49ers Right Tackle options
The retirement of Marvel Smith naturally brought a lot of consternation as to what the 49ers might do to shore up the now thin offensive line. The team has their 5 starters, but there are big questions at the backup offensive tackle position. Adam Snyder missed Saturday's game due to a knee injury, but is expected to be fine coming opening day. However, he has yet to prove himself as a consistent force at the right tackle position, so depth is certainly a necessity.
The 49ers currently sit with Barry Sims and Alex Boone as their primary offensive tackle backups. Beyond that they have guys like Jacob Bender, Joe Toledo and Matt Spanos. A week ago they had no prayer of making the roster. Today they've certainly got a chance, although I still don't see them making the roster. I'd imagine we've heard all we need to hear about Barry Sims. He's old and lost many steps in his game. He was pretty atrocious last year, but one has to wonder how much of that was due to his aging and how much was due to the Martz offense. Any thoughts on that?
The other man is of course fan favorite Alex Boone. Boone has shown some skills and could very well end up being a player in this league. One would imagine the retirement of Smith has come pretty close to locking up a spot on the roster for Boone. Many would argue that it's way too soon to expect much out of him other than as an emergency fill-in. I would tend to agree with that, although we all have heard his draft story. He has talent and would have been drafted if not for his off the field problems.
No matter who you take from the above mentioned offensive tackles, I wouldn't exactly call it an awe-inspiring group at this point. Certainly some upside, but a whole lot of "rough around the edges."
So where does that leave us? Well, potentially in need of another offensive tackle. Adam Caplan of Scout.com developed an updated list of best free agents still available on offense. After the jump we break down some of the more intriguing options from that list. We also utilize an older list from February.
Jon Runyan
This is definitely my favorite option at this point. Runyan had microfracture surgery at the end of January, which was expected to keep him out four to six months. Well, as of a few days ago, Runyan was cleared for full contact. Back in February Caplan had an interesting comment about Runyan:
This mauling type of lineman is nearing the end of a solid 13-year career. Despite playing in a passing offense, Runyan actually may be a better fit for a team that uses a power running game.
Well, ya don't say? Of course, before we get ahead of ourselves, both sides would have to want this to happen. Runyan was drafted by the Oilers/Titans, but spent the majority of his career in Philly. Would he be interesting in coming to the West Coast? Adam Snyder is currently the starter at right tackle, but we know that's not a sure thing. The team could ease Runyan back into things and if Snyder falters, Runyan could pounce on the job. I'm not holding my breath for this to happen, but I am definitely intrigued by the possibility.
Mark Tauscher
The big problem for Tauscher is his recovery from ACL surgery. There were reports that his knee was in pretty bad shape, but the last report I could find (end of July) indicated his rehab was running ahead of schedule, and he could be ready for game action in September. Obviously take that with a grain of salt, but again, this is a guy the 49ers could ease back into the swing of things.
Charles Spencer
Spencer generally was considered a solid talent before going down with what sounds like a pretty nasty compound leg fracture. He tried out for the Giants in May, but nothing ever came of that. Spencer recently signed with the UFL so he's certainly looking to make a comeback. As is the case with most everybody still available, plenty of injury baggage. At one point he was going to be Houston's left tackle of the future, so the talent level was certainly there at one point.
Jason Fabini
Fabini is generally considered a serviceable backup at this point in his career who can play 3 positions (right tackle and I think both guard positions). Of course, he's 35 years old so I wouldn't expect the 49ers would do much in terms of kicking the tires.
Levi Jones
The 49ers have denied interest in Jones, but I'll throw him on here anyways. Jones is certainly talented, but it sounds like he wants a starting job and that won't happen at this point in San Francisco.
I refuse to list the two former 49ers that are on Caplan's list.
There are numerous other offensive tackles on their last legs that I certainly could have included. For now though, I think this list includes the most pertinent options at the position.
In general, injuries are the overriding concern with any of the offensive tackles available. I'm curious how one views knee injuries as compared to back injuries. Do we have any old offensive linemen who would be able to provide us with some insight? I ask because people might complain about bringing in another injured free agent tackle, but maybe a knee injury can be worked around a little more than a back injury. Any thoughts?
