Niners Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Uga VII, Requiescat in Pace: A Tribute to a Damn Good 'Dawg

49ers-Seahawks: Validating the week 1 win

I wasn't quite sure how to word the title, so I'll just cut to the chase here: Do the 49ers HAVE to beat Seattle this weekend to get any value out of the week 1 road victory against the Arizona Cardinals?  It's hard to make such a black and white argument of course.  A win is always valuable, no matter what happens the following week.  At the same time, one has to wonder what kind of momentum would be lost by a home loss to the Seahawk.

Obviously two games do not decide the season.  Or at least, the first two games of the season.  The NFC West is a notoriously weak division (just ask Bill Simmons this week), so one might argue two wins over NFC West opponents don't mean a lot.  Of course, I think most of us agree that is BS.  Any win is an important win and starting out 2-0 in the division would be a big plus for the team.

In the end, a win over the Seahawks means people start talking up the 49ers (even if it's a tight, ugly contest like last week's game).  A loss to the Seahawks and I think all that momentum from last week is lost.  Obviously I'm not declaring it a lost season (that would be ridiculous), but it definitely hurts things.  If you want to be in the playoff hunt, you have to be winning your home games.  And as a member of the NFC West you have to at least be winning your home divisional games.

This post is more meant to open this to discussion than anything else.  It's a pretty simply question.  Do the 49ers have to win this week to validate their win last week?

0 recs  |  Comment 217 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

They have to win...

period. The sched get’s pretty tough afterwards.

Well, we're waiting....

by drummer on Sep 18, 2009 12:34 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yes

they do have to win, simple as that.

by danknerd49 on Sep 18, 2009 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes.

While last week’s win vs. AZ made a statement, nobody ever viewed the Cardinals as a legit team anyway. If they can beat a more balanced team like Seattle, then the momentum might carry over to some games that they are almost certain to lose.

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Sep 18, 2009 12:43 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

last word

Last time I check, Arizona was the NFC defending champions. Thats good enough for me to say that they are legit.

by 49RFAN on Sep 18, 2009 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

They won...

by default. 9-7 when we temporarily relinquished our FOUR YEAR throne, and your team wasn’t good enough to take it.

Now we’re back and healthy, and better defensively.

We’re taking it back!

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Healthy enough

to beat the Niners.

That’s all the health we need this week, and we’ve got enough of it to knock Shaun Hill on his ass, vanquish Frank Gore to 3 yard carries, and grind out a win with our offense, which any way you look at it has far more firepower than yours, even if not yet clicking on all cylinders.

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 2:56 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Then What happend?

If your’re healthy enough to beat us, what happend? You should have beaten us but Singletery has us play tough football, not your mistake riddled team I saw last week.

by 49RFAN on Sep 18, 2009 3:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Mistake riddled?

We started a little overly amped, but settled down nicely.

I watched both games at the same time too, and I saw in your game a team that was a shell of themselves last year play you guys and remain competitive despite significant injuries at their skill positions.

I honestly didn’t think you won last week’s game. I just thought you were better than the Cards at not losing it.

And what do you mean, “if your’re(sic) healthy enough to beat us, what happend(sic)?” I’m unclear here. What happened when? Last week we won 28-0. Last year we split with you despite being banged all to hell.

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nu-uh!

You are!

Or should I go, “I know you are, but what am I?”

Your smack has downgraded to calling me delusional when your own Niner-fan brethren can’t even string together a sentence or two of semi-coherent semi-grammatical thought.

Wow.

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 3:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And

Rephrase….Last week you all beat (THE RAMS) 28-0. hardly anything to brag about

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 3:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A shutout is always something to brag about

A 28-point margin of victory is something to brag about. What are we supposed to do, cry about beating the living snot out of another team? Are we supposed to complain that we had our running game and passing game running while shutting out our opponents?

Or are we only allowed to cheer a victory if we barely squeak past our opponents?

by ninjasocks on Sep 18, 2009 3:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Injury riddled opponents...

I might add.

Kurt Warner could barely throw. Boldin could barely run. Breston didn’t even play.

That’s a lot of pieces of the Cards biggest strength, negated before the opening kickoff. I’d be a little disappointed I didn’t beat them by more, if I was the Cards…

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 3:55 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Warner could barely throw?

Where’ d you get that? Unless you mean because he was under so much pressure, in which case that’s not injury that’s pass rush. I hope Hass is continually introduced to the same Sunday.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 18, 2009 4:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We

forced Warner to go to his check downs all day. If we keep the ball in front of us, there won’t be many teams that get huge plays on our D

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 4:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Do us a favor

Do the same thing to Warner again in San Fran.

I have a new hatred for all things Cardinals.

We’ll take care of him in week 6. ;-)

The Rams are doomed so it should be a 2 man race. Winner this Sunday gets a head start.

"[Aaron] Curry is not a good pass-rusher" - Fearless Frog, 4/25/2009

by SSreporters on Sep 18, 2009 4:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

What would happen in the scenario that we finished tied with overall record and also tied in division record?

Does anyone know? Is it better NFC record after that?

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 4:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Assuming we split our season series

Common opponents is next.

"[Aaron] Curry is not a good pass-rusher" - Fearless Frog, 4/25/2009

by SSreporters on Sep 18, 2009 4:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So

Basically our records against the NFC North and AFC South this year?

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 4:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

From what I saw, yes...

and we watched the game with my roommate, who is the first true Cardinal fan I’ve ever met. (He lives in Denver now but from AZ). He said the same thing, that Warner just did not look at all healthy.

But, what does he know. He only watched every Cardinal game last year.

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 5:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thats cause

he was in the dirt 90% of the day. Don’t think it’ll be different for Matt

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 5:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fieldturf in AZ.

We have to go to an antiquated place like the Bay Area to even see dirt these days in the NFL.

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 5:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thats too bad

Seems like teams are getting further and further away from tradition

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 6:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I've noticed that as well...

at least in regard to the niners and their tradition…

Seriously though, you are right. I miss having the occasional mud-bowl game.

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 6:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What does he know? He's only a bit biased perhaps

And perhaps looking for an excuse why he team was beat. Hey, I watched every Niner game last year, a few AZ reg season games and all their playoff games. Kurt looked fine just dominated up front and WRs often smothered in coverage. So what do you know. Two people with different perspectives. Only one if us was looking for excuses.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 18, 2009 7:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is all coming

from the same people that are going to be whining and crying that they were injured and that’s the reason they lost….

quack quack quack

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 3:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hardly.

