49ers Biggest Free Agent Disappointments of the Decade
And here's Ninjames, supporting you with offseason goodness (well considering the topicality it may not be good per se, but we'll get through this together) while there's not a whole lot of news to tide you over. A couple weeks ago Fooch posted the 49ers biggest draft disappointments and best draft choices of the decade so I'm checking in to handle the free agent articles for the decade. Check back on Thursday for my look at the best free agent signings, and I'll try hard not to play favorites.
Now, I'm sure I've likely missed a couple hilariously bad players that the 49ers picked up for a game or two in 2000 or 2001 that I couldn't find enough enough information on but I did give it as comprehensive of a list as I could. Now, the team has obviously signed a large amount of free agents and I'm sure you won't always agree with what I've put down but I think for the most part some of these are pretty obvious. I'll start off with an honorable mention.
Honorable Mention
CB Nate Clements 2007 I wasn't sure exactly where I should put Nate Clements in this piece. He obviously has not been a terrible player, he certainly is nowhere near "bust" category but has he been a disappointment? I think he could be considered as such. The team is decidedly better in some areas when he's out there but at times, they seem decidedly worse. On March 2, 2007, Clements became the highest paid defensive player in NFL history with an $80 million contract with 22 million guaranteed over eight years. He's a player who gets burned a lot in coverage and who would probably be better off playing safety. While he hasn't been "bad" he's not worth top CB money because he just.. isn't a top CB.
OT Jonas Jennings 2005 I am hesitant to place people on this list due to injury issues, but I suppose that would still make them a disappointment, wouldn't it? Jonas Jennings was brought in as a big, dominating guy that could run block as well as be serviceable in protecting rookie quarterback Alex Smith's blindside. Jennings was hurt every year he played for the 49ers--when he did play he was decent, but the injuries were just too much. In his first season he started three games before being put on IR. His second season was productive, but he missed the final three games, again on IR. His next two seasons he had other issues and again was IR'd in both seasons. When I think of him, it leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
Continue past the jump for the worst. I'm going all-out here, no more honorable mention--I wish everyone after this jump never made the team in the first place.
I'm not going to number these as it's hard to rank. Actually, I'll number the worst, just for you guys, because I know it to be true and I know all of you will know it to be true, so lets take a look at some of these guys..
LB Tully Banta-Cain 2007 Here's a guy who maybe you didn't know much about when he came in. The point is, though, is that he came from the super bowl winning Patriots, bringing two rings and an abundance of pass-rushing skill with him. He wasn't supposed to be the "fix-all" solution but he was at least supposed to make some kind of impact. He started 10 games and recorded 41 tackles with 3.5 sacks, a decent year. The following year, he started no games and finished with half a sack before departing back to the Patriots... where he's been playing great. Yay.
WR Ashley Lelie 2007 Just defines mediocre. The guy was drafted in the first rounds and had himself a couple of pretty good seasons with the Broncos before having a down year in Atlanta. Coming into San Francisco, he was still supposed to have a lot left in the tank and could fix the 49ers woes at wide receiver. Keep in mind, the current lineup of receiving threats for the Niners is the best we've seen since Rice+Owens, and at the time Lelie was supposed to be a pretty big hope. He finished the season with 10 catches for 115 yards. Just terrible. Still, I suppose if he was good we maybe wouldn't have picked up Crabtree.. who knows?
WR Antonio Bryant 2006 What a signing. Bryant is a really good player, that's for sure, but when he came to the Niners he had a lot of extra baggage. The team desperately needed help at wide receiver, and Mike Nolan decided that the risk was worth the reward, that the other issues wouldn't hinder his ability to play... wrong. Bryant had numerous issues with coach Nolan as well as plenty of other such things. He played well when he was here, amassing over 700 yards and being a legitimate receiving threat, but he finished the '06 season on a league imposed suspension and was cut in the offseason.
S Mark Roman 2006 Is it a bit unfair of me to include Mark Roman on this list? Probably--he's been decent over the years, but I cannot tell you just how many times his coverage "skills" have cost the 49ers a game. Maybe the team shouldn't have been in a position where Mark Roman could lose the game for us but I don't care, I'll be as unreasonable as I want because of all the times I've literally sat and watched the blown coverage lose a game. Too many times at the start of the play I've said "Roman isn't going to stop this, look, I hope they don't throw right th-- GOD [site decorum] [site decorum] [site decorum] MARK ROMAN!!"