0 recs |
65 comments
|
Comments
Kwame Harris
I have NO problem with Kwame Harris coming back. He’s young, healthy, experienced enough. And if I recall he had a nasty attitude and was said to be a better run blocker than pass blocker. I’m not saying a permanent fix. But the season starts in two weeks, and he could help us get through the next couple years.
The other thing I would say is we should try to trade Alex Smith to a team looking for a project quarterback, in exchange for a lineman.
There has been a recurring thread about Singletary and Raye that they put people in places they can excel, if anyone can get anything out of Kwame Harris, I think it is those two.
They're called RUNS for a reason.
by connie mack on Aug 31, 2009 7:45 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Harris is a turnstall at tackle
I’m surprised no one has signed him to be a guard ala Leonard Davis. In space he’s bad, but he’s a mauler, would be a really good guard with help on both sides for pass protecting
by Dave R. on Aug 31, 2009 7:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would have no problem with
bringing him in as the #1 backup guard and the #2 or #3 backup RT. However, he can’t start at RT or even be the #1 backup tackle. He is, as Dave so rightly points out, a [site decorum] turnstile.
by kiyoshi on Aug 31, 2009 10:33 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And don't forget...
A penalty magnet. Say this for the backups this preseason they’ve mostly avoided holds and false starts.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Aug 31, 2009 11:56 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No [site decorum] Way
I will be very, very, very upset if Kwame Harris ended up back on this team. I celebrated the day he left.
Never forget: I am a complete idiot
by Exhibit G on Aug 31, 2009 10:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I not only celebrated when he left....
..I rejoiced when he ended up on the RAY DUHS! LOL!!
But seriously, we should go with the rookies, at least they have a chance to get better. Sims is close to worthless and any talk of Harris returning is voodoo. Lets give Boone a chance to perform.
Another year, another chance to hope for the team !!
by FaStRmAn on Aug 31, 2009 6:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL, no you didn't

Kwame Harris prior to giving up an offensive holding call on a 49ers 60 yard touchdown pass.
by bignerd on Aug 31, 2009 10:48 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
CAPTION
Even Kwame Harris can’t stand the sight of his play.
by kiyoshi on Aug 31, 2009 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just noticed
It’s not holding penalty, he’s grabbing the face mask instead.
by bignerd on Aug 31, 2009 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And here we are AGAIN!
Here we are again, in need of a tackle! Just imagine how we would be right now if we had drafted a tackle instead of Clowntree! Just like all the faithful Niner fans asked the management to do before the draft. So we have to live another year out with a sub-par offensive line. Man, we have all the ingredients just not at right tackle. As for the other positions on the OL I think we are set! Maybe we could trade for one of the first round picks we have, we certainly can’t afford to have both anyways! These rookies make way to much before they are proven NFL players!
by SushiDivers on Aug 31, 2009 7:52 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Wouda coulda shoulda
Lets deal with the NOW and reality. The Niners need a solid backup guard. There seems to be a few that could fit the bill depending on their overall health. I beieve the Niner will be watching the waiver wire and perhaps take a Tackle/Guard type and a Pass rusher type in the supplemental cut loose draft…
Another year, another chance to hope for the team !!
by FaStRmAn on Aug 31, 2009 9:04 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Another option...
With the Colts getting some minor scares in the backup QB department we could talk with them about the recently downgraded Tony Ugoh. This would be interesting since the pick they got him with was one they got from us.
by 9erEast on Aug 31, 2009 8:31 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Lack of good options
While there’s a need for a veteran RT, I don’t see anyone worth while on that list. Again, another injured old Pro, Alas, another Jennings and Marvel. I wold rather keep Toledo, Bender and Spano than Simms. There’s a better chance of them playing better than Simms..Synder may be alright for now as long as he stays healthy. We should have drafted one with the picks we traded away last year. I’m wondering what we could get if we traded one of the 1st rounders. I don’t think we can recoup the two picks we lost last year.