If we lose to the Niners, I will admit that A) your team is better than I thought B) you have an actual honest to god, legitimate chance to win the division.

But, I’m not too worried. You have Shaun Hill throwing to Josh Morgan and Isaac Bruce. Not exactly combinations that would strike fear in the hearts of D.C.’s everywhere.

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 3:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You must have been taking a leak

when S. Hill tossed a perfect strike to I Bruce for something like 50 yards last week in AZ.

The future ain't what it used to be. Go Niners!

by riderless on Sep 18, 2009 4:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I might have missed it...

I admit I was drinking and watching Seattle just give the Rams a drubbing as my focus point…

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was too busy cheering on the Hawks at the game

Literally willing the Rams into 2 false starts and a missed 45-yard FG.

by ninjasocks on Sep 18, 2009 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

37 yard FG

And one penalty was a Delay of Game thanks to the center not hearing the signal.

"[Aaron] Curry is not a good pass-rusher" - Fearless Frog, 4/25/2009

by SSreporters on Sep 18, 2009 5:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good

I hope your DC’s are thinking along those lines. Typically when people under estimate, thats when they get bit in the rear

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 4:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yup, we're in direct communication with our DCs

We’ve already told them to ignore Isaac Bruce and pretend Josh Morgan isn’t there. Also, we made sure they’re going to blitz 11 on every down, just like in Madden.

by ninjasocks on Sep 18, 2009 4:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What

how retarded…

It was a comment saying I hope your DC’s are thinking along those same lines. When did I say you have walkie talkie’s. Get real

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 4:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You have to win it

while we’re in it, otherwise you have no ownership rights.

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 6:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As of right now

AZ owns it…so its not like you all dont have to earn it just as well

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 6:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nope.

You have to HOLD it for more than a single year to have ownership. Otherwise you’re just renting.

AZ got a sweet deal on a 1 year lease, but now the landlords are telling them to vacate.

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 6:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

HAHAHA

You really like to live in the PAST dontcha? I am glad I don’t see things like that cause we owned it and were the original landlords since 1946. You guys got booted out of one place already being in the AFC West originally and more often than not finished at the bottom of the barrell…

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 6:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So what?

You had a good 5 year run…get over it…AND yourself

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 6:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

They came closer to winning the SB than Seattle

I’m not believer in AZ, but when you win on the road vs the defending division and conference champ, that shows well. Winning division road games should never be taken for granted. After all, Seattle is 0-3 in the new AZ stadium. Having won there twice we’d be happy to share with Seahawk fans what the feels like.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 18, 2009 2:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Our game is the NFL equivalent

of the 72 Olympic Mens’ Basketball Gold Medal game.

Game didn’t exist, because it didn’t exist fair.

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Olympia is now brewed in Wisconsin

The best beer in the world is brewed in the Pacific Northwest. The crap gets brewed in the Midwest.

by ninjasocks on Sep 18, 2009 11:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's sad, actually...

I loved that brewery when I was a kid, it was so iconic. And it is much better “crap beer” than PBR or natty light.

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 19, 2009 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Um...
nobody ever viewed the Cardinals as a legit team anyway

You sure about that Frog?

by LantermanC on Sep 18, 2009 12:46 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure I can count as everybody

But I’m in the group he’s talking about…

Never use a big word where a diminutive alternative would suffice.

by YoungWillis on Sep 18, 2009 1:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yep.

If we lose this game, Week 1 will be all about the Cardinals Super Bowl hangover, their aging QB, their changeover at the OC position, and Boldin’s contract.

If we win, while it will still be somewhat passed off to the Seahawks being a “home” team and being a bit banged up, we’ll be solidly first in our division, and at least viewed as a threat.

We’ll need that to carry us past Week 3, when it could get VERY ugly against the Vikings. As it stands, though a Week 2 win puts us in the conversation, I think that conversation would unfortunately be as much about how bad the NFC West is as it would the 49ers being a surprise team.

by Quiet Fool on Sep 18, 2009 12:53 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Oh my...

you’ve been listening to those east coast guys, haven’t you?

The NFC West isn’t that bad. It just doesn’t have any truly great teams in it. By the end of the season, however, the winner/last man standing will be seasoned with the potential for greatness.

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

The NFC West

isn’t nearly as bad as the AFC west now.

by foosball4949 on Sep 18, 2009 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe

But the Rams have at least been to the Superbowl this century

by ninjasocks on Sep 18, 2009 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This century is the 21st century

The Rams, Cards and Seahawks have all been to the Superbowl in the 21st century.

What are you babbling about?

by ninjasocks on Sep 18, 2009 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Your Honor, may I approach the Bench?

Let me use my super powerful ability to reason here.

If the Rams, the Cardinals and the Seahawks all made the Super Bowl, does that mean the only team in NFC West NOT to have made it to the Super Bowl is…. the Niners?

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure

They couldn’t possibly the only team in the division that doesn’t have a Pro Bowl QB AND hasn’t been in the Super Bowl this century. The thought just boggles the mind.

by ninjasocks on Sep 18, 2009 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And yet none of us has WON a SB this decade

So we’re even there. But certainly not in the trophy case.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 18, 2009 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jeff Garcia went to the Pro Bowl three times this decade.

GROUGTHINK ALERT
The first Chester Arthur fanboy ever.

by groug on Sep 18, 2009 3:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Four, if you count when he went for teams other than the Niners.

GROUGTHINK ALERT
The first Chester Arthur fanboy ever.

by groug on Sep 18, 2009 3:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

what omg r u serious

when did this happen?

It was Johnny Hopkins, and Sloan Kettering, and they were blazin that s*** up everyday.

by 49erLou on Sep 18, 2009 9:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

zomg i wonder if there's some kind of connection!

It was Johnny Hopkins, and Sloan Kettering, and they were blazin that s*** up everyday.

by 49erLou on Sep 18, 2009 10:05 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Correlation is not causation, but

you probably should have re-signed him when he was a free agent a couple of weeks ago.

Oh well, I guess there’s always next year (or the year after or the year after that).

by ninjasocks on Sep 18, 2009 10:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

we probably never should have let him go in the first place

It was Johnny Hopkins, and Sloan Kettering, and they were blazin that s*** up everyday.

by 49erLou on Sep 18, 2009 10:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Crap

I just realized that he was on the market for a bit and was looking for a starting job. You should have grabbed him when you had a chance. Maybe then you’d have a chance at the postseason.

by ninjasocks on Sep 18, 2009 10:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am

pretty sure that a MAJORITY of people would use the word decade to describe what you were trying to describe. I think its funny that you used the word “century”…thats all

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know

what it was for…I think it was pretty funny that he has to use such dramatic words to get a point across. Almost like he was trying to make up for his franchises history

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And what did you do? We never lost one.

