Niners Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Follow the @sbnation NHL Twitter List

49ers Draft Needs Revisited

49ersdraft_mediumDo you remember when one of your buddies would hold three fingers up, like this, and say, "Read between the lines..."? That's what I feel like the 49ers are doing to me this offseason. It's hard to grasp exactly what McSing is up to. They've been interested in a lot of free agents, at a number of positions, but only landed a couple of reserves. I never really considered DE much of a draft need in the first place, so the addition of Demetric Evans just solidified that. Brandon Jones is more of a #3, like Jason Hill, so finding another talented starting WR is still a need.

So, I'll try now to read between the lines.

1. Offensive Tackle:  Upgrading the RT position seems to be priority number one. There has been some contradicting information this week, though. After Andre Smith's debacle of an offseason, his stock is all over the place. Most people seem to think he'll be available at #10. Matt Maiocco seems to think that 49ers scouts were impressed at Smith's Pro Day workout and would pull the trigger if he were available--man-boobs and all. Maiocco drops this little nugget on Sunday...

--Steelers free-agent tackle Marvel Smith received a contract offer from the 49ers on Friday. Obviously, it did not bowl him over. There is a strong chance Smith will continue to weigh his options for a while.

The physical must have gone well. It would be hard to believe OT could be the selection at #10 if Marvel Smith agrees to terms.

2. Outside Linebacker: I would have ranked the need for a pass rusher ahead of OT even though most don't see it that way. So, if the Marvel Smith deal gets done I will be crossing my fingers for Everette Brown or Brian Orakpo at #10. I'm still very afraid of Aaron Maybin, even though he apparently had a great showing at Penn State's Pro Day (so good people are whispering the S-word). There is enough depth that a nice player could be had at pick #43 if the right guy falls to #10 at another position. Everette Brown is still my guy as he is the best pure pass rusher and is more likely to be available due to his size (6-2, 256) counting him out for traditional 4-3 defenses.

3. Wide Reciever: Where's the potential #1 target? Josh Morgan was a nice surprise, but let's be real, we're talking about a guy with ONE career start. The only guy that makes sense with the 10th pick is Crabtree. There could be a nice player in round 2, however. Such as, Hakeem Nicks or Kenny Britt. And I'm glad to see the Ramses Barden bandwagon gaining steam.

4. Running Back: I am not on the Thomas Clayton bandwagon. In fact, I don't really get the facsination with this guy. He's just not that good. From everything the 49ers are saying, they agree with me. McCloughan has made it clear he will draft a #2 to go behind Frank Gore. I'm not sold that it needs to be a "big" back necessarily, but that seems to be what they're looking for, even though McCloughan leaves a ray of hope for a more explosive type runner in a 49ers.com Q and A:

I do not want to comment on another team’s player, but an individual who has the same skill set as Sproles has value not as just a running back, but a returner, receiver and running back. If we were able to find a guy with similar skills, we would definitely entertain that option. The "big back" would be someone who, if Frank were to get hurt, could come in and carry the load for two, four or six weeks. I don’t see a smaller back being that type of guy. We’re going to be a good team this year because we’re able to establish the run and come downhill between the tackles. With a smaller back, that is tough to do, especially for a longer period of time. We always look for good football players and that’s what we’ll continue to do, but you have to understand that this is a big man’s game. The big backs are going to survive in this league.

5. Cornerback: CB is the darkhorse position. Everyone is still talking about safety, but the team has made it clear, they're filling that need from within. And with the recent visits of veteran CBs, the 49ers are tipping their hand. Matt Barrows has finally written what I've been waiting to see--Reggie Smith is now a safety. Watch out for Darius Butler from Connecticut, if he's still there at #43.

6. Quarterback: If the 49ers were interested in Kurt Warner, then you know they're interested in upgrading the position, which they should be. It would surprise me, though, to see a QB selected in the first round, but it's not impossible. If we start to hear lots of talk about QB coming from the front office, you gotta believe it's a smokescreen to increase trade value of the pick. If they do go QB, we probably won't hear a peep.