He's had his high points. He's made some plays, and he's a good veteran presence on the field, that much is to be sure. I hear the coaching staff talk about how smart he is (then why is he out of position so often?) and I understand he was good with the green dot for awhile as well as a nice veteran presence in the locker room. Still, I cannot say I've been glad that Roman has been a part of this team, as mean as that sounds. He seems like a really cool guy, from the specials on the website, I could see myself chilling with him and listening to good music (his tastes are superb) but other than that, Roman needs to be gone next season... or at least not playing at all.
NUMBER ONE J.T. O'Sullivan 2008 Now... was there any doubt in your minds? After the 49ers hired offensive coordinator Mike Martz they signed J.T. O'Sullivan to a one year deal. Martz being Martz, O'Sullivan quickly became the front runner in the quarterback "competition." The competition itself was highly publicized and many people believe it wasn't an even split. So after a long, drawn out couple of weeks Mike Nolan pretty much caved in to Martz and O'Sullivan was the starter.
What a first-half of the season that was. By the time J.T. O'Sullivan was benched by Mike Singletary (after coach Nolan was fired mid-season) he was leading the league in both interceptions thrown and fumbles. He may also have lead the league in fumbles lost, but I can't be sure. He was cocky, abrasive and terrible. He had all the making of a potentially good QB--it's one of the reasons I actually supported and defended him from the beginning. Yeah, you read that right. I thought O'Sullivan could be the answer, and almost spent a whole lot of money on a jersey. He became the face of the 49ers franchise for about oh.. nine weeks or so. What a horrible, horrible face. I've seen better faces... uh... on the Oakland Raiders, or something.
Looking back the 49ers had a slew of free agent disappointments in the years just before the turn of the last decade. 1998, 1999 and so on had some pretty big names that might drive us 49ers fans crazy. Fortunately this past decade hasn't been too rough on us, now if only we didn't have such horrible draft busts we'd be in pretty good shape. Again, I'm sure I missed some people, but ya know.
67 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Clements
I agree with your assessment with Clements. You can’t blame the guy for being overpaid because the team did sign that contract. He’s been a disappointment in coverage, but I’ve been very impressed with his ability to protect the run.
Randy Hahn: "I’ve been referred to as a playa…"
Totally disagree about Clements
1. He isn’t overpaid
2. He had a top 10 year in 2007. Was on pace for another top 10-15 year this year before he got hurt.
Yes Drew K, Tim Tebow will get picked in the first round.
He wasn't benched
He was named the 3rd DB against the Colts and I think it was simply because of the scheme we were running against them.
Yes Drew K, Tim Tebow will get picked in the first round.
He was NOT on pace for a top ten-fifteen year this year.
I chose water over wine... Jars of formaldehyde... think of all the things I missed... Why'd you make me a scientist?
by James Brady on Jan 27, 2010 12:42 PM PST up reply actions
Seriously
200 something yards to Roddy White.
WTF?
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Jan 27, 2010 7:16 PM PST up reply actions
Stats
Clements had 30 tackles in 6 games. Average of 5 per game which would give him 80 for a full season.
Jacob Lacey—85 tackles
Terrell Thomas—85
Nick Harper—81
William Gay—78
Cedric Griffin—75
Those are the top 5 CBs in tackles.
1 INT in 6 games. Would’ve been on pace for 3 on the season, which is not top 15. However Nate has never really been a big INT guy.
Nate had 7 PD in 6 games which would be 19 over a full season. To make the top 15 list all he needed was 20 PD.
ProFootballFocus keeps track of passes thrown at a player and how many are completed. Clements had a completion rate of 56.4% That puts him in the top 15.
His biggest problem is that when players catch it against him they do it for an average of 15 yards per catch, which just kills us.
Yes Drew K, Tim Tebow will get picked in the first round.
Yeah, those are the top five CBs in tackles..
They’re all mediocre. Cool, what are you proving with that?
As far as the INTs go, not top 15. “Not a big INT guy” doesn’t exclude him from from being a bad CB. That’s like saying Mark Roman wasn’t a bad safety because he “wasn’t a big angles and coverage guy.”
Not top fifteen in passes defended, next.
And your last thing you kind of explained out yourself, didn’t you?
Exactly. He wasn’t on pace for a top 15 season, and it likely wasn’t even a top 20 season.
I chose water over wine... Jars of formaldehyde... think of all the things I missed... Why'd you make me a scientist?
by James Brady on Jan 27, 2010 11:47 PM PST up reply actions
OK, so how do you judge a top 15 CB?
