Niners Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Guest Blogger: Juco All-American Answers Five Questions

NFC West Position-by-Position: Wide Receivers

We're three weeks into our divisional discussions and we've discussed the quarterbacks and running backs.  This week we move onto the wide receiver position.  This is one position where I'm especially excited heading into the 2009 season.  While there might not be a homerun threat quite yet, there is a ton of young talent that could be on the verge of stepping up to the next level.

As far as the ranking below within the division, I'd personally rather have our young talent than Seattle's receivers.

1. Arizona Cardinals
2. Seattle Seahawks
3. San Francisco 49ers
4. St. Louis Rams

Arizona Cardinals
Blogger: cgolden
(Disclaimer: You can go ahead and sound the homer alert) The Arizona Cardinals have the best group of wide receivers that the NFL has to offer, and it's not even close. Larry Fitzgerald stated his case as the best WR in the league with his record setting playoff performance to cap off his third 1,400 yard season before his 26th birthday. No wide receiver is better at snagging to that ball at it's highest point and the fact that he still acknowledges that he can get better is down right scary.

Anquan Boldin, when healthy, is a full back in a wide receivers' body. He's got the toughness to catch a ball the middle and lay some wood to any defender that gets in his way. He won't run by many defenders but he's still a factor in the red zone because of his ability to make the tough catch and take a shot. Steve Breaston came out of nowhere to post over 1,000 yards in just his second season and he's the perfect vertical threat to compliment Fitz and Q. He also made a case that he's more than a slot receiver by averaging five receptions and 61 yards per game in weeks that Boldin missed due to injury. He's still a raw receiver but at the age of 25, he's got plenty of time to improve.

Jerheme Urban and Early Doucet round out the depth chart and they'll fight for the 4th WR role in 2009. Urban's a decent receiver who does many things well but doesn't really excel in any one category. Doucet's entering his second season and has looked very impressive during off season workouts, so far, but the talent above him will limit his playing time. Doucet was called a "Boldin-clone" after the draft last year and he's a guy that the staff has been very high on, so a semi-breakout season doesn't seem so far-fetched. Grade: A (although for the record, that doesn't do this unit justice)

Star-divide

Seattle Seahawks
Blogger: John Morgan
Week one at Buffalo, Seattle started Courtney Taylor at flanker. That’s sort of the “For sale: Baby shoes…” of Seattle’s 2008 season. Starting split end Nate Burleson was injured and lost for the season that same game. Deion Branch was not fully healed but not put on the PUP list. He would suffer a compensation injury, landing one legged and suffering a stone bruise against the Giants, and miss five more weeks. Bobby Engram cracked a bone in his shoulder and missed the first three weeks of the season. Ben Obomanu—

Suffice it to say, Seattle flunked out at wide receiver in 2008.

Seattle signed marquee free agent TJ Houshmandzadeh on March 2nd. The soon to be 32 year old free agent receiver will wear Engram’s old number, 84, and Engram is a pretty good exemplar for what Seattle can realistically hope from Houshmandzadeh. He’s a bit injury prone and his run after catch numbers are trending down, but his hands are excellent and so is his ability to box out and create space. Housh is a sub-superstar with an unforgettable name so he’s famous and a comparison to Engram may seem modest, but Engram was a steady and supremely productive possession receiver for Seattle and that’s what Houshmandzadeh should be, if in a bigger role.

Deion Branch makes this unit above average. Branch has a bad reputation for being fragile, but before the freak ACL tear in the 2007 Division round and the collateral damage it wreaked on the 2008 season, Branch had missed just six games in his previous three seasons. Branch is not impervious or even tough, but the often repeated phrase that he’s “made of glass” ignores that he missed two weeks in 2006 because of a contract holdout not injury and that ACL injuries take as much as a year to fully recover from. It wasn’t a year after Branch’s surgery until a month after Seattle’s season ended.

And yet Branch tantalized with his agility, likely still recovering, his concentration and open field moves and made a pretty good case, if brief and ultimately futile, that he could be an absolute stud in a West Coast Offense. He has great hands, great open field moves, an explosive redirect and good speed, making him, at his best, a bit like a slighter, shorter Greg Jennings.

