Focus on: Seahawks @ 49ers
Another big division match-up is upon us Nation. This week the Seahawks come to the 'Stick, and we plan to stick it to them (get it???). First of all business... Congrats to howtheyscored for winning the CaptionThis contest with the gem above. Amusing, and true; Frank Gore oozes awesomeness. Also, for the Niners Nation 3 fantasy league, yours truly and my team, The Ed Hochuli Gun Show, is in first place in Division 1, while Shulkdog's landsharks leads division two, after dominating victories by each team. 49erLou is in deaaaaad last, only scoring 55 points. Ouch...
OK now time to focus. One bird down, one to go. This is a very exciting match up that I pray plays out the way we are all hoping. Now, I'm a bit disappointed in the lack of trash talking between Field Gulls and NN - wayy too much dwelling on the Rams victory for FG, and a bit too much focus on Crabtree for NN. We have an amazing matchup here people!! Just look below at these amazing match-ups and players to Focus On:
Key Match-up: 49ers O-Line vs Seahawks D-Line
Last week we witnessed the 49ers struggle to get a real running game started with Frank Gore. Glen Coffee was thrown in there to mix it up once or twice, but a lack-of-run-O was not from a fault in the RB's, it was the O-Line not doing their job. Chilo Rachal and Adam Snyder looked lost at time, especially once the AZ DE's got past them and to Gore. Joe Staley and David Bass weren't impressive either, and it will take a dramatic improvement from all four to get this "Run-First"/"Gore-centric"/60-40 running-passing style team to a victory.
Their challenge will not be simple as they will be going face to face with the Seattle D-Line, including good strength and talent from Patrick Kerny, and Cory Redding from the DE positions. It also won't just be their front four - expect to see Lofa Tatupu and their first-round pick Aaron Curry attempting to cause chaos on one side of the line so that someone slips-through unnoticed, a common event in last weeks Niners game.
In the end, I'm confident in the ability the Niners have on their O-Line, and feel like they SHOULD be able to slow down the Seattle D enough to let Frank the Tank do his magic work. However, the Niners never stop surprising me (for better or worse) and we could be walking into a sack-lunch (num-num-num-num). Unlikely as I see it, but possible given the Seattle talent.
After the jump: Player to Watch, Player to Loath, Fantasy Superstar/Sleeper, and some more SF/Seattle Prep..
This is an easy one for this game. The last time VD played Seattle in SF he was kicked off the field by Coach Singletary in the 3rd quarter. If I were VD, I would be out for blood - I would want to prove that no-one puts baby in the corner and gets away with it. If he truly is the "NEW AND IMPROVED" VD, then he should be Shaun Hill's #1 passing option in this game. Short dump off passes over the middle, allowing VD to lay into some Seattle LBs, put a hurting on their D, or just simply run away from them all. If VD wants to show that those Under Armour commercials meant something, today is his best opportunity to step out of the shadow that is un-sportsmanship (is that a word?) and step out as one of the 49ers captains and leaders on the field.
Player to loathe: Matt Hasselbeck
This is another unreasonable personal bias that I have about a division QB (you're next Bulger...). I've always seen Hasselbeck as a decent QB, but an exceptional game-manager at best. When Seattle went to the Super Bowl, it was Shaun Alexander, not Hasselbeck, that was the bedrock of the offense. And yet we get to see the Seattle QB in countless, awful commercials that just make me feel sick. Chunky Soup - Matt Hasselbeck is not tough. EAS Myoplex, that "Now I'm Done" line is the most douch-chilling line in all of sports commercials, and Hasselbeck sounds like he's going to be late for his Pokemon-card battle in the commercial. I will never, ever use Expedia because of the two worst commercials ever made, here and here. Oh, and his brother is AWFUL on ESPN (Unrelated? Yes. Untrue? Hell no). Now, I'm not saying I want to see Matt Hasselbeck injured, but IF Patrick Willis were to break his jaw, I wouldn't be disappointed in the lack of new Hasselbeck commercials.
Fantasy Superstar?
This week is tough. I'm unsure about how the Niners front O-line will play, so I'm hesitant to chose Gore. While Issac Bruce had a huge 50-yard catch, its hard to pick with any certainty which WR (if any) will be the main target this week. On the Seattle side of the ball, Hasselbeck can sling it around, but a not over-talented WR corps, with an aging Deon Branch, an over-hyped "Slippery" Nate Burleson and a "I'm an amazing #2, and a halfway-decent #1" T.J Houshamazilly, may hold Hasselbeck back. That being said, I'll have to go with the player who has the best potential of making that one-play, 12 point play that wins a week for you, so T.J.Houshmandzadeh, the honor is yours.
