49ers Power Rankings: The 10 most important players for 2009
Last week I stumbled across an interesting article completely unrelated to the 49ers. A writer for the Seattle Times put together a ranking of the 15 most important Seahawks for the 2009 season. Matt Hasselbeck topped the list, followed by Patrick Kerney, Walter Jones and TJ Houshmandzadeh. I can see how those four might be your most important guys.
After reading the article, I thought, why not come up with our own list. I decided to go with just 10 guys because there will be plenty of consternation on just that short a list. When considering "importance," I look at these players as the guys the 49ers need to step up to a certain level for the 49ers to have success this year (we won't even begin to try and define "success").
I went back and forth on what to do with the offensive line: Do I list each guys individually, or go with the unit as a whole? I chose the latter. As great as Joe Staley might be, how useful is it if the entire right side of the line goes down in a heap? Fell free to argue counter to that.
No matter what, I would imagine it would be pretty unlikely anybody will agree 100% with my rankings. Looking at them, I already have my doubts. Each time I go through the list I move a man up or down.
1. Offensive line: There are plenty of important areas, but if the Jimmy Raye offense is what we think it might be, the offensive line will be key. They'll need to give Hill/Smith time to make plays, and they'll need to break up some daylight for Frank Gore.
2. Frank Gore: Frank the Tank has three straight thousand yard seasons, but the last two have been a bit of a struggle. If the offensive line steps up, maybe we'll see Frank get back to his 2006 form.
3. Manny Lawson: We know Parys Haralson is a player as a pass rusher. He needs to show consistency, but we know the pass rush ability is there in some sense. Man-Law? The 49ers need him to step up as a legit pass rushing threat if they're going to shake things up this season. He's been utilized in a variety of roles, but in 2009 he appears to be getting his chance to show his pass rushing skills.
4. 49ers QB: Given that Hill and Smith could both see starting snaps at some point this season, I'm considering them both together. I do think the QB will be important, but I think not quite on the level of Frank Gore in the Raye offense.
5. Vernon Davis: Why the Duke over any of the receivers? His combination of size and athleticism have people pondering the numerous possibilities. The 49ers receivers each have specific roles, but Vernon Davis' ability lends itself to virtually any type of route. He can burn a man deep, he can make use his speed and size on short passes, and of course he can even come flying out of the backfield on a swing pass or some such play. While the 49ers can be successful without a huge receiving contribution from Davis, a solid/strong year from Davis will do wonders for the offense.
The second half of the list, with some concluding thoughts is after the jump.
6. Dashon Goldson: Why so high for the injury-prone free safety? Because if he can stay healthy, this training camp playmaker could give them a ballhawk in centerfield, the likes which they haven't seen in yeeeeaaaarrrrssss. If the pass rush struggles, or if one of the two corners has a tough year, that kind of free safety would be huge.
7. Patrick Willis: I honestly had no idea where to put him on this list. We know he's a beast. However, even with all his success, the 49ers have still struggled. He's going to get his numbers and he's going to be a playmaker on defense. It makes him important, but definitely not the most important player on the team. Any thoughts on where Bamm Bamm belongs on this list?
8. Justin Smith: See Willis above. As long as Smith can continue drawing double and triple teams at times, the defense might actually be able to generate some consistent heat on the quarterback. However, like Bamm Bamm, he'll be solid whether the 49ers win or lose.
9. Josh Morgan: The young receiver was blowing things up in training camp before a staph infection started an injury plagued rookie regular season. When healthy (in pre AND regular season), Morgan showed some serious play-making skills, most notably on that game winning touchdown against the Rams. If one receiver is going to step up this season, I think Moran will be that guy.
10. Isaac Sopoaga: Why the guy who could reasonably be considered a relative disappointment? Well, at this point it sounds like Kentwan Balmer will be starting the season as his backup. I'd like to see Balmer break out in training camp and take the left defensive end starting spot, but I'd expect that later in the season, if at all this year. So, if Sopoaga is going to be manning the LDE, he needs to step up and give this team a viable defensive threat opposite Justin Smith. Whichever OLB is coming off the left side will need their defensive end occupying bodies. Initially, Sopoaga better be that guy.
