Mike Singletary Monday lunch press conference: Eagles edition
The 49ers have returned from a not so successful trip back east to Philadelphia. As is the tradition on Monday, Singletary will be answering questions from the media today, beginning at 11:45. After yesterday's game, Singletary gave Alex Smith a relative "vote of confidence," so I'd imagine we'll get several questions about that. And of course we'll get some comments on the team being eliminated from playoff contention. I'm sure we'll hear about how the team will continue to play hard and build towards next season, etc, etc.
Feel free to discuss the press conference here, and for those who miss it, I'll have the transcript posted later today (usually late afternoon).
79 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Wow
Some genius just asked: How do you feel about not making the playoffs. Singletary responded with: You’ve been sitting here for a while. How do you think I feel?
I love bad questions.
yeah,
i bet he’s going to disneyland now
by srill waiting on Dec 21, 2009 12:42 PM PST up reply actions
Stupid adveristment script has been crashing my browser for 36 hours now
Does SB Nation even bother to test before publishing for quality review?
The NFL Playoffs are on your phone now crashing your browser now
hmmm
I haven’t had any problems with it. I’ll pass along your issue to our tech folks.
by David Fucillo on Dec 21, 2009 1:01 PM PST up reply actions
I’m using Firefox and it ceases to respond after 15 minutes being on this website. I do think it’s the Sprint SB Ad because its new and I haven’t had this problem going to my favorite SB Nation basketball website.
If you’re using Firefox, why aren’t you using adblock? No ads, problem solved.
Juan Carlos Perez, please start hitting.
I’m not a fan of ad-blockers. They falsely identify many graphics and I have a job where sometimes I need to see the advertisements.
This page has a ton of stuff to load..
It’s worse on my netbook, which is way slower than the iMac with FF.
Well, we're waiting....
I use Firefox
I don’t have any gizmos of ad blocking or anything like that, and I have no problem and I’m always on this bad boy.
My safari tends to lock up when I have been on this site for a period of time.
Usually it happens when I click on a post that does not want to fully load. I close down my browser and when I reopen it things are usually better.
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
alex smith is destined for Trent Dillferism. Its a disease that quarterbacks get when they have some talent and great potential and just end up sucking at the end of the day. He will retire some day with a super bowl ring, i can just feel it, thing is he wont be on our team and wont be on the field when it is won, he will be holding a stud QB’s clip board as said stud QB wins the big one.
I don't know...
I was looking at it the other day, and the number of quarterbacks in the league who didn’t start to get really good until after they turned 25 is almost staggering.
Chad Pennington: 26
Carson Palmer: 26
Ben Roethlisberger: 25
David Garrard: 29
Vince Young: 26
Matt Schaub: 27
Philip Rivers: 25
Kyle Orton: 27
Tony Romo: 26
Eli Manning: 27
Jason Campbell: 27/28
Drew Brees: 25
Jake Delhomme: 29
Kurt Warner: 28
Matt Hasselbeck: 27
The only real exceptions are Peyton Manning, Tom Brady, Brett Favre, Donovan McNabb, and Joe Flacco.
Kind of opened my eyes to look at that.
I don't know about that, to the groin.
by howtheyscored on Dec 21, 2009 2:03 PM PST up reply actions
(Without a long-term statistical model in place, though, the perceived importance of this, of course, completely depends on how much you value age as a tool for evaluating player development – I happen to value it a lot, though I admit this POV is highly influenced by baseball and probably doesn’t apply quite as cleanly to the NFL.)
I don't know about that, to the groin.
by howtheyscored on Dec 21, 2009 2:17 PM PST up reply actions
That's an interesting stat
I wonder how much of it is a maturity thing, and how much of it is the franchise drafting a QB before they draft a decent supporting cast
Yes Drew K, Tim Tebow will get picked in the first round.
Probably a little from column A and a little from column B. On a case by case basis, I’d say guys like Roethlisberger, Garrard, Young, Manning, Campbell, and Brees are clear cases of guys who just matured. Guys like Delhomme, Orton, and Hasselbeck might be good examples of supporting cast guys. Some of the others could be good examples of guys who didn’t even get a snap until later in life to begin with: Romo, Warner… even Rivers.
