Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Auto Racer Jeffrey Earnhardt Excited to Make MMA Debut

Ask The Daily Norseman about the Minnesota Vikings

Good morning, Niners fans!  I'm Gonzo, and I'm the head blogger over at The Daily Norseman, SBNation's Minnesota Vikings headquarters.

As part of the lead-up to our contest this weekend. . .the only game this week between two teams that are 2-0, thank you very much. . .I'm posting this here to give you good folks the opportunity to ask myself and my co-writers anything you'd like about the Vikings.  Fooch will be posting something similar over at our house, and we'll also be exchanging questions later on in the week.

But, have at it, ladies and gentlemen. . .we'll try to answer any questions you might have in as timely a manner as possible.

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Niners Nation's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Niners Nation's writers or editors.

Comment 142 comments  |  6 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Not really a matchup question

but I see a lot of people refer to AP as AD. P and D are too far apart for it to be a typo, and I’ve seen it too many times. Is it to differentiate from the Associated Press or something? Or am I just seeing the same person who thinks his name is Adrian Deterson?

by Sebaz49 on Sep 23, 2009 9:40 AM PDT reply actions  

They're both right.

AP is obviously his initials, but AD stands for his nickname, “All Day”. As in “hopefully he’ll be running through your defense all day.”

by Eric J. Thompson on Sep 23, 2009 9:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

By the way

I’m Eric, one of the co-writers at DN.

by Eric J. Thompson on Sep 23, 2009 9:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

History

Doesn’t History Tend to repeat its self? I think Willis has his Number.
Of course on that same premise you all did beat us last time.

by Ten-Man on Sep 23, 2009 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't...

… exactly call one game a “history.”

by sfgfan on Sep 23, 2009 3:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

It happened in the past didn’t it?

Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.

by howtheyscored on Sep 23, 2009 4:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

I figured it was okay because you’re one of the ones who knows not to take me seriously.

Context, people. More context is good. Less context is bad. If you're willing to be reductive, then you're willing to be wrong.

by howtheyscored on Sep 24, 2009 8:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

Oh

I knew you were being sarcastic. I was just hoping your comment didn’t fan the fire for the other side!

by sfgfan on Sep 24, 2009 9:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

Viking offense

From what I’ve been reading, it sounds like Favre hasn’t really made very many big plays for the Vikings (though it’s only been two weeks). I’m wondering if this is by design, or if it’s Favre just settling for the check down option more often than he has in the past.

Are the Vikings coaches trying to make the Vikings offense to be the Peterson/Taylor show?

If not, then is Favre going for the checkdown because his reads are coming along slower than in the past? Or are the receivers having a hard time getting open deeper?

by sfgfan on Sep 23, 2009 9:51 AM PDT reply actions  

We're not really sure either.

This has been a pressing question over at our site throughout the first two weeks too. There are lots of opinions as to why Favre’s throws have been shorter than Gary Coleman so far, but here are the general prevailing schools of thought:

  1. Favre isn’t comfortable enough with the offense since he thinks he’s better than everyone and doesn’t have to show up for training camp missed most of the preseason, and he’s checking down because he doesn’t have good enough rapport with Rice, Berrian, and Harvin yet.
  2. The offensive line hasn’t given him enough time to look downfield.
  3. Brad Childress is handcuffing the offense with his way-too-conservative playcalling.
  4. The Vikings are using the Sports Guy’s “Milton Berle Theory.” I won’t explain it in detail since you can Google it pretty easily, but basically it means the Vikings are showing just enough to win since we played two weak opponents so far.

I personally think it might be a mix of all four, but I’m hoping that it’s mostly #1 and #4 and not #2 and #3.

by Eric J. Thompson on Sep 23, 2009 10:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

Is Brett's lack of 25+ yard plays concerning for you guys?

Personally I think it’s a good thing for you. It’s when Brett tries to make a muscle move with his arm that he goes crazy and throws interceptions. Right now he’s got a super high pass efficiency because of those short passes.

by smileyman on Sep 23, 2009 9:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

You can't teach an old dog new tricks ...

… and you REALLY can’t teach an aging quarterback who skips most of training camp a new way of playing.

If he hasn’t thrown the ball deep yet, that’s just because he’s only played two games. He’s the same player he’s been for the last couple of years.

by Ronaldinho on Sep 24, 2009 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

One of the criticisms of his career

is that he has thrown so many short passes. He’s always done them well and when he has had a RB to ride, he’s gone with it. The dramatic long passes that are big successes or failures make the highlight reels, sting more and/or are more memorable.

It’s funny you call him an old dog. Chilly referred to him calling audibles as a dog with a shock collar who just ignores it.

by Salty on Sep 24, 2009 6:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

There is a definite concern for me

Viking fan here.
Normally, I’d agree with the sentiment that the deep ball will come eventually. But what really concerns me is that up until that point DBs are going to start jumping those short bubble screens and housing the picks with regular consistancy. If I’m N. Clements and I see Harvin across from me spin sideways at the snap of the ball, you’d better believe I’m booking it straight forward into the passing lane with visions of endzones dancing in my head.

by Jayrome007 on Sep 24, 2009 10:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

the question of competitive parity comes in to play...

obviously, neither the niners nor the vikes have played any elite team (and no, I don’t consider AZ an elite team). that said, how well has Favre synched with his o-line and playbook, and how much do you think a strong defense will disrupt the flow he’s seemed to have found?

i was wrong to do that stuff

by jaylikewise on Sep 23, 2009 9:51 AM PDT reply actions  

The offensive line has been an issue. There’s been a debate among Vikings fans recently about whether Favre should be throwing downfield more often — and while there are valid points to be made on both sides of that argument, it’s not terribly feasible for the Vikings to open up the passing game if Favre’s protection doesn’t improve. As far as his grasp of the playbook, it’s hard to say simply because he’s been asked to do so little thus far. There were a few miscues between him and his receivers in week one, but nothing that struck me as a big deal. As for your second question, this offense still lives and dies by the running game and the path to beating the Vikings still lies in stopping Adrian Peterson. That said, even if Peterson is kept under control, Favre still has plenty of weapons at his disposal. The real question is if Favre can single-handedly win games for this team if the running game fails to do so — but so far, Peterson has been putting plenty of points on the board.

by Anthony21 on Sep 23, 2009 10:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

thanks

…and i think that’s a great answer. Favre can maybe will the team to a win, but so far has been able to let the Vikings strengths shine. He was hit or miss with the Jets in that field general role, but there was no significant run threat. Bottom line: no one’s been able to stop AP, and that is clearly the key to beating the Vikings.

i was wrong to do that stuff

by jaylikewise on Sep 23, 2009 11:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

I've got five

How much confidence do you and most Vikings fans have in your secondary?

Prior to this year, who would most Vikings fans consider your biggest rival: Bears or Packers? And where do the Niners sit on the rival list for having a 4-1 career playoff record vs Minnesota?

What is your assessment of Childress thus far as both a HC and play caller?

How quickly might fans turn on Favre if/when his play begins to look like NYJ December ’08?

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 23, 2009 10:33 AM PDT reply actions  

Looks like you need answers...