Fantasy Surprise?
I'm going to go with the Niners D. Seattle did drop a 28-spot on the Rams last week, but our D held the much-vaunted AZ Offense to just 16 points! It seems like Sing has got this group firing on all cylinder, and if they can get in Hasselbeck's face they can squeeze out a few sacks, or even turn-overs out of the "Pro-Bowl QB". Would I start them this week? It would depend on the other D's on your roster/on waiver wire, but unless you have a Pittsburgh/Philadelphia/Baltimore/Tennessee/NYG/Minnesota on your team, you should feel ok starting the Niners D.
And to top it all off, some random Seattle/SF facts:
- The Niners and Cardinals have only met 20 times in their history (since Seattle was in the AFC West until the NFL re-aligned their teams in 2002 with the addition of the Houston Texans. Seattle holds a 11-9 lead in the all-time series.
- The Niners have never shut-out the Seahawks. Seattle has done it twice (the last one being in 2007).
- Remember when Jim Mora Jr. was our D Coordinator? The man is now the HC in Seattle, taking over for Mike Holmgren. I've always liked him, but now I have to hate him. Sorry Jim. But don't worry, you still had a hand in creating the greatest after-game post conference in NFL history in 2001, at the expense of the 40-21 beat down you helped apply to your Dad and the Indianapolis Colts.
- The Niners have won five of their past six games. Four of those wins are wins earned after we were eliminated from playoff contention last year, but still, I like seeing trends.
Looking a bit ahead...
Don't get injured guys, next week vs. Minnesota is a HUGE game where we may test how good this team is outside the NFC West. But first thing's first - get to 2-0!
GO NINERS!
54 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Bald is beautiful
Shaun Alexander, not Hasselbeck, that was the bedrock of the offense
In 2007, the Seahawks had absolutely no running game. Shaun decided that he didn’t want to be tackled so, when he got the ball, he’d sit down (or fall backwards) when barely touched. Matt took the offense on his shoulders and had a career year.
Hasselbeck is older now. Let's see if he still hits it
I think he still does. But let’s see if his old bones don’t break first
by 49ersAllTheWay on Sep 19, 2009 9:55 AM PDT up reply actions
Selective Quotations
You forgot the beginning of the sentence…
When Seattle went to the Super Bowl, it was Shaun Alexander, not Hasselbeck, that was the bedrock of the offense.
2007 was a different year, a year where Alexander forgot how to be a RB. I know that Hasselbeck is a proven SB QB, but now I can only see him as a game manager at best (similar to Shaun Hill).
Blind devotion.
by ProfessorBigelow on Sep 19, 2009 10:04 AM PDT up reply actions
More quotes
I’ve always seen Hasselbeck as a decent QB, but an exceptional game-manager at best.
Hasselbeck had career numbers in 2007 with an offense that had no run game, no TEs and Bobby Engram as the number one receiver. That sounds like a better than “decent QB”. In 2007, the Hawks were a freak snow storm away from the NFC Championship game (they were dominating on dry grass but were too small in the snow).
When Seattle went to the Super Bowl, it was Shaun Alexander, not Hasselbeck, that was the bedrock of the offense.
In 2005, the strength of the Hawks’ offense was the running game. When you have something special like that, you don’t want to take chances trying to do amazing things with the passing game. The run game is safer and allows you to control the clock. Hasselbeck wasn’t the star of the offense that year, but he was in 2006 and 2007.
So they weren't good enough in 2007. And yet another excuse
What we do know is that Hass had his best years under Homgren. Much like Favre had most every great year under his tutelage. How will Hass perform without the future HOFer, especially that he is now older?
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
Hasselbeck isn't a journeyman POS like Hill
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Sep 19, 2009 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions
Them's fightin' words!
Yeah, I don’t mind half of the stuff folks here think is insulting to the Hawks (the seachicken stuff, etc). Comparing Matt Hasselbeck to Shaun Hill is not acceptable. Its almost as bad as Steelers fans trying to say that our beer sucks.
I'm sure you comparing Curry to Willis is much much better
Shaun Hill hasn’t had a full season to play so the verdict isn’t out on that (yet). Curry has only had one game and you’re saying already that he is more athletic and better than Willis…
Im gonna give you a big Chris Berman, “C’MON MANNN!”
Don't worry ninjasocks
Come tomorrow it won’t be us insulting the hawks it will be the hawks insulting their fans “you” by getting their feathery butts handed to them by the 49ers!! woop woop
Management decided to franchise him instead of paying him, so when he got the money he F(site decorum) them!!
