49ers minicamp positional updates - Kentwan Balmer and Aubrayo Franklin
The last few days has seen a variety of quotes from coaches that would seem to offer some indication as to what we can expect from certain players. Obviously it's tough to predict performance, but we can certainly develop certain expectations in the meantime. The two players in this discussion are related in their impact on the 49ers defense.
The first player is not all that surprising. Defensive coordinator Greg Manusky has indicated that Aubrayo Franklin was the starter at nose tackle, with Isaac Sopoaga and Kentwan Balmer getting some practice as backups there. Manusky indicated his thoughts on a nose tackle "philosophy:"
"I think across the board you always want to have a backup player. You don’t want any letdown coming when said player gets hurt or gets dinged up. So, we always have rotations across the board, and with Kentwan [Balmer] and Isaac [Sopoaga] doing a great job behind Aubrayo [Franklin], just from a backup situation, the more players that you have at those positions helps you out."
I know most people here recognize the job that Franklin did last year, but for those that don't, he was really quite solid. His first season was less than stellar, but once they got the right system around him, he succeeded. Whether it's the right system for the 49ers is a question to be answered this year, but it's certainly better than having a useless bum up at nose tackle. Either way, Franklin will be the man anchoring the middle of the defensive line in a role that is quite essential to the success of the 3-4 defense.
The other player, and the one I wanted to get some more discussion on, is Kentwan Balmer. The 49ers 2008 first round pick did not do much of anything last season. In fact, he had almost as many kick returns (as an up man) as he did tackles. Not exactly a great stat. Manusky had some interesting comments on the development of young defensive linemen (in discussing Ricky Jean-Francois):
"I think the hardest position coming in as a rookie is a defensive linemen because it’s all technique – not so much the calls, but more technique. It happens so fast and so quick. Just to relate two guys we have on our team, from Ray McDonald, from his first year to his second year, the improvement he made. Kentwan Balmer, from last year to this year. And they keep on getting better. So, he will. He’s trying."
Although there has been plenty of another news to discuss in the mainstream media, there were two SJ Mercury News articles discussing Kentwan Balmer: one in Dan Brown's blog and one by Ann Killion. Balmer has definitely been a guy held up as evidence against Scot McCloughan, even if it's only been one season. In discussing Balmer, Singletary had a variety of interesting comments:
On his first scouting report on Balmer: "’Very raw?’ That was an understatement,’’ Singletary said, shaking his head. "You kind of look at him and you think, ‘Man, OK. I’m waiting."
Late in 2008: "Toward the end of last season, I’m telling you, I can understand what Scot (McCloughan) saw in him because he has a heck of a package and a lot of ability," Singletary said. "I’m very excited about him."
Now: "Kentwan is one of those guys I'm very excited about," Mike Singletary said. "He's made great strides in his maturity and development.
Fortunately Balmer is not oblivious to his struggles:
"My first impression in the NFL was not the impression I wanted . . . You can never make up for lost time," he said. "I've got to make people forget about that first impression."
Given that Franklin is penciled in pretty firmly as the starting nose tackle, Balmer's best chance to break out will be on the end opposite Justin Smith. It's tough to make any predictions given that we have so little from last season to base said predictions on. Of course, that's never stopped us before, so feel free to throw out your two cents on Kentwan Balmer. Given that he's only been in the league for one season, and given the potential early struggles of many defensive linemen, will Kentwan Balmer be able to step up this year?
0 recs |
27 comments
|
Comments
Manusky listed the starters in a 3-4
defense as:
RDE – Smith
NT – Franklin
JDE – Sopoaga
Kezarvet
by kezarvet on Jun 8, 2009 9:20 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Franklin is backup talent at NT. Soapanna is better and much more stout there and much stronger. But we should have drafted or picked up a real huge beast at the NT position. Maybe later this year Soap will become THAT guy ? But you are right,Franklin did play better in the new scheme that Manusky put in after Nolan was canned. But he can never really be a proper NT in a 3-4 defense. Adequate ,yes.
by TOP_CAT on Jun 8, 2009 9:27 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Franklin is a backup, but Sopoaga isn't the answer, either.
I think most of us here understand that the only reason Franklin “improved” the second half of last season was that he was allowed to “1-gap” and be a penetrator instead of what a normal 3-4 NT does, which is to play 2-gap and hold the point against double teams. And, as many will also recall, Soap spent his first contract years attempting to take over the NT position and failed. Why? Because he is not very good at shedding blocks and tackling the runner on either side of the C, which is the NT’s job in a 3-4. That’s why he was moved to LDE after signing his new contract.