And thats all the chickens have ever been in.

by Natural Red on Sep 18, 2009 11:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And to think this was considered to be the best or second best last year

Things change quick. I think all NFC West teams will be better than last year, with only AZ not having a better record.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 18, 2009 2:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Atlanta and New Orleans should be pretty solid.

/is always wrong about other teams

GROUGTHINK ALERT
The first Chester Arthur fanboy ever.

by groug on Sep 18, 2009 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Didn't say I believed it...

but yes, the conversation will have an East Coast-focus, and they’ll buy into the NFC West being poor (despite postseason success) fair quicker than taking the 49ers seriously.

by Quiet Fool on Sep 18, 2009 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We'll hear excuses with most any win until we are consistent

Part of that is our poor play and record since 2004. Part of that is playing in the West. If we win 9 or 10 games, Seattle wins 8 or 9 and AZ wins 8 that would mean three teams didn’t have a losing record. If the Rams can win more than 2 and look as though they’re improving, the West would receive some cred.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 18, 2009 2:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

A loss wouldn’t be the end of the world, but the road to the playoffs means being the best team in the division. Beating division rivals usually helps that cause.

"Just another ahahahaha... laugher."
bok bok bok... BOCOCK!

by capnk on Sep 18, 2009 1:01 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Defensive Test

Let’s face it, we are not winning our division or even getting to the playoffs unless our defense is as good as many of us believe it is. With that being said, there have been arguments that the Cardinals offense was not at full strength and that is only reason they lost. I think the bottom line is we need our 49er’s defense to win this game by holding the Seahawks’ so called balanced attack to minimal points if any at all, few enough points for Hill, Gore, and the rest of the gang to score enough to win. I predicted a 14-13 win for us. That is how close I see this game being. If our defense plays strong and we still lose the game for some stupid offensive reason, like turnovers, poor play by Hill, or even special teams blunders, I would not see our season as a lost cause. But if for some reason, our defense stinks it up, then I think I will have to admit that I have been living in la la Land or just admit that being stationed in Minot North Dakota as made me lose all the common sense I knew I had at one point. Oh and a final note, there is really no way to tell what the Seahawks offense it like after the Lambs game! I question why they only scored 28 on them? Heck last year the Rams Gave up more than that 50% of the time.

by Ten-Man on Sep 18, 2009 1:03 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

The first must win of the season for San Francisco

This is Mike Singletary’s first game as HC facing a “must-win” scenario as well. It will be interesting to see how the team plays in such an important early season contest. All the pieces are set up and in place, Whoseyourmomma missed WED and THU practices, and Burleson has a “hammy” to worry about. In other words, Seattle’s fans are lining up with excuses prepared when San Francisco beats Seattle 35 – 20 this Sunday.

You are about to see what the 2009 49ers are all about, tune in Sunday to find out. If you are going to the game @ Candlestick, amazing. Tailgate your ass off, ass is ok, right? And I’m talking to you James, TAILGATE your ass off. Get there as early as you can and live it up man!

The first must win, is a win, write it down on your paper.

by Andrew Davidson on Sep 18, 2009 1:19 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Sigletary's comments

A win would be a great boost in the division and a loss at home COULD create a temporary set back….BUT, here’s what gives me hope that EVEN IF we lost, that we could continue to have optomistic views of each and every game

Singletary: "I know that what I’m doing is right, so I don’t question myself and you just go forward and if you don’t win this game, it’s not the end of the world, you’ve got 15 more. The most important thing is you continue to build. Sometimes you can lose a game, but you gain something."

That type of philosophy can only be constructive.

I am optomistic for this week’s game. There will be lots of up and downs I’m sure much like last week’s game. But being that the Hawks have racked up a ton of injuries and other key players will be playing hurt, I like our chances and I look for there to be more ups than downs. The second meeting will be a much different game and thier crowd will be heavily involved. But if they cannot stay healthy, they will finish close to what they accomplished last season

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 1:19 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah..

I always love it when leaders never question themselves.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sulDYYAiCU

Good luck with that.

And for the record, sometimes you can lose a game and NOT gain anything. Ask Cincy last week.

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 1:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cincinnati?

Nice REALISTIC comparison….

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 2:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So it isn't real..

despite the fact that it happened last week?

Or because Cincy had that bad of luck and you don’t anticipate that kind of a heartwrenching, never-get-over-it loss for your Niners?

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 2:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Two

TOTALLY different franchises… and I mean as a whole…from the front office trickling all the way down to the fans

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 2:30 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bush and Singletary?

LMAO!!!!!

Your comparisons are delusional…do you realize that? Prob not hahaha. That was hilariously dimented. You’re probably the guy who put that together arent ya?

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 2:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're right...

Bush only metaphorically dropped his pants in front of the world.

Singletary went a step beyond metaphor, though he kept it to the locker room.

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Never understood why that bothered people

Most of what happens in a locker room only makes sense in that space in that moment. I certainly don’t need to know about it.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 18, 2009 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed, actually.

I’ve also been in a lot of locker rooms as a player, college player and coach (hoops/baseball) and I’ve never seen a team need such motivation, particularly a team of adult professionals. It just seemed very “jayvee” to me.

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 3:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice props for your self.

I’ll put my resume next to yours any day. Your critical view of our coach is pitiful considering yours is one of our retreads. how is sloppy-seconds…. or thirds.

by Natural Red on Sep 18, 2009 11:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know

Cincy learned that there defense might be pretty good. They also learned to KNOCK IT DOWN!

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 18, 2009 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry...

just an apt allusion between leaders who never change their minds and never question themselves. I’m actually not talking politics there, I’m talking philosophy.

I see a lack of self reflection and questioning as folly. I’m actually not commenting on politics, only on a lack of questioning ones methods, philosophy or principles.

I wish I was as steely-minded as Bush and Singletary, where I knew I should never question anything I ever do.

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I've heard Sing in interviews and he admits to questioning his methods

And seeking input and clarity from all staff. But I also think you have to have a philosophy for football in which you believe so long as you are willing to adjust as things change, i.e. talent on your team, weaknesses of your opponent. We can’t yet say that Sing is unwilling to change. I certainly take him over the waffling Nolan whose philosophy seemed to change bi-weekly. I think Holmgren had a philosphy to which he stuck and I don’t think you’d give back his run as coach.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 18, 2009 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

And I actually agree with you here...

