Wild Card Weekend
Wild card weekend got the NFL playoffs rolling and as has been the case in the NFL all season, most of the games were decidedly one sided affairs. The Cowboys got their first playoff win since 1996. The Bengals are still looking for their first playoff win since 1990. The Patriots found out this is a new decade and that they're no longer the team to beat. And the Packers and Cardinals took turns demonstrating who's defense could look more inept. So let's start things off with the game that has everyone talking.
Packers 45, Cardinals 51
If you're a fan of high powered offenses, non-existent defenses, and horrible officiating, than this was the game for you. The Packers and Cardinals combined to have the highest scoring playoff game in NFL history and the Packers came up just short of having the 3rd biggest come from behind victory in playoff history after they managed to overcome a 31-10 3rd quarter deficit to tie it up at 45-45 and send the game to overtime. Kurt Warner tore apart the Packers secondary, completing 29 of 33 passes for 379 yards and 5 TD's. In fact, Warner was so good that he had more TD's (5) then incompletions (4). Aaron Rodgers, starting his first playoff game, was almost as good completing 28 of 42 passes for 422 yards and 4 TD's. But it was his interception on the first play of the game and his fumble on the last play of the game, that did in the Packers. But that last Packers possession wasn't without controversy. Two plays before the fumble, their was an obvious helmet to helmet collision to Rodgers. The only reason I can guess as to why the official missed it was because he was too busy pulling out his flag on a holding penalty. Then on the fumble, their was an obvious face mask penalty as Michael Adams grabbed Rodgers face mask while forcing the fumble. Since Rodgers was already losing the ball when Adams grabbed the facemask, the Cardinals would still have gotten the turnover. They just would have gotten it at their own 32 instead of the game ending on the play. Considering Neil Rackers missed a 34 yard FG at the end of regulation, getting the ball at the 32 was no guarantee of a victory. Not that I really care. I hate the Packers and love to see them lose. It's just that I haven't seen officiating affect the outcome of a game this much since the Seahawks lost to the Steelers in the Super Bowl.
Jets 24, Bengals 14
The Bengals felt they were going to win this game because of some advantages they held over the Jets in key areas. They felt Carson Palmer would outplay Mark Sanchez who was playing in his first playoff game and finished second in the NFL with 20 interceptions. They felt they had an advantage in the kicking game with Shayne Graham, who was their franchised player this season, having hit 12 straight FG's and 16 of his last 17. And they felt they had an advantage in coaching with Marvin Lewis having coached a playoff game before, while Rex Ryan was a rookie head coach. But in an ironic twist, all three of those areas were the reasons they lost. The Jets stuck to their strategy of limiting the amount of times Sanchez throws, and thereby can hurt them, by running the ball 41 times while throwing it only 15. But in those 15 throws Sanchez was almost perfect, completing 12 for 182 yards and 1 TD. While fellow USC alum, Carson Palmer, only completed half of his 36 passes for 146 yards, with 1 TD and 1 costly interception. Jay Feely took over punting duties for the Jets because of an injury to punter Steve Weatherford, and averaged a decent 31.4 yards while also pinning the Bengals inside the 20 three times and hitting his one FG attempt to put the Jets up by 10 with only 5:47 to play. Shayne Graham, on the other hand, horribly missed both his FG attempts of 28 and 42 yards, including one with 3:49 to play that all but ended the game. And Marvin Lewis made two bad coaching challanges in the first quarter that left the Bengals with only 1 timeout for the half, and no more challenges for the game. An enthused Ryan told reporters after the game of Sanchez's performance, "He had the eye of the tiger today and he was ready to go out there and throw it around." Please tell me he didn't just make a "Rocky" reference.
Eagles 14, Cowboys 34
The Cowboys had lost 6 straight playoff games, and a 7th would have been an NFL record. Wade Phillips had gone 0-4 as a head coach in playoff games, including stints in Denver and Buffalo. Tony Romo was 0-2 as a starter in playoff games including his infamous bobble of a chip shot FG at the end of a 21-20 loss to the Seahawks. Meanwhile, the Eagles were the exact opposite. Andy Reid was 7-0 as a head coach in first round playoff games with Donovav McNabb being the starter for six of them. So the Eagles should have been a lock to win. To bad the game's not about what should have been. The Cowboys defense was the immovable object, giving up only a 73 yard TD pass by Michael Vick through the first 3 quarters, while the Cowboys offense was the unstoppable force. After the Eagles tied it up 7-7, the Cowboys scored on 5 straight drives in the second quarter, and only once in the game did they have a 3 and out. "They were the better team all the way around," Reid said in his post game press conference. "When you get your tail kicked, it's not a great feeling. No one expected it." Certainly not DeSean Jackson who tweeted during the week, "We gonna sting [them]." Then again, considering the 24-0 smack down the Cowboys put on the Eagles just last week, maybe we should have expected it. Now I get to look forward to a meeting between two teams I hope both lose (Cowboys @ Vikings). I guess the silver lining is that between Favre and the Cowboys, I won't have to hear about the greatness of at least one of them by this time next week. Then again, knowing the media, they'll find a way to work it in.
Ravens 33, Patriots 14
On the first play from scrimmage, Ray Rice set the precedent for the game by running the ball 83 yards for a TD. A few minutes later, Le'Ron McClain was punching it in from 1 yard out. Less than 5 minutes after the start of the game, the Patriots found themselves trailing by 14. By the end of the first quarter they were down 24-0. For fans that haven't seen their team lose at home all season, and have never seen them lose a playoff game at Gillette Stadium, it was too much to take. Boos started raining down on a team that no longer looks like the king of the hill. "I'd have been booing us, too, the way we played." Tom Brady said afterwards. It was easily the worst playoff performance in Brady's career as he completed 23 of 42 passes for only 154 yards as well as throwing 3 interceptions. Not that Joe Flacco was any better. Flacco was only 4 for 10 for 34 yards and 1 interception. But considering how the Ravens were able to plow through the Patriots defense for 234 yards on the ground, Flacco didn't need to be that good. It was a tough loss for a Patriots team that had such high expectations. Co-captain Jarod Mayo refused to answer questions by simply saying in a soft voice, "It's just so hard right now." Randy Moss also ducked out without saying anything, not that it should surprise anyone. You have to wonder how much the loss of Wes Welker hurt them, although I doubt he could have done much to prevent them from being down 24-0 so early. Chris Carr, who intercepted a pass to set up a TD said, "Everyone expected to win. The more we watched film, we would tell each other during the week that we felt we were better than this team." I imagine a lot of teams are thinking the same thing right now.
