Projecting the 49ers 53-man roster #2
Approximately six weeks ago I rolled out my initial projection of the 49ers 53-man roster. While there is still plenty of preseason football to be played, I thought a couple weeks of training camp and a preseason game is enough time to consider revisions to our 53-man roster projection.
I have to admit that this has gotten really difficult to figure out given some of the injuries and the Michael Crabtree holdout. Brandon Jones is out until early October with his shoulder injury and Zak Keasey is out for 8-10 weeks with his forearm injury. Neither player can go on the PUP list since they passed physicals at the start of training camp. I think that means Keasey is likely to be cut at some point soon and potentially placed on injured reserve if he clears waivers (if I'm getting the rules correct).
Then there's Crabtree. Given his holdout he's still not a member of the 49ers. That basically means we'll come up with a list of 54 players because once Crabtree is signed, he'd have to go on the 53-man roster and somebody would need to be cut. At this point Crabtree is not included in this projection. After the jump we discuss that impact among other things.
Also, I've underlined new additions to the 53-man roster.
Offense
QB (3): Shaun Hill, Alex Smith, Nate Davis
RB (4): Frank Gore, Glen Coffee, Michael Robinson, Kory Sheets
FB (1): Moran Norris
WR (6): Isaac Bruce, Brandon Jones, Josh Morgan, Jason Hill, Arnaz Battle, Dominique Zeigler
TE (3): Vernon Davis, Delanie Walker, Bear Pascoe
LT (2): Joe Staley, Alex Boone
LG (1): David Baas
C (2): Eric Heitmann, Cody Wallace
RG (2): Chilo Rachal, Tony Wragge
RT (2): Adam Snyder, Marvel Smith
Defense
DE (5): Justin Smith, Kentwan Balmer, Demetric Evans, Isaac Sopoaga, Ricky Jean-Francois***
DT (1): Aubrayo Franklin
OLB (4): Manny Lawson, Parys Haralson, Ahmad Brooks, Marques Harris
ILB (4): Patrick Willis, Takeo Spikes, Jeff Ulbrich, Scott McKillop
CB (5): Nate Clements, Dre Bly, Tarell Brown, Shawntae Spencer, Marcus Hudson
FS (2): Dashon Goldson, Mark Roman
SS (2): Michael Lewis, Reggie Smith
Special Teams
K: Joe Nedney
P: Andy Lee
LS: Brian Jennings
KR/PR: Allen Rossum
Last 5 on: Ahmad Brooks, Kory Sheets, Dominique Zeigler, Ricky Jean-Francois, Alex Boone
First 5 off: Jay Moore, Barry Sims Curtis Taylor, Micheal Spurlock, Damon Huard, Brit Miller
***Ray McDonald is on the PUP list and would need a spot on the roster at some point in the season. Replacement TBD
After the jump I take a look at some of the changes and some of the notable omissions. After you've read that over, feel free to tear me a new one on some of these selections.
There are a few players that are giving me all sorts of trouble. Let's start at wide receiver. Once Crabtree signs, who do you cut? The quick thought is to get rid of one of the receivers (either Zeigler or Battle). However, if Crabtree signs before the season starts, or even that first week or two, Brandon Jones will not be back yet. Given that Crabtree has a ton of ground to make up, I don't think you want to cut a guy who's been playing since day 1. So who exactly do you get rid of to make room for Crabtree on the 53-man roster?
Quarterback
I'm a bit conflicted here, but I think it's just that initial rush of a good performance from Damon Huard. If Nate Davis doesn't get much playing time, can the team afford to have him sitting at #3 if they elect to waive Damon Huard? Or is this an indication that Huard isn't going anywhere and they might actually keep 4 QBs? Given the injury issues, can this team afford to give a roster space to a 4th quarterback at this point?
Running Backs
The season ending injury to Thomas Clayton helps Kory Sheets, but doesn't guarantee anything. I kept Sheets on the roster, but I actually am thinking that his real "nemisis" for a roster spot is Micheal Spurlock. Spurlock has shown a good bit of potential and has been getting moved around all over the field, including in the wildcat/taser formation. At this point, I think either Spurlock or Sheets makes the roster, but not both.
Fullback
Close to 2/3 of you think Brit Miller will make the 53-man roster for week 1 of the regular season. I'm not quite comfortable adding him in yet given the presence of Moran Norris and Michael Robinson. At the same time, I've elevated him to first 5 off the roster. Miller will see a whole lot of playing time and if he puts up similar performances in the coming weeks, he might bump somebody off the roster. Who that would be exactly, I'm not so sure.