We also have to consider a center as well. Heitmann been a solid player for years but he’s also getting long in the tooth. So next year draft should be considered," The year of the Linemen ", both Offensively and Defensively. That’s our Achilles Heel !
One thing about lineman. Even though a LT is the most valuable of the five, RT is considered the 2nd best . So go get one and lets anchor this line for years. No more pussy-footing around by MGT!
by LASVEGASNINER on Aug 31, 2009 8:37 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
?
Heitman is our best O-lineman and he doesn’t seem to be declining.
And I personally think Center is more important than Right Tackle.
by chikmagnet_565 on Aug 31, 2009 10:13 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And I personally think Center is more important than Right Tackle.
That’s because it is. The primary reason, in my opinion, that RT sucks up so much money is because teams put their failed LTs at RT.
by sfgfan on Aug 31, 2009 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or maybe because defenses are pitting speed rushers against them.
If all we wanted was a run blocker, Kwame Harris would do. But unfortunately, pass rushers come from both sides these days, and a DE/OLB penetrating on the right side can be a real disaster for a QB, as we’ve seen the last few years. The RT must be able to pass protect almost as well as a LT. That’s why Kwame “feet of stone” Harris was such a failure.
Adam Snyder has not yet proved he can defend against the pass rush well enough to keep the starting spot. Sims was a disaster last year and I really doubt he’s going to be better one year later. Of the players on Fooch’s list, I could go with John Runyan, but that’s about it – the rest make me nervous. Ideally, McClo will trade that extra 1st we have next year for a promising rookie or 2nd-year OT who can also play LT and then let Snyder back up LT if Staley is injured and either Boone or the new guy at RT. Hopefully the new guy will be ready for backup duty at LT before the end of the season.
McCloughan has put the team in this spot by refusing to meet the need for an OT for three straight years except through gambles with injured players. He could have drafted Phil Loadholt in the 2nd this last draft instead of cutting a questionable deal with Carolina(look at the Seattle trade for comparison). He needs to repair this situation decisively, and by decisively I mean bringing in someone who can play at a high level for the next 10 years, like Joe Staley.
by MontanaPass on Aug 31, 2009 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pitting..
… rushers on RT’s, while becoming more commonplace is still a pretty big risk. Considering the TE usually lines up next to RT, he should be able to chip the DE or at least limit his path to the backfield, even if he’s not staying in to block.
by sfgfan on Aug 31, 2009 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Snyder had 9.5 sacks allowed and Sims had 10.5 sacks allowed.
That’s twenty sacks allowed by just two players at the RT position. That’s approaching almost half of the total 55 sacks last year. And without a better RT, that will continue to happen because DCs will game plan for it. And we tried “chipping” last year with TE V. Davis without much success. The RT has to be a decent pass blocker.
And simply assuming Snyder will be better this year because he beat out a crippled M. Smith is not a sound strategy. We need to see this improvement in a few real games with real blitzing and stunting before I will say he’s improved. Right now we’re just hoping, and if it doesn’t happen, neither Sims nor Boone can do the job right now. The current situation is bad – Snyder is the only viable backup at LT and there is no viable backup at RT except, maybe, towards the end of the season, Boone. This is a major fail for McCloughan.
by MontanaPass on Aug 31, 2009 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And simply assuming Snyder will be better this year because he beat out a crippled M. Smith is not a sound strategy.
That’s not the only part of people’s assumption that the sack numbers will improve. Snyder may or may not be better, but this year’s offense is designed with a lot less of those 7-step drops that are a Martz staple. I think that alone should account for a significant reduction in sacks, but only time will tell.
I just don’t believe that a RT should be paid more than a center. That’s all I really meant with my original comment. If a good center makes $4M to $5M a year, I don’t envision a RT should cost a team more than that.
by sfgfan on Aug 31, 2009 1:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What he said.
I’ll add that any time we discuss sack totals from last year, it would be better to discuss the final 8 games instead of the full season. The style of offense at the end of the season more reflects what we’ll see all this year, with still fewer seven step drops. Also, Hill was the QB during that time instead of JTO who often held the ball way too long (to say nothing of having poor pocket presense to back-side pressure, thus the fumbles).