Nate Burleson is a better athlete than receiver, but away from Mike Holmgren’s exacting system, he might finally show more production than potential. It will help if plays out of the slot, because he doesn’t separate well and that leads to stretches where he disappears. Because he was once a dangerous returner, fans tend to think Burleson’s best skill is run after catch, but that hasn’t been true since his thousand yard season in 2004. Wes Welker can attest, RAC yards are there for the taking when opposing defenses play Cover Randy Moss coverage. I’ve never been a huge fan of Burleson, but he’s not yet 28 and very athletic, so there’s hope he could become a good receiver and great slot receiver.

Seattle has a few more talents on its roster worth mentioning. Third round pick Deon Butler is instantly one of the fastest receivers in football, but beyond that, a good resume at Penn State, and a reputation for good route running, there’s little else we can be sure of. Transitioning to the NFL can take time, and the specific reason a receiver does not yet or even never pans out is unpredictable.

Ben Obomanu could be good depth, but has proven so far to be little more than an occasional deep threat that's pretty bad at being a deep threat. He might blossom if his role is expanded, but it's a long shot.

Practice Viking Courtney Taylor is polished and athletic and reaching a crossroads as a player. One path leads to a gunner job, should he want one, and an early retirement. The other, should he sharpen his route running and make his hands not just good, but consistently good, is a job as a wide receiver in the NFL. The first path is much more likely. His famous flameout and preseason no-shows afford him little patience, and he doesn’t have the draft pedigree or pure tools to bounce around the league. He does have good tools and therefore good potential, but somewhere, where Taylor’s talent meets Jerry Rice’s work ethic, there’s a good player, but then Rice’s work ethic was as rare and amazing a talent as Randy Moss’s speed or Barry Sanders moves.

Grade: B

San Francisco 49ers
Blogger
: Fooch

Sound the homer alert here as well, although I certainly won't claim the best receivers in the league, or even in the division.  However, I'm quite excited about the 49ers wide receivers heading into 2009 as this post will indicate.

The national media attention has focused primarily on Michael Crabtree (heartiest thanks to Al Davis).  While he is certainly a supremely talented wide receiver, the 49ers receiver corps was already beginning to develop into a solid unit.  They lack the home run threat of a Larry Fitzgerald, but they make up for that with great potential five to six receivers deep.  This is arguably the best group of 49ers receivers since Jeff Garcia was slinging the ball to Terrell Owens and Tai Streets (who had one really solid year).

Isaac Bruce brings the veteran experience and was the leading receiver last season.  At this point he's probably the #1 receiver, coming off a solid 2008, but at some point he'll give way to the youngsters behind him.  The team signed Brandon Jones this offseason and are hoping he can finally take a step up in performance (41 receptions last season).  Outsiders would probably view those two as the starting receivers given the experience of one and the price tag of the other.  However, there's a decent chance one, if not both, will be coming off the bench at some point this season.  The most likely player to break through as a starter this season is Josh Morgan, a second year receiver out of Virginia Tech.  Although he was a sixth round pick last year, injuries got him enough training camp playing time to push him to second on the depth chart behind Bruce.  A preseason staph infection and midseason groin injury slowed him down considerably.  While his numbers weren't spectacular, he showed some flashes of big time potential, most notably on his game-winning touchdown catch in the final two minutes against St. Louis.

Amidst the fanfare of Josh Morgan, Jason Hill showed solid improvement in his sophomore campaign.  Hill played primarily in the slot last season, but has seen time as the starting Z receiver in voluntary workouts ahead of Brandon Jones.  Training camp and preseason will be huge for the trio of Morgan/Hill/Jones in determining who gets starting time.  At this point I honestly don't know who the two starting receivers will be for the 49ers.  While some might argue that shows no clear cut strength there, I think it's a sign of the new-found depth the 49ers have at the position.

The 49ers receivers wrap up with a battle between Dominique Zeigler and Arnaz Battle for a possible sixth receiver position.  Battle is entering the final year of his contract and appears to have maxed out his abilities.  While never great, he's been a tough, gritty receiver and solid special teamer for the 49ers through some lean years.  Zeigler is a guy with a pretty stark contrast among 49ers fans.  Some are convinced he'll be a solid contributor and thus is worth holding onto.  Others would have no problem sticking him back on the practice squad even if it means somebody else grabs him.