Granted, I’m just a Vikings fan and regular Daily Norseman reader and poster, but here are my thoughts:

1) I, for one, have more confidence in our secondary than I have in a LONG time. Yes, we let Sharper walk, but as the length of his unemployment showed, there were not too many people sold on him anymore, although he’s looked pretty good as a Saint so far… Madieu Williams is a really under-the -radar safety, and second year Tyrell Johnson was the second safety drafted last year and is looking solid. Cedric Griffin is improving as a cover corner, and Antoine Winfield is an elite CB. Our nickel back and dime back are Benny Sapp and rookie Asher Allen who are both smash mouth ballers. Sapp is an emotional player, but seems to have channeled that this year. Obviously, this is all helped by the insane pass rush that the Vikings are able to get with 3/4 of the D-Line starting the last Pro-Bowl…

2) The Packers are our biggest rival, but this year the Bears have become just annoying. The Bears and Vikings have not been relevant at the same time in a long time, and Minneapolis/St Paul’s proximity to Wisconsin makes the border battle all the more heated. As far as our rivalry with San Fran, it’s faded… I’m 31, so the 49’ers golden years were while I was first getting interested in football. Those years have been gone for a while, so it’s hard to guage a rivalry with a team that we don’t see very often, and the last few games we’ve had haven’t been that big… That said, I like the Niners…

3) Childress is an ok coach. Would I like to see a more exciting head coach like a Shanahan, Gruden, Billick or Cowher? Kind of… Can I argue improving by 2 wins a year? Nope. Right now, the Vikings seem to have really good personnel men; we’ve done a really good job in the draft and through trades and free agency to fill all of our holes and have quality depth at most positions. I’m giving Childress the benefit of the doubt right now. We’ll see what the play calling looks like when we hit a little adversity…

4) I don’t see a swoon like we saw last year, and here’s why: Favre is healthy right now, he’s admitted to not being too proud to sit if necessary, he’s broken the Iron Man Record, he has “quality” backup at his position, and possibly most important, he should only have one really cold game the whole year (Dec 28, Chi) I think the Dome keeps Favre from swooning….

by ctowner35 on Sep 23, 2009 11:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

Appreciate the reply

Certainly hope we beat you. I’m interested to see how your secondary plays us and the next few games. I see Hill as needing to make a few down field plays to win this game; that’s how I’d callit if I were Raye and I believe the opportunites can be had. Going forward I do eagerly anticipate the GB-MIN MNF game. I would also add that the game in GB is likely to be cold weather.

I do get why GB is your main rival but it’s funny that they’re also Chicago’s. That makes GB the center of the old Central Division’s universe which is slightly odd due to their being the smaller market. But they do have more SBs so that may also be why.

Good luck after Sunday.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 23, 2009 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's not so much SBs

its being the king of the hill. The Packers have won the division or been competitive for quite a while.

by Salty on Sep 23, 2009 3:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Packers / Bears goes back to the beginning of the league.

They were both natural rivals and also both competitive for a long time, going back to the Halas/Lambeau days. They are still 1 and 2 all time in NFL championships. The history behind that rivalry is probably bigger than anything this side of Yankees / Red Sox.

That rivalry will always be there, independently of how either team is performing.

by Migrant lurker on Sep 24, 2009 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

Vike's secondary

The Viking’s best DB is still Winfield but he is generously listed at 5-9. I’m not all that familiar with your current recieving core but if guys have anybody 6-4 or over thats where I start to worry as a Vikings fan. Griffin can hold his own for awhile but keep targeting him and eventually he tends to get burned. As a whole though, the CB dou is tremendous at tackling and beating the block. So if Gore wants to run the sweep/toss you’d better have some dependable blocking WRs.

by Jayrome007 on Sep 24, 2009 10:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Blocking WRs

Morgan is an absolute yes. He’ll block corners and safeties, near the line and up the field. Bruce is older and is good at getting in the way but not on Morgan’s level. Battle is another WR very willing to block and get physical. If your corners are hyper willing to blow up the run, I wonder if Raye will call a halfback pass this game?

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 25, 2009 12:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

Excellent take

Ya, I’ve never even thought about that, nor can I remember the last time it was ran against us. But with the way our corners play, I could definitely see it working.

by Jayrome007 on Sep 25, 2009 10:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'll see what I can do

1) Tremendous. Tyrell Johnson is the only question mark. Winfield and Griffin are a solid CB tandem, and Madieu WIlliams is very good. Darren Sharper was a quality Pro Bowl guy, but the Vikings let him go, and Johnson has to step up.

2) Green Bay. SF is down on the list, to be honest. There was something there in the 1980’s, because we seemed to always meet in the playoffs. And with the exeception of 1987, you got the better of us. But that was a long time ago, and memories fade…except the memory of Anthony Carter running wild and Joe Montana getting benched, lol.

3) Average, and below average. He was the ‘name’ guy when the Vikes fired Tice, and I liked the hiring. He immediately traded Daunte Culpepper (Culpepper was just as culpable in that mess), drafted an unknown QB to be ‘his guy’, and promptly took a 9-7 team and went 6-10. He is a reputed QB guru who loves to run the ball, even on third and 13. His play calling has been very predictable, and very frustrating for Viking fans. I will give him credit for very solid drafting/free agent signings, and his teams have improved in each season. He’s had some locker room issues, but he’s managed to quell those and keep the team with him.

4) Good question, because I don’t know. Most fans like the signing, and will give Favre more leeway than they would Tarvaris Jackson or Sage Rosenfels. This is a make or break season for Childress, though, so I think he would have to make a move. If the Vikes don’t go to the playoffs and at least win a game, his job could be in jeopardy.

So I write a blog, like everyone else on the Internet: www.purplebuckeye.blogspot.com

by Ted Glover on Sep 24, 2009 11:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thx for the answers

I didn’t think we’d be high on the rivalry list but losing to one team in the playoffs three times in a ten year span usually leaves a residue. I think you’d find most Niners fan didn’t think much about Green Bay prior to 1995, yet now have hate for the Pack due to a 1-4 playoff record vs them since that time. As a fan who recalls the rivalry with the Giants from the ’80s, I always find pulling for them to be foreign even though we won more than we lost vs them. The stakes were just always so high whenever we played, reg and post-season.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 25, 2009 12:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

Vikings Defense

Could you provide more insight into the Vikings defense? The Vikings are not a familiar opponent so it seems my knowledge about them is pretty general; good unit, Williams Wall, Jared Allen and Winfield is a good CB. However I could barely name who the rest of the guys are on the defense and what are their strengths and weaknesses.

by bignerd on Sep 23, 2009 11:23 AM PDT reply actions  

Be afraid...

The Vikings have the makings of a top defense:

DE:Jared Allen - ’nuff said.
DT:Keven Williams -
see Allen, Jared
DT:Pat Williams - still big and quick. Quality depth at the DT position
DE: Ray Edwards -
young, improving. Also see Brian Robison, quick, athletic situational pass rusher

WLB: Chad Greenway - just voted Defensive Palyer of the Week young, budding All-Star
MLB: EJ Henderson -
would have been an All star last year if he didn’t go down for the season in week 5, 100% back
SLB: Ben Leber — Underrated starting caliber LB, Leber brings his lunch pail and plays solid technical football

CB: Antoine Winfield - This guy is just plain good
CB: Cedric Griffin -
Still learning, but improving. Just got a nice contract extension. Solid starter, good against the run

SS: Madieu Williams - Missed half of last year with a neck injury, 100% back and busting skulls
FS: Tyrell Johnson -
Solid second year player, hits hard, improving

A case could and probably will be made for up to 7 starters on the Defense to make the Pro Bowl

by ctowner35 on Sep 23, 2009 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Vikings fans are really up on Antoine Winfield

And I’ve always liked him as a player as well, but hasn’t the truth been that while he is a PHENOMENAL tackling corner and probably the best run-support corner in the NFL, in the last two years, the Vikings pass D has been mediocre (18th in the NFL in 2008) and terrible (dead last in 2007). And, a case probably will be made for 7 starters to go to the Pro Bowl? That’s homerism at best. Williams, Williams, and Allen definitely, Greenway probably, but other than that, you’re really reaching.

by the guy on Sep 23, 2009 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

Here it is...

