Fullbacks: Not much of a long look back, brief look forward
This was not much of a year for the fullback position in the 49ers offense. In the Martz offense, the fullback is really not much of a factor, so it was not all that surprising to see Frank Gore's compatriot Moran Norris get the axe before the season. Given the relative lack of a traditional fullback in 2008, most of this discussion is going to center on options for 2009. If the move to a more meat and potatoes running-heavy game is what will happen, a strong fullback is in order.
Zak Keasey started out as the fullback, but suffered a season ending injury in October that came pretty lose to eliminating the fullback position from the lineup. Keasey doesn't fit the traditional mold of the smashing fullback as he's been more of a special teams guy throughout his career. He seemed to make some strides, but a torn bicep ended his season in mid-October. Keasey is an exclusive rights free agent, which means that if the 49ers tender him a contract, he has to sign it. If he chooses not to he has to sit out the season. I'd say that of all the potential certainties this offseason, Keasey being resigned is probably highest.
Michael Robinson filled the role off and on in 2008 but he is clearly not the answer at fullback. In 2009 I think the second biggest certainty is that he won't be the fullback. He will be used in some two-back formations, but not as the traditional lead-blocking fullback.
Sean Ryan was signed as a tight end, but fit into a bit of an H-back role that included some work as a fullback. At most he might get brought back for training camp, but barring injuries, his chances of making the squad (if he's even re-signed) are pretty slim.
As this list shows, it was a pretty quiet year for fullbacks. Since the offseason began, folks have definitely clamored for the need for a fullback.
Free Agency
A quick look at free agent targets over at WalterFootball.com indicates some very attractive options, if the 49ers decide to look in that direction. In a fitting irony, Moran Norris is back on the market and I'd imagine the 49ers might make a play for him. Frank Gore had his best year in 2006 running behind Norris and I'd imagine the cost would not be all that much. Of course, fullbacks in general aren't a high paid group, so that's not as much of an issue.
The hiring of Jimmy Raye makes Tony Richardson an intriguing option, even at the age of 37. Richardson was the fullback for Raye in Kansas City, although those rushing attacks were pretty much crap. More importantly (and more cherry picking on my part), Richardson was the fullback in New Jersey this year and Thomas Jones had the biggest year of his career. It might be a coincidence, but in my head I'll just say it's because of Richardson...ok maybe not. Over at Rotoworld yesterday, they posted some interesting commentary about Richardson. They mentioned that he intended to play two more years and the Jets have not contacted him about a new deal. In their commentary on it, Rotoworld said:
New 49ers OC Jimmy Raye and Richardson's history dates back to their days in Kansas City, so it's only natural that he'd consider following Raye to San Fran. Richardson, 37 has a lot of game left and could help Frank Gore.
Lorenzo Neal is also an intriguing option, given the help he provided Ladanian Tomlinson in past years. Leonard Weaver is great up in Seattle, but I'd expect the Seahawks to lock him up.
Draft
Although I personally would prefer a veteran option at fullback, there are some solid options in the draft. I would suspect the 49ers go with a veteran and continue developing Keasey, but maybe they go the youth route. Although not quite a consensus, the top five fullbacks in no particular order include:
1. Brannan Sutherland, Georgia
2. Tony Fiammetta, Syracuse
3. Quinn Johnson, LSU
4. Eric Kettani, Navy
5. Conredge Collins, Pittsburgh
It's still early, but some extended mock drafts have fullbacks around in the 5th round and later, so it's not something that has to be addressed early on. And of course shouldn't be addressed early on.
0 recs |
31 comments
|
Comments
What the *@#$?
Why is Moran Norris on this poll? He sign with Detroit!
Joe and Steve were under the same system for years... don't expect Smith to be super so soon.
by bayboy on Feb 3, 2009 9:44 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Ummm...
In a fitting irony, Moran Norris is back on the market and I’d imagine the 49ers might make a play for him. Frank Gore had his best year in 2006 running behind Norris and I’d imagine the cost would not be all that much.
And yeah, I voted for Norris. Bring the beast back. Stupid Nolan and Martz…
by Sebaz49 on Feb 3, 2009 10:20 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah I was sad to see Norris go, would be cool to have him back
Simply by pulling on both ends, Patrick Willis can stretch diamonds back into coal
by 49erLou on Feb 3, 2009 10:32 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I see..
I still don’t think they should bring him back… never thought he was a great fullback when carrying the ball. Plus he’s not that great of a catching fullback which is something Rathman was known for and I would suspect would expect.
Joe and Steve were under the same system for years... don't expect Smith to be super so soon.
by bayboy on Feb 3, 2009 2:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We need a FB not another RB
…never thought he was a great fullback when carrying the ball. Plus he’s not that great of a catching fullback…
Neither of those short comings stopped Lorenzo Neal from being a great FB.
by methodrampage on Feb 3, 2009 3:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think
he’s just bringing light to the fact that bringing in Tom Rathman to coach our backs might mean that we’re interested in a Rathman-like back for our system. Tony Richardson was Jimmy Raye’s prototype fullback, and he fits this mold…but Norris is a little more one-dimensional.
