San Francisco 49ers OTA spotlight: SS Reggie Smith
It's only been one day of offseason training activities, but enough happened yesterday that we can start to ponder what could be in the coming season. Our boys Barrows and Maiocco were out there providing plenty of coverage. That included a run down of the first team offenses. At this point, any missing first teamers were due to injury (Michael Lewis) or veteran status (Isaac Bruce).
I thought for today we would focus on Reggie Smith. It's really a continuation of yesterday's discussion about Jimmy Williams, but I wanted to move it more towards looking ahead now. Jimmy Williams was released yesterday and it seems like the writing is on the wall for Reggie Smith to get his shot as a backup safety. Mike Singletary even said it was more likely in his notebook yesterday.
Back a couple months ago, Jeff_Fuller_49 put together a FanPost titled "How About Reggie Smith at Safety?" That FanPost actually posited the theory of stick Reggie Smith out there at free safety. The addition of Curtis Taylor and the subtraction of Jimmy Williams would seem to indicate strong safety is future position. Not a shocking statement, but just wanted to make sure it was out there.
In looking at some old footage of Reggie Smith (a little YouTube suggested in the FanPost after the jump), I certainly remain intrigued by Smith's skill-set. He seems like a bigger tackling type of guy who would fit well as a strong safety. At the same time he can show a little bit of speed when need be.
I looked up some old draft scouting reports at scout.com and came across this:
An instinctive defender who plays with physicality and loves to hit, Smith is an assignment-true cornerback who has the versatility to play safety, a position that might be his home in the pros because of his lack of deep speed to run with the quicker wideouts . . . The 49ers want to try him at cornerback first because of his ability to match up with the physical receivers in the NFC West, but it's an added bonus he has the skills that could easily transition to safety. His rangy skills may quickly land him a role in secondary coverage packages.
Michael Lewis recently turned 29 and is signed through 2012. I know some people take issue with Michael Lewis, but given his role in the defense, I'm perfectly content with what he brings to the table. Reggie Smith could turn into an excellent back-up option for this season and potentially develop into a starter down the line.
Smith didn't see a lot of playing time this season, but I'm sure most of us agree he'll see a sizeable increase this season. The question is where he'll see playing time if Michael Lewis is healthy. Is he just there for depth, or do we see him getting into nickel or dime defense? After all, we've still got Tarell Brown to discuss. Or are we just getting ahead of ourselves since he hasn't actually proven he's an NFL caliber defender?
0 recs |
11 comments
|
Comments
I know this is off the subject
I just read about the stadium propably being built in santa clara so i am worried does that mean were the santa clara 49ers and do we get to take our history with us or our we like an expantion team freaking out could someone answer those for me
cppeter
by foreveryoung66 on May 19, 2009 8:44 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Logistics
The logistics aren’t even available yet. The Yorks have said that they want to stay “The San Francisco 49ers” even if they moved to Santa Clara. Of course, the city of San Francisco will have a thing or two to say about that.
by sfgfan on May 19, 2009 9:39 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
New York
The jets and giants play in New Jersey. No way we would be Santa Clara 49ers. Especially because we have 5 SB rings.
by iaalexeeff on May 19, 2009 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The city of San Francisco
Can “suck it”
They are the ones that refuse to cooperate…
I especially hate that one congress woman, she doesn’t like the 49ers and doesn’t want them to bear the San Francisco title.
by chikmagnet_565 on May 19, 2009 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Technically...
… the Yorks are the ones not cooperating with SF. San Francisco, like most major metropolitan areas, is very limited in terms of usable public space and the public funds to fix said public spaces. The city has offered up the old Naval Shipyard, but the time frame for building there doesn’t suit what the 49ers are looking for. If I recall, in order to clean all the toxic waste out of the shipyard, it would take upwards of a decade or more. The 49ers, when they first approached Santa Clara, says that they were looking for a date closer to 2012.
The city of San Francisco was kind of caught between a rock and hard place. They don’t have the vast open space that is ready to be built on that Santa Clara does. This is not to mention the fact that the 49ers offices are already in Santa Clara, and practically across the street from where the site of the new stadium would be.
by sfgfan on May 19, 2009 3:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why not convert Golden Gate Park to Niner's Park and build a new stadium there?
Ok. that was a bit much …. but that is the only space SF has
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
by Eastbayjim on May 19, 2009 3:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Smith's playing time.
I think Reggie Smith’s playing time could come in the same situations we saw Strickland come in last year. Strickland was almost the default extra DB when the 49ers went with a single extra DB. Considering that Smith is supposedly able to play coverage as well as play the run, he sounds a lot like a slightly bigger Strickland.
On a non-serious note: Smith was immediately my FS last year in Madden. As Michael Lewis slowly dissipated (read: one or two years into the Franchise mode), I moved Smith to SS and finally promoted Goldson to FS.
by sfgfan on May 19, 2009 9:38 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
thanks
I apperciate you doing that for me i been real worried about the future of our team so basicly we play a wait and see i can live with that for now
cppeter
by foreveryoung66 on May 19, 2009 10:59 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Hey...
Thanks, Fooch!
"The voice of the intellect is a soft one, but it does not rest until it has gained a hearing"
by Jeff_Fuller_49 on May 19, 2009 2:47 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 





















