Mike Singletary Approval Rating, Week 2
ESPN.com has their NFL Head Coach Ratings up and in week 2 Mike Singletary is leading with a 96% approval rating. That's surprisingly close to our approval rating from last week, which sits at 97%. 38 folks actually voted no, and I have to say I'm curious how it plays out this week. Also, last week we had 1,893 votes. ESPN's week 2 Singletary votes are at 1,918, so let's try and surpass the World Wide Leader.
Things started out great in week 1 and now they've only managed to improve in week 2. The 49ers may not have completely run away with the win against Seattle, but they did bring the punishment. The team is clearly going to be a very physical team this season and other teams best be prepared for it. Given the use of the nutcracker drill and all the padded practices, does this really surprise anybody?
What will be interesting to see is how the team holds up over the course of the season. Will they be worn down come November and December? A quick look at their schedule shows what should be two exceedingly winnable games to end the season versus Detroit and at St. Louis. Not guarantees, but games good teams win handily. Before that though the team goes to Seattle, hosts Arizona and heads to Philadelphia.
In looking at the whole physical training camp issue, I guess there are two divergent schools of thought: 1) The team will wear down later in the season from the tough start, or 2) the team will actually be just as strong in December because they've conditioned themselves accordingly. I tend to lean towards getting worn down, but maybe Coach Singletary's motivational abilities can help overcome that. I'm not really sure at this point and guess we'll just have to wait and see. I don't think the approval rating has anything to do with this issue, but I'd be curious to hear what folks have to say on this issue. It's something we discussed during the preseason, but I think it's something worth re-hashing now that the team is off to a nice start.
0 recs |
67 comments
|
Comments
Tough camp
I think they hold up just fine. 1 of the reports I read was that since camp the schedule is no where near as grueling with them generally only hitting on gameday. This leads me to believe that any issues that would lead to injury due to contact were handled with the preseason contact level.
It was Baas’ foot I think that had always bugged him that broke and is better now than ever. We’ve got a hardened team that frankly appears to hold up really well on the injury front. How much of that is luck we may never know, but I’ll take our camp style and results over the Seahawks current situation any day.
by Dave R. on Sep 22, 2009 11:26 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
No vote
Can the person who voted no explain why they disapprove?
by Fooch on Sep 22, 2009 11:45 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
yes please
if you voted no please give a reason why, because I can only imagine the people voting no are fans of another team
It was Johnny Hopkins, and Sloan Kettering, and they were blazin that s*** up everyday.
by 49erLou on Sep 22, 2009 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are these polls...
for registered members only?
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Sep 22, 2009 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
SEA fans are probably voting NO
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by chikmagnet_565 on Sep 22, 2009 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can you explain why you think they'll be worn down
opposed to being conditioned enough to carry through end of the season? Do you have anything that you’re basing that off of, or…?
I think by December 32 teams out of 32 are pretty worn down. I think the real argument, is how much more did Singletary put these guys through to prepare them to “finish” the season out. The mental aspect is huge for all teams that want to be contenders
by Drew K on Sep 22, 2009 4:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Quite frankly
I think a study (which might not exist) needs to be cited before anybody can say which is more likely to be the case with any confidence. This thread is rife with speculation and subjective anecdotal evidence. For me, I’ll watch with a combination of caution and optimism, and just wait to see whether the team looks strong, weak, or regular in the final leg of the season.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Sep 22, 2009 5:29 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
My anecdotal two cents
I recall how Bill Walsh always had a great December record and Seifert after him. Same for Joe Gibbs. Both men also had excellent playoff records. This was usually credited to their lightening the practices throughout the season. I never recall training camp being an issue, but it should also be noted that for the majority of their respective careers they had veteran teams who could use more rest but also be trusted to stay sharp and prepare appropriately.
On the flip side, it was speculated that Schottenheimer’s Browns and Chiefs, Mora’s Saints and even Ditka’s Bears often wore down in December in January due to practicing their teams in pads all year.