I’m afraid this team has no true 3-4 NT on the roster, and along with the CB position, is the team’s biggest “need” position for next year’s draft. Let’s hope McCloughan sees enough in Terrance “Mount” Cody (Alabama) to draft him next year. Other good candidates might be Dan Williams(Tenn) and Boo Robinson(Wake Forrest). But the NT position is ripe for an upgrade, imho.
by MontanaPass on Jun 8, 2009 11:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is 2009.
Focus, man. We’re about to begin what may be our new version of 1981 and you’re mentioning some college clowns who probably will never be Niners. Actually, Manusky will rotate the 3-4 and the 4-2, moving Soap alongside Franklin in the 4-3. When we are in a 3-4, I expect the NT to mainly be playing a 1-gap defense. Franklin is actually very good in that role. Place Soap next to him when we play 4-3, and that’s about 650 lbs in the middle. That ain’t small. Soap has looked very good at LDE in OTAs.
Kezarvet
by kezarvet on Jun 8, 2009 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
4-man fronts
If the 49ers keep Franklin in on four man fronts, Manusky is doing something terribly wrong. The 49ers are already lining up Haralson and Lawson/McDonald on the ends. That leaves Sopoaga, Balmer, Franklin, and Smith for the two inside spots. I don’t know about you, but Smith is almost a lock for one of those spots. If you’re looking for a pass rush (which is what the 49ers will be doing in 4-man fronts), Sopoaga is definitely a better option than Franklin. Heck, based on Singletary’s excitement, Balmer may prove to be a better option than Franklin on the inside on 4-man fronts. Franklin’s only use is really as the 3-4 NT, because he has the most discipline out of the three potential players there.
In any case, the 49ers are probably almost NEVER going to be a in 4-3. Part of the reason why the defense “improved” toward the end of last season is because Manusky (and Singletary) dropped the 4-3 out of the equation.
by sfgfan on Jun 8, 2009 1:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
4-man front line-up
I listed the Niners 4-man fronts on plays when they got sacks when I wrote this piece: http://www.ninersnation.com/2009/5/19/879797/niners-sack-tracker-2008
What I noticed was that in Nickel and Dime situations, Franklin was never in the game. He’s always swapped out and McDonald and Smith were at the DT positions. And if the defense improved after the team switched to a straight 3-4, why would the team go back?
Morgan breaks through in 2009!
by grantmp on Jun 8, 2009 2:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rotation
Franklin, Aubrayo 6’1" 317 NT (1)
Balmer, Kentwan 6’5" 315 DT, NT(rotation)?
McDonald, Ray 6’3" 290 DT
Sopoaga, Isaac 6’2" 330 NT(2 & rotation), DT
Smith, Justin 6’4" 285 DT (1RT)
I like the idea of J. Smith settling in at the right side. It seems to me that Manusky is trying to get more rotation at the nose and left side. Size and strength changes throughout the game should be effective. It may allow us to wear down the interior.
Might Balmer rotate in at NT particularly late in the game? Smith is a handful by himself. Perhaps a strong rotation would work just as well for the rest of the defensive front. It certainly would give opposing lines more to think about.
by goatfather on Jun 8, 2009 9:48 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
In 1984
we rotated nine defensive linemen and nobody could touch our DL. We literally wore everyone out. I guess that happens when you rotate Dwaine Board, Michael Carter, Fred Dean, Gary “Big Hands” Johnson, Manu Tuiasosopo, Lawrence Pillers, Jim Stuckey, Jeff Stover and Louie Kelcher.
That ’s why Michael Robinson is SO important to this team. Yesterday, Raye said:
“It’s important that we do because the way I have to look at Sunday and the 53-man roster and who can go to the game and when you are playing receiver, fullback and tight end, that is all involved," Raye said. "So if you are available to play multiple positions and multiple spots along with the special teams competition, it enhances your chances of going to the game on Sunday."
WR, FB, TE? Sounds like MRob. By counting on Robinson in emergencies to be WR #6, FB #2, TE #4, plus wildcat QB and special teams captain, the Niners can pencil him in on their 53-man roster as if he were 3 or 4 different men. That gives them the luxury of carrying an extra DL, CB, or LB, or all of the above.
I’d love to see the five you have listed above as well as Frenchy in the rotation. We rotated nine back then — how about seven now?
Kezarvet
by kezarvet on Jun 8, 2009 1:21 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
You're talking about things of the past.
