49ers-Vikings: A Q&A with Daily Norseman
We've had yet another great week of discussion in the opposing blogger FanPost. Big thanks to Gonzo and his followers, and of course great discussion from NN readers as well. However, I had a few specific questions I wanted to draw out in our weekly Q&A with an opposing blogger. Gonzo was kind enough to answer a few of our questions about a variety of Vikings-related issues heading into tomorrow's huge contest between the 2-0 squads. I also answered 5 questions for Gonzo. Feel free to head over and check out the answers and provide your own insight. Remember, NFC dominance is on the line.
NN: Favre! Favre! Favre! Ok, needed to get that out of my system. Given that Adrian Peterson is such a beast, is the Vikings offensive scheme intended to minimize Favre's passing opportunities and basically be some sort of advanced game manager? Can you provide us some details on Favre's role in the offense?
DN: The thing about the Vikings' offensive scheme thus far is that Favre is still clearly getting a grasp of the system and, more importantly, the tendencies of his teammates. As I said in a post earlier this week, it seems that the Vikings sort of treated the Cleveland and Detroit games as extensions of the pre-season in order to give Favre some more work and build his rapport with his teammates. It's amazing to me that the guy went out and completed 85% of his passes last week when he still, clearly, doesn't know all the nuances of the Vikings' offensive scheme. Now, they won't be able to get away with that this weekend against the Niners, and I think everybody knows that, so it will be interesting to see what kind of aerial attack we see from the Minnesota offense on Sunday.
NN: With the Williams Wall back in action this season, this would seem to be Frank Gore's biggest test of the season. Small sample size aside, Football Outsiders ranks your defense 3rd against the pass and 11th against the run. Will the Vikings focus on Gore and leave their corners out on an island given Shaun Hill's limitations? Or should 49ers expect a big mix of pass rush and run defense? And yes that last question is rather poorly worded.
DN: The Vikings will bring the heat on Shaun Hill in obvious passing situations. . .and if the Williams Wall and middle linebacker E.J. Henderson can step up their performances from the past couple of weeks, where the Vikings' rush defense has been weaker than we've become accustomed to, hopefully there will be a lot of "obvious passing situations." From what I've seen, the Vikings have run blitzed a whole heck of a lot during the first two weeks of the season, but I'm sure that's something that will change with a back like Frank Gore in the mix for San Francisco. But the Vikings feel that they can generally get enough pressure with their front four on defense that they can get away with blitzing just every so often, and against most teams that proves to be accurate.
Minnesota's offensive line has given up seven sacks in the first two games. The only two teams that have allowed more are. . .the two teams that Minnesota faces in the next two weeks, San Francisco and Green Bay. Given those numbers and the tendencies of both offenses thus far, I'd anticipate both quarterbacks going down a few times this Sunday.
NN: What's the deal with Harvin's migraines? Was this an issue in training camp or in the first weeks of the season?
DN: This is really the first time we've heard about Harvin having an issue with migraines. He had a couple of incidents during the off-season when he was ill, but they were dismissed as him having the flu. I'm hoping that this doesn't turn out to be a serious problem. He's listed as questionable for Sunday's contest, so we'll have to see what happens there.
NN: Brad Childress doesn't get a lot of love nationally. What does he bring to the table as a coach? Or are the VIkings successful in spite of him?
DN: I'll begrudgingly admit that Childress has gotten better as a coach in the time he's been in Minnesota. His offensive play calling is sadly predictable most of the time, but that's something that could change starting this weekend, depending on how comfortable he feels Favre is with the offense. But you can't argue with the fact that his team has improved by 2 victories every year he's been the head coach (6-10 to 8-8 to 10-6), and that the Vikings have added a lot more talent since he took over. He's still not my favorite Vikings' coach of all time, by any stretch, but he's getting better.
NN: Is there somebody under the radar that 49ers fans can expect to make an impact on Sunday?
DN: Percy Harvin has gotten a lot of the ink for the Vikings through the first two games between his running, receiving, and kickoff returns. But he hasn't been placed on the punt return unit. . .that distinction has gone to second-year man Darius Reynaud, and he's responded quite favorably to his new responsibilities. He's returned four punts (along with four fair catches), but in those four returns he's averaging 19 yards per return. Those sorts of things are difference makers, and given the opportunity, Reynaud could be the guy that Niners fans might not know about that makes a big impact on this Sunday's contest.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Viking view
Thanks for the gentlemanly exchange. Good work!