0 recs |
123 comments
|
Comments
Good news / bad news
Good news: the 49er defense is clearly better than five of the six NFC playoff teams’. No way they allow 45 points to GB or AZ.
Bad news: the 49er QB is clearly not as good as any of the six NFC playoff teams’. No way they score 45 points against GB or AZ.
While Warner and Favre approach retirement, improvement from Smith puts the Niners right in the thick with these teams. Here’s to hoping it happens.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 1:19 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
AZ and GB went..
a whole ‘nuther level in the playoffs, and the QB’s alone were stellar, not to mention AZ’s defense in the first half. Playoff football is another animal, unlike beating scrub teams late or having a favorable division.
The 49er offense needs more than having Smith improve to be a playoff contender next season. The defense? Maybe in the top ten overall (not counting DVOA). But they still need to defend the pass better.
Reality is Smith will hold the offense back if they have to depend on him. No way will Smith be near Rodgers or Warner. Nobody should discount that display yesterday with a comparison to the 49ers this season. Post-season Warner is making him a lock for the HOF alone, and GB’s pass defense is one of the best in the League.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 11, 2010 2:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Playoffs are about matchups as much anything
Niners match up quite well with AZ. GB finally showed how much they missed Al Harris. More importantly is that they could not pressure Warner. Don’t do that, can’t beat him. Niners are able to pressure Warner with four men. 25 points allowed in two games. Matchups. Knowing their tendencies by playing them twice a year also helps.
AZ had the same schedule as SF with two easier teams (NY v Philly, Carolina v Atlanta). They also finished the season with games against the same Lions and Rams. Whatever passive criticism you want to throw at SF you have to also throw at AZ.
I do think that though both defenses were quite pathetic at times, more credit should be given to QBs and WRs on both teams. The receivers made some incredible catches, showing again that it’s not just about the QB.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 3:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's why I posted..
Playoff AZ with Warner, like when AZ went to the SB with a 9-7 record, stumbling into the playoffs. Warner was quicker and faster than he was during the regular season yesterday, and the AZ defense as well as the o-line gave Warner plenty of time to throw the ball. He had more TD passes than incompletions. GB still has a defensive DPOTY candidate in Woodson in the secondary. They’re still one of the best pass defenses despite losing Harris in week 10. I’m not throwing passive criticism at the 49ers to counter your effusive bloated praise. I’m taking football as it is right now, and in the post season, the 49er defense could not win this particular game with Smith playing better than he is right now, because Smith isn’t a good enough QB to overcome what Rodgers did.
But the 49er defense isn’t playoff ready yet, nor could they carry the team to the playoffs this season on their own. Why? Because of the offense as a whole, that’s why. The defense still isn’t as good as NYJ’s, with a rookie QB at the helm who plays in the NFCE.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 11, 2010 3:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What Rodgers did
You mean the 8 or 9 sacks that were on him cause he held the ball for 10 seconds in the pocket? Rodgers is the next McNabb – Grossly overrated because he plays with a great set of players. Oh and he’s like McNabb in that he’ll always choke in the big one.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jan 11, 2010 3:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL..
Rodgers played in his first playoff game yesterday.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 11, 2010 3:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And he almost threw a game ending Int scrambling from pressure,
facing away from the line of scrimmage and throwing across his body directly to two defenders. Had the defenders not run into each other the game was over right there. Completely due to his poor decision making.
McNabbesque in nature.
McNabbesque: To snatch defeat from the jaws of victory due solely to ones own stupidity despite having every advantage
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jan 11, 2010 3:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I still don't see how one post season game..
matches with McNabb’s entire post season career here. I just don’t.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 11, 2010 3:57 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It hasn't yet
And maybe he can change it. But he and McNabb are very similar players. They are both exceedingly talented physically but they both rely on that so much that they make incredibly dumb decisions. Like the would be pick down on the 10 that Rodgers lucked out of.
Maybe Rodgers grows out of it like McNabb never could. I hope not so I can laugh at the Pack every single year.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jan 11, 2010 3:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think Rodgers is as dumb..
or reckless as McNabb. Sure AR made some mistakes, but he didn’t fold up or make even more killer ones down the stretch. For a first big time playoff game, he came off as very impressive.
But yeah, it does suck that he plays for the Pack instead of the 49ers, but we all know that story.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 11, 2010 4:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I honestly think Alex has a higher ceiling
But he has played in a horrible situation. Aaron Rodgers may end up as a Warren Moon with a million passing yards but Alex going back to college was a WAY more intellectual player. Its a shame Nolan threw him under the bus and nearly ended his career with that shoulder and that he hasn’t had an offensive system for more than a year. And of course the 2 seconds of protection that he plays with. As I said elsewhere though. Having that 2-3 second clock in his head from learning with so little protection could be a great help when he starts getting 4 and 5 seconds behind a real OL. He might even have time to get through 3 reads then.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jan 11, 2010 4:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't see how Rodgers..