The 49ers, if I’m not mistaken, haven’t carried more than 7 linemen on their 53-man in the past handful of years (talent level isn’t much different than it is this year), let alone carrying seven on the active-48. Don’t want to say it’s impossible, but it’s extremely unlikely.
by sfgfan on Jun 8, 2009 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
1984-what a lineup
Hey kezarvet,
That is one hell of a sweet group of names from 84. If we had another Carter and Dean WOW. Not sure that any of the guys we have today fit that mold but if we can get close. I remember when Walsh signed Carter there was some buzz that he was a great athlete but doubts about his ability to play the NFL.. Not sure if any of the younger members know that he was the Olympic Silver Medalist in the Shot Put in (84 ?)
by WC-Ninerhead on Jun 8, 2009 2:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Coaches didn't seem to be enthrawled with RJF
I was thinking about putting him in the rotation, but I feel that the way the manusky talked about him made him seem more like a project. But maybe by seasons end, I mean who knows how fast players will develop under sing.
by goatfather on Jun 9, 2009 9:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Of course
He’s a project…he’s a 7th round pick, you can’t expect him to start playing right away.
by chikmagnet_565 on Jun 9, 2009 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
right
it was about why he’s not in my rotaion
by goatfather on Jun 9, 2009 6:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wilfork
I say we trade Franklin and a 2nd rounder for Vince Wilfork and sign him to an extension.
The Pats can use Franklin for the season, and let him re-sign with the 49ers next year as Wilfork’s backup.
Good deal to me.
by Andrew Davidson on Jun 8, 2009 2:02 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Not too mention he worked out with Smith in the offseason
So hopefully something rubbed off on Balmer. he has the size and lacks the technique, we need someone to step up in the DE spot opposite Smith so Lawson can feast on QB’s.
M. S. #50
by rlott#42 on Jun 8, 2009 4:05 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Ray McDonald
Really improved in his second season….It’s all technique, let’s hope that Balmer gets it down.
by chikmagnet_565 on Jun 8, 2009 8:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Man, I didn’t know Soaps weighed 330, it would be perfect to have him slot in at NT, and honestly I’m still not really sure why that experiment didn’t work before. But Balmer has ideal size for a 3-4 end, Soaps has good size for a 3-4 NT, and we have plenty of people to rotate
Also known to haunt as theghostoftravisdenker and theaccidentalghostofsergioromo.
by theghostofjasonellison on Jun 9, 2009 8:43 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Size...
… and strength aren’t everything. The NT, especially a 2-gapping NT, requires a certain mindset. Unselfish, as well as patient. Sopoaga has failed to show that he can be patient, as coaches see him more as a penetrating force. That mindset is better utilized at the ends.
by sfgfan on Jun 9, 2009 10:36 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Have you confirmed this,
I remember hearing this a while back when Nolan switched soaps to the DE. I was just wondering if you had for yourself confirmed this to be true?
by goatfather on Jun 9, 2009 6:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
How would I confirm it...
… other than what McCloughan and Nolan have previously said? If you don’t value Nolan’s opinion, then okay, lets scrap it. However, McCloughan has also said before the Sopoaga is a guy who works better in space, which is why they want him at LDE. It is still why he’s at LDE, even though they are trying to get him more reps behind Franklin.
by sfgfan on Jun 10, 2009 9:04 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The tape
Just wondering if you had noticed yourself that he was impatient and selfish when watching the actual games? I have not seen a detailed analysis of his play done by a secondary source.
by goatfather on Jun 10, 2009 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ah.
Well, my memory is sometimes good and other times an utter FAIL. However, I do remember seeing him as more of a penetrating type, who likes to be in the backfield (much like Marques Douglas was during his last year with the 49ers). Of course, Sopoaga’s tools are perfect for that type of a role. With him and Justin Smith in the middle on 4-man lines, the 49ers could have a very disruptive force there.
by sfgfan on Jun 10, 2009 2:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Balmer not playing inside.
Yesterday there was an article talking about how Balmer is too small for the NT position.
That would seem to indicate that the D- Line will look like this
RDE – MacDonald\Balmer
NT – Franklin\Soaps
LDE – J. Smith\Evans
And ya know that’s pretty damn good.
by goatfather on Jun 12, 2009 7:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't see...
… McDonald taking significant snaps away from Sopoaga at DE. McDonald is good for some cheap pass rush ability, but the anchor the run, I think Sopoaga is the better fit at DE. Sopoaga is going to be a busy man this year, if he plays where the team is envisioning him playing: DE on most base packages, and backing up at NT to give Franklin a breather.
by sfgfan on Jun 12, 2009 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sopoaga
is an amazing athlete. He was a rugby star, played basketball and baseball. He can dunk a basketball. In high school, he played fullback and safety, at 285. Since he has been timed as the fastest defensive lineman off the ball, I would love to see him in the old Guy McIntyre role of fullback inside the 5 yard line. He could function as the lead blocker or carry the ball himself.
Kezarvet
by kezarvet on Jun 11, 2009 9:12 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 