And I completely forgot Rodgers (25) on that list, who is a good example of all three!
I don't know about that, to the groin.
by howtheyscored on Dec 21, 2009 2:31 PM PST up reply actions
a fair amount of psychology research
suggests that 25 is about the age when a person’s adult personality really becomes what it is going to be. up to that point you are really still learning on a lot of different levels. obviously this is an over-simplification on my part but my point is just that it wouldn’t be surprising that at a more cognitive position like qb, things would click around that age. at least in terms of playing against other grown men.
How much has an OC or offense heavy HC influenced those guys?
Hass did not become consistent until he had Holmgren. Warner had Martz. Delhomme had vet OC Hennings. Brees took statistically took off when joined with Payton. Rivers with Cam Cameron then Norv. Schaub with Kubiak. Eli with Gilbride.
I don’t consider Garrard, Orton or Campbell to be anywhere better than Smith (I’m sure that’ll bring some strong opposition). The latter names (minus Flacco for me; too small a sample size) shows that at any one time in the NFL, there are only 3-5 truly great QBs. Everyone else is winning with a good QB, complimentary running game and, if they get enough defense, they challenge to win a SB.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
Well, I’d say that Hass didn’t become consistent when he had Holmgren. he went through two pretty growing pains-full years after he got to the Seahawks. Brees, also, started to take off statistically while he was still with San Diego.
I won’t argue you on Garrard, but even if Smith’s upside is still higher, I think Orton and Campbell are both better than he is right now (but I’m a professed believer in both guys – to my mind, Campbell is pretty darn underrated).
Clearly there is a lot going on that feeds into the list I put up above, and I definitely threw a very wide blanket when making the list. I just thought it was interesting to look at.
I don't know about that, to the groin.
by howtheyscored on Dec 21, 2009 2:44 PM PST up reply actions
I wanted your feedback
Like, in your opinion, if Hass never had Holmgren, would he be a 20TD 25 INT guy that ended up a permanent backup? If Brees stayed in SD or signed with Miami, would he be thoght of us as an above average QB who needs tons of help to win a SB? I wonder how much these guys both developed and were allowed to make plays thanks to coaching and surrounding talent. In comparison to Smith of course whose development was stunted by a number of factors. How much can coaching elevate his talent and will the reps he’s now receiving contribute to his development.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
It’s really hard to say when we get into hypotheticals. I don’t think Hasselbeck would have done anything without Holmgren because I think he was Holmgren’s pet project in a league that didn’t really think Hasselbeck would ever be any good (if I remember correctly). I don’t think he would have ever had a chance without Holmgren.
Brees, I think, would have been great anywhere that wasn’t completely incompetent. it’s hard to say if his shoulder could have wiithstood, say, landing in Houston, but man he’s just so good.
With other guys, I think it’s really hard to tell. Personally, I hope Campbell hits the Free Agent market because if he lands himself on a team that can actually play offense I think he’s going to surprise a lot of people. He’s a guy where I think the system he’s in is holding him back.
On the other hand, a guy like Warner (great as he is) really seems to be a system / supporting cast kind of QB.
What I think the biggest factor in a lot of these guys, though, is that teams waited to give them a chance to develop. Is Hasselbeck anything if the coaches give up on him because he sucks when he’s 25? Is Jake Delhomme even in the league if he’s been written off by the time he’s 27? And he went to a Super Bowl!
Drew Brees almost lost his career because the Chargers weren’t going to wait for him to develop. What are all those people who wanted Vince Young out of Tennessee a year and a half ago thinking today? “Boy, I’m glad the team didn’t listen to me!”
A lot of things have to go right. For a lot of guys, it takes a perfect marriage of coaching and surrounding talent. For other guys, it just takes a little extra time. For still more, it will never matter and they’ll always be terrible. But no matter what the case, it seems that with the exception of a few total elite guys, it takes time.