isn’t and “Intellectual” player. To me, that’s more of a problem when it comes to Smith, is that he may be more of and “Intellectual” player than a cerebral player. I think Rodgers has a high football IQ, and is very cerebral. Smith is damn slow in the pocket too. Rodgers played faster than he had all season. Rodgers has shown tremendous upside this season, and looks to be a legit Top Tier QB. Dude has arrived. He can only get better too.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 11, 2010 4:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That pass down on the 10 yard line was as stupid as it gets
And he takes forever to decide what to do in the pocket if the scheme doesn’t tell him what to do. He only knows how to deal with a blitz cause he knows the scheme and the hot route. Whenever something goes awry from the scheme he stands there for 10 seconds holding the ball confused. He is instinctual the same way McNabb is.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jan 11, 2010 4:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Rodgers probably passed for more TDs, Yards and completions in a playoff game than McNabb has accumulated his entire career.
by bignerd on Jan 11, 2010 3:52 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No McNabb often goes for big numbers
but when the game is on the line he throws some completely ill advised pass and gets intercepted… Or waits in the pocket too long and is stripped for a game ending fumble return.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jan 11, 2010 3:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You make no sense. Again
And you did throw out weak, passive criticism via late season opponents.. Despite AZ having the same opponents. And you also know I have no bloated praise of the Niners. I also didn’t say the Niners would win. But they do matchup with AZ better than GB does. Because they pressure Warner, which GB didn’t. Thus the Niners would have a chance since Smith wouldn’t have to play like Rodgers. What would the reuslt be? I have no idea. If against GB likely a loss. But as a fan I’d like the chance to find out against either team, especially if the game were at Candlestick. Thus we’re chatting on a fan board. You don’t ever know until the game is played, as the majority who picked AZ to lose yesterday and thoughout last post-season learned.
It’s like talking to a petulant child… This is not difficult to understand. I hope you now do.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 3:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Why is it..
You get pissy when I post? Do you need to try and throw insults? Because if you want to go down that road, be prepared when I bring it to you, because I can and will make you look stupid.
If you didn’t see the 49ers stumble to 8-8 playing against the 2 worst teams in the NFL late into their season, then you don’t see how this game yesterday is way different than regular season play in AZ, like last season. This is what you don’t get. That’s why you get pissed, because you are idiotic blind homer that has no idea what you are talking about.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 11, 2010 3:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
both of you need to settle down
The last line of both your comments was not necessary. It just turns the comments into childish rants.
by Fooch on Jan 11, 2010 3:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I've kept it Civil..
But I’m not gonna take any crap here Fooch. If someone want’s it, I’ll bring it. I posted nothing to warrant that comment, but I’m a big boy, so I can handle myself.
I’m not gonna apologize for it either.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 11, 2010 3:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That's why I'm telling...
both of you. It’s not an issue of who started it. It’s just an issue of not doing it entirely.
by Fooch on Jan 11, 2010 3:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
drummer please
You do a good job of making yourself look the part. You would fail at trying to do it to me. Or pretty much anyone else. And I needn’t read again about some Rams fans ten years ago who you scared. That you get angry at being called out for inconsistencies is not something I can help you with. That I see them does not make me homer.
Now, getting back to football, the Niners could’ve been just as good an opponent for either team yesterday. Certainly AZ moreso than GB. Why you keep bringing up the final two games makes no sense since it is of no consequence. That I want to see such a game makes me fan, not a homer. Learn the difference.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 3:45 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The final 2 games..
are indicators of how a team plays in DEC. Why is it that you fail at seeing that?
BTW, another board in another place and time isn’t relevant here. But you are the master at irrelevance, thus your Modus Operandi. But I did own them like I do you if you were wondering.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 11, 2010 3:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
Keep telling yourself that. Denial is your friend… lol.. I certainly don’t brag about my ownage of you. No one is interested in buying.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 3:51 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And here it is..
Now, you had to pull an old card out from a different thread that had nothing to so with the subject at hand, and then you posted even more irrelevance that brought you into my game here. You can’t counter with relevant issues. That’s given by your responses.
I’m not bragging on owning you. I’m just posting what i always post.
Reality.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 11, 2010 3:56 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You're still off-topic
And making no sense. You don’t stay on topic when it relates to football and when that’s pointed out you can’t stay on football as a topic. Then this:
brought you into my game here
Hmm. I’d advise that the patient needs to grow up. Or get a life. Both would be best.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 4:02 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The topic is football..
not a past message board that you didn’t post on and know nothing about.
Oh, I see how you tried to slip outta that one.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 11, 2010 4:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No slippage
That was a response that pointed out that your weak attempts at intimidation create only laughter, not fear. As I said before, all mouth no fist. And you’ve posted that pathetic story more than once, as some sort of web-cred. It certainly says all about you that need be said.
I understand why you get off topic. You can’t win. It just makes having a discussion more difficult and usually not worth doing.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 4:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Again..
That had nothing to do with the topic at hand, which is football. Everything I posted was and is relevant to the subject at hand, and you got pissy because it was I who posted it, and has a point you still can’t refute or even grasp because it the truth. So, you went to something you knew even more less about, and you are still acting pissy even though Fooch has posted a warning about civility and insults, to which I never insulted the poster, just the poster’s inane idea’s. Like your football posts, for example. It’s bad enough that they are empty and fallacious, but it’s worse that you think they have real value and even less disturbing that you actually believe in them. You should change your name to SpurredOsteen or something. I have a spare tent somewhere. You can start your own Homer revival’s in the Stick’s parking lot.
I can see that you can’t admit that you’re wrong here, but chalk that up as another SpurredOn trait of bringing ass for me to slap here.
LOL, you should lose that Sig because it’s too easy to kick.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 11, 2010 4:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Nice projection
Glad you see yourself they way most posters do.
you got pissy because it was I who posted it, and has a point you still can’t refute or even grasp because it the truth. So, you went to something you knew even more less about, and you are still acting pissy even though Fooch has posted a warning about civility and insults
- you in a nutshell
Like your football posts, for example. It’s bad enough that they are empty and fallacious, but it’s worse that you think they have real value and even less disturbing that you actually believe in them.
- you 90% of the time. Again, glad you see yourself the same way. I see my jealous stalker has returned.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 4:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You know..
one thing you forget about this whole thing is that despite AZ turning the ball over against SF, they were only 8 points behind in the 4th quarter. That was AZ at it’s worst. Not AZ in it’s playoff mode.
