Niners Nation Scouting Report: Jeremy Maclin, WR Missouri
One area where the 49ers have long needed an upgrade is a game-breaking receiver. They've lacked such a threat since Terrell Owens left town. Josh Morgan could conceivably have that rare combination of size and speed but it is waaaaay too soon to make that sort of judgment. Mock drafts (to be updated later today) have been starting to project Missouri burner Jeremy Maclin to the 49ers (and many even higher) and people have started clamoring for the man with the sub-4.3 40.
Given that, now seemed as good a time as any to put together a scouting report. SB Nation has a Mizzou blog, RockMNation, and they've been producing Maclin-related reports for several other teams including our Jags and Titans bloggers. I've compiled that info, along with some additional info to help us get a better idea about the speedster from Mizzou. He certainly seems talented, but I have questions about whether he's a guy the 49ers should really be targeting at #10.
If you take the numbers by themselves, clearly he's a beast. He led the nation in all purpose yards per game with 202.4 per game. He finished sixth in the nation with 102 receptions and eleventh with 1,260 yards. He runs a 4.29 40, and if he can come anywhere close to that at the Combine, he'll be in good shape. Of course, we know the numbers can't be examined in a vacuum. Missouri runs a spread offense that finished fourth in the nation in passing. One has to factor in this and other issues when looking at Maclin.
RockMNation thoughts
On his skills strictly as a wide receiver (as opposed to return man):
Because of Maclin's sheer athleticism and speed, people seem to completely overlook what a great set of hands the kid has. I can't recall one dropped pass or one sideline throw within reason where he wasn't able to go up and get it and establish himself in bounds. He's shown the ability to go get the ball at its highest point, and, like I said earlier, go over the middle with continued success.
If there's one concern with Maclin, though, it has to be the power that runs with (or without). I couldn't count the number of HUGE plays that might had been over the last two seasons if Maclin had been able to keep his feet. In open space, no one is going to catch the guy. But if you can get close enough to trip him up or knock him off-balance, the guy is almost more than likely to go down. He's never really shown an ability to fight through tackles, and I think that and his size are really the only two red flags I see in his game.
On his toughness:
His toughness is hard to evaluate because it is hard to define. Outside of the blown knee in 2006 and missing a quarter or so of the 2008 season opener, Maclin never really missed any significant time. However, Maclin did seem to have a tendency to get "nicked up" rather often. I could probably count six or seven times over two years that J-Mac was slow to get up, hobbled to the sideline, or favored a bruised shoulder. Maclin never seemed fazed by it, though, as he was usually back on the field making plays a play or two later. I would never question Maclin's mental toughness though. He's shown a remarkably cool head in his time at Mizzou, and despite being an "explosive" breed of receiver, he's gone over the middle and into traffic whenever asked and performed at a very high level. He got rocked going over the middle a number of times in his career, only to bounce back up and torch those same defenders later in the game.
On his work ethic:
I've never heard a bad word about Maclin's work ethic. Maclin was a transcendent type of athlete for Mizzou in 2007, so no one would have had any concern if he strolled into 2008 as that same player. What was scary, though, is that he didn't become complacent. He added weight and worked with coaches relentlessly, improving his route running and his mental handle of the game. QB Chase Daniel and the Missouri coaches were effusive about Maclin's offseason work, again quoting how "scary" it was how much Maclin had improved.
As far as his character is concerned, Maclin is supposedly one of the most genuine, down-to-earth people you could ever meet. Maclin comes from a well-reported background, one that only further endeared him to a fan base who needed no excuse to embrace him anyway. When Maclin cried at the press conference announcing his decision to turn pro, a part of all Missouri fans cried with him. He cited how much he loved the Missouri "family," and for that, the Missouri family will always love him.
The general consensus seems to be that his primary weakness is his route-running, in part because of the spread offense. I definitely want to do some more research on the subject. The good news about that problem (hopefully) is that I'd like to think route running is an easier issue to correct than general toughness or hands problems.
Why the 49ers should draft him
There are questions about his route-running, but as they say, you can't teach 4.29 speed. Although it might be a bit of a gamble, Maclin could be the game-breaking receiver the 49ers passed on in Desean Jackson last year. Maclin might be a touch slower than Jackson, but he more than makes up for it in size, at 6-1 200lbs. Furthermore, he'd give the 49ers a return man to replace Allen Rossum. The ability of a returner to change the momentum of a game is huge and is one reason I would be fine with the 49ers drafting him.
