2009 San Francisco 49ers: Worst Case Scenario
Yesterday we got everybody excited about the crazy potential of the 2009 San Francisco 49ers and what the best case scenario might result in. 11-5 isn't a sexy record, but given where the 49ers have been, I bet any 49er fan would take that in a heartbeat. Of course, just as we had a post for the optimists on the site, so we bounce back with a slam dunk of a potentially ugly reality for the pessimists.
Again, as a reminder, this is a look at a realistic worst case scenario. As with last year, I have not factored injuries into the equation. While a worst case scenario would in fact involve some injuries, injuries are simply too hard to predict. Wear and tear is allowed in this prediction, but not something that knocks a player out for weeks on end, or the entire season. And, I can guarantee you I won't predict an 0-16 record given some of the potential slop on the schedule. As with this morning, feel free to post your own worst case scenario, or critique mine for being too harsh or too easy.
Worst Case Scenario
The QB situation simply does not resolve itself. Shaun Hill wins the job in training camp, but Hill's production in limited opportunities the last two years really does not actually project out to a full season. I actually don't think in a worst case scenario he's exactly god-awful. Rather, defenses are able to game-plan around his limitations and rather than him making stupid mistakes, his mistakes are simply a result of a lack of the necessary talent. Hill finds himself benched before the halfway point of the season and Alex Smith steps back into the saddle...and proceeds to fall on his face. Maybe he has some of the physical tools, but he's just not able to put it all together like an NFL quarterback can do. Of course, the team is not going to throw Nate Davis too the wolves (we hope), so the team struggles behind the Hill/Smith duo, with the two QBs getting second and third chances in the starting lineup.
The rest of the offense is never really able to click behind the less than creative offensive gameplan of Jimmy Raye. Frank Gore and the running game get the chance to control the game, but Gore continues to show signs of wear and tear. He has managed to stay away from catostrophic injuries, but the nicks and bumps and bruises keep him at less than 100% most of the season. In this worst case, he finishes in the 900 yard rushing range, with another 200 or so receiving yards. Glen Coffee gets more and more carries, but shows why he was no better than a third round pick. Behind a struggling offensive line, the running game is not able to develop as hoped and teams can spend less time keying on Frank Gore and more time keying on the 49ers receivers.
Of course, in this worst case scenario, the receivers aren't a huge threat. Isaac Bruce falls off the cliff (figuratively) and is unceremoniously benched for the youth movement. Unfortunately, the youths regress. I think Josh Morgan does show some improvement in year 2, but it's more like a 10-20 catch improvement, and not the big leap many fans are hoping for. Michael Crabtree does get on the playing field and stays healthy, but he really struggles in the move to a more conservative offense. On the quick, short pass routes he gets blasted by bigger, more physical corners, and on the deep routes his speed is not enough for NFL-elite corners. And Vernon Davis? Well, he's still a solid blocker and that's about it.
All of this comes about due to some shoddy work by the offensive line. Marvel Smith's back gives out again and Adam Snyder/Barry Sims clearly are not the answer. Chilo Rachal continues starting but isn't quite able to step up as hoped. I actually think that even in the worst case scenario Eric Heitmann will be perfectly solid for the 49ers. He's 29 and playing as well as can be expected. I'm not concerned about the center position. Other than Heitmann, it's pretty simple figuring out what the worst case scenario is for the 49ers offensive line.
After the jump, we assess the defense and the coaching staff in this worst case scenario, and project out a worst-case record...
Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse, oh it continues...
There are actually a lot of easier predictions to make in this scenario. Manny Lawson will get some sacks just because of the increased opportunities. However, he had 3 this past year, so I'm guessing he shows he's not much more of a pass rusher and finishes with 4 or 5 in a worst case scenario. I have the increased sack total because of the increase in opportunities he'll see outside of the big sub. On the other side, I really don't think Parys Haralson completely drops off in a worst case scenario. Rather, he sees his sack total come down to 6 or 7.
Patrick Willis continues to excel but teams are able to game plan even further around him, helping to take him more out of the picture. This is furthered by Takeo Spikes hitting the veteran wall. I'm thinking a Derek Smith type of wall, only with more trash talk.