A few mis-conceptions about stats…

Here’s my 7: The 4 that were voted in last year PLUS:
EJ Henderson, in the conversation last year before the injury
Greenway, only his second year really…
Madieu Williams is number 7 and I have been very impressed so far

I wasn’t saying that 7 will make it, but a case could be made for each of these players… I’m guessing 4-5 will make it on Defense and as many as 4-5 on offense too (AP, Hutch, are locks, McKinnie, Favre, Shiancoe and Percy/Berrian could get looks, and I’ll give you a little homerism there)

As far as pass D is concerned, in ’07 and ’08, Minnesota was thrown on more than any other team because of the insane rush D. If you look at ’07, our YPA was average ranked, and improved in ’08 and the points scored was still pretty strong.

Conversely, Detroit had a fairly well ranked pass D because nobody had to throw on them…

by ctowner35 on Sep 23, 2009 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Why Purple?

Not to be rude but purple!!!! I’ve never heard of a purple viking so it strikes me as odd. Has there been any discussion around Minnesota about the Vikings possibly moving to LA? Does people in MN get a sense that Favre is not 100% still and is being very careful with the number of balls he is throwing.

Game one: 21
Game two: 27

Joe and Steve were under the same system for years... don't expect Smith to be super so soon.

by bayboy on Sep 23, 2009 11:28 AM PDT reply actions  

Not fair.

Yeah purple isn’t exactly chic these days, I’ll give you that. But purple and gold are symbolism for royalty, which perhaps one day the Vikings will actually be in the NFL. By the way, the “new throwback” jerseys that the Niners are wearing this year are awesome. Couldn’t be happier with them.

As for the LA thing, yes there has been talk about it, but most Minnesota fans are taking the “maybe if we ignore it, it will go away” approach. At least I have. Bottom line: the Vikings need to replace the Metrodome within the next few years or we’re in huge, huge trouble.

Regarding Favre, take a look at the answer I gave to sfgfan earlier on. We’re not really sure what’s going on either.

by Eric J. Thompson on Sep 23, 2009 1:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Vikings Move

Good thing the NFL has Jacksonville and St. Louis, right?

by bignerd on Sep 23, 2009 1:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Abso-frickin'-lutely.

I feel bad for doing it, but I’m enjoying each blackout in Jacksonville and St. Louis. Don’t think for a second that going after Favre wasn’t mostly about the money for Vikings owner Zygi Wilf. The Jersey and ticket sales alone are going to bring in a lot more revenue.

by Eric J. Thompson on Sep 23, 2009 1:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Would love the Rams back in LA

A short travel for Niner fans as there were always a bunch in the stands. It would also be nice to have all West teams in the Pacific time zone. We shouldn’t have road division games at 10AM pacific.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 23, 2009 1:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

California fandom

I’ve got a question for all you Californians.
Being from Minnesota, I’ve never even had a choice when it comes to my sports alligiances. Its been Twins, Vikings, Gophers, TWolves, Wild/NorthStars no ifs ands or buts. Each of those teams have sole domination of this region in their given sport.
But in Cali, where multiple teams play, how does one deside their alligiance? I suppose its obvious if you are from the city of San Fran or Oakland or LA. But what about the in-betweeners? Who do you cheer for or do you cheer for anyone at all?

by Jayrome007 on Sep 24, 2009 10:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

mostly location

oakland is more north than san francisco so people more northern tend to like the raiders. People more south like the 49ers. Then there is LA and San Diego. But there is a mix because a lot of people move around in California.

Go 49ers

by iaalexeeff on Sep 24, 2009 10:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

Some is location, some is birth era, some is parents

I grew up in Oakland as a 49er fan; was fortunately raised that way. The raiders moving to LA and the Niners dominating the decade and 18 years total caused most Northern CA kids to be raised as 49er fans. The winning ways of the Niners combined with the elegant way they transformed offensive football made it easy to love watching them. The disloyalty of Al Davis made it easy for many to hate the raiders. The Chargers never seemed to matter one way or the other outside of southern CA.

Not sure if you’ve been to CA but if not, it’s a huge state. Many outsiders don’t always grasp just how far the distance is from SF to LA. Different media markets and traditionally different cultural attitudes. I would say that baseball fandom is more complicated but the NL teams (Dodgers and Giants) have larger fan bases than their AL counterparts. I would guess that tradition and stronger radio broadcast signals helped create that fan base.

Lastly, we’ve got tons of transplants (NY and NE states in the Bay Area) so there are plenty of people who claim their birth team.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 25, 2009 12:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

Well

I had liked both teams growing up, and never really choose one over the other. It was actually the Raiders moving to L.A. in 1982 when I was a Kid that made me solely a 49er fan. I felt betrayed by that move, heck I had some Oakland Raiders football cards, and one of my favorites cards at the time was Jim Plunkett card! He was on the Niners before getting picked up by Oakland. Anyways, I guess it was sort of a link for me between the two teams that ended when they went to L.A. Heck I remember Crossing Oakland out and writing L.A. on every raider card I had.

by Ten-Man on Sep 25, 2009 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions  

Vikings vs Jags vs Rams relocation

When it comes down to it, there is no way that Jacksonville deserves a NFL team more than does St. Louis and Minnesota. But that being said, I can’t believe LA still doesn’t have a team and it will only be a matter of time before they get somebody, regardless of what the NFL and the commish are saying.

by Jayrome007 on Sep 24, 2009 10:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'll give you the royalty significance...

but until they become elite, I’ll continue to question the color. Even though it would be hard to part with the idea of a Viking in the NFL, I can’t see ur owner shelling out close to 1 billion dollars to construct a new stadium… and lastly do you feel comfortable with Jackson coming in this sunday and finish the game… Favre may not make it.. (see Hasselbeck)

Joe and Steve were under the same system for years... don't expect Smith to be super so soon.

by bayboy on Sep 24, 2009 10:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

question away!

Purple is my favorite color and I am secure enough in my manhood to know that’s an ok thing.

Honestly, the stadium situation is looking pretty bleek. Not enough private funding can be collected, and the state government/voters just don’t seem to interested whatsoever is helping the Vikes out with any public funding. There is a great plan drawn up to build a new retractable roof stadium and large business district on and around the land currently holding the Metrodome, but these projects cost a lot of money, and like I said before, the state is not interested in helping.

I hold out hope that something gets figured out in the next two years (The Vikings lease at the Metrodome is up in 2011 and they are not making any money in the outdated dome to merit another deal) but my natural pessimistic ways have set in.