AKA.............Optimist Prime
Banned in 13 comments from the Gulls and I am proud!!
You are banned from Field Gulls.
Herring is like penicillin
I don’t really know who’ll cover VD yet, but we’ve got a pretty good group of guys to get it done.
Will Herring, Leroy Hill’s replacement, is a former converted safety that is arguably better in coverage (and maybe a little worse in run defense) than Hill. Aaron Curry is a heat-seeking cruise missile who could shut down VD, but you also might see him in run defense or involved in the pass rush. I could also see one of our safeties get in on the action or even a DE on a zone blitz.
The great thing about the new (offensive and defensive) schemes is that you never know what to expect.
Aaron Curry can't cover VD.
First, he’s not fast enough, not nearly fast enough. Second, VD is bigger and stronger than Curry as well as faster – check out his blocking on D-linemen. Third, Curry doesn’t have the technique yet. He’s still a rookie who hasn’t adjusted to the speed of the game and the size/strength of opponents. If Curry mans up on VD, VD wins. I doubt Mora is dumb enough to allow something like that. And Herring is a joke, a marginal player who can be replaced by any number of players waiting for that phone call. The Seahawks will miss L. Hill on Sunday and Gore will run right over Herring.
by MontanaPass on Sep 19, 2009 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions
Seriously?
Dude, I watched the game against the Rams. How was he athletic? Do you mean because he was able to run faster than the Rams Tackles??? Harldy athletic. However, I did see Willis drop back in to coverage and leap in the air to make an interception. Willis has been to the Probowl twice out of his first two years and Curry had a mediocre 4 tackles in his first game against the Rams. Vernon is one of the fastest guys on our team…I will put his .40 time against Curry’s anyday as well as his game speed. What a ridiculous comparison. Parys Haralson is even better than Curry.
You must be high
Someone put something in your Starbucks? A rookie LB is going to shut down Vernon and is more athletic than Willis. You guys don’t bring the smarts that’s for sure.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
JOKE!
by Sultan_of_Seitan (formerly Deific16) on Sep 19, 2009 2:36 PM PDT up reply actions
No he isnt.....Forty time says enough about that.
Pick up your britches when he’s done with you!!
AKA.............Optimist Prime
Banned in 13 comments from the Gulls and I am proud!!
You are banned from Field Gulls.
Slightly slower 40 but he has 15 more pounds of muscle.
Strap 15 pounds to Willis and they will be running identical 40 time.
Adding 15 lbs won't slow your forty
That’s a myth, Peterson doesn’t look slower and I increased my forty time when I added weight. Curry is not faster and more athletic than Willis, sorry!
AKA.............Optimist Prime
Banned in 13 comments from the Gulls and I am proud!!
You are banned from Field Gulls.
"I'm a bit disappointed in the lack of trash talking between Field Gulls and NN"
You really are tolerant to allow it to go on all week. I hope everyone had fun and nobody’s feelings got hurt. I’m looking forward to a good competitive game.
ok, I guess
I think John Morgan is a little less tolerant of dirty words and ad hominem than Fooch. Some NN guys might not last too long there.
lol just ask rlott42
It was Johnny Hopkins, and Sloan Kettering, and they were blazin that s*** up everyday.
Yup
Scolari is mostly tolerated over at FG. rlott42 has a hard time disagreeing without being disagreeable.
Discuss that with John Morgan
You know they guy that will ban you for trash talking!
AKA.............Optimist Prime
Banned in 13 comments from the Gulls and I am proud!!
You are banned from Field Gulls.
Seahawks 23 49ers 13
Hard to argue with the D-line about to be unleashed.
by Rockoutwithyourhawkout on Sep 19, 2009 10:12 AM PDT reply actions
Fooch, I'm a bit disappointed with your straight up lack of objectivity.
Hasselbeck, a 3x Pro-Bowler 3 of the 4 complete seasons he’s played, a good game-manager? One of the most deepest WR corps. in the league, bad?
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
Oh, that explains it.
Carry on.
"Part, fools!
Put up your swords. You know not what you do."
by Fearless Frog on Sep 19, 2009 11:00 AM PDT up reply actions
hey thanks for calling me out Professor
:(
It was Johnny Hopkins, and Sloan Kettering, and they were blazin that s*** up everyday.