He would’ve been top 15 in tackles, almost top 15 in PD, top 15 in completion percentage.
Only category he wouldn’t have been top 15 in is INTs.
How else can you look at a DB? Let’s look at his yards per catch. He gave up 192 yards on 22 catches, which at first blush looks really, really bad. It’s an average of 15.9 yards per catch which puts him near the bottom.
However.
He blew one coverage that resulted in a 90 yard TD run. Take that way and you’re looking at 21 catchs for 102 yards or 4.85 yards per catch which is better than any other CB in the NFL.
Yes Drew K, Tim Tebow will get picked in the first round.
And that was in the Atlanta game where the entire defense stunk to high heaven.
Yes Drew K, Tim Tebow will get picked in the first round.
Extrapolating?
Where is that picture?
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Jan 28, 2010 10:22 AM PST up reply actions
He was very good in 2008 even. He was very very hard to defend last year, though. He was pretty bad.
The contract is overblown, though. Without all of the incentives that he’s not going to reach, it’s just not as big a price as the media would have you believe.
I don't know about that, to the groin.
by howtheyscored on Jan 27, 2010 12:55 PM PST up reply actions
JTO
I don’t really think you can call JTO a disappointment given that when he signed there really were no expectations for him. Once he was moved into the starting lineup I suppose expectations went up, but all that much?
I think there were expectations
But they didn’t truly come about until the preseason started and he was named starting QB.
He instantly became the face of the franchise.
Jerseys sold like hot cakes.
I chose water over wine... Jars of formaldehyde... think of all the things I missed... Why'd you make me a scientist?
by James Brady on Jan 27, 2010 12:43 PM PST up reply actions
It’s my understanding that hotcakes aren’t really very popular these days.
I don't know about that, to the groin.
by howtheyscored on Jan 27, 2010 12:56 PM PST up reply actions
leggo-my-eggo
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Jan 27, 2010 7:18 PM PST up reply actions
I didn't even know what hot cakes were
It took me years to realize that it was the same thing as pancakes.
I’m still not 100% sure though.
Why give the same thing two names?
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Jan 27, 2010 7:18 PM PST up reply actions
I think...
… it’s a geography thing. Different parts of the country call them different things. I could be wrong, though.
Not sure.
I live in SoCal and some people call them pancakes others hotcakes.
The old people say “hotcakes” more though.
Perhaps it’s an age thing?
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Jan 28, 2010 10:24 AM PST up reply actions
really?
I don’t remember him being the face of the franchise last year at any point. People more made fun of him than anything else.
by David Fucillo on Jan 27, 2010 2:23 PM PST up reply actions
I guess, but his jersey was front page stuff on the website..
From a ‘casual’ standpoint, everyone bought those jerseys. Most of us knew better.
I chose water over wine... Jars of formaldehyde... think of all the things I missed... Why'd you make me a scientist?
wow
I didn’t know of a single person who bought his jersey. Of course, after buying an Alex Smith jersey 4 years ago I decided to never buy a QB jersey again, unless the player was already retired.
by David Fucillo on Jan 27, 2010 3:49 PM PST up reply actions
You should go to a game sometime.
You’ll see plenty.
I chose water over wine... Jars of formaldehyde... think of all the things I missed... Why'd you make me a scientist?
Every Jersey I buy curses the player
But I really really wnat to buy a patrick willis jersey…. I dont know what to do.
Me too
I bought a Julian Petersen jersey years ago when he signed – look what happened to him!
by Ninerfromacrossthepond on Jan 28, 2010 8:01 AM PST up reply actions
I saw A LOT of JTO jerseys
And I live in Southern California!
After the DET game everyone was calling him the Savior.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Jan 27, 2010 7:19 PM PST up reply actions
Yeah, I think the problem with JTO wasn't the signing, it was the actually playing of him on the field
I guess it depends how you want to judge these things, obviously, but I’d say he was a fine, if inconsequential pick up as a FA, if all he’d done was be a back up QB all season.
The problem was in team selection, not squad building
I suspect that you think tilting at windmills means something other than what it does.
A great preseason QB
It’s got to be the reason why teams keep signing JTO and why he’s like the poster boy for NFL journeymen. He seems to have an ability to win over the best OC’s (Martz) and then the regular season comes and all hell breaks loose (see CIN-NYJ game). If we had a preseason Pro Bowl, he and Thomas Clayton would make it every year.
what about Marvel Smith?
or would he not count since he didn’t even get in a game as a 49er
"The Football The 49ers Team has The excitement of the bear, the velocity of the deer and strenght of the buffalo.