If I am recalling the non-Niner teams correctly, it would seem that training camp has little to no bearing on wearing a team down and as has been argued, may actually have more of a benefit. I’ll be paying more attention to how the team practices once we reach the second half of the season.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Sep 22, 2009 11:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm worried
Perhaps it is the psychology of someone that has been a Niners fan for too long, but I have reasons to think this success will not continue. After all, we did the same thing under Nolan last year. Many football experts, in explaining our wins, put emphasis on physical defense and mental toughness, while ignoring signs that the offense was seriously dysfunctional. Shaun Hill has not displayed even the signs on someone that is going to even be able to “Trent Dilfer” us into the playoffs. We are a Frank Gore injury from disaster.
by Bitey on Sep 22, 2009 11:52 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Most every team is one injury away from disaster
NE lost Brady and missed the playoffs. Yes, they won 11 games but the standards there are SB or bust. They busted. Tennesse lost their home playoff game when Johnson went out with an injury. The NYG went in the hole when their one playmaking WR ended his season due to stupidity.
Take away Brees, Warner, Rodgers, Manning or Ryan at the QB position; Peterson or Gore at RB spot and those teams are unlikely to win anywhere near as many games as they otherwise would’ve. A great team can survive injuries and still win more than they lose but certain guys are irreplaceable.
I do understand your worry. No winning seasons since 2002 and no realistic winning expectations since 2003 leave most people a little insecure about success. I would argue that the offense, while flawed, is not dysfunctional. The ability to have long drives in both games is something the Niners of 2007 could not do against anyone. It’s also important to remember that we have a new coordinator thus there should be continual improvement over the course of the season. I don’t know what the ceiling is but it has not been reached. We also just played two division opponents, the teams that know us best. What we do @ Minnesota and later vs Atlanta will show how lesser known opponents deal with us and we with them.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Sep 22, 2009 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
No long drives in 2007?
My buddy Kwame had a lot to do with that. The entire offensive line was in shambles that year.
by bignerd on Sep 22, 2009 2:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kwame, Dilfer, Hostler...
No threats at WR. So many issues on that team.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Sep 22, 2009 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shaun Hill
Has had 2 game winning drives since starting in the NFL.. The most current, against AZ, he threw 13 out of the 15 plays downfield and scored a TD pass to Gore. Get him some weapons and he will be fine.
If we swapped receivers with Arizona or New England…how do you see the outcome of that?
Hill will be fine for the team until Davis can get a few more seasons under his belt. Who knows maybe in between we get an even better prospect. Tom Brady was a 6th round pick and Montana a third 3rd round pick…so you just never know…BUT like I said, out of the last 4 QB’s we have had, Hill has hands down been the best in leading this team to WINS
by Drew K on Sep 22, 2009 5:16 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Two things about Hill scare me: the rainbows and the fumbles. No matter who the receivers are, those will end up hurting the team eventually. We already got extremely lucky not to lose one of his fumbles (and we did lose the other), and we’ve been very, very fortunate to have receivers knock away a few sure picks on those patented rainbows.
Hill’s a fine quarterback and I like him as much as any rational person, but he needs to reign these two things in if he doesn’t want to be a liability later on.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Sep 22, 2009 5:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hill is no Montana...and NEVER will be, No one will...
However, I will say this in comparison… Montana did not have the best arm, this is a known fact. What was impressive about Montana was his evident leadership, his accuracy, and his ability to make quick decisions…. It didn’t hurt either that he had Dwight clark and Freddie Solomon to throw to and then later the best receiver to ever play (Jerry Rice), and then John Taylor, Brent Jones, and Roger Craig…as well as Rathman that could catch out of the backfield.
Anyway, I think Hill may not have the “best” arm, or all the intangables that go with being a Peyton Manning or anything close…but he has demonstraded leadership, the ability to drive his way downfield to finish a game out…so in my mind, all he is missing is the “weapons” surrounding besides the obvious in Gore.
by Drew K on Sep 22, 2009 6:08 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Montana's accuracy was deadly
And his knowledge of the system incredible.
