49ers Mock Draft: Seven Rounds, Nine Picks
As acting draft dude here at Niners Nation I should probably go on record with my official predictions on what the 49ers will come away with this weekend. Keep in mind, any resemblance to the actual outcome of the draft is purely coincidence. We (as in anybody who thinks they have the foggiest idea what might happen) are most likely all about to get our collective minds blown by what transpires for real.
1. Michael Oher, OT, Ole Miss - OT is the most likely position here due mostly to the fact that there are 4 highly rated OTs and they can't all go in the first 9 picks. Mix that with the (F)ysical style of team Singletary is trying to put together and OT makes the most sense. Raji, Orakpo will most likely be gone while other defensive players like Brown and Jenkins seem to have fallen out of consideration at 10. So, OT it is, could be Oher or Smith, but I'll take the higher character/work ethic guy every time. And the 49ers were reportedly very impressed with Oher in a private visit. Crossing your fingers for Crabtree isn't completely insane.
Three teams drafting in the top-ten picks tell the National Football Post that Ole Miss OT Michael Oher will not fall past the 49ers at No. 10.
The 49ers reportedly "love" Oher and Mike Lombardi says he may go as high as Oakland at No. 7. The Packers would certainly give Oher a look at No. 9.
2. Larry English, OLB, Northern Illinois - I have finally talked myself into being okay with not taking a pass rusher at #10. If enough teams follow suit we could still get a good one in round 2. English is a beast at 6-2, 255 with a good burst, good strength for an OLB and great motor. Could become a Lamar Woodley type player with ten sack per year potential. Other possibilties are Connor Barwin and Michael Johnson or moving back into the 1st to get a falling Everette Brown (yes, please). DB, RB, OT (if we pass on one at #10) and a WR like Harvin, Britt, Nicks or Robiske are all possibilities as well.
3. Ramses Barden, WR, Cal Poly - I like Barden, but he is not without faults. It's possible that some team is in love with him and snatches him up in round 2, but I don't think it's very likely. We've discussed Barden many times, so enough about him. Today McCloughan mentioned he'd like to add a WR with speed, so maybe Barden doesn't fit the bill. This also might be the last chance to grab a starting caliber OT if someone like Phil Loadholt falls. CB, RB are again considerations.
4. Coye Francies, CB, San Jose State - I've been on the Francies bandwagon for a while now. Unfortunately for him, he only ran a 4.63 on the slow combine track. He still matches up well with size and quickness and had a good showing at the Senior Bowl. Can replace Donal Strickland on special teams and has potential for more. Again RB has to be considered, but there are just too many available to pass on these other positions.
5a. James Davis, RB, Clemson - Okay, here's your running back. Happy? This might be the best pick, value wise, to strike on a RB. I agree with the Scouts, Inc. mock draft and select Davis here. His stock has been falling, but he fits nicely with the description of what McSing is looking for in Gore's backup.
5b. Devin Moore, RB/WR/KR, Wyoming - The extra compensatory picks allow the 49ers to get creative. Moore certainly doesn't fit McCloughan's big man criteria at 5-10, 187, but he does give the 49ers a potential big play threat and return man. Wyoming's all-time leading rusher was snubbed for a combine invite, but threw down a 4.33 at his pro day.
6. Mike Reilly, QB, Central Washington - Another hold over from my mock in January. I liked him already and thought he would be a good developmental QB, but then came this little nugget from the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, so you know McCloughan likes him too....second-tier?
"One of the coaches asked me that -- 'Coming from Division II, how is it coming to this combine?' " Reilly said this week. "I told him straight up, 'Hey, I think I'm the best quarterback in this year's draft.'
"I think I caught him off guard, because he looked at me kind of funny. Then I said, 'Hey, I'm not projected as a first-rounder. I'm coming from a small school. But if I don't have that kind of confidence, I'm never going to be able to compete at this level.' "
Score one for the big-armed quarterback from the little school in Ellensburg.
"You've got to love a kid with an attitude like that," said Scot McCloughan, general manager for the San Francisco 49ers.
But the 49ers rank players in three tiers, and they consider Reilly a second-tier player -- which puts him into the late third- to fifth-round category.
"I hear a lot of positive things about him," McCloughan said. "Our scouts think he's a pretty good prospect. Not a high-round guy, but a middle-round guy that's got some upside."