As for the secondary, Nate Clements is not able to rebound from last season and struggles even as the #1 guy. On the other side, Bly proves to be a waste of a one-year deal and Tarell Brown just can't unseat him for an every down role. And Shawntae Spencer? I'm tempted to say he gets injured, even in spite of what I mentioned above. However, I'll just say he contributes but clearly doesn't have it in him to be more than a 3rd or 4th corner at best.
Even if Dashon Goldson stays healthy in the worst case, I could see him struggling to make plays on a consistent basis in the regular season. I could see a guy who gets a sack and an interception in one game, but then gets burned for a touchdown and a lon run in another game. His worst case, in my opinion, is inconsistency more than anything. Again, that's assuming he stays healthy. I'm not sure if that worst case leads to his being benched in favor of Mark Roman, who continues to not intercept the ball.
As for Michael Lewis, he's another guy who, even in the worst of times, continues to take care of his business. He might not be a flashy, superstar playmaker, but he takes care of business. Even if the team struggles, I think he'll be fine.
Worst Case Record: 3-13. First off, if some of what Football Outsiders said comes true (specifically about the Rams), it's entirely possible this drops to 2-14. If the 49ers struggle this season, the schedule could prove to be very unforgiving. The wins in this scenario include 1 over Seattle, 1 over St. Louis and 1 over Detroit. That 1 over Seattle could be interchangeable with 1 over Arizona. So consider the worst case a range from 2-14 to 4-12.
I would say Detroit is a guaranteed win, but it's not such a simple proposition. While they did go 0-16 last season, they made enough significant changes that I think they won't be a pushover this season. Of course, if Stafford struggles that might not be the case. Either way, I've got it as a win, but it proves tougher than expected.
Aside from a poor start, the backbreaker would be the 7 games following the bye week. In reality I don't see it happening, but 0-7 is not out of the realm of possibility. If Jacksonville rebounds this season, the AFC South is absolutely stacked in 2009, meaning a particularly bad inter-conference run.
So, to the pessimists AND optimists, stick that in your pipe and smoke it. My personal best case to worst case scenarios feature a 9-game swing. Was I too negative for a worst case? Is it possible I was actually too positive? If you haven't hung yourself in misery yet, feel free to let me know.
41 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Michael Lewis
Worst case scenario he misses a lot of tackles and doesn’t make any big plays…sort of like last year. In my opinion safety is the weakest position on the roster and the 49ers did nothing to address it. I would have really liked to see us draft Patrick Chung or go after Dawkins in free agency. Independent of other factors Coffee seems like a quality pickup but there were bigger needs to address (left guard and safety).
Niners Nation..
“Fair and Balanced”.
Fiesty last paragraph Fooch. I like it.
Well, we're waiting....
I think
Rachal’s worst case scenario will be better than what you have here. I know he’s only entering year 2, but I’m going to say Staley, Heitmann and Rachal are guys we don’t need to worry about. Marvel Smith could indeed cripple out O-Line by going down to injury if Snyder or Sims can’t step up effectively. Either way, having just 3 (arguably 2) solid OL means there is plenty of opportunity for worst case scenario.
Gore, I think gets 1,000 no matter what, worst case scenario. Even if he is averaging <4.0 ypc, and Coffee is ineffective, and defenses are easily shutting down our gameplans. You said 900, so its small potatoes.
That’s the only things I want to put out there, otherwise your worst case scenario seems (unfortunately) possible. I’m not saying it will happen, by but my stretch of the imagination could a 3-13 season happen. And yes, I would cry.
by Andrew Davidson on Jul 24, 2009 10:21 AM PDT reply actions
I'm speechless
This is a scary thing to read, I know is a worst case scenario but I think it was very exaggerated, I wanted to cry just by the thought of having another kind of Nolan season. I really don’t think a worst case scenario for the niners this season would be so drastic as the one mentioned above.
Go niners!
It's definitely possible
Lets hope not.
by Brendan Scolari on Jul 24, 2009 10:21 PM PDT up reply actions
Depth Chart question marks
Shaun Hill – ?/ Alex Smith – ?
Frank Gore – Answered
Moran Norris – ?
Josh Morgan – ?/Isaac Bruce – ?/ Brandon Jones – ? Michael Crabtree – ?
Vernon Davis – ?
Joe Staley – ?
David Bass -?/ Tony Wragge -?
