2010 NFL Free Agency Preview: Seattle Seahawks
On Tuesday we put up the Arizona Cardinals Free Agency Preview, and now we're moving on to the second installment in this series. Next up, the Seattle Seahawks.
The Seahawks have been a supreme disappointment ever since making it to Super Bowl XL in 2006. That did not change in their first and only year with Jim Mora as head coach. Seattle was decimated by injuries, especially on their offensive line, which led to another disappointing losing season.
2010 will mark the return of Pete Carroll to the NFL as the head coach of the Seahawks. No doubt he will bring the same youthful energy that defined his tenure at USC, but what changes does he have in store for Seattle's depleted roster?
After the jump, let's take a look at who is eligible for free agency this off-season...
Free Agents
WR Nate Burleson (UFA) - At only 28 years of age and coming off the best season of his career, Burleson should garner some interest on the open market. The Seahawks are expected to release Deion Branch, their other top receiver, but it is unclear what they intend to do in regards to Burleson.
T Brandon Frye (RFA) - Frye has spent the majority of his career on the practice squad, but saw some time as the starting left tackle this season due to injuries. He was placed on injured reserve October 13th after suffering a neck injury.
LB David Hawthorne (ERFA) - Hawthorne impressed the Seahawks management when he filled in for the injured Lofa Tatupu at middle linebacker. They have even discussed including some 3-4 packages in their defense, as a way of getting Hawthorne on the field. Whether or not they go so far as to change their defense to get him snaps, it seems like Hawthorne is a lock to return to Seattle in 2010.
LB Lance Laury (RFA) - Laury is a key contributor on the Seattle Special Teams. Even if he is not tendered a qualifying offer and becomes an unrestricted free agent, it seems likely that he will remain with the Seahawks.
DB Ken Lucas (UFA) - Lucas spent much of the season as Seattle's starting right cornerback. It's possible that he will return to the club, but they could use an upgrade at the cornerback position.
K Olindo Mare (UFA) - Mare set a franchise record when he ended the season with 21 consecutive field goals. He was superb in 2009 and there's a good chance he'll be back with the club in 2010.
WR Ben Obomanu (RFA) - Obomanu missed all of 2008 with an ankle injury, and he did not have much of an impact in 2009. He has recorded 15 receptions during his three years with the club.
DL Cory Redding (RFA) - Seattle traded for Redding before the start of this season, hoping to pair him with Patrick Kerney at the defensive end position. Redding was solid but unspectacular in his stint with the Seahawks.
G Rob Sims (RFA) - Sims was projected to start at guard for the Seahawks, but missed a good chunk of the season due to injury.
C Chris Spencer (RFA) - Lost his starting center position to rookie Max Unger. He spent the last three weeks rotating at the guard position.
DL Darryl Tapp (RFA) - Played behind Patrick Kerney and Cory Redding at the defensive end position. He has been a consistent player throughout his four year career.
Needs
Left Tackle - All-Pro tackle Walter Jones was unable to play at all this year, and according to his Twitter page he will be retiring from football. Sean Locklear spent 2009 as the starting left tackle, but he is not thought of as the long term answer at the position. If they are going to improve their offense in 2010 they will need to rebuild their line, starting with an upgrade at left tackle.
Guard - Rob Sims and Chris Spencer have shown some potential at the guard position, but they have not been able to put it all together as of yet. This could be an area where bringing in another player to add some competition could yield improved play on the interior of the Seahawks line.
Quarterback - Once considered one of the league's elite quarterbacks, Matt Hasselbeck seems to be on the downside of his career. In 2009 he was largely ineffective, even on the rare occasions when his offensive line afforded him time to throw. Given that Hasselbeck is now 34 years old, it seems likely that Seattle will bring in a young quarterback at some point this off-season to groom for the future.
Running Back - Justin Forsett averaged over five yards a carry this season, but adding another back to compliment his running style could give the Seahawks lackluster running game a boost.
Safety - Neither of the Seahawks starting safeties are playing at a very high level. Both Jonathan Babineaux and Deon Grant were exposed in coverage situations in 2009. Look for Seattle to pursue a safety with more ball skills to upgrade the position.
Defensive Line - You can never have enough defensive linemen, and the Seahawks would do well to upgrade their line in order to fully take advantage of their talent linebacker corps. Another big body up front would help keep the second level of their defense running free to the ball. The addition of another outside pass rusher to partner with Patrick Kerney would also help to shore up their pass defense.
Summary
Given all their needs, I think upgrading the offensive line is the most pressing. An improvement in the trenches would immediately improve their entire offense. When you consider the value that teams assign to franchise left tackles, it seems likely that Seattle will hold off on pursuing a starting tackle in free agency and instead focus on picking one up via the draft.