I've held back discussing Crabtree because I actually expect his draft season foot problems to slow him down out of the gates.  While I certainly expect contributions from Crabtree, I'd prefer to operate under a conservative assumption and be pleasantly surprised by whatever he does contribute.  Furthermore, I think the 49ers have sufficient depth to cover any growing pains for Crabtree.

All in all, I think the 49ers are in excellent shape going forward at receiver.  I won't give them an A because they haven't produced at a sufficient level yet.  I won't give them a C because I believe the talent is that good.  Grade: B

St. Louis Rams
Blogger: VanRam
If ever there was a place for an "incomplete" grade... The Rams have no shortage of receivers on the roster, but there's a dearth of experience among those candidates. Donnie Avery, coming off a solid rookie season, leads the pack, and his speed and hands make him a reliable option as the #1 WR. On the other side is most likely Keenan Burton, who showed real potential in duty limited by injury, the depth chart and a poor offense. The team is hoping Laurent Robinson can regain the promise he showed in 2007 with the Falcons as the number three guy. From there, the receivers get even more questionable. Tim Carter has the most career receptions, 80, but he hasn't played since 2007. Fifth round pick Brooks Foster was the third WR in a talented group at North Carolina.

The lack of experience and a prototypical playmaker type has fans and pundits alike pointing to the Rams receiver corps as a red flag. However, the success last year of Miami's relatively unproven and unknown group of receivers and the success of the Eagles earlier in the decade (http://www.turfshowtimes.com/2009/5/4/864595/no-experience-no-problem-can-the) stand as reassuring precendent for fans. The implementation of Pat Shurmur's West Coast style offense and the return of Steven Jackson behind a bolstered offensive line should help overcome the experience thing.

Still, we just won't know until we see them play. Grade: C

Poll
Who has the best WRs in the NFC West AFTER Arizona?
St. Louis Rams
14 votes
San Francisco 49ers
678 votes
Seattle Seahawks
210 votes

902 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 33 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Yeah

I really don’t see how you can argue one over the other.
If anything, we should be given the argument with two young studs to their one, old, star.

MURS for President!!!!!!!

by jtoj on May 29, 2009 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Granted

If you aren’t following the Niners very closely, you probably have no idea about the strength of their receiving corps. I suspect a lot of fans in the NFC West are going to be unpleasantly surprised by the team’s wide receivers.

by Bob On The Coast on May 29, 2009 3:43 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Rec'd

For marginalizing Crabtree’s impact this year. Best to keep expectations low because he’s really behind with that foot injury.

Should peak over at the Rams, Cards and Hawks board. Probably saying, Morgan who?

by bignerd on May 29, 2009 6:13 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Links

It’s not up at the Rams site yet, but Field Gulls posted it, as did Revenge of the Birds.

They all think I’m nuts for giving them a B. And most talk about Bruce and Crabtree as the starters. Very little mention of Morgan, Hill and Brandon Jones. I’ve made some comments at both sites and have gotten expected responses.

by Fooch on May 29, 2009 6:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh well . . .

Seahawk fans have been delusional all off season. They really think they are making a deep playoff run. I think the team will start the rebuilding process around Week 8.

Cardinal fans have been so enamored by their own success last season that they aren’t paying attention to anyone else.

by bignerd on May 29, 2009 6:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As opposed to the 49ers fanbase, who think they'll not only have a winning season, but make the playoffs?

Seriously, I can’t get over that some really believe the 49ers have a ‘B’ situation at QB.

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on May 30, 2009 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

After taking a peak

It looks like I was right. Fooch is under attack on the other boards.

Common opinion:

  1. WR – Bruce washed up
  2. WR – Crabtree is a rookie

How can you give them anything higher than C?

It’s good none of them see Morgan coming. They seem to measure receivers by 1000 yard production. The 49ers haven’t fit that conventional model. The team has played situation football and tried to spread the ball around. It’s reasonable to expect Bruce, Morgan, Crabtree and Hill to all have around 40-60 catches this season, each getting their number called in situations that suite their skills best.