Isn't Favre's statistics in the Metrodome abysmal?
Does that concern any of the fans?
She asked, "why in the club you don't make it percipitate, you know make it rain when you can make it thunderstorm?" I said "why the world needs sun the hood needs funds, there's a war going on and half the battle is guns, how dare I throw it on the floor when people are poor, so I write like edgar allen to restore"
-A3000
BKA optimist prime- Got the Semi runin on 49er koolaid!!
They used to be
But Favre’s last five trips to the Metrodome have looked like this:
2003 – 18/28, 194 yards, 3 TD, 1 INT, 105.4 QB rating (Packers win 30-27)
2004 – 30/43, 365 yards, 3 TD, 1 INT, 109.2 QB rating (Packers win 34-31 and win NFC North)
2005 – 28/36, 315 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT, 121.6 QB rating (Packers lose 23-20 on last second 54-yard field goal)
2006 – 24/42, 347 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT, 100.0 QB rating (Packers win 23-17)
2007 – 32/45, 344 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT, 108.0 QB rating (Packers win 23-16, Favre sets all-time TD pass record)
In his last five trips to the Dome, he lit the Vikings up pretty good. . .and only lost once. The Vikings actually had more victories over the Packers at Lambeau over those seasons than they did over the Packers in Minnesota (they won at Lambeau in 2003 to open the season and 2005 in a Monday nighter).
Early in his career, Favre couldn’t BUY a win at the Dome. . .now it seems he can’t lose there. I, personally, hope that trend continues. (-:
The Daily Norseman - The greatest Vikings' site on the Internet!
by Christopher Gates on Sep 26, 2009 12:17 PM PDT up reply actions
Maybe the old Bones hate the cold now!
BKA optimist prime- Got the Semi runnin' on 49er koolaid!!
Blasphemous beings, the NINERS will never forget!!
I'm surprised
You didn’t mention Favre’s Lambeau loss to Minnesota in the playoffs as well.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
What are the differences between A.P. and Chester Taylor?
Running styles, receiving ability, and the way they’re used by the coaches. Thanks.
AD is the workhorse—really, what you’ve seen on the highlight reels tells a lot of what he can do. He’s extremely physical (went looking for contact last week when Det. defenders went low on him—or tried), he’s shifty, and he’s fast.
The knock on him his first two years were injuries (due to the upright running style) and a perceived inability to stay on the field as a 3rd down back. He wasn’t great at blitz recognition and caught adequately. He seems to have gotten better though.
Taylor is underrated—he could certainly start for a few teams. He’s a tough runner, moderately quick, catches well and is the “change of pace” back in that he becomes more of a threat to catch out of the backfield or take a delayed handoff. Taylor can take a short dump on 3rd and 10 and make the defense sweat because he doesn’t stop. His role’s been reduced a bit (from what I’ve seen) with Harvin in the fold, but he’s the type of guy who will beat you the second you forget about him.
Hope that helps somewhat.
Chester is
a very good NFL running back. The kind of guy who, given the opportunity to start behind an average offensive line and a coach committed to giving him 20 carries a game, can easily put up a 1200 yard season for you. And more than that, he’s proven himself to be a consummate professional—never raising a stink, executing every play and block assigned to him, etc etc. The only reason he’s not starting is because Adrian Peterson is so good that I catch myself watching him put up a 180 yard, 2 TD performance and feeling like he was only ‘OK’. A while back we were spoiled by Randy Moss doing the same sort of things. You know, those special athletes who never look like they’re trying very hard doing what they’re doing, and before you know it they’ve had an awesome game. That’s Adrian Peterson, and that’s the only reason Chester Taylor is willing to accept his role, because even CT recognizes who and what AP is.
I’m really looking forward to Willis-AP round 2 because I think it will make for some great football. Here’s to no injuries and a good, penalty free game! Let the best player win!
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
forgot
I’d also add that for an underrated player to watch—LB Chad Greenway (and to a lesser extent LB Ben Leber). Greenway was our first rounder a few years ago, got hurt and missed his rookie year and has really come on as of late. He’s smart and makes plays but doesn’t get the recognition that EJ and the rest of the defense gets.
"Come on Eddie, let's get serious."
by biggity2bit on Sep 26, 2009 10:03 PM PDT up reply actions
Who has more rushing yards this week?
Gore or Peterson? Anybody want to through out some guesses? I say 110 yds for AP and 107 for Gore.

by 

