I don't know about that, to the groin.
by howtheyscored on Dec 21, 2009 3:04 PM PST up reply actions
I agree
I actually recall Brees just being okay in SD, unable to win a playoff game or take advantage of have a young Tomlinson as his RB. But he also had a more conservative play caller and no WRs worth mentioning. And as you said, he was a young guy still developing. Just imagine had he gone to Miami under Saban. We might think of him the way you are describing Campbell and most fans would think he’s not worth the risk.
Delhomme got a shot because Peete was injured in a season opener. Warner a chance because of Green’s injury. All this certainly supports the idea of giving Alex time. I think his draft status is the main reason fans are quick to direct anger at him.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
I think his draft status is the main reason fans are quick to direct anger at him.
This
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Dec 21, 2009 6:53 PM PST up reply actions
I think it's because Smith hasn't shown..
That he can play in the League is why fans are frustrated in the continued emphasis from the team on Smith.
Well, we're waiting....
I think he has shown that he’s capable of being very effective. He has not shown that he’s capable of doing it consistently.
I don't know about that, to the groin.
by howtheyscored on Dec 21, 2009 7:43 PM PST up reply actions
Maybe in certain situations he is effective...
But outside of that, he is still very limited and mechanically unsound. I just don’t see the fluidity in his play. Sure you adjust to his strengths, but those are limited as well, and that limits the offense as a whole.
I can’t see him leaning a whole basic skill set (like playing from behind center and using 3-7 step drops) and excelling in that in just one off season. He still has limited vision, and the game at times still confuses him.
The team still has to improve in areas, but I still think the weak link after they do that will be Smith.
Well, we're waiting....
I really think his biggest problems are his tendency to (sometimes wildly) overthrow when his feet aren’t set, and his mismanagement of the playclock. I think we’ve seen some periods where he’s gotten some protection and gotten into a rhythm (the second half in Houston, the second half in Green Bay) where he’s looked extremely good, making good reads and confident throws.
I also think we’ve seen a game where he was able to manage a complete gameplan and run it successfully from the shotgun and from under center: the Seattle game.
I also think we’ve seen games where he hasn’t been sharp (Arizona) or when the pressure forces (very) bad throws out of him (Philadelphia).
I like what I’ve seen when he’s been good. I’ve been discouraged by what I’ve seen when he’s knocked out of his rhythm. It’s the fact that he isn’t consistent about being good, that he still kills himself with overthrows and delay penalties, that he still occasionally forces a throw into coverage when pressured, that are his bugaboos.
But I think he’s definitely shown us more than a few flashes of some extremely proficient quarterback play.
I don't know about that, to the groin.
by howtheyscored on Dec 21, 2009 8:06 PM PST up reply actions
Yep.
And as part of Smith’s development, he has gone up against some very talented and well coached defenses this season whose strengths are their secondaries (Indy, GB, Philly). The latter two are also known for their various coverages that occasionally confuse experiences QBs. It’s good that he has had this opportunity and the film from which he and his receivers can learn.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
Well...
If the O-Line managed to protect him, it would be less likely to happen. QB’s can’t effectively play if they spend all game on their back.
Being a more effective threat as a passer..
can help an o-line, even a tepid one in the 49ers. In other words, defenses fear him rather than he fearing the defenses.
Well, we're waiting....
I think you might be underestimating exactly how bad the 49ers’ offensive line is this season. It’s really terrible.
I don't know about that, to the groin.
by howtheyscored on Dec 21, 2009 8:54 PM PST up reply actions
Oh, I've known that for the past few seasons..
I LOL’d when Nolan hired Martz because they would be giving up a ton of sacks in his offense with that line. But an experienced QB can help compensate a poor line with quick reads and a greater understanding of offense. Dump off to a back, hit the underneath, etc. I don’t know if Smith can throw a short slant yet, and he still misses screens.
I dunno, the o-line is what it is, but a QB can’t regress because of it. He has to try to get above it.
Well, we're waiting....
Slot receiver...