As for pocket presence, I don’t know how good Hill can be but my hope is that little things like this get better with playing time. He’s still only started 12 games.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Sep 22, 2009 11:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And as
bad as a mofo as Montana was, lets not forget that he was human and made mistakes and bad decisions…
I think that what Montana lacked, he made up for in other ways. I’ve said this over and over, Hill will not be a Montana, just not in the cards and too late in his career. If he fine tunes certain areas of his game though, he has an opportunity with Coach Singletary to be a really good QB.
Jim McMahon wasn’t great but I thought he was decent enough. In the 86 Suoerbowl, he had 0 TD’s and 0 picks…even though he ran it in twice haha. I think Hill can eventually be better than a Jim McMahon
by Drew K on Sep 23, 2009 12:02 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And I agree
He does need to improve on his pocket presence…. but I think that a QB can be good and not necessarily “have to” have an explosive cannon…although it can help… There’s also the other side of that too…guys like JaMarcus Russell have incredible arms but zero accuracy.
Hill certainly has alot of work to do to be a really good QB… I do admire his leadership though and his “teamplayer” mentality
by Drew K on Sep 22, 2009 6:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s not the weak arm that worries me so much as the sheer tendency of the throws to rainbow.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Sep 22, 2009 9:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And I recognize that the two are related, but they’re also not necessarily partnered. He can control rainbowing, whether that means changing something in his motion, eliminating those particularly deep throws altogether, or something else altogether.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Sep 22, 2009 9:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
My point though...
If he can be consistent with the 10-15 yard passes and get a little on it AND we have a “playmaker” (someone who can score anywhere on the field i.e. a little YAC in to TD value from somebody)…then Hill would be more effective.
Jerry Rice, a majority of the time caught the 10-15- 20 yarders over the middle of the field and then racked up the YAC with a high percentage of scores. That was his bread and butter. On occasion he’d run under a 40-45 yarder from Joe, (some longer with Steve cause he obv had a better arm), and scored but it wasn’t the majority and it was all timing. Hill demonstrated he has the ability to time a pass (rainbow and all) with the one he threw to Bruce against AZ. But there were a few in that game that were 15-25 downfield that made my heart sink to the ground (“scared me” as well)…. So there is work to be done. I just think there is alot of people that don’t see potential cause he isn’t your prototype QB. BUT just because he is not, does not equal a lack of potential. I think you could argue the point that every QB in the NFL has some sort of weakness to one extent to another
Like I said though, no where near either of the two mentioned above(Joe and Steve) just using them for the sake of making the point. I think it kind of goes without saying that if he has playmakers, it increases his stats as well as ability to score through the passing game. Right now, we have nobody that can bust a 40 yard TD after catching a 10 yard pass with maybe the exception of Gore and Vernon (but Vernon has yet to do so, at least on a regular basis).
And I hate to bring him up, however, I think Crabtree (despite all the crap talk about him being a diva and all the contract junk going on), he can help on the grid-iron. And if not, then we definitely need help at the WR position; think its evident
by Drew K on Sep 22, 2009 9:45 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think we basically agree. Some things about Hill scare me, and I do believe that if he doesn’t fix a few of them that they will hurt us, but I really think he does a lot of things well and that there’s no reason to believe his most glaring issues are things that can’t be addressed, because they really seem to be.
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Sep 22, 2009 9:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Especially with the guidance of SIngletary
If he’s gonna excel under anyone, it’s definitley the head coach we have right now
by Drew K on Sep 22, 2009 9:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's correct as written.
It’s a double negative: “There is no reason to believe his issues can not be addressed” = “There is no reason to believe his issues can not be addressed.”
Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.
by howtheyscored on Sep 22, 2009 10:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry
This concept of a ‘tough camp’ in July/August wearing the team down in December is kinda laughable.
It didn’t hurt Lombardi’s Packers. It sure didn’t hurt Singletary’s Bears, who not only had a tough, physical camp but probably had the toughest practices during the season.
It didn’t hurt Jimmy Johnson’s SB winning 1993 Cowboys, when he ran an even tougher camp after they had just won the SB in 1992.