I was mainly mocking your boy up above that said Singletary doesn’t question himself.

I certainly hope for your sake he does, and I hope Bush did too.

I was taught about my philosophy as a basketball coach, “You can ask questions in the system, but you can never question the system.” That would be what you teach the players. However, as a coach you should always be evaluating and analyzing and importantly, taking a step back to do so. Too many coaches don’t back away to evaluate, so they don’t see the total picture. That’s at all levels. And those coaches eventually fail.

I think Mora’s “time off” allowed him to do that to a degree that is rare, and that’s part of what excites me about him as a coach. Plus, he is really enthusiastic. I can also see Singletary being the right coach for you guys after a couple softies and Nolan, who just seemed noble, but lacking in personality and fire.

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We agree

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 18, 2009 3:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Uhh

How was I saying anything of the sort by quoting something h e (Singletary) said himself. You make zero sense.

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 6:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

YES WE HAVE TO WIN

Not a classic case of “must win or the season is over” but we have the momentum, the Hawks are in of Div so if the we want prove to ourselves that we are a playoff caliber team then as they used to say in those old WW11 movies DAMN THE TORPEDOES FULL SPEED AHEAD AND

by WC-Ninerhead on Sep 18, 2009 1:33 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

YES

This game is a must win for the Niners.
1. because Im gonna be there : )
2. it validates what we did in AZ
3. the schedule only gets harder

by Niners_AllDay on Sep 18, 2009 1:50 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Seahawks injuries

At what point do injuries point to a systematic issue with a franchise. The Seahawks are already banged up and it’s week 2. Year after year they have injury issues.

I really think our old school training camp is going to limit the smaller injuries for the team this year. Bumps and bruises sure, but our team has been hardened by Singletary in just a few weeks of hard labor.

by Dave R. on Sep 18, 2009 1:56 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

False logic.

For one thing, we’re not THAT banged up right now. We’re pretty okay for the most part.

Second, we also had “an old school training camp” with Mora as opposed to the Walrus, who was a little more laid back.

Third, “year after year” we haven’t had injury issues. The past couple years, yes we have. And when we got to the SB we were relatively healthy. I think you’ll find most teams that get to the SB are actually relatively healthy— it’s why they got there!

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not in the context of his statement...

That’s like saying we have had many injuries and the tally is four… technically “a few” is three, but does “many” deserve four?

Yes, it is more than “a few” which is technically three, but he was saying in a way that made me believe he was speaking of a long term thing…

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 2:07 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice try

You are pretty banged up. I suspect (being that you played a crappy team this past week), that alot more injuries will pile up throughout the season.

You guys are so injury prone, you should draft an M.D. for your first rounder next year. Or…save the money and invest in neck and leg braces…maybe some crutches?? haha

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 2:06 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We're not that banged up...

of course, last year threw our scale into a much wider range than pretty much anyone.

We have a couple guys out that will hurt us, but we weren’t really expecting much from a couple more anyway.

Tru and Leroy hurt. I don’t even consider Big Walt as hurt, I consider anything we get from him to be gravy at this point. Spencer hurts a bit, but fortunately our backups got plenty of experience last year, so I think we can weather the storm.

And, you like, totally opened yourself up here. It’s almost TOO EASY…. If we did draft an M.D. for our first rounder next year, we’d likely get more usage from him than you’ve gotten from your first rounder THIS year.

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 2:10 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I will agree with you that more injuries will occur during the year, it's the nature of football.

Happens with all teams. The team you played last week was awful banged up, I don’t see you complaining about facing them given those circumstances. In fact, I see Niners fans calling it a huge win, but I just didn’t see it that way.

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Haha

Yeah a Crabtree stab…figures…funny. And if it is TOO EASY, then that shows you metal capacity …or lack there of in your creativeness

Except, the funny thing is, that three of your key players that will play are hurt…Tatupu, Burleson, and Houshmandzadeh (or however you spell that retarded name)…and I hope, hope, hope that Jones and Spencer play cause they’ll be right back outta there. If not, no worries cause we’ll drill right through the back-ups. You are deluded if you think your injuries wont be a factor in this game. And its sort of the domino effect…one injury (especially on the line) leads to more and more

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well...

lack thereof would be the word, it is one word not two.

I do certainly find humor when someone online comments on another’s mental capacity with a grammatical/spelling error included.

Burleson is fine. Housh will be fine for the game. Tatupu? Well, he’ll be missed, but now we get to test our earlier theory that our 4th/5th/6th LB’s are better than your 4th starter and bench.

Injuries will be a factor in the game. No injuries, we crush you. Now we’ll just have to defeat you instead of destroy you…

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

More of a typo

But since you teach the english language at the colliate level, I guess I should take your word for it. Guess you’ve never had a typo or gramatical/ spelling error eh? Too funny

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 7:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey sawdust I find abundant humor in someone...

Who is as miopic as you appear to be.Who spends so much time tooting their own horn and find some sort of glee in correcting someones spelling.

by Natural Red on Sep 18, 2009 11:53 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure how saying...

I’ve been in a ton of locker rooms and never seen a coach drop trou for effect it tooting my own horn.

And if you say someone lacks “metal [sic] capacity” while misspelling several words, you open yourself up to criticism.

Don’t question my mental capacity, I wont be myopically evaluating your spelling while you do it.

Seems simple enough.

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 19, 2009 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know, you've been player, coach, waterboy...

I don’t believe I questioned your menial capacity…..oops. Put the red pencil down and attempt to speak about football.

by Natural Red on Sep 19, 2009 12:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not you...

the other guy went personal with the insult of my mental capacity.

Football talk? Fine. The Seahawks are gonna kick the Niners ass tomorrow, just like the Huskies kicked the Trojans ass.

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 19, 2009 5:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Last time the Huskies were really good

Niners ruled the West and the Seahawks were an afterthought. Glad we’re returning to those times.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 19, 2009 7:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Because...

he has problems spelling it, so of course IT belongs on the short bus, not him…

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 3:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pretty sure

I spelled it correctly…Its ridiculously long…and it does sound like “Who’s your momma”… guess that’s why they made fun of it on a commercial

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 7:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Or alternately, you just possess a painfully small mental-capacity.

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Sep 18, 2009 9:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You have been busy all week.

Showing us your mental capacity And you have left quite an impression.

by Natural Red on Sep 18, 2009 11:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Banged up

1 week in and you have 3 out and a couple more not practicing (but will likely play like Housh).

