA that includes a rookie wage scale. The NFLPA has also apparently formed several subcommitees to address various aspects of the proposal.
Because of the blackout news will be slow in coming, and anything that is released will be unreliable.
Sports Business Daily has about all the information available on the current status of negotiations. If there's more out there I haven't been able to find it.
Edit:
Fooch asked me to include some links to my sources so here they are.
Rotoworld (You can search for any NFL player and find their current salary and when they are a FA. The figure listed is their actual salary, not what their cap amount).
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Niners Nation's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Niners Nation's writers or editors.
7 recs |
25 comments
Comments
I think I misunderstood
I thought you were going to list the players available as well. I mentioned that you were going to in the FanPost I created.
by Drew K on Nov 28, 2009 3:29 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I will
Just wanted to get a post out explaining FA and and what happens if there’s no CBA in place.
by smileyman on Nov 28, 2009 8:58 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Great post smileyman!
I take it then that if SD only offers McNeil less than $2.198 million that the 49ers could pick him up for their 2nd round pick?
Not sure how the first two levels work out.
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
by Eastbayjim on Nov 28, 2009 10:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It doesn't seem likely that McNeil will be a draw to many teams that have a lot of holes and need their picks.
I wouldn’t mind giving up the 2nd but a 1st and 3rd, hell no. I think the Niners will address their more pressing needs via draft and not FA. It doesn’t appear that they would be able to acquire him without losing DP’s.
"Optimist Prime"
Yes 10fortech I am still pissed the crabtree pick wasn't traded!!
by rlott#42 on Nov 28, 2009 11:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Another thing to note
is that if 2010 is uncapped, there will likely never be a salary cap again in the NFL, which in general would mean bad things. Like you mentioned, no cap means no floor, and owners can go back to spending as little as they want (see: Tampa Bay).
The league is in serious jeopardy if 2010 is uncapped. Not in jeopardy of folding, but in jeopardy of becoming an extremely uninteresting league to follow.
by Andrew Davidson on Nov 28, 2009 6:37 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
never?
I think that’s a bit of an exaggeration. The uncapped year should be intriguing but to say there would likely never be a cap again? I just don’t see that.
by Fooch on Nov 28, 2009 10:13 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think owners, other than the rich ones, would like to have an uncapped league
"Optimist Prime"
Yes 10fortech I am still pissed the crabtree pick wasn't traded!!
by rlott#42 on Nov 28, 2009 10:33 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Also, from the looks of it I doubt that the NFLPA would want an Uncapped year.
Uncapped means fewer free agents and less money for the NFLPA.
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
by Eastbayjim on Nov 28, 2009 10:45 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Strike
2011 might be a strike year if there’s another uncapped year.
by Iwantwinners on Nov 28, 2009 1:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
How do you figure?
Capped years REQUIRE owners to spend a minimum amount. Cheapskate owners would LOVE an uncapped year. That means they could spend $60 million a year and RAKE in profits. This year they were required to spend $112 million.
Smiley posted a fantastic article and it probably took him a while to post it, so please read the WHOLE thing before you post.
by hudd07 on Nov 28, 2009 1:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Some owners will love an uncapped year
Most will hate it.
Guys like Daniel Snyder and Jerry Jones will go out and buy themselves a championship. Teams like Detroit, GB, and Minnesota will get the leftovers. High profile players will get huge payouts. Most will receive less than they otherwise would.
It’s in the best interests of the league and the union to reach some sort of agreement or the health of the sport could suffer. Take a look at baseball to see what I’m talking about.
New York Yankees salary in 2009 is $201,449,189.
7 AL Titles
5 WS Titles
The Florida Marlins salary in 2009 is $36,834,000
2 NL titles (1997, 2003)
2 WS titles (1997, 2003)
In both their postseason berths the Marlins were wildcards who then went on a streak to win it all. The Yankees have 7x the salary and practically buy themselves a championship each year.
The first year of the salary cap was 1994 and the amount was $34.6 million. The Niners salary for 1993 was just over $50 million.We restructured a bunch of contracts, franchised Steve Young, and won the Superbowl while barely meeting the salary cap. Of course those restructured contracts bit us later on.
by smileyman on Nov 28, 2009 6:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The Cap will be back
The two biggest issues are:
1. Revenue sharing between owners. A few of the better owners feel they are paying the lesser owners for doing nothing. This issue has nothing to do with the players. I do think the better owners have a point. Of course Dallas is a big market but Jerry Jones also works his market harder and better than other owners.
