2009 Roster Projections: Safeties
The safety position has seen a fair amount of turmoil this offseason ranging from the waiving of Jimmy Williams to the injury issues already arising, most notably Reggie Smith. Smith was drafted as a cornerback but has officially made the switch to the safety, even with the injury to Walt Harris. The 49ers secondary has numerous depth issues, but there is a good chance they could be resolved by Week 1. Of course, things could get especially ugly too, so can't get too high or too low I suppose. Up to this point we've discussed wide receivers, cornerbacks, offensive line, running backs, defensive line, and quarterbacks.
Locks
Dashon Goldson, Michael Lewis, Reggie Smith
Bubble
Mark Roman, Curtis Taylor, Lewis Baker
I've bounced back and forth on Mark Roman. I started with him on the bubble, moved him to locks and just moved him back to the bubble. I took a look at some late 2008 depth charts and it could make for a very interesting decision in a couple months. Although players bounce back and forth, the general rule of thumb was 6 corners and 4 safeties on the roster. After injuries, the six corners were usually Clements, Harris, Hudson, Strickland, T. Brown and R. Smith. The four safeties were usually Roman, M. Lewis, K. Lewis and Goldson when healthy.
Right now, if you look at the cornerback picture (replacing Harris with Bly), Smith might end up getting utilized all over the place given his "relative" versatility. If that were the case, it would make sense to keep a fifth safety. Looking at the CBs for a brief moment, barring a signing in the coming months (always a possibility), it seems like this might be the most realistic option for the 49ers. Then they keep Roman and Taylor and that's that.
However, if the team decides to have Reggie Smith only play safety, and assuming everyone stays healthy (a big if), then it seems like Mark Roman and Curtis Taylor will end up battling for a single 53-man roster spot, doesn't it? Taylor can go on the practice squad, so there is an option available to keep both within the organization. However, in regards to the 53-man, is there much wiggle room there?
In regards to the poll, I'm not asking who will end up with more first team playing time. Just who will be on the field with the defense more, not including special teams play.
0 recs |
24 comments
|
Comments
I get the impression that Taylor is Raw
If DGold is back there “making plays” on the ball on the majority of downs, it would make sense to me that on downs where DGold is not in the game Roman would be in there because of his experience. This would be a nice balance between a conservative and a play making secondary.
by goatfather on Jun 9, 2009 8:41 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Roman
As much as it would pain a lot of fans, I think Roman is pretty much a lock. As it stands, I remember reading last week that he’s probably the #1 backup at both safety spots. I doubt that he will get those kind of reps just so the team can cut him.
by sfgfan on Jun 9, 2009 10:37 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Woah
Its exactly 50% to 50% right now! 95 votes on either side! Dang.
by Poundtherock on Jun 9, 2009 11:26 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Unbelievable
It seems to me that people are voting with their hearts and not with their heads. Sure it’d be great if Taylor would step in and if we could kick Roman to the curb—but Taylor is a 7th-rounder! It’s not like he’s a Taylor Mays-type prospect. I think it’s more likely that Taylor will be practice-squadded than that he’ll have more PT than Roman this season. I was expecting that Taylor would have maybe 30% of the vote—at the most—‘realistically’ more like 15-20%.
Morgan breaks through in 2009!
by grantmp on Jun 9, 2009 12:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Taylor
I voted for him because I hate Mark Roman.
Pizza is the best. Also, go 9ers!
by iaalexeeff on Jun 9, 2009 2:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
That’s exactly
what grantmp was saying.
by musketeer54 on Jun 9, 2009 3:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Most people hate Mark Roman
I voted for Taylor as well…..
I really, really hate Roman….
by chikmagnet_565 on Jun 9, 2009 4:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think roman sucks
i dont think i know
vote nate davis as holder of the 49ers future
message has been approved by the davis party and nate davis himself
by big beaner on Jun 9, 2009 8:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree.
