49ers vs. Cardinals Injury Report: Mike Johnson on Nate Davis
The 49ers and Cardinals released their Thursday injury reports and the only change was the inclusion of Justin Smith, who sat out practice with an illness. Other than that everything is as expected heading into the holiday weekend.
With the Thursday injury report comes the offensive coordinator and defensive coordinator transcripts. Mike Johnson and Greg Manusky spoke with the press and had plenty of questions about the potential coaching changes and dealing with the team in a game that has no playoff implications. It's a good deal of coach speak, but there were a few comments worth noting.
Mike Johnson was asked about Nate Davis and the possibility of adding him to the roster:
On whether there was any consideration of bringing QB Nate Davis up to the active roster for this game:
"The only discussion head coach [Jim] Tomsula and I had was who was going to be the starting quarterback, and [QB] Alex Smith is the starting quarterback. That's the only thing we talked about and that's what we came up with."
On what your stance was regarding Nate Davis' preparation and work ethic in the offseason:
"That is something that I don't want to get into at this point. If you ask me this question on Monday, I will give you a different answer, but today my focus is on Arizona, it's on Alex Smith being the starting quarterback and putting the game plan together for this week."
That second question and answer is the much more interesting of the two. He says he'd have something to say if asked Monday, so as the season wraps up we'll keep an eye out for more specific comments on Davis. Of course, seeing as Mike Johnson (and maybe even Davis) might not be around next year, who knows if it will really matter in the end.
Thursday Practice Participation Report
49ers
Out (Definitely Will Not Play)
CB Phillip Adams (ankle)
LB Keaton Kristick (concussion)
T Joe Staley (fibula)
LB Patrick Willis (hand)
Did Not Participate In Practice
RB Brian Westbrook (not injury related)
TE Nate Byham (heel)
DE Justin Smith (illness)
Limited Participation In Practice
C David Baas (ribs)
RB Anthony Dixon (ankle)
LB Takeo Spikes (hand)
Full Participation In Practice
TE Vernon Davis (thumb)
Cardinals
Did Not Participate In Practice
LB Joey Porter (tricep)
Limited Participation In Practice
LB Clark Haggans (groin)
TE Ben Patrick (hamstring)
RB LaRod Stephens-Howling (hamstring)
Offensive Coordinator Mike Johnson
Post - Walk-Thru - December 30, 2010
San Francisco 49ers
Listen to Audio I Media Center
On whether it is difficult no matter what the situation to call the plays on your own:
"Well it's a difficult situation, but it's another game. It's the last game unfortunately, but it's another game and that's how we're going to approach it."
On how important is it to reflect that attitude to the players and reminding them that there is still a game to be played:
"Well that's our business. We are professional football players and we are professional football coaches, and whenever we step out on that field, it's our job to go out and give 100% at whatever we do. That's how we are approaching it as a coaching staff and that's how we're approaching it as a team."
On whether you have seen that professionalism in meetings this week:
"Yes, we've been approaching it with good energy. We have tried to keep it positive, as positive as you can keep it, and we are going to approach this game the same way that we approach every game."
On whether there was any consideration of bringing QB Nate Davis up to the active roster for this game:
"The only discussion head coach [Jim] Tomsula and I had was who was going to be the starting quarterback, and [QB] Alex Smith is the starting quarterback. That's the only thing we talked about and that's what we came up with."
On what your stance was regarding Nate Davis' preparation and work ethic in the offseason:
"That is something that I don't want to get into at this point. If you ask me this question on Monday, I will give you a different answer, but today my focus is on Arizona, it's on Alex Smith being the starting quarterback and putting the game plan together for this week."
On how much conversation you have had with Jim Tomsula about what the offense will look like for the final game this week:
"Our main goal is to win the game. We've talked about how we are going to approach the game and how we're going to handle certain situations and things we're going to do in certain situations. You're not going to be able to make a bunch of wholesale changes in one week, but the goal is to go out and win the game and that's the most important thing."
On whether there is any thought on playing some younger guys or is it just going to be a carry-over from last game:
"We're going to approach the game and play the players with the best chance to win, and that's how we're looking at it. We're not going to go in there and play players at the expense of winning a football game. We're going to go in there with the approach of playing the best possible players that give us that best possible chance."
Defensive Coordinator Greg Manusky
Post Walk-Thru - December 30, 2010
San Francisco 49ers
Listen to Audio I Media Center
On DT Justin Smith being named to the Pro Bowl:
"I think, number one, a great guy. Number two, a great teammate and just a great guy to be around. Spent a lot of time studying his position, understands the game, hard working guy, lunch pail guy, really excited for him and happy for him. He had a good year. Even though he doesn't have the greatest numbers, but he's just a hard working football player that has success, which I'm happy for. Just a great guy."