Would be required for that to work. You’d need a Wes Welker style option for Alex Smith to throw to for that passing threat to become real. Under the current half baked, introduced halfway through the season playbook, the routes they are running are way to long (as in time consuming) to make them an effective threat against the blitz.
Get some shorter routes, draws, screens, hooks, curls, slants, and short drags, as well as a receiver who can run them and catch a hot ball thrown under pressure… and we’ve got ourselves a solution to a significant problem.
Well, that's what you expect out of a backup QB...
One that has a few abilities, but still doesn’t have the complete package that will carry through 4 quarters of football, and still is a question mark in a limited scheme.
Flashes of talent is Smith’s career in a nutshell. Small flashes at that. That’s not enough to be confident in the QB position.
Eventually, the 49ers will have a QBOTF emerge, but they will hopefully have a stable to choose from that isn’t all predicated on flashes.
Well, we're waiting....
Yeah, but who are you going to play in the meantime? I’d rather prepare for the future by putting together that stable of QBs AND playing Smith on the offchance that he does fulfill his potential while we’re waiting for new player x to develop. If he doesn’t develop, he was a decent stopgap for said player x. If he does develop, then we have a very good problem.
I don't know about that, to the groin.
by howtheyscored on Dec 21, 2009 8:58 PM PST up reply actions
There’s some pronoun confusion there, but it should be pretty easy to navigate. Sorry about that.
I don't know about that, to the groin.
by howtheyscored on Dec 21, 2009 8:59 PM PST up reply actions
Well, that's my whole issue..
The 49ers since drafting Smith didn’t do anything outside of drafting Davis last year at the QB position, due to they putting it all on Smith. My problem is, the 49ers need to install an offense for the future that isn’t predicated on whether Smith get’s it or not, and if he doesn’t, the next guy will have a fair shot because the rest of the offense knows the system. The 49ers have had it backwards from the day Nolan was hired. That’s why I screamed for a offensive HC when he was fired.
Smith has a long ways to go. I dunno man, I think his development will take more than one off season for him to be more than a capable QB. My fear is that he will hold the rest of the offense back due to having to adjust the scheme to fit his limitations. That eventually works against you.
The 49er can’t get complacent at QB. They can’t afford to.
Well, we're waiting....
The 49er can’t get complacent at QB. They can’t afford to.
That I definitely agree with, and it’s why I think it’s so very important to see Smith in for as many snaps as possible over the last two games. If we get two more games of film on him, then we’ll have a much better idea of how early in the draft we’ll reach for a QB.
Even if he does well, I don’t see any good reason to wait more than three rounds. I imagine he’ll have to struggle quite a bit to convince the team to grab a QB in the first round, though.
And I say this in part because I spend so much time defending Smith. It can often seem that my opinion doesn’t go the other way at all. But even I think we have to seriously consider drafting a quarterback in the first three rounds regardless of what Smith does in these last two games. I would love to see Smith blossom next year, but there’s absolutely nothing wrong with covering that base.
I don't know about that, to the groin.
by howtheyscored on Dec 21, 2009 9:18 PM PST up reply actions
I'm not a Smith hater..
I just don’t see much of a “Natural” feel for the game from him. Now, a lot of that is all about his development, and he needs to forget a lot of what’s be taught in the past, but the day I see him become a Red Ass like Phillip Rivers behind center and get that ball out with fire and authority while hitting them in stride, and being able to throw every route and hit the underneath stuff, pump fakes, audibles….
Aw hell, I’m dreaming here.
Well, we're waiting....
That's a bit platitude heavy
I kid because you use that card on so many posters.
I actually like Rivers a great deal and have since he became a starter, despite many people I know thinking he’s a jerk. But his type of fiery leadership is unique and not representative of most QBs. Manning, Brady, Brees, McNabb and Warner are not on that level of outward emotion.