If you can't laugh at yourself... Who can you laugh at?
The Packers, that’s who.
-- The almighty Manimal

by TheViking83 on Sep 24, 2009 1:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hope Shaun Hill doesn’t get hurt.

by Salty on Sep 24, 2009 6:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

haha

As the years go by you always hear people talking about how Favre may get hurt, yet when a qb gets hurt its always been the opposing team’s qb.

Recent examples would include 2 injuries in preseason games against the vikes Cassel and Schaub.

by dsludo on Sep 25, 2009 8:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Most of us think that ship has sailed with the Vikings. (Pun intended.)

There were a lot of fans that were behind Jackson going into the preseason, based on his strong performance in the last few games of the 2008 regular season. I was not one of them, but he had quite a bit of support even after we brought in Sage Rosen copter fels.

After the old guy showed up, most of us figured that the Vikings would deal Jackson away and keep Rosenfels and John David Booty. Turns out that Booty went to the practice squad and we kept everyone, so I’m not really sure what the front office has in mind for next year. All I know is that I’m not looking forward to the annual “Will He or Won’t He Retire” crap next offseason.

Unless, of course, I have a shiny new Lombardi trophy to look at.

by Eric J. Thompson on Sep 23, 2009 1:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Are you guys really happy to have Favre on the team after so many years playing in Green Bay?

I still believe in Ryan Garko...........

by 49er16 on Sep 23, 2009 1:14 PM PDT reply actions  

Yes.

Next weekend will be epic. He’s a really good fit for our offense right now, and it’s the ultimate form of sticking it to the Packers. Is that feeling sophomoric? Absolutely. It’s like taking out the long time girlfriend of your high school enemy for the summer before you both head off to college. I’m looking at this as a mutual relationship of convenience and opportunity, with no strings attached…

by ctowner35 on Sep 23, 2009 1:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

heh

and the old boyfriend is angry. For some reason after he booted her out the door, she wasn’t supposed to date any more.

by Salty on Sep 23, 2009 3:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

to counter ctowner's response

No.

Not everyone is.

Have we accepted it, and agreed that no matter what we bleed purple and will cheer for the Vikes until we go can’t speak anymore?

Yes.

It’s like taking out the long time girlfriend of your high school enemy for the summer before you both head off to college.

Unless you hated his girlfriend with all of your heart also, I’d say its more like becoming best buds with said enemy.

And it feels a little dirty.

Strong play and playoff victories can certainly be a good soap though.

If you can't laugh at yourself... Who can you laugh at?
The Packers, that’s who.
-- The almighty Manimal

by TheViking83 on Sep 24, 2009 6:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, the problem is...

I was always jealous of his girlfriend… I hated her b/c she was associated with him, but DAMN, she looks good on my arm now!!

by ctowner35 on Sep 26, 2009 10:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

For me, I wouldn't say happy as much as weird.

We’re a month into it, and it’s still _really_weird seeing Favre in purple. I’ve spent so many years and so much energy hating him—I can’t quite just turn that off and blindly root for him yet. Don’t get me wrong, I think he gives us the best chance to win and I think he’s said and done everything right so far. But I’m still getting used to the whole thing.

by Eric J. Thompson on Sep 23, 2009 1:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

Howdy Gonzo and other Viking Fans

I have been over at The Daily Norseman trolling around looking and reading what most of your fans have been saying. There is a lot I agree with, but I get the sense that most of your fan base doesn’t see the 49ers as a quality opponent. Do you sense that also? And do you see us as a quality opponent?

 I see these two teams built on similar platforms with a strong running game and strong defense. I think this will be a close game with the team whose defense is in better condition ending up on top. What is your overall expectations from each team?

by Ten-Man on Sep 23, 2009 1:33 PM PDT reply actions  

I don't see it that way

With the way the Niners have started off, I think it would be foolish to view them as not being a quality opponent. They’re light years ahead of the two teams we’ve already played in terms of talent and coaching, in my opinion (never been terribly high on Mangini, and Jim Schwartz is an unknown quantity in every category except “gratuitous Spaceballs references made”).

Frank Gore is a man-beast, to be sure, and the Niners’ defense is solid. . .look no further than the way you guys contained AP the last time we got together. I’m trying to learn more about your team’s defense as we get closer to game time, since I don’t know a lot about them. Patrick Willis, naturally, scares the crap out of me, and the Vikings tend to have trouble with the 3-4, but I think the Niners are easily the best team we’ve faced thus far.

Do I think the Vikings are going to win? Well, yeah. (-: But I don’t think we’re going to roll the Niners or anything, barring us jumping out to a quick lead and forcing Shaun Hill into mistakes.

The Daily Norseman - The greatest Vikings' site on the Internet!

by Christopher Gates on Sep 23, 2009 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sorry if that rambled a bit

Feeling a bit under the weather this afternoon. Just looked back over it and. . .well, yeah, it kind of rambled.

The points I was trying to make. . .the Niners are the best team we’ve played thus far and, after watching Green Bay’s o-line last week, possibly the best team we’ll face until Baltimore comes rolling into town in Week 6.

Both defenses will obviously be focused on shutting down the other team’s star running back. Whoever does it the best will more than likely win. Neither team’s passing offense is particularly scary, in my opinion.

Patrick Willis = scary mofo

The Daily Norseman - The greatest Vikings' site on the Internet!

by Christopher Gates on Sep 23, 2009 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Matchup of the day

Patrick Willis vs Adrian Peterson Round 2

by Vikant on Sep 24, 2009 11:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

Defense. My two cents

Three weeks ago I think you’d have found a split opinion among NN re our defene as a whole and DBs specifically. Only two games, but I think the majority of us would agree that we have one of the better defensive backfields in the league, both starters and depth. The LBs are solid, led obviously by Willis. Our D-line was good against the run last season and appears so again. You’ll see Franklin make some plays in the backfield and be solid yet unnoticed on most other plays. We want more out of Balmer and Sop even if it’s just batting down passes at the line.

Most all of us were pleasantly surprised with our pass rush in week 1 after the preseason showed zero pass rush. Haralson is legit. Lawson a work in progress but I’m interested to see him on turf. Nothing great behind them though we may get Brooks back this week from injury; his pass rushing ability is a question mark but supposedly has potential. Smith is our Allen; not as great at rushing the QB, probably a bit better defending the run but same all game hustle.

Playing two division opponents meant we were up against known competition but they also knew us. It’ll be interesting to see how the Niners D and Vikings offense attack one another and adjust during the game.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 23, 2009 3:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not all Viking Fans Do

But I see a lot of Viking Fans all over the net saying the 49ers are not a legit team! And that the real test shouldn’t come until week 6 against the Ravens. By no means am I saying all the Viking Fans are that way, but for some reason there seems to be quite a few saying that the game is in the bag already and dismissing any chance the 49ers may have to win this game, even going as far as saying that our defense is not even respectable! They don’t even give the Packers a chance in week 4. So really, are there that many Viking fans with blinders on or do you think it is a Minority who really don’t have a clue about anything outside of Minneapolis/St. Paul, especially football?

by Ten-Man on Sep 24, 2009 1:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Where are you reading this?

by Salty on Sep 24, 2009 6:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't know what Ten-Man means specifically, but ....