7a. Bear Pascoe, TE, Fresno State - Pascoe is your basic blue-collar type tight end. He won't do much in the passing game, but he can catch it if thrown his way. His calling card will be as a blocker. Solid replacement for former 7th rounder Billy Bajema.
7b. Michael Mitchell, S, Ohio - Mitchell is a sleeper safety from Ohio University. He's got great size (6-0, 221) and speed (4.45) and is a big hitter. Mitchell is unranked on a lot of draft websites. He's a guy who could impact special teams right away and has considerable upside.
Don't like it? Ask me tomorrow and I'll probably have a different opinion.
58 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
i say bah on oher
if we take a tackle in the first round, then it’s got to be Smith imo. I think Raji is the guy if he falls to us. I think we’ll take crabtree (tho i hope we don’t) if he’s available or orakpo. but who the hell knows.
plus i think they should pursue michael bush or Justin Fargas from that team over there.
If you had a lineup of 9 Jack Custs who hit(Cust career average) .239 AVG, .382 OBP, and .475 SLG, then your team would score 6.12 runs per game-totalling to 991runs a season.The 08 rangers lead the majors in runs score with 901.
The sad thing....
That looks like a typical 49ers McNolan draft, so it may play out like that. A lot of skill players late in the draft who we won’t hear from in 2-3 years aside from the occasional special teams play if they are lucky.
Orakpo, Raji, Brown, and Jenkins do so much more to help this franchise than Oher.
The 2nd round is lining up to provide a ton of quality players and whichever organization trades up/down to stockpile picks in the 25-75 range will likely have the best draft.
Rays in '08.... Desmond Jennings - the breakout continues.....
works for me
I like what you have predicted here. McSing isnt trying to become that flashy team out to entertain and wow audiences. They are trying to become winners. You have to go OT with the first pick in my opinion and most likely get a pass rusher in the second round. And hopefully in the later rounds we do find that QB who comes outta nowhere to succeed. Lastly I say no on Crabtree. He’s really not even that big and I heard a rumor that after he had his interview in Cleveland the Browns were no longer interested. Maybe some character issues there but then again its the Browns. Lets go 9ers! less then 48 hours away!
by BarnettBeBallin on Apr 23, 2009 4:56 PM PDT reply actions
I’m on board with an SEC pick (Jerry, Oher, Smith) and I feel ambivalent regarding Sanchez. Orakpo makes me nervous, and Crabtree makes me really nervous. Maclin sounds tempting.
I like Bama’s FS (Johnson?)…if he’s there in the 3rd round hell yes!
Say no to Clemson
You have 2 players from BCS conferences and 3 I-AA players?
I don’t want Sanchez, but if we get a QB let’s get one that has some upside or sign an undrafted QB.
Heaps and Hinder...come on down!
Maclin
i was just thinkin that. Maclins speed is undeniable and we have no receivers like him. could be a nice developing young WR core with Morgan and Zeig. But do you think hes worth the 10 spot assuming the raiders don’t snag him?
by BarnettBeBallin on Apr 23, 2009 5:19 PM PDT up reply actions
D-Mo
This is a very perceptive mock. I’m actually a coach for the Wyoming Cowboys and head coach Singletary called about a week ago asking about Devin Moore. He will be a steal for whoever picks him up. Just to clear something up about him, Moore is closer to 195 pounds, and the kid has the hardest work ethic of any player I have ever coached. He put up 225 on the bench 28 times, which is more than Aaron Curry, Brian Cushing, or Rey Maualuga! He’s a great kid and he’ll make a big impact on Sundays.
That’s good to know, coach. Makes me like him even more. Thanks for stopping in to tell us about “D-Mo”. Always thought Moore would be a late riser in the draft process, but still not a lot of people are talking about him. Could be a real Sproles type. And this team needs some of that. For those of you who have no idea who Devin Moore is, here’s a little clip.
I like it
Oher isn’t really my preference at 10 but if everything else worked out as you’re showning I think it would be a pretty damn solid draft.