Maybe the Seahawks haven’t been more injury prone than others, but every 9ers game is seems they have a couple players out for it.

I would heartilly agree that the teams that dodge the injury bug tend to do well into and through the playoffs. But there are a number of teams that are playoff regulars, so it’s not all luck by any means.

Football conditioning does take some toughing up, getting adjusted to hitting and being hit after the offseason is required. I don’t doubt the Seahawks have tried to get their team in the best possible shape for the season, but I don’t believe they have gone through the type of fire of camp Singletary, the amount of hitting is going to become a thing of legend for better or worse after a couple seasons if it hasn’t already gotten around the league.

Our injury report has 1 guy out with a knee from the preseaon, 1 other almost back from a preseason injury and a few taking it easy to heal some bump n bruise type things. I take the injury list as part of the game and frankly expect my team to do it’s best to exploit what it can. I just can’t see taking the position of when we’re healthy then we’ll see when we haven’t played you healthy in several years, nor do I expect to any time soon.

by Dave R. on Sep 18, 2009 2:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You don't believe we've gone through a physical camp...

because you guys had one too.

I know he put your guys through the screws, but Mora is an absolute fitness nut and worked the hell out of the team this offseason far more than Holmgren ever did. Holmgren may very well have run one of the easiest vet-favoring camps out there, but Mora definitely ran a hard core intense physically demanding camp.

Did he hit as much as Singletary?

No. But then, our vet laden team didn’t need to knock each other out, then needed to get stronger and better conditioned. And they did.

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

5 injuries during the game with the 9ers for the seahawks

The Seahawks may need to rent space in the 49ers training room. CB Josh Wilson has suffered an ankle injury and won’t return. He’s the fifth Seahawk to go down, joining QB Matt Hasselbeck (ribs), WR Ben Obomanu (head), LB Lofa Tatupu (hamstring) and LT Sean Locklear (ankle).

from: http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/teams/page/SEA

Something is just not right with the program, be it scouting or training I have no idea, but it’s not good.

by Dave R. on Sep 20, 2009 5:34 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Shaun Hill was on Jum Rome today

Not sure if anyone has seen the interview….pretty good

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 1:57 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I think it's HUGE

we win vs. Seattle. It sets us up to be 3-0 in the division and probably 3-1 record through 4 weeks. I think it’s huge.

by hudd07 on Sep 18, 2009 2:09 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I think its bigger if the Niners lose

The Niners aren’t going to take a game at Qwest, so they’d have to take one at home. If they don’t take one at home, they’ll probably be swept by the Seahawks.

by ninjasocks on Sep 18, 2009 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Won't take one at Qwest?

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 18, 2009 3:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

2-1 there the last three years

While being the flawed team we’d all agree SF has been. And now we’re better. I know it was low hanging fruit from socks but the idea that division teams can’t win at the other teams place when they have is foolish.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 18, 2009 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

IMO Seattle has had 3 advantages at home

Incredible crowd noise (great job building that place). Farthest travel for teams coming west. Having a good team since it opened.

One reason the Niners have had success there is the travel piece carries no weight. Crowd noise is overcomeable when you play well (and it seems like a decent number of Niner fans are there, another benefit of annual visis). Being better always matters but when you play people twice they know your weaknesses and are built (in theory) to take advantage of them.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 18, 2009 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good points.

Travel is really negligible and SF fans are the norm on the West Coast. When Arizona comes, there are no fans obviously since there aren’t even that many Cardinals fans in Arizona…

by LantermanC on Sep 18, 2009 3:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

LOL - so very true

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 18, 2009 3:47 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Are you so sure about the Rams?

I am pretty sure that we can beat them but I would not count on it, like all we have to do is show up. Any team can beat another on any given Sunday and this is a divisional game. Divisional games can have some unually outcomes.

by 49RFAN on Sep 18, 2009 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Must win

Although if memory serves me correctly, we started 2-0 in 2007 and look where that got us….

Granted Alex Smith got hurt but the losing streak that ensued was hard to swallow regardless.

Clearly this team isn’t THAT team.. but 2-0 that year was against the ’Hawks and Rams (I think) so both still in the NFC West.

by return2greatness on Sep 18, 2009 2:12 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Good point - but it was AZ and the STL

Both of those teams had average at best QBs and neither would finish with a winning record. That’s why I’d argue that as important as this win can be to both teams, how the Niners play is just as if not more important than if they win. Being 2-0 while defeating Warner and Hass, the former on the road, would show legitimate progress from last season. But having the defense be strong in both games would show that the unit has improved and is likely the best in the west, a huge key to winning the division. But if we barely win only because Seattle plays horrid, it will eventually bite us when we’re not playing west teams.

I expect the offense to gradually get better throughout the season. The ability to win games while this is happening is a big deal. To be alone in first place while working out the kinks buys us some room for error.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 18, 2009 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not a must-win

Because a loss doesn’t put us out of the running. It’s just much too early in the season to call a game a “must-win”. And we don’t really benefit by calling it as such; if the Niners lose, then woe is us the season is over, and if they win, then, well, they were just doing their jobs.

It’ll be a huge and important win, no doubt. But a loss isn’t the end of the season.

by ffgolden on Sep 18, 2009 2:17 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

We need to win every game!

Every. Single. One.

Going in with the mentality that some losses are more acceptable than others is recipe for bad mojo. In the mind of Singletary, or any player, I never would go into battle thinking that with the odds against me, it’s OK to tuck tail and take the whippin’. I’d be ashamed of my name and position in the world.

If anything, “the bigger they are, the harder they fall” is a much better mindset to have. And with a great chance at owning this division, it’s more of a “are we really going to let the ‘hawks’ get the upper hand?” type of deal. I’d slap myself silly if we let them win the division this year.

Not in my house.

Read me: http://www.addisports.com
Follow me: http://twitter.com/addisports

by addisports on Sep 18, 2009 2:42 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Well said

I think every game is a “must win”

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 2:44 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

NFC West

I’m a Seahawks fan, but I don’t think that you guys are giving any of the teams in our division enough credit. I really don’t think the Rams are going to be as bad as last year, I think the Cards will have a decent record, and I think the Niners and the Hawks both have a very good chance at winning records. Of course, I personally think the Hawks are going to win this game, but regardless of what happens I want the Niners, Rams and Cards to have the best seasons possible (except for their losses to the Hawks of course). Anyway, all I’m saying is don’t underestimate our division. I think there are some talented teams here, and the two most talented will be playing Sunday. I can’t wait!!

by sam1313 on Sep 18, 2009 2:50 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

+1 nice entry

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 18, 2009 3:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I disagree

about the Rams… Everyone is picking them to go 2-14. I can’t even see 2 games on thier schedule that I would pick them in. And watching them manage to not even 3 on the board against you all makes me even more of a doubter.