2. The percentage of revenue spent on players. Right now I think the players receive 55%-60% of the revenue and the owners think the pie portion should come back down to 50%. The lower tier of owners claim they are floating just above water and need more money to counter their perceived risk.
Possibly the 3rd issue is has to do with post player health issues and medical expenses. Than again this more a player to player issue than an issue for the owners.
by bignerd on Nov 28, 2009 10:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Revenue sharing
It’s a complex issue and I can understand where owners like Jerry Jones are coming from.
Right now the CBA mandates that owners spend 60% of their revenue on player salaries (this is where the salary cap comes in at). Owners get money in several ways.
1. TV deal. This is the biggie. The revenue generated through the network deals is split evenly between the teams. Fair enough since the tv schedule is determined by the league.
2. Gate receipts. Interestingly enough, teams only keep 60% of their gate receipts. The rest goes into the general fund to be split amongst the rest of the teams. (This does not include revenues generated from other events besides the games, nor from sponsorship deals for your stadium.) This is the reason why teams tend to not buy unsold tickets—they’re losing 40% of the value and not getting it all back.
3. Merchandise. When a fan goes out and buys that Crabtree jersey, the money doesn’t go to the Niners—instead it goes to the league to be split amongst the teams.
I do understand where some of the more successful owners are coming from. The Raiders routinely sell more merchandise than any other team but have to split that money with the league. The Packers sell a ton of merchandise as well.
However, as long as there is a salary cap revenue sharing can’t go away. Some teams are blessed with great markets—Dallas is a much better market than is Green Bay.
If I was a betting man I would structure revenue sharing just like player contracts. Teams receive a base minimum and if they hit certain goals they receive bonuses
I think that owners who want to do away with revenue sharing are being short-sighted. Pro football is the most popular sport in America, and certainly the most profitable. A large part of that is the revenue sharing that levels the playing field. I’d hate to see it go away.
by smileyman on Nov 28, 2009 11:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Cap versus Minimum
The NFL/NFLPA can still have a salary cap but just lower the salary floor to compromise.
by sfgfan on Dec 2, 2009 9:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Rec'd.
Good post, thanks.
I was "Deific16"
The cake is a lie.
by Sultan of Seitan on Nov 29, 2009 12:11 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
There may not be major strides being made
but at least comminication is constant and both parties want resolution. I believe a new one will be in place before the 2010 Season kicks off
by Drew K on Nov 29, 2009 11:27 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
So would it be like madden when you turn salary cap off in franchise mode?
because that is very easy in terms of getting good players
Go 49ers
by iaalexeeff on Dec 1, 2009 8:03 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
No
there will be alot of high priced underachieving talent available in the offseason if that happens…or doesn’t happen I should say. A new agreement that is. I think it will get done. Goodell seems very proactive with it and all parties involved want to resolve.
by Drew K on Dec 1, 2009 11:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
question?
if we go to an uncapped year does this hurt the 49ers? or help them? San Fran is not a big time market like say new york but were not that small like green bay. I think i saw somewhere if they do get a cap going 49ers will have one of the best cap situations.
by 49ersAllTheWay on Dec 1, 2009 10:32 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
We've got a pretty good cap situation
but who knows what the next cap amount will be. If it’s an uncapped year the number of players available drops dramatically so that definitely hurts it.
by smileyman on Dec 1, 2009 11:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Would Help
The current 49ers regime believes in drafting and keeping their own players almost to a pathetic hole at RT fault. The embargo with no labor agreement plays right into this strategy. If a new agreement is signed with no cap, than it probably hurts over the long run.
by bignerd on Dec 1, 2009 11:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
An uncapped year may mean less than you think ...
Because the owners are definitely going to assume there will be a cap in the future – and probably a lower one than there is now.
So teams might offer lucrative one-year contracts, or front-load contracts, but a big multi-year deal could be crippling in a year if the cap comes back hard.
I could see teams that feel they’re ready to win a championship spending a lot of money, but second-tier teams (eg, teams which expect to be in the playoffs, but realistically have little chance to win it all) may choose to wait a year when the top tier teams have to cut talent to get under the new cap.
by Ronaldinho on Dec 1, 2009 11:53 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
It might be a lower percentage
Right now it’s 60% of the revenue of the shared revenue, but as the NFL gains in popularity the actual dollar amount will be sure to increase.
by smileyman on Dec 2, 2009 12:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
thanks for the info guys
was unsure of how this might affect the niners, now with this i have maybe a bit more understanding. I just dont want it to be like baseball when the yankees buy their championships every year. thats why i hate baseball and love football.
by 49ersAllTheWay on Dec 2, 2009 2:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 