On LB NaVorro Bowman filling in for LB Patrick Willis:
"I think it's going to be a little bit different of course. Patrick's a Pro Bowl player and for him being selected as well, I think it's great for him. It's a little bit of an adjustment, especially for this guy. I think it's good for him for getting some reps. He can feel it out and get in the game and go out there and perform and he's excited about it as well."
On getting Bowman to focus on LB Takeo Spikes' position more than Willis' early on:
"With young guys, that's what the concern was going in, just for him to study that position more than anything and once the season progressed and [LB] Scotty McKillop kind of got banged up and got hurt, I went to Bo and I said, ‘Hey bro, you've got to make sure you know both. You've just got to pay attention.' With most linebackers, you want them to understand both of them, but it is a little bit of a different position for both guys. He took the challenge and he understands it. I think he'll be fine with it."
On the difference between the two linebacker positions:
"The TED linebacker is inside and he's over the bubble, which is more fullback leads and things of that nature. Where Patrick's a little more covered up because he has a three-technique in front of him and there's not a guard screaming up on him. I think basically in Lehman's terms, one's a bigger framed guy and the other one's a little smaller, quicker framed because of the blocks that he gets in front of him. And from a coverage perspective, usually the MIKE linebacker is the guy that usually is the cover guy more than the TED position."
On LB Takeo Spikes earning the Len Esmont Award:
"TK is a great guy to be around. I wish I had him when he was a young buck as well. Understands the game, plays his butt off, practices his butt off and he's that type of guy. I was happy that he received a couple of awards and I wish he could have gone to the Pro Bowl too with those other guys. But there are a lot of other guys that are deserving as well in the National Football League."
On being an assistant coach and knowing a new head coach is coming in:
"I've got a job, they told me to coach 16-plus games. That's all I do. I go in and I'm just a guy that goes in there and works as hard as I can for every game plan that we have. Have the players, put them in positions to make plays and that's what I'm doing. The futures going to come, it is what it is. Across the board, that's always been my saying and whatever happens, happens. I can't control that. All I can control is what happens Sunday."
On possibly only being in one place for two or three years coaching:
"That's the way the National Football League is. From a coaches perspective, that's the way it is. My family understands that, across the board, from my brothers to my kids to my wife. That's the way it is in this league."
On how he would describe head coach Jim Tomsula as a coach:
"Great coach. He understands systems, he understands game planning, he understands defensive line. A great guy to be around, I'm excited for him. He set a little bit different presence and tempo and stuff during the practice yesterday. But I'm excited for him, a very good guy, a personal friend of mine. I've been working with him for four years. Just an all-around great guy."
On him being friendly and if that is his personality:
"Yeah, that's the way Jimmy is. He's a friendly guy. He's from Pittsburgh; it's on the bad side of the state though. You'd rather be on the other side of the state. I always bust him about that. He's a Pitt guy."
On whether it's looser with him:
"I think so. I think your team sometimes resembles a head coach and he's little bit looser than Mike [Singletary] was. But Jimmy's just a Pittsburgh guy."
On Bowman's playing time falling off late in the season:
"I think he's got to continue to work. He's playing a different position, but he has played a little bit during practice and played a little bit during training camp. With his time during the season, TK was just having a heck of a year. Playing the snaps that TK did, we were still in the hunt until last week and going into this game. Takeo was playing great, he was playing a great season along with Pat. Just finish up the season with this last one."
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If he was inelgible, why not say so?
Can a PS guy play the last Sunday if activated?
ST is going to mean as much
as the front line on either of the other two "teams
by ChesapeakeBay9er on Dec 31, 2010 10:56 AM PST up reply actions
Harbaugh
I just wanted to give you a Ravens fan perspective on the Harbaughs:
1) The family is very close and they all act similarly, so don’t be surprised if your Harbaugh acts a lot like ours.
2) Harbaugh is described as having a “Buzz Lightyear” leadership model by our local press. I’d say that captures it. He believes in being upbeat and by the book. He is an organization man, not a maverick. He believes in good manners, hard work, and sacrifice.
3) He is not an Xs and Os genius. He largely leaves it to his coordinators. He focuses on building the organization the way he wants and letting everyone else do their job. This can work very well in that he is no overbearing for fucks things up. However, he didn’t add any special flavor or expertise to our team (outside of ST). And if a coordinator isn’t doing his job it will take a long time for him to get overruled or shown the door.
4) He will never lose his cool like Singletary. He is very corporate and positive. He is a harsh disciplinarian but always in private. Some say he doesn’t get along with players, but he did cut down on penalties and discipline problems at the Ravens.
5) He never passes to blame to anyone but himself.
6) He is about average at coach game decisions (challenges, clock management).
I want to know your opinion on Cam Cameron
IMO, he’s been killing the Raven’s for two years. When is he gonna realize Joe Flacco isn’t Dan Marino and use the rest of his offense to full potential? Ray Rice, Anquan Boldin and Derrick Mason and he dials up the deep bomb for quarters at a time like the only play in his playbook.