It does help explain why they outplayed Arizona and Seattle (both of whom had ‘soft’ camps).
Sorry.
by GeoMak on Sep 22, 2009 11:56 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Yup
I’ve heard stories about how Ditka and Buddy Ryan hated each other so much that the Bears were having full blown offense vs defense grudge matches all week long.
I think the conditioning only helped them.
Go Mike Singletary!
by Fridge72 on Sep 22, 2009 2:58 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The players used to look forward to Sundays
It was easier playing the opponent that their opposite unit in practice.
by GeoMak on Sep 22, 2009 3:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hopefully we become that sorta team...
But it would be really great if 31 other teams felt the complete opposite when playing us.
by agchee on Sep 22, 2009 5:22 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
tough camp
I’m not saying it will definitely happen, I’m just pointing out that it’s something to keep in mind as the team moves along. Yes it worked for the team’s you pointed out, but I bet there are teams that it didn’t work out for quite as well. As a 49ers fan it’s just something I am not going to dismiss until we get through the end of the season.
by Fooch on Sep 22, 2009 8:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Being overworked (or underworked) in and of itself means little.
Guys like JJ, Lombardi and Ryan/Ditka succeeded not because they worked their teams hard. They succeeded because they were great coaches, who developed great players.
Working those players as hard as they did was but one aspect of their coaching philosophy and overall picture.
Rod Marinelli (the former Marine) worked his players hard as HC of the Lions. 0-16.
49er fans are conditioned to the team not being overworked, as per Bill Walsh.
Bill Walsh built a dynasty in SF, not because of his practice methods, but first and foremost because he authored an innovative system that was ahead of it’s time.
Take the WCO out of the equation and few would be pining for the days of easier camps.
by GeoMak on Sep 22, 2009 8:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It does happen
In the “Americas Game” episode chronicling the 2008 Super Bowl winning season, the Steelers mention the tough training camp Mike Tomlin put the team through in 2007, and Troy P. as well as Tomlin admit that the hard camp wore them down to the point where they “had nothing” in the playoff again against Jacksonville. They also credit said camp with establishing it as Tomlins team, and helping them prepare better and be more conditioned for the 2008 Super Bowl winning season. Just something to think about
by Sloan on Sep 22, 2009 12:13 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
A young team..
needs a tough camp.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Sep 22, 2009 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
and even if the team does wear down in december, in my opinion I still think its worth it in the long run.
by Sloan on Sep 22, 2009 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
also agreed
Young teams can endure a tough camp. If he wasn’t tough on these guys, Gore doesn’t take 8 men in the box without a scratch. When you consider how many top first -round draft picks are on this roster, you realize how many pure athletes there are in SF. Sing is whipping all of them into shape to finally realize their potential.
by t p on Sep 22, 2009 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is a very young team
and if I’m not mistaken, don’t you guys have like 3 1st round picks next year?
by Fridge72 on Sep 22, 2009 2:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
2 First round picks
Ours and Carolinas at the moment
by Sloan on Sep 22, 2009 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's also easier..
To run a tough camp with a young team as opposed to one with a whole lot of Vets. Just ask Tom Coughlin.
The conditioning is paying off at the beginning of the season, where it has had a real impact. That’s where the 49ers can steal games, and dominate teams physically. Later when they gel as a team, then they can add more finesse and open things up more. But they really need to come out hard, and they have so far, and the mental aspect is a true benefit as well.
Singletary has simplified things that Nolan didn’t do, but in fairness to Nolan (who I hate), Singletary doesn’t have the whole weight of the franchise on him either like Nolan had.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Sep 22, 2009 3:01 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like this
It’s important for us all to remember this isn’t just about this season. Sing is trying to change the attitude and culture while improving the team every year through the draft, FA and player development with McC. Though we all have different views on how this season will end, I serioulsy doubt we’ll be playing the SB this year so if this season can be step one to getting back there within a few years and being a consistent winner it’s all worth it.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Sep 22, 2009 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What are the odds for the 49ers to play in the SB and then to win the SB
that’s a bet I wouldn’t mind making
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
by Eastbayjim on Sep 22, 2009 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why not
This past decade has seen a number of long shots get there, tho when I scanned the Vegas lines on this topic back in the summer I noted that even long shots had shorter odds than before. They finally figured out that too much is unpredictable in today’s NFL and I bet a number of people were happily dropping a few bucks on the 10,000 to 1 odds just hoping for a miracle.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Sep 23, 2009 12:01 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This team...