It is more likely that they will look to add depth to the interior of their line via free agency. By increasing their talent pool on the offensive line, they can help mitigate the effect of injuries on their offensive production.
The other big question mark on the offensive side of the ball concerns the quarterback position. At the age of 34, Hassellbeck does not fit in with where this team is going. It seems very likely that Carroll and company will look to add a talented young quarterback at some point during the draft or free agency. There have even been rumblings of a possible Matt Hasselbeck - Mike Holmgren reunion in Cleveland. Still, if the offensive line is improved I would expect Hasselbeck to return as the starter and to be productive in 2010.
Since being hired as the head coach, Pete Carroll has been linked to just about every former USC player now in the NFL. Everyone from Reggie Bush to LenDale White have been rumored to be heading for a reunion with Carroll as a member of the Seahawks. While only time will tell if any of these rumors actually come to fruition, I think for the most part they will remain hearsay and conjecture.
One thing Carroll has always been known for is his defensive coaching prowess, and I that is the side of the ball where he will make the most impact. He will likely try to find a way to improve Seattle's pass rush, as well as finding at least one play making safety.
Do you think there is any truth to the rumors of possible USC reunions involving Carroll and his former college players? What would you do at the quarterback position if you were running the Seahawks? Seattle has some talent in their receiving corps but they lack a true number one, who would be a good fit for them at that position?
33 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great writeup from a Seahawks' fan's perspective.
For needs, pretty much everything but Center, FB, WR, TE, LB, K, and P. Though WR is debatable since Carroll seems to favor having at least one big WR.
Dream draft for me personally would be:
1.6. Clausen, QB, Notre Dame
1.24 Charlie Brown, LT, USC (trade back from 14 and get a 3rd rounder)
2.8 Lamarr Houston, DT, Texas
3. Joe McKnight, RB, USC
4. Mike Williams, WR, Syracuse
5. Ciron Black, G, LSU (Dream if he falls this fall, but he’s looked bad so far)
6. Sherrick McManis, CB, Northwestern
7. Daniel Teo’Nesheim, DE, Washington
Charlie Brown.
lol
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Feb 10, 2010 3:07 PM PST up reply actions
Please not another bum from Notre Dame.
I’m fine with Matt Hasselbeck and if he doesn’t work out well then Mike Teel can definitely step up.
I dislike Notre Dame as much as the next guy
But if you can’t see Jimmy Clausen’s talent you’re probably blind (not that there’s anything wrong with that).
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Feb 10, 2010 11:30 PM PST up reply actions
Brady Quinn
had “talent” coming out of there too.
The Tim Tebow Story "A Bust In The Making" ...Part 2 Coming After The Draft...Stay Tuned.
Only two USC guys? C’mon… you have to have at least 4, dontcha think? Carroll’s looovvvvveeeesssss his guys. In a couple years, I expect you to draft Barkley too whether you need a QB or not.
I was thinking this is probably the most likely scenario for your draft this year:
1a. Taylor Mays FSS USC
1b. Damian Williams WR USC
2. Everson Griffen DE USC
3. Charles Brown OT USC
4. Joe McKnight RB USC
5. Anthony McCoy TE USC
6. Jeff Byers C/G USC
7. Josh Pinkard CB USC
Look about right?
The Tim Tebow Story "A Bust In The Making" ...Part 2 Coming After The Draft...Stay Tuned.
Yup
You certainly see a lot of that in mock drafts. I think a lot of Seahawk fans wouldn’t mind seeing Brown, Williams or McKnight chosen at some point in the draft, but some mockers think Carroll’s got a mancrush on every dude he’s ever coached (or coached against).
Obviously that was meant to be a joke but I do think he will pick at least two of his former players and not because they played for him at USC but because they are talented.
The Tim Tebow Story "A Bust In The Making" ...Part 2 Coming After The Draft...Stay Tuned.
I knew you were joking
but some mockers aren’t. I saw one recent mock that had Mays as the #14 pick with Griffen or Brown as alternative picks.
Wow I can tell you’ve done some research! I take it this means you have Clausen rated higher than Sam Bradford? Or maybe you think Bradford will be gone by the time Seattle picks…
Likely the former considering Clausen is much better.
I chose water over wine... Jars of formaldehyde... think of all the things I missed... Why'd you make me a scientist?
Calusen played in a pro-style offense
Carroll does not like spread ball or spread QB’s
The Tim Tebow Story "A Bust In The Making" ...Part 2 Coming After The Draft...Stay Tuned.
reply fail
The Tim Tebow Story "A Bust In The Making" ...Part 2 Coming After The Draft...Stay Tuned.