Don't sweat it. I'm illiterate.
brian...
i obviously defer to you when it comes to the draft…quick question though….
historically, teams don’t take projected RTs in the top 10. wouldn’t the niners be insane to commit top 10 $$$ to a guy who’s at best going to be their RT-of-the-future? i realize moving staley back to RT is an option, but i can’t see it happening due to a rookie unseating him. also, looking at mccloughan’s previous 1st round picks, they’ve all been at positions where there was an obvious need for a starter. even balmer last year was projected at LDE, which is a position tat hasn’t exactly been manned by an all-pro in recent seasons.
with that said, question 2: if crabtree is still available at 10, do the niners take him over oher? i think they’d have to, if only to see whether mcloughan really is full of sh*t about being such a BPA guy. anyway, interested in your thoughts here.
by (Florida) Danny Tuccitto on Apr 23, 2009 9:38 PM PDT reply actions
I think they definitely take Crabtree over Oher, and everyday it seems a little more possible that Crabtree could be there, which would be ideal to me. I would take Oher over Maclin, though.
I’d rather not go with OT at #10, but that’s most likely the position that will hold the most value when the 49ers are on the clock. A dominating line can’t be a bad thing, but you’re right, putting so much into a RT isn’t ideal. He’s athletic enough to stick at LT, so after a year or two Oher could swap with Staley, but he’d probably start out on the right side to get his feet wet.
glad to hear you're seeing the same thing i am...
…namely, that crabtree is falling. i read last night that CLE has all but ruled him out at 5. it could be a smokescreen, but it doesn’t sound like it. not to mention the edwards-to-NYG trade is becoming less and less likely with every passing second. also, i just don’t see mangini and the new GM (BAL’s former VP of pro personnel) taking a WR that early.
so, if crabtree gets past CLE, i don’t see him going to anyone from 6-9:
6) CIN — maybe, but they’ve got ochocinco and they need more help at other positions.
7) OAK — they like maclin better.
8) JAC — they just signed torry holt, del rio is a defense/running game guy, and their D regressed a lot last year without stroud.
9) GB — um, they don’t need WR.
i’m thinking more and more that crabtree is going to be there at 10 for SF. i’d much rather they take him than another OL. and like i said, i’d simply love to see the situation where BPA-believer mccloughan has to actually choose between the clear BPA and the 4th-best OL. would make me crack up if he passed on crabtree in that situation. he’d be excommunicated from the BPA church.
your thoughts?
by (Florida) Danny Tuccitto on Apr 24, 2009 8:01 AM PDT up reply actions
I don’t see Browns or Raiders drafting Crabtree. Dont think Al Davis will draft Maclin either. All this talk about Al loving speed is true, but usually it’s later round projects. Did you know that the Raiders haven’t drafted first round WR since Tim Brown in 1988? I have them going another direction at #7…don’t want to spoil my mock, tough. :)
maclin is an al davis special...
…based on history, i don’t see the 49ers taking him.
mcloughan seems to like taking the 1st guy at a certain position with his 1st pick:
2005: smith was the 1st QB taken in the draft
2006: VD was the 1st TE taken in the draft
2007: willis was the 1st LB taken in the draft
2008: balmer was the 1st 3-4 DE taken in the draft (dorsey and ellis were short-and-fat 4-3 DT types, while harvey and jackson were tall-and-light 4-3 DE types)
therefore, it would buck trend considerably for mccloughan to take the 2nd-best WR (maclin) with his 1st-round pick were crabtree to be gone already…same goes for oher. mccloughan’s not taking the 4th-best OL with his lone 1st-round pick. well, at least if he does, it’d be the first time he goes that far down the position well that early.
by (Florida) Danny Tuccitto on Apr 24, 2009 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions
I was just going to write this
If the 49ers draft someone called Bear Pascoe, I don’t care what else happens for the rest of the year
It's never too soon to jump to conclusions
by alea iacta est on Apr 24, 2009 9:58 AM PDT up reply actions
Is OT a need?
I know that is a silly question but as people talk about dafting for need and BPA is RT at 10 doing either? Espescially when the draft is so deep in OT’s
Lets face it there can’t be a 9ers fan out there who wouldn’t at least pat Mcloughan on the back if he managed to trade down. There is no player worthy of the pick who fits need, when the real need is an upgrade across the team. Yes the priorities have to be Pass defence orientated and some skill – somewhere.
I am all for building up the OFF and DEF lines but as FD’s articles over the last weks have shown picking skill positions lower in the draft is like buying a lottery ticket. The more you have the more chance of winning but the odd one is just another piece of paper trash, a less skilled lineman can develop themselves physicaly to be a force, whereas if you don’t have the skill, you don’t have the skill and the late round diamonds haven’t exactly been the teams speciality in recent years
If you have to pick at 10, pick skill and the only problem there is contributors in their first season are rare at WR and there isn’t a RB or DB really worth the 10th pick except maybe Jenkins and then its a maybe, another QB seems dubious espescially with such a good looking potential group next year.
