After T.O.: The 49ers' second best wide receiver last decade
Last week we kicked off our look back at the decade that was by assessing the 49ers' five biggest draft disappointments and the five best draft choices. There are some sites putting together ballots for every single position to determine an all-decade team. Initially I was going to do that, but I've decided to go more for positions where there is some question about it, and where the debate is a bit more intriguing.
For example, at quarterback, Jeff Garcia was the 49ers best QB this decade. I don't even think you can include other quarterbacks in the debate. Is somebody really going to argue Tim Rattay, Alex Smith, or Shaun Hill was better this decade? The same holds true at the #1 wide receiver spot. Even if you didn't like the man, Terrell Owens was the best 49ers wide receiver this past decade and I can't think of any remotely reasonable argument otherwise. From 2000-2003, TO had 370 receptions, 5,265 receiving yards, and 51 TDs. Nobody comes close to that.
However, that doesn't mean we can't debate who was the second best wide receiver for the 49ers this past decade. This isn't a question of who would be the best #2 receiver on a team. The question is simply, after TO, who was the best 49ers wide receiver this decade? And the response to that leaves a fairly motley list. It does include one season of Jerry Rice as a bit of a statistical baseline.
After the jump we run through the candidates...
Tai Streets (2000-2003): 166 receptions, 1,983 receiving yards, 13 touchdowns
Streets was a 6th round pick out of MIchigan in 1999, and would have gone in the second or third round had he not blown out his Achilles a few weeks before the draft in a pick-up basketball game. Once Streets recovered from the injury, the 49ers ended up with a fairly decent receiver. He played sparingly in 1999, but from 2000-2003 he put up very serviceable numbers. Not superstar numbers, but certainly serviceable. In 2002, he finished with 72 receptions and proved to be a very solid second banana to Terrell Owens. Throw in a steadily improving Eric Johnson (who would blow up 2 years later), and the 49ers had some decent receivers (JJ Stokes still stunk it up).
Arnaz Battle (2003-2009): 178 receptions, 2,150 receiving yards, 11 touchdowns
Battle gets a lot of crap, but given the context of his career with the 49ers (likely finished after this past season), he was a decent wide receiver to have. His best season came in 2006 when he snagged 59 balls for 686 yards and 3 touchdowns. I honestly think Battle was one guy who maximized his ability as a wide receiver. He was never going to be a superstar, but he was a very decent receiver for some awful teams. And given the 49ers punt return troubles this season, folks might have forgotten that Battle was actually a decent punt returner for a couple years.
J.J. Stokes (2000-2002): 116 receptions, 1,441 receiving yards, 11 touchdowns
Given that the 49ers moved up in the draft to grab JJ Stokes, it's easy for 49ers fans to be disappointed in his production. He definitely would have made a top 5 draft bust list of the 90s. However, during this past decade he was statistically the #3 or #4 receiver (depending on your thoughts on Brandon Lloyd). His best season came in 2001 when he finished with 54 receptions for 585 yards and 7 touchdowns. It's a shame he could never capitalize on his size and potential.
Brandon Lloyd (2003-2005): 105 receptions, 1,510 receiving yards, 13 touchdowns
There are definitely not a lot of 49ers fans who care for Brandon Lloyd. Another guy with talent who really couldn't do much with it during his time in San Francisco. At this point he's mostly remembered for this fine maneuver. His best season (as a 49er AND as a pro) was his last with the team (2005), when he finished with 48 catches for 733 yards and 5 touchdowns. Considering how awful that 2005 team was (Lloyd was easily their leading receiver), those numbers might be a small miracle.
Cedrick Wilson (2001-2004): 97 receptions, 1,203 receiving yards, 6 touchdowns
As you can see, we're really scraping the bottom of the barrel for this group. Wilson was a decent enough receiver for the 49ers, and during his best year (2004), he was arguably their best wide receiver, leading their WRs in catches and yards. Wilson finished that season with 47 catches for 641 yards and 3 touchdowns. Eric Johnson was the leading overall receiver that year.
Isaac Bruce (2008-2009): 82 receptions, 1,099 yards, 7 touchdowns
In two seasons (or really one and a half since he sat out much of the second half of this season), Bruce put together decent numbers. In 2008 he was the team's leading receiver with 61 catches for 835 yards, which tied Frank Gore for the most receptions in a season since 2004, and was the most yards since TO in 2003. He was JTO/Shaun Hill's go-to guy for much of 2008 and showed he still had a trick or two up his sleeve. This past season started slowly and never really got going before he stepped aside to let the young receivers step up.
Jerry Rice (2000): 75 receptions, 805 receiving yards, 7 touchdowns
This was Rice's final season with the 49ers and he showed he still had something in the tank. He was officially the #2 man behind TO at this point, but he put together a #2 season we would love to see from Josh Morgan. I was concerned including Rice would lead to a skewed result, but I figure what the heck. Everybody here can decide for themselves who they think was the second best receiver this decade.
34 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Why I voted for Jerry
So much for the phrase it’s easier to forgive than forget . . . I’ve chosen to forget.
It really, really is depressing.
What a bleak decade. The 2000’s really have limited my ability to feel empathy for fans of most other teams. Thanks to Battle for his hard work but (no offense to him) I hope next decade there’s no one close to what he did for us in the discussion for top 4 WR, let alone top 2.
why?