As much as I am on board with wanting to see the NFC West rise… I think at the most, there will be 2 teams at best that have winning records out of the division

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 4:11 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, and if you guys happen to win, don’t underestimate the value of that victory. The Seahawks are going to be very good this year….

by sam1313 on Sep 18, 2009 2:51 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Good observation.

I agree that we need to win to make the statement that it wasn’t a fluke.

by 49RFAN on Sep 18, 2009 3:09 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Have to? No.

The benefit to it being a division game is you get one more chance to even the series and I expect these two teams to split this season. It would not steal last weeks momentum but would stall it and keep the huge question mark of “unknown” over our team.

I think that it would represent a 2-1 record in the division with wins coming vs our two biggest competitors within the division would certainly be a tie-breaker benefit for later in the year. Nationally, winning two West games will give us no respect but being alone in first would make us part of the conversation. I think all NFC West teams will need to win non-divisional games and road games in the eastern or central time zones to start earning a place on the national stage.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 18, 2009 3:24 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I honestly don't

think the Hawks are as good they think they are. They are coming off a 4-12 season (injuries or not) and here they think they are contenders. I’m sorry but after an embarrassing season like that, you have your work cut out. Bottom line.

Yeah Hasselbeck is back, but honestly, do you really think he will hold up the entire season if your line continues to be injury plagued? Julius Jones is not the answer at running back, anyone who is honest to themselves knows that. Burleson is an okay receiver but with the exception of last year, has never made it through an entire season. TJ can’t do it by himself…so really you guys arent too edgy in that regard. Your defense is the only thing you have going for you and they are mediocre…they aren’t a powerhouse like the Ravens, Eagles, or Giants… I admit that our defense is young, but at least we are on our way to becoming one of those “types” of defenses. You guys are on the way down, and we are on the rise. Mora will be outta there in tops 6 years. Why do you think Atlanta got rid of him??? Anyway, I think you all are way too optimistic for what you have. I will be surprised to see you all go 8-8…and that is my HONEST opinion. 4-12 to 8-8 would be a pretty goos accomplishment considering you cannot stay healthy

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

On Burleson

Correction…I meant started throughout an entire season

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 4:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good points...

for a guy whose team in the last 5 years, starting in 2004, went:
2-14
4-12
7-9
5-11
7-9

Those records there make me, to paraphrase you, “honestly not think the Niners are as good as they think they are.”

I’m sorry, but after 5 straight losing seasons, how exactly do you get to quantify the Niners as a contender if the Hawks after one below .500 season are not?

Honestly, yes I do think Hass will likely hold up the entire season. Our line isn’t incredible, but it is surprisingly deep top to bottom. I think we’ll do okay there. And, none of our line injuries are season ending at this point, they’re just “bang up” injuries that happened. You are assuming that the injuries will get worse, not better.

Hate to break it to you, but Jones doesn’t need to be “the answer” he just needs to be a solid back. He is one. He’ll be just fine. Not worried, AND honest with myself there.

Burleson, with the exception of last year, has always been pretty healthy. And he is a better WR right now, as our 2, than anyone on your team.

TJ doesn’t need to do it by himself, whatever gave you the idea he does?!? He has Nate, he has Carlson, he’ll probably have a little Branch and some young Butler all supporting his pass-catching endeavors. Our WR’s are so much better than yours, top to bottom, I don’t even know how you could possibly use this as a point in your favor.

How do you know our Defense is mediocre, by the way? I think we have more upside than yours, and, by the way, we are awful young and on our way to having one of those “types” of defenses ourselves. The Hawks D is better today than it was in the SB year, it is deep and talented and has a ton of upside. While you are quick to count your struggles under Nolan, we had John Marshall “leading” our D prior to this year, so we also have some great upside potential simply by changing coordinators.

“You are on the way down, and we are on the rise.” Really? I think we’ve managed to pull the always difficult team in transition yet still competitive card. You, on the other hand, have been a “team on the rise” for 4 years now. Of course, after going 2-14, it’s pretty easy to rise little bit by little bit.

Mora out in 6 years, eh? I guess I should take your word on it, because AtL got rid of him… If you don’t know why Atl got rid of him, then you don’t know why he will probably be a Hawk coach for a long long time.

We’re too optimistic for what we have? Again, 7-9, 5-11, 7-9. Last 3 years. See, I was even kind and didn’t include the prior two years that time. Still, that’s pretty weak sauce to be calling ANYONE optimistic.

And I, honestly, will be surprised to see you go 8-8. But then, what do I have to work with there, other than 5 years of historically NOT being 8-8. And that’s my HONEST opinion. 4-12 to 8-8 would be a pretty good accomplishment for you, considering you haven’t won 8 games in a season since 2002.

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know exactly why

Mora was fired… It was because he came in his first season and helped them to a winning season…then got beat in the Championship game. After that it was all down hill for good ol’ Mora. And then he made some STUUUPID comments to the media that Arthur Blank dissaproved of as would any team owner…. Then guess what? He got canned. Is that why he’ll be there for a long long time? I was being generous with saying 6 years…He got chased out of Atlanta by a mob of angry fans and an upset owner. He betrayed his team AND his fans and he will do the same with you…just wait.

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 8:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is all true.

"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."

by Fearless Frog on Sep 18, 2009 9:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Again your selective statistics.

Will not cover the facts that the chickens have never amounted to anything in their history of competing in the NFL.

by Natural Red on Sep 19, 2009 12:08 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I honestly don't think the Hawks are as good as they think they are...

We have some injuries, but I have been very impressed with the play of our back-ups. Watch Will Herring this weekend — he is good. And, I have a lot of confidence in both Seneca Wallace & Mike Teel if Hasselbeck goes down (which I don’t think will happen). Finally, running backs are only as good as their offensive line and the system they are playing in. The zone blocking system has worked well, and I think our guys are picking it up. Plus, we have 2 first round picks next year. The Seahawks will be the biggest thorn in the Niners side for years to come….. IMHO of course!

by sam1313 on Sep 18, 2009 4:11 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Will Herring?

He plays special teams…
Seneca will never be an elite QB..if you’re honest to yourself, you realize that

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 4:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Herring

He’s starting in play of Hill this weekend.

by Fooch on Sep 18, 2009 4:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know

I was making the point that he under normal circumstances plays special teams

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 4:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So?