Why the 49ers should not draft him
The 49ers have bigger concerns to address with the 10th than wide receiver. If a guy like Michael Crabtree it would make sense to take him. However, Maclin might not be the complete receiver that Crabtree is. In college, a burner can take advantage of numerous mismatches. However, as one announcer said early in Desean Jackson's Philly career, "They all run 4.4 40s up here." The 49ers have enough talent to build on at wide receiver and shouldn't roll the dice with such a high pick.
After the jump, I've posted some YouTube highlight videos of Maclin.
Jeremy Maclin 2008 Preview
Redshirt year debut
Jeremy Maclin "Official" Highlight Reel
Jeremy Maclin Highlights
0 recs |
21 comments
|
Comments
please
don’t bring up DeSean Jackson anymore. I vomited in my mouth a little bit.
by save10 on Feb 13, 2009 8:33 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Desean Jackson
Maclin could be the game-breaking receiver the 49ers passed on in Desean Jackson last year
Whoa, it’s a little premature to start calling Desean Jackson a game-breaker. Yes his 62 receptions and 912 yards receiving are impressive for a rookie. However I don’t know any “game-breaker” that are only good for 2 TDs. Jackson did start the season out very strong for an extremely pass oriented offense who was missing Curtis, for most of the season, and had a relatively weak WR corp but he did finish the season pretty weak. Jackson might turn out to be a solid NFL WR but he’s not a “game-breaker” (yet).
by methodrampage on Feb 13, 2009 8:33 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
clarification
I guess it’s more in comparison to a lot of rookie wide receivers/kick returners. Rookie receivers take time to develop and maybe it was just appearances but it seemed like he made a lot of big plays for the Eagles (not just touchdowns). And I’m also factoring in his punt return TD, kick return TD and rushing TD.
by Fooch on Feb 13, 2009 9:11 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ok 5 TDs does not make a game breaker
Maybe I’m the only one but I’m highly skeptical of Desean. I think his production had more to do with a “perfect storm” scenario than him being an elite WR/game-breaker. I’m not losing any sleep over the Niners selection of Rachal over Jackson.
by methodrampage on Feb 13, 2009 9:46 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
selection
Perfect storm? How so?
5 TDs doesn’t make a game-breaker. What I"m just saying is that relative to most rookie WRs (Randy Moss aside), Jackson was an impact player (not quite the same as game-breaker). I’m just looking at things like having 5 games where he had a reception of 30+ yards, or a game where he busted out 20 yards on a big reverse.
Again, just that relative to what rookie receivers do he had a big impact in his rookie year. However, I too am quite happy having taken Chilo Rachal instead. I enjoy potentially locking in another position on the O-line for the next decade.
by Fooch on Feb 13, 2009 10:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What I’m getting at is basically that the opions of Jackson would surely be vastly different had he played for the Niners last year.
Philadelphia was the perfect destination for Jackson. Andy Reid loves to pass so any WR is going to get more than his fair chance to prove he can play. Besides Curtis’ the returning WR corp is pretty sad, I’d probably take Arnaz Battle over Reggie Brown, Greg Lewis, Hank Baskett and Jason Avant. Basically, Jackson was defaulted into being the Eagles’ #1 WR. But I like said, for a rookie, his season was impressive. I just have major concers over his decline once Curtis came back and his skills in the Red Zone. Frankly, I think he gets a little too much love around here.
by methodrampage on Feb 13, 2009 10:20 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
good point
He does, but given the proximity of Cal it’s not exactly surprising.
by Fooch on Feb 13, 2009 10:25 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I get that
I just don’t think taking Rachal over Jackson is the travesty that some make it out to be.
by methodrampage on Feb 13, 2009 10:55 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I also think that comparing him with Desean Jackson is dangerous.
I feel that too often teams are tempted by players that resemble players they passed on in the previous year’s draft (and turned out good) and forget that they are not the same player and need to be evaluated almost entirely separately.
by foosball4949 on Feb 13, 2009 11:33 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
Same way that teams fear picking a player similiar to one who has been a bust for thirt team (see Alex Smith and the Niners gunshyness with picking a QB). Not that I’m saying Sanchez should be the pick at #10 but Smith definitely serves as a deterrent.
by Brendan Scolari on Feb 13, 2009 10:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
WR
I’m with you on the assessment that there are bigger fish to fry than WR, and there should probably be some OT available at that point that would be safer picks. Heck, if you’re going to take a risk on a player, taking a chance on a DE/OLB prospect probably has a similar level of risk, except it actually fills a serious hole on defense.