I got that same vibe he was talking about while reading the comments section on articles about the game over at
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/09/24/checkpoint-game-for-niners/#comments

I realize that not all the bad comments are from Vikings fans, but they are generally talking down to us

by CLS on Sep 24, 2009 9:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

What a loony bin

I got about half way through and I’m not sure I saw a single Viking fan talking down to a 9r fan. A Raiders fan talking trash and a bunch of Packer fans talking down to Viking fans was most of it.

by Salty on Sep 25, 2009 7:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

I was thinking that was the case

Yeah the comments (and some would say articles) at profootballtalk leave something to be desired. Hard to tell who is a fan of who sometimes ( Though Wonderlic_Myballs is a professed Vikings fan and was talking down about us. Though maybe the screen name should have made me wary =) )

I think we are basically just an easy target. We had a really good run for a long time, so now that we have been hurting people have been sticking it to us.

And if you don’t follow the team regularly, and see our record for the greater part of this decade, I could see where people would write us off without another thought.

by CLS on Sep 25, 2009 9:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

NFL.com

Had some article about APand his back and there were Viking fans talking this way! Oh by the way just to talk a little trash, My new Nickname for him AP is “CROW”
Can’t Run On Willis!

by Ten-Man on Sep 25, 2009 9:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

Any Given Sunday

If there’s two things I’ve learned over the years, it’s that;

1) Talking down at the other team just gives them more incentive fuel to beat us, and;

2) The NFL has far too much parity to ever dismiss ANY team.

For Vikings fans, one of our biggest rivals/worries is playing the Lions. Doesn’t matter that they haven’t won a game in living memory (hehe), they’re still a serious threat and we certainly don’t want to be the team the lets them out the hole they dug for themselves. The 49ers are a much better team than Detroit, we’d be stupid to think that the game was ‘in the bag’.

That being said, we have our share of testosterone-driven fan-replies (and some who don’t even have that excuse), just like everyone else. Most of us at the DN just give those guys a wide berth and try not to let them annoy us. After all, we’re all here to cheer on our teams :)

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Sep 25, 2009 9:20 AM PDT up reply actions  

How much do the niners chances improve if EJ Henderson doesn’t play, since he didn’t practice with a shoulder injury?

by sundaysfinest on Sep 23, 2009 4:21 PM PDT reply actions  

Both injuries are minor

Both are slated to play. Now if you excuse me, I have to go sacrifice a goat at an altar I made to appease the football gods to ensure AP’s health.

by Eric J. Thompson on Sep 24, 2009 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

EJ's a Beast!

Seriously, he’s huge and he flies. Not good for the landing spot.

If he doesn’t play, it won’t help the 49ers very much on the ground; the Williams Wall is stout and it’s pro-active. With Allen providing the extra pressure on Hill, and Greenway and Leber shifting between run coverage and secondary assist, the D is really very solid even without him. We went most of last year without EJ and the run-D was top-notch.

If he does play, he’ll provide a lot of extra pressure on Hill in the middle, making the medium-passing game much riskier.

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Sep 25, 2009 9:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

If you're going to use nicknames:

A.D. vs Bamm Bamm

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

by SportsChicken on Sep 23, 2009 8:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Bamm Bamm VS A.D.

His teammates call him P.Willie not Bamm Bamm, but I have no problem with two nick names he is good enough to support both.

by ResevoirDog49 on Sep 23, 2009 8:38 PM PDT reply actions  

Chand 8 5

Dubbed him Bamm Bamm

I’m pretty sure his teammates just call him Patrick.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

by SportsChicken on Sep 23, 2009 11:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

That came from Ocho Sucko?

by bignerd on Sep 23, 2009 11:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yep

You didn’t know?

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

by SportsChicken on Sep 24, 2009 12:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

No, that is very disappointing.

by bignerd on Sep 24, 2009 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

Why?

"Catchin a ride on the Muthaship" Optimist Prime is just the co-pilot!
"Go Sing GO"
X's and O's? don't need 'em. Perrenial all pro's? just stat guys, not important!
Culture of Winning? Can take you places, especially while hitting people in the mouth!!

by rlott#42 on Sep 24, 2009 8:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

You don’t let an opponent nickname your teammate.

by bignerd on Sep 24, 2009 9:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

He meant it as a compliment

I say the best compliments are the ones you receive from your competition.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

by SportsChicken on Sep 24, 2009 9:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ocho Cinco

"Catchin a ride on the Muthaship" Optimist Prime is just the co-pilot!
"Go Sing GO"
X's and O's? don't need 'em. Perrenial all pro's? just stat guys, not important!
Culture of Winning? Can take you places, especially while hitting people in the mouth!!

by rlott#42 on Sep 24, 2009 8:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Bamm Bamm was a perfectly legit nickname

Until this past week’s episode of “Curb Your Enthusiasm”.

by Eric J. Thompson on Sep 24, 2009 2:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't watch that

So I’ll still call him Bamm Bamm

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

by SportsChicken on Sep 24, 2009 9:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

Patrick Willis will crush this past week's episode of "Curb"

It was Johnny Hopkins, and Sloan Kettering, and they were blazin that s*** up everyday.

by 49erLou on Sep 25, 2009 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

P Will not PWillie

Sounds too fruity, the man has soul and loves to hit people in the mouth!

"Catchin a ride on the Muthaship" Optimist Prime is just the co-pilot!
"Go Sing GO"
X's and O's? don't need 'em. Perrenial all pro's? just stat guys, not important!
Culture of Winning? Can take you places, especially while hitting people in the mouth!!

by rlott#42 on Sep 24, 2009 8:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

where did the name Purple Jesus come from?

Is Harvin better than Berrian?
Has your special teams improved (I heard you guys had a bad special teams)
Is Sage Rosenfels or Travaris Jackson the #2?
Is Shiancoe a threat?

Go 49ers

by iaalexeeff on Sep 23, 2009 9:46 PM PDT reply actions  

Berrian is a better overall receiver right now, but Harvin is better for what the Vike offense is trying to accomplish. When Favre finally did show up in camp and preseason he didn’t get to work with Berrian at all due to a hamstring injury. Berrian did catch 6 passes last week after catching zero in week 1, but for only 48 yards (last season Berrian averaged 20 yards/catch). Until Favre and Childress decide to throw deep, Berrian will likely be less relevant in the passoffense than Harvin, who is ideal for the short passing/wildcat offense we are using right now.

Special teams – hard to say. Overall based on averages it’s done a better job, but they did give up a punt return TD to Josh Cribbs and the Browns in week 1 that put us behind at the time. Heath Farwell’s return from an ACL injury in 08 has been huge (though he may slide into the starting rotation if EJ Henderson can’t go.

Right now Jackson is the #2 QB.

Shiancoe had a 1 yard TD catch but that’s been about it so far. With Favre’s track record of throwing to the TE I’d imagine he will get more targets in the future.

by TEXVIKE on Sep 24, 2009 7:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

It’s hard to say whether Harvin is better than anyone on the Vikings because it’s so difficult to pin Harvin down to one area of expertise. Comparing him to Berrian is an apples and oranges thing, they’re so different and they have different strengths and weaknesses. That’s what makes Harvin so dangerous, even we don’t know where he’s going to pop up from play to play, lol! But wherever he gets a touch, he’s going to make it count. His average is better than 10 yards a touch, whether he’s lining up on the line of scrimmage or coming out of the backfield.