But I digress. You can continue posting more prissiness than football. I’ve made my point already, and now you’re into full on meltdown mode. I’ve done my job here and derailed you into what you have become here in this thread. The way I did it was simple.
I posted the reality.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 11, 2010 4:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry that you're having a meltdown
But you brought it on yourself. Take a breath, step away from the computer and step outside. You shouldn’t start stuff you can’t finish as no one is scared of you. Your prissiness is the least of your flaws.
If you want to get back to football, I think you’re making excuses for AZ instead of crediting the Niners for their play in the MN game. They were coming off their best game of the season. They then looked their worst because SF made them look bad. We just have to disagree on that.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 4:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yet..
AZ played lights out on offense yesterday. If you don’t know AZ, then you don’t know about that MNF game, where I posted the whole time how they are a stupid team here in that thread.
But of course, it comes down to how my homerism isn’t up to your standards of homerism, and that’s why you are here, to help calm the homer masses by invoking Walsh or posting how the 49er defense is better than most of the playoff defenses that are playing right now, in the playoffs, who are playing right now, in the playoffs, where the 49er aren’t playing, in the playoffs, and how Smith can improve to play against these defenses that are in the playoffs, when he has never led a team to this thing called the playoffs, and that his OC has only had one offense in the playoffs, which was when John Robinson last went to the playoffs.
Did you get all this, or are you still thinking the 49ers are playing this upcoming weekend in that thing called the playoffs?
Next week: SpurredOn will post that had the 49ers made this thing called the playoffs, they could have beaten the winning NFC teams if Smith had improved since the 49ers aren’t in the playoffs, but we can imagine how they would play if they had played well enough to beat a SEA team to give them a shot at playing in this thing called the playoffs.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 11, 2010 4:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Meltdown indeed
Ranting about nothing. What did you say about your posts earlier:
It’s bad enough that they are empty and fallacious, but it’s worse that you think they have real value and even less disturbing that you actually believe in them.
Thank you for providing an example. We know you’re not a homer. But it’s easy to see what you are..
BTW: Just to help with your next empty insult, I actually don’t like people comparing everything to the Walsh era since no coach will ever live up to him. I just don’t antagonize those who do. You should learn this lesson.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 4:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
What about this thing called the playoffs?..
BTW, you have invoked Walsh especially when it comes to Singletary.
It’s true.
Nice way of KYOA.
Did I mention playoffs?
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 11, 2010 5:01 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
BTW..
http://www.ninersnation.com/2010/1/5/1233869/mike-singletary-approval-rating#28297915
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 11, 2010 5:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And as for the link
True ownage of you. I knew that’s what you were thinking of, only you’re to simple to actually read it for what it was: a playful reference to do something being the Walsh way. Like people wanting Sing to run the West Coast (Walsh’s) offense. He started these things. Anyone who now does it is doing a Walsh thing. Much different than demanding that a coach do what Walsh did because it was Walsh.
It’s almost exhausting teaching you. A second job. Have you learned anything over the years?
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 5:15 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So..
You don’t like people invoking Walsh, and the only person who can is you? Is that what it is?
Ah yes, SpurredOn failing to admit he was wrong once again. Not that we would expect him to admit it, but it’s nice to see the reality.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 11, 2010 5:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The answer was already included in the post
I can’t make you read. Though it is fundemental. Should I be wrong I’ll admit it. What’s nice is being right about you. And you know it. And it created a full meltdown. You can’t win, even if your false reality.
Even better? You posted something out of context (perhaps not able to process the easiest things?) after posting this:
you had to pull an old card out from a different thread
LOL.. You’re like a really bad, old politician who doesn’t know that their foolishness is out there for everyone to see.. lol.. too funny. A walking joke.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 5:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Let me ask you this..
can you link to that Ram message board that you mentioned?
I mean it has nothing to do with Niners Nation, this thread, but since you brought it up first, maybe you should enlighten this forum to what you alluded to in that post.
That would be very transparent of you, backing up what you claim.
So, how about it? Link?
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 11, 2010 5:44 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Link?
Still in need of attention huh? Here goes: why would I bother looking for a link containing another of your pointless posts? You’re the lonely guy who has shared the story more than once. Recalling the old days when someone was foolish enough to be intimidated by you. Sad. That I shot you down before you could go there again has you all steamed, shaking at your computer like a wet dog. That’s actually quite sad.
Unlike you I have a life… Try one. They’re nice.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 6:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sitting here..
wondering how you dare claim to be “above it all” after your display here.
I know you don’t seem to get it, but I can’t see why you have to prove that you don’t.
But keep going. Every new post shows just how much you’re “above” what you dismiss.
Bwah!
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 11, 2010 7:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You mean when I said:
improvement from Smith puts the Niners right in the thick with these teams. Here’s to hoping it happens.
Or this:
Thus the Niners would have a chance since Smith wouldn’t have to play like Rodgers. What would the result be? I have no idea. If against GB likely a loss. But as a fan I’d like the chance to find out against either team, especially if the game were at Candlestick.
Where is there mention that they made the playoffs? Oh, there is none. Just more empty ranting from drummer boy. Try again… Next blind rant in 5, 4, 3, 2…
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 5:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Here it is:
Good news: the 49er defense is clearly better than five of the six NFC playoff teams’. No way they allow 45 points to GB or AZ.
Seems like you mentioned playoffs here. I just brought up how a lot of playoff defenses are better than the 49ers like pass defense. Thus, you getting pissy.
I can see how you selectively forget things, like invoking Walsh.
Hey, get back to me during the s00p3r b0wl, and tell me how the 49ers would have played if they had made it.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 11, 2010 5:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You proved yourself wrong again
Did you forget that the whole thread is there for everyone to see? A typical drummer thread ends as it always does… him on the bottom looking up, wondering how it all went wrong. Better luck next time. And knowing you, there will be a next time.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 5:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
So you're telling us...