Allowing that the design of the offense is to have a 55/45 run-pass ratio, if you believe that Staley is a top 10-12 LT in the league, Heitmann a top 12 Center and Synder has improved from last season I don’t see what the problem is. If you don’t believe those things I’d be intersted in a list of which LTs and Centers are superior. The Snyder question can only be answered during reg games but he certainly looked better in the two preseason games.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Aug 31, 2009 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't remember for sure...
… but I think the sack rate in the second half of the season (when Hill was QB) pretty much mirrored that of the first half. Even if it seems like the offense changed, Martz was still calling for those seven-step drops. The only difference was the Hill was (and still is) more willing to go to the checkdown option sooner than his peers.
by sfgfan on Aug 31, 2009 3:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
huh?
The style of offense at the end of laste season more reflects this season? How is that the case since we have a completely different offensive coordinator. Oh you mean running less 7 step drops? Oh well I guess that makes it the same. You forget that Off Coordinators change blocking schemes and assignments. Just because we are taking less 7 step drops doesn’t mean we won’t have a turnstile for a RT. You forget that we weren’t taking 7 steps drops before Martz and still gave up 55 sacks.
by hudd07 on Aug 31, 2009 3:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sacks given up in 2007 have no bearing on this season. Why? That team had very little talent all around, especailly on offense. Plus old guy Dilfer played QB for most of the season and Hostler was the coordinator. Comparing this Niner team to 2007 is like comparing them to the 2002 playoff team.
My larger point about the last eight games was that they ran the ball more than the first half of the season and reduced turnovers. I expect to see that continue this season under Raye.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Aug 31, 2009 5:25 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Snyder beat out Smith
And we’re only having this conversation due to Smith’s retirement. Without that, Snyder would still be the starter. We have to believe, until proven otherwise, that Snyder is improved over last year and more than capable. Sing has said as much and I doubt he would lie. Snyder needn’t be Pro-Bowl level. Just better than Sims/Kwame and Snyder ‘08; in other words, a top 15 RT who doesn’t get our QB blindsided or have a penalty every game. I think he can do that.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Aug 31, 2009 12:51 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Snyder beat out a "crippled" M. Smith.
In other words, it wasn’t any contest and Snyder beat out exactly nobody. That doesn’t mean I don’t think Snyder will be improved, it just means I want to see an improvement in real games before I call it.
by MontanaPass on Aug 31, 2009 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Snyder didn't beat out anyone.. Sing put Snyder in as starting RT and said that Snyder earned the job
Smith being hurt didn’t enable him the opportunity to beat out Snyder.
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
by Eastbayjim on Aug 31, 2009 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Smith didn'y play poorly
when he practiced/played. Snyder was still better and earned it. What does that mean? We’ll begin to find out in 13 days.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Aug 31, 2009 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
The important part is not any of us telling McC or Sing that they need to get a new RT.. if SIng is not pleased with the performace of Sims and Boone then he and McC will get someone else. Hopefully someone worth having.
I did see in one of the last Sing entries on the website that he said they were looking into it. Also, I believe in one of Maiocco’s posts, he said they were getting calls on Huard. That could be an opportunity to get a new RT who can back up for awhile.
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
by Eastbayjim on Aug 31, 2009 3:30 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If we get anything for Huard...
I’ll be happy. Prefer we send him to the AFC since he’s spent all offseason practicing with our team.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Aug 31, 2009 5:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So.....
The RT position is for failures? But you still pay him LT money. What make him a better at RT than LT ? If you going to do that, you might as well get the best RT in college and pay him the same amount. If he fails, what do you do, move him to center where he’s surrounded by Guards?
sfgfan, you and I have been going around about those position. You have stated some very good points and I do listen since you do know what’s going on. BUT, I would pay a RT all the money if he’s a long term member. Remember, it been our weakest position for to many years.
by LASVEGASNINER on Aug 31, 2009 5:36 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Geez
Think about it this way: there are A LOT of tackles taken in the first two rounds. Usually, you want said players (higher draft picks, especially first rounders) to at least try to be left tackles first (because of the fiscal investment in them). I didn’t say you SIGN failed LT’s to be RT’s to LT money. I’m saying that guys like Kwame Harris (I’m sure there are more examples) who were drafted to be LT’s but failed to materialize as such DURING their first contract is why salaries for RT’s are often high.