There are obviously a lot of guys left off this list. Guys like Nate Clements and Dre Bly are going to be important. Moran Norris will be important to the success of Frank Gore. Aubrayo Franklin? Yea, he'll be an important cog in the defensive front. I had to make some judgment calls and these ten are what remain. One problem I did have is that my definition of "most important" probably changed for some of these guys. I'm thinking that at the end of training camp we'll come up with a revised top 10 list once we know the general starting lineup.
So, feel free to critique my rankings and offer your own suggestions. Any egregious misses on my part?
1 recs |
26 comments
|
Comments
I think Gore...
should probably be lower on the list. This isn’t in any way a slight to him, but along the same lines of Smith and Willis, he’s been fairly consistent with his yearly production. He’s racked up three straight 1000 yard seasons, in spite of mediocre line play. You pretty much know what you’re getting with him over the course of a season. But the QB play and Lawson’s emergence as a quality pass rusher are vital if this team wants to make it back to the postseason.
by CraftyLefty2126 on Jun 30, 2009 8:14 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I have a problem...
with ranking the ‘importance’ of each player. Football is the ultimate team sport, everyone has to do their job. What good is it if Clements and Bly can cover all day and the nickleback gets burned? I think that’s why Fooch you’re moving players around and not sold on your rankings; if one player fails it doesn’t matter how well the others perform. So I guess maybe we should start with the weakest link. Who’s more likely to blow it?
by shulkdog on Jun 30, 2009 8:42 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
yeah, but still
Look, I’m a big proponent of the fact that there’s no success that isn’t team success. But the importance of the coverage ability of Dre Bly/Tarell Brown goes down in the rankings if Manny Lawson and Parys Haralson are turning the corner like Dwight Freeney. I think Ten-Man’s questions (below) about the criteria used when determining the order of the rankings are very pertinent here.
Morgan breaks through in 2009!
by grantmp on Jun 30, 2009 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
All true...
and you can turn that around and say the coverage becomes more important if Manny and Parys can’t get to the QB. It’s a catch 22. I remember Madden said it all starts in the trenches. So I’d have to put more weight towards the O-line and D-line/pass rush. One could also make the argument that the leaders and captains are the most important; if they perform and elevate their game others will follow.
by shulkdog on Jun 30, 2009 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Depends how you look at it...
If the list is just based on guys the 49ers need to step up the quality of their play for them to have a very successful season, then I’m looking at your list agreeing with most of it. But if we are looking at it from a view point of guys we can’t afford to have injuries to or a drop in the quality/quantity of their play then I would have to disagree with the order. In that case I think our stars would have to be 1st and foremost in the list, starting with Willis, and then Gore. In my Opinion, a drop in production/quality with either one would severely hurt our chances at success! With that mindset this list could be totally re-arranged.
by Ten-Man on Jun 30, 2009 8:49 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree with this...
As far as our stars go, we rely on Gore and Willis as our stars.
I would actually put the O-Line 1st, and QB play second, then Gore a little less down the line here. The ability to have a consistent signal caller who can make plays with his arm will be crucial for the success for Frank the Tank. If you have a QB that can make those accurate passes, it should (in theory), spread the defense out a little more, instead of crowding the line in anticipation of the ball being given to him.
This is where the play of the O-Line comes in. If they can hold the line for the QB to actually throw the ball, then I’m completely confident in Alex Smith AND Shaun Hill making plays for us. If you can get good play out of the line and QB, then Gore won’t have to work so hard, yet, having the defense spread out, he’ll maybe be able to break off some big runs.
Last, I also like our RB backups. I think we have some quality players here to help Gore take a breather here and there…. which is crucial towards the end of the season, and playoffs.
by aBulldog on Jun 30, 2009 9:59 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Boo
Moran Norris should make the top ten.
MURS for President!!!!!!!
by jtoj on Jun 30, 2009 9:58 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Football is the ultimate team game
but if I were making a list, I’d put Norris in there. Having him out there flattening linebackers and corners is something to behold.
by Bob On The Coast on Jun 30, 2009 7:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Patrick Willis should automatically be #1.