I think
that low cost/low expectation guys like JTO can’t really be considered busts because no one ever thought they would be good in the first place. But Jonas Jennings was paid alot of money to anchor the O-Line and couldnt stay healthy enough to do it. Had they signed a different guy that was able to do what Jennings was supposed to do, the entire make up of the O-Line and team may have been different
I don't know about everyone else...
… but this list seems more like a “free agent acquisitions I now hate” post than “free agent acquisitions that let me down” (which is what I interpret “disappointment” to be).
No, Mark Roman is the only one who fits that category.
I love me some Nate Clements.
I chose water over wine... Jars of formaldehyde... think of all the things I missed... Why'd you make me a scientist?
by James Brady on Jan 27, 2010 12:43 PM PST up reply actions
Maybe hate was the wrong word...
… but I probably would have classified Jonas Jennings to be a bigger disappointment than guys like Roman, Lelie, and O’Sullivan. He was actually paid money to be an anchor, and was far from it. As you alluded to, the injuries can definitely still make him a disappointment.
agree
Jonas Jennings was definitely a huge disappointment given the contract he got.
by David Fucillo on Jan 27, 2010 2:24 PM PST up reply actions
I guess I didn't pay enough attention to the whole Jennings thing.
I chose water over wine... Jars of formaldehyde... think of all the things I missed... Why'd you make me a scientist?
WR
Yeah, the biggest disappointments this decade had to be all of the WR signings the 49ers made. We’ve been spoiled with the likes of Rice/TO and a few other great receivers, it was just too much expectation to begin with when we brought in guys like Ashley Lelie and Antonio Bryant…but I guess QB play and OL problems throughout the decade probably impacted these WR’s games…But yeah, naturally all of the WRs would appear less than stellar (and a huge disappointment) compared to Rice/TO.
Clements is awesome but does he deserve top CB money?…Eh…
for me
it would have to be clements, jennings and then banta-cain just because i actually expected them to produce very well and they didnt.
while clements wasnt terrible he certainly didnt play up to his potential or the size of his deal.
jennings was frustration because he just couldnt stay healthy
banta-cain just couldnt do much here for some reason because as soon as he went back to new england he put up 9.5 sacks
im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!
by remembering9ergods on Jan 27, 2010 1:27 PM PST reply actions
Banta-Cain irony
You would think he would have flourished in this neck of the woods. Didn’t he go to Cal?
Roman
So what does he listen to that makes his taste so great? I’ve always disliked the usual playlists that atheletes listen to.
Hockey Players… their musical tastes are hilarious. It’s pretty standard…80’s metal. Perfect for the mullets.
Lots of good stuff.
Mostly Michael Jackson and a few others. He likes a lot of good rappers, some very good progressive rock groups and even a few pop artists I’m not ashamed to admit I like.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Since U Been Gone or don’t holla.
I chose water over wine... Jars of formaldehyde... think of all the things I missed... Why'd you make me a scientist?
why would you be ashamed to admit you like any pop artist?
If you like something, why not be happy with it? It doesn’t make you a child molester, or anything
I suspect that you think tilting at windmills means something other than what it does.
Jesus Christ man it was a joke.
NOT ASHAMED is what I said. I love pop, I love rap, I love rock and I love me some electronica. I mean, I’m basically an owner of a music based magazine. Music is my life.
I chose water over wine... Jars of formaldehyde... think of all the things I missed... Why'd you make me a scientist?
I thought the golden nuggets were your life....
You have let me down James.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Jan 27, 2010 7:22 PM PST up reply actions
music is oxygen
Football is a playground. The Golden Nuggets are home.
I chose water over wine... Jars of formaldehyde... think of all the things I missed... Why'd you make me a scientist?
pop shame
I had some thoughts about this earlier today… Pop is kind of a dirty word because musicians all strive to have that perfect piece, perfect album. But pop carries a conotation of single, or collection of singles that just works. I imagine that Pink Floyd (for example) worked laboriously over each note as it pertained to the whole album while making The Wall. While someone like Michael Jackson might really strive to make each note work within the parameters of the song.
Both are great. I can bust out some pop and love the songs and be moved. I might listen to the whole album on repeat for a few days and toss it for a while. But with a masterfully done album, I could spin it over and over again, but only if I listen to the whole thing. It’s harder to tire from that because it lends itself to less repetition.
Pop is kind of like the girl that you date and show off to your friends because she looks good. You’ll find another girl like her and you’ll flaunt her too.