 

Poll
If you absolutely HAD to draft a QB, who would it be?
Matthew Stafford
388 votes
Mark Sanchez
460 votes
Josh Freeman
121 votes
Pat White
181 votes
Rhett Bomar
61 votes
Nate Davis
61 votes
Other (Please Specify)
31 votes

1303 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 63 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

no NT?

i would but NT at #2 or #3 need. every 3-4 team needs a good NT and we have 2 at best mediocre NT’s. it needs to be addressed in the draft and i think coach knows that.

by remembering9ergods on Mar 23, 2009 8:27 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I think...

… NT would be a #3. The rankings are subjective, so it really depends on what briandean thinks of the Sopoaga experiment at NT. A lot of people think Sopoaga can play NT. I’m a little more skeptical, as he’s been on the team all this time and they’ve said (including McCloughan) all along that he’s best suited at LDE.

by sfgfan on Mar 23, 2009 9:04 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This

I should have added a line about NT. But sfgfan pretty much summed it up. McCloughan has touched on the lack of D-line talent in the draft. And along with moving Sopoaga back to NT, where he belongs, while adding Evans at end…the ’09 D-line is done.

Either than or McCloughan is blowing a hell of a smokescreen with all of this and drafts either of the Boston College tackles, who are the only potential starting caliber NTs available. I’m not as fond of Raji at #10 as most.

by briandean on Mar 23, 2009 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Raji

Just want to clarify, I think he’ll probably be gone by the time we pick anyway. Raji fits in any scheme. But I wish I would have gotten to see the Senior Bowl practices, because that’s where most of his hype came from. IN the Senior Bowl game, he didn’t dominate anyone. When watching Boston College he was very good, but not crazy good…top 10 lock good.

by briandean on Mar 23, 2009 12:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

thank you

I feel the same way and am very wary of Raji. My sense from watching game film is that he doesn’t always show up in games. I wonder if he’ll pull an Alan Branch…

by foosball4949 on Mar 24, 2009 9:15 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

NT

It might be hard to draft a NT, without reaching, this year as you’ve got the Cheifs, Browns, and Packers (who all employ a 3-4 scheme) picking in front of the Niners. Then you’ve got the Broncos picking just behind the Niners so it’s possible they could trade up with someone like the Jaguars or Radiers and jump in front of the Niners. All of these guys will be looking for at NT.

Don't sweat it. I'm illiterate.

by methodrampage on Mar 23, 2009 9:06 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I see what you're saying....

… and the same teams pick in front of the 49ers in the second, too. Just curious, though, what do you think of Ron Brace, Raji’s wingman?

by sfgfan on Mar 23, 2009 9:30 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Brace

That who I was thinking about when I threw the Broncos as a team who might trade up, in the 2nd. He could be worth a 2nd round pick but he’d still have to get thru a bunch of 3-4 teams.

Don't sweat it. I'm illiterate.

by methodrampage on Mar 23, 2009 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Leapfrog

Do you think Brace would be worth the 49ers trading up leapfrogging the top of the second as they have in previous drafts?

by sfgfan on Mar 23, 2009 11:38 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Now we're talking

What would it be like, a 2nd and a 4th to get, say, Detriot’s 2nd? Could be an idea worth entertaining.

Don't sweat it. I'm illiterate.

by methodrampage on Mar 23, 2009 11:42 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe a little more than that.

According to this, it looks like a 2nd, 3rd for Detriot’s 2nd and 4th. I don’t know how accurate the values are in that table or how old they are, though.

I’d definitely make either trade, if they were available.

by sfgfan on Mar 23, 2009 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not sold

Still interested, though. I’ve heard that BC ran a 1-gap style and that Raji was the guy who saw double-teams, not Brace. I’m also loathe to give up the draft picks generally, despite the fact that Brace is an intriguing prospect. It just doesn’t make sense to spend that much a) on a position that other teams have addressed later in the draft and b) when most will agree that OT and pass-rushing OLB are our top 2 needs.
What it seems to me that people are forgetting here is that most draft sites project like 45 people to go in the 1st round, and further, that many teams will reach for a prospect they’re enamored with, meaning that there are always people who are available half a round later than they were expected to be.