Actually, I’ll take Michael Crabtree….and barring health issues and leaving as FA, I expect he will be by far the best of this next decade. Of course, maybe the 9ers will find someone else comparable or faster to go with him-I expect greatness from him, as he will settle for nothing less.
Prima donna? Maybe, but like TO, keeps in great shape and wants to be best and wants to do anything to win. Blocks, excellent hands (drops were not all his fault…it’s a drop if he touches it, but some were from passes most receivers don’t touch). Yes, he did have 2 bad ones, but Rice had at least a dozen as a rookie. He turned out OK…TO had at least a dozen and physically he turned out OK
i would like some of whatever
those 7 people who voted for Brandon Lloyd are smoking
"The Football The 49ers Team has The excitement of the bear, the velocity of the deer and strenght of the buffalo.
statistically
he did have the best average yards/year and TD’s/year though…
"Vernon is going to be a great tight end one day, but he's got to put the whole package together." - Thanks Sing for echoing this.
I heard a funny quote
a guy said that Brandon Lloyd has had so many drops that when on the cell phone, if something happens he refers to it as “the call got Brandon Lloyd’ed”
"Vernon is going to be a great tight end one day, but he's got to put the whole package together." - Thanks Sing for echoing this.
oh man
that dude made some circus catches while he was here. Then again, he also dropped a lot of balls that were right in his breadbasket.
Sharlon Schoop - de favoriete Nederlandse honkbalspeler van McCovey Chronicles.
You always have to be one step ahead of your drunk friends
--Daisy Owl
I'm looking at the good years of the decade 2001-02
And only two names stand out, J.J. Stokes in 01 and Tai Streets in 02. For that I’m going with either one because numbers when you look at how the decade went in general really are only significant when they contributed to a successful season. If we only look at numbers, then you’d have to say Rice or Bruce because they led in receptions and yards respectively for a 2nd WR for a single season in the decade.
Kinda hard to believe the leader in receptions & yardage in 2004 was a TE! But they were 2-14 that year, so go figure.
my vote is for Battle
we was with this team for most of the decade, and until really this year he put up solid but unspectacular numbers most years. He was a constant on a team that lacked any identity, and he was the safety valve for every mediocre QB we threw out there. In terms of actual long term impact, he was the most important WR of this group.
A hearty thank you to Rich Aurilia for all the good memories, and to the Niners for finally getting the uni's (mostly) right.
How I've got high hopes for the future...
Crabtree and Morgan. If we can keep them around, it should be fun.
Just remember, the 49ers have had 2 of the top 5 QB’s of all time and 3 of the top 10 WR’s of all time.
We’re so damn lucky.
Jerry will always be a # 1 in my mind
I cannot bring myself to vote for him as a # 2
Tim Tebow = 1,432,219 season tickets next year. Who wouldn't pick him in the 1st round with those projections?
by Drew Kerr on Jan 11, 2010 11:48 AM PST reply actions 2 recs
any "best of" list with jerry gets my vote
he deserves that kind of respect not only from fans but from whom he played with and against
Arnaz Battle
would get my vote, but I’m going to stay out of voting. Why? Because even after just one season in the decade, well one partial season, Michael Crabtree would get my vote. Well, Crabs or Josh Morgan. I can’t bring myself to vote for Battle, Streets or Rice.
by Andrew Davidson on Jan 11, 2010 12:04 PM PST reply actions
JR
Jerry looks good just running his routes even if the pass sails past him or he even fumbles the ball. lol
Lloyd had some rediculous catches I remember, but overall a disapointment. I choose Battle for doing ok on such wretched teams.
Lloyd was our FUTURE!!!
Is what i thought after spectacular preseason TD’s but the seasons came up flat
same here
I was all about Lloyd and then he pretty much disappeared.
A hearty thank you to Rich Aurilia for all the good memories, and to the Niners for finally getting the uni's (mostly) right.
I think that Streets was the better WR
But battle was a better overall contributor
Bruce..
for one thing, he is a legitimate WR. Another is that he had Hill tossing passes at him. One more is that he helped the 49ers win games they could have lost.
Well, we're waiting....
What about Antonio Bryant?
His time with us was short, but he’s more deserving of votes than most of the names on this list.
Were it not for his off-the-field issues, he’d have very likely had the best statistical season(s) out of any of the players.
"It came down like a punt, Coach!" - Josh Morgan
Good suggestion
I’d vote for him over 6 of the guys on this list. He had actual talent, also young enough to still use that talent.
Bryant
In one season he had 40 catches for 733 yards. He’s certainly talented, but I decided to go with Rice’s 2000 season as the statistical baseline.
by David Fucillo on Jan 11, 2010 5:21 PM PST up reply actions
My question is why T.O. isn't on the Greatest Niners list on the lefthand side of the site
I mean people hate him but honestly he was a better WR than John Taylor.
Gimme 1 round!
vote
It was a vote by the people and the people definitely don’t like TO (I voted for TO).
by David Fucillo on Jan 12, 2010 9:20 AM PST up reply actions
I voted for John Taylor
I do what I want!
"The Football The 49ers Team has The excitement of the bear, the velocity of the deer and strenght of the buffalo.
Makes sense
I’d have voted Stubby as the 2nd DT even though his best season came while Bryant young was getting double teamed and he was on roids. He did win Defensive PotY.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jan 13, 2010 1:07 AM PST up reply actions

by 



