Digital Garbage
cam is fine
our offensive woes this year have to do with losing an offensive tackle and not replacing him
I personally think Jim is a better X/Os guy than John
Jim has his own offensive philosophy.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"
by SportsChicken on Dec 31, 2010 12:35 AM PST up reply actions
I don't know about that
Jim runs a very basic system at Standford. The players are smart and physical and fundamentally sound, which is why they are having the success. I tend to agree with davver, I think Jim works in a very similar way as his brother and I honestly don’t think he would improve the 49ers.
Hey everyone kisten to Steve Young
I just heard this from this site http://www.knbr.com/OnKNBR680/RazorandMrT/tabid/595/Default.aspx, he says the things should be done with this team.
by Lyken84 on Dec 30, 2010 10:01 PM PST reply actions 3 recs
+1
Great listen. He is truly a fan of the team. He really wants us to succeed. Don’t blame the guy for not wanting to be a coach or GM. I wouldn’t want that job either. But at least listen to him. He knows what’s broken. He knows what needs to be fixed.
WOW
Love Steve’s insight on the identity of a football team. So smart.
by Giants49war on Dec 30, 2010 11:50 PM PST up reply actions
I listened to that earlier
I agree with him completely and it’s the reason I am also not to optimistic about what is to come with this team. Like he said, they no longer have an identity. They are back like these other teams that have been lost for years searching for an identity and what it takes to win. Who knows when we will be able to get there again. They Yorks suck and lack respect and I have no confidence they will get the right people in there to turn this team around. We are back on the verge of square one of rebuilding a football team again. I don’t know how much more of this I can take.
steve young
listened to it! loved steve young and i still love you steve young. Can we make Jed listed to him please!!!
Yeah Steve Young!
Harbaugh sounds good to me. We need that kind of leadership. Steve Young for QB Coach!
Jay Cruise
Holistic Healing Mind Body Spirit Arthritis Relief
Nate Davis
not on “that” bandwagon. but why not give him a shot in this meaningless game. well i take that back. this game does have meaning if you consider draft position. lol
There was report that Mike Johnson wasn’t happy with the Nate Davis PS demotion but had no control over it. Curious to see what he says Monday after collecting his last paycheck.
Digital Garbage
You don't think he'll be back?
I always thought he was a good assistant.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"
by SportsChicken on Dec 31, 2010 12:36 AM PST up reply actions
nata davis's career
was doomed the minute singletary refused to bring in competition for alexis, and then nate has the audasity to show grit, arm strength and a set of balls that made coach turn green with envy! how dare he or troy try to pass the ball more than ten yards downfield!!! that wasn’t in our offense, and i think we’re all going to see different sides of our oc/dc now that the stranglehold is gone. the only thing that won’t be different will be alexis’s inability to read defenses, or throw to wide open receivers with any velocity or accuracy!!
So...
would you say that you want Nate Davis playing tomorow (sunday)? You didn’t put out your points as far as Davis so much as you put your points against Alex. I’d actually like to play him (Nate) for two reasons. 1) he’s going to be playing agains Skelton (a late round pick that shows some promise) and Skelton has had less time in the organization than Nate Davis ..ie less time to read the playbook. I’d like to see them going head to head. Then a reasonably honest assessment can be made on Nate. Nate has had more time in the organization than two of the other 3 QBs. He’s had the playbook. for a longer time than either Troy or Carr. Go ahead and play him, if he can’t come in and play then he’s not done the requisite work that needs to be done. No excuses, this is his time to shine and to show that he can do something. It’s night to a preseason game but give him a chance then eiher elevate him or cut him based on his actions during the game.
2) My second reason would be that we need to know what we have, might as well put some guys in to see what we have.
by ChesapeakeBay9er on Dec 31, 2010 11:11 AM PST up reply actions
My problem with playing Nate
is that it’s only 1 game and it won’t tell us anything. He could have a great game and still be nothing better than a 3rd string QB. He could have a bad game and he could still be a franchise QB.
If the team wanted to see what Nate could do then they should had started him about a month ago, but nobody would had been happy with that and no coach would had done that with his job on the line.
1 game is just 1 game and it would tell us nothing about Nate Davis or his future as a QB.
Interesting comment from MJ:
" You’re not going to be able to make a bunch of wholesale changes in one week, but the goal is to go out and win the game and that’s the most important thing."
The fact he even mentioned making wholesale changes leads me to think that he at least thought of wanting to make serious changes from what was established with Sing. I’d LOVE to know exactly what he would have wanted to change…
On KNBR last night they were saying Nate may be re-signed
The report was the Niners were going to try and sign Nate Davis up for another year before his current contract expires and he becomes eligible to sign with other teams as a restricted-rights Free-Agent.

by 













