I actually heard Steve Young discuss this in an interview, saying that though it works for Rivers, it’s a lot of wasted energy for a position that is already too demanding. I understand why you want a QB that shows more fire authority than Alex but I think the RIvers model is not likely to be attainable.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
What I want to see..
out of Smith is command. Gannon was a Red Ass but he had to be with that team. If Smith showed me that he has total command of the offense in all phases of it, then I would have more confidence going forward. I just put Rivers out there because he is a young QB who plays with that chip on his shoulder like he has something to prove, which almost every great QB has. You don’t have to yell and scream, but you have to have command of the offense and the players in it.
Well, we're waiting....
I can agree with that
But I’d also say that right now QBs as a whole are much better than they were 10 years ago. Defenses are bigger, stronger, faster, smarter.The game is much more complex. It’d be interesting to take legends from years past and see how they would perform in today’s game.
Yes Drew K, Tim Tebow will get picked in the first round.
Also: I’m definitely a Joe Flacco fanboy. Man, he’s good.
I don't know about that, to the groin.
by howtheyscored on Dec 21, 2009 2:21 PM PST up reply actions
actually Favre didn't get to be good until he went from Atlanta to Green Bay.
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
He went to Green Bay when he was 23, and he actually had a pretty darn great season at that age. He slumped at the age of 24, but hit his stride again at 25 and never looked back.
I don't know about that, to the groin.
by howtheyscored on Dec 21, 2009 7:01 PM PST up reply actions
bbbsssss
age is a number this guy has had five yerars in the league watching ang playing. garbage thought when these guys stepped on the field they won games sb’s playoffs your boy alex has done none of the above. straight trash is on pace to throw more than 20 ints if he played the whole year he is trash get over it he turns the ball over as much as he throws touchdowns and if you look at games within seven points when does this kid deliever a lead change never he is wack. he does not have the ability to win games. his leadership is non exsistant his looks for someonelse to do his job. scary qb who does not win period..
Have you ever written a legible sentence?
You have had at least five years to learn how! Your leadership is non-existent, who would want to follow your writing style? You are on pace to write at least 20 trash sentences in every paragraph. Get over you lack of writing skills! Go back to school, or at least buy a grammar book.
dude
i’m from the east coast i’m drunk right now ok are you saying you dont get the feeling to what i’m saying realy grammar really so you dont understand my meaning
Age isn’t actually just a number. It has very clear connections to athletic development and personal maturity. Those connections are extremely defined in something like baseball, but I’ve never actually seen them looked at with regard to football. Without doing a better analysis, I found it compelling to just look around the league and see that the only current quarterbacks who were truly good at a younger age than Smith were Manning, Brady, and McNabb.
What does that mean in a football context? Well, I would have to be much more thorough in my study to tell you that. I might put myself up to it someday. But it certainly seems compelling to me.
I don't know about that, to the groin.
by howtheyscored on Dec 22, 2009 8:02 AM PST up reply actions
my point was
i was bent last night my point was age is tied to experience, and i would ask if your going to do such a study to look at it not from the age perspective but the fact he has had five years. then take what qbs needed five seasons to come around to being at least decent.
I’m definitely not denying the importance of experience. I just have this feeling that it often gets overstated when looking at these somewhat extreme cases.
To be completely hyperbolic and ridiculous, would you expect a 20 year old to be decent in the NFL if you started him from the time he was 15? Yes, I know that’s insane, but it helps to illustrate the point.
It’s one thing to say, “how many players take five seasons to become decent?” because most quarterbacks are at least 22 when they come into the league. After five seasons, they’re already 27 – and entering their prime.
It’s another thing altogether to say, “how many quarterbacks came into the league when they were just 20 years old, and what did their developmental paths look like?”
Knowing what other 20-year-old quarterbacks looked like over time is much more important to understanding the age vs. experience question here than simply asking about other quarterbacks who spent five years in the league.
I don't know about that, to the groin.
by howtheyscored on Dec 22, 2009 9:57 AM PST up reply actions
I’m currently looking for anybody who I can compare based on an age-scale. Right now the youngest QB draft pick I’ve seen is JaMarcus Russell, who took his first NFL snap at the tender age of 22.
I don't know about that, to the groin.
by howtheyscored on Dec 22, 2009 10:02 AM PST up reply actions
And I should correct myself: Alex Smith was 21 in his first season. Not 20.