Is ScotM’s team. Singletary does not have the pressure Nolan had, and the dynamic between ScotM and Singletary is more symbiotic than Nolan trying to justify ScotM’s pick of Alex Smith.
The real reason why this team is playing better is because Alex Smith is no longer a focus.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Sep 23, 2009 1:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Will the team wear down?
Well that is an interesting question and based on your teaser I have these thoughts.
In looking at the whole physical training camp issue, I guess there are two divergent schools of thought: 1) The team will wear down later in the season from the tough start, or 2) the team will actually be just as strong in December because they’ve conditioned themselves accordingly. I tend to lean towards getting worn down, but maybe Coach Singletary’s motivational abilities can help overcome that.
The team may in fact find them selves low on fuel toward the end of the season but my thought is that if that happens it won’t be due to the training camp program. In fact the training camp program likely has made them play as well as they have, but if they continue to play as Fysical ( that’s physical with an F) that may in fact be the cause for any late season let down. That is not to say that this will happen however if it does… then what can be done to mitigate this potential problem. 1) If they can continue to develop the back ups to play at the same level as the starters then using fresh horses as often as possible without jeopardizing unit continuity and chemestry. 2) If they can develop the skilled players to a degree that playing level can beat some opponents with needing to beat the crap out of them.
So we will see.
Go Niners….
by WC-Ninerhead on Sep 22, 2009 12:26 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
All teams wear down
Only the strongest will make it to the end.
by LASVEGASNINER on Sep 22, 2009 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
In the end there can be ONLY ONE
No doubt that all teams wear down. Some due to injury at key positions with out quality back up, others lose a close game or two and lose the wind in their sails and never recover, others simply crap out due to a lack of leadership.
The goal is not just to survive the season and be one a done the playoffs, but the goal is be the last one standing and highest score at the end of the SUPER BOWL.
by WC-Ninerhead on Sep 22, 2009 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
physicality
You’re right on the physical stuff. Maybe things work out fine, but playing such physical football could possibly wear them down.
by Fooch on Sep 22, 2009 8:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Giants in 07
I call your attention to the absolutely grueling two games the Giants played in the bitter cold of NY when the Giants won the NFC title game and then the SB. That is the way of a Championship team and that is same kind of effort , pain, and shear will that the Niners are going to have to not only play through, but endure and in some sort of perverse way relish in order to come out as the true champions that they will be. Singletary knows that in his heart a and soul not because he is a good coach, because he has lived it. so all in NN think that is some sort of play time sport for simple viewing and entertainment, you do not know what the the NFL is all about…
by WC-Ninerhead on Sep 22, 2009 10:14 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
They played on the road
in Tampa, Dallas and Green Bay before the SB. And yes, the temperature in GB was bitterly cold.
by GeoMak on Sep 22, 2009 10:17 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Could we possibly start tracking number of plays in our post game analysis?
For ball control teams, which we are, one benefit is reducing the number of plays their defense has to play. Think Miami on Monday night. Horrible loss but their D will be rested heading to San Diego and many more games like that will leave them fresher throughout the year, whereas I’m not sure Indy’s defense will have much left in the tank heading to AZ on a short week.
If our Niners are able to run more plays and win TOP in the majority of games this season, the real physical toll to watch will be on the OL and Gore. This is certainly a change from the past few season when our defense was constantly wearing down from all the 3 & outs from the offense.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Sep 23, 2009 12:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sing in this week's Sports Illustrated
Check it out
Check my 49ers blogs at Mining the Gold Rush and San Francisco 49ers Examiner
by PHUT! on Sep 22, 2009 12:49 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Vikings are stacked.
