2009 NFL Draft: Positions to be considered
Over the past few months, draft discussion has often centered on specific players. Someone has followed a certain player in college and thinks the 49ers should draft that player. Nothing wrong with that. When you then get into discussions of draft strategy, it often centers around taking the "best player available," regardless of position.
I wanted to focus the discussion entirely on positions in this post. There have certainly been position discussions, but a lot of times it ends up centering on specific players at that position. So, I thought I'd go through what positions the 49ers would likely address with their nine draft picks. Part of this will be more eliminating positions that won't be drafted as well. Also, we are not including undrafted free agents as filling the role.
No Pick (virtual lock)
K/P: These are easy ones, but they can still be removed. Joe Nedney has been extended through 2011 and Andy Lee is locked up through 2012. Thankfully, the 49ers are set for the near future at 2 simple, and yet key, positions.
Yep, that's it. Those are the only positions that I am willing to guarantee will not be selected this coming weekend. I've combined some of the positions into single units because some positions are either quite obvious or don't require much analysis.
Receivers: I think it's a lock that the 49ers draft a wide receiver at some point. The team has a lot of young depth at the position, but Isaac Bruce might have only one more year. Furthermore, while we'd like all these young receivers to hit, the more you have the more likely you are to have one of them hit.
I'm also including tight end here. The team probably needs a third tight end to fill the blocking role that Billy Bajema handled so ably. If the team decides to bring Sean Ryan back at training camp, then no real need. If not this is probably more of an undrafted free agent or veteran free agent signing.
Offensive Line: It's also a virtual lock that the 49ers draft one or more offensive linemen. Not a shocking pronouncement obviously. Center is set with and Eric Heitmann starting and Cody Wallace as a backup. However, right tackle remains uncertain and guard is no certainty with David Baas in the final year of his contract.
Quarterback: I think most folks agree that a QB needs to be taken at some point in this draft. Some folks want the glamor guy in the first round, while others are willing to wait a few rounds for a diamond in the rough. Either way, I don't think the 49ers are willing to go into next season with an undrafted free agent to develop.
Running Back: I'm including fullback in this group. I don't expect a fullback to be drafted, but some of these bigger running backs might end up doing more FB work than anything else. However, at the traditional running back position, I fully expect the 49ers to grab someone this weekend. There are a million different ways to go, but the powers that be have made it very well known that they want somebody to ease Frank Gore's workload.
After the jump we take a look at the defensive side of the ball and I throw out my predictions for the specific positions drafted this year (although not by round yet).
Defensive Line: Even with a rebound season from Aubrayo Franklin, most of us are in the camp of wanting a nose tackle by the end of the upcoming weekend. The more interesting discussion centers around defensive end. I noticed an interesting comments in that FanPost by rlott#42 about Balmer that has been echoed by others.
The team drafted Kentwan Balmer last year and signed Demetric Evans this year, to go along with Isaac Sopoaga and Ray McDonald. With Justin Smith set as a rock on the other end position, that's a lot of bodies competing for playing time. Maybe you get someone late that you can afford to cut (say 6th or 7th round), but I don't see an even remotely high pick being invested in a 3-4 defensive end. Do you?
Outside Linebackers: We've had plenty of discussions about the pass rushers that could help the 49ers. However, as I mentioned at the end of my Brian Orakpo scouting report, where do you find the playing time? This is one reason I found the first round of the draft so maddening this year. I suppose of any position the 49ers could draft in the first round this year, an outside linebacker would be most likely to make some contribution in the form of a pass rush platoon.
Inside Linebacker: Although the 49ers are set at their starters, they could certainly use some depth. Takeo Spikes is not going to be playing forever, and it would be nice to have some other ILB options. At one point shortly after the college football season ended, Rey Maualuga was projected to the 49ers in some mock drafts. That's unlikely to happen now, but I could see an inside linebacker being picked up, if for nothing more than special teams purposes.