So I’d say whoever is the best consensus Pass rusher left, whoever the 9ers have highest on their board, but if its trade down time I think that would suit the team more
Don't like trade down
The more I think about it, I realize this team needs playmakers and impact guys. I’d much rather take the BPA at #10 and look to move up from the 2nd round back into the 1st if one of McCloughan’s 18 players who have 1st round value falls into the 20s.
Why settle for the best rusher at #10 when you could get a franchise WR/OT/NT and then be proactive in adding the best player you can after that and trade into a spot where value and need match up.
draft's sweet spot
This year’s draft has a sweet spot between 20-50 where the talent really is about even with the #10-20 talent and the cost of signing those players is reasonable. The 49ers would be much better served getting 3 selections in that range than having a #10 and #43.
Unless a guy like Raji, Crabtree, or Andre Smith drops to #10, then they are better off moving down. Even with those players on the board the Niners may be better served moving down if they can stockpile picks in the 20-40 range (Patriots for example).
Rays in '08.... Desmond Jennings - the breakout continues.....
by youALREADYknow on Apr 24, 2009 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions
I disagree about the sweetspot and so does McCloughan if he’s being honest about thenm haveing ojly 18 players on their board with 1st round grades. Generally, I’m a trade down guy, but this team doesn’t just need more bodies, they need impact IMO.
Interesting you bring up Patriots, becuase reports today are saying NE is looking to package some picks and move from #23 to somewhere near the top 10.
18 on their board
That comment was in regards to last year’s draft and why he took Balmer if I remember correctly. There’s no way he would tip his hand about this year’s draft before it started. If he did, please provide that link.
As far as this year’s draft is concerned, I doubt there are even 15 with solid 1st round grades. I see a lot of 1st/2nd round tweeners who can either make an immediate impact with limited upside or need a lot of development but have huge upside.
This team doesn’t just need more bodies like you said, but it needs more athletic ones pretty much across the board.
Rays in '08.... Desmond Jennings - the breakout continues.....
by youALREADYknow on Apr 24, 2009 3:05 PM PDT up reply actions
From McCloughan"s presser Wednesday.
-Q: How many players do you have with first-round grades in this draft?
-McCLOUGHAN: 18 this year.
-Q: You usually have 20 to 22?
-McCLOUGHAN: It varies. 17 to 20, 21.
-Q: Last year didn’t you have the top 18 ranked in a row on your board, exactly as they were drafted?
-McCLOUGHAN: The way we had them ranked… The first 18 picks was our one through 18, in the order we had them.
But the thing about this year… who knows what’s going to happen? It’s going to be very interesting where the second quarterback, when he goes. I think it’s going to be interesting where the third tackle goes. That’s going to affect a lot of stuff that happens.
thanks
The most interesting thing he says is “third tackle”. I personally take that to mean that Oher is not a top 10 prospect on the 49ers board because he’s universally the 4th best tackle in this class.
I’m shocked he announced that before the draft this year though. Might be the most revealing comments anyone in the organization has made so far.
This draft is the most intriguing in recent memory.
Rays in '08.... Desmond Jennings - the breakout continues.....
by youALREADYknow on Apr 24, 2009 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions
you misunderstood the statement
If he said he’s looking at where the third tackle goes, it gives off a vibe that there are three tackles under consideration at #10 in his eyes. If he wanted the 4th tackle, then he would have probably said it will be interesting to see where the fouth tackle goes. The question becomes whether Oher is a top 3 tackle on their board. I personally still don’t see how Oher is in the top 10 on anyone’s board, but if he’s the 3rd best tackle on theirs then it’s possible.
Rays in '08.... Desmond Jennings - the breakout continues.....
by youALREADYknow on Apr 24, 2009 6:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Here is why Oher could be Top 10
2 QBs . . . some question really whether top 10 talent
2 WR . . . huge questions on both, neither in the Calvin Johnson, Larry Fitz mold so I think it’s questionable either are solid Top 10
1 RB . . . I think Beanie should be considered Top 10 but isn’t.
0 TE . . . next
0 G . . . never Top 10
OT . . . At least 3 and possibly Oher is the 4th (he has the measurements)
3 DE/OLB . . . were considered but each has a glaring hole. Only Orakpo looks assured Top 10. Maybin and Brown are small for the position.