Offensive Tackle
I succumbed to the pressure and replaced Barry Sims with Alex Boone. Sims did perfectly reasonable in his backup role last week, but consider me on the upside bandwagon of Boone. At this point, I wouldn't be surprised with any outcome in this battle. However, as I said before, it's going to be either Boone or Sims, not both, on the roster.
Miscellaneous
I thought I'd close with a few miscellaneous thoughts on other roster spots. I added in RJF with McDonald on the PUP list, but I think RJF is still in a tenuous position at this point. He'll need to build on last weekend's performance. I moved Jay Moore off my projection, and went with Marques Harris. Harris has experience in the Manusky defense and that veteran presence would likely give him an edge. And Moore retains practice squad eligibility.
0 recs |
47 comments
|
Comments
Practice Squad
Fooch, I’d like to see you add a practice squad list as well. Always an interesting decision since those eligible for it aren’t waived but aren’t protected either.
by Since79 on Aug 18, 2009 8:07 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
good call
I’ll work on that this week. More useful now that games are underway.
As far as eligibility, I believe you have to clear waivers to be placed on the practice squad. I need to clarify that first but I thought a team had to cut the guy, wait for waivers to pass and then assign him. Last year that happened with Brian de la Puenta. The 49ers had signed him, really liked him in camp and wanted to place him on their practice squad, but he was claimed by the Chiefs off waivers.
by Fooch on Aug 18, 2009 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
de la Puente
Scroll down to August 30, 2008:
by Fooch on Aug 18, 2009 8:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is one rule I don't really care for
I think you should be able to designate a certain amount of players, we’ll say five, specifically to your practice squad after the preseason without having to cut them first. I think that is where Nate Davis belongs his first year in the NFL, not the 53-man roster. Singletary has said Huard is there to be the #3 guy, and I don’t really like the thought of 4 QB’s on the roster.
by jonesin25 on Aug 18, 2009 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The rule is done that way to benefit the players. There are few players every year that wouldn’t make the 53-man roster on their current team because of depth at the position but other teams would definitely add to their roster. It wouldn’t be fair to the player to get stuck on the practice squad when he could play for another team.
Watching those Hard Knocks programs teams play a lot of games to protect their practice squad players. They even go so far as to threaten further trade cooperations if one of their practice players is raided by another team during the cut.
by bignerd on Aug 18, 2009 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Spurlock /Sheets
I think we have to keep both. Kory Sheets is the real deal. He’s our burner guy. We don’t have one at RB and need one.
Spurlock is a Wildcat guy, a reverse guy, a Rossum back up, a trick play guy, and would be great upfront on an opponent’s onside kick, for expample. I think he’s just too good to let go.
On the other hand there are some vets that, even though I KNOW they are good special teams players, and that’s important, I just don’t think they’ve shown enough to stick. Such as: Michael Robinson. Love the guy. But he hasn’t shown me anything in two years that really stands out. I think trying to turn him into a RB from a QB hasn’t worked. Spurlock can take his place in the Wildcat. And Sheets can take his place as a RB and give us more dimension. Coffee and Sheets replace what we were trying to use Robinson for in the backfield.
Moore on practice squad makes a lot of sense.
I’d rather see Curtis Taylor make the squad than Roman, just like the choice of keeping Boone over Simms. Upside. And let the kid get some experience. He’s a great athelete and is working hard. He’s going to be a really good NFL player in my opinion. Roman has had it.
I also think Lambert has a shot at making the team, or def should be on the practice squad. I’m trying to look at the best potential players rather than needs at each position. And he is potentially a very good CB. Let’s not let him go.
I don’t think Amhad Brooks looked all that good to me. I also think Battle is someone who would be better off on another team as a veteran but we need to go young and keep a Zeigler or, again, a guy like Spurlock. These guys can blaze and make plays. Battle is more of a workman. Obvioulsy a lot of value in that, and special teams, and blocks downfield. But I just think with the propensity for injuries and not having the same upside potential of some of the younger guys, it’s time to give others a chance and get some fresh blood around.