But yeah, ball-carrying and pass-catching are usually considered bonuses – blocking is typically a fullback’s priority.
by shlecko on Feb 3, 2009 3:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We actually do need another RB
But not necessarily a RFB.
by methodrampage on Feb 3, 2009 4:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Richardson's good
He also was the FB in Minnesota two years ago for Adrian Peterson’s amazing rookie season. I’d go for him in a heartbeat
by SammyG on Feb 3, 2009 9:50 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
I said awhile back
to get a Moran Norris.
I thought he was a free agent. If he’s available, great. As much as I like the blonde dreads hanging out behind Zak’s helmet the Niners need a bruiser at fullback. But any good vet that comes cheap is okay with me.
And also, as I’ve said before, sometimes playing VD as a kind of H-back where he occasionally gets a handoff, where he’s on the edge blocking like a tight end or as a lead blocker, is something that the Niners should consider. If you hand VD the ball he doesn’t have to reach up to catch it. And seeing him coming out of the backfield ahead of Frank Gore should bring tears to defensive backs. Hey, Matt Barrows agrees with me.
by Bob On The Coast on Feb 3, 2009 12:15 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Davis at H-Back.
While I agree that Davis would probably make a ridiculous H-Back (in terms of matchups), I think the reason the 49ers have been hesitant in the past is because of his blocking ability on the edge. By moving him inside, you instantly weaken your strong-side. This will especially be true if the 49ers let Bajema walk this year as many expect them to.
by sfgfan on Feb 3, 2009 12:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe.
Just the thought of him leading for Frank sends shivers through me.
There was talk over at Barrows’ blog that the reason VD doesn’t stretch out for balls is because he’s too muscle-bound. I figure if you hand the ball to him occasionally he’d make for an interesting runner too. Then again, he probably doesn’t have the instinct to find the holes.
by Bob On The Coast on Feb 3, 2009 6:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Too muscle bound?
Anybody over at Barrows’ blog no anything about anatomy? What muscles on VD are so big that he can’t extend his arms? I know body builders aren’t know to be flexible but that’s because most of there lifts are short range motions and unless somebody over there has seen VD lift or strech they’re more than likely talking out of their ass. Also, to me it looks more like a lack of willingness to sell out. It’s not like he’s leaving his feet and diving after balls and just not getting to them he’s just short arming the crap out of those passes.
by methodrampage on Feb 4, 2009 7:51 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah.
I completely agree that Davis is not willing to “sell out” for the ball. Based on what I’ve seen of his personality, he’s always looking for the next big play, rather than focusing on turning the current small play into a big one. A lack of focus (or desire) is more likely the culprit than inflexibility.
by sfgfan on Feb 4, 2009 10:02 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
whoa
I’d say that of all the potential certainties this offseason, Keasey being resigned is probably highest.
Wow, really?
I don’t think there’s any chance at all that Keasy comes back. To me, he fits into the same category as JTO – the only reason he made the roster was because he was cheap as hell and he fit into a Martz offense.
As an actual fullback, lead blocking and pass protecting, Zak Keasy was…to put it lightly…god-f#$&ing-awful.
I would think that in this new Singletary-Raye offense, the fullback would be a position of high priority. And with a Richardson being a long-time example, and Tom Rathman being the guy coaching these backs, I would think that our fullback would need to be someone who provides a legitimate threat as a pass-catcher. Leonard Weaver is a guy that would fit this mold a lot better than Moran Norris – who is a terrific straight-ahead blocker, but possesses very little playmaker ability.
Either way, if we are going to run an offense where fullback is that important, then I personally would like to see us open up the wallet to provide us with a decent option.
by shlecko on Feb 3, 2009 12:38 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Keasey
I think he’ll likely be resigned because of the exclusive rights issue. They merely need to tender him a contract (not sure of the dollar amount, but I believe it’s under $1M) and he has to sign it or sit out the year. If he was restricted or unrestricted I could see how they’d let him go, but given the ease of the contract, that’s why I assessed it as likely.
by Fooch on Feb 3, 2009 1:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Jeff Kuhn
He’d be good to have if the Pack do want to let him go. He’s a RFA this year so we’ll see.
Fans stuck in the 80's are lame. Respect the past, live in the now.
by maveric_87 on Feb 3, 2009 1:31 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Leonard Weaver
I think this guy can do three things:
Be a good blocker: Not only can he block but has the speed to stay with Gore to protect from would-be tacklers.
A good receiving fullback: We saw how much havoc he can create as a receiving fullback especially on the most important stat : YAC.