Throwback unis? Yes. Throwback afros? YES!

by grantmp on Mar 23, 2009 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The OL gave up more sacks that any other team in 2008 so OT needs to be a top priority

"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"

by Eastbayjim on Mar 23, 2009 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stop talking about sacks

They’re already going to go down with JTO and Martz gone.

Don't sweat it. I'm illiterate.

by methodrampage on Mar 23, 2009 12:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

True, they should, and also we should get more sacks on Defense by running the 3/4 and not the hybrid

"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"

by Eastbayjim on Mar 23, 2009 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Defensively

I don’t think it’s safe to assume that just simplifying the defense will produce more sacks. The 49ers just flat out lack consistent talent on the outside.

by sfgfan on Mar 23, 2009 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As someone pointed out previously...

… you can pretty much throw Hostler’s line out the window because he was just a terrible coordinator. No one in that offensive unit played very well, and it’s all intermingled together.

In 2006, with Norv here (arguably the most competent OC the 49ers have had in recent years) limited the sack number to 35. That’s with a line of Jennings, Allen/Snyder, Heitmann, Smiley, and Harris as the starting five. From what the unit was able to put together toward the end of last season, I’d imagine that this year’s line of Staley, Baas/Snyder, Heitmann, Rachal, Snyder/FA/Rookie isn’t THAT far off, and probably better than most of last year.

Of course, this is all assuming Raye follows through with the run-first mentality and Hill/Smith continue what Hill was doing at the end of last season with making quick decisions.

by sfgfan on Mar 23, 2009 3:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

examples (since I know these are necessary)

Jamaal Williams (supplemental draft round 2)
Shaun Rogers (late round 2)
Gilbert Brown (mid round 3)
Pat Williams (undrafted)

Throwback unis? Yes. Throwback afros? YES!

by grantmp on Mar 23, 2009 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So what?

Vince Wilfork was a first round pick. Just because things have happened in the past doesn’t mean they’re going to happen again. No come up with a list of all of the guys who were taken in similar spots that have failed.

Don't sweat it. I'm illiterate.

by methodrampage on Mar 23, 2009 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Examples

I realize that there are many others who could’ve been cited (Ngata, Haynesworth, Kevin Williams, John Henderson) in favor of the argument that you should draft a NT in the 1st . I’m just saying its possible to get one later, and that, given the other needs we have and the available talent, we should look elsewhere. I don’t think the one guy available at DT in the top 10 (Raji) is NT material, since he seems more like a penetrator type.
Is this not a damned if you do (give examples), damned if you don’t situation?

Throwback unis? Yes. Throwback afros? YES!

by grantmp on Mar 23, 2009 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Examples

Maybe it’s just me but it’s seems to be common knowledge that standout players at any position can be had throughout the draft. It’s just harder determine who they guys are as the draft goes on. It’s possible the next Tom Brady is out there this year but I don’t see any teams waiting around to draft a bunch of 7th round QBs.

Don't sweat it. I'm illiterate.

by methodrampage on Mar 23, 2009 3:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Brace

Brace has had some injury problems too. He’s not as valuable to the 4-3 teams. I think Brace’s value is right in line with the 49ers 3rd rounder. I wouldn’t take him in the 2nd. It wouldn’t be the hugest reach, but there will be better talent available.

by briandean on Mar 23, 2009 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Throwback unis? Yes. Throwback afros? YES!

by grantmp on Mar 23, 2009 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What's With Lack of Aggressiveness?!

I am with you on the lack of FA signings. They have cap room, there is talent available to fill key needs, and they want to win. Sign Marvel, so tat they really can spend #10 and #43 on the BPA at numbers 2, 4 and 5! What is with the hesitation – lets get on with it!

by LT9er on Mar 23, 2009 8:47 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

M.Smith

They probably offered him a deal that’s slightly more lucrative than the one Barry Sims got last season, and maybe with more incentives. Apparently M.Smith probably thinks he’s worth more, so naturally, he’s going to shop around a bit. It takes two to tango, remember?

by sfgfan on Mar 23, 2009 9:05 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

at

this point it doesnt matter who they go with – OT, LB or NT. with the 1st and 2nd round picks they have to get guys that will start and make an impact. If not Patrick Willis impact, then at least Joe Staley impact. This team isnt good enough have projects in high rounds

by save10 on Mar 23, 2009 10:42 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

How do you get good?