Now I’m not saying take a DE/OLB just because the team needs one. I’m saying that I’m pretty sure there will be some DE/OLB prospect that rates about as highly as Maclin at #10. Heck, there will be some OTs rated just as highly, as well. If it came down to choosing between those two positions and Maclin, I would gladly take an OT or a DE/OLB.
On the other hand, if Crabtree were available, I’d find it difficult for McCloughan passes on him. He sounds like the kind of WR McCloughan covets.
by sfgfan on Feb 13, 2009 9:33 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
WR
Unless of course he signs Houshmanzadeh (not that he will). Wouldn’t that be just a fitting type of irony? You sign Housh and then Crabtree falls to you. I realize Crabtree is going to be an unproven rookie, but he’s just a beast. So I guess, if you had to choose between those two (Housh and Crabtree), which would you take, factoring in the whole college vs. experienced pro angle?
by Fooch on Feb 13, 2009 9:40 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Housh vs. Crabtree
Crabtree. Housh might provide more of an immediate impact but he’s on the wrong side of 30. I think Crabtree is all but a lock to develop into a solid NFL WR. He may not do it his first year but by his 2nd or 3rd all things point to him being pretty damn legit.
by methodrampage on Feb 13, 2009 9:51 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So I think about Crabtree and how he's supposedly established as this great receiver (and I think he is)
But clearly WR has been shown to be one of the riskier positions to use a first round pick on. For every Calvin Johnson, there’s a Charles Rogers
by foosball4949 on Feb 13, 2009 11:35 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You can say the same...
… about any position. A 50% success rate, as you propose, is actually pretty good.
by sfgfan on Feb 14, 2009 8:33 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What about
Housh and a first rounder or Crabtree and more cap room? I think I take Crabtree but its a tough choice.
by Brendan Scolari on Feb 13, 2009 10:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yes, but what about Maclin?
My take? I’m concerned about his route running and his toughness, but I’m listening. His return skills are what make him a really enticing option at #10. One thing that’s important to note is how well he follows his blockers when he’s in the open field (as you can see in the videos). With the faster players in the NFL, Maclin’s speed won’t be quite as effective when he’s split out wide (esp. with Hill at QB).
Personally I think DE and OT are significantly bigger needs, but there is the possibility of picking up an OT later in the draft (the top 4 OT’s aren’t the road-graders that a Jimmy Raye offense needs at RT), and if we could land Suggs, the rush OLB spot would be much less worrisome. Hopefully some clarity will be achieved as the free agency/draft process rolls along.
Throwback unis? Yes. Throwback afros? YES!
by grantmp on Feb 13, 2009 3:51 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Warning! This is Blasphemous
The way this guy moves so smothly, catches in stride while only reaching for ball in his final step, and the no non-sense way he runs straight up field for yardage, I am honestly reminded of Jerry Rice . . . and I’ve never seen nor felt that way about another receiver.
I’ve been told he has all the intangibles too. He was the heart the soul of that Mizzou team, tough, smart, dedicated, lead by example, played with heart and was admired by everyone in that program. I think his game is better suited for the pros and is going to be a great football player.
WR isn’t the most pressing need and we aren’t setup as a team to take full advantage of the passing game but this guy would be a great addition. I think Walsh would be all over this guy and he is going to be a perennial all pro. You can’t take a RT at #10, I’m not sold on any OLB/DE, no QBs worthy of top 10 pick nor safety’s and no pressing need to take ILB at CB this high so I think Maclin should be the guy.
by bignerd on Feb 14, 2009 2:23 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I dont see why we need a WR
either in the draft or from FA. To me, the crop we had last season performed well enough when we got going as a team under Shaun Hill. We have a good blend of youth and experience which should come on again next season given the opportunity. We took a WR in the draft last year in Josh Morgan in the 5th rnd if memory serves. Taking another WR in the draft this yr is not going to be a great confidence boost to him.
I would also resign Bryant Johnson this season to give him a chance to see what he c
can do.
With more pressing needs in many other areas of the field, WR should to me be one of the last areas we look at.
by Ninerfromacrossthepond on Feb 14, 2009 6:32 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 

