Berrian is the guy we’ve pinned our speed-hopes on to stretch the field deep, but he’s been injury-prone so he hasn’t had as much impact as we wanted. He’s technically very savvy though, and even if the speed isn’t there, expect him to take advantage of the slightest mistake or mis-step from the secondary.

Special Teams are much, much better than the debacle we had last year. Part of the difference is a new ST coach, part of it is the return of our ST Madman, Heath Farwell (who was injured most of last year), and part of it a lot of improvement on the part of our punter, Chris Kluwe. Kluwe has plenty of strength in his leg, but last year he really struggled with accuracy and hang-time. Booming a punt 60 yards isn’t very helpful if it also outpaces the coverage by 20 yards.

As far as we know, T-Jack is #2 and Sage is #3 (and possibly injured right now).

And Shiancoe has grown. Shanko will hopefully not be perceived as a threat so that he can take full advantage of flying under the radar :) . He’s a big man and has great hands, he and Favre have developed some chemistry and he has a knack for being in the right place at the right time. More than that, he’s good at providing secondary blocking for the running game.

I have no idea who started the ‘Purple Jesus’ moniker, but AP has definitely been the savior of the Vikings offense, time and time again. Did you see the video of that 64 yard run against the Browns? True, it was the Browns… but man, it was EPIC, and that ain’t homerism :)
LINK

Ah, ah,
We come from the land of the ice and snow,
From the midnight sun where the hot springs blow.
The hammer of the gods will drive our ships to new lands,
To fight the horde, singing and crying: Valhalla, I am coming!
SKOL!

by DCPurple on Sep 25, 2009 9:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

where did the name Purple Jesus come from?

See 224 and 296 rushing yard performances as a rookie, definitely their savior.
And don’t forget Minnesota Moses!

by darcwingdux on Sep 24, 2009 2:46 AM PDT reply actions  

yeah

I’m not exactly sure of the origin, but it definitely came about after the 296 yard performance against San Diego.

If you can't laugh at yourself... Who can you laugh at?
The Packers, that’s who.
-- The almighty Manimal

by TheViking83 on Sep 24, 2009 6:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

Purple Jesus

Originally a cheap and nasty wino drink made with vodka & grape juice (or some similar combination).

Then AP came along and helped save a struggling franchise that happens to wear purple…

by dkerfoot on Sep 24, 2009 10:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

Who's Minnesota Moses?

Steve Hutchinson—since he causes defenses to part?
Seriously, I wish the Niners had him at offensive guard.

Morgan breaks through in 2009!

by grantmp on Sep 24, 2009 8:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

Does anyone at the Daily Norsemen

or Viking fans in general still remember Shaun Hill?

Was he ever that guy in practice who got some fans but obviously he never played in a game (and knowing his practice rep, I’d be surprised that he found any following).

Additionally, after watching niner rejects, for years, go on to greater and better things with other teams, I can finally ask, what’s it like watching Hill achieve some modicum of success with our club?

by foosball4949 on Sep 24, 2009 8:23 AM PDT reply actions  

I definitely remember him

but never really expected much from him. He was an undrafted FA who made the team and was the third guy for a while, so obviously somebody saw enough in him to keep him around for a few years. I don’t believe he ever really gained any “believers” while he was in Minnesota, and I personally, am very happy to see him doing well in San Fran. I don’t think he’s done enough to give Vikings fans that, “aww shoot, look what we missed” feeling, but he HAS done enough to make me very happy for him.

If you can't laugh at yourself... Who can you laugh at?
The Packers, that’s who.
-- The almighty Manimal

by TheViking83 on Sep 24, 2009 9:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

For the Most part

Most Niner fans are not in love or thrilled with him either! And I doubt he will ever give the Viking fans that "aww shoot, look what we missed" feeling! I think I am still one of the few that would rather have Alex in there as the starting QB. But the good thing about Hill is that I don’t think he is the type that will lose the game for you, but on retrospect, I don’t see him as ever being the guy who picks everyone one up when there down and wins the game on his QB skills either. Just a Solid Game manager often compared to just having to do what Trent Dilfer did with the Ravens.

by Ten-Man on Sep 24, 2009 10:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

I recall reading

That Hill was going to be in the competition for starting QB for Mike Tice, but Tice got fired and the new regime had zero connection to him. Don’t have a link but I read that locally (SF) perhaps last year or the season before (when he first began playing for us).

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 24, 2009 11:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

Moving to LA???

If the Vikings do move to LA that would cause crazy changes in the NFL rearranging some teams… so with that in mind who would you consider the vikings most hated rival? We have the rams and of course the Cowgirls, raiders/chiefs, chicago/packers, redskins/cowboys.. this rivalry takes it back to the wild west… but i never considered the vikings to have a rival…

Joe and Steve were under the same system for years... don't expect Smith to be super so soon.

by bayboy on Sep 24, 2009 10:25 AM PDT reply actions  

Talking to Vike Fans

That’s easy, thay seem to Hate the Packers with a Passion! But I think one of these Viking posters already mentioned it above somewhere!

by Ten-Man on Sep 24, 2009 10:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

yes

The Vikings-Packers rivalry is full of anger and hate…. and we love it!! They are most certainly our biggest rival, and another reason why the whole “Favre to Minnesota” story hijacked so many emotions in the Wisconsin/Minnesota area.

The Vikings-Bears rivalry is pretty good too (especially to a guy like me who is a diehard Vikes fan living in Illinois) but it is not on the same level as Bears/Packers or Vikings/Packers. One thing Vikes and Bears fans can always agree on is our total loathing of all things Green Bay!

If you can't laugh at yourself... Who can you laugh at?
The Packers, that’s who.
-- The almighty Manimal

by TheViking83 on Sep 24, 2009 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

The Lakers aren't named that because LA is known for its freshwater beaches...

I think Zigi Wilf truly wants to kept the Vikings in MN. I really hope we don’t force them to move.

The Packers are definitely the Vikings primary hated rival. As discussed earlier, Mpls/St. Paul is right on the Wisconsin border. Many cheeseheads work in the Twin Cities. Because the Packers have had the better record the last 10 years or so, the number of Packers fans in the border region has increased. This has also increased the animosity.

The Bears are a significant rival, but without the animosity. The Lions are universally loved because they give everyone else in the division 2 extra W’s.

by dkerfoot on Sep 24, 2009 10:39 AM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

2 Extra Wins

Oh my god that is funny, true but funny!

didn’t want to double post this but It ended up in the wrong spot last time… opps

by Ten-Man on Sep 24, 2009 10:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

Packers hands down.

But the Bears aren’t too far behind. Actually, when it comes to our respected SB Nation sites, the Bears fans are much more of our rivals. They have some of the best trollers on the internet. No, that was not a compliment.

by Eric J. Thompson on Sep 24, 2009 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

were all too familiar with Bears fans

amirite drummer :)

It was Johnny Hopkins, and Sloan Kettering, and they were blazin that s*** up everyday.

by 49erLou on Sep 24, 2009 8:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

2 Extra Wins

Oh my god that is funny, true but funny!

by Ten-Man on Sep 24, 2009 10:49 AM PDT reply actions  

Besides the big storylines, what’s the most important cog in the Vikings team? That is to say, what determines the Vikings success besides the guys everyone knows (Farve, AP, the Williamses, etc.)? What should someone who doesn’t watch the Vikings often keep an eye on in this game?