That you’re gonna cease with the comparisons of the 49ers to the playoff teams? Wouldn’t that make all of what you posted a moot point?
Well, I knew it was a horrid premise to begin with, but I’m glad to see you argue it with such fervor as you have been.
Or is that what you are doing here?
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 11, 2010 5:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That you equate comparing the Niners to playoff teams as homerism shows you don’t know the definition of the world. Especially since they played four of those six teams. Seems a good place to start.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 6:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I equate Homerism..
To making a statement easily refuted (since, well, this season has been covered extensively here, with all kinds of data and debate) because it was a rather pedantic statement to begin with, and then getting very defensive because it lead to having to back it up with substance.
Which you still struggle with BTW.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 11, 2010 7:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You still need attention?
I’m starting to think you’re actually a lonely high schooler. You’ve been called out and dismissed a few times today, going back to my original response of your poorly stated original response. You can’t take having your foolishness called out. Either get it right the first time or learn to accept some corrections.
Time to again leave you as you are accustomed: alone. I’d bet money you’ll be back for more..
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 10:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Again, you contradict yourself..
Let’s get something straight, shall we? I don’t front like I’m “above it all” and pose like you are doing right now. I’m sure this isn’t working out as well as you thought it would, but of course, you weren’t that bright enough to figure that out before you made yourself “the victim” to now posing as “the aggressor”. It’s very transparent, petty, and amateurish. Typical. But it doesnt discount your foolish and otherwise weak attempt at posting a valid comparison of the playoff teams to the 49ers. I guess next week, if the Cards get blown out by NO, you would say that the 49er defense would have a chance at beating NO simply because you think the 49ers with an improved Smith could be competitive against NO. But hey, what if your worst nightmare happened and the Cards beat NO? That would put you in a conundrum here. Because if DAL beats MIN, and faces AZ, you would have to come up with a scenario of even more what if’s.
You know, I’ve praised the 49er defense throughout most of the season, and everybody who reads ny posts know that, even you. But I don’t see them as better than most of the playoff defenses, simply because they weren’t good enough to get them to the playoffs. It’s more of a combo of offensive inefficiency combined with poor pass defense, but guess what? They’ll be a true playoff contender in 2 years with a better QB and OC. Even you in the comments below allude to the playoff defenses as a whole (“If the 49ers had Ware and Ratliff”, which they don’t BTW), comments derived from one of my posts. So there is even more of you contradicting yourself, much like the whole “I don’t like people who invoke Walsh” thingy, which was blown from cover because you tend to get too butt happy with your own self.
So here we are, with you standing over there wondering how the hell you wound up in that spot, and me showing you how I led you down this path. Do you know where you are? Your standing in a puddle of reality, and I had to lead you by the nose to get you to drink it. How does it taste? As bitter as you’ve described it during your diatribes of fail from this post:
http://www.ninersnation.com/2010/1/11/1245404/wild-card-weekend#28648648
and beyond?
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 12, 2010 12:17 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You've been used. Again.
I do thank you for making this fun. I’ve never had a web obsessor before. Stationed in your head without effort. You’re getting used like an old wash rag. Rinse and repeat.. LOL… Such a tool…
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 12, 2010 12:44 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm..
I certainly don’t brag about my ownage of you
http://www.ninersnation.com/2010/1/11/1245404/wild-card-weekend#28657661
Yeah, you really are this stupid.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 12, 2010 1:08 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow.
The long jilted lover letter was the best. News flash: I’m not into you. Don’t even respect you. And have already dismissed you on football matters. What remains? To go back and re-debate this, after already handling you, would be a waste of my time. You’re certainly free to continue wasting yours though I do appreciate the laugh.
For now I’ll end this and offer that you really should get help. Fine line between obsessive freak and plain pathetic; you’re dancing on it.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 12, 2010 1:17 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I'm..
The obsessive one here.
If I was such as waste of your time, then I guess you wouldn’t be responding. Way to again, show you’re “above it all” while slapping your own ass at the same time.
LOL.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 12, 2010 1:24 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Gotta add one more thing here..
True ownage of you.
http://www.ninersnation.com/2010/1/11/1245404/wild-card-weekend#28662402
Just because it’s so rich with hypocrisy.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 12, 2010 1:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We gave up 45 to the Falcons though and they didn’t make the playoffs. So it’s certainly possible. On the other side of that, I don’t think the offense would have been equipt enough to throw up 45-50 points.
Tim Tebow = 1,432,219 season tickets next year. Who wouldn't pick him in the 1st round with those projections?
by Drew K on Jan 11, 2010 2:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
DAL, NYJ, and BAL's..
defense played great over the weekend as well, and DAL’s defense really played well late before the playoffs. NYJ and BAL’s defense aren’t what you would call middle of the road defenses. They for one thing play in tougher divisions. I don’t see how one could say the 49ers defense is better on that alone.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 11, 2010 2:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
49ers defensive secondary doesn’t match up against DAL, NYJ, or BAL’s… I agree.
Tim Tebow = 1,432,219 season tickets next year. Who wouldn't pick him in the 1st round with those projections?
by Drew K on Jan 11, 2010 2:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ravens secondary has been their weakness
Niners’ is better than Baltimore. Niners have better Safety play than Dallas but when you incorporate nickel players Dallas may be deeper. Their secondary has the advantage of a more consistent pass rush which can make any secondary look better than it is.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 2:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
DAL Defense (secondary)
Extremely overrated.
They benefit greatly from the play of their front 7 (especially Jay Ratliff and Demarcus Ware).
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by chikmagnet_565 on Jan 11, 2010 3:23 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm glad you too noticed it
I think the Niners would have one member of their secondary in the pro-bowl if they had Ware and Ratliff rushing the QB.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 3:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Serioulsy
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by chikmagnet_565 on Jan 12, 2010 10:30 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I doubt we have better safety play than any of these teams
We pretty much have one safety in Goldson, Lewis gets subbed out for Roman on passing downs, that is not a good set of safeties, period.