As for what makes a player a better RT than LT, it’s just skillset. The most difficult talent to develop is pass protection, especially on the outside. The best pass-protectors are ALMOST always left tackles. Even if they were drafted to play RT, if they show they’re better at pass-pro, they move to the left side and get paid more. At RT, the player is generally stronger at road-grading/run-blocking, as that is (usually) the strong side of the offense. Can a right tackle be a good pass protector? Sure, he can. However, when that guy hits free agency, you better believe he’ll look to become a left tackle and get paid as such.
by sfgfan on Sep 1, 2009 9:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
A random question
if anyone knows, kind of based on where this series of comments has gone…
As far as I understand, LTs are more valued because they are better pass blockers and thus better at protecting the QBs blindside. But if you have a left-handed QB, doesn’t the right side, and thus RT, become the blindside. So do teams with left-handed QBs put there better T on the right side? Or is it just a standard LT is the super pass blocker, RT is the run blocking mauler?
by Sebaz49 on Sep 1, 2009 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If I'm not mistaken...
… the 49ers did just that when Steve Young was around. I don’t know if they switched it around when Young would get hurt, though.
by sfgfan on Sep 1, 2009 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cody wallace
Not that Heitman is anywhere near the end but Wallace is the backup Center and Guard.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Aug 31, 2009 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Backup at center...
… MAYBE. I’d imagine that if Heitmann goes down, the guy who gets the nod at center first would be Tony Wragge. Wragge is the 49ers primary backup at guard and center right now.
by sfgfan on Aug 31, 2009 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're right about Heitmann
And I may be over valueing Wallace but he could be a player. Scotty Mac has done pretty well with his draft choices.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Aug 31, 2009 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You really think Cody Wallace is a good pick?
A 4th round pick who hasn’t seen the field yet and is regularly tossed around by dlinemen in practice? Sorry, but he was a major fail at the Senior Bowl the year he was drafted and continues to take up a roster spot without contributing anything. I can’t agree that this is a successful draft pick by McCloughan.
by MontanaPass on Aug 31, 2009 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Center...
… isn’t always about strength or what have you. Yes, he hasn’t made the active-48 roster yet, but that’s because he’s one-dimensional and is inexperienced. The center makes all the reads and adjustments for the line before a snap, and it takes time to develop that kind of skill. Heitmann is far from being one of the best centers in the league, but he’s by far the 49ers best option at center.
Good pick? I don’t know, but it’s a little too early to call it a bad pick.
by sfgfan on Aug 31, 2009 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know
Thus why I said I may be over valueing him. I have not attended practice so I don’t know if he’s regulary tossed around or solid. I do know that if he makes the roster he’s certainly not a waste because they have other options to take up a roster spot and attempt to develop. I do think that learning from Heitman is not a bad thing.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Aug 31, 2009 2:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
McC has done pretty good with the OL that he has drafted so far.
Heitman didn’t do that much until he took over for Newberry.. and not he is real good.
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
by Eastbayjim on Aug 31, 2009 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wallace
is NOT good and IS being tossed around. He is small even for a Center.
by hudd07 on Aug 31, 2009 3:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did I say What ?
I said start looking for the future. Heitmann as been the steadest player on the line. But he getting into the years and we need to start looking for a future realiable replacement. Center takes time as well as every OL positions. Signing PS player and players cut off the squad shows desperate signs of trouble.
Example: Toledo and Bender came from someone elses’ PS. They will never be 1st stringers unless by Chance/injury.
by LASVEGASNINER on Aug 31, 2009 5:54 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Alex Boone
He underachieved for 4 years at Ohio State and was regularly pushed around.
Soft was a word that was used a lot about him.
Hopefully that’s changed but as a 49ers fan I sure wouldn’t be pinning my hopes on him.
by Buckblog on Aug 31, 2009 8:43 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Huh?