I think Niners need to play a perfect game to beat the Vikings. One turnover, one stalled drive caused by a flag. The margin for error is tiny. Did anyone watch the Vikings last 2 games. They were awful for the first half, then suddenly decided to start playing in the second half, and totally crushed those teams, won by 14 in both. 60 mins, play ever second of it.
by Dave_M on Sep 22, 2009 1:18 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If by stacked, you mean they have a big booty...
beating the lions and browns by 14 points does nothing for me. A Pete won’t get the breathing room he did last week and old man Farve hasn’t been tested yet. This is an extremely talented and physical defense. The thing that makes the niners different is that they DON’T have to play a perfect game. They only have to play THEIR game…run the ball, eat the clock, take the momentum and ferocity out of the other sideline.
Oh, and what’s up with Jamal Lewis getting 5.2YPC vs this D. Don’t you thin Minnesota needs to play the perfect game?
by t p on Sep 22, 2009 2:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right on. t p,
GOOO..NIIINNNNEEEERRRSS…
by WC-Ninerhead on Sep 22, 2009 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The vikings are like
a poorly tuned Ferrari. Every year they go out and spend a ton of money to get good free-agents and have some great talent on that team. Unfortunately for them they are so consistently mismanaged that it almost always falls apart some time during the season.
At any time during a game though, they can accidentally start clicking despite their coaching staff and management.
by Fridge72 on Sep 22, 2009 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like to make a non-football reference...
MMA Fighters. I watch a lot of fights and unless a fighter gets that quick knock out or submission, its going to come down to cardio. Most fighters can no longer win with just their talents. They have to be in top physical condition. I think the mental aspect is just as important as the physical. They build on each other.
Does the team have the mental toughness in those late two minute drives in 4th on both sides of the ball? Because of the tough camp, the team was able to become physically and mentally stronger and I think that is what will carry them through those tough times.
by agchee on Sep 22, 2009 5:40 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Against Arizona
SF’s D was flat out exhausted when Singletary took that timeout. In a nutshell and don’t quote me word for word, but he said, “I know what its like to be out there and not have anything left but you have to push yourself.”
I think that the players respect that he is an ex-player and I don’t know about you all, but when I can relate to someone, I find it alot easier to listen and follow through
by Drew K on Sep 22, 2009 6:57 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And that philosophy of coaching
goes all the way back to Lombardi. He pushed them harder than they’d ever been pushed before, so that they would be the better conditioned team in the 4th quarter.
That was one of Lombardi’s most famous sayings: “Fatigue makes cowards of us all.”
by GeoMak on Sep 22, 2009 10:19 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's all mental
Like people have mentioned before, every team breaks down at the end of the season. It’s the mentally tough that win games down the stretch. The last few years, we have done pretty well in December, in 2006 we won like 2 out of our last 3, or something like that, and last year, we were 3 and 1. Maybe we need to worry about the middle stretch of the season, where it seems we falter every year.
by crevis1987 on Sep 22, 2009 11:28 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Word brother
I was so tired once in a submission (jujitsu) match that I wanted to quit. The match was tied and I felt I had no energy. After all the guy had me by 60 lbs. But in overtime, after 10 minutes of grappling, my apponent asked the ref for a water break. It was not till he said this that I thought I had a chance. I realized that he was feeling the same way.
Why do I say this? A team mentality is the same way in many aspects. In those tough moments, a player or team has to do the Jean Claude Van Dam reflection on his past training and conditioning in order to pull off the win. Conditioning is huge. I’m all for it. In fact, baring injury, it will only serve us more and more as the season goes on. I will venture to say that there is always room for improvements including improvement in stamina and conditioning. Of course there is an optimal point. But this is for Sing to decide.
I agree with crevis. It is very much mental. That’s why you need a coach to let you know that you can do it. Even though your body says it can’t. Anybody who has competed understands this.
by carbone on Sep 23, 2009 11:56 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 






