Another issue being brought up on the other forums is all B’s Fooch has graded. I will agree this the 49ers best offensive unit by far in years. QB isn’t ideal up manageable. RB, WR and TE has a lot of depth and solid talent. The only position with a question mark is RT on the O-line.

by bignerd on May 29, 2009 6:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

grades

I can see giving me crap about the B for QBs (although I’d still defend it), but for running back and receiver I don’t think it’s a crazy grade.

by Fooch on May 29, 2009 6:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Our starter

has a .700 winning percentage.

Just saying.

by Bob On The Coast on May 29, 2009 6:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

...Largely playing with the league's easiest schedule.

With buttery soft teams like the LOLSKINS, Rams and Bills.

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on May 30, 2009 3:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

In 10 gamea

Let’s be fair at least.

by Brendan Scolari on Jun 9, 2009 2:15 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

*games

Oops, let’s spell right too. ;-)

by Brendan Scolari on Jun 9, 2009 2:16 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think your grades have been pretty spot on

At WR we have so much promising young talent that a C is uncalled for.

We have a top 5 back in my humble opinion so I personally think a B could be argued as being a low grade for the Niners RB position.

And although I understand why people are low on the Niners Qb’s, I still agree with you in that I don’t believe they deserve a C. Hill is 7-3 as a starter with a ~90 Qb rating. He may lack arm strength, but he gets the job done. Is he ideal in terms of what you look for in a Qb? Absolutely not. But given his production, you can’t knock the guy too much (as of yet).

Anyways, keep up the good work Fooch. I think you’re doing a very good and accurate report of the Niners.

by Calcio365 on May 29, 2009 7:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Off-topic. Did anyone see Sando's power rankings?

They’re here: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/powerranking?season=2009&week=0

This might make a good post to kick this around during the current drought. It kinda ticked me off, considered that they have the Niners at… #26 in the league, with both the Cardinals and Seahawks above them. As well as the Packers (6-10), the Bengals (4-11-1) and the Jaguars (5-11).

I’ve been pretty realistic about the Niners’ potential ever since the roster was dismantled a half dozen years ago. This year they look really, really improved. Is the rest of the world just overlooking the team or are they actually as improved as they appear to be?

by Bob On The Coast on May 29, 2009 7:16 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

post

I had actually been thinking of posting something about it tomorrow or Saturday. Definitely worth discussing.

by Fooch on May 29, 2009 7:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think that

People give crap to the 9ers because we the best team in the 80s and one of the top teams if not the top team in the 90s. Now that we have had some bad years, people want to hate on us because we were so good. I wasn’t old enough to know, but im pretty sure after the 5th super bowl nobody said any crap about the 9ers because there wasn’t really anything to be said. With the pats, everybody just calls them cheaters. I think we have a legit roster. People do overlook us because we don’t have a star QB. Even if we had like a Kyle Orton or Kerry Collins they would still be hating. People just like to hate. I think we have some talent and have a shot at the playoffs even if we lose the first playoff game, we can still make it.

by iaalexeeff on May 29, 2009 7:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

In '94 they said . . .

We were the best team money could buy. There was some open resent to our owner willing to do whatever it took to win. Most people still hated the Cowboys more, both players and fans were unprecedentedly obnoxious (at least the ones that didn’t jump onto the bandwagon).

by bignerd on May 29, 2009 8:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe the Packers..

But the Bengals?
For gods sake!

Are those ratings based on the QB position alone?

by chikmagnet_565 on May 29, 2009 10:09 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

Seahawks fan

Think they are the greatest thing since sliced bread. Just because they had won the division a few times and made a super bowl run. Im not scared of Housh.

by iaalexeeff on May 29, 2009 7:17 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Seahawks fans are pretty nice, for the most part.

I have been to Seattle 4 times and SF twice to see 49ers/Seahawks games (I live in Portland). My experience has been that Niner fans treat Hawk fans much worse than they have ever treated me.

The cake is a lie.

by Sultan of Seitan on May 29, 2009 8:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

the ones i have encountered

Have been jerks. Saying every negative possible thing about the 9ers. But that is the internet for you. I didn’t mean to say all seahawks fans are jerks, just everyone that have I had to deal with on the internet. I definitely like the seahawks more than the rams and cards. But man, these jerseys are uggglee
http://www.pastapadre.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/seahawksgreenjerseys1.jpg

by iaalexeeff on May 29, 2009 11:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ha, I think they are cool.

