2009 NFL Draft: Safe Bets
Last week I examined some of the most likely bust candidates in the the 2009 NFL Draft. This week I'd liketo the look at the half-full glass of prospects. When it come to the NFL Draft, most of these young men have the talent to be as good as they want to be. When I think of a guy like Rashaun Woods--it hurts. I thought this guy was can't miss. He had no weakness in his game. But alas, he'd rather be fishing. The following is a few players that should not go the way of Rashaun Woods. And if they do, hopefully it's with the Rams or Cowboys. There were two OTs in the bust list last week. So, we'll start with two safer options at the position.
Jason Smith, OT, Baylor: Smith is a former tight end, and like our own Joe Staley, has become a massive man while maintaining his athleticism. He has a mean streak and by all accounts a great work ethic. Smith is probably the best player to come out of Baylor since Mike Singletary. With his mix of talent and drive, there is no reason Jason Smith shouldn't be a mainstay on the left side for whoever drafts him.
Eugene Monroe, OT, Virginia: In the 2008 draft, Branden Albert was among the best offensive line prospects. Albert was a first round pick, even as a guard he was chosen 15th overall by the Chiefs. The reason he was a guard? Because they had Eugene Monroe at left tackle. In my opion, Monroe is a better prospect than fellow Cavalier D'brickashaw Ferguson, who the Jets drafted #4 overall in 2006. Some players have a high ceiling, as does Monroe. He also has a high floor.
Aaron Curry, LB, Wake Forest: Curry is a rare prospect. He's the type where his scouting report just doesn't include a section titled "weaknesses". Curry got better every year at Wake Forest. His production is off the charts. Curry is described as a hard working team leader by his coaches. He got better every year and so did his numbers. At the combine, Curry threw down some silly numbers including a 4.56 40 yard dash. The Detroit Lions have a chance to draft the best player in the draft with the #1 pick in 2009. Curry is that man. Will they make the right choice?
Malcom Jenkins, CB, Ohio State: Some people are down on Malcolm Jenkins after running a 4.55 in Indianapolis. I'm not one of them. The great thing about a prospect like Jenkins is even if he falters at CB and the questions about his speed are warranted, he still has the ability to be a All-Pro safety. So, for all you poker players out there, he has an "out". If Penn State is "Linebacker U" then Ohio State is "DBU". Ohio State has produced a bevy of NFL defensive backs, like Shawn Springs, Antoine Winfield, Donte Whitner, our own Nate Clements and who can forget Ahmed Plummer? Jenkins is next in line and hopefully is closer to Clements than Plummer. Did I mention he's a hard worker? I think I sense a trend...
Brian Robiske, WR, Ohio State: Robiske is just rock solid as you would expect a son of an NFL WR coach to be. He has good size, speed, strength, ball skills and runs crisp routes. Robiske may not be a flashy high upside prospect, but he is among the safest bets in the the draft to have a long career as a possesion WR.
Hakeem Nicks, WR, North Carolina: Nicks is one of my favorite prospects in the draft. Not only is he a safe bet at wide receiver, but he also has some upside. At the combine, Nicks answered any questions about his deep speed by throwing down a 4.50 in the 40. Nicks' calling card has always been his pure hands and strong runs after the catch. Nicks profiles as a #2 WR, but there are shades of guys like Anquan Boldin and Chad Johnson in his game. If Michael Crabtree is worth a top 10 selection with a similar skillset, then Nicks is a steal at the top of round 2.
How about it? Who are your safe bets in 2009?
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think you pretty much hit this nail on the head
I agree with everyone on here except Jenkins and Curry. And I’d also say Rey Rey is a pretty safe bet.
Wanna hear some music?
Curry
I think he’s a very safe bet… he was a beast in some of the games I watched him in and he scored pretty high marks at the combine. But I agree with Jenkins, I see him more of a Mike RUmph type player… we don’t want that disaster again.
Joe and Steve were under the same system for years... don't expect Smith to be super so soon.
Rumph
A difference I see in Rumph and Jenkins, though, is the Rumph played in one of the best college secondaries in recent memory, didn’t he?
From what I understand, Jenkins is a smart player who plays the position well (even though, apparently, he doesn’t have the speed that many covet). As briandean says, if he fails at corner, he could probably make for a pretty good FS.
Agree on Rey
he is gonna be a star.
I am a huge believer in production over combine.
It was "mascot night" at the Rose Garden, which apparently translates to a dozen inflatable versions of various NBA mascots being chased around the arena by Portland's "Blaze", which is some breed of rapist dog. -PostingandToasting
by GreatOden'sRaven on Mar 11, 2009 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm still iffy on Jenkins, but not because of speed
I’ve heard he’s just not that fluid and that the upgrade in competition in the NFL will give him fits. I haven’t watched much of him so I don’t know if its true.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, Nicks will come out of this as one of the best players this draft produces and I would rather have him than Crabtree. I’m sure I’m gonna get blasted by people on this but I would more than happily see him taken at 10 if I didn’t think we could trade down for him. His stock will only rise higher after his Pro Day.
I dont really like his game that much
one hit wonders and all that..
just me tho
It was "mascot night" at the Rose Garden, which apparently translates to a dozen inflatable versions of various NBA mascots being chased around the arena by Portland's "Blaze", which is some breed of rapist dog. -PostingandToasting
by GreatOden'sRaven on Mar 11, 2009 1:42 PM PDT up reply actions
Enough with the WR talk (unless it's in the later rounds)
We have a lot of young, talented WRs and we don’t have a guy to pass it to him and we’re not set at the OL to protect the QB or his ability to have enough time to throw it up…
WR is a sexy position. The 49ers have a tremendous history of great WRs, including Jerry Rice, John Taylor, TO [on skill/production alone, I hate him, too]. We want another shiny toy whose jersey we can wear. I get it. But this is not the year. We need a year to figure out how good our existing young guys are. They could turn out to be really good (I’m looking at you, Josh Morgan). We need at least a year to figure out what we have at QB. We need at least part of a year to see what we have (or will have) from our OL.
You don’t buy the cherry for the top of the ice cream sundae until you’ve made the ice cream sundae and it’s near completion.
Need vs BPA
As has been the standard argument around here, the 49ers aren’t in a position to where they can draft purely for need. If a WR happens to be the best player available when they pick (which is possible if Crabtree falls to #10 or a guy like Nicks continues to shoot up the charts but falls to the 49ers at their second round pick), they would have to at least take a serious look at that player. The only position, I think, they can’t draft is a MIKE ILB.
could be MIKE/TED
I think Rey Rey would project as a MIKE to most teams—at least they would try him there to start, but he could be better suited as a TED especially on the niners. I know we have gotten into this on other threads and we don’t need to start again. I think the consensus was that he isn’t #10 value. Anyway, I guess I’m just being annoying…
PS—I’m working on the capitalization sfgfan!
by gogoldenbears on Mar 10, 2009 8:16 PM PDT up reply actions
Easier to read.
And the correct (looking) capitalization made the comment a lot easier to read. :)
Another OSU NFL DB: the Panthers Chris Gamble
No PB’s yet be he’s a good one none the less
I blog the Carolina Panthers at www.catscratchreader.com

by 

