Roman is the #1 backup in both spots so how on earth is Taylor gonna get more reps than Roman? I know we hate Roman (I do only cuz no turnovers, however he is still decent) but he is a 4 year starter with Niners. Taylor was a few picks from being an UDFA and yet you guys think he will get more playing time than Roman?
by hudd07 on Jun 9, 2009 3:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I also agree
I voted Roman. Although I dont like him, I want the best player to get more playing time. I can bear him as long as he doesnt do anything crazy.
by Poundtherock on Jun 9, 2009 6:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He doesn't do anything
And that’s the problem.
by chikmagnet_565 on Jun 9, 2009 9:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Another Trend Noticed
So far three articles have late round picks Ricky Jean-Francois, Nate Davis and Curtis Taylor making the 53 man squad over proven veterans.
Let me recap:
Ricky Jean-Francois > Ray McDonald
Nate Davis > Damon Huard
Curtis Taylor > Mark Roman
. . . not by the longest of all freaking long shots!
You have to ask yourself, are any of these 5th round picks or lower going to have an awesome to camp to supplant a veteran? In each case, it’s a resounding no. None of these guys are ready to play in the NFL for 2009. These guys are all practice players. The veterans are all making the 53 man roster because they can play in the NFL today (McDonald if not on IR).
by bignerd on Jun 9, 2009 3:07 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
exactly
I read somewhere (I know those 3 words should keep me from posting right there ;-) but…) that the Rookies spend a LOT of the first camps just learning where they are meeting for weights, food, where classrooms for film study are, etc….I mean talk about shell shock yet you think a 7th rounder will supplant a starter that has been in that defense 3 years. I mean you guys forget that Roman has been wearing the headset.
by hudd07 on Jun 9, 2009 3:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
?
RJF over McDonald?
That’s just crazy…unless McDonald isn’t fully recovered.
But Nate Davis over Huard is pretty obvious
by chikmagnet_565 on Jun 9, 2009 4:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Crazy
RJF only makes the roster if McDonald lands himself on IR or the PUP list. If he’s on the PUP, the 49ers will have a hard time figuring out where to stash RJF when it comes time to activate McDonald.
by sfgfan on Jun 9, 2009 4:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Practice Squad?
I don’t think he’d get picked up off the squad.
by chikmagnet_565 on Jun 9, 2009 5:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It depends.
If RJF takes over for McDonald and actually gets to play (while McDonald is on the PUP list), other teams have film on him. If he’s even remotely decent, another team in need of some depth (i.e. a defensive linemen gets injured) would probably take a look at a young and cheap defensive linemen who may have promise.
by sfgfan on Jun 10, 2009 9:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
He'll have to fight
To be the back-up behind McDonald.
He would have to unseat Sopoaga and Balmer.
That’s nearly impossible.
by chikmagnet_565 on Jun 10, 2009 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree.
That’s what I meant by originally saying “the 49ers will have a hard time figuring out where to stash him”. They’re going to have to cut him. They’re just going to have to wrestle with themselves if he shows anything at all during the first few weeks of the season.
by sfgfan on Jun 10, 2009 11:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Curtis Taylor
is not on the bubble, he’s a lock. you dont cut Jimmy Eat Williams the day you sign someone else and then not keep that guy either.
and Lewis Baker is also not a bubble guy, but for the opposite reason.
I take full responsibility for my irresponsibility.
by these3words on Jun 10, 2009 6:00 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Coincidence?
You seem to believe that the 49ers cut Williams in favor of Taylor, which I believe is false. The 49ers signed Taylor because he was an intriguing UDFA. UDFAs tend to ride the PS pine. Jimmy Williams was cut because the questions about his work ethic may have been answered (and the answer was wrong).
by sfgfan on Jun 11, 2009 10:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Correction
Taylor was a 7th round pick, not an undrafted free agent. Not exactly a huge difference, but still a difference.
by Fooch on Jun 11, 2009 11:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 