1 DL/NT . . . Just Raji
1 LB . . . Curry and even LB typically aren’t Top 10 picks
0 S . . . no good candiates this year
0 CB . . . Jenkins ran to slow and Davis has character issues.
In conclusion, only 3 defenders have been considered Top 10 worthy (Curry, Raji and Okapro). Questions remain on the WR but 1 will probably go Top 10. Lets just count the 2 QBs. That means we have room for 4 OT in top 10. Like I’ve mentioned. Oher is just as big, gifted and athletic as the other three, just less polished.
agree to disagree on a few on the defensive side
On some boards, M. Jenkins, T. Jackson, and maybe R. Ayers will be in the top 10.
Oher could be top 10 on someone’s board, never denied that. I just don’t personally see what logic would go into that. Britton and Beatty have better size and athleticism than Oher and trust me.. he’s not as athletic as J. Smith, big as A. Smith, or polished as any of those three.
Rays in '08.... Desmond Jennings - the breakout continues.....
by youALREADYknow on Apr 25, 2009 9:43 AM PDT up reply actions
third tackle
That stuck with me too. Or maybe he means, since there’s 3 good QBs and 4 good OTs it could force somebody to move up and get the last of the top tier guys. Who knows?
Maybe
Get rid of davis and draft a Gamecock…. Jasper Brinkley
NO QB… take Arian Foster for a big body and short yardage back.
No TE… sign a Undrafted FA … Go OLB or G to get lucky on a gem of a pass specialist or give a G a year under Baas to see if he can develop so we can let Baas go
You're complaining about taking a 7th round TE?
And the Niners have to take a QB somewhere in this years draft.
Don't sweat it. I'm illiterate.
by methodrampage on Apr 24, 2009 7:30 AM PDT up reply actions
Complaining?
Just saying what i would do… Davis can block on running downs and goal line… he’s a good blocker.
I think we will take a QB but i dont see the point considering we will probably take a QB in the first or second round next year. Hill can play, Smith will get a look if he is ok to throw, Huard had some bright moments in KC and is a capable Veteran…. i will wait on a QB considering a pretty good class could come out next year
You take a QB this year so you possibly don't have to take one early next year
If the Niners take a QB this year and he impresses then the need to take a QB early next year is greatly reduced.
Don't sweat it. I'm illiterate.
by methodrampage on Apr 24, 2009 2:56 PM PDT up reply actions
Also what’s the point of taking on QB in the later rounds this year? At that point the QB becomes a long term project. If the team needs a QB next year it’s not going to turn to that later round pick.
To develop a QB. IF you look around the league at starters, they aren’t all 1st rounders. A first rounder would need development too.
bingo
Spending a 2nd-4th rounder on a QB every 2 years is probably more effective than spending the huge money on a #1 and putting all of your eggs in one basket. I believe this club needs a 3rd stringer and finding one in rounds 5-7 would be a wise idea. I personally think Graham Harrell would be a good late-round investment because unlike some other TTU QB’s he’s shown accuracy downfield.
Rays in '08.... Desmond Jennings - the breakout continues.....
by youALREADYknow on Apr 24, 2009 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions
We've been over this
The overwhelming majority of starting NFL QB’s are 1st round picks. Essentially you are holding a lottery ticket drafting later expecting to land a Tom Brady.
exactly
Maybe the late rounder takes off and becomes a starter in a coupl eyears after the Hill/Smith thing plays out. Maybe he flops and is gone in two years, no harm done.
Except
Your 2nd – 4th round picks are suppose to become starters around 65% of the time. You can’t waste one of those picks every 2 years on QB who will wash out. Also, any QB who might even possibly be an NFL starter is drafted in the 1st round. Rarely is the draft so deep that you find a guy past round 1 who isn’t a complete project at QB.
wow, wait?
You can’t wait a 2nd-4th rounder on someone, but think you can waste a 1st?
First, I’d like to see where 2nd-4th rounders are becoming starters 65% of the time. Second, the money that goes into a 1st rounder means you better find someone who will at least be a contributor for 4-5 years. Backup QB’s don’t generally contribute…. they hold clipboards.