Safety: While Michael Lewis has the strong safety position locked up for now, the free safety position could be a wide open battle at training camp. Dashon Goldson is the front runner by appointment. However, it's no secret that he's had injury issues dating back to college. The team added Jimmy Williams to compete as a safety, but I'd imagine they want to grab one more to be safe. It's even possible they go with a college corner who could be converted to safety. Whatever it is, I'd expect one somewhere.
Cornerback: Continuing with the defensive back position, except for last season, the 49ers drafted at least two defensive backs in the McNolan draft era. Last year they lost a pick because of the Bears issue and had their fewest picks under Nolan. So, not exactly shocking that they didn't go for multiple players at any position. However, I do think they'll be looking at multiple defensive backs (whether it be a safety and a corner, or two corners). They've got some young talent in Reggie Smith and Tarell Brown, but with Walt Harris nearing the end and nobody really knowing what to expect from Shawntae Spencer health-wise, it could be time to reload.
So, what positions are we gonna grab?
Given all this, I'll throw out mildly educated predictions for what positions we'll grab this weekend. I do think there will be trades, but I'll just say they trade down once and trade up once, leaving us with 9 total picks either way (for simplicity's sake):
QB, WR, RB, OT, NT, OLB, CB, S, RB
Feel free to throw out your own predictions.
0 recs |
21 comments
|
Comments
Playing time for OLB
I don’t see a potential problem here. If the rookie comes in and shows he can play all three downs, then I’d gladly sit Lawson in favor of him. Heck, Lawson, Haralson, and the rookie can all rotate, keeping each other fresh. If he shows he can pass rush (which is what he’s being brought in for first and foremost) but fails to show he can cover right off the bat, then let him play first and most second downs while Lawson takes over on the rest of the downs.
If the player is good enough, you make time for him. It’s especially easy to make time with this year’s group of OLBs, as Lawson hasn’t shown a whole lot in his three years that scream at the 49ers to keep him as the starter. Considering they’ve renewed Haralson, Lawson would ultimately be the one to be replaced anyway.
by sfgfan on Apr 20, 2009 3:36 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Lawson is a great 1st and 2nd down player.
No need to take him out of those downs for a rookie, it’s called chemistry. Lawson will improve dramatically next season, the additional weight is always gonna help at his height. If our offense is productive our defense will have two pro bowlers in Lawson and Willis. Of course the pick should be OLB and IMO, Everette Brown is who would be best for us. Maybe we should trade down in front to secure a great pass rusher. He could easily go as early as 4th, but a trade up to Jacksonvilles spot for a future conditional pick (maybe a 4th) and get E Brown. Lawson can spell Spikes on passing downs and Brown and Haralson can get the QB. Lawson was an ineffective pass rusher because of his weight. He’s and outside rusher and in the pros if you’re that light in the A(site decorum) your spin move or inside move will be easy to block (because he is 6’ 6"). E Brown can spell either OLB on 3rd and yes it would be smart to have these guys rested as much as possible and help to be injury free as well.
LG
by rlott#42 on Apr 20, 2009 8:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No need to take him out of those downs for a rookie, it’s called chemistry.
I’m not saying you just take him out to take him out. For argument’s sake, lets say the 49ers take Brown with the #10 pick. If Brown shows that he’s better than Lawson at rushing the passer (which I wouldn’t doubt for one second) AND being about as good if not better in coverage, Brown should get the start.
Why?
Because Brown first and foremost allows the 49ers to be more flexible with blitzes on first and second down. If Lawson is in on first and second down, a blitz of Lawson may very well be futile, but Brown may be more effective (remember I’m suggesting that Brown shows he’s better than Lawson at getting to the passer here). Also, if he shows he’s just as capable dropping back into his zone or manning up with a TE/RB, then teams can’t always expect him to rush, but they have to keep an eye on him anyway.