I NEVER head those things at all. Granted he underachieved his Sr season a little but he didn’t get drafted because of his run-ins with the law but he was a very good LT and fit right into the mold of a run blocking RT. Not sure how he can be both soft and pushed around but still be a good run blocking RT. Usually those guys do the pushing….
http://www.fftoolbox.com/nfl_draft/profile_display.cfm?prospect_id=1258 GREAT run blocker
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/preview08/news/story?id=3548678 ROCK OF the O Line
http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/draft08/insider/columns/story?columnist=kiper_jr_mel&id=3337794 Link where he is top 3 Oline on Kiper’s draft board for Jr.
Boone is good. I don’t think we need another RT. Boone will catch up. He is listed as VERY intelligent with good technique. Remember he was a LT in college. He will take over for Sims by midway in the season.
by hudd07 on Aug 31, 2009 4:07 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
who
is the other former 49er? or dare i ask?
by save10 on Aug 31, 2009 9:02 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Jonas Jennings is the other
but I actually wouldn’t mind so much having him. It seems like our best FA options are older tackles mostly dealing with some sort of injury issues like Marvel was. The plus for Jennings is that he got injured in week two of last year which means it’s been nearly a year since he last played and if we were to sign him it would be after the worst part of training camp.
Additionally, he knows the team and is probably familiar with the offense and since he wouldn’t be stepping right into a starting role and be asked to play a lot that might mean his injury-proneness wouldn’t be nearly as much of an issue.
He can also play both sides and frankly I’d rather have him than Sims as a backup.
So what? Is my short term memory too short, am I crazy? Or is this actually a viable option?
by foosball4949 on Aug 31, 2009 9:23 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
How is he familiar with the offense? It's a NEW offense just this year.
by hudd07 on Aug 31, 2009 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
because it's similar to the one norv turner ran when he was here
by foosball4949 on Aug 31, 2009 4:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
same terminology
same theory
Also forgot to add that Jennings is actually a pretty good power run blocker
by foosball4949 on Aug 31, 2009 4:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Press for a Trade
I advocate that we avoid a free agent pick up for RT and go instead for a trade. I want somebody VERY GOOD AND RIGHT NOW. That’s what Marvel Smith was suppose to be, and the team going forward is really dependent upon this depth, or yet another season is in jeopardy. We don’t know if Snyder has in fact come into his own, or was just better than the clearly ailing Smith. We have surplus talent and need to trade that for what is most needed, especially as the offense looks for its passing legs in the first quarter of the season. I prefer not to choose between knee and back ailments. The FO will let the fans down if this issue isn’t dealt with properly; the gamble on M. Smith lost: now pay the bet! Sorry to be so grumpy on this one, while in most other areas I’m very supportive of the FO.
by Vertigo on Aug 31, 2009 9:50 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Maybe we should just wait?
31 teams are each going to cut over 20 players, that’s over 600 players!
I’m sure Scotty can find one useful RT among those 600….
by chikmagnet_565 on Aug 31, 2009 10:15 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Good old Scotty !
Other than B. Jones, he did a terrible job in finding front line players and they were out there early. So base on that fact, I thought he would go good into the draft and pick up good people. He did and didn’t. Yes, he pick up good players in later rounds but to say there was no one in the 2nd and 4th he didn’t like ? There were plently of good choices out there at the time.
Scotty pick Toledo and Bender off the practice squads and they are what they are, at best ,2nd stringer.
Another fact, If Sing had mention earlier that Synder will try out for the RT position, it might have left a lot less speculation about the OL.
by LASVEGASNINER on Aug 31, 2009 5:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And if he can't,
what then? Seems too risky … Better to use that strategy for a pass rusher to replace Lawson.
by Vertigo on Aug 31, 2009 10:36 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Don't like anyone as of 8/31 but Bender
For right now, Snyder is fine as the starter with Bender being the keeper from the current roster as of 8/31. What happens in the next week and a half with all the cuts? Who knows, but the Niners should not ignore this need any further.
Niner Madman
"The Voice of Reason"
by NinerMadman on Aug 31, 2009 8:28 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 





