By drafting low risk-low upside guys?

Don't sweat it. I'm illiterate.

by methodrampage on Mar 23, 2009 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

indeed

This is why it might make sense to draft a guy like Maybin with the #10 pick. I’m not saying we should, but both Kiper and McShay rate him higher than Brown and pretty well level with Orakpo despite the fact that Orakpo is so decorated and a Senior and everything. The word is upside. Maybin had an outrageous pro day and that only backs up what people have seen on film. Sometimes it makes more sense to roll the dice with a guy who has the chance to be great.

Throwback unis? Yes. Throwback afros? YES!

by grantmp on Mar 23, 2009 11:51 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stafford, like Cutler in college, likes the challenge of throwing the ball in double coverage. Using velocity and accuracy to his advantage.

Sanchez, like Tony Romo, is surrounded by a cast of talented players, has happy feet, and has fallen in love with the deep ball, rarely ever taking what the defense gives him

http://www.49ersboard.blogspot.com

by supraman on Mar 23, 2009 10:46 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I think OT is the highest need. We really don't have a starting RT now and without one our offense will suck big time.

Andre Smith would be a great RT or LT but he has the size, quickness and temperment to go along with Rachal’s RG for running plays.

NT is not a big concern right now as I think OLB / rusher, WR and RB are our other top needs. I have also read on other sites about Raji that he is more of a 4/3 tackle not a true 3/4 NT and that Ron Brace would be a better fit. Sorry.. i don’t have links.

"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"

by Eastbayjim on Mar 23, 2009 11:27 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

OLB vs NT

Feasibility aside (i.e. other 3-4 teams taking NTs before the 49ers), are you really more comfortable with Franklin/Sopoaga at NT than you are with Lawson/Haralson at OLB?

I understand the lack of a pass rush should make OLB a huge priority (and I believe it is). I do, however, think that an NT will not only help the 49ers anchor the middle but he could also improve the pass rush by allowing the DEs to work further out, thus potentially freeing up the OLBs a little more.

by sfgfan on Mar 23, 2009 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I totally understand where you are coming from.

But I also think that for 2009 Franklin/Sopoaga will be ok at NT and even Lawson/Haralson at OLB will do at OLB if we can’t get a positive upgrade. The biggest needs are OT as without a top RT we won’t have that good of an offense. Also RB as we need someone who can work with Gore and also replace him for a couple games if need be. Right now NT in the 1st would be a luxury but watch the 9ers draft Raji and get a RT in the 2nd or 3rd.

I also see Lawson doing much better now that he is heavier and also a year away from the ACL injury. Haralson only started half the games and had something like 8 sacks.. so give him a starting job and he could be up there at 15/16 sacks. Also measure in that they are going to be a solid 3/4 this year and not the 3/4 – 4/3 that Nolan was using. The were ranked like 13 in defense in the second half of the season.

What I would really like is to trade down and get multiple picks in the 1st and second round and get a RT, OLB, NT and RB and then the rest for QB, CB WR.

"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"

by Eastbayjim on Mar 23, 2009 12:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

My opinion.

If Andre Smith’s stock drops, the 49ers should avoid him. Let the other teams take him and that will allow other OT’s to slide down to the 2nd round. With that said, take a DE/OLB with the 10th overall pick. In the 2nd round, there will be OT’s available (hopefully): Eben Britton of AU, William Beatty of UConn, Jason Meredith of South Carolina. If they do take an OT in the 1st round and go NT in the 2nd, Ron Brace hopefully will still be there. If not, Evander Hood of Mizzou, Sen’Derrick Marks of Auburn, or Fili Moala of Southern Cal. It would be nice to see the 49ers go this route: OLB/DE(1st), NT(2nd), RB(3rd). In the poll, I voted for other, Graham Harrell of Texas Tech. He will be available in the 2nd day.

"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Mar 23, 2009 11:50 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

"this route"

So if that’s the plan, is Singletary himself going to fill in at RT? At what point does BPA take hold?