Regarding the internet, everyone is an asshole on the internet. Forums seem to be about pissing each other off.

The cake is a lie.

by Sultan of Seitan on May 30, 2009 1:37 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

the wrs.

Good grade I think a b is fair, we won’t know for sure until the season starts.

by bmcrae83@yahoo.com on May 29, 2009 9:59 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

party right

we won’t really know until the season is about half, if not completely over.

by Bezekira on Jun 1, 2009 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A B Grade

is appropriate for Shaun Hill. His passer rating was better than Eli Manning, Roethlisberger, Cutler, McNabb, Delhomme, Bulger, and a whole lot more . . .

Kezarvet

by kezarvet on Jun 1, 2009 6:08 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Are you saying,

that you would not trade Hill for Manning, Roethlisberger, Cutler or McNabb?

Seneca Wallace was also ahead of all those guys, and I’d make the trade in a heartbeat.

by Mind of no mind on Jun 1, 2009 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

:rolleyes:....

That’s about as lazy as post as you can get.

Well, we're waiting....

by drummer on Jun 1, 2009 11:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The question was not about trading Hill . . .

it was about his rating as B. Until his 7-3 record gets blemished or until he proves otherwise, Shaun Hill has made the most of his time on the field, and, no, I would not trade him for any of those guys at this time. The Niners have put together an offense that is talented and deep and only requires a solid QB with good management skills that makes few mistakes. That is Shaun Hill.

Kezarvet

by kezarvet on Jun 2, 2009 8:11 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

It's not 'his record'.

I don’t understand why you insist on saying so. And you can’t possibly be serious about rather having Hill over any of the listed QBs. Even when you factor in age (Hill is nearly 30), any one of those QBs are better and likely will remain better in the immediate years.

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Jun 2, 2009 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

"Was it over when the Germans bombed Peal Harbor???" ...

Forget it, kezarvet is rolling.

Well, we're waiting....

by drummer on Jun 2, 2009 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am saying that

in a Jimmy Raye system that takes full advantage of his players’ talents (did you notice that Michael Robinson was on the receiving end of several long passes during OTAs?), one that emphasizes play action and slant passes and a power running game inside the tackles, I’ll take Shaun HIll in a heartbeat. He won’t try to exceed his abilities and his poise and presence inspires his teammates. His age is perfect. He’s now 30, a man, mature, tough and confident. There are so many intangibles that people fail to consider. Shaun’s agenda isn’t to be All this or All that, it’s to win. He’s the perfect team player.

Kezarvet

by kezarvet on Jun 2, 2009 1:24 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"We'll see them again in the playoffs." -- Coach Mike Singletary after a gut-wrenching week 3 loss to the Vikings.
Start posting about the 49ers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dave_small
Week 11 Prediction Games
Howtheyscoredcat_small
Official Alex Smith [Over]Reaction Thread: Bears Edition
Small
Alex Smith vs Aaron Rodgers(updated)
Small
The Titans/Niners play-by-play
Dave_small
Week 10 Prediction Games

Recent FanPosts

Small
10 things the 49ers should not do
Italian_flag_small
Still think the Niners will reach the playoffs???
2305d0d49c908218_small
Packers fan with some questions
49ers_small
I have a feeling about this particular road game
Joe_and_bill_small
49ers QB - 2010
Small
Jimmy Raye - Ken Whisenhunt
Small
Niners Nation hits the big time
Shaun_hill_small
SINGLETARY WAS HIRED BECAUSE OF SHAUN HILL !!
Howtheyscoredcat_small
Week 10 Prediction Games: The Riveting Results

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Mobile Live
Garrett Wolfe Out For the Year (Updated)
Mobile Live
Friday Notes: Lions Place Stephen Peterman on IR, Sign Eric Fowler
Mobile Live
Well, Isn't That Special (Teams)?

SPONSORS


Head Ball Coach

Dave_small Fooch

Editors

Jerry_rice_small ProfessorBigelow

Assistant Coaches

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

Pixies_logo_small Florida Danny

M_12a62905a0324d2da2f43ddaf62c630f_small Ninjames

Duct_tape_bandit_small Josh from Hollywood

Crab_tree_small briandean

Moderators

Jackalope_card_small wjackalope