Finally, my BIG controversial pick. I KNOW some will agree just on emotion, and some will disagree, and logically so. But I would keep Hurd and say goodbye to Alex Smith. I have seen a lot of Alex and I know a bit about his game personality, and his teammate relationships. I also think, and I know he was rusty, he played badly on Saturday. I didn’t see anything that compared him positively to Hill. And I just think he, like Battle, would be better off trying to get a fresh start on a new team. Maybe we’d even get a sixth round pick to trade him? Get his salary off the books. Etc. And I think Huard would be a better back up knowing that that’s clearly his role. Then the QB situation would be clear, everyone at the position would know his role, and I think Hill would play better knowing he was the guy no questions asked. Then we keep Davis. And let’s give him a chance to play against the Raiders — I mean actually pass the ball.
Lastly, I don’t know how we make room, or put him on the pracice squad, but I thought Khalif Mitchell looked like a presence at nose tackle later in the game. He was playing against back ups but he was one huge wall in there and I’d like to give him a shot.
by Since79 on Aug 18, 2009 9:03 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Good run-down, Since79; here's my assessment
Sheets: yes, I think we keep him, since a) Coffee seems ill-suited to a 3rd-down back role, b) Robinson is pretty useless as a RB but somehow untouchable, and c) Sheets has uncommon burst and seems like a guy who would be snapped up before he got to the Practice Squad.
Spurlock: I liked what I saw, but with Battle being “the Rock of the WR corps” (not a direct quote, but not far off), he likely won’t make the team. Too bad.
Moore: ‘Squadded
Lambert: was always around the ball when he was in there…but he was in there with the 3rd stringers
Taylor: he’ll never make the team over Roman. He’ll hopefully be ‘Squadded, though.
Brooks: seems like a lock to me just because we’re short at OLB.
A. Smith: count me among those who disagree with you fundamentally on Smith’s future with the team. I think I’d rather see Davis ‘Squadded (unless anyone else has heard rumors that another team would want to pick him up) and Huard on the team as the 3rd QB.
Mitchell: I loved what this guy did in the 1st preseason game. Looks like a real beast on the interior—an actual NT rather than a 4-3 DT with a few extra pounds. I’d love to see him ’Squadded.
Morgan breaks through in 2009!
by grantmp on Aug 18, 2009 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Co-sign Robinson thought, but....
I couldn’t agree with you more on the Robinson comment, despite the fact that he’s a great special teams guy, we need a guy like sheets that’s explosive…But losing Alex smith doesn’t make any sense, the chances of a starting QB going down are about 50/50 and I’d take smith as my backup over Huard any day. Plus we’ve already invested so much into him it’d be nice to finally see a return. Look at a guy like Drew Brees who was considered a bust after the first few years of his career, then the light finally came on. I still have faith that the light will come on for smith one day soon.
by Jay-skee on Aug 18, 2009 11:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was nodding in agreement until...
the Alex Smith comment… I know we all have our say about this issue but Smith is better than Huard any day of the week. Smith has had 7 OC in one team, Huard has stayed with one system more than one year even if he has been with several different teams. We can’t overlook this apparent and overly discussed comparison.
WR: My thoughts on WR are similar I would think Battle would be the odd man out. Spurlock stays until Crabtree signs. If Battle provides veteran leadership, why was Bruce brought in?
RB/FB: I also think Robinson’s production or lack there of will not help him earn a spot. I’d keep Miller as a backup FB and special teams contributor. He was a LB in college, so I figure special teams would be a “feel at home” position. I saw better production from Miller last game than I have from Keasey in the last 2 years.
DL/LB: I like Mitchell’s motor, I think he would be a great back up and change of pace for Franklin. I also liked Moore’s play last friday, he impressed me on how much havoc and pressure he created from that DE or was it OLB position, not sure. Ulbrich should be cut plain and simple… I have not seen him make a tackle in the last 2 years… he usually jumps in the pile or assists others with tackles. PLEASE KEEP AN EYE ON HIM THIS PRESEASON… HE JUMPS ON PILES and NEVER MAKES A PLAY
DB: No to Roman and yes to Taylor’s development. I think Reggie Smith is a good back up for both safety positions and it’ll be good for Taylor to work and learn this year and compete with Goldson, Lewis and Smith for those starting positions next year. I also liked Lambert… If we don’t see Spencer do anything noteworthy this preseason I can’t imagine the team keeping him around, so either Lambert or Word-Daniels would get a look.
Joe and Steve were under the same system for years... don't expect Smith to be super so soon.
by bayboy on Aug 18, 2009 1:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
im surprised..
to see that Curtis Taylor wasnt one of the first 5 left off
by 49er4life on Aug 18, 2009 9:34 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
given Reggie Smith’s experience at corner, I wouldn’t be surprised if he served as backup SS and the 5th corner (and if it reached a point where so many guys got hurt that the 5th corner had to start, we could sign somebody) and allow Curtis Taylor to stay on the team.