Tribute to #44........The Elmira Express
by rlott#42 on Jan 11, 2010 6:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree
The 49ers secondary definitely matches up well when compared to BAL.
They have no good CBs (although L.Webb could be a force next season) and if Ed Reed is out you can almost guarantee that the Ravens secondary will get torched.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by chikmagnet_565 on Jan 11, 2010 3:22 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We are talking about this season and no, the Niners secondary is not close to being mentioned in the same sentence with the Ravens CB’s and Safeties
Tim Tebow = 1,432,219 season tickets next year. Who wouldn't pick him in the 1st round with those projections?
by Drew K on Jan 11, 2010 3:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You're wrong on this one Drew
Obvioulsy a healthy Reed is the best player from either secondary. But the Niners CBs are better than Baltimore’s. Spencer is quite an unappreciated Corner.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 3:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I am definitely not wrong. Our front seven is better than Baltimores which in turn should have increased or helped with the secondaries performance yet they were ranked 8th in the NFL against the pass while we ranked 21st. If anything, you’re wrong on this one Spurred.
I agree that Spencer is underrated but there, like I said before, is no way our secondary is close to being mentioned in the same breath as the Ravens.
Tim Tebow = 1,432,219 season tickets next year. Who wouldn't pick him in the 1st round with those projections?
by Drew K on Jan 11, 2010 4:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You think our front-7 is better?
We disagree there. I wish we had Suggs. Lewis may not be what he was but what brings to a defense and team can’t be quantified.
I’d still take our secondary over Baltimore’s and certainly their front 4 (with Suggs) over ours.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 4:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Suggs is one man
but right now, in ‘09 we have the best LB in the NFL. I would take Willis over Suggs there. And I’ll raise your almost expired Ray Lewis a Justin Smith, Abrayo Franklin, Parys Haralson, Ahmad Brooks, Takeo Spikes, etc. Those guys certainly are not what you would call slouches. Yes, we majorly disagree there.
Tim Tebow = 1,432,219 season tickets next year. Who wouldn't pick him in the 1st round with those projections?
by Drew K on Jan 11, 2010 4:36 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Even if they are even or close to it (front 7’s) I still win with the rankings. There is a huge seperation in pass defense rankings….that’s not even a close race there. I would maybe concede or be willing to if our front seven was no good but that is not reality
Tim Tebow = 1,432,219 season tickets next year. Who wouldn't pick him in the 1st round with those projections?
by Drew K on Jan 11, 2010 4:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I like our front seven. They defend the run quite well. But I don’t think they attack the QB as well as Baltimore’s front seven, and front four specifically. I think the Niners secondary has had more occassions this season where QBs had 4+ seconds to throw and were able to without getting hit. In my mind, that means their secondary has done more with less pressure on the QB. Again, no doubt Reed is the best individual player when healthy. But I’ll take the Niners secondary as a collective.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 4:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Baltimore’s secondary ranked 8th…how can you not acknowledge that? I don’t get it.
Our secondary pretty much lost us 2 or 3 close games that would have landed us in the playoffs. Clearly it is the weakest point of our defense: 21st against the pass. Coverages have been blown all year long. Brooks, Smith, and the other LB’s put the heat on, they may have not had a ton of sacks but they had a bunch of hurries. Also, the Ravens secondary has more tackles and more INT’s than the 49ers. I just don’t know how anyone could try and argue it.
Tim Tebow = 1,432,219 season tickets next year. Who wouldn't pick him in the 1st round with those projections?
by Drew K on Jan 11, 2010 4:59 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That actually supports my point
The Ravens get those stats because they pressure the QB. If the Niners’ secondary got as much consistent pressure on the QB as baltimore does, the Niners secondary would have more INT and give up fewer yardage.
Check out the lack of pressure when playing Atlanta, GB, Philly and Houston. The inability to pressure the QB is why the yardage totals are so high. Well, that and Roman as a nickel safety.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 5:03 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The Niners do get pressure.
Re Atlanta: Ryan was getting the ball out extremely fast. No chance to get him really.
Re GB: For some reason, we sent virtually no blitzes so it was pretty much a 3 man rush for most of the game, which actually supports my point.
Re Philly: That was just a bad game around the board, everyone played horrible.
Re Houston: I am pretty sure that Schuab was getting hit alot in that game. I will have to look in to that statistically.
Tim Tebow = 1,432,219 season tickets next year. Who wouldn't pick him in the 1st round with those projections?
by Drew K on Jan 11, 2010 5:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Baltimore's secondary doesn't see the field as much as the 49ers
You should evaluate both secondaries player by player.
They have nothing there (aside from Reed)
Webb, a rookie, was their best CB and he got injured.
Carr seems to be playing a little bit better, but he was terrible early in the season.
Foxworth is also terrible.
I’d even take Tarrell Brown over any of their current starting CBs…
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by chikmagnet_565 on Jan 12, 2010 10:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Having played both GB and AZ
I feel comfortable saying the Niners D would not have given up 45 to those teams. They gave up 30 in GB on a day they played poorly and had zero support from the offense for an entire half. They gave up 25 combined in two games vs AZ. That GB scored that much on AZ was no surprise. They did it the week before and when the starters were playing in the pre-season. Their offense matches up well with the AZ defense. I was surprised by the GB defense giving up 45 in regulation. Warner was on but he was not pressured.
Even with a loss I would’ve loved the Niners to have been hosting GB in a WC game, just to see how the team responded to a playoff environment.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 3:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Green Bay probably would have said the same thing before the game
They were the 2nd ranked defense in the NFL in yards allowed and 7th in points given up. In other words, they had a top 10 defense during the season. They just completely fell apart on Sunday.