Any organization drafting QB’s in the first round more than once every 7-10 years gets a failing grade. There are only a handful of QB’s each decade who are worth spending a #1 pick on. At other positions, players can make positive contributions without being All-Pro caliber. An average NFL QB is someone waiting to lose their job. Average QB’s can be found in rounds 2-4 given 1-2 years to learn. Check any NFL depth chart and you’ll see the league littered with adequate NFL backups who could perform at an average level.
Rays in '08.... Desmond Jennings - the breakout continues.....
by youALREADYknow on Apr 24, 2009 6:06 PM PDT up reply actions
one more thing brian..
…i was actually researching this in re bignerd’s earlier post about crabtree. you wrote:
doesn’t fit McCloughan’s big man criteria at 5-10, 187
here are the measurables for the WRs mccloughan has taken:
j. morgan (‘08-6) — 6’0", 219, 4.47
j. hill (‘07-3) — 6’1", 204, 4.32
b. williams (‘06-3) — 5’9", 179, 4.52
m. maxwell (‘05-7) — 6’4", 205, 4.41
at 5’10", 187, this puts him squarely in williams territory from a size perspective. at 4.33, he’s in hill territory. both hill and williams were 3rd-rounders. my point here is not that moore is a 3rd-rounder. rather, it’s that mccloughan doesn’t seem to really have a “big man criteria.” maybe with 7th-round fliers he likes the massive WR, but he’s been more than willing — hell, seemingly eager — to take WRs who are merely average in size. the more and more i research mccloughan’s drafts, the more i feel like everything he says in public about his draft strategy is a smokescreen.
oh, by the way, crabtree: 6’1", 215. that sure fits the hill and morgan mold in terms of size, no?
by (Florida) Danny Tuccitto on Apr 24, 2009 8:25 AM PDT reply actions
I think...
… McCloughan likes 200+ pounds, and I think the “criteria” encompasses all his acquisitions, not just his drafts. Height isn’t as big of an issue, it seems. Of course, I could be wrong. I do agree he’ll sacrifice some size for some speed in the later rounds of the draft, though.
It kind of makes sense, though, if he’s looking for WRs who can block downfield. Most of these more “physical” WRs have to have a little more bulk on them, which pushes a 6 foot tall guy from maybe 190-195 to 205-215. Crabtree, to me, seems like the perfect McCloughan WR, in terms of size/build.
I agree
Crabtree certainly fits, he’s a little bigger than Hill and Morgan, but those guys aren’t undersized at all. Williams was the only undersized guy, but I think that was Nolan’s pick because he liked his toughness during Senior Bowl week. Plus Moore is more of a RB and that’s where McCloughan’s size preference comes into play a little more than at WR, where speed is more of a factor.
Top 10 Drafted WR
Are always bigger than 6-3 or run a sub 4.4 40 yard. Crabtree doesn’t meet either criteria so you really are gambling that he is the BPA anywhere in Top 15-20 picks. I think Crabtree is Percy Harvin minus facing SEC defenses. Stripping away the big college hype I see Crabtree as a typical late 1st round prospect like Harvin.
In contrast, Oher might be rated the 4th best OT but he does meet the physical criteria of a Top 10 OT pick. 6-5, 300lb+, long arms and quick feet. He’s simply less polished than the other 3 OT ahead of him.
I could live with this draft.
With the glaring exception of WR Ramses Barden. I just don’t think he can be a #1 because he lacks the quickness to separate and the downfield speed to attract double coverage. He’s a possession/redzone receiver and the 3rd round is too high for him.
My only other complaint would be the absence of a NT. Vaughn Martin from Western Ontario in the 5th would be a great pick to get a true 2-gapper at the nose.
I really like Mike Reilly as a QB prospect, too, but I suspect he can be had in the 7th round as he has disappeared off bigboards and dropped into the 300+ region at NFLDraftScout.
Never seen Vaughn Martin play, I’ll look him up. I was looking for a NT in there somewhere, just didn’t fit. Terrence Taylor and Roy Miller are guys that could be good rotational NTs. 2nd round for Ron Brace is a little early IMO, but I’d love him in the 3rd.
With Reilly you could maybe wait until the 7th, but I went by McCloughan’s quote who seems to be willing to draft him a little higher.

by 







































