Football University: Zone blocking
Today I wanted to talk about one of my favorite subjects, offensive line play. A brief history of where I come from on this. I attended a small high school in Idaho (graduating class of 125). I played both ways on the football team. Offensively I played RG (nothing more fun than pulling on a sweep and knocking a LB off his feet), and defensively I played RT. We ran a 4-3 on defense.
No, that's not a spud cellar--it's my high school.
Offensively we used a traditional blocking scheme which assigned a particular player to each offensive linemen. If you did a trap block you were still responsible for a specific assignment and you were coached to hit the guy and keep driving. If someone went by you they were someone else's assignment.
Zone blocking is completely different. In a zone defense you're taught to cover a specific area. With zone blocking you're taught to block in a specific area. Join me after the jump as I go into detail on how it works.
When running a zone blocking scheme there are a couple of things that you have to determine. The first is where the blocking will be taken place. Is it an Inside Zone (between the offensive tackles), Outside Zone (just outside the tackles), or a stretch play (inside the last offensive player)?
Once you've determined that the next step is to determine whether you're covered or uncovered. This is the most important part of zone blocking. Let me illustrate
Here we have a 3-4 defense (yes, I realize that the DE are split a bit further out than is normal but this is useful for illustrating the technique of zone blocking)
Which of the offensive linemen are "covered". Well pretty clearly we've got the LT, Center and RT covered, with the LG, RG and TE "uncovered". Now that we've determined what's our position is we make our moves. The ball is snapped and the LT makes his first move. It's not a block straight ahead like you would assume (which is traditional in offensive line blocking). Rather it's a step left and then ahead. The purpose of this is to gain leverage and get a double-team help from the LG.
Suddenly the DE sees this gap and says to himself "I've got this play made". Naturally he steps into it, but what he doesn't know is that he's stepped into a trap.
The DE takes the bait and steps into the hole that's been left open. The LT then takes him on at an angle and thus has the leverage to drive him away from the play.
The guard hasn't been sitting on his hands this entire time. He takes a step to the right and up to take on the other shoulder of the DE. Suddenly the DE finds himself with two offensive linemen containing him and driving him away from the play.
Now you may have noticed that there's no blocking assignment here for the LB. Be patient and all will be revealed. The Guard (i.e. assisting lineman) ignores the LB as long as possible. Even though his hands are on the chest/shoulder of the DE he's always got the LB in his eyes (same with the tackle). They're waiting for the LB to make a move.
If the LB moves to inside of the DE, then the Guard will move to the second level to pick him up. If he moves to the outside of the play the Tackle will move to the second level and pick him up. Either way he's covered. It doesn't matter if it's a LB there, or if the LB drops into coverage and a safety comes up. What matters is the space there and what the player decides to do.
Now let's take a look at the entire LOS. Here we have the same 3-4 with a LB crowding the LOS in anticipation of a run play to that side.
You can see here what the basic moves are. All the covered players are slide stepping, while all the covered players are moving in at an angle.
So what's the job of the running back in all of this? Well he has to be patient and wait to see what hole develops. He can't be a dance behind the LOS guy or he'll be dropped for a loss. He has to get the ball, see what's happening with the secondary guys and then head that way. This is very important because sometimes a hole will not be opened up when the RB makes his move.
You can see here that the RB has two options. he can run between the center and the RG and the RG will shed his blocker and pick up the LB. Likewise he can go between the LG and the LT and the LG will shed his guy and pick up the LB. This is all happening with the 2nd and 3rd step.
If the defenders try to shift direction and give up the momentum they've suddenly lost all their leverage and will usually find themselves on their backs.
The principle is the same for pass blocking. If you're covered you pick up your guy. If you're uncovered you slide over and help the covered man, all the while waiting to see what happens with blitzes and stunts.
Here are some real life examples.
Here we have the Denver Broncos on a passing down before the snap.
Here the ball is snapped. The LT slides a step laterally and the LG comes at an angle on the end.
The LG is driving at the DE on the shoulder, which gives the offensive lineman all the leverage. By this point the ball is thrown and the play is over for the linemen.
Here's another view of the same play and you can see the nice pocket this gives the QB
Now on to a running play
Before the snap. The Broncos are in a wildcat formation here.
The ball is snapped. The LG pulls. The Center is covered and the RG slides over to help. The TE seals off his man and the LT waits for a defender. Result is a big run off RT.