I was surprised he wasn’t one of the first 5 left off either, alot of people think he’s got a decent amount of talent
by Vote4Gore on Aug 18, 2009 9:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
my bad
In mixing players around I think I overlooked him on that last 5 left off. I’d probably replace Barry Sims. While Sims has a good chance of making the roster, if the 49ers go with Boone, it’s not like Sims gets on over somebody else alongside Boone. I’ll make that correction. Good heads-up
by Fooch on Aug 18, 2009 10:08 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
other than that....
i think your projections are almost bang-on. If/when Crabtree signs, can we put Brandon Jones on the PUP list to free up a roster spot till he’s back? If not I expect Battle to be cut loose as Zeigler is more likely to be that deep threat to replace Jones for the time being. The only other question mark I see is Marques Harris, if Moore can continue to improve his cover skills he may squeak onto the roster.
by 49er4life on Aug 18, 2009 10:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jones
No on Jones. Once a player passes a physical to start training camp (which Jones did), they can’t go on the PUP list. So basically he’s dead weight on the roster and will be one of the inactive people each week until he’s healthy.
As far as Zeigler, I don’t know if he’s really that deep threat at this point. He’s got great hands and I see him as a more short/intermediate threat with Morgan getting more deep balls.
by Fooch on Aug 18, 2009 10:47 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If they sign Craptree, is there a chance the niners cut Jones altogether? I think they signed him before the Draft, when the Niners thought they had no chance at Crabtree, but with Crabtree, Bruce and Morgan, and the plethora of other talent at WR…. do the Niners need to keep Jones? It would kind of be a dick move though… like someone who asks a chick to the Prom, then tells her the day before that he can’t take her because the hottest cheerleader decided to go with him instead.
by aBulldog on Aug 18, 2009 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No they wont do that
They signed Jones to a nice contract, cutting him wont make since, plus they think he will be a big contributer on O. The good thing is he got hurt the first week of preseason, so hopefully he will be back by at least week 4 of the season. Not to big of a loss if he comes back healthy.
by jonesin25 on Aug 18, 2009 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So what is your logic for leaving Miller out?
I realize this is a work in progress and will change from week to week and with the exception of Miller I agree with this version.
by WC-Ninerhead on Aug 18, 2009 10:13 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
You just don't keep 3 FBs on the team
by chikmagnet_565 on Aug 18, 2009 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who do you think the 2nd fullback is?
by jonesin25 on Aug 18, 2009 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
number crunch
Like chikmagnet said, it’s just a numbers game unfortunately. Norris will be starting so Miller won’t be getting much playing time anyways.
by Fooch on Aug 18, 2009 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Only situation I can see him getting onto the team is if Norris AND MRob go down with injury. Remember, he’s an UDFA and a converted LB. The Niners could’ve lined up Joe Staley at FB and he would’ve picked up those 2 TDs.
Morgan breaks through in 2009!
by grantmp on Aug 18, 2009 11:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Both TDs?
I know Joe Staley is pretty fast for a lineman, but could he have really outran the Denver defense for 40 yds?
Either way, Miller will probably be PS’d and will be available in case one of the FBs suffers an injury
by chikmagnet_565 on Aug 18, 2009 3:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
There’s just not enough room for 2 Fullbacks, 4 RB’s and 3 tightends on this team. Brit is a work in progress still and if he doesn’t make the team, can hopefully be put on the practice squad. If they really needed another fullback on the team, they could probably use Pascoe in an emergency role, or one of the other RB’s. If this team is going to be a running team, I think that the fullback position is going to be one of those “hidden” keys to success… and by hidden, I mean they’ll be one of those unsung hero’s who help pave the way for Gore and the other RB’s.
Anyways, I’m digging Brit Miller and his upside. Didn’t he play Linebacker in college? Get’s moved to FB and make’s two TD catches? Yeah, it’s just a preseason game, but the upside is now there. He could be a diamond in the rough.