"Snow woulda had it!!!"
Has decided to put all his "In this thing" energy to being in the Shark Tank and the Big House.

by beat_la_25 on Sep 24, 2009 12:55 PM PDT reply actions  

Honestly?

Our special teams. Last year our kick and punt coverage was god awful. I’m talking 5-day-old Indian food in a heatwave awful. We gave up 7 TD returns last year. That is epicly bad. This year we seem to be MUCH better on that front. In fact there was a recent article about how our punter/WoW player/Guitar Hero phenom has been getting more lift on his punts as opposed to length. Granted we gave up one to Josh Cribbs of the Browns, but that is what Josh Cribbs of the Browns does. For some reason, everytime we kick off or punt I cringe and wait for the on comming traffic accident.

by Jepp The Viking on Sep 24, 2009 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

7?! Wow that is bad

Our guy Rossum had one called back last week due to penalty. He’s old but smart. If this is a tight game that small bit of field position shift and/or score could be the difference.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 25, 2009 12:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

TE Visanthe Shiancoe

He really emerged last year as a good, reliable receiver after battling the dropsies when he first signed. He’s a quality third down ‘move the chains’ guy, and last year was a favorite of Frerotte and Jackson in the red zone.

He’s gotten off to a slow start this year, but as the Vikes start to air it out more, look for Shiancoe to make some plays. If you don’t account for him, he’ll kill you.

So I write a blog, like everyone else on the Internet: www.purplebuckeye.blogspot.com

by Ted Glover on Sep 24, 2009 10:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

AP's Fumbles

Another crucial bit is whether Adrian keeps the ball. As amazing as he is, he has had a tendency to fumble.

The big bright point is that we have many options for Favre to throw to. AP’s becoming a better receiver, Chester Taylor (RB #2) has always been good, Shiancoe (TE) has great hands, we just added Harvin, look for Berrian to start hooking up deep (last year averaged 20 yds/catch) and Rice is very dangerous in the end zone. Last game Favre even threw to Kleinsasser who used to catch a lot of passes but has been primarily a blocking tight end the last couple years.

Stacking the box to stop Peterson could be a very dangerous strategy. But of course, not doing so doesn’t seem to work out so well either…

by dkerfoot on Sep 25, 2009 6:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

When will the Vikes unleash Ragnar, Thor, and Loki?

Those are the Vikes I really fear. Especially Loki – he’s a tricky SOB.

Or did the team cut those guys?

by MontanaPass on Sep 24, 2009 1:00 PM PDT reply actions  

Now

Just now. Did you feel it?

by Jepp The Viking on Sep 24, 2009 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Defensive Line

We are never sure where Loki is – he seems to be most interested in messing with Norskies (us) especially around Playoff time. But on Sunday, we’ll be happy to introduce you to the Four Norsemen of the Apocalypse: Jared, Pat, Kevin and Ray

by dkerfoot on Sep 25, 2009 5:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

McKinnie's Holdout

As a Vikings fan what are your thoughts on the Crabtree holdout? Obviously you guys went through a situation a few years ago with McKinnie. During that holdout were Vikings fans kept in the dark on how negotiations were going? Being that he signed about a week before the deadline, were you convinced he wasn’t going to sign or did you expect to get him signed all along?

Tom will never be as cool as Joe

by wader251 on Sep 24, 2009 2:37 PM PDT reply actions  

I, personally

Thought that McKinnie would get signed all along.

In both cases. . .and in any case, quite frankly. . .there’s absolutely, positively no benefit to missing a year and re-entering the draft. In Crabtree’s case, if there was anybody out there that didn’t think he was a diva before this whole episode, they certainly think he is now.

Second of all, Crabtree went #10 in this year’s draft, and was pissed because he wasn’t the first receiver taken. Well, guess what? If he re-enters the draft again in 2010, he won’t be the first WR taken then, either, and he sure as heck won’t be the #10 overall pick. He’s poison at this point.

The Daily Norseman - The greatest Vikings' site on the Internet!

by Christopher Gates on Sep 24, 2009 3:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree completely with that sentiment about Crabtree

Why would you hold out for more money, when the ultimate threat behind your holdout is going to guarantee that you get a worse deal than what is being offered?

by the guy on Sep 24, 2009 4:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

He will come to his senses.

Maybe.
If he stops listening to his cousin and Deion Sanders.

by mountaindew77 on Sep 24, 2009 5:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Broken down percentage wise, it was

65-34-1 before he signed. 65% were okay with it, 34 percent didn’t like it, and then there’s the one percent ‘The Apocalypse is Here and I’ll Never Cheer for the Vikings While He Wears the Uniform’ crowd. Then he signed, and very Lutheran, very uptight Minnesota wigged the hell out. And if he keeps going 24-27 with 2 TD’s and no picks every week, the percentage breakdown will be 98-1-1. You can’t please everyone, lol.

The Packers are the Vikings biggest rival, Favre was their best player, and it’s weird seeing him in a Vikes uniform, no doubt. But if you strip away the emotion, it’s a good move. He is an improvement over Tarvaris Jackson and Sage Rosenfels, and the fact of the matter is had Favre NOT played for Green Bay for all those years Vike fans would have demanded that the Vikings go get him. The Vikings are a different team with Favre, and for the better. They have a confidence and swagger about them they didn’t have, and it’s nice to see. I hope it continues.

So I write a blog, like everyone else on the Internet: www.purplebuckeye.blogspot.com

by Ted Glover on Sep 24, 2009 10:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

right
Then he signed, and very Lutheran, very uptight Minnesota wigged the hell out.

I do seem to recall hearing something about a purple goat. :)

by sleepyotter on Sep 25, 2009 8:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

The uptight Lutheran comment was hilarious and true

I don’t think outsiders realize how incredibly cautious, conservative (but not necessarily politically), and pesimistic Minnesotans can be. Combine that with years and years of Viking letdowns and I think it puts some of our fans’ comments into perspective. It would help clarify some things if other bloggers could see certain remarks through that glass-half-empty perspective.

by Jayrome007 on Sep 25, 2009 10:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

Good point

Context is always good. The culture of the area mixed with the historical culture of the franchise creates the perspective of most (local) fans.

Here in Ninerland, some fans never new losing until 1999. Others spend all their time comparing every coach/player to Walsh and Montana, as though anyone can live up to those men (or as though you can only win a SB with men of that caliber). Reminds me of Steeler fans in the early 90s; everything came back to the Steel Curtain, Bradshaw and crew. It wasn’t until Cower and a new wave of players established themselves that people could separate from while still appreciating the past. I think many of us in the greater NN are at that point. I hope Sing can have a similarly successful run as Cower to turn us around (while keeping ur SB record undefeated).

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 25, 2009 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Viking fans do that to an extent as well

But the point of reference for the over 40 crowd will always start with the Tarkenton, Foreman, and the Purple People Eaters. For the younger generation, it’s probably Moss and the ’98 team.

There’s two distinct histories of the Vikings, the one of the PPE at Met Stadium and then the mostly ‘chuck and duck’ Metrodome era. Hard to believe for me, but the Vikings have played at home indoors longer than they have played outdoors.