Throwback unis? Yes. Throwback afros? YES!

by grantmp on Mar 23, 2009 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

RT is our biggest need as even with Smith signing we don't have a solid RT. All other positions are at least covered somewhat.

I think RT in the 1st or 2nd and then everything else will fall into place.

"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"

by Eastbayjim on Mar 23, 2009 12:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you're scared of Smith just get Oher

Michael Oher will be available and he rounds out the top tier of OTs (Smith, Monroe, Smith and Oher)

by Neon on Mar 23, 2009 12:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Top two tiers, maybe

J. Smith and Monroe and is their own tier. Oher and A. Smith are in a lower tier.

Don't sweat it. I'm illiterate.

by methodrampage on Mar 23, 2009 1:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry I was not referring to Andre Smith but Marvel Smith

"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"

by Eastbayjim on Mar 23, 2009 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

grantmp...

My friend, enough with the sarcasm, alright?

"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Mar 23, 2009 11:59 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

lol

The second question was a serious one, though.

Throwback unis? Yes. Throwback afros? YES!

by grantmp on Mar 23, 2009 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

BPA...

there will be plenty left with the 49ers draft slots. One of those OT’s I mentioned will be available in the 2nd, RB’s will also be available; Cedric Peerman of UV, Ian Johnson of Boise State, James Davis of Clemson, Andre Brown of NC State, Javon Ringer of MSU, are just some of many. In the DT position, after Raji, Jerry, Brace, Hood, Marks and Moala, the next top DT’s are Alex Magee of Purdue, Dorrell Scott of Clemson, Ricky Jean-Francois of LSU, Terrance Taylor of Michigan, among others. Some particulars to look out for: Chris Baker of Hampton, Once a PSU player and Roy Miller of Texas, who had 2 sacks when Orakpo was out.

"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Mar 23, 2009 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Andre Brown, Cedric Peerman

Thanks, man—that’s much more than I was asking for. I’m particularly intrigued by Peerman and Brown after reading this article on Speed Score, which is a better predictor of NFL success than the straight 40 time.
http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stat-analysis/2009/speed-score-2009
It’s not a particularly subtle measure (doesn’t account for vision, lateral quickness, etc.), but it is more informative.

Throwback unis? Yes. Throwback afros? YES!

by grantmp on Mar 23, 2009 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The two you mentioned...

could be steals of the draft in their positions.

"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"

by Jeff_Fuller_49 on Mar 23, 2009 7:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Stafford would be my pick

if he’s available at #10, which is unlikely.

by Brendan Scolari on Mar 23, 2009 12:05 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Not so sure about Crabtree

Coming off an injury, no stop watch on him, measured shorter than promised and comes from an offensive system that only ran 30 plays. The guy has a lot to overcome if you expect him to contribute to a football team his rookie year.

by bignerd on Mar 23, 2009 1:13 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

News flash.

Most WRs don’t make significant contributions in their first year, and maybe even their second.

by sfgfan on Mar 23, 2009 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Then what about Hill and Morgan?

Hill is entering into his 3rd and Morgan ,his 2nd.Season. They haven’t shown what they could do. And how do you feel about Zegilar ?

by LASVEGASNINER on Mar 23, 2009 7:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You don't...

… pass up on a WR many had going in the top 5 just because you have a couple of second day picks that MIGHT produce. It’s always good to have an abundance of WRs, just ask Arizona.

by sfgfan on Mar 24, 2009 8:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

the draft will sort itself out later.

What I’m asking is the group we have now,is it good enough ?

by LASVEGASNINER on Mar 24, 2009 9:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Unless you have...

… at least one WR that is something like Fitz, Boldin, C.Johnson, etc, a WR group can always use another WR.

Basically, I answered that question in my comment: you can’t have too many good WRs. Morgan and Hill are the two “second day picks that MIGHT produce” I was referring to in the comment. They show promise, but aren’t a sure thing. You don’t pass up on a talented WR in the draft if you don’t have any sure talent on your roster (or any previous first round picks still trying to pan out).

by sfgfan on Mar 24, 2009 10:28 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd pick Maclin over Crabtree at this point

The guys still has a ton of negative’s in his column. Doesn’t have great NFL size, NFL speed . . . no one knows. Like I said, Texas Tech runs around 30 total plays which doesn’t prepare him well for the culture shock that is the NFL. He is getting a bump in value because Tech had a such a great year but I just don’t see the NFL translation to back the hype? Beside his skill set, he’s going to start out his first year injured, most likely playing catch up. He will probably take some heat for it and who knows if he has the character to pull himself above it.