I don’t see them keeping Sheets, Robinson and Brit Miller… one of those guys won’t make the team. Miller might make it to the practice squad, and might be better served there for the time being.
by aBulldog on Aug 18, 2009 11:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Francois and Davis can both be placed on the practice squad and i see Huard making it as the 3rd string QB. I also don’t see us carrying 4RB’s and just one FB so i would replace Millers with Sheets who could also be placed on the practice squad. This of course with the belief that Francois, Davis and Sheets would be protected and another team couldn’t pick them up.
by nocal81 on Aug 18, 2009 11:36 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I heard Singletary on KNBR this morning, and it sounded like he was really impressed with RJF. I think he makes the team. I also don’t see us carrying 4 RB’s. I think Robinson or Sheets goes, and either Miller takes that spot, or someone else like Spurlock.
by aBulldog on Aug 18, 2009 11:53 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
OH, I forgot to say that I doubt they let Sheets go. He’s the ideal compliment for Gore and Coffee.
by aBulldog on Aug 18, 2009 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
RJF
Will probably stay on the team until Ray McD comes back.
He’ll probably be waived after that (and then immediately PS’d)
Robinson is pretty much a lock to make the team, I agree with Fooch in that it will come down to Spurlock vs. Sheets
by chikmagnet_565 on Aug 18, 2009 3:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Keep Sheets off the Streets
Gotta keep ’em. The guys is going to be a stud.
And we have to keep Spurlock, he’s a spark plug guy that can change the momentum of a game. You don’t find many of them.
by Since79 on Aug 18, 2009 12:14 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I see things a little differently.
QB – I think the team only keeps three, and the real contest is between A. Smith and Nate Davis for the “developmental QB” role. If Smith fails to show significant progress over his previous performances, why keep him? Huard showed he can play the backup role, so if Davis shows more promise than Smith, why not trade/release Smith and keep the three that fit?
RB – Robinson looks like the primary wildcat player and backup at FB, so he stays and Miller doesn’t. Gore and Coffee make it, as does Norris. Sheets makes it as one of the last five.
WR – Here’s the surprise – Jason Hill gets cut to make room when Crabtree is signed. Battle, Morgan, and Jones can all play the slot. I know Hill is a Sacred Heart local favorite, but he gets injured a lot and his speed doesn’t show in games. Morgan, Jones, Battle, Zeigler, and Bruce are all keepers. Spurlock? If we only keep three QBs, he makes it on versatility.
OL – Sims goes, Boone stays, but as RT backup. M. Smith becomes the primary LT/RT backup because he’s played both positions at a high level. Boone doesn’t have the feet to play LT, so Snyder would be the emergency LT with Boone stepping in at RT. I would cut Cody Wallace for getting tossed around by Khalif Mitchell(and everyone else), but I’m not the coach so he stays.
DL – Same as Fooch. I also wish there was room for potential NT Khalif Mitchell, but he goes to the practice squad for development.
ILB – Agree with Fooch..
OLB – Lawson, Haralson, Ahmad Brooks, and Jay Moore over M. Harris, Moore appears to be having a good camp but needs to show up in the preseason games.
Safeties – Same as Fooch.
CBs – same as Fooch, no surprises there.
So, basically, A. Smith and J. Hill are shown the door and we keep Moore and Spurlock, with Crabtree taking the final spot. Of course, injuries will make all this obsolete in about three weeks.
by MontanaPass on Aug 18, 2009 12:27 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
they
are not cutting alex smith. you are delusional
by save10 on Aug 18, 2009 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Of course
If they really were interested in getting rid of him they could trade him for draft picks instead of cutting him. I bet they could get a 3rd/4th round pick for Smith. His contract is very friendly and he is decent bet at that price. If he works out you have starter, if not you lose a mild pick.
by bignerd on Aug 18, 2009 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
They could get something in a trade.
If J.T. O’Sullivan can find a home in the NFL, so can Alex Smith. But probably only as a backup. But if Smith can’t show some serious improvement in the next three games, why should the 9ers keep him when roster spots are at a premium?
by MontanaPass on Aug 18, 2009 6:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
m robinson
I am new to the site, but love all the banter. Some people are forgetting that M Robinson lines up at fullback more than he does at running back. So in essense, he is the back-up fullback. You don’t keep a guy on the 53 man roster to play fullback when he was just converted from linebacker. The practice squard is perfect for this guy. Go 9ers!
by 9erfaninFL on Aug 18, 2009 12:37 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Based on camp so far
Last 5 on: Ahmad Brooks (almost a lock), Micheal Spurlock, Damon Huard (I think the team guaranteed him a spot), Dominique Zeigler . . . ok I am missing one.