The Niners have been running a quasi-zone blocking scheme. Let me illustrate.
Here's the Monday Night game against the Cardinals. Before the snap
Sims is covered, Baas is uncovered, Heitmann is covered, Rachal is covered, Snyder is uncovered.
The snap
Baas pulls. Sims slides to the left. Heitmann slides a half step left and Rachal takes on the shoulder. Baas picks up the MLB and Gore gets a nice run out of it.
Here's what you want in a lineman if you're using a zone blocking scheme. You want a lineman with great footwork. He's got to be able to slidestep quickly and not get tangled up. You want a quick lineman. Size isn't as important as is quickness. If you can get big and quick, great but your guy has to be able to react fast. You also want intelligent lineman who can figure out the situation quickly.
There are some big advantages to using a zone blocking scheme. Your center doesn't have to call out blocking assignments. Watch the Broncos sometime. You'll never see the center making assignments because the linemen already know what they have to do. It's easy to get leverage and it makes it especially easy for running plays. Denver runs a zone blocking scheme almost exclusively and we know what they've been able to do with their running backs.
Here are some great resources for more information on zone blocking.
Brian Billick explains zone blocking
Here's a set of YouTube clips of a high school coach explaining zone blocking to his linemen. He does a great job breaking it down. He first does a demonstration on a white board and then walks the players through it. The whole series is about 45 min long.
Texan Houston lineman explains zone blocking
The total series takes about 45 min to watch but is well worth your time.
49 comments
|
8 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Very informative and well-written
Rec’d
by Rabbit T on Mar 10, 2010 7:22 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
Thank you
Clearest explanation of zone blocking I have read in many years.
Nice Job
I like the insertion of game frames.
I have a question for you though. Since it seems we are looking for a blocking TE, what would having an extra lineman on the field either allow or limit zone blocking schemes?
It allows for the guard to pull
If you notice the screen shots from the 49ers game against AZ we had VD in on the right side, so he picked up the guy that normally would be picked up by the RT. This allows everyone else to shift their spacing down a spot so when Baas pulled he could hit the hole and pick up the second level guy, in this case the linebacker and spring Gore for a good run
Member of the legendary David Carr thread, 6 March 2010
Awesome article
I guess it’s been too long for me because I played line in HS and I’ve just about forgotten all this. Do you think Solari will run the same kind of blocking scheme? It brings up some ideas on who we can bring in if we had a good idea of what he’ll do.
Don't feel bad
None of this was stuff I remembered from high school (I graduated 15 years ago). It took me awhile to study up on this and get it figured out—the youtube clips really helped me out.
As far as Solari goes I think we’ll be seeing a lot more zone blocking than we have. Like I said in the article we were running some zone blocking (our most effective running plays used zone blocking) but I expect a switch to more, especially in the passing game since that will help out against blitzers, etc.
Member of the legendary David Carr thread, 6 March 2010
Great Job
From someone who has never played football before this was a great read. My question is how hard is it to make the swith from ‘blocking TE’ to O-Tackle?
Not having played TE myself I'm not 100% sure
but I’d imagine size is the biggest thing. You want a big TE that can bulk up a bit. VD is 6’3 and 250lbs, all of it muscle. If he put on 35 lbs he could probably make the move to LT but he’d be a bit undersized.
Some of the TE at the combine are the size to make the switch to LT. Rob Gronkowski out of Arizona State is a perfect example. He’s 6’6, 264 lbs. 30 lbs and he’s a LT. I believe Staley weighed about 270 in college and then made the switch to LT. He’s up to 315 now
Member of the legendary David Carr thread, 6 March 2010
Usually, it isn’t that difficult (relatively speaking). Often, the uncovered tackle and the tight end are covered in the same way by the defense (ie, both have DL on their outside shoulder and a LB over the inside shoulder).
Depending on the defense, of course, that doesn’t necessarily have to be true.
Also, smileyman’s above point to size is valid. A tackle could have a DL line up head on which is rarer for a TE. Also, starting farther out on the LOS usually means there are better angles to down block on DL as opposed to tackles that are relied on to block man-on more often. Having the angle allows a smaller man to have a better chance of success blocking a larger man, all things equal.