Lastly, weaken Seattle
I got never thought of him as a candidate until I read this which I feel is very helpful since we have similar needs: #1 WR, FB and OT
Joe and Steve were under the same system for years... don't expect Smith to be super so soon.
by bayboy on Feb 3, 2009 2:37 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Keasey's a great story and all
But he got destroyed in the 1st Cardinal’s game and he may be a solid all around FB, he’s not the run blocker we need.
If you had a lineup of 9 Jack Custs who hit(Cust career average) .239 AVG, .382 OBP, and .475 SLG, then your team would score 6.12 runs per game-totalling to 991runs a season.The 08 rangers lead the majors in runs score with 901.
by 9Custs on Feb 3, 2009 5:12 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Keasey didnt make it look easy
He didnt earn anything under the Martz offense and is not durable. Even on the cheap I’d hope they spend that mill on something productive. If its going to be smashmouth I dont see keasey as anything but an unsuited back up. i cant see McSing spending that dough on him. Like 9Custs says, great story and all but come on, bring back Moran the destroyer and blow some defenders up!
"Im coming from the land of the New Rising Sun"
Jimmy Hendrix
by Valy on Feb 3, 2009 7:10 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I voted for Richardson
But I’d love to have Moran back, he was great. I agree that he’s not very dynamic in the backfield but he and Gore work really well together.
if we have the roster space then I wouldn’t be sad to see Richardson and Norris but that may be a stretch.
Keasey was a bad FB but a special teams demon which is why he made the squad. Like Fooch, I expect they’ll tender him an offer and he’ll sign it and then either be FB #2 or get cut during/after training camp.
by foosball4949 on Feb 4, 2009 7:14 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Keasey
That last sentence is what I meant. I don’t expect him to become the #1 FB but I think it’s a simple signing that will happen.
by Fooch on Feb 4, 2009 8:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So the Niners are going to carry two FB?
I doubt that. Unless he’s a real valuable special teamer his roster spot is worth more than the ease of his contract.
by methodrampage on Feb 4, 2009 2:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree.
With guys like Michael Robinson, Jason Hill, and Manny Lawson playing really well on special teams, it’s highly unlikely the 49ers will use up a roster spot for someone who is “only” a special teams player and a backup fullback. This is especially true considering the VERY possible scenario that Keasey stays unemployed even if the 49ers cut him, as it has happened in the past. Keasey is kind of like their emergency FB on-demand.
by sfgfan on Feb 4, 2009 3:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
not to mention...
Keith Lewis and Jeff Ulbrich – special teams standouts that can actually play their positions well enough to be considered solid backups.
Keasy may be decent on special teams, but he’s downright awful as a fullback.
by shlecko on Feb 4, 2009 11:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I knew there were...
… AT LEAST two others, but I just couldn’t come up with the names. Yeah, the 49ers are pretty well stocked up on “special teams” players. You may even be able to throw Tully Banta-Cain into that list if he actually suits up for a game.
by sfgfan on Feb 5, 2009 9:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Just a thought
Since most of us believe Keasey isn’t the right fullback for a power running team, and since he won’t be horribly expensive next year, why not move him back to LB? Make him an ILB. I mean size wise he’s pretty much there, maybe needs to add a 5-10 pounds. He is a beast on special teams which I love about him.
I mean, at the TED spot we have Spikes and Ulbrich (Spikes recently turned 32 and Ulbrich will shortly). Now I love both as well. Spikes has been tearing it up and Ulbrich was solid for years and has been a stand up guy sticking to special teams and backup. But they are both getting up there, and most people will agree we need to find the future at TED.
Now, all I know is that Keasey played LB in college. I’m not sure what position nor in what scheme. But everyone likes him on special teams, and he could have a 1-2 year tryout at TED for relatively cheap to see if we need to draft someone or if he can play. Or maybe even be a dependable backup/special teams player.
by Sebaz49 on Feb 4, 2009 10:07 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Positional changes...
… are all fine and dandy, but it’s unlikely a player who isn’t practice squad eligible will get such consideration from a team.
by sfgfan on Feb 4, 2009 3:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
why not, you ask?
Because you can use a 7th round draft choice – or even find an undrafted rookie who can play LB better than Keasy and perform well on special teams, all while costing the team less money.
by shlecko on Feb 4, 2009 11:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't waste a draft pick on a FB
I think there will plenty of options after the draft and after the final roster cuts to find a capable fullback. There are some glaring holes that we need to fill first (safety, pass rusher, receiver, O-line), so we should use our draft picks wisely.
I think Keasey should definitely be resigned just for his special teams play. The 5 to 10 yards he saves in field position a couple of times a game are worth the roster spot he fills.
by Circus Act on Feb 4, 2009 10:33 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 





