And there’s been ‘Are you kidding me’ gutshot losses for both eras, thanks for asking. That seems to be one constant we can’t shake.

So I write a blog, like everyone else on the Internet: www.purplebuckeye.blogspot.com

by Ted Glover on Sep 26, 2009 6:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

wow

AP-bad back
EJ Henderson-bad shoulder
Madieu Williams-bad shoulder
and now Harvin

by sundaysfinest on Sep 24, 2009 8:52 PM PDT reply actions  

thanks for coming over here and posting this

I appreciate all your responses. I see this game as a pretty even match, but you guys are at home, and our O-line had a real problem with crowd noise in Arizona. However they might do better against your large D-line than they did against Arizona’s quick D-line, which seemed to keep getting the jump on them.
Two questions:
How has Minnesota’s run defense done against big beefy Offensive Lines?
What can you tell us about Drew Radovich, the guard we signed to our practice squad after the final cutdowns three weeks ago? He was on the Vikes practice squad for a year and on the Vikes injured reserve for a year.

They're called RUNS for a reason.

by connie mack on Sep 25, 2009 1:20 AM PDT reply actions  

The Vikings had the best run defense in the NFL the last three years. Oddly enough, the Lions ran well against us last week – we are obviously hoping that was a fluke.

It is hard to get much beefier than the Williams Wall (Kevin and Pat – no relation). They are listed as 310 and 315 lbs (Pat is certainly heavier) but they are surprisingly quick. The previous three years, teams have all been pretty quick to give up even trying to run up the middle. On the outside, Jared Allen is an absolute monster who never quits and Ray Edwards is quite capable and benefits from being the guy most likely to be single-teamed.

by dkerfoot on Sep 25, 2009 5:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

to be completely honest...

not a whole lot.

I really liked his potential coming out of USC and when we singed him as an undrafted FA, I thought we might have found a diamond in the rough. From my understanding he had a pretty good camp in ‘08, and my thoughts of him didn’t falter, but this past offseason/training camp/preseason he was very underwhelming and eventually lost his job in a numbers game.

I still think there’s a chance that in a few years he could be productive, but I’m starting to think that it’s much more likely that he never really amounts to anything.

If you can't laugh at yourself... Who can you laugh at?
The Packers, that’s who.
-- The almighty Manimal

by TheViking83 on Sep 25, 2009 7:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

also...

I should say that he was put on IR last year (around the beginning to middle of the season I believe). Perhaps his recovery from injury caused his slower preseason play this season and he can get back on the horse if fully healthy.

If you can't laugh at yourself... Who can you laugh at?
The Packers, that’s who.
-- The almighty Manimal

by TheViking83 on Sep 25, 2009 7:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

thanks for the info

They're called RUNS for a reason.

by connie mack on Sep 25, 2009 7:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Helmet Logo

How long were you a fan before you realized the thing on the side was a 2-D horn and not a comet? Did someone tell you, or did you figure it out yourself? Seems like something Viking dads should impart to their sons.

I’ve been a diehard football fan for over 20 years, and I only figured that out a few years ago. Admittedly, I never gave it much critical thought.

by hammystyle on Sep 25, 2009 12:21 PM PDT reply actions  

Well, my first instinct is to insult you for not knowing they are horns (and admitting it in public) but I guess I can see how it would be confusing without some context. When you see this guy plastered all over, it makes the connection pretty obvious.

http://www.eteamz.com/NorthVikings/images/VikingsHeadShadow.JPG

by dkerfoot on Sep 25, 2009 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, wow...

Really hard not to insult you there… I’d say that there are several more esotaric pieces of professional sports than the viking helmets… I mean, a viking helmet has horns… That’s just how it works…

by ctowner35 on Sep 26, 2009 10:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

A comet? Seriously?

My pessimism goes to the point of suspecting the sincerity of the pessimists.

by shlecko on Sep 25, 2009 6:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

SERIOUSLY

For a while I didn’t think it was a comet.

It looks more like a pair of se(a)men to me……
Sorry for the vulgarity, but that’s what they look like.

If they want them to look like horns, they should make them less white and more 3-Dish.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

by SportsChicken on Sep 26, 2009 12:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

Special teams?

How has the Vikings special teams been so far? Curious

by Drew Kerr on Sep 25, 2009 5:38 PM PDT reply actions  

VERY improved

and we have Heath Farwell to thank for that.

Farwell is probably not very known outside of Minnesota circles, but he literally seems to make EVERY SINGLE special teams tackle.

And he was hurt all of last season.

The Cribbs punt return in week 1 maybe gave some people the impression that we haven’t improved, but if you watch the first two games, that is the only return, kick or punt, that amounted to anything at all. It was a poor kick by Warcraft Kluwe and just an amazing return by Cribbs (Dude’s scary.)

If you can't laugh at yourself... Who can you laugh at?
The Packers, that’s who.
-- The almighty Manimal

by TheViking83 on Sep 25, 2009 8:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

accidentally posted this on the other thread

what do you guys think about your current uniforms? No offense, but personally I don’t like them. I’m not a big fan of the different colored panels on the uniforms, and I wish most teams would just go back to their throwbacks or some sort of varation. I couldn’t be happier with what the Niners decided to go with. Simple design that is reminiscent of the glory days. I would love to see you guys back in this

It was Johnny Hopkins, and Sloan Kettering, and they were blazin that s*** up everyday.

by 49erLou on Sep 25, 2009 9:18 PM PDT reply actions  

I liked the new uniforms because they had purple road pants

which I think are cool looking. But the team developed a superstition about them, because they play like ass when they wear the purple pants. So they quit wearing them.

Go back to the old uniforms.

So I write a blog, like everyone else on the Internet: www.purplebuckeye.blogspot.com

by Ted Glover on Sep 26, 2009 6:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

Most teams could use the old uniforms

These new pajama style things (Vikings and Falcons come to mind) don’t do it. Teams that have kept it more or less the same (Bears, Packers, Raiders, Chiefs, Colts and finally the Niners again) keep the consistency and look less foolish.

You gotta bring ass to get ass.

by SpurredOn on Sep 27, 2009 1:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email ninersnation@gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Site Decorum: Remember, We Are ALL 49er Fans
Steve_young_small
Game Day Food

Recent FanPosts

Download2_small
Can the 49'ers Maintain their Turnover Differential in 2012?
Sfak_small
Why are you a 49er fan?
6a00e5500c77218833011168f234b4970c_small
FOX: "How To Save The Sport"
Small
Old Spice Patrick Willis Football ProCamp
Dave_small
Call For Moderators
Crabtree_small
Buying "fake" or old 49er jerseys
Small
Anyone else travelling to Lambeau for Opening Game 9/9 ??
Small
Alex Smith, Top 10 Quarterback

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Ball Coach

Dave_small David Fucillo

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

313483_2054510893373_1562580382_31984672_1965025_n_small James Brady

Coordinator

Pirates_small smileyman

Bowman_avi_sm_small Tre9er

Assistant Coach

Pixies_logo_small (Florida) Danny Tuccitto

Memento-lies_small urnext

Me_on_beach_small WesHanson

Dylan_cannes_small Dylan DeSimone

Officiating Crew

Jackalope_card_small wjackalope

These3words_small these3words

Joe_and_bill_small twolfe2

428030_10150598134996875_112852666874_9167376_1157036734_n_small mikeinsp