I have Clausen rated higher because he's from a pro style offense,
and he was highly sought after by Pete Carroll. But if it were Bradford, I wouldn’t be too upset. I’m not a fan of spread QBs myself, but Bradford seems to be safter than most spread QBs. He was possibly the #1 pick last year.
Dream Draft: Clausen, Brown (#24), Houston, McKnight, Mike Williams, Black, McManis, DTN.
"He was possibly the #1 pick last year."
But wasn’t McCoy as well (and Snead looked like a pretty hot prospect)?
While I can’t vouch for the quality of either Clausen or Bradford (I’ll let better-informed writers do that), I think this is a pretty good opportunity to grab the Quarterback Of The Future. We’ve got an extra 1st-rounder and it looks like we’ve got a shot at one of the top two guys on the board. Its great to be able to turn a late-round pick into a franchise QB, but its pretty rare and you could wait for one forever.
With the Rams being sold, I think the FO will hold off on getting a QB (it doesn’t make a lot of sense if the new owners want to bring in their own GM/coach). The Lions, Bucs and Chiefs all have QBs and the Skins are just as likely to grab an OT as a QB with their first pick. Absent a trade, I think its pretty likely that the Seahawks will be able to take the first or second QB off the board (if they so decide).
I just hope you don't end up with Eric Berry, we have a hard enough time passing on our division foes.
What I want to ask, is if you draft Clausen, are you done with Hasslebeck, or do you want to bring Clausen in slowly?
Also, in regards to the tackle situation, if Okung falls to you, would you take him over Clausen and select a QB in the later rounds?
Also, if you decide to not draft Clausen, what other QB’s in THIS draft?
Mocking.............
1a- traded for Eric Berry
1b- CJ Spiller RB Clemson
2 traded to acquire E Berry
3. Calloway, Selvish Capers, Jason Fox
4. Mike johnson OG, John Jerry, Asamoah
5. Stephen Williams, Jacoby Ford, Freddie barnes
6.Anthony Wiseman CB Maryland
7. Danny Batten, South Dakota State - DE
Sorry FloridaDanny, I owe you one, I just don't know what it is!!
Me specifically, or just any Seahawks fan? Is Fearless Frog still around?
Here’s my personal opinion:
1) I do not want Eric Berry. Safety is like LB, and I don’t think we can afford to have 3 highly paid LBs and one highly paid safety. I’d rather build on the line first. To me Eric Berry is like Aaron Curry (and I do not speak for all Seahawks fans on this), in that he’s a supposedly very safe high upside guy at a position that is admittedly easier to find depth, and perhaps not as important as other positions. Even so, I think there are chinks in Eric Berry’s armor as there were in Aaron Curry’s that people are missing.
2) I don’t think our o-line is that bad. If you have 4 LTs get injured, a center, and a guard, and a 34 year old QB who can’t throw 25 yards and doesn’t trust his arm, you’re going to look bad. That being said, we do need a LT. Gibbs, our new o-line coach, doesn’t generally draft OL in the first round, but that could just be because he’s always had a good o-line. He has said that he can turn a garbage man into an NFL guard, but I think LT is a different story altogether. Personally I think Okung is safe, but not dominant. I don’t like Campbell or Davis (too injury prone, too weight/lazy prone). I do like Charlie Brown. He’s from USC, and he’s light and a good zone fit. I’m not sure on Bulaga, and Trent Williams is a RT so he’s not a fit.
3) Hasselbeck is completely done. I don’t know if you watched our last 5 or so games, but in the Texans game, we lost TOP something like 43 to 17 minutes. It was ridiculous. 3 and outs over and over again. People blame the line and the WRs, but I place the majority of the blame on Hasselbeck.
4) With the #6 pick, I would take Clausen or Bradford, or if I didn’t feel either of them were going to be a good NFL QB after scouting them, I’d trade down or take Dez Bryant/Joe Haden.
5) Other QBs? We took a 6th rounder last year, and I don’t know if the new regime will be sold on Teel from Rutgers, but perhaps PC likes Canfield, Pike, Snead, Lefavour more.
Dream Draft: Clausen, Brown (#24), Houston, McKnight, Mike Williams, Black, McManis, DTN.
Round 1 / Pick 6
I just saw a mock draft earlier today having the Seahawks taking LT Bryan Bulaga of Iowa at 6 after Okung was taken at 5. Given the magnitute of Seattle’s problems this doesn’t make sense to me. Just shows that there are all kinds of opinions out there!
by 49erFanSince1950 on Feb 10, 2010 5:53 PM PST up reply actions
Yeah, that was McShay's draft, I believe he put some random picks in certain places just for 'shock value'.