While a great album is like a girl that might not look so awesome, but she cooks and is smart and has a job and… you get the point. So you stay loyal to her.
so, there’s no shame to pop. just comes down to what you’re more proud of.
Proud of all my music..
My top artists and songs are a matter of public record. :]
I chose water over wine... Jars of formaldehyde... think of all the things I missed... Why'd you make me a scientist?
Thoughts and disagreements
TBC was an example where the disappoint was in the coaching staff rather than the player. He was on his way up when he left NE and resumed where he left off when he returned. Manusky did not know how to use him right. But these things happen. Sometimes players and coaches do not have the chemistry to make things work.
Usually, you can tell if the disappoint is on the coaching end or the player end. In the case of TBC, it was the coaches who were the disappointment. In the case of Ashley Lelie, it was him. Lelie was on his way down before joining the Niners and did not turn things around. After he left…. does he still play?
I was wondering why Bryant was on the list until I read the disappointment was in his attitude rather than his talent and I proceeded to call off the dogs. Him making the list makes sense in that way.
Roman…. I only go by what I hear. I got to admit. I don’t focus on how well a safety plays. I’m more of a trenches guy. I never have a solid opinion on safeties.
JTO, like TBC, was the problem of the coaches. Unlike TBC, JTO was never on his way up or was good after he left. Also unlike TBC, nobody has any expectations from JTO when we picked him up. How this was a disappointment on the coaching side was that they put a guy that should’ve been 3rd string into the starting position. JTO should have never been placed into a position that would have him make this list. JTO was a big reason why I was glad to see Martz gone.
Alot of you just dont show Nate enough love or respect.
The guy is not even close to a bad signing for the NIners. Incase you’ve forgotten hes been the #1 CB since he came and has been one of the few solid bright spots on this defense. His presence on run defense alone grants him much due respect, and not to mention the fact that him being on that side of the field has overshadowed M. Lewis’s average coverage skills and not so stellar speed. Ever notice how alot of the Big runs against the Niners the past few years are to the left?
Hes done better against Fitz then ANY other corner in the league. Sure hes not a true lockdown corner and does get beat, but did anyone else notice how much crappier the Pass D looked when he got hurt and it was just Spencer and Brown out there? Spencer is good at shutting down #2 recievers but he wasnt so stellar at the #1 spot.
And he wasnt benched for the Colts game. He just wasnt fast enough to keep up with Reggie Wayne and all the speed routes the Colts run. He was put in the NIckel spot to be closer to the run and to watch the middle of the field where his experience and zone coverage would help on the inside of the field, where as his lack of top end speed would hurt on the outside. Its called STRATEGY.
Alot of you guys are too quick to jump the gun on ANYTHING. Ever since he had that ONE poor preseason game this year ive noticed people keeping him on the radar just looking for excuses to knock on this guy. Seriously, where the hell have you guys been the past 3 years? A bad signing?? Please. Sometimes i think some of you dont even watch the games and just go along with what other people are saying on these boards.
Oh, but i will agree his contract is a bit steep.
The guys is certainly not unbeatable. But he hasnt exactly had a great secondary to help him out since coming here either.
contract
People get pissy over the contract, but a lot times people forget about the voidable chunks of it. It’s still a hefty deal but not anywhere near as bad as it seems.
by David Fucillo on Jan 27, 2010 3:50 PM PST up reply actions
I guess people disagree with me.
Oh well. I feel like I’ve got a limb missing since my laptop went down. This article was about 2 x the length of this, but I had to start and finish it again in about 12 hours or so while having other things to do.
Just sayin’. For the record I love me some Nate. Clements has been one my favorite players.
I chose water over wine... Jars of formaldehyde... think of all the things I missed... Why'd you make me a scientist?
Good Post
Even before Fooch allowed you to do the daily Nuggetts you use to post really well. Keep things like these coming. Fooch is somewhere upset that you stole his idea on an offseason thread
He knew I was posting it. aha.
But I like your idea better.
I chose water over wine... Jars of formaldehyde... think of all the things I missed... Why'd you make me a scientist?
rofl
I chose water over wine... Jars of formaldehyde... think of all the things I missed... Why'd you make me a scientist?
by James Brady on Jan 27, 2010 11:47 PM PST up reply actions
how about jones?
Of the players listed i’d have to say jonas jennings was the worst, but how could brandon jones not be on this list? five years for a #4 receiver strikes me as retarded…

by 


