Don't trust this guy. He lies.
by urnext on Jan 11, 2010 3:19 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Rankings
With yesterday providing a reason for hindsight, I now wonder how solid that ranking was. How many good offenses and top QBs did they play this season? I can only think of Favre (2x) and Roth. They lost all three games and gave up over 500 passing yards to Roth. The rest of their schedule doesn’t show many games vs great passing teams.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 3:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
They really were up and down all year
One week they’re getting lit up by Tampa Bay for 38 points, then the next week their shutting down Tony Romo and the Cowboys, allowing only a late TD. I guess it was the former defense that showed up, although they didn’t give up more than 38 in any one game this season. Kurt Warner had one of his best playoff games ever.
Don't trust this guy. He lies.
by urnext on Jan 11, 2010 3:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
they simply got tired of blowing their whistles
by srill waiting on Jan 11, 2010 1:38 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah it was a wild one
& even if there was a facemask call, it likely would have been after the fumble and the Cards would have been at worst inside GB’s 15 YL.
by Mangoman on Jan 11, 2010 1:40 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually...
I doubt they would have actually called that a facemask.
More than likely they would have called it a blow to the head as unless its blatant facemask, its usually that call.
That and the guy swung the arm..
by Owner on Jan 11, 2010 1:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
The facemask at the end of the game was incidental
and there’s no penalty for incidental facemask anymore.
Yes Drew K, Tim Tebow will get picked in the first round.
by smileyman on Jan 11, 2010 1:48 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I'm not so sure
I watched it several times on Tivo and it looked like Adams did pull Rogers head down a little. It wasn’t the worst facemask I’ve ever seen, but you can tell by the picture that he clearly grabbed it. At least with one finger. Still, all that would have done was move the Cardinals back to the 32. The way the Packers defense was playing I’m pretty sure they would have scored anyways.
Don't trust this guy. He lies.
by urnext on Jan 11, 2010 3:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I thought there is no penalty for incidental anymore because they made all facemask plays the same penalty whether incidental or not.
Quit making the theiving Wall Street Fat-Cat Bankers even richer.
moveyourmoney.info
by cybermaldonado on Jan 11, 2010 3:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually, last year they had the lesser penalty yardage for what the rules say is an “accidental” facemask. They remade the rule this year so it’s 15 yards for any facemask, accidental or not.
by Hoopers Judge on Jan 11, 2010 11:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I can’t believe those Packer fans are crying foul on that play. Rodgers lost the ball before the facemask! Whether there was a face mask or not it had no out come on the play. Stupid whining packer fans.
by SuperStarAR on Jan 11, 2010 2:54 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
It would wipe away the TD
The Cardinals would still get the fumble but would be penalized 15 yards from the spot of the foul.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by chikmagnet_565 on Jan 11, 2010 3:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I thought...
That if the facemask pentaly was called while the ball was fumbled it would be given back to the offense since no one had one possession at the time of the penalty. I don’t know if that’s correct but I though the defense had to have already recovered the fumble for it to be remain their ball and the penalty would be post-possession.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 3:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It's called the "clean hands" rule
If the face mask happened before the fumble, Green Bay keeps posetion. If the penalty happened after the fumble, Arizona keeps posetion but is moved back 15 yards from the recovery spot. If you watch the play, Rodgers had already lost posesion when Adams grabbed the facemask.
Don't trust this guy. He lies.
by urnext on Jan 11, 2010 3:33 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Even if the ball is free at the time? I had not heard of that rule by name.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 3:47 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You may be right
I tried to find the exact wording but the NFL rule book is incedibly conviluted. It may very well be that any foul committed before the official change of possession results in the original team, in this case the Packers, keeping the ball.
Don't trust this guy. He lies.
by urnext on Jan 11, 2010 7:58 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If the penalty was called before the recovery Green Bay would of kept the ball. In other words since the penalty happened before anyone recovered the ball Green Bay would of retained possession.
by Hoopers Judge on Jan 11, 2010 11:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
That makes the non-call even worse.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by chikmagnet_565 on Jan 12, 2010 10:35 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Some Play-Off QBs had a really bad day:
Comp_ Att__ Yds__ Pct__ TD__ Int__ Rating
D. McNabb___19__37__ 230___51.4__ 1____ 1___ 68.5
C. Palmer____18__ 36__ 146___ 50.0__ 1____1___ 58.3
J. Flacco_____ 4___10___ 34___ 40.0__ 0___ 1___ 10.0
T. Brady____ _23__ 42__ 154___ 54.8__ 2___ 3___ 49.1
Hill, Smith, or Davis could have done better.
McNabb, you’re too old; bring in the back up.
No it’s you Palmer, you suck; where’s the back up.
Actually, it’s Flacco who sucks; back up, we need you.
Brady, you better retire; we want the back up.
Or are we suppose to save our energy to hate, criticize, denigrate, make fun of, and lash out at Hill and Smith and later Davis, the 49er QBs?
The worst of Hill and Smith combined was at least as good as what these guys did in their Play-off game.
Wonder if we can ever learn to criticize OUR 49ers constructively without the perverse pleasure that comes with expressing our angry, sometimes hateful, displeasure.
by CorneliusJ on Jan 11, 2010 3:21 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
To be fair
McNabb always stinks in the playoffs and has probably blown at least 2 superbowl runs for the Iggles. Guy is seriously the worst QB in history when the playoffs come around. Makes horrible decisions.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jan 11, 2010 3:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I might trade him for Shaun Hill as a backup
But he would probably blow more games than Hill
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jan 11, 2010 3:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He would be better than Smith
Tribute to #44........The Elmira Express
by rlott#42 on Jan 11, 2010 6:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah right
Tribute to #44........The Elmira Express
by rlott#42 on Jan 11, 2010 6:14 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Name a big playoff game that he hasn't choked in?