Eric Heitmann – Answered
Chilo Rachal – ?
Marvel Smith – ?
Justin Smith – Answered
Aubrayo Franklin – ?
Isaac Sopoaga – ?/ Kentwon Balmer – ?
Parys Haralson – ?
Patrick Willis – Answered
Takeo Spike – ?
Manny Lawson – ?
Nate Clements – ?
Tarell Brown – ?/ Dry Bly – ?
Dashon Goldson – ?
Michael Lewis – ?
Joe Staley – ?
I think that should be answered
Takeo Spike – ?
This one’s no question either
Nate Clements – ?
Why, because T.O. burned him?
by Andrew Davidson on Jul 24, 2009 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions
No, because Clements gave up the most yardage and passing TDs of any starting cornerback.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Jul 24, 2009 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions
Still trying to find where it says Clements surrendered upwards of 800+ yards by himself,
but you can check here.
“Nate Clements, San Francisco 49ers
Season Totals: 96 attempts, 8.19 YPA, 26.04 Forced INC%, 7 TDs, 2 INTs
My two cents: Not only did Clements have horrible numbers, but he was also second in the league with 17 unforced incompletions. Clements was one TD allowed away from the league lead and only managed two INTs in 96 attempts. Clements has not lived up to the ridiculous contract the 49ers gave him a couple years before. Clements is actually a good CB in short coverage, but is horrible just about everywhere else. If the 49ers can get an actual pass rush Clements could be an average CB."
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Jul 24, 2009 4:23 PM PDT up reply actions
Spikes as fooch pointed out before
could hit the veteran wall.
Staley didn’t have a good year, just a good end of the year. Whether or not he can play at that level for 16 games is unseen.
Clements..what frog said
That was
so depressing. I’m not sure what to do now… maybe I’ll go cry
making people cry
I figured if we’re going with extremes in best and worst case scenario, making folks cry would certainly go to one of those. See, I too can be a negative nancy, a debbie downer, whatever you wanna call me!
by David Fucillo on Jul 24, 2009 11:45 AM PDT up reply actions
Sort of how I see it happening.
Though not as dramatic in terms of players not playing well. I think the 49ers roster won’t blow anyone away, but they won’t look outright miserable like say, Oakland, Detroit, or the 05-07 Niners. I feel they’ll lose, and perhaps lose a lot, but look competitive in several losses. And I think they will sneak out and win a couple they shouldn’t, whether it be by fluke, a team not showing up, or a crazy 4th quarter comeback. But in general, after looking at the schedule, I just can’t see more than 7-9 even if the team improves.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
Sounds pretty realistic
I feel the same way.
by Brendan Scolari on Jul 24, 2009 10:22 PM PDT up reply actions
So that means...
If the best realistic case is 11 wins (we think) and with worst realisit case is 3 wins (we think), doesn’t that mean we’ll probably end up somewhere in the middle? I.e. we think that the team will realistically win somewhere between 6 and 8 games? Just food for thought – I know this isn’t scientific.
Also, I understand that part of the premise of this exercise is not to count injuries. However, injuries to key players happen all the time – just ask the Patriots, Bengals or Seahawks. Whatever you may think of our qbs, if we were to lose Hill and Smith the remaining options would be pretty scary.
Vick?
Sorry had to say it. If Smith and Hill went down with injury we’d pick up an out of work vet, I’m sure Byron Leftwich is keeping in shape somewhere…and you know there’s still one guy out there that thinks Vinnie Testeverde can still play HINT: his initials are VT.
by Johnnysixnut on Jul 24, 2009 12:36 PM PDT up reply actions
Even if he wasn't...
… I think Huard and/or Davis would be a better option than some random FA that hasn’t seen a single page of the playbook.
Worst case scenario..
We’ll lose Singletary as our head coach because of a pathetic 09. Back to mission impossible to find a coach!
Can we stop this blog right here and start talking about good stuff again!!!
Worst Scenario: 10-6. Go Niners.
I don't think the team would make Singletary the scapegoat.
Unless he does some questionable antics in reaction to the losses. If the 49ers struggle mightily this season, it’s clear the team is simply not talented enough to compete yet.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Jul 24, 2009 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions
The Guy on the Hot Seat..