He’s arguably the only elite player on the 49ers, and if he even plays at a slightly above average level and not consistently spectacular, that defense is going to be bad.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Jun 30, 2009 10:08 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Really?
because the most important position in a 3-4 is an ILB? So if P-Willy plays average, the whole defense will suck? give me a break. Patrick Willis has been playing phenominal football since entering the NFL, and it hasn’t made or broken the defense. While its nice having the best MLB in the league, he’s not the key to success.
Having a ball-hawking safety is more important, so is an edge pass rusher and NT in a 3-4. To say that our entire defense rests on our ILB is hilarious. I’m not saying Willis isn’t the best player we have, but if he plays slightly above average, as you put it, that won’t make the defense bad. Patrick Willis is our intimidator in the middle, but he’s not the entire reason the defense succeeds or fails.
The man beast has bailed the team out a few times (see INT for a TD against Seattle), and brings many skills that a lot of players don’t have. However, he’s not going to be the reason the defense is bad, if he’s “not consistenly spectacular”. I appreciate fans trying to be civil, and participate in divisional rivals discussions, but please, can it be a little more insightful?
by Andrew Davidson on Jun 30, 2009 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
importance
Of course, he could play spectacular (as he’s done the last two years) and the team could still be bad. However, if Manny Lawson is able to develop into a legit pass rush threat, alongside a continually awesome Bamm Bamm, the odds of the defense improving would be much higher.
by Fooch on Jun 30, 2009 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
My rankings top 10
1. Marvel Smith- or starting RT
2. Manny Lawson
3. DE on Manny’s side- I think Harlason is on Smith’s side and Smith is a beast
4. V Davis- if the offense is TE friendly he really needs to step up!!
5. Dashon Goldson
6. Parys Haralson- gotta be consistent and was just extended
7. Dre Bly- We Need TO’s
8. Morgan/Crabtree- whoever starts the most games
9. Gore- very dependable that’s why he’s so low
10. Glen Coffee- If he’s the Goaline Back we need big things from the rookie
9. A Franklin- most important part of the 3-4
aka Optimist Prime 09...........9ers (site decorum)
by rlott#42 on Jun 30, 2009 11:33 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Meant to move Gore off the list
aka Optimist Prime 09...........9ers (site decorum)
by rlott#42 on Jun 30, 2009 11:33 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Her's my top ten list.
1. Marvel Smith – as the RT goes this year, so goes the OL. If Smith stays healthy and plays to his ability, the OL will be great; if he goes down early, there will be problems.
2. Manny Lawson – he gets his chance to be a pass rusher this year and if he succeeds and gives the team a respectable PR, the pass defense should improve considerably. If not, we should reduce our expectations. The pass rush is critical.
3. Dashon Golson – for the same reasons Fooch has. We need a playmaker there.
4. Shaun Hill – the QB is the most important player on offense; if he succeeds, the offense succeeds.
5. Josh Morgan – a respectable WR corps that keeps opposing safeties in the defensive secondary will help all aspects of the offense.
6. Frank Gore – if Frank has a good season, it’s likely the OL is playing well and defenses aren’t able to key on him so much.
7. Vernon Davis – given his athletic abilities, not using VD as an offensive weapon is almost a crime against football, but VD must produce to make the offense complete.
8.Terrell Brown – with Walt down for the season, someone needs to step up and carry that load. Brown has the opportunity to capture and keep that CB job and we’re all hoping he will.
9. Aubrayo Franklin – if Franklin can improve and play a little more 2-gap, it will give the team a solid right front.
10. Kentwan Balmer – he needs to step up and take over the LDE starter position, which would help both the pass rush and run defense.
by MontanaPass on Jun 30, 2009 11:35 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
as far as importance, um, wouldn’t the qb need to be first? especially since it’s such a weak position for us. shaun hill should be #1. without him (or alex smith) playing well it won’t matter if everyone else plays perfect every game.
"There is no pressure. Pressure only exists when you're not prepared."