First 5 off: Jay Moore, Barry Sims, Nate Davis*, Curtis Taylor*, Alex Boone*, Brit Miller, Kory Sheet*, Jason Hill, Ricky Jean-Francois*
- Practice Squad
I think the last spot on the roster comes down to Nate Davis or Barry Sims. If the team thinks they can hide Davis on the practice squad than he off the 53-man. If Alex Boone looks competent enough to play tackle they cut Sims and stash Boone initially on the practice squad. If they can stash both Davis and Boone on practice squad they might keep RJF, Moore and maybe even Sheets on the 53-man.
Spurlock will the make the roster. Based on how he performs with the opportunity he might take Battle, Zeigler or Rossum’s (remote possiblity if Spurlock impresses) spot when Crabtree signs.
From everything I’ve read Jason Hill has yet to impress in camp. Considering everyone else including Spurlock have had their flashes I think he is toast unless he steps it up the next 3 weeks.
by bignerd on Aug 18, 2009 12:49 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Will Smith hold off Huard for the backup job ? We all know Huard is the better player and can move the offense better and more consistently. If the golden boy smith is looked at with an unbiased eye (Sing) will he even make the final roster ? Maybe they think Smith can backup Davis for the next decade ,if Smith improves a great deal ?
by TOP_CAT on Aug 18, 2009 3:11 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
*sigh*
You are impressed with Huard because he did OK against the Bronco’s 3rd string Defense?
For god’s sake, he practically walked into a D-lineman’s hands on one play!
by chikmagnet_565 on Aug 18, 2009 3:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
…And they simply cannot “hide” players like Davis on the PS. They must go through waivers BEFORE they go to the PS and then ,even after that,any team can grab them off the PS anytime during the year. With a player like Davis ,there may be several teams who now need (as the Niners do) a QB of the future prospect,that would gladly take Davis as their 3rd stringer. It would be a HUGE mistake to place Davis on waivers and then if he passed through,onto the PS. Davis is simply the ONLY player on the roster now that has any hope of being that franchise QB of the future,that might strongly lead this team for a decade or more.Davis has every tool and intangeble you could ever ask for in a QB,if he translates those tools into the NFL well,he will be a great one indeed ! But if we chance the PS with him,it might be for another team.
by TOP_CAT on Aug 18, 2009 3:18 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
No,I am impressed with Huard over Smith because Huard has proven himself over a long career to be a qualified NFL caliber QB,not great but certainly better than anything smith has ever shown. Hill is bettert than both and Davis is not yet ready,but should be better by far than all of them,but not for a year or maybe two (or maybe never ,no guarantees).. That should leave smith as the odd man out but then Huard is pretty old and they might want to keep smith around ,just in case he improves a great deal and gets up to backup talent level some day.In that case he could backup Davis for a long time .
by TOP_CAT on Aug 18, 2009 3:22 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think if we can put Brit Miller on the PS then we should
Because he is still learning FB. I don’t remember him blocking. Was he fine at blocking? He could be a future FB if we keep him. I and am still not a fan of Michael Robinson. I would rather have Spurlock. Spurlock is faster, can return punts and kickoffs, can be the “wildcat” position just as Robinson and IMO is more explosive. I know Robinson can play FB but I don’t he is that good at fullback. I know he contributes on special teams but when Rossum when down for a while last year we were horrible at kickoff punt returns. Im still not sold on Robinson
Go 49ers
by iaalexeeff on Aug 18, 2009 3:29 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Does arnez Battle have any trade value?
I think we should trade the guys we dont need for future draft picks
by dalien82 on Aug 18, 2009 4:00 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Probably not
He is a limited backup WR and every team knows he is on the boarder of being cut anyways. He’d probably find a team to stick to if cut because of his special teams play, but no one will knock on the 49ers door.
by bignerd on Aug 18, 2009 4:39 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Joy of the Niners has been hampered since Alex Smith was drafted (albeit for other causes too); I think he got one touchdown, in the final game, in his first year. Even since then his presence has been divisive with little upside except potential year after year. I hope that we escape from purgatory finally and waive him if he again performs as he did last week. This wasn’t the “the plan” going into the preseason, but the team suddenly has a surfeit of talent. Alas, it won’t happen and the GM will again lose courage, despite the recommendation of the Coach to move on finally.
Smith can come back after he’s cut by his next team.
Jason Hill gets cut too. Brit Miller is good practice squad material.
Niners look great this year!
by Vertigo on Aug 18, 2009 5:55 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 





