Sorry man
You know I love ya, I just have to keep you on your toes, to make sure you don’t forget about the league. If I go in last place (never happen) I’ll call myself out on it
Blind devotion.
by ProfessorBigelow on Sep 19, 2009 6:26 PM PDT up reply actions
it's all good
I won’t forget the league, now i’m on a mission to redeem my good name lol
It was Johnny Hopkins, and Sloan Kettering, and they were blazin that s*** up everyday.
Took a look around Field Gulls board,
It’s a little sterile with everyone going back and forth preaching to the choir.
Bad Karma bud
…Now, I’m not saying I want to see Matt Hasselbeck injured, but IF Patrick Willis were to break his jaw, I wouldn’t be disappointed in the lack of new Hasselbeck commercials.
Why? Why would you ever say this? As a Seahawk fan, and a football fan, never, I repeat, NEVER would I ever wish injury on another player. And imho, not being disappointed if it actually happend is just as pathetic. Watch what you wish for, it might turn around and bite you in the…
Crabs to sign TODAY ???
I don’t trust this site as far as you can throw them,BUT ,what does anyone know about their statement that Crabs will sign his contract TODAY ? (Sat.)
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/257621-crabtree-will-sign-saturday
Bleacher Report?
A bleacher report article with no links? I’ll file this under, if I’m not going to say anything nice, don’t say anything at all.
However, I’m definitely gonna watch the Texas-Texas Tech game tonight since Crabtree is supposed to be there.
by David Fucillo on Sep 19, 2009 11:47 AM PDT up reply actions
I totally enjoy the article regarding Mil Kiper
No one can ever predict who goes where and when ! Kiper is total LOSER !!!!
by LASVEGASNINER on Sep 19, 2009 12:12 PM PDT up reply actions
I'll say it..
The Onion is more credible than Reacher Report. What next? An article from Weekly World News on how Crabtree will be abducted by aliens from another galaxy to play for them this season?
Well, we're waiting....
Fooch
The paragraph about Hasselbeck…HILARIOUS!!! Classic.
We haven’t really ever had trouble running the ball on Seattle. It has always been all the other elements of the game we have failed on. I think our team is improved but thier team is also improved (from last year). Just how much is the real question. They’ve got a bunch of guys sitting still and a few more that will be playing banged up. We need to pass earlier on in the game. The reason that 49 yard pass was successful, was because we were going to Vernon in the middle of the field and on that particular play Vernon cut across the middle of the field which drew the safety in and then there was single coverage in which Bruse beat bad. Anyway, I think if we can rack up 250 or so yards of passing, we’ll be successful in the run. But the O-line does need to elevate thier game a notch or two.
I Think
Last week was a little bit of a mirage when it came to the offensive line play, they have looked real good all pre-season and training camp and one game cannot change the abilities of Rachal and Snyder.
Okay back to the Seattle game. I think the 49ers can exploit Seattle’s injury issue. Branch and TJ will most likely play but are banged up. Considering the job Clements, Spencer and Bly did against Arizona’s receiving corp which is better the Seattle’s hands down i see no reason why that cannot shutdown the Seahawks passing game, at least on the outside. Carlson is another problem. Weather it is Willis, Spikes or Goldsen on him the 49ers need to take that option away from Hasselbeck. Walter Jones may indeed play just a month removed from surgery but how affective will he be against the pass rush of Justin Smith, Ray McDonald and Parys Haralson? If we can disrupt the timing routes and force Hasselbeck out of the pocket then the defense will once again be dominant. We do have one of the best rush defenses in the conference so i do look for Jones to be contained and be somewhat of a non factor.
On offense it comes down to the offensive line and weather or not they will step up after last weeks disgusting performance. If they can maintin what we saw in the preseason then we will move the chains. Hill doesn’t make many mistakes. Only 8 INT in 11 career starts, if he can avoid any mistakes the 49ers should not have a problem scoring on Seattle’s questionable defense. Leroy Hill and Marcus Trufant will not play. Totupu and Mebane are both banged up and not a full speed. Those are Seattle’s 4 best defensive players. The secondary is average at best especially without Trufant. Morgan, Davis and Bruce should find themselves open as Seattle looks to play a soft man coverage. That will open up the inside routes for Davis and Gore. Brandon Jones adds another dimension to the 49ers offense playing the slot which will allow us to have our 4 best WR’s on the field on passing downs. Battle or Jones are better then Seattle’s 4th defensive back and i think San Francisco can exploit that. I do hope to see Glen Coffee in the game more though
by nocal81(Vincent) on Sep 19, 2009 12:03 PM PDT reply actions
I got one problem with Niners OL
After reviewing ALL the stats , one thing that showed up that bother me was 4 penalties against the Niners. Not all thoses pentalties was against the Ol. The noise didn’t seem to affect them as bad as the Coach said. Major Concern this weekend !