I don't know about that, to the groin.
by howtheyscored on Dec 22, 2009 10:03 AM PST up reply actions
The list of notable 21 and 22 year old quarterbacks since 1980... it's not a very long list.
22 As a Rookie
JaMarcus Russell
Aaron Rodgers
Dan Orlovsky
Ben Roethlisberger
Kyle Boller
Drew Brees
Marquis Tuiasosopo
Tim Couch
Daunte Culpepper
Cade McNown
Shaun King
Peyton Manning
Ryan Leaf
Steve McNair
Trent Dilfer
Todd Marinovich
Brett Favre
Andre Ware
Randall Cunningham
Todd Blackledge
Dan Marino
Neil Lomax
Mark Malone
21 As a Rookie
Michael Vick
Drew Bledsoe
Tommy Maddox
So, basically, from that list: take guys who make good comparisons to Alex Smith – if possible, they should come from the list of 21 year olds, but that doesn’t seem likely! Since the list is short, it remains unreliable, but it also shows how little data we have to go on when evaluating the question of age versus experience for quarterbacks.
I don't know about that, to the groin.
by howtheyscored on Dec 22, 2009 10:20 AM PST up reply actions
I find it kind of amazing that since 1980, only four quarterbacks have been selected who were 21 years old in their rookie season. Only four! And one was Michael Vick!
I don't know about that, to the groin.
by howtheyscored on Dec 22, 2009 10:20 AM PST up reply actions
ok
would you conclude that it would be a mistake to take someone so young because of the lack of data. meaning that its not very smart to go after such a young qb in the first place.
It’s obviously much riskier, but of the 21-year-olds shown there, all of them had periods of success on the NFL. Of the 22-year-olds, it would be crazy to think that not drafting Manning or Marino or Rodgers or Roethlisberger or McNair or Favre or Cunningham based on their ages would be a good idea.
Having less data definitely makes it more risky, though. Drafting as young as 21 for a player who isn’t knock your socks off good is probably a bad idea.
I don't know about that, to the groin.
by howtheyscored on Dec 22, 2009 10:32 AM PST up reply actions
football
hard to say 20 is very young for football and i dont exactly know but it for sure doesnt happen very often. NBA has been successfull taking kids from highschool and devolping them on the court and it has worked out very well. but football is very different and i think age itself doesnt put these guys in there prime but the experience of seeing and playing the game at the nfl level. alex simth being 25-26 has had time on and off the field to see the game. he just isnt very good by comparison to other starting qbs and is no where near being a top 10 qb and for the organization i think if we want championships thats what we need to find.
dilfer
i can’t stand him. anyways, i was watching nfl live and merrill hoge was just hating having to share cameratime with dilfer. it almost looked like he wanted to kick his ass at one point. funny stuff.
by srill waiting on Dec 21, 2009 2:05 PM PST up reply actions
I know this is off topic...
But i really hate, hate Philly…
http://deadspin.com/5431473/its-always-snowing-in-philadelphia?autoplay=true
saw that
I was gonna embed the video here, but Philly fans just aren’t worth it. I know they’re not all awful, but they look pretty classless here.
by David Fucillo on Dec 21, 2009 1:57 PM PST up reply actions
Philly fans absolutely suck . . .
However, it’s the best franchise to bust out the “show me your SB ring”. That franchise is more pathetic than Buffalo. Always an excuse to why they can never win the big one. They are the Atlanta Braves of football. Post season, so what . . . some team is circling them down as a playoff win.
I'd say Philly
Oakland fans are sheep.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Dec 21, 2009 6:54 PM PST up reply actions
Cowboys fans
are the worst!! they always think theyr going to win it all…hahha
"Im not a numbers guy, im a Football player"
-M.Crabtree
Tim Brown of the Merc...
Has the transcript of the press conference up on his blog.