Please tell me we have moved past the dark ages of post hoc ergo propter hoc.
by Yeti Monster on Mar 10, 2010 12:43 PM PST up reply actions
This is great
It makes me want to get back on the field (I was a center). The best part about a trap play was the opportunity to simply level a defender that thought he had a clear route to the play. I always like pulling around the tackles on runs to the outside as well, because it allowed opportunity to turn DBs and LBs into pavement. Anytime I could get to the second level of defenders, it was chops-lickin’ time.
Great explanation of zone blocking, takes me back.
by Andrew Davidson on Mar 10, 2010 9:10 AM PST reply actions
Niners Nation football team
Andrew Davidson at Center
smileyman at RG
Member of the legendary David Carr thread, 6 March 2010
chickmagnet at waterboy
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Mar 10, 2010 11:36 AM PST up reply actions
YOU CAN DO IT!
"Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life son."
by bakoninerfan on Mar 10, 2010 2:48 PM PST up reply actions
YOU CAN DO IT ALL NIGHT LONG
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Mar 10, 2010 3:11 PM PST up reply actions
I'll play Cheerleader Manager
I want to be in charge of the HOT Niner Nation Cheerleaders.
I’m having open casting calls at my house on Saturday!!! lol
Traps were great fun, as were counters
My favorite, though, were the screens. Nothing brings a smile to my face more than giving us fat kids a chance to truck a puny corner.
Please tell me we have moved past the dark ages of post hoc ergo propter hoc.
by Yeti Monster on Mar 10, 2010 12:46 PM PST up reply actions
I forgot to add something to the article
Zone blocking is great for passing too. One of the things that rookie linemen have difficulty with is the stunts and blitzes that NFL defenses throw at them. If you’re assigned to block player A and he stunts over to the guard do you pick him up? What if it’s a delayed blitz?
Zone blocking makes the transition easy although linemen have to undo lots of conditioning. Ryan Clady’s rookie year he allowed 0 sacks. That’s unheard of. I don’t care how good of a lineman you are you’ll allow sacks, but I think this zone blocking scheme really helped him with the transition.
Of course he took a giant step backwards this year but I blame that on Kyle Orton hanging on to the ball too long.
2008 the Broncos allowed 14 sacks. 2009 it jumped up to 34.
Member of the legendary David Carr thread, 6 March 2010
Fantastic work...
Can we get some more of these? All I remember from HS ball was block forward >.<
"[...] coordinator Bud Foster has never had problems filling holes."
what about the
“lookout block”? You don’t remember those?
by Andrew Davidson on Mar 10, 2010 9:24 AM PST up reply actions
I think Adam Snyder has a bunch of those in his repetoire
Member of the legendary David Carr thread, 6 March 2010
Hah
That is mostly for flag football. Last time I played I faced two former all-state Gs (this is Virginia, so there are some hosses out here), and it took them about as long to get past me as it took me to yell “man loose!”. So much fun…
"[...] coordinator Bud Foster has never had problems filling holes."
I'll be doing some more
At the front page there’s a drop down box where you can select certain sections. All the ones talking football like this will be called Football University and will be labeled as such in the drop down.
The first topic was just a general glossary of terms. I haven’t decided yet what to do next, so if you have any suggestions fire away.
Member of the legendary David Carr thread, 6 March 2010
Defensive Schemes
Start with the basics, like 3-4 and 4-3 and how the players are utilized in those sets. There is a wealth of information out there that could be shared!
"[...] coordinator Bud Foster has never had problems filling holes."
I think that's what I'll probably do
Start with the 3-4 and 4-3, then in another post move on to secondary schemes like the Tampa 2 and what not.
Member of the legendary David Carr thread, 6 March 2010
can't wait to read through this
when I have more time – but where’s the football U logo???
If you don't like Brandon Medders you're not a true fan.
We never finalized the logo I thought . . .?
Member of the legendary David Carr thread, 6 March 2010
I made two different ones to choose from
and I thought I sent them to you guys… no?
If you don't like Brandon Medders you're not a true fan.