Why get Bulaga at 6 when Davis, Campbell, Brown, Trent Williams, etc. will be available at 14? Unless they’re really sold on Bulaga, which I’m not after his performance against Brandon Graham.
Dream Draft: Clausen, Brown (#24), Houston, McKnight, Mike Williams, Black, McManis, DTN.
Williams looks like a RT, not so much a LT
Davis seems like a better fit for a man-blocking scheme than a ZBS. Campbell has injury concerns and team that just went through 4 LTs in a few months might not want to pay one $60 million to ride the bench. Brown is probably a reach at #14 (though he probably won’t make it into the second), but would be worth the pick if he ended up as an effective starting LT.
The point of a lot of these early mock drafts is to attract interest to players and start a discussion. There aren’t really any “wrong” picks at this point (they’re probably all wrong) unless the mocker has assigns picks without respect to a team’s needs or scheme.
I have to disagree on Okung not looking dominant.
He gave up 1 sack and 2 pressures to the QB all season. He is definitely a lock as the best LT in this draft.
Mocking.............
1a- traded for Eric Berry
1b- CJ Spiller RB Clemson
2 traded to acquire E Berry
3. Calloway, Selvish Capers, Jason Fox
4. Mike johnson OG, John Jerry, Asamoah
5. Stephen Williams, Jacoby Ford, Freddie barnes
6.Anthony Wiseman CB Maryland
7. Danny Batten, South Dakota State - DE
Sorry FloridaDanny, I owe you one, I just don't know what it is!!
Okung is a heavily debatable player.
Here’s a scouting report on him as to what concerns or chinks in his armor he may have. Obviously it’s not gospel, but I already had concerns about him, and I’ve noticed a few people having concerns about him that makes me think he’s not as bullet proof as everyone thinks.
Dream Draft: Clausen, Brown (#24), Houston, McKnight, Mike Williams, Black, McManis, DTN.
I think Hasselbeck will play until injuries prevent him from being successful.
Clausen would ideally be brought in slowly. The new OC Bates keeps talking about modeling the Hawks offense after the Broncos and how their main focus seems to be building and training the OLine to work Gibbs’ ZBS. Okung would draw interest, but I don’t think the Hawks will rate him much higher than the other OTs that they can pick at #14. If the Hawks draft a QB, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Seneca traded and have them keep Teel as a backup. Bates has also mentioned RB is not an early round priority, much like it never was for the Broncos. I look for the Hawks to look for an RB in rounds 4 to 5, possibly LeGarrette Blount although the USC connection with McKnight may have them looking earlier.
I pretty much agree with all of this.
The only difference I’id make is that I’d argue that Hasselbeck’s injuries are already preventing him from being successful. I’d argue that he’s a bottom 5 starting QB at this point, or was last year, and if you ranked all the QBs, I might put in him #40th or so (I’d take some backups over him).
Dream Draft: Clausen, Brown (#24), Houston, McKnight, Mike Williams, Black, McManis, DTN.
(I’d take some backups over him).
You want Shaun Hill for him?
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Feb 10, 2010 11:33 PM PST up reply actions
This is my preference
I’d prefer that we pick a QB that could get on the field in the first year or two, as Hasselbeck has just one year left and has been injured a bunch in recent years. My ideal scenario is drafting Clausen or Bradford with the #6, trading Seneca to the Browns for a pick, starting Hasselbeck this year and then putting our rookie QB in if he goes down.
I’d take Nate Burleson over any 49ers WR other than Crabtree. Cut Brandon Jones and demote Morgan, than defenses will pay for rolling coverage towards Crabs and VD.
He's injured a lot though...
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Feb 10, 2010 3:09 PM PST up reply actions
That's probably true.
And sad too…..
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Feb 10, 2010 11:36 PM PST up reply actions
I think Pete Carroll will have a hard time adjusting back to the NFL
College coaches are gods and he has the advantage of having more talent on his team than most of the teams they play against. Having the advantage with talent is clearly not the case in Seattle. I’m guessing he end up lasting about as long as Nick Saben.
Don't trust this guy. He lies.
I agree and disagree.
Most college coaches run gimmicky type offenses and thus fail in the NFL. Carroll runs a pro style offense. But yes, Carroll has almost always had more talent than the team he’s coached against, so it will be an adjustment.
Dream Draft: Clausen, Brown (#24), Houston, McKnight, Mike Williams, Black, McManis, DTN.




