I’m kind of confused about your whole “chemistry” thing. Wouldn’t there be more chemistry if one player can stay on the field for all three downs, as opposed to having one player for two, and one for one? I’d think so.
by sfgfan on Apr 21, 2009 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
IMHO
OLB pass rush monster is first on the radar. Round 1, hopefully including a trade down unless Orakpo and/or E Brown and/or Maybin are on the 49ers top 10 list and one or more is there for the taking. Otherwise, Matthews, Cody Brown, or Barwin with a trade down plus and extra 2?
We already signed a RT in free agency for some pretty big bucks. Whether he can stay healthy is the question. But one thing we know — he won’t get injured before the draft! So the odds of the 49ers looking for a 1st round stud for the OL makes no financial sense.
Inside DL: Raji, great. But do we need to go round 1 for this position? What about the corwed field we have there already, as Fooch mentioned? Ron Brace round 2? But ditto for that early. Maybe Moala or Dorell Scott in a later round? I’d rather try to pick up Shon Green in round 2 if he’s there.
Maybe except for Delmas these safeties should be there in round 3:
1. Louis Delmas: Western Michigan (6-0, 196)
2. William Moore: Missouri (6-1, 226)
3. Rashad Johnson: Alabama (6-0, 190)
4. Derek Pegues: Mississippi State (5-10, 195)
5. Sherrod Martin: Troy (6-1, 193)
6. Darcel McBath: Texas Tech (6-1, 198)
QB: I would love to target Steve McGee in round 4. Fooch, what do you think? Could he be the guy, and be there for our 4th round pick?
WR: I’d love to see if we can steal Deon Butler, Penn St, high in round 5 if he’s there.
Starting late in round 5 and on we pick up a backup OL, CB, and interior DL and ILB, using a BPA mind set as much as possible.
How about this draft? . . . R U Happy?
Round
1 E Brown or Orakpo. I bet one of them is there, or Snachez is there for a trade down for another PR.
2. Shon Green RB
3. Rashad Johnson or Sherod Martin Safety (If there was a great CB instead. . .but in this draft there isn’t.)
4 Steve McGee QB
5 Deon Butler slot WR
Thoughts? . . . Fooch? . . . . Anyone else?
by Since79 on Apr 20, 2009 4:32 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
We already signed a RT in free agency for some pretty big bucks. Whether he can stay healthy is the question. But one thing we know — he won’t get injured before the draft! So the odds of the 49ers looking for a 1st round stud for the OL makes no financial sense.
If Marvel is beaten out by a rookie than Marvel isn’t getting paid any of those bonuses.
by bignerd on Apr 20, 2009 4:41 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who first?
With 3 starting RT last year and Marvel being a possible liability, my first pick is OL. He’ll be there for 10 years if he any good. #2- is OLB, he can be starter if Lawson gets hurt or loses the position. #3- DB, Possible replacement down the road,if not a outright starter. From than on, RB,QB,WR,OL,DL and last, a GM. that’s right, I’ll trade our last pick for a new GM. (HAHA)
by LASVEGASNINER on Apr 20, 2009 4:52 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree, but we also have to be looking at a replacement for Bass at OG.
The 9ers need a monster at both RT and LG and then of course the OLB.
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
by Eastbayjim on Apr 20, 2009 4:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
7th pick is another OL and can only hope he'll make the cut.
He may be able to replace a backup lineman already on the squad.
by LASVEGASNINER on Apr 20, 2009 5:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
OL is the safest pick.
With so many positions in “need,” and sitting in limbo with the 10th, we must pick somthing that is a guarantee. Im sure the 9ers need a OLB or DE but there are still potential outcomes at those postions with Lawson and the mass DE’s on the roster. Adding another one to the mix will surely leave a number of players in uncertainty.
Going OL is just the best choice, we need depth and with the emphasis on the run game this season, a dominate OL.