He was pretty effective as an OLB and pretty good in coverage.

by ninjasocks on Sep 18, 2009 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He will be

exploited. You will miss Hill. I think it will be eveident come Sunday. This isn’t gonna be a walk in the park like some of your fans seem to be thinking.

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 4:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Quick question

Is Nate Davis your backup if Hill goes down?

"[Aaron] Curry is not a good pass-rusher" - Fearless Frog, 4/25/2009

by SSreporters on Sep 18, 2009 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sando disagrees with you

The Niners have no passing game and will have to try to run it through one of the biggest front 7’s in the NFL.

by ninjasocks on Sep 18, 2009 4:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Have no passing game?

It looked fine winning the game on Sunday. Don’t confuse not calling more pass play with the inability execute them.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 18, 2009 4:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Such a ringing endorsement

“It looked fine winning the game on Sunday”

Sando thinks we won’t miss Trufant this week because your passing game is week:
http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/5134/nfc-west-injury-situations-that-matter-18

by ninjasocks on Sep 18, 2009 4:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good for Sando

I like him. He also said AZ would win last Sunday. Ooops…

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 18, 2009 4:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

As did

everyone else. it was a hands down win for the Cards according to most of the media. And alot of people are saying that Seattle is gonna win this week as well. I think it’s easier to win when youre the underdog…not as much pressure. However, I think there will be pressure on the team coming from the coaching staff much like last week. Singletary puts the pressure and accountability on the team. As long as we continue to execute plays with little or no flaw, and not turn the ball over, our chances of winning every week look good. Hasselbeck should have had at least one more pick last week. The Rams defense and the Niners defense are like night and day.

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You sure are asking us...

to be honest with ourselves an awful lot, for a guy whose team hasn’t had a winning season since 2002.

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 4:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Since you're carelessly

throwing around the past….how many Superbowl titles do the Hawks have? I usually keep that one in the vault but every once in a while, when people are acting irrationally, I will throw that out. Don’t like doing it cause last I checked it was 2009 but if you want some facts and stats, I can go off all day long on you.

New year, new team, new attitude. Same with you… although you are hurt again, maybe not as bad as last year…but those are the facts.

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 5:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lame.

First, I’m not acting irrationally.

And your “facts” are awful. Your facts basically consist of opinions of optimism, but when I state something on a similar plane, I’m “not being honest” but you, apparently, are.

I’m also not all that sure what SB’s in the 90’s and 80’s have to do with present circumstances. I think you can make a pretty logical argument, however, that the last 5 years performance does have a distinct bearing on present situation and circumstance.

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 18, 2009 5:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Really

So the Dolphins who had those same 5 year stats….were horrible when things turned around for them last year huh?

How contradicting can one be in two sentences???? The past is the past. Your point is hollow, just like your views on where things are for you all

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 5:18 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let me ask this

Can you tell me how many players of our 2003 team are still playing for us…coaching staff as well?

You see what I mean. The last 5 years has no bearing in the 2009 Season. So yes, in a way, you’re being maybe not irrational but there is obviously a neglect for the logistics of the way things are

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 5:24 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You seem to be a victim;

Of the post hock fallacy. The word lame in regard to your endless blathering does not quite describe the lack of critical thought you have shown. When are you going to realize that other than one year , the Seahawks have been the laughing stock of the NFL. And you have gall to reference that record with that of the 49ers! I think you need to have another Ole.

by Natural Red on Sep 19, 2009 12:32 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So, four of the last five years...

you were laughing at us, while looking up at us from the standings?

Sweet.

Mancrushed. Jake Locker for Heisman 2010.

by whiskey chainsaw on Sep 19, 2009 11:43 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I know it must be difficult...

For you to see the failed logic of comparing four or five years of basic mediocrity by the Seahawks to the history of the 49ers. Anyone can couch their argument with a selective quotation of statistics. I don’t deny the Niners have been down but attempting to equate the histories of the two franchises does not hold water.

by Natural Red on Sep 19, 2009 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We released Brian Russell

Our problems have been solved.

Greg Knapp replaced the FB draw with a trick play (did Knapp even run a draw play during meaningful gametime last week?)

John Marshall’s 66 man blitz on 3rd and 44 is gone.

We released Brian Russell.

We released Brian Russell.

"[Aaron] Curry is not a good pass-rusher" - Fearless Frog, 4/25/2009

by SSreporters on Sep 18, 2009 4:14 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Man I so want to get in to the smack-talk game

But I can’t. They were my first team growing up even though I was closer to the Raiders’ stadium and I don’t have the heart to do it.

Did people just forget that if Mike Martz had decent clock management in Arizona and Hasselbeck doesn’t throw to Rodgers-Cromartie the Seahawks would be playing the defending NFC West champs? It’s not like the 49ers were bad, they were two breaks from pulling off an improbable comeback.

A must-win? I don’t know. But the Niners have a tougher schedule and it’s a home game so it would be best to defend your turf.

Good luck to you guys this weekend.

"[Aaron] Curry is not a good pass-rusher" - Fearless Frog, 4/25/2009

by SSreporters on Sep 18, 2009 4:13 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Appreciated

Not sure tho why think SF has the tougher schedule. We play the same teams at the same locations with the exception of two: we go to Philly while you go to Dallas, and we host Atlanta while you host Tampa. I would agree that Atlanta is better than Tamps but if we have the same results from those respective games, all in scheduling is equal.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 18, 2009 4:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Will Herring?

He plays special teams…
Seneca will never be an elite QB..if you’re honest to yourself, you realize that

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 4:13 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Herring plays substitute LB

But yeah mainly special teams.

Seneca isn’t an elite QB so I don’t get that. He just needs to perform like he did last year and win the game if Hass goes down.

Last year he had Koren Robinson and Courtney Taylor. This year he has Burleson and Houshmazode.

"[Aaron] Curry is not a good pass-rusher" - Fearless Frog, 4/25/2009

by SSreporters on Sep 18, 2009 4:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

All I am saying

Is that you have just as many holes in your team as you did last year. They are all just in different areas

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 4:17 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not denying we have holes

Our secondary depth is not good and we still don’t have Trufant.

Special teams…we just suck.

But our team is improved from last year. No doubt.

