2009 NFL Free Agency: Kurt Warner's the new Michael Vick
Over the last two months, folks were floating rumors that the 49ers were interested in Michael Vick. It started when the 49ers were talking to Dan Reeves. There was some denial and it seemed to die down. Then the front office didn't exactly offer strong denials when asked about Vick at the fan event. That led to more rumors that they were interested. The 49ers offered a more firm denial and that seemed to kill the rumor once and for all.
Now we have the new rumor du jour (mmm, that sounds good, I'll have that - couldn't find the actual clip): Kurt Warner might be interested in coming to San Francisco. Barrows is really not buying it, while Maiocco seems a little less inclined to write it off completely. Now, Kurt Warner is actually scheduled to visit the 49ers on Monday. Of course, as Maiocco pointed out, "The fear among some individuals in the 49ers organization is that Warner might cancel his trip to the Bay Area and re-sign with the Cardinals on Sunday."
For me, if Warner re-signs with the Cardinals, it's really no big loss. I think the folks who have this "fear" are the ones who a) think the 49ers have a good shot at him if he comes to town and b) really, really want him. I think if Warner came to town, nothing would be guaranteed because I think he's truly conflicted on this. However, you know his agent has to love the leverage he's getting from the 49ers.
Either way, I'll be away from my computer most of the morning, so consider this an open thread for any Warner updates (and all other updates). I'm scheduling this post the night before, so if something happens after 7pm Saturday night it won't be in here.
A quick review of Saturday reviews a little of this and that. Obviously the Cassel trade to KC is big, particularly with the exposed rumors about Jay Cutler being shopped before the deal went down. Obviously he can't be too pleased about that. Who would you rather have heading into 2009, Jay Cutler or Matt Cassel? I'm a Cutler guy, but who knows.
The 49ers only news was locking down Brandon Jones for five years. I certainly hope he can step it up a notch, but I'll wait to pass judgment. Some folks definitely are not down with this signing and I can understand why. It's slightly underwhelming, but I'd like to think it might surprise us. Other than that they've got Demetric Evans coming to town Monday. Although I could be wrong, I'd imagine today will be relatively quiet. Right now it's mostly visits planned around the league. If anything does go down, feel free to post it in here. Once I get back online I'll make sure and post any updates.
0 recs |
17 comments
|
Comments
huh
the broncos trying to trade a young QB who has been to the Pro Bowl? Must be nice to be in such a situation.
by save10 on Mar 1, 2009 8:16 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Cutler Cutler Cutler Cutler Cutler
Seriously, the more I think about this, the more he needs to be looked at very, very seriously.
"I’m Joey Devine, I’m what Joba Chamberlain would be if he was good and nobody had ever heard of him."
by mikev on Mar 1, 2009 8:40 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
he
will never be on the 49ers because the 49ers cannot offer a QB in exchange unless part of some bizarre three player trade
by save10 on Mar 1, 2009 9:39 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The 49ers could offer Alex Smith in trade
works for me!
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
by Eastbayjim on Mar 1, 2009 10:25 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
Are you guys forgetting who the defensive co-ordinator is in Denver? McDaniels would probably take whatever advice Nolan has on Smith, and I doubt Nolan is talking about daisies and butterflies when regarding Alex Smith.
by Andrew Davidson on Mar 1, 2009 10:29 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Tough
I would have welcomed Warner to SF with open arms when we brought in Martz last year but now I’m not to sure we should go for him. The one thing that really turns me off is that he’s looking for 14-16 million. For a squad that is going to be a “running team,” I don’t see how we can pay that much for a passing QB. Having said all that, I think we would be a shoo in for the playoffs with him here.
by baybruin415 on Mar 1, 2009 9:49 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
what about?
tra thomas or runyan from the eagles as our RT? I know they’re old but so was allen right?
If you had a lineup of 9 Jack Custs who hit(Cust career average) .239 AVG, .382 OBP, and .475 SLG, then your team would score 6.12 runs per game-totalling to 991runs a season.The 08 rangers lead the majors in runs score with 901.
by 9Custs on Mar 1, 2009 10:40 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
i think runyan was resigned
MURS for President!!!!!!!
by jtoj on Mar 1, 2009 10:50 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What other 3rd team options are there?
Off the top of my head…..Miami (Pennington), Tennessee (Young), Cleveland (Anderson)…obviously, these won’t actually happen…but it’s March 1, I feel like speculating
by YoungWillis on Mar 1, 2009 10:41 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
This would make no sense
There is something else going on here. Why would we sign an old pass happy quarterback to a ton of money when we have Raye and Singletary with their run run run offensive approach. Don’t get me wrong Warner has still got gas left in the tank but how would he fit into our offensive scheme and would/could his contract be justified in this type of offense?? I don’t think so! And as successful as he was this year, he wouldn’t be throwing to Fitz and Boldin. Our receivers have potential but they aren’t in the same class asthose receivers. There has to be some other motivation in bringing Warner in. Do they want to force the Cardinals to use more cap space on Warner because they are interested in signing another free agent the Cardinals are interested in and Warner signing a bigger contract would drop the Cardinals out of the running?
by 49er4life on Mar 1, 2009 11:37 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Jones
Where does he fit in? Was he brought in to strectch the field and open up the running game? Cause although he says he’s faster I never envisioned him as a speed threat who gets behind coverage. Maybe he can be but why a five year deal and why not give that money to someone who has proven speed like Devry Henderson? Or maybe it’s possible that they think Bruce is leaning towards retirement and Jones will replace him to be an immediate starter and line up opposite Morgan as Hill and Zeigler aren’t ready to start yet and Battle isn’t starting material.
by 49er4life on Mar 1, 2009 11:45 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Speed Threat
I think people forget how fast Jason Hill is. I think they too forget how good Josh Morgan is at tracking down the deep ball.
Devery Henderson is fast and runs a good streak route, but that’s about it. And his hands aren’t exactly made of glue. We could still afford to add Devery on top of Jones, because we could probably get him for a two year, $5 million deal. He’s not going to command much interest on the market.
Remember the team does want to take it slow, and they don’t want to overpay. Its probably why we haven’t heard much about visits set up, they don’t want to drive up a player’s price.
by Andrew Davidson on Mar 1, 2009 12:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Cutler update
This was up in a FanPost by bignerd, but I think it’s better for now in here and the Cutler thread:
Apparently the fall out on this trade has just begun. Not only does it appear Denver was indeed shopping Cuttler to aquire Cassel but the Patriots took the lesser deal. The writers at ESPN seemed somewhat appalled that the Patriots accepted the Chiefs 2nd round pick over the Broncos 1st round pick (12th overall in the draft).
I’ll let the article discuss more of the drama. I wonder if the league office is going to look into this, because it seems a little out bounds to how the league usually operates.
by Fooch on Mar 1, 2009 2:37 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
According to PFT, there wa a report that the Bucs/Broncos approached New England after an agreement was reached with KC. In other words, they were too late.
by Andrew Davidson on Mar 1, 2009 2:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
10th Pick
Who would be willing to part with the 10th pick for Jay Cutler? If the Broncos are high on Mark Sanchez I could possibly see this deal going down. Would the 10th pick be enough or would we have to include other pieces to pull off a Cutler deal?
PT-42
by norcaldevilasu on Mar 1, 2009 8:23 PM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 





