If however we dont, Id get a DB, but theres no solid DB….dilemmas dilemmas.
by F120man on Apr 20, 2009 10:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The one position I think everyone is sleeping on is LB. It’s rare for Takeo Spikes to stay healthy for a full year and Jeff isn’t going to inherit the job in 2 years so there is a definite need to get younger.
by bignerd on Apr 20, 2009 5:03 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
From 4th on, you can take a player than will fit into MS system,
I believe the first three are the most important, after that , you can mix and match based on which best player is available. Maybe you don’t need a WR or QB this year. For example, QB or WR may a better pick next year.
by LASVEGASNINER on Apr 20, 2009 5:11 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Hard to argue with that
You repeated the obvious needs as sited by numerous sources.
by Italia1970 on Apr 20, 2009 5:35 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I been saying that since the start of last season. OL and LB.
And it still the same, this year.
by LASVEGASNINER on Apr 20, 2009 5:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i doubt they draft a qb
If you had a lineup of 9 Jack Custs who hit(Cust career average) .239 AVG, .382 OBP, and .475 SLG, then your team would score 6.12 runs per game-totalling to 991runs a season.The 08 rangers lead the majors in runs score with 901.
by 9Custs on Apr 20, 2009 5:36 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
plus i think one of Orakpo, Raji, or Smith will fall to 10
If you had a lineup of 9 Jack Custs who hit(Cust career average) .239 AVG, .382 OBP, and .475 SLG, then your team would score 6.12 runs per game-totalling to 991runs a season.The 08 rangers lead the majors in runs score with 901.
by 9Custs on Apr 20, 2009 5:37 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Playmaker!
I don’t know much about the terminology but if we did trade down and got Maualuga, would he play the same position as Spikes? That would be quite a force. I don’t know if you would want to draft Maualuga but I could imagine he be a backup for Willis, Spikes, and Lawson. Now that I think about it I wouldn’t mind doing that. For WR Barden would be great but what about Aaron Kelly from Clemson? He is 6-5 204. Had a 4.49 40 yard at the combine. That is a little faster than Barden’s 4.57 combine. 1 inch? Shaun Hill/Alex Smith would love 6-5. He hasn’t gotten as much attention as far as I know (Barden starting getting a lot. Heard the raiders could get him round 2). According to http://walterfootball.com/draft2009WR.php he is projected to go in the 4th or 5th.
In Shaun Hill will trust
by iaalexeeff on Apr 20, 2009 8:41 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Hopefully E Brown slips to us
if not the move is to trade down no LT here because at our second pick we take Jamon Meredith who I think will be the best Pro on the OL out of the group. Then we target our Rb and if we trade down and go DB at #17 we still go with Meredith in the 2nd. Jennings at 3 Sam Lee Hill at 4 Antone Smith at 5 Mike Reilly at 5 and whatever fills in the roster.
LG
by rlott#42 on Apr 20, 2009 8:48 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, draft anticipation usually leads to dillusional meanderings
I wanted to see if anybody else feels as comfortable with this very, very unlikely scenario as I (suprisingly) seem to be. I have already suggested a possible deal with the Lions if they choose to pass on Stafford at #1 and take either Curry or Monroe. If Sanchez is still there at ten they could move up from #20 with the #33 pick being the equalizer and snag their QB of the future. This gives us #20, #33, and #43. I would be happy with a host of players at the #20 pick and believe that BPA there gives us maximum value for the pick. It is #33 and #43 that will probably make me look like I am throwing everthing at the wall hoping something will stick. All I can say is that this would be a very exciting scenario.
- the Niners select OT- Phil Loadholt from the University of Oklahoma.
- the Niners select OG- Duke Robinson from…. the University of Oklahoma.
With #74 we take Rashad Jennings, and a late round flyer on Canadian DT- Vaughn Martin
Our line would be sick, we get our change of pace back, theres a good chance that BPA at #20 will be a pass rusher or a DB.
I know I’m crazy, but I can’t stop my brain from spinning, (it’s the hamsters fault)
by SanFranSoldier on Apr 21, 2009 7:23 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


