T.O. carried that team in the superbowl and McNabb choked in that too.
here is a perfect example of Donovan “worst playoff QB in history” McNabb
On the first drive of the game, Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb fumbled while being sacked by New England linebacker Willie McGinest, and the Patriots recovered the ball at Philadelphia’s 34 yard line. Fortunately for the Eagles, coach Andy Reid’s instant replay challenge overruled the fumble; officials ruled that McNabb had been down by contact before the ball came out of his hands. Later in the quarter after each team had punted twice, McNabb completed a 30-yard pass to Terrell Owens, with a roughing the passer penalty adding 9 yards, moving the ball inside the Patriots 20 yard line. However, linebacker Mike Vrabel sacked McNabb for a 16-yard loss on the next play. On the following play, the Eagles once again appeared to turn the ball over: McNabb’s pass was intercepted in the end zone by Patriots defensive back Asante Samuel, but it was nullified by an illegal contact penalty on linebacker Roman Phifer, moving the ball back inside the 20 and giving the Eagles a first down. However, McNabb’s second chance was wasted as he threw an interception to safety Rodney Harrison on the next play.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jan 11, 2010 11:26 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Dude turns the ball over twice on the same drive in the Super Bowl
How is he still the QB in Philly?
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jan 11, 2010 11:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Final statline
McNabb completed 30 out of 51 passes for 357 yards and 3 touchdowns, but threw 3 interceptions and was sacked four times.
When A. Smith has a statline like that he gets crucified. That’s McNabb’s playoff career in a nutshell
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jan 11, 2010 11:30 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I was vastly amused by the Cardinals post game comments, especially the complete lack of acknowledgement that the defense stunk badly.
Remember Wisenhunt fired the defensive coordinator after the Super Bowl last year? Wisenhunt would have taken some major hits if the Cards lost this game.
Quit making the theiving Wall Street Fat-Cat Bankers even richer.
moveyourmoney.info
by cybermaldonado on Jan 11, 2010 3:37 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I did appreciate Dockett's take on it
On the field right after the game. He gave genuine respect to GB for never giving up and coming back. He seemed genuinely relieved to have won and seemed to get how fortunate they were.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 3:41 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Dockett: Future Niner.
Local Phoenix talk radio is saying that he may have earned himself another $5 million on his upcoming FA contract by his great play yesterday.
Quit making the theiving Wall Street Fat-Cat Bankers even richer.
moveyourmoney.info
by cybermaldonado on Jan 11, 2010 6:43 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
And in the SB last season
He comes to play.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
by SpurredOn on Jan 11, 2010 6:48 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I might have that wrong actually. I think they were probably talking about Dansby. I’ll have to go check it.
Quit making the theiving Wall Street Fat-Cat Bankers even richer.
moveyourmoney.info
by cybermaldonado on Jan 11, 2010 6:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Good god, no
I can’t stand him.
He talks way too much smack and isn’t even that good.
Justin Smith is just as good (if not better) and you don’t hear him spewing insults.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by chikmagnet_565 on Jan 12, 2010 10:36 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Fortunate indeed...
that Warner is their QB—for the time being. Once he throws in the towel though, the NFC West is ours for the taking and Arizona knows it.
by Doni S on Jan 12, 2010 2:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
About the Cardinals defense
Green Bay exploited the same three match ups the entire game. They ran the draw with Ryan Grant, dialed up 20+ out patterns on the corners and ran crossing patterns with the TE. A few seam patterns were thrown in but for the most part GB offense found a few plays that worked and kept running them.
In contrast, Arizona ran every GB defender over with a snowplow. They exploited every segment of the field, with every type of play imaginable except for runs up the middle. How GB defense ever played so well to rank so high is mind boggling. The entire defense was a weakness yesterday. Charles Woodson doesn’t deserve any kind of reward.
by bignerd on Jan 11, 2010 4:34 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
AZ was unstoppable yesterday..
But turnovers helped too. Warner was 29 for 33 with 5 tds and one sack. That’s insane.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 11, 2010 4:39 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know why the 49ers play the Cardinals better than the rest of the league. The 49ers plan is to get a pass rush from the edge than drop everyone else in coverage. It works despite the 49ers not having good pass rushers.
by bignerd on Jan 11, 2010 4:42 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I can't understand..
how AZ plays mediocre football in the regular season (they crapped the bed against CAR), but suddenly get dangerous in the post-season under Warner. To me, it’s the coaching. AZ makes a lot of stupid mistakes that cost them (like in the first game against SF) and don’t have much discipline as a whole. I still think Whiz is overrated. That team should have at least 12 wins this season, but it isn’t about the talent level and such. Warner was a bit dinged up late, but maybe he is feeling healthier now. But he was nails yesterday. That’s the whole key. The 49ers get to Warner, but the first game he wasn’t 100%, and the last game he wasn’t either.
Well, we're waiting....
by drummer on Jan 11, 2010 4:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Haha
Did anybody else see the ref fall back in ovrtime wen rodgers threw it deep
49ers are the best there was the best there is and the best there ever will be
by swagger on Jan 11, 2010 4:54 PM PST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
i was seriously laughing for a couple of minutes
Go 49ers
by iaalexeeff on Jan 11, 2010 8:28 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
lol yeah that was pretty funny
"The Football The 49ers Team has The excitement of the bear, the velocity of the deer and strenght of the buffalo.
by 49erLou on Jan 11, 2010 8:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't want to be the ref in the middle of the field
most dangerous position to play since you’re completely unprotected (unless you’re Ed Hochuli). I think it makes perfect sense for them to get helmets like I’ve seen a couple of proposals for.
I would love it if they put cameras on the refs helmets and let users switch to them in game. How cool would that be?
Yes Drew K, Tim Tebow will get picked in the first round.
by smileyman on Jan 11, 2010 9:21 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Ed Hochuli wears his mansuit armor
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jan 11, 2010 11:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Haha that be pretty cool.
49ers are the best there was the best there is and the best there ever will be
by swagger on Jan 11, 2010 9:55 PM PST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Alex Smiths pocket time.
Its amazing how much time tom brady has to throw with his OL, if Alex had that time he could do many things with are offence.
I believe he is better then what we have seen.
by Stupifyed on Jan 12, 2010 2:49 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 



