Hey, try some End around runs. Wouldn’t Sheets be better suited for that ? Maybe Robinson would be a all around Player but did he touch the the ball as a runner ? And when he does, it’s rare. Try Sheets and we may be surprise what may happen !
by LASVEGASNINER on Sep 19, 2009 7:59 PM PDT up reply actions
Bleacher Report is quiote often wrong BUT...still worth looking into.
CRABTREE WILL SIGN SATURDAY by Kyam Rune
Contributor Written on September 19, 2009
CRABTREE FINALLY GET’S IT!
It’s been a long time but the first round draft pick realizes that he will lose more by not signing then he will gain by holding out.
It’s gonna be a happy day on Saturday for the hard hitting team in San Francisco. It’s not official yet but word is that the kid from Texas Tech might have finally made a decision and pushed his agent to “get it done!”
-———————————————————
Not exacly like ESPN and the NFL Network were reporting it,but at least it seems something to ask you (Matt) to look into. I doubt that one nobody on one unreliable web site has the story and nobody else has it,but who knows.
This is an amazing West matchup
These teams are 3-3 vs each other the past three years, with each team 2-1 on the road. Last year SF won the game Hass started, yet lost the one he didn’t. Anything is possible. Interestingly, for a series that’s even the past three seasons only one game (O.T. in Seattle last year) has been close throughout and came down to the gun. I could certainly see both games this year being that tight.
For the Field Gulls posters who bloviate about last season’s matchups as some verdict toward this season: Nolan, his hybrid defense and replay foolishness are gone. Martz and his clock mismanagement are gone. JTO started both games and is gone. On their end, Holmgren and D.C. John Marshall are gone. These are two newer teams who have familiarity with most of each others players but whose schemes and head coaches have changed at least somewhat.
Should be a very good game. It’s worth West supremacy in September. Both teams have new leaders at the top and being 2-0 in the division is a great way for that coach to prove his way is working. It could show Hass is back and fine. Or that Hill will be the guy to lead us to the playoffs. I also believe the Niners offense is a work in progress being a new system. I expect them to be better after the bye than before it, so the more wins that can be racked up now the better this season will be.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
Agreed
I think one could make the argument that the low light of last weeks game against the Cards was our O-line… You think they will perform better this week? The Hawks run a 4-3 and last week we faced a 3-4…that could make a difference one way or another
One time the cards did
was they stack the LIne with 5 players.They didn’t play for the pass when Hill went 9/13 for the winning TD. Our luck !!!
by LASVEGASNINER on Sep 19, 2009 8:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Frank Gore needs a good game.

And Seattle has a history of giving them to him. If our play-calling isn’t horrible, then he should do some ass-kicking tomorrow.
Let’s just keep them honest with our passing game, and do a little more run blocking.
Please?
"Those boos really motivate me to make something happen." - Bonds
The run game, etc...
I’m sure the running game will come through. As Persiflage put it, Seattle has a history of giving Gore a lot of room to operate. Just check out his highlights against them. I don’t think Curry, nor any of those current players, will make much of a difference in stopping the 49ers run. In my opinion, the only thing that will factor into the success or failure of the run game will be Coach Jimmy Ray. If he makes adjustments to how the defense plays the run, then 49ers will succeed in running the ball. Many fans were quick to point this out last week, and I think they were right on. In looking back at it, Coach Ray failed to mix up the run plays despite the fact that the Cardinals kept stacking up the box with 8-9 men on almost every play. I saw the entire game and don’t recall seeing a single toss play (although I may be wrong), instead a great majority were just “up the gut”, and that was it. The Cardinals I’m sure, going into the game, were gearing up to stop Frank from running up the middle, because teams in the league already know that Frank is great at running between the tackles, and not to the outside. Coach Ray didn’t seem to have an answer for this. Well, if Seattle does the same this week and is successful in stopping Frank from running the ball up the middle, let’s all hope Coach Ray changes up the run attack and calls for some toss plays.
I don’t know how the game will go, but I expect the 49ers to pull this one out. I wasn’t impressed with Seattle’s shutout of the Rams, and neither should any of you.
One last thing. What’s all this talk about Aaron Curry? The guy has played in only one game, and everyone is talking about him. On top of that, he ONLY had like… 4 tackles… and that was it!
(That pic of Frank was hilarious)
by Waiting4JoshMorgan on Sep 19, 2009 6:15 PM PDT reply actions

by 
