Is McGloughan. If the 49ers tank hard, then he would be the first guy in line. Singletary would have to meltdown in order to get fired, and a meltdown from Singletary has odds in their favor.
Well, we're waiting....
Firing McCloughan...
… could lead to Singletary’s departure, as well. If the Yorks continue with their “hands-off” approach to the football operations side of things, it’s likely they let the next GM choose his own head coach, too.
Who are these people...
…picking 9+ as a worst case scenario? I mean, are you serious??? Even me, the eternal optimist, the guy who thinks Alex Smith is going to blow the doors off this year, thinks 10-6 is BEST case. 14 people are officially loony.z
Hmm
Same people who voted Garcia over Montana and Young?
by David Fucillo on Jul 24, 2009 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions
Polls...
Are these polls only for Registered users, or are they Public? I’ve seen boards list who voted on whom or what. If someone made a dubious vote, you can always point out “So you’re the Guy..”
I think the polls are becoming a bit moot now.
Well, we're waiting....
Public can too, if I recall correctly
And I’m sure this blog gets a ton of traffic every day by non-registered users as well as the regulars.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Jul 24, 2009 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm going to post a worst-case scenario schedule analysis later on today in this thread.
I just posted the best-case one in the Best Case post if anyone wants to check that out.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
throw nate davis to the wolves!
i don’t buy the argument that you can play too early. anyone with the mental toughness to play in the NFL has to be able to learn on the job without their confidence being shattered. if shaun hill goes flat and alex smith proves me right about his general inability to play football, then go ahead and throw nate davis to the wolves and see how he does.
I take full responsibility for my irresponsibility.
i remember alex smith sucking in 2005,
but i fail to see how it made him any worse in the future than he would have been if he’d been left on the bench.
I take full responsibility for my irresponsibility.
hard to assess
I don’t know if he would have been any better or not, but getting the crap kicked out of him his rookie year certainly didn’t help matters.
by David Fucillo on Jul 24, 2009 6:26 PM PDT up reply actions
The one piece of worst case scenario you are forgetting...
is the equivalent in injuries to what we had last year.
Imagine ending the season without your QB, your entire starting O Line, and the most time lost to injury in the league since 1996 or some such. (I can’t find the link on that, sorry.)
We still managed to win 4 games in those trying times, so hawks fans are jazzed that we shouldn’t have that level of bad luck this year— it’s very difficult to be that lucky— or unlucky— either way. But I’ll tell you what— that debacle of a season was very informational from a fan perspective. You always hope all your guys stay healthy— they rarely do. But you never anticipate having that level of injury.
If it happens to you guys, or AZ, expect an absolute best-case scenario of 4 wins given those circumstances. It’s just the way it is…
Hopefully though, all three teams that I see as pretty even, us, you and AZ, have a healthy battle-tested season, prepping whichever team (or teams) make it out of the West to do some playoff damage to the rest of the league…
Please, for the LOVE OF GOD, stop suggesting next year's 1st round pick (or picks) be used for Taylor Mays and or a QB of the future. Let's just let the season unfold, people, and evaluate much deeper in the process!!!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Jul 25, 2009 11:28 AM PDT reply actions
injuries
I mentioned in the article that I wasn’t going to address injuries. I did that because a worst case for injuries could mean almost anything and it would just get ridiculous.
by David Fucillo on Jul 25, 2009 11:35 AM PDT up reply actions
ahh...
my bad, I missed that.
Still, as a Hawk fan I have a hell of a time with the injury factor, because it basically ruined my fall/early winter last year, and suddenly I see injury as death to all things optimistic.
Please, for the LOVE OF GOD, stop suggesting next year's 1st round pick (or picks) be used for Taylor Mays and or a QB of the future. Let's just let the season unfold, people, and evaluate much deeper in the process!!!
by Tyler Jorgensen on Jul 25, 2009 2:49 PM PDT up reply actions
Funny!
How do 11% of the people taking the poll see this worst case scenario ending with 9+ wins! Its great to be optimistic but balance it with a touch of reason! haha
From Humboldt to Torreon Mexico, supporting the A's every night thanks to XM Radio!
by Humboldt2Torreon on Aug 2, 2009 6:55 PM PDT reply actions

by 