-The Samurai
by redrum21225 on Jun 30, 2009 12:49 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
What about Mike Singletary
Does he have to have a good year? Do you remember the clock management debacle? I know everybody is all excited about him, but when I read his “notebook” on 9ers website, sometimes I just get the feeling IQ wise, we’re not dealing with a mastermind. I mean W. did make it all the way to POTUS… If Mike doesn’t have a good year, we could be in deep dookie… I don’t know about importance, but it would be “nice” if Crabtrizzle had a good year. As well as RJF, McKillop, VD, Dashon, Manny, Willis, The Bear, SHill, and A. Smith… Can’t wait for pre-season. Longest effen month of the year…
by dartdart on Jun 30, 2009 2:28 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Isaac Bruce?
Is there a case for Bruce to be higher? There’s a general lack of receivers on these lists – Morgan makes Fooch’s, but some of the others don’t have any wide-outs at all, so maybe they are less important than other positions. But if we were to have some representation from the WR core on the list, could you argue that Bruce is arguably our top receiver for another year only until he probably steps down, and as well as leading the charge himself, will also be instrumental to the development of Morgan, Crabtree, Jason Hill, Zeigler, etc, therefore making himself of overall significant importance?
by LondonNiner on Jun 30, 2009 11:44 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Bruce is possibly a bench player this year
He’s far from crucial.
Don't sweat it. I'm illiterate.
by methodrampage on Jul 1, 2009 3:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Except for Crabtree we have essentially
the same receiving corp as we did last year including Bruce. Bruce was our best clutch receiver last year so if Crabtree is not able to get the job done ( injury, rookie mistakes, etc) then Bruce will absolutely have to step up to the plate and perform. I would hope that this is not the case and that Morgan, Hill, Jones, Ziegle have grate sucess. the point Londoniner makes abouit Brues roll as mentor is valid. In any event I am also hoping that the running game will be much improved this year will allow the receivers to be more effective..
by WC-Ninerhead on Jul 1, 2009 4:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep, that was the point ...
… I was trying to make, that Bruce’s (probably) last season in football could end up being fundamental to the future success of Michael Crabtree, Josh Morgan and Jason Hill, who will hopefully provide the bedrock for the receiver core for years to come. But I definitely also take WC-Ninerhead’s point that the running game will have more of an impact this year anyway. Hopefully Brandon Jones can also, like Bruce, help the younger ones along a bit and aid their development.
by LondonNiner on Jul 2, 2009 12:30 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
from Maiocco's blog
in re: to Bruce’s leadership skills.
Receiver Isaac Bruce is a reluctant leader. He takes his job very seriously, for sure. But he is a loner. I’m not sure I can envision him standing up and saying what’s on his mind. Bruce does not pal around with the younger receivers. Heck, there are a lot of times he doesn’t even stand next to them on the practice field. But if the youngsters pay attention to how he runs routes, and they pick their spots to ask him questions, I’m sure he has a lot of knowledge to share. In that context, Bruce is a leader.
and in his 4th season, VD broke through the wall, Niners fan rejoiced and all was well in the kingdom. Singletary 3:42
by 49erLou on Jul 2, 2009 1:37 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Interesting ...
… thanks for posting 49erLou. You’d certainly like to think the older guys will help the younger ones along, although I realise their primary purpose is not as coaches! Bruce is one, even if, as Matt says, it’s silently (as everything with Isaac seems to be!) Maybe Damon Heard can help Shaun Hill and Alex Smith … then again, maybe not …
by LondonNiner on Jul 2, 2009 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bruce
has always been pretty quiet with interviews and things as well. I remember reading a Maiocco interview with him and all of his answers were pretty short and not very telling. If the young guys watch how he works and how he behaves, it can definitely have an impact, but it sounds like it’s on them.
and in his 4th season, VD broke through the wall, Niners fan rejoiced and all was well in the kingdom. Singletary 3:42
by 49erLou on Jul 3, 2009 12:03 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is unfortunate
however it may be that he expects those who want to learn to his leadership will be through example rather than hands on teaching.. Either way we have much to look forward this year… CAN’T WAIT…
TEE IT UP
by WC-Ninerhead on Jul 2, 2009 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Glen Coffee
My prediction is that Glen Coffee will be a bonafide star in the NFL. This guy is a great running back and he is going to suprise alot of NFL defenses.
by alpenamike on Jul 1, 2009 2:31 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 





