"[Aaron] Curry is not a good pass-rusher" - Fearless Frog, 4/25/2009

by SSreporters on Sep 18, 2009 4:20 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Most of our holes came from our defensive line

Because the other team saw our DLs suck and the RBs went through the big hole. ;-)

"[Aaron] Curry is not a good pass-rusher" - Fearless Frog, 4/25/2009

by SSreporters on Sep 18, 2009 4:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Fine

I’ll give you that, you are improved. But “how much” is the question at hand. If you have your entire team healthy, then maybe you are contenders. But there is that IF as of right now

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 4:25 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's why they play the game

I respect the Niners defense a lot.

The offense? Not too sure about Raye.

"[Aaron] Curry is not a good pass-rusher" - Fearless Frog, 4/25/2009

by SSreporters on Sep 18, 2009 4:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

To be honest

I am not sure about him either…he’s only had one game as our OC. There’s 15 more to go

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 4:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

We’re liking Greg Knapp so far. He needed 1 game to do everything Holmgren didn’t (run trick plays, do a QB sneak, SCREEN PASS!!!).

"[Aaron] Curry is not a good pass-rusher" - Fearless Frog, 4/25/2009

by SSreporters on Sep 18, 2009 4:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I saw that

It must be exciting for your fans to have a dose of something of which you lacked for years.

There were a couple of questionable calls last week with Raye. For instance the 2 times he ran the ball 3 times in a row. I did not understand it at all. The last time he did it, may have been influenced by Singletary wanting to play field position. But I think you have to sometimes take risks to be great. We did that one time with Bruce on that 49 yarder after we drew your safeties in by using Vernon in the pass game. We’re okay with going to our check downs and letting them make plays with some YAC.

It’ll be interesting. But I did watch a large portion of your game against the Rams and I don’t think you were tested at all. I cannot see the Rams finishing higher than 32nd both in offense and defense this year. They may be the Lions of last year

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 4:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

When you fumble the opening kickoff

That’s a sign you’re doomed.

How often did Raye use screen passes?

He drew up a beautiful call to adjust to the blitz on the winning TD.

"[Aaron] Curry is not a good pass-rusher" - Fearless Frog, 4/25/2009

by SSreporters on Sep 18, 2009 4:41 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

It was

a moderate usage of the screen passes but I have a feeling that will be increased this week. I am sure you will test Snyder on the right too with some blitzes…so if Hill can pick those up and audible at the right times, the screen pass may be useful. I think that you will see Vernon being utilized a bit more which could open things up for us down field. I know that Raye knows his X’s and O’s very well and is good at finding mismatches adn holes in the defense. We will be picking on Herring and Wislon. If we are smart, we will have taken notes on what the Vikings did last year when teams were stacking the box against AP.

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 5:38 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

We don’t have anywhere near the holes in the team as we did last year. Both of our lines are about 70% new, and that was our biggest problem last year. Our entire receiving core (except for Carlson) is new. Also, last year Seneca was hurt too, and we didn’t have a single WR that could catch. Anyway, Seahawks are a good team and the Niners are going to be shocked on Sunday….

by sam1313 on Sep 18, 2009 4:19 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Burleson and Branch are new?

That took me by storm.

Then again Branch never shows up to actually play a game so I guess he’s new.

"[Aaron] Curry is not a good pass-rusher" - Fearless Frog, 4/25/2009

by SSreporters on Sep 18, 2009 4:21 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Burleson went down in the first game last year

He’s playing this year and wasn’t last year. That’s close enough to new for me.

And he’s a weapon when he’s on the field. Don’t sleep on him.

by ninjasocks on Sep 18, 2009 4:26 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

How can he be new when he's been with us for 4 years?

"[Aaron] Curry is not a good pass-rusher" - Fearless Frog, 4/25/2009

by SSreporters on Sep 18, 2009 4:27 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's not new to the team

but he’s a new weapon that the Niners didn’t have to deal with last year.

by ninjasocks on Sep 18, 2009 4:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So Shawntae Spencer is new too?

Since he got hurt last year in Seattle and missed the rest of the season. Guess it’s a good thing our secondary has so much depth at corner.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 18, 2009 4:50 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Except when he's played. Like last Sunday

I know one of his career INTs came against, what’s his name… the QB in Seattle. Hopefully he’ll gather another on Sunday.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 18, 2009 11:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

You can't sleep on anyone in the NFL

The Cards slept on Bruce last week and what happened? We saw that and threw a 50 yard bomb. So the people that are saying that Morgan and Bruce are non-threats, well I think that if your coaching staff thinks that, then they’re gonna have a rude awakening

by Drew K on Sep 18, 2009 4:28 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Must win against seattle

I think coach Sing said it the best,“We have been 1-0 before”. If the niners are for real, they will beat Seattle here at home. I like Hill, he rises up to the occasion (just like Joe? well maybe not just yet). In practice he was missing that 50 yards pass he hit to Bruce during the game, his focus Intensifies under pressure, just what we needed.
The fact that Seattle beat the Rams means little, the seahawks need to prove something also, so it may come down to another 4th quarter drive by Hill to win the game.

by RogerRadium on Sep 19, 2009 8:19 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"We'll see them again in the playoffs." -- Coach Mike Singletary after a gut-wrenching week 3 loss to the Vikings.
Start posting about the 49ers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dave_small
Week 11 Prediction Games
Howtheyscoredcat_small
Official Alex Smith [Over]Reaction Thread: Bears Edition
Small
Alex Smith vs Aaron Rodgers(updated)
Small
The Titans/Niners play-by-play
Dave_small
Week 10 Prediction Games

Recent FanPosts

Small
10 things the 49ers should not do
Italian_flag_small
Still think the Niners will reach the playoffs???
2305d0d49c908218_small
Packers fan with some questions
49ers_small
I have a feeling about this particular road game
Joe_and_bill_small
49ers QB - 2010
Small
Jimmy Raye - Ken Whisenhunt
Small
Niners Nation hits the big time
Shaun_hill_small
SINGLETARY WAS HIRED BECAUSE OF SHAUN HILL !!
Howtheyscoredcat_small
Week 10 Prediction Games: The Riveting Results

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Mobile Live
Eagles shuffle linebackers again
Mobile Live
The VRR: Redskins (3-6) @ Cowboys (6-3)
Mobile Live
Antonio Pierce out indefinitely

SPONSORS


Head Ball Coach

Dave_small Fooch

Editors

Jerry_rice_small ProfessorBigelow

Assistant Coaches

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

Pixies_logo_small Florida Danny

M_12a62905a0324d2da2f43ddaf62c630f_small Ninjames

Duct_tape_bandit_small Josh from Hollywood

Crab_tree_small briandean

Moderators

Jackalope_card_small wjackalope