Yeah but I sent back a suggestion for a change
and then the conversation kinda dropped. How bout you send ’em to me again and we start all over? :-)
Member of the legendary David Carr thread, 6 March 2010
sounds good - let me see if I can find that email
If you don't like Brandon Medders you're not a true fan.
hmm
I found the emails where I sent you the logos but not any email with feedback…
If you don't like Brandon Medders you're not a true fan.
great post
thanks for writing all of this. I had actually been wondering what zone blocking was and how it affected what personnel teams needed. That was a very interesting read.
by hellaninersfan on Mar 10, 2010 12:16 PM PST reply actions
McGM needs to read this article
because all the offensive linemen we seem to have had are all big yet do not have the prime requisite which is:
“Here’s what you want in a lineman if you’re using a zone blocking scheme. You want a lineman with great footwork. He’s got to be able to slidestep quickly and not get tangled up. You want a quick lineman. Size isn’t as important as is quickness. If you can get big and quick, great but your guy has to be able to react fast. You also want intelligent lineman who can figure out the situation quickly.”
Instead we have big and SLOW linemen who are beaten to the punch by the defender or our guys have sloppy footwork which again allows a quicker defender to get by them.
McGM’s philosophy of BIG works fairly well except on our O-line and I think this article helps highlight why.
Like I said in the article it really depends on what kind of scheme you want to run
that’s one of the problems with having so many different offensive coordinators—you draft different types of players each year and can’t get consistency with it.
Member of the legendary David Carr thread, 6 March 2010
good stuff
really enjoyed reading this…so much so that I told my boss he was interrupting me while i was reading it. i was practicing my pulling technique by catching him off guard….
hey, i have a question about personnel in the draft. Namely Bruce Campbell.
With the workout he had at the combine- he seems gifted physically, and would just need some help in being coached up. Seems like more of the talk this year has surrounded guys like Okung Iupati and the fella from OU. But from what I’ve heard about Campbell and reading this, it sounds like he’d be a great pick, as his inexperience would not hinder him in a zone blocking environment…thoughts?
The guy’s a freak athlete, no question. Most of the question marks he’s raised have to do with technique, mental awareness, and toughness (due to a history of injuries).
He has experience in a zone scheme at Maryland, so he should hold some familiarity with the system. His biggest issue will be technique.
Until he corrects his footwork and hand placement, he will not be a successful NFL player. In college, he’s been able to use superior strength and athletic ability to physically handle lesser opponents, especially in the run game. He won’t be able to do that in the NFL, where so much success is dependent on stance, footwork, and leverage.
I think he will be a good pick for a team with a great O-line coach and some time to develop, but the Niners need someone to compete for a starting spot now. Plus we already have an O line project in Alex Boone. I do believe Campbell is more gifted athletically than Boone, but developmentally they’re similar.
Please tell me we have moved past the dark ages of post hoc ergo propter hoc.
by Yeti Monster on Mar 10, 2010 1:02 PM PST up reply actions
Speaking of projects
I’ve been wanting to know, what is known about Chris Patrick? He was listed on the depth chart as the backup RT. Seems kinda small (6’4", 280) but someone seems to think he’s got potential.
by Mangoman on Mar 10, 2010 1:32 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
He's bounced around a few practice squads
Seems almost like an emergency depth type of guy. A quick search led me to the below report. Outside of that I don’t know much about him.
Has decent technique and quickness. Reacts well and can find his way into the pile as a run blocker. Possesses very good balance. Unproven in almost every aspect of the position. Not a massive specimen. Undersized for a pass defender. Can get beaten by physical pass-rushers.
Please tell me we have moved past the dark ages of post hoc ergo propter hoc.
by Yeti Monster on Mar 10, 2010 2:04 PM PST up reply actions
I do think Campbell has the most upside of any lineman in the draft
but he’s very, very raw. He should’ve gone back to school for another year.
Member of the legendary David Carr thread, 6 March 2010
Another raw Maryland prospect
There seems to be quite a few of them recently (Campbell, VD, Heyward-Bey). Anyone know anything about the coaching staff there?
Please tell me we have moved past the dark ages of post hoc ergo propter hoc.
by Yeti Monster on Mar 10, 2010 2:28 PM PST up reply actions
They just like their prospects over in Maryland like I like my fish.
I don't know about that, to the groin.
by howtheyscored on Mar 10, 2010 2:47 PM PST up reply actions
With wasabi and soy sauce?
Please tell me we have moved past the dark ages of post hoc ergo propter hoc.
by Yeti Monster on Mar 10, 2010 3:19 PM PST up reply actions
Hold the wasabi and you might be onto something.
I don't know about that, to the groin.
by howtheyscored on Mar 10, 2010 3:52 PM PST up reply actions

by 









