You scream Crabtree . . . I cringe and think Peter Warrick or Desmond Howard.

by bignerd on Mar 23, 2009 10:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not sure where you got that one. Maclin has speed to get downfield. Peter Warrick couldn’t get out of the slot.

by bignerd on Mar 24, 2009 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Man-Boobs

I Fixed the link to the Andre Smith video…

by briandean on Mar 23, 2009 1:47 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

even if

smith winds up being an All-Pro, no matter what team he is on his nickname is gonna be Moobs or something like that

by save10 on Mar 23, 2009 4:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow

A surprising number of people like Mark Sanchez. He’s currently leading the poll (over 1000 votes) at 34%.

by briandean on Mar 24, 2009 1:44 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

that is remarkable

I have heard about 0 draft buzz for Sanchez for #1, and a ton for Stafford. I think people are more enamored with Sanchez because people hear that he’s more of a West Coast Offense kind of guy, and we’re…well…on the West Coast. If the bust factor is high with Stafford, it’s even higher with Sanchez.

Throwback unis? Yes. Throwback afros? YES!

by grantmp on Mar 24, 2009 5:11 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Because Stafford is more NFL ready

While it’s believed Sanchez has more upside but is a little rougher around the edges. Detriot needs a QB sooner rather than later which is why it’s assumed they prefer Stafford.

Don't sweat it. I'm illiterate.

by methodrampage on Mar 24, 2009 7:25 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think...

… it has to do with the perceived need of a QB for the 49ers.

I think most will agree that Hill (or Smith, if he somehow beats out Hill) are AT THE VERY LEAST, okay stopgap solutions for QB. Each are under contract for two years, which would allow any QB the 49ers draft two years to get ready.

I also think most will agree that Sanchez has a lot more upside than Stafford. With those two years to sit and “catch up” to the NFL, Sanchez may very well become the better QB. I think the 49ers, if they take a QB, can afford to aim a little more toward potential than immediate help. I think that’s why the poll is the way it is.

by sfgfan on Mar 24, 2009 8:39 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"We'll see them again in the playoffs." -- Coach Mike Singletary after a gut-wrenching week 3 loss to the Vikings.
Start posting about the 49ers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Montana_action_150-188_1__small
Top NCAA/NFL Prospects
Dave_small
Week 9 Prediction Games
Mc_small
Ask Music City Miracles
Small
The Jimmy Raye play-by-play. Does he really suck?
Dave_small
NN Official Jimmy Raye Discussion FanPost

Recent FanPosts

Gary05-6_small21_small
Niners Forgotten Man Deserves Pro Bowl Recognition
Montana_action_150-188_1__small
Weapons & Matchups (49ers vs. Titans)
Small
Remaining Strength of Schedule
Pictures_110_small
Colts players are dropping like flies!!!!!
Memento-lies_small
The 49ers are coming up short on 3rd down
Frank-gore_small
Strength of Schedule
Small
we are! yea i said it...we are! this is niners nation pledge your alligiance
Funny-pictures12_small
As Promised. Part 2: What Has Gone Wrong?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Turf Show Times
Rams get ratings; TST joins Sprint's NFL Mobile Live
Cincy Jungle
The Cincinnati Bengals should think about lower ticket prices to close the home schedule
Mile High Report
Broncos add Ty Law, Waive CB Jack Williams

SPONSORS


Head Ball Coach

Dave_small Fooch

Editors

Jerry_rice_small ProfessorBigelow

Assistant Coaches

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

Pixies_logo_small Florida Danny

M_12a62905a0324d2da2f43ddaf62c630f_small Ninjames

Duct_tape_bandit_small Josh from Hollywood

Crab_tree_small briandean

Moderators

Jackalope_card_small wjackalope