A couple of key quotes (I think)…
On whether or not Smith has hit “the wall”
bq."First of all, I have not seen Alex hit a wall. I have to be very honest there, that is why I am looking forward to the next two games. I have not seen him hit a wall. I think he has been consistent. We can go back to the Tennessee game and you say, ‘Hey, he had four turnovers.’ No, no he didn’t. There was some help that he had in that game, and it was the same in this game. It is a shame to me that every time a quarterback throws an interception that automatically it’s him. The guy is off, well he stinks. I think it is very important, and you have to evaluate it as the coach and make sure that you are looking at that quarterback and not destroy him and forget about the other parties involved. Is it the line, are they giving him enough protection? Is it the receivers, are they getting where they are supposed to go? Is there a trust factor, that receiver, can he trust him? There are a lot of different issues, which is why when I look at the film I am very encouraged. I don’t have a situation in here where I am sitting back thinking, ‘Man, I thought Alex was making progress and now I don’t know.’ I’m not there at all, I promise you. I feel very good about his progression and the fact that he has only played a month and a half, maybe two, I am very encouraged by what I have seen in a short amount of time for a guy who has been out of football for a couple of years."
Is Smith showing growth each week?
bq. "Yes, I am. When I look at Alex, I think each week he’s continued to grow. I think he’s done a lot in a short amount of time. There are some quarterbacks around the league, and I’m not going to get into that, but that’s been playing a while, and I don’t think as efficient as he is right now. So, to me, when I’m looking at him and some of the things that he’s been able to do, and some of things that he did last night, some of the decisions that he made, I think some of the things that have been happening right now for him, it’s just that experience factor. It’s just getting the timing down with the receivers more, and those little trap plays there whether it’s a two or four, he’s going to have a better feel for if that safety is really going to go with that tight end, or is that corner really going to go with the No. 1 receiver. All that is is just seeing it long enough, going through it long enough so you have a feel for it. But, I’m comfortable with what I’m seeing right now."
On those three first half interceptions
bq. The first interception that he threw, he was throwing the ball to [TE] Vernon [Davis], and to be honest with you, I just think Vernon has to make a better play on that ball. I think the ball was there. It’s just one of those situations where Vernon either has to make that play, or either he has to stop that DB from making that play. He’s got to help the quarterback as well. Vernon is going to be a great tight end one day, but he’s got to put the whole package together. That was the first interception. The second interception that Alex threw, it looks like the defense was playing two-man. The same sort of thing happened when we played Tennessee, where they had sort of like a four-man, where when the tight end takes off up the field, the safety is going to take off with him, and then the quarterback is getting back in a rhythm and it’s like, the ball is out. So, when you have a quarterback that’s as efficient as Alex can be and is getting the ball out and getting it to the receivers, then what you do from time to time is do a trap two. It’s a trap coverage where you’re throwing the ball on timing, and it looks like the receiver, or the defender is going with that receiver, and about one-thousand-one, one-thousand-two, you come back and get in front of the second guy that the quarterback is going to try and throw the ball to because he feels that either the corner or the safety has run off, but they come back. So, that’s what happened last night on the second coverage. I know that doesn’t make any sense to you, but I’m trying to explain it within the time frame that I can. But, I can understand why it happened; you just don’t want it to happen. The last interception he threw was just a poor decision. He’s trying to – the guy has him, he’s trying to make a throw to [RB] Frank [Gore]. It’s a bad decision. So, when I look at his play other than that, he’s getting the ball out, he’s throwing the ball where it needs to be. He threw some nice balls, out patterns – wherever you want it. He was making some pretty good throws.
In a note of great sadness to me, he did not use any of my historical metaphors to describe the O-Line’s pass protection in Philadelphia. I was hoping for a “The Titanic’s hull did a better job keeping out the water,” or “The Maginot Line did a better job keeping out the Nazis” or “The Great Wall of China did a better job keeping out the Mongolian herds.”
Herds?
Did the Mongols bring along their sheep and cattle for the ride?
Yes Drew K, Tim Tebow will get picked in the first round.

